Abstract
Notch signaling regulates a broad spectrum of cell fate decisions and differentiation. Both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions have been demonstrated for Notch signaling. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of its tumor suppressor function. Here we report that expression of Notch3, a member of Notch family transmembrane receptors, was elevated in human cells during senescence activated by various senescence-inducing stimuli. This up-regulation of Notch3 was required for the induction of p21 expression in senescent cells. Down-regulation of Notch3 led to a delayed onset of senescence and extended replicative lifespan, whereas adventitious expression of Notch3 was sufficient to activate senescence and p21 expression. The ability of Notch3 to induce senescence and p21 expression was dependent on the canonical Notch singling. Deletion of p21 in cells significantly attenuated Notch3-induced senescence. Furthermore, a significant decrease in Notch3 expression was observed in human tumor cell lines as well as primary human breast cancer and melanoma samples compared to normal tissues. Restoration of Notch3 expression in human tumor cells resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation and activation of senescence. Collectively, our results reveal a novel function of Notch3 in senescence regulation and tumor suppression.
Keywords: Notch3, senescence, Notch signaling, p21, tumor suppressor
Introduction
Notch proteins are a family of transmembrane receptors that play fundamental roles in many biological processes, including stem cell maintenance, lineage commitment and cell fate determination (1). Notch signaling is initiated through ligand-receptor interaction between neighboring cells, resulting in two successive proteolytic cleavages that release the intracellular domain of Notch (NICD) from membrane. NICD subsequently translocates into nucleus where it associates with transcription factor CBF1/RBP-Jκ in mammals. CBF1 binds to promoters of Notch target genes in a sequence-specific manner and normally acts as a transcriptional repressor in the absence of active Notch signaling. NICD converts CBF1 into a transcriptional activator to transactivate Notch target genes by recruiting Mastermind-like (MAML) family of transcriptional activators and their co-activators (1). Notch receptors share conserved structural features, and the core Notch signaling is evolutionarily and mechanistically conserved. However, it is becoming increasingly evident that the four mammalian Notch receptors (Notch1-4) have distinct non-overlapping functions, and the biological outcome of Notch signaling is determined by cellular context (1, 2).
Notch signaling is often dysregulated during tumorigenesis (1–3). An oncogenic function of Notch signaling has been documented in several types of cancer including leukemia/lymphoma (4–7), breast cancer (8, 9), melanoma (10, 11) and brain tumor (12, 13). It is thought that Notch signaling exerts its oncogenic function by promoting proliferation, blocking differentiation or inhibiting apoptosis (2). Interestingly, Notch signaling has also been implicated to have a tumor suppressor function in myeloid leukemia (14) and solid tumors of skin (15, 16), lung (17), liver (18–20), prostate (21), head and neck (22, 23). The molecular mechanism underlying the tumor suppressor function of Notch signaling is not clear (3). In this report, we identified Notch3 as an important regulator of senescence. As senescence restricts proliferation of cells at risk of malignant transformation (24), our study offers a plausible mechanism underlying Notch3-mediated tumor suppression.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human cell lines (BJ, WS1, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, MCF7, SK-BR-3, A375P, A2058, HT144, T98G, U-87 MG, J82, T24, HeLa and 293T) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Telomerase-immortalized BJ-hTERT and WS1-hTERT were described previously (25). Human fibroblast LF1, telomerase-immortalized human fibroblasts LF1-hTERT and p21−/−-hTERT (26) were kindly provided by Dr. John Sedivy (Brown University). These Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT). Two post-selection HMEC lines, 48R and 184 (both from normal female breasts), were gifts from Dr. Martha Stampfer (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) and were maintained in MEGM medium (Biowhittaker, Lancaster, MA) buffered with HEPES (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to pH7.4. All cells were cultured in a humidified chamber containing 5% CO2 at 37°C
Early passage BJ and WS1 fibroblasts at sub-confluence density were irradiated (10 Gy) using a Cs137 radiator and analyzed a week post irradiation. Similarly, these cells were treated with 1 µM doxorubicin (Sigma) for 2 hr or with 2.5 µM etoposide (Sigma) for 17 hr, and analyzed 24 hr after treatment. Early passage confluent fibroblasts were treated with 250 µM of H2O2 for 2 hr and plated at sub-confluent density 48 hr after treatment. After these treatments, cells entered senescence, as indicated by proliferative arrest and positive staining for senescence-associate β-galactosidase activity.
Plasmids and lentivirus production
Fragments of HA-tagged NICD3 and its deletions were PCR amplified using a construct containing human Notch3 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Anne Joutel, INSERM, France) as template and inserted into pLenti-CMV-Hyg (a gift of Dr. Paul Kowalski, University of Toronto). A NICD1 fragment was released from MSCV-NICD1-IRES-GFP provided by Dr. Nadia Carlesso (Harvard Medical School) and inserted into pLenti-CMV-Hyg. A fragment of DnMAML1-GFP fusion was excised from MSCV-DnMAML1-GFP provided by Dr. Michele Kelliher (University of Massachusetts Medical School) and inserted into pLenti-CMV-IRES-BSD. A p53 expression plasmid pC53-SN3 was provided by Dr. Bert Vogelstein (The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine). A fragment containing human p21 promoter was released from pWWP-Luc (Addgene, Cambridge, MA) and subcloned into pGL3-Basic (Promega, Madison, WI) to create pGL3-p21-Luc. Lentiviral constructs expressing shRNA targeting Notch3 (TRCN0000020238 and TRCN0000020234) were purchased from Open Biosystems (Huntsville, AL) and a scramble shRNA (provided by Dr. Stanley N. Cohen, Stanford University School of Medicine) was used as a control. All constructs were verified by sequencing.
Lentiviral packaging and infection were carried out as described previously (27). Briefly, lentiviral vectors were co-transfected into 293T cells with a plasmid (pMD2.VSV-G) encoding vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) and a plasmid (pCMVdR8.74) encoding packaging proteins. VSV-G pseudotyped virus were collected 48 hr after transfection and used to infect target cells in the presence of 8 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma). Two days later, infected cells were selected with 1 µg/mL puromycin (Sigma), 150 µg/mL hygromycin B (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), or 10 µg/mL blasticidin (Invitrogen).
Senescence assays
Staining of cells with crystal violet and for senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity were carried out as previously described (25). To analyze cell proliferation, cells were seeded at 2×104 per well in 6-well plates, harvested in triplicate and counted every other day for a week using a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). To determine replicative life span, cells were plated at 1–3 × 105 cells per 10-cm dish and subcultured before they reached high cell density. Population doubling (PD) per passage was calculated as log2 (number of cells at time of subculture/number of cells plated). Cumulative PD was plotted against total time in culture to assess replicative life span.
Quantitative RT–PCR
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and reverse-transcribed using Superscript II (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Real-time PCR was carried out using SYBR Green PCR kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The following primers were used: p16 (5’-GCCCAACGCACCGAATAGT-3’ and 5’-CGATGGCCCAGCTCCTCAG-3’), p21 (5’-CCCAAGCTCTACCTTCCCAC-3’ and 5’-ACAGGTCCACATGGTCTTCC-3’), Notch3 (5’-TCTCAGACTGGTCCGAATCCAC-3’ and 5’-CCAAGATCTAAGAACTGACGAGCG-3’) and RNA polymerase II (RPII, 5’-GCACCACGTCCAATGACAT-3’ and 5’-GTGCGGCTGCTTCCATAA-3’). Relative transcript levels of p16, p21 or Notch3 in control cells were set to be 1 after normalization with RPII.
Western blot analysis
Western blot was carried out using total cell lysates as described previously (28). Rabbit polyclonal Notch3 antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide (NPGTPVSPQERPPPYLA) corresponding to C-terminus of human Notch3 (Covance, Denver, PA). Other primary antibodies used in this study were p21 (SX118), p53 (DO-1), Notch1 (mN1A), Hes1 (H-140), HA (Y-11), β-actin (C4), GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), GFP (Roche), and α-tubulin (DM1A, Sigma).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Cells were treated with 1% formaldehyde (Sigma) and cross-linking was carried out at room temperature for 10 minutes. After neutralization with glycine (125 nM), cells were lysed in SDS lysis buffer. Chromatin was sonicated to fragments of ~500 bp, and ChIP with anti-Notch3 antibody or matched IgG as a control was carried out using a ChromaFlash one step ChIP kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY) according to manufacturer’s instruction. After reverse of cross-linking at 65°C for 3 hrs, amplification of the specific region in p21 promoter containing the CBF1 binding site was detected in quantitative PCR with the following primers: F: 5’-TCTGGCCTCAAGATGCTTTG-3’ and R: 5’-CACTCTGGCAGGCAAGGATT-3’. Chromatin before ChIP was used as input for comparison.
Luciferase reporter assay
HeLa cells were plated at 5×104 cells per well in 24-well plate and transiently transfected with 200 ng of indicated NICD or p53 expression plasmid, 100 ng of p21 promoter firefly luciferase reporter construct, and 17 ng of Renilla luciferase plasmid (Promega) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Luciferase activities were determined 48 h after transfection using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Results were represented as the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity and normalized to vector control.
Gene expression, survival and statistical analyses
Notch3 expression (log2 transformed) in microarray datasets of breast cancer (GSE3165) and melanoma (GSE3189 and GSE7553) were retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo), and analyzed with dot plot. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis.
In other experiments, data were presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed and unpaired Student t-test, Spearman’s correlation and two-way ANOVA were used for statistical analyses, with P<0.05 considered as statistically significant.
Results
The expression of Notch3 is increased during senescence
We have previously identified a gene expression signature that is characteristic of replicative senescence in human fibroblasts (29). Notch3, a member of Notch family receptors, is among this list of genes showing elevated expression in senescent fibroblasts in our microarray analysis. Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that Notch3 transcripts were increased in senescent fibroblasts (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, Notch3 protein, in particular the intracellular domain of Notch3 (NICD3, lower band in Fig. 1A), was increased in senescent fibroblasts after serial passage in culture compared to early passage proliferating cells (Fig. 1A). Human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs), similar to fibroblasts (30), entered senescence in culture after experiencing progressive telomere shortening (31). We found that Notch3 expression was increased in senescent HMECs (Fig. 1B), indicating that Notch3 elevation is a common change during replicative senescence activated by telomere shortening. The closely related Notch1 did not show a similar increase in expression (Fig. 1), suggesting a specific change in Notch3 during senescence.
Figure 1.
The expression of Notch3 is elevated in senescent cells. A, quantitative RT-PCR and Western analyses of Notch3 expression in senescent human fibroblasts (S: independent senescent populations) after serial passage in culture compared to early passage (EP) proliferating cells. Error bars were SDs of 3 independent experiments. ***: P<0.001. B, Western analysis of Notch3 expression in senescent HMECs compared to early passage cells. Western analysis of Notch3 and p21 expression in senescent cells induced by (C) H2O2 and (D) ionizing radiation, doxorubicin (Dox) or etoposide (Etop).
In addition to replicative senescence activated by telomere shortening, senescence can be induced by various stress stimuli, such as oxidative stress or DNA damage (32–34). To investigate whether elevated Notch3 expression is unique to replicative senescence or a general response during senescence, we examined Notch3 expression in cells triggered to enter senescence by different senescence-inducing stimuli. Treatment of hydrogen peroxide or DNA damaging agents (ionizing radiation, doxorubicin or etoposide) induced senescence in early passage fibroblasts (25, 32–34). The expression of Notch3 was increased in senescent cells induced by oxidative stress (Fig. 1C) or DNA damage (Fig. 1D), suggesting that elevation of Notch3 is a general response during senescence. Interestingly, we did not observe an increase in the cleaved NICD3 in senescent cells induced by oxidative stress or DNA damage compared to cells entering replicative senescence. The difference may reflect the duration of cells being passaged in culture. In support of this notion, the cleaved NICD3 was also found in telomerase-immortalized fibroblasts (Supplementary Fig. S1), which have been passaged extensively in culture.
Notch3 regulates senescence and p21 expression
Notch1 has been shown to transactivate p21 in mouse keratinocytes (16). Since there is a concomitant increase of Notch3 and p21 in senescent cells (Fig. 1), we investigated whether elevated Notch3 expression is responsible for up-regulation of p21 in senescent cells. Senescent cells were infected with lentivirus to stably express a short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Notch3. Down-regulation of Notch3 by shRNA resulted in decreased p21 expression (Fig. 2A), suggesting that Notch3 is required for elevated p21 expression in senescent cells. Interestingly, the protein level of p53, the known regulator of p21 expression, remained largely unchanged upon Notch3 knockdown (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, down-regulation of Notch3 in mid-passage cells resulted in a delayed onset of replicative senescence and an extended replicative lifespan (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting that Notch3 plays an important role in senescence activation.
Figure 2.
Notch3 activates senescence and p21 expression. A, Western and quantitative RT-PCR analyses of p21 expression in senescent cells after Notch3 was down-regulated by shRNA. A scramble shRNA was used as control. B, replicative life span was determined in serial passage of mid-passage BJ fibroblasts expressing shRNA targeting Notch3 or a scramble shRNA control. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. C to E, Ectopic expression of Notch3 (NICD3) induces senescence and p21 expression in early passage BJ fibroblasts. C, Western and quantitative RT-PCR analyses of p21 expression. D, cell proliferation. E, crystal violet and SA-β-gal staining. 500 cells from randomly selected fields were quantified for SA-β-gal staining. F, ChIP assay of Notch3 binding to the 21 promoter in early passage (EP) or senescent (S) BJ cells. Error bars were SDs of 3 independent experiments. *: P<0.05, **: P<0.01, ***: P<0.001 and NS: not significant.
Conversely, we ectopically expressed NICD3, an active form of Notch3, in early passage fibroblasts to investigate whether Notch3 is sufficient to activate p21 expression and induce senescence. As expected, expression of Hes1, a well-characterized target of Notch signaling, was increased following Notch3 up-regulation (Fig. 2C). Ectopic expression of NICD3 resulted in an increase of p21 at the transcript and protein levels compared to vector controls (Fig. 2C). In contrast, NICD3 only increased the expression of p16, another important regulator of senescence, in WS1 but not BJ cells (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Furthermore, ectopic expression of NICD3 induced senescence in early passage cells, indicated by cessation of proliferation, morphological changes, and positive staining of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity (Fig. 2D, 2E and Supplementary Fig. S3). Collectively, these results indicate that Notch3 is an important regulator of senescence and p21 expression.
In nucleus, NICD associates with transcription factor CBF1, which binds to promoters of Notch target genes through consensus sequence of 5'-GTGGGAA-3' (35). There is a conserved CBF1 binding site in the p21 promoter in human and mouse (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), we found that there was no significant binding of Notch3 on p21 promoter in early passage human fibroblasts, while this binding was significantly increased in senescent cells (Fig. 2F), suggesting that Notch3 directly regulates p21 expression in senescent cells. Consistently, NICD3 transactivated human p21 promoter in a luciferase reporter assay (Supplementary Fig. S4B).
Notch3-induced senescence and p21 expression requires the canonical Notch signaling
To gain further insight into the mechanism of Notch3-induced p21 expression and senescence, we investigated domain(s) in Notch3 that are responsible for its ability to activate senescence and p21 expression. NICD3 or its truncations were ectopically expressed in hTERT-immortalized fibroblasts (Fig. 3A). Similarly to what was observed in early passage cells, up-regulation of Notch3 was sufficient to induce p21 expression and senescence in hTERT-immortalized cells (Fig. 3A, 3B and Supplementary Fig. S5A, S5B). The N-terminal domain (RAM-ANK) was sufficient to induce p21 expression and senescence, whereas deletion of RAM domain (ΔRAM) completely abolished NICD3’s ability to induce p21 expression and senescence (Fig. 3A, 3B and Supplementary Fig. S5A, S5B), indicating that the RAM domain of Notch3 is required to activate p21 expression and senescence.
Figure 3.
Canonical Notch signaling is required for Notch3-induced senescence and p21 expression. A and B, deletions of NICD3 were expressed in BJ-hTERT cells. A, Western analysis of p21 expression. B, crystal violet and SA-β-gal staining. C to F, DnMAML1 and NICD3 were expressed in early passage BJ cells. C, Western analysis of p21 expression. D, proliferation of cells expressing DnMAML1 and NICD3 was compared to those expressing GFP control and NICD3. E, crystal violet and SA-β-gal staining. F, quantitation of SA-β-gal positive cells from 500 randomly selected cells. **: P<0.01 and ***: P<0.001.
NICD associates with CBF1 and recruits Mastermind-like (MAML) family of transcriptional co-activators to transactivate Notch target genes. The RAM domain of NICD is essential for the formation of the CBF1:NICD:MAML ternary complex (36). Our finding that the RAM domain is required for NICD3 to activate p21 expression and senescence led us to hypothesize that Notch3 induces p21 expression and senescence through the canonical Notch signaling. To test this hypothesis, a dominant negative MAML1 (DnMAML1) was used to suppress Notch signaling (37). As expected, Notch3-induced Hes1 expression was attenuated by DnMAML1 (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S5C). Importantly, the ability of NICD3 to induce p21 expression and senescence was inhibited by the expression of DnMAML1 (Fig. 3C–F and Supplementary Fig. S5C–F), indicating that Notch3-induced p21 up-regulation and senescence is dependent on a functional MAML1. Collectively, these results suggest that the canonical Notch signaling is at least partially required for Notch3-induced senescence and p21 expression.
Notch3-induced senescence is partially mediated by p21
As p21 is a critical regulator of senescence (26), our observation that Notch3 induced p21 expression and senescence prompted us to investigate whether p21 is responsible for Notch3-induced senescence. We compared the ability of Notch3 to induce senescence in telomerase-immortalized human fibroblasts LF1 and its derivative p21−/− cells, which were generated through two sequential rounds of targeted homologous recombination (26). Similar to BJ and WS1 fibroblasts, ectopic expression of NICD3 in LF1 cells induced senescence and p21 expression (Fig. 4). However, the ability of Notch3 to induce senescence was significantly attenuated in p21−/− cells, as indicated by increased cell proliferation and decreased SA-β-gal staining compared to the parental LF1 cells (Fig. 4). These results suggest that Notch3-induced senescence is partially mediated by p21.
Figure 4.
Notch3-induced senescence is partially mediated by p21. NICD3 was expressed in hTERT-immortalized p21−/− and parental LF1 fibroblasts. A, Western analysis of p21 expression. B, proliferation of p21−/− cells expressing NICD3 was compared to LF1 cells expressing NICD3. C, crystal violet and SA-β-gal staining. D, quantitation of 500 cells for SA-β-gal staining from randomly selected fields. ***: P<0.001.
Restoration of Notch3 expression inhibited proliferation of human tumor cells
As senescence is an important tumor suppressor (24), the senescence regulatory function of Notch3 suggests that it may act as a tumor suppressor. Exome sequencing of human tumors has identified nonsense and missense mutations in Notch3 in several types of cancer, including breast cancer (38, 39), colorectal cancer (40), melanoma (41, 42), head and neck carcinoma (22), glioblastoma (43), liver (44), lung (39, 45), ovarian (46) and prostate cancer (39, 47). 5.3% (46 out of 871, as of 10/7/2012) of tumor samples reported in the COSMIC database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic) have nonsense and missense mutations in Notch3. Some of these mutations are in the RAM domain, which is required for Notch3 to induce senescence (Fig. 3). In particular, nonsense mutations [K1473* in head and neck carcinoma (22), G1612* in lung squamous cell carcinoma (39), and Q1699* in melanoma (41)] would result in Notch3 without the intracellular domain (K1473* and G1612*) or with truncated RAM domain (Q1699*) that is unable to induce senescence. The loss-of-function mutations in Notch3 found in tumors support its role in senescence regulation and tumor suppression.
As deletion or amplification of Notch3 is not noted in the analyzed tumors, we retrieved Notch3 expression in microarray datasets containing primary human breast cancer and melanoma samples from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: http://www.ncbi.nil.nih.gov/geo). Compared to normal tissues, the expression of Notch3 was significantly decreased in primary breast cancer (Fig. 5A) and melanoma samples (Fig. 5B). In contrast, no significant change in Notch1, Notch2 or Notch4 expression was observed in breast cancer (Supplementary Fig. S6A) or melanoma samples except that Notch2 showed decreased expression in one of two melanoma datasets (Supplementary Fig. S6B, S6C). Furthermore, a significant correlation between Notch3 and p21 expression was observed in these tumor samples (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Figure 5.
Notch3 induces p21 expression and inhibits cell proliferation in human tumor cells. Dot-plot of Notch3 expression in (A) primary human breast cancer dataset GSE3165 and (B) human melanoma datasets. One-way ANOVA was used to compare tumors with normal tissues. C, Western analysis of Notch3 and Notch1 expression in human tumor cell lines. A non-specific band of Notch3 is indicated by an arrow. D, Western analysis of p21 expression. E, proliferation of breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), melanoma (A375P) and glioblastoma (T98G) cells expressing NICD3. ***: P<0.001.
We noticed that Notch3 was undetectable in several human tumor cell lines (Fig. 5C). When NICD3 was ectopically expressed in 3 tumor (breast cancer, melanoma and glioblastoma) cell lines without detectable Notch3 protein, p21 expression was effectively induced (Fig. 5D). It is interesting that Notch3 induced p21 expression in MDA-MB-231 and T98G cells, because these cells express only mutant p53 protein lacking the transactivation function (48, 49). This finding, together with the observation of unchanged p53 level upon Notch3 knockdown in normal fibroblasts (Fig. 2A), suggests that Notch3 induces p21 expression independently of p53. More importantly, restoration of Notch3 expression led to inhibition of cell proliferation and senescence in these tumor cells (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Fig. S8), suggesting that loss of Notch3 expression allows the escape of senescence and thus plays a critical role in tumor development.
Discussion
In this report, we found that the expression of Notch3 was elevated in senescent cells activated by various senescence-inducing stimuli, including telomere shortening, DNA damage and oxidative stress. Down-regulation of Notch3 impaired the senescence response and attenuated p21 expression, whereas ectopic expression of Notch3 was sufficient to induce senescence and p21 expression in early passage, telomerase-immortalized or tumor cells, indicating that Notch3 plays a critical role in regulating senescence. As senescence is an important tumor suppressor (24), this novel function of Notch3 suggests that it acts as a tumor suppressor. Consistent with this notion, loss-of-function mutations in Notch3 that are unable to induce senescence are identified in several types of cancer. In addition, we found that the expression of Notch3 was significantly decreased in primary human breast cancer and melanoma samples compared to normal control tissues. Moreover, we found that ectopic expression of Notch3 in tumor cell lines that normally do not express Notch3 led to growth arrest and senescence. Collectively, these results reveal a novel function of Notch3 in senescence regulation and tumor suppression.
Different Notch receptors show distinct patterns of expression during senescence. We found that Notch3 showed up-regulation during senescence in fibroblasts and mammary epithelial cells. In contrast, the closely-related Notch1 showed decreased expression in senescent fibroblasts and unchanged expression in senescent HMECs (Fig. 1). Notch1 has also been shown to be down-regulated in senescent keratinocytes (50) but increased in senescent endothelial cells (51). Notch1 induces apoptosis in fibroblasts (52), neural progenitor cells (53) and B cells (54, 55), while activates senescence in endothelial cells (51) when constitutively expressed. We tried multiple times to express Notch1 in early passage fibroblasts and were unable to establish stable cell lines expressing Notch1, consistent with the previous finding that Notch1 induces apoptosis in fibroblasts (52). It is becoming increasingly evident that the four mammalian Notch receptors have distinct non-overlapping functions, even though the core Notch signaling initiated by them is thought to be evolutionarily and mechanistically conserved (1, 2). The outcome of Notch signaling is highly dependent on cellular context, and Notch signaling has been found to have both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions in cancer. For instance, an oncogenic role for Notch1 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is well established (6, 7), whereas Notch1 is found to be a tumor suppressor in skin cancer, myeloid leukemia and head and neck cancer (14–16, 22, 23). It is thought that Notch signaling exerts its oncogenic function by promoting proliferation, blocking differentiation or inhibiting apoptosis (2), whereas the molecular mechanism underlying the tumor suppressor function of Notch signaling is not entirely clear (3). The senescence regulation function of Notch3 identified in this study provides a molecular mechanism underlying the tumor suppressor function of Notch3. Different Notch receptors play different, even opposing roles in tumor development, demonstrating the complexity of Notch signaling in cancer. As targeting Notch signaling is suggested for cancer therapeutics, our study points to unwanted dire consequence if Notch signaling is indiscriminately targeted. Understanding the specific role of different Notch receptors in cancer development offers a better option in targeting specific Notch receptor for cancer therapeutics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Nadia Carlesso, Stanley N. Cohen, Anne Joutel, Michele Kelliher, Paul Kowalski, John Sedivy, Martha Stampfer and Bert Vogelstein for kindly providing reagents. This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01CA131210) and The Ellison Medical Foundation (AG-NS-0347-06) to H.Z.
Footnotes
Disclosure of potential conflicts of Interest: No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed
References
- 1.Wilson A, Radtke F. Multiple functions of Notch signaling in self-renewing organs and cancer. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:2860–2868. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Radtke F, Raj K. The role of Notch in tumorigenesis: oncogene or tumour suppressor? Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:756–767. doi: 10.1038/nrc1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dotto GP. Notch tumor suppressor function. Oncogene. 2008;27:5115–5123. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rohn JL, Lauring AS, Linenberger ML, Overbaugh J. Transduction of Notch2 in feline leukemia virus-induced thymic lymphoma. J Virol. 1996;70:8071–8080. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.11.8071-8080.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bellavia D, Campese AF, Alesse E, Vacca A, Felli MP, Balestri A, et al. Constitutive activation of NF-kappaB and T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in Notch3 transgenic mice. Embo J. 2000;19:3337–3348. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JPt, Silverman LB, Sanchez-Irizarry C, et al. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science. 2004;306:269–271. doi: 10.1126/science.1102160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ellisen LW, Bird J, West DC, Soreng AL, Reynolds TC, Smith SD, et al. TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell. 1991;66:649–661. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90111-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dievart A, Beaulieu N, Jolicoeur P. Involvement of Notch1 in the development of mouse mammary tumors. Oncogene. 1999;18:5973–5981. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jhappan C, Gallahan D, Stahle C, Chu E, Smith GH, Merlino G, et al. Expression of an activated Notch-related int-3 transgene interferes with cell differentiation and induces neoplastic transformation in mammary and salivary glands. Genes Dev. 1992;6:345–355. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.3.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Balint K, Xiao M, Pinnix CC, Soma A, Veres I, Juhasz I, et al. Activation of Notch1 signaling is required for beta-catenin-mediated human primary melanoma progression. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3166–3176. doi: 10.1172/JCI25001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu ZJ, Xiao M, Balint K, Smalley KS, Brafford P, Qiu R, et al. Notch1 signaling promotes primary melanoma progression by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathways and up-regulating N-cadherin expression. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4182–4190. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Purow BW, Haque RM, Noel MW, Su Q, Burdick MJ, Lee J, et al. Expression of Notch-1 and its ligands, Delta-like-1 and Jagged-1, is critical for glioma cell survival and proliferation. Cancer research. 2005;65:2353–2363. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fan X, Mikolaenko I, Elhassan I, Ni X, Wang Y, Ball D, et al. Notch1 and notch2 have opposite effects on embryonal brain tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7787–7793. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klinakis A, Lobry C, Abdel-Wahab O, Oh P, Haeno H, Buonamici S, et al. A novel tumour-suppressor function for the Notch pathway in myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2011;473:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature09999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nicolas M, Wolfer A, Raj K, Kummer JA, Mill P, van Noort M, et al. Notch1 functions as a tumor suppressor in mouse skin. Nature genetics. 2003;33:416–421. doi: 10.1038/ng1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rangarajan A, Talora C, Okuyama R, Nicolas M, Mammucari C, Oh H, et al. Notch signaling is a direct determinant of keratinocyte growth arrest and entry into differentiation. The EMBO journal. 2001;20:3427–3436. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sriuranpong V, Borges MW, Ravi RK, Arnold DR, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB, et al. Notch signaling induces cell cycle arrest in small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer research. 2001;61:3200–3205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Croquelois A, Blindenbacher A, Terracciano L, Wang X, Langer I, Radtke F, et al. Inducible inactivation of Notch1 causes nodular regenerative hyperplasia in mice. Hepatology. 2005;41:487–496. doi: 10.1002/hep.20571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Viatour P, Ehmer U, Saddic LA, Dorrell C, Andersen JB, Lin C, et al. Notch signaling inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma following inactivation of the RB pathway. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1963–1976. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Qi R, An H, Yu Y, Zhang M, Liu S, Xu H, et al. Notch1 signaling inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma through induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8323–8329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shou J, Ross S, Koeppen H, de Sauvage FJ, Gao WQ. Dynamics of notch expression during murine prostate development and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2001;61:7291–7297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, Kostic AD, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, et al. The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science. 2011;333:1157–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.1208130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, Bettegowda C, Chang K, Li RJ, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333:1154–1157. doi: 10.1126/science.1206923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120:513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang H, Cohen SN. Smurf2 up-regulation activates telomere-dependent senescence. Genes Dev. 2004;18:3028–3040. doi: 10.1101/gad.1253004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown JP, Wei W, Sedivy JM. Bypass of senescence after disruption of p21CIP1/WAF1 gene in normal diploid human fibroblasts. Science. 1997;277:831–834. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5327.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang H, Teng Y, Kong Y, Kowalski PE, Cohen SN. Suppression of human tumor cell proliferation by Smurf2-induced senescence. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215:613–620. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kong Y, Cui H, Zhang H. Smurf2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Id1 regulates p16 expression during senescence. Aging Cell. 2011;10:1038–1046. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00746.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang H, Pan KH, Cohen SN. Senescence-specific gene expression fingerprints reveal cell-type-dependent physical clustering of up-regulated chromosomal loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3251–3256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2627983100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt SE, Chiu CP, Morin GB, et al. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science. 1998;279:349–352. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Romanov SR, Kozakiewicz BK, Holst CR, Stampfer MR, Haupt LM, Tisty TD. Normal human mammary epithelial cells spontaneously escape senescence and acquire genomic changes. Nature. 2001;409:633–637. doi: 10.1038/35054579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen Q, Fischer A, Reagan JD, Yan LJ, Ames BN. Oxidative DNA damage and senescence of human diploid fibroblast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:4337–4341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Robles SJ, Adami GR. Agents that cause DNA double strand breaks lead to p16INK4a enrichment and the premature senescence of normal fibroblasts. Oncogene. 1998;16:1113–1123. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Di Leonardo A, Linke SP, Clarkin K, Wahl GM. DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2540–2551. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.21.2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tun T, Hamaguchi Y, Matsunami N, Furukawa T, Honjo T, Kawaichi M. Recognition sequence of a highly conserved DNA binding protein RBP-J kappa. Nucleic acids research. 1994;22:965–971. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.6.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nam Y, Weng AP, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Structural requirements for assembly of the CSL.intracellular Notch1.Mastermind-like 1 transcriptional activation complex. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:21232–21239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301567200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Weng AP, Nam Y, Wolfe MS, Pear WS, Griffin JD, Blacklow SC, et al. Growth suppression of pre-T acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by inhibition of notch signaling. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23:655–664. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.2.655-664.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kan Z, Jaiswal BS, Stinson J, Janakiraman V, Bhatt D, Stern HM, et al. Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. Nature. 2010;466:869–873. doi: 10.1038/nature09208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:330–337. doi: 10.1038/nature11252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wei X, Walia V, Lin JC, Teer JK, Prickett TD, Gartner J, et al. Exome sequencing identifies GRIN2A as frequently mutated in melanoma. Nat Genet. 2011;43:442–446. doi: 10.1038/ng.810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nikolaev SI, Rimoldi D, Iseli C, Valsesia A, Robyr D, Gehrig C, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 mutations in melanoma. Nat Genet. 2011;44:133–139. doi: 10.1038/ng.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guichard C, Amaddeo G, Imbeaud S, Ladeiro Y, Pelletier L, Maad IB, et al. Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44:694–698. doi: 10.1038/ng.2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, Mardis ER, McLellan MD, Cibulskis K, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455:1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature07423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–615. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grasso CS, Wu YM, Robinson DR, Cao X, Dhanasekaran SM, Khan AP, et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2012;487:239–243. doi: 10.1038/nature11125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.O'Connor PM, Jackman J, Bae I, Myers TG, Fan S, Mutoh M, et al. Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with the growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4285–4300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Van Meir EG, Kikuchi T, Tada M, Li H, Diserens AC, Wojcik BE, et al. Analysis of the p53 gene and its expression in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 1994;54:649–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Perera RJ, Koo S, Bennett CF, Dean NM, Gupta N, Qin JZ, et al. Defining the transcriptome of accelerated and replicatively senescent keratinocytes reveals links to differentiation, interferon signaling, and Notch related pathways. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98:394–408. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Venkatesh D, Fredette N, Rostama B, Tang Y, Vary CP, Liaw L, et al. RhoA-mediated signaling in Notch-induced senescence-like growth arrest and endothelial barrier dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:876–882. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.221945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ishikawa Y, Onoyama I, Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Notch-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking Fbxw7. Oncogene. 2008;27:6164–6174. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yang X, Klein R, Tian X, Cheng HT, Kopan R, Shen J. Notch activation induces apoptosis in neural progenitor cells through a p53-dependent pathway. Dev Biol. 2004;269:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Romer S, Saunders U, Jack HM, Jehn BM. Notch1 enhances B-cell receptor-induced apoptosis in mature activated B cells without affecting cell cycle progression and surface IgM expression. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:833–844. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Morimura T, Goitsuka R, Zhang Y, Saito I, Reth M, Kitamura D. Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by Notch1 in B cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36523–36531. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006415200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.