Abstract
MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs of ~24 nt that can block mRNA translation and/or negatively regulate its stability. There is a large body of evidence that dysregulation of miRNAs is a hallmark of cancer. miRNAs are often aberrantly expressed and their function is linked to the regulation of oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes involved in cell signaling pathway. MiR-221 and miR-222 are two highly homologous microRNAs, whose upregulation has been recently described in several types of human tumors. MiR-221/222 have been considered to act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, depending on tumor system. Silencing oncomiRs or gene therapy approaches, based on re-expression of miRNAs that are down-regulated in cancer cells, could represent a novel anti-tumor approach for integrated cancer therapy. Here we will review the role of miR-221/222 in cancer progression and their use as prognostic and therapeutic tools in cancer.
Keywords: microRNA, cancer, cancer therpay
INTRODUCTION
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ~22nt single stranded RNAs that negatively regulate protein expression by binding to partially complementary sequences in the 3' untranslated region (3' UTRs) of target gene messenger RNAs (mRNA). MiRNAs are generated by a mechanism that typically involves the transcription of a long precursor (pri-miRNA), which is then processed to produce a second precursor (pre-miRNA) of 60–100 nucleotides in length by the nuclear protein Drosha (Fig. 1). The pre-miRNA is transported to the cytoplasm and a second processing step is carried out by an endoribonuclease of the RNase III family, Dicer, resulting in the final miRNA products [1]. In the cytoplasm, miRNA duplexes are unwound and the mature strand is incorporated into RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Following binding to partially complementary sites, usually in the 3′ UTRs of mRNAs, miRNAs cause an inhibition of translation and, in some cases, the degradation of the target mRNA (Fig. 1) [2]. There are hundreds of miRNAs encoded in the human genome and thousands of target mRNAs, and this explains the important regulatory roles of miRNAs in cell developmental, differentiation, proliferation and apoptotic pathways. Therefore, deregulated miRNAs are involved in the pathogenesis of many human diseases, including cancer. Indeed, both loss and gain of miRNA function contribute to cancer development through a range of different mechanisms. Since miRNAs regulate cancer cell differentiation, proliferation, survival, and metastasis, the regulation of their expression levels may provide a powerful therapeutic strategy toward cancer initiation and progression. MicroRNAs are aberrantly expressed in various cancer types including leukemia [3, 4], lymphoma [5] breast cancer [6, 7], colorectal cancer [8], lung cancer [9, 10], hepatocellular carcinoma [11, 12], and oral cancer [13–15]. Deregulation (e.g., overexpression or loss of expression) of these “cancerous” microRNAs contributes to tumor initiation and progression by favoring uncontrolled proliferation and survival, promoting invasive behavior, and by regulating apoptosis [16, 17]. An increasing number of studies have then demonstrated that microRNAs can function as potential oncogenes (oncomiRs) or oncosuppressor genes (oncosuppressor-miRs), depending on the cellular context and on the target genes. In this regard, miR-221/222 are overexpressed in the majority of epithelial tumors [18] but they can play a tumor-suppressive role in erythroleukemic cells by inhibiting erythropoiesis through the downregulation of c-Kit receptor. Here we review the current knowledge about the role of miR-221/222 in tumor development and their potential as diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic tools.
Fig. (1). microRNA biogenesis.
The production of microRNAs (miRNAs) from pri-miRNA is a complex and coordinated process operated by different groups of enzymes and associated proteins in the nucleus or cytoplasm. The pri-miRNA, located in the nucleus, is converted in pre-miRNA through the cleavage activity of the Drosha enzyme. The produced pre-miRNA is exported to the cytoplasm by the Exportin 5. Upon its arrival into the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNA is processed in ~18–22-nucleotide miRNA duplexes by the cytoplasmic RNase-III Dicer. Usually, one strand of this duplex is degraded, whereas the other strand accumulates as a mature miRNA. From the miRNA-miRNA duplex, only the miRNA enters preferentially in the protein effector complex, formed by the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Perfect or nearly perfect complementarities between miRNA and its target 3’ UTR induce RISC to cleave the target mRNA, whereas imperfect base matching induces mainly translational silencing of the target.
MiR-221/222 Role in Tumor Progression
miR-221/222 are encoded in tandem on the X chromosome in human, mouse and rat and are highly conserved in vertebrates. Moreover, they have the same seed sequence. Many studies to date have been reported on the role of miR-221/222 in cancer development either as oncomiR or as oncosuppressor-miRs (see Table 1 and 2). Overexpression of miR-221/222 has been observed in a number of advanced malignancies indicating that miR-221/222 could be potential therapeutic targets for epithelial cancer [19]. Galardi et al., identified the cell cycle regulator, p27Kip1, as a target of miR-221/miR-222 [20]. They showed that in pancreatic cells, p27Kip1 and miR-221/222 expression levels inversely correlated and demonstrated that miR221/222 overexpression had important consequences on the proliferation rate and the cell cycle phase distribution. These results were then confirmed in glioblastomas [21], in thyroid papillary carcinomas [22], in breast cancer [23], hepatocellular carcinoma [24], and lung cancer [25]. Afterwards many other tumor suppressor genes have been identified as miR-221/222 targets. Fornari et al., reported that CDKN1C/p57, is also a direct target of miR-221 in the liver, suggesting that miR-221 has an oncogenic function in hepatocarcinogenesis. Indeed, transfection of miR-221 into Hep3B cells caused a 1.8-fold decrease of CDKN1C/p57; conversely, SNU449 cells transfected with antimiR-221 exhibited a 1.3-fold increase in CDKN1C/p57 protein levels when compared with negative control miRNA inhibitors [26]. Zhang et al., reported that miR-221/222 directly regulate apoptosis by targeting PUMA in glioblastoma; moreover, they found an inverse relationship, in vivo, between PUMA and miR-221/222 expression in glioma tissues [19]. More recently, we have demonstrated that miR-221/222 are overexpressed in high grade glioma patients and regulate the expression of the tyrosine phosphatase PTPμ [27]. Since PTPμ negatively regulates glioma cells migration, miR-221/222 overexpression has important consequences in glioma tumorigenesis. Moreover, our recent data suggest that miR-221/222 are also able to regulate temozolomide response (Quintavalle, personal communication), by modulating the expression of the DNA repair enzyme, MGMT. By decreasing the expression of MGMT, miR-221/222 render glioma cells more responsive to temozolomide. Therefore, if on one hand miR-221/222 are found overexpressed in highly invasive tumor, on the other hand, patients with higher miR-221/222 levels, could respond better to the therapy. Zhao et al., found frequent up-regulation of miR-221/222 in ER-α negative breast cancer cell lines and in primary tumors and demonstrated that those miRs inhibit ER-α translation by direct interaction with the 3’-UTR of ER-α, providing a molecular mechanism of ER-α posttranscriptional regulation in breast cancer [28]. Di Leva et al., demonstrated a feedback loop within miR-221/222 and ER-α. They showed that miR-221/222 inhibit the expression of ER-α and FOXO3A transcription factors, and that ER-α is able to repress miR-222/221 transcriptional activation. Repression of FOXO3 by miR-221/222, in turn, blocks transcriptional activation of p27 and Bim (Fig. 2). These findings provide evidence that a single miRNA, through its ability to modulate different genes involved in the same network, may act as a strong inhibitor of the entire cellular pathway, suggesting a possible greater therapeutic potential for miRNAs than for a single gene [29]. Terasawa et al., found that nerve growth factor (NGF)-driven activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) pathway in prostate cancer cells, induced expression of miR-221/222. Using a target prediction program, they identified the pro-apoptotic protein Bim, as a potential miR-221/222 target [30]. MicroRNA function depends on the cellular contest. Indeed, miR-222 inhibits oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) cell invasion. Ectopic transfection of miR-222 reduced the expression of matrix metaloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2), both implicated in cell invasion and metastasis, in OTSCC cell lines (Fig. 3). These results indicate that miR-222 plays an important role in OTSCC invasion, and may thus serve as a novel therapeutic target for high risk metastatic OTSCC patients [31]. Another study from Felli et al., indicated that miR-221/222 inhibit normal erythropoiesis and erythroleukemic cell growth at least in part via Kit receptor down-modulation. Indeed, in erythropoietic culture of cord blood CD34+ progenitor cells, miR-221/222 levels are markedly down-modulated. In erythropoietic culture undergoing exponential cell growth, miR down-modulation is inversely related to increasing Kit protein expression. Treatment of CD34+ progenitors with miR-221/222 is able to induce impaired proliferation and increased differentiation of E cells [32]. These last two studies evidence a tumor suppressive role for miR-221/222 in OTSCC and erythrocytes, indicating again that microRNA function is exclusively dependent on the cellular contest and tumor type (Fig. 3).
Table 1.
miR-221/222 as oncogenes
| miRNA Target | Deregulation in Cancer | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| P27/Kip1 | Giloblastoma, thyroid papillary carcinomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer | [21–25] |
| P57 | Hepatocellular carcinoma | [26] |
| Puma | Glioblastoma | [19] |
| ER-α FOXO3 | Breast | [28, 29] |
| PTEN TIMP3 | NSCLC, Hepatocarcinoma, giloma, gastric canser | [44] |
| DDIT4 | Hepatocellular carcinoma | [52] |
| Bim | Prostate cancer | [30] |
Table 2.
miR-221/222 as Tumor Suppressor Genes
Fig. (2). MiR-221/222 as oncomiRs.
MiR-221/222 act as oncomiRs by targeting important tumor suppressor genes such as PTEN, TIMP3, p27Kip1, p57, Bim. MiR-221/222 overexpression induces cell proliferation through the activation of cell cycle and the Akt pathway and blocks TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Moreover, miR-221/222 determine fulvestrant resistance through the activation of the β-catenin pathway.
Fig. (3). MiR-221/222 as tumor suppressor miRs.
MiR-221/222 act as tumor suppressor mIRs in the erythropoietic lineage cells, and oral tongue squamous cells by targeting c-Kit, matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2).
MiR-221/222: Their Role to Response to Therapy in Cancer
Recent studies suggest that chemoresistance may be linked to dysregulation of microRNA function. Furthermore, mounting evidence indicates the existence of similarities between drug-resistant and metastatic cancer cells in terms of resistance to apoptosis and enhanced invasiveness. miR221/222 overexpression is linked to altered response to cancer therapy, either to hormone-based or to conventional chemotherapy. Studies indicate that miR-221/222 have a prominent role in the acquisition of anti-estrogen resistance. Estrogen receptor-α (ERα), plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of breast cancer [33]. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator [34], is considered to be the first line endocrine therapy that greatly improves relapse-free and overall survival of ER-positive breast cancer at all stages [35]. However, acquired resistance to tamoxifen typically develops after prolonged treatment in a majority of initially responsive breast cancers [36]. Moreover, nearly 50% of the advanced ER-positive breast cancer patients do not respond to tamoxifen in the first line setting. From the analysis of miR-221/222-regulated gene expression profiles emerged that resistance to tamoxifen is associated with activation of several growth factor signaling pathways, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR), that may ‘cross-talk’ with the ERα signaling pathway. This results in an activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and PI3K/AKT involved in cell survival and proliferation [35–37]. Knockdown of miR-221 and/or miR-222 sensitized MDA-MB-468 cells to tamoxifen-induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis. These findings indicate that miR-221/222 play a significant role in the regulation of ERα expression and could be potential targets for restoring ERα expression and responding to anti-estrogen therapy in a subset of breast cancers [28]. Other studies demonstrate that miR-221/222 induced fulvestrant resistance in MCF-7 sensitive cells through the deregulation of multiple oncogenic signaling pathways such as the activation of β-catenin and repression of TGF-β-signaling-induced growth inhibition [38] (Fig. 2). Therefore, targeting these two oncomiRs may be a potential therapeutic strategy for preventing the development of fulvestrant resistance or resensitizing breast tumors to this potent estrogen antagonist. Felicetti et al., reported that the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) transcription factor is a repressor of miR-221/222 by direct binding to their putative regulatory region. Specifically, they demonstrated that PLZF silencing in melanomas unblocks miR-221/222, which, in turn, enhanced proliferation and differentiation blockade of the melanoma cells through the down-modulation of p27Kip1 and c-KIT receptor. In vitro and in vivo functional studies, including the use of antisense "antagomiR" oligonucleotides, confirmed the key role of miR-221/222 in regulating the progression of human melanoma [39]. Pu et al., recently reported that plasma levels of miR-221 are a potential biomarker for differentiating colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from controls. Indeed, the elevated plasma miR-221 level is a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in CRC patients and can be used as a potential molecular marker for diagnosis and prognosis of CRC [40]. Chen et al., analyzed different thyroid tumors and, interestingly, they found miR-221/222 overexpressed mostly in papillary thyroid carcinomas [41]. Gottardo et al., identified miR-221 upregulation in bladder cancer compared to bladder normal mucosa, implying the role of miR-221 as prognostic tool also for bladder cancer [42]. Our group showed that in TRAIL-resistant NSCLC cells, levels of miR-221/222 are increased. Transfection with anti-miR-221 and -222 rendered CALU-1-resistant cells sensitive to TRAIL; conversely, H460-sensitive cells treated with miR-221/222 become TRAIL-resistant. We reported that miR-221/222 interfere with TRAIL signaling mainly through p27kip1 (Fig. 2). Thus, high expression levels of miR-221/222 are needed to maintain the TRAIL-resistant phenotype, making these miRs as promising diagnostic tool for TRAIL resistance in NSCLC [25]. Moreover, an interesting regulation loop of miR-221/ 222 and TRAIL sensitivity has been recently described by Acunzo et al., [43]. In fact, it has been reported that miR-130 overexpression is able to downregulate miR-221/222 expression through MET down modulation. This finding highlighted how miR-130a, by targeting MET, is able to reduce miR-221/222 expression and, accordingly, TRAIL resistance in NSCLC cells and strongly confirms the involvement of miR-221/222 in the regulation of TRAIL sensitivity.
Indeed, tumor stratification, on the basis of miR-221/222 expression levels, could be used as prognostic tool to predict TRAIL-sensitivity or TRAIL-resistance in the treatment of NSCLCs [25].
miR-221/222 as Therapeutic Tool
Several reports indicate that miR-221/222 could be used as therapeutic tool to modulate resistance or sensitivity to anti-cancer agents. Our group recently found that MET, through Jun transcriptional activation, upregulates miR-221/222 expression, which, in turn, by targeting PTEN and TIMP3, confers resistance to TRAIL-induced cell death and enhances tumorigenicity of lung and liver cancer cells [44]. PTEN is a lipid phosphatase that directly antagonizes the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase (PI3K) [45]. Its inactivation results in constitutive activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and in subsequent increase in protein synthesis, cell cycle progression, migration, and most importantly survival [46]. TIMP3 belongs to the family of the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), of which there are four family members (TIMP1–4) [47]. They inhibit the activity of metalloproteinases (MMPs) by binding with a 1:1 stoichiometry to the active site [48], but other studies showed that TIMP3 promotes apoptotic cell death [49, 50].
Another study from Chun-Zi et al., demonstrated that miR-221 and miR-222 regulate radiosensitivity, cell growth and invasion of gastric cells, via direct modulation of PTEN expression [51].These results suggest that inhibition of miR-221 and miR-222 might form a novel therapeutic strategy finalized not only to sensitize tumor cells to drug-inducing apoptosis but also to inhibit their survival, proliferation, and invasive capabilities.
Recently, Pineau et al., [52] identified DNA damage-inducible transcript 4 (DDIT4), a modulator of the mTOR pathway, as target of miR-221. They introduced into liver cancer cells, LNA-modified antimiR-221 and antimiR-222. Treatment by antagomiRs, but not scrambled oligonucleotides, reduced the growth of liver cancer cells that overexpressed miR-221/222. Thus the use of synthetic inhibitors of miR-221 may prove to be a promising approach to liver cancer treatment [52]. Galardi et al. showed that miR-221/222 knockdown through antisense LNA oligonucleotides increase p27Kip1 in human prostate cancer (PC3) cells and strongly reduce their clonogenicity in in vitro, whereas xenograft model in SCID mice demonstrated that the ectopic overexpression of miR-221 may confer a high growth advantage. Consistently, treatment of established subcutaneous tumors with antago-miR 222/221 reduces tumor growth by increasing intratumoral p27 amounts [20]. Interestingly, Wang et al. designed adenovirally-expressed shRNAs that functionally co-repressed the expression of miR-221/222 in glioblastoma cells, upregulating p27 expression levels, inducing cell cycle arrest in G1 phase and apoptosis [53]. Finally, Pogribny et al., studied the role of miRNA alterations in the acquisition of cisplatin-resistant phenotype in MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells. They identified a total of 103 miRNAs (46 upregulated and 57 downregulated) in MCF-7 cells resistant to cisplatin. Among the most upregulated miRs they found miR-221/222, involved in the control of cell signaling and cell survival [54]. Our recent data demonstrate that miR-221 and -222 are up-regulated in breast cancer stem cells obtained from patients or from cultured MCF7 cells grown in suspension (Condorelli personal communication). Their role in cancer stem cells behavior is under investigation.
CONCLUSION
The discovery of the important role of miRNAs in cancer has opened up a new era of cancer investigations that take into account new and emerging knowledge regarding the RNA signaling systems within eukaryotic cells such as mammalian cells. Among the many miRNAs already identified as regulators of neoplastic transformation, invasion and metastasis, miR-221/222 have emerged as key miRNAs deregulated in many cancers. Even though miR-221/222 are among the most intensively studied miRNAs, our understanding of their signaling pathways is currently in its early stages. The unraveling of such RNA signaling pathways and networks will be a key to understand the role that deregulated miRNA functioning can play in oncogenic processes and may be important for defining novel therapeutic molecules. Examples of such therapeutics include silencing oncomiRs or gene therapy approaches based on reexpression of miRNAs that are down-regulated in cancer cells. Still many studies are necessary to translate these findings from in vitro to in vivo and to develop successful in vivo delivery systems based on organ specificity, less or no toxicity and no off-target effects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was partially supported by funds from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro, AIRC to GC (grant n.ro 10620), MERIT (RBNE08E8CZ_002) to GC, by the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Research Foundation (MG) and by Programma Operativo Nazionale (PON 01_ 01602) to GC C.Q. is recipient of a FIRC (Federazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro) fellowship.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;16(2):81–97. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;(11):57–66. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Calin GA, Liu C-G, Sevignani C, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Proce Natl Acadf Sci USA. 2004;101(32):11755–11760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404432101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Calin GA, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, et al. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proce Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(24):15524–15529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242606799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Metzler M, Wilda M, Busch K, Viehmann S, Borkhardt A. High expression of precursor microRNA-155/BIC RNA in children with Burkitt lymphoma. Genes, Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;39(2):167–169. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kondo N, Toyama T, Sugiura H, Fujii Y, Yamashita H. miR-206 Expression Is Down-regulated in Estrogen Receptor â in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(13):5004–5008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhaumik D, Scott GK, Schokrpur S, Patil CK, Campisi J, Benz CC. Expression of microRNA-146 suppresses NF-[kappa]B activity with reduction of metastatic potential in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2008;27(42):5643–5647. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Michael MZ, O' Connor SM, van Holst Pellekaan NG, Young GP, James RJ. Reduced Accumulation of Specific MicroRNAs in Colorectal Neoplasia11Note: Susan M. O' Connor and Nicholas G. van Holst Pellekaan contributed equally to this work. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1(12):882–891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, et al. Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 2004;64(11):3753–3756. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yanaihara N, Caplen N, Bowman E, et al. Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell. 2006;9(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murakami Y, Yasuda T, Saigo K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues. Oncogene. 2005;25(17):2537–2545. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Y, Lee ATC, Ma JZI, et al. Profiling microRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals microRNA-224 up-regulation and apoptosis inhibitor-5 as a microRNA-224-specific target. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(19):13205–13215. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707629200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong T-S, Liu X-B, Wong BY-H, Ng RW-M, Yuen AP-W, Wei WI. Mature miR-184 as potential oncogenic microRNA of squamous cell carcinoma of yongue. Clinical Cancer Res. 2008;14(9):2588–2592. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kozaki K-i, Imoto I, Mogi S, Omura K, Inazawa J. Exploration of tumor-suppressive microRNAs silenced by DNA hypermethylation in oral cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(7):2094–2105. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tran N, McLean T, Zhang X, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles in head and neck cancer cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358(1):12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garofalo M, Condorelli GL, Croce CM, Condorelli G. MicroRNAs as regulators of death receptors signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:200–208. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garofalo M, Condorelli G, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in diseases and drug response. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008;8(5):661–667. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu C-G, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(7):2257–2261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510565103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang C, Zhang J, Zhang A, et al. PUMA is a novel target of miR-221/222 in human epithelial cancers. Int J Oncol. 2010;37(6):1621–1626. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Galardi S, Mercatelli N, Giorda E, et al. miR-221 and miR-222 expression affects the proliferation potential of human prostate carcinoma cell lines by targeting p27kip1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(32):23716–23724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701805200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.le Sage C, Nagel R, Egan DA, et al. Regulation of the p27(Kip1) tumor suppressor by miR-221 and miR-222 promotes cancer cell proliferation. EMBO J. 2007;26:3699–3708. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Visone R, Russo L, Pallante P, et al. MicroRNAs (miR)-221 and miR-222, both overexpressed in human thyroid papillary carcinomas, regulate p27Kip1 protein levels and cell cycle. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14(3):791–798. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Miller TE, Ghoshal K, Ramaswamy B, et al. MicroRNA-221/222 Confers Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer by Targeting p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(44):29897–29903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804612200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fu X, Wang Q, Chen J, et al. Clinical significance of miR-221 and its inverse correlation with p27Kip1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(5):3029–3035. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-9969-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Garofalo M, Quintavalle C, Di Leva G, et al. MicroRNA signatures of TRAIL resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(27):3845–3855. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fornari F, Gramantieri L, Ferracin M, et al. MiR-221 controls CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN1B/p27 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2008;27(43):5651–5661. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quintavalle C, Garofalo M, Zanca C, et al. miR-221/222 overexpession in human glioblastoma increases invasiveness by targeting the protein phosphate PTP[mu] Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhao J-J, Lin J, Yang H, et al. MicroRNA-221/222 negatively regulates estrogen receptor and is associated with Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(45):31079–31086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806041200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Di Leva G, Gasparini P, Piovan C, et al. MicroRNA Cluster 221-222 and Estrogen Receptor α Interactions in Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(10):706–721. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Terasawa K, Ichimura A, Sato F, Shimizu K, Tsujimoto G. Sustained activation of ERK1/2 by NGF induces microRNA-221 and 222 in PC12 cells. FEBS Journal. 2009;276(12):3269–3276. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu X, Yu J, Jiang L, et al. MicroRNA-222 regulates cell invasion by targeting matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and manganese superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics. 2009;6(3):131–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Felli N, Fontana L, Pelosi E, et al. MicroRNAs 221 and 222 inhibit normal erythropoiesis and erythroleukemic cell growth via kit receptor down-modulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(50):18081–18086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506216102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ariazi EA, Ariazi JL, Cordera F, Jordan VC. Estrogen receptors as therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Curr Top Med Chem. 2006;6(3):181–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jordan VC. Tamoxifen: a most unlikely pioneering medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(3):205–213. doi: 10.1038/nrd1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nicholson RI, Johnston SR. Endocrine therapy – current benefits and limitations. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;93(0):3–10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Normanno N, Di Maio M, De Maio E, et al. Mechanisms of endocrine resistance and novel therapeutic strategies in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12(4):721–747. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.00857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ali S, Coombes RC. Endocrine-responsive breast cancer and strategies for combating resistance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(2):101–112. doi: 10.1038/nrc721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rao X, Di Leva G, Li M, et al. MicroRNA-221/222 confers breast cancer fulvestrant resistance by regulating multiple signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2011;30(9):1082–1097. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Felicetti F, Errico MC, Bottero L, et al. The promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger-microRNA-221/-222 pathway controls melanoma progression through multiple oncogenic mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2008;68(8):2745–2754. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pu XX, Huang Gl, Guo HQ, et al. Circulating miR-221 directly amplified from plasma is a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker of colorectal cancer and is correlated with p53 expression. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(10):1674–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen Y-T, Kitabayashi N, Zhou XK, Fahey TJ, III, Scognamiglio T. MicroRNA analysis as a potential diagnostic tool for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(9):1139–1146. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gottardo F, Liu CG, Ferracin M, et al. Micro-RNA profiling in kidney and bladder cancers. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(5):387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Acunzo M, Visone R, Romano G, et al. miR-130a targets MET and induces TRAIL-sensitivity in NSCLC by downregulating miR-221 and 222. Oncogene. 2011 doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Garofalo M, Di Leva G, Romano G, et al. miR-221&222 regulate TRAIL resistance and enhance tumorigenicity through PTEN and TIMP3 downregulation. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(6):498–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 45.Leevers SJ. What goes up must come down. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1(1):E10–E11. doi: 10.1038/8960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li D-M, Sun H. PTEN/MMAC1/TEP1 suppresses the tumorigenicity and induces G1 cell cycle arrest in human glioblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(26):15406–15411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cruz-Munoz W, Khokha R. The Role of Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases in Tumorigenesis and Metastasis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2008;45(3):291–338. doi: 10.1080/10408360801973244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bode W, Reinemer P, Huber R, Kleine T, Schnierer S, Tschesche H. The X-ray crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human neutrophil collagenase inhibited by a substrate analogue reveals the essentials for catalysis and specificity. EMBO J. 1994;13(6):1263–1269. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06378.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ahonen M, Baker AH, KÃhÃri V-M. Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 inhibits invasion and induces apoptosis in melanoma cells. Cancer Res. 1998;58(11):2310–2315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Baker AH, Zaltsman AB, George SJ, Newby AC. Divergent effects of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, -2, or -3 overexpression on rat vascular smooth muscle cell invasion, proliferation, and death in vitro TIMP-3 promotes apoptosis. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(6):1478–1487. doi: 10.1172/JCI1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chun-zhi Z, Lei H, An-ling Z, et al. MicroRNA-221 and microRNA-222 regulate gastric carcinoma cell proliferation and radioresistance by targeting PTEN. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):367. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pineau P, Volinia S, McJunkin K, et al. miR-221 overexpression contributes to liver tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(1):264–269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907904107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang X, Han L, Zhang A, et al. Adenovirus-mediated shRNAs for co-repression of miR-221 and miR-222 expression and function in glioblastoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2011;25(1):97–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pogribny IP, Filkowski JN, Tryndyak VP, Golubov A, Shpyleva SI, Kovalchuk O. Alterations of microRNAs and their targets are associated with acquired resistance of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to cisplatin. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(8):1785–1794. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



