Abstract
Human APOBEC3A (A3A) is a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) cytidine deaminase that restricts viral pathogens and endogenous retrotransposons and plays a role in the innate immune response. Furthermore, its potential to act as a genomic DNA mutator has implications for a role in carcinogenesis. A deeper understanding of A3A’s deaminase and nucleic acid binding properties, which is central to its biological activities, has been limited by the lack of structural information. Here, we report the NMR solution structure of A3A and show that the critical interface for interaction with ssDNA substrates includes residues extending beyond the catalytic center. Importantly, by monitoring deaminase activity in real time, we find that A3A displays similar catalytic activity on A3A-specific TTCA- or A3G-specific CCCA-containing substrates, involving key determinants immediately 5′ of the reactive C. Our results afford novel mechanistic insights into A3A-mediated deamination and provide the structural basis for further molecular studies.
INTRODUCTION
The human APOBEC3 (A3) proteins are a family of deoxycytidine deaminases that convert dC residues in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to dU and act as DNA mutators. These proteins, which play an important role in the innate immune response, function as host restriction factors and display a broad range of activities against endogenous and exogenous retroelements1–3. There are seven members in the A3 family, each having one (A3A, A3C, A3H) or two (A3B, A3D, A3F, A3G) zinc (Zn)-binding domains with HX1EX23–24CX2–4C motifs, where X is any amino acid4. The histidine and cysteine residues coordinate Zn2+, while glutamic acid is thought to function as a proton shuttle during the deaminase reaction5.
The single-domain A3A protein, the subject of this study, has multiple activities. A3A degrades foreign DNA introduced into human cells6,7 and blocks replication of exogenous viruses such as human papilloma virus8, Rous sarcoma virus9, parvoviruses10,11, and human T-lymphotropic virus type 112. In addition, it strongly inhibits retrotransposition of LINE-1, Alu, and LTR retroelements10,13–16 that cause insertional mutations. Unlike A3G17, A3A is capable of deaminating 5-methylcytosine18,19, an epigenetic marker in genomic DNA, as well as inducing cell cycle arrest20 and somatic hypermutation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs in a dynamic interplay between A3 editing and DNA catabolism20,21. How all these activities are regulated, however, is not fully understood, although Tribbles 3, a human protein, was recently reported to protect nuclear DNA from A3A-mediated deamination22.
A3A is highly expressed in cells of the myeloid lineage, such as monocytes and macrophages, and its expression is upregulated by treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN- α)10,23–26. Interestingly, silencing of A3A in monocytes is associated with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection, suggesting that the presence of A3A may be protective against HIV-123. Recent studies indicate that endogenous A3A in macrophages restricts HIV-1 replication by reducing synthesis of viral DNA during reverse transcription27. This result is consistent with an independent observation that HIV-1 transcripts in IFN-α-treated infected macrophages appear to be edited predominantly by A3A28.
Although abundant information on the biological activities of the A3 proteins has been reported, only limited structural data are available. For example, the structure of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of A3G, which contains the catalytic center for its deaminase activity17,29,30, was solved by NMR31–33 and X-ray crystallography34,35, but the structure of full-length A3G has been more elusive. While this manuscript was in preparation, the X-ray structure of another single-domain A3 protein, A3C, was reported36.
Given human A3A’s function as an inhibitor of retroviruses and retroelements with significant effects on cellular activities, the availability of an atomic, three-dimensional structure clearly is of significant importance. Here we report the NMR solution structure of human A3A, define the interface that is critical for its interaction with single-stranded oligonucleotide substrates, and characterize its catalytic activity. Detailed analysis of A3A binding to nucleic acids and real-time monitoring of the deamination reaction by NMR allow us to propose a mechanism for substrate selection and specificity. These studies provide the structural basis for a deeper understanding of A3A’s biological activities and broaden our knowledge of the molecular properties of the A3 proteins.
RESULTS
Biochemical characterization of purified A3A
To ensure that the purified, recombinant wild-type A3A (199 aa), (containing a C-terminal His6-tag (LEHHHHHH)), was enzymatically active, a uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG)-dependent gel-based deaminase assay was performed (Fig. 1a,b). The catalytic activity of this tagged protein was evaluated using a fluorescently labeled 40-nt ssDNA substrate, containing the TTCA deaminase recognition site, in the presence of increasing concentrations of protein, ranging from 20 to 1000 nM. Over 50% of the substrate was converted to the deaminated product with as little as 20 nM A3A and complete conversion was seen with 200 nM A3A. These results demonstrate that the recombinant A3A protein is highly active as a cytidine deaminase.
Binding of A3A to ssDNA and ssRNA was evaluated in electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) experiments with 32P-labeled 40-nt oligonucleotides and varying concentrations of A3A (Fig. 1c,d). Complexes are seen at A3A concentrations of ≥50 μM with ssDNA (Fig. 1c, lane 4) and ≥20 μM with ssRNA (Fig. 1d, lane 15). To achieve ~50% complexation, 2-fold more A3A (80 μM) was required for ssDNA (Fig. 1c, lane 7), compared to ssRNA (40 μM) (Fig. 1d, lane 17), suggesting that A3A has a somewhat higher binding affinity for ssRNA than to ssDNA. Estimated Kd values of ~80 μM for the A3A-ssDNA complex agree well with values derived from NMR titration data (see below).
NMR sample preparation and behavior in solution
Full-length A3A was monomeric and soluble up to ~0.2 mM at pH 6.5, 200 mM NaCl, and the 1H-15N HSQC spectrum exhibited well dispersed, narrow resonances (Fig. 2). Nearly complete backbone and side chain assignments were obtained using unlabeled, uniformly 15N-, 13C/15N-, and 2H/13C/15N-labeled A3A with specific-protonations (see METHODS) for three different conditions: (1) ~0.2 mM A3A at pH 6.5, 200 mM NaCl (Fig. 2); (2) ~0.2 mM A3A at pH 6.9; and (3) ~0.3 mM A3A at pH 8.1, all in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer. Since essentially identical NOE patterns and chemical shifts were observed for the different conditions (only the amide resonances exhibited small, pH-dependent chemical shift differences), the structure was assumed to be unaffected by these different conditions. A mutant A3A, L63N/C64S/C171Q, was also used to help resolve ambiguous assignments (see METHODS).
A3A structure
The structure of full-length A3A was calculated based on 3279 NMR-derived experimental constraints. The final model satisfies all experimental constraints, displays excellent covalent geometry, and the 30-conformer ensemble exhibits atomic r.m.s. deviations of 0.60±0.05 and 1.18±0.05 Å with respect to the mean coordinate positions for the backbone (N, Cα, C′) and all heavy atoms, respectively (Table 1). A stereo-view of the ensemble of conformers as well as a ribbon representation of the lowest energy structure from the ensemble are depicted in Fig. 3a&b, respectively.
Table 1.
Number of NOE distance constraints | |
Intra-residue (i−j=0) | 1114 |
Sequential (|i−j|=1) | 655 |
Medium range (2≤|i−j|≤4) | 309 |
Long range (|i−j|≥5) | 749 |
Total | 2827 |
Number of hydrogen bond constraints | 152 |
Number of dihedral angle constraints | |
φ | 151 |
ψ | 149 |
Total | 300 |
Structural Quality | |
Violationsa | |
Distances constraints (Å) | 0.016 ± 0.002 |
Dihedral angles constraints (°) | 0.299 ± 0.037 |
Deviation from idealized covalent geometry | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.001 ± 0.000 |
Bond Angles (°) | 0.398 ± 0.006 |
Improper torsions (°) | 0.222 ± 0.005 |
Average r.m.s.d. of atomic coordinates (Å)b | |
Backbone heavy atoms | 0.60 ± 0.05 |
All heavy atoms | 1.18 ± 0.05 |
Ramachandran plot analysis (%)c | |
Most favorable region | 73.7 ± 2.3 |
Additional allowed regions | 22.5 ± 2.6 |
Generously allowed regions | 2.9 ± 1.1 |
Disallowed regions | 0.9 ± 0.6 |
No individual member of the ensemble exhibited distance violations >0.5 Å or dihedral angle violations >5 °
Average r.m.s. deviation of atomic coordinates for residues (11–57 and 70–194) with respect to the mean structure. A3A regions (1–9, 58–69 and 195–199) were excluded from the statistics because they exhibit a flexible, random-coil conformation.
Statistics were calculated using PROCHECK for full-length A3A (residues 1–199).
Overall, the A3A structure consists of six helices surrounding a central β sheet of 5 strands (Fig. 3a,b), common to all APOBEC proteins whose structures are known, i.e., A3G-CTD, A3C, and A2 (Supplementary Table S1). The structured region of A3A is limited to residues 10-194 (Fig. 3a,b) since very intense, sharp amide resonances, exhibiting random-coil chemical shifts (Fig. 2), are present for the N-terminal nine (1–9) and final five (195–199) residues in the A3A sequence as well as the His6-tag residues, indicating a substantial degree of flexibility. In addition to the termini, the loop connecting β2′ and α2 (loop 3, residues 57–70) (Fig. 3a) is also highly plastic and undergoes motions on an intermediate (μ-msec) timescale, since many amide resonances exhibit severe line broadening and are of low intensity (Q58, N61, L62) or entirely missing (A59, Y67, and G68) in the 1H-15N HSQC spectrum (Fig. 2). This is suggestive of multiple conformations undergoing chemical exchange.
Comparison with other APOBEC protein structures
We carried out a detailed comparison of the present A3A solution structure with other available structures of APOBEC proteins (Supplementary Table S1). Among these structures, the present A3A NMR structure is most similar to the X-ray structure of the A3G-CTD quintuple mutant (residues 191-384, PDB: 3IR2)35 (Fig. 3c,d), exhibiting an average pair-wise backbone atomic r.m.s. difference of 1.86 Å. The next closest structures are the X-ray structures of wild-type A3C, another single-domain human A3 protein (1-190, PDB: 3VOW)36, and wild-type A3G-CTD (residues 197-380, PDB: 3E1U/3IQS)34, both exhibiting average backbone r.m.s. differences of ~2.3–2.4 Å. The NMR solution structures of monomeric A2 proteins (murine A2, PDB: 2RPZ, and a CS-HM Rosetta model for human A237) are also similar to A3A (atomic r.m.s. differences of ~3.4 Å). In the previously solved A3G-CTD structures, some local differences were reported31–34. Our current A3A structure clearly possesses an interrupted β2 strand (β2-bulge-β2′) (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. S1), as well as an N-terminal α-helix (α1, residues 15–21).
A more detailed comparison was carried out between the current A3A and the most similar A3G-CTD structures (A3G191-384-2K3A; Fig. 3c,d and Supplementary Table S1). We focused on the regions around the active site where the A3A and A3G sequences differ. A two-amino acid (W104 and G105) insertion, located between two zinc-coordinating cysteines (C101 and C106) in the active site in A3A, is the most prominent sequence change. Despite this insertion, the positions of the catalytic site residues H70 (H257 in A3G), E72 (E259), C101 (C288), and C106 (C291) are very similar in both structures (Fig. 3c). The insertion, however, distorts the N-terminal end of helix α3, with W104 bulging out, causing positioning of the backbone and/or sidechain atoms of S103 and G105 in A3A equivalent to those of F289 and S290 in A3G. This structural adjustment places the hydrophobic F102 and W104 side chains at the protein surface, next to the active site. In contrast, A3G possesses only one hydrophobic residue (F289) in this region. Loop 7 is located near the active site (Fig. 3), and its C-terminal half in A3G is known to play an important role in substrate selection (TC or CC)38. In A3A, loop 7 (127–135) adds additional hydrophobic residues (Y132, P134, and L135), while in A3G two of the equivalent residues (D317 and R320) are polar, and the proline is replaced by glycine, resulting in conformational differences between the A3A and A3G loop 7 (Fig. 3c). Note that among the human A3 proteins, the polar character of this region is unique for A3G (Fig. 3e).
A3A interacts with dCTP and dUTP
Although A3A is a well-known cytidine deaminase, the determinants of substrate specificity (i.e., preferential recognition of TC7,10,39) have not been characterized in detail. As an initial approach, we investigated binding of A3A to dCTP, several ssDNA oligonucleotide substrates and/or their dU containing products by NMR.
dUTP (Fig. 4a) and dCTP (Fig. 4e) binding was monitored by 1H-15N HSQC spectroscopy and affected regions were mapped onto the A3A structure (insets). Perturbations of amide resonances of the active site amino acids H70, E72, C101, and C106 as well as other surrounding ones (K30, L55, H56, N57, Q58, K60, N61, L63, C64, H70, A71, W98, S99, and Y132) were very similar, indicating that both the substrate and the product bind to the active site. Several of the amino acids whose resonances were affected reside in loop 3, with N61, L63, and C64 located distal to the active site, indicating that a remote conformational change was induced by dCTP/dUTP binding or that a particular preferred conformation was selected from the flexible ensemble in the substrate-free A3A state. Titration curves of selected perturbed resonances upon dCTP (Fig. 4e) and dUTP (Fig. 4a) binding were used to extract Kd values of 536±72 and 578±115 μM, respectively (Table 2). Note that since up to 30% of the dCTP was converted to dUTP during the titration, the value for dCTP should be regarded as an approximation.
Table 2.
Nucleotide sequences | Kd (μM) | KM (μM) | kcat (1/min) | kcat/KM (1/M•s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
dCTP | 536±72 | 600c | 0.033±0.003c | 0.91 |
dUTP | 578±115 | |||
dATTTCATTT | 58±8b | 66±7 | 71±6 | 1.8 × 104 |
dATTATTTCATTTATT | 57±11b | 62±5 | 66±5 | 1.8 × 104 |
dATTTCA | 184±20b | 210±17 | 65±6 | 5.2 × 103 |
dTCATTT | 194±18b | 219±29 | 55±5 | 4.2 × 103 |
dAAACCCAAA | 91±15b | 100c | 20±3d | 3.3 × 103 |
dAAACCAAAA | 94±11b | 100c | 13±4d | 2.2 × 103 |
dAAACAAAAA | 161±19b | 192±32 | 5.5±1.1 | 4.7 × 102 |
Dissociation constants (Kd) and catalytic constants (Michaelis-Menten) derived from NMR data at 25 °C (pH 6.9), as described in METHODS.
he Kd values for these dC-containing oligonucleotides reflect values for their dU-containing products since these substrates are rapidly deaminated under the NMR experimental conditions (A3A ~ 0.1mM).
Since accurate measurements of KM are precluded when more than one dC is present, the KM values of these substrates are assumed to be similar to the Kd values and are set to 100 (Kd values rounded up to the nearest hundred). This assumption is based on data obtained with substrates containing a single dC.
kcat values are derived from the initial rate in a sample with 1000 μM substrate and 0.197 μM A3A.
A3A binds ssDNA substrates via an extended surface
The interaction of ATTTCATTT (~0.1–3 mM) with A3A (~0.15 mM) under our NMR conditions resulted in conversion to ATTTUATTT within <1 min, rendering it impossible to measure a true Kd value for ATTTCATTT. However, given the similarity between dUTP and dCTP binding to A3A (Fig. 4a vs. 4e), it seemed reasonable to assume that ATTTUATTT and ATTTCATTT would also have similar binding properties. The Kd value for the ATTTUATTT product was 58±8 μM (Fig. 4b, Table 2), and its interaction surface on the A3A structure (Fig. 4b, inset) covers a larger surface, extending beyond the catalytic site.
This extended interface involves an area to the left side of the active site, opposite of loop 3 (where residues are colored in hot pink (Δδ>0.050 p.p.m.) or cyan (Δδ between 0.028 and 0.050 p.p.m.) in the ribbon diagram). Interestingly, the two-residue insertion (W104/G105), unique to A3A, is part of the interface: the W104 backbone amide (Δδ=0.122 p.p.m.) and the W104 e1 side chain resonance (Δδ=0.079 p.p.m.) as well as the G105 (Δδ=0.066 p.p.m.) and S103 (Δδ=0.072 p.p.m.) amide resonances exhibit the largest perturbations. In addition, loop 7 and helix α4 are also part of the extended interface, since effects on the amide resonances of residues D133 (Δδ=0.112 p.p.m.), L135 (Δδ=0.102 p.p.m.), and E138 (Δδ=0.079 p.p.m.) were observed. Additional binding studies of A3A using a 15-nt oligonucleotide, ATTATTTUATTTATT yielded essentially the same binding site (Fig. 4c, inset) and affinity (Kd=57±11 μM) (Fig. 4c, Table 2) as found with the 9-mer.
Although smaller perturbations were observed for some additional resonances, these changes were non-saturable and most likely reflect non-specific binding (e.g., the I17 resonance marked by a dashed line in Fig. 4c). The non-specific binding site of the 15-mer oligonucleotide mapped onto the A3A structure involves residues 12–19 (α1), 36–37, 40–42 (β1), 44–49 (β2), 53–56 (β2′) and 179–186 (α6) (Supplementary Fig. S2). To validate the binding data, the interaction of an A3A catalytic site mutant, E72Q, with a 15-nt substrate (ATTATTTCATTTATT) was evaluated. The mutant exhibited the same affinity (Kd=55±11 μM, data not shown) as wild-type A3A with the ATTATTTUATTTATT product, confirming that binding of substrate and product occurs with essentially identical affinities.
Further titration experiments using smaller oligonucleotides (ATTT(C/U)A, Fig. 4d; TCATTT, Fig. 4f) delineated a binding site similar to the one observed with the nonanucleotide. This implies that three nucleotides, (TCA), constitute the essential moiety for binding to A3A. The affinities of the hexanucleotides, however, were ~3-fold weaker (Kd~190 μM) than the one measured for ATTT(C/U)ATTT (Kd=58±8 μM) (Table 2), suggesting a stabilizing effect of the flanking nucleotides in the complex.
Interaction of A3A with a 9-nt substrate, AAACCCAAA, containing the A3G deaminase-specific recognition site2, maps to the same surface (Fig. 4g, inset) as ATTT(C/U)ATTT (Fig. 4b, inset). This suggests that both dT and dC at the -1 and -2 positions, i.e., pyrimidine bases, can interact with the extended interface next to the catalytic site of A3A. However, slightly weaker binding (Kd=91±15 μM, Fig. 4g, Table 2) was observed for AAACCCAAA compared to ATTTCATTT. Replacement of the central CCC in AAACCCAAA by CCA (AAACCAAAA, Fig. 4h) or CAA (AAACAAAAA, Table 2) resulted in identical (Kd=94±11 μM) or slightly weaker (Kd=161±19 μM) affinities, respectively.
Structural model for A3A-ssDNA complexes
Model structures of the A3A-oligonucleotide complexes were created by flexible docking40 and selecting binding poses compatible with chemical shift perturbations (see METHODS for details). Initial docking results for ATTTCATTT and AAACCCAAA indicated that only the central region of the oligonucleotides interacts specifically with A3A, leaving the two ends free. Therefore, we only generated final structural models of A3A with the pentanucleotides TTCAT (Fig. 5a) and CCCAA (Fig. 5b). In the A3A/TTCAT complex model, the central reactive C occupies the deep pocket delineated by the active site and surrounding residues T31, N57, Q58, H70, E72, W98, C101, C106, D131 and the zinc ion. The thymidine (T-1) immediately preceding the C interacts with a surface formed by residues D133, P134, L135 (loop 7) and F102 (loop 5), while T-2 contacts residues F102, S103, W104, and G105 (loop 5), L135 (loop 7), and E138 (α4). The adenosine (A+1) at the 3′ side of the C interacts with residues D131, Y132, and D133 (loop 7). The 5-methyl groups of T-1 and T-2 are in close contact with several hydrophobic residues, e.g., F102, W104, and L135, suggesting that this hydrophobic interaction may contribute to tighter binding of TTCA- compared to CCCA-containing ssDNA. The model for the A3A/CCCAA complex (Fig. 5b) is very similar to that of A3A/TTCAT (Fig. 5a), including the localization of the individual nucleotides.
Deamination by real-time NMR
The A3A-catalyzed deamination reaction with several substrates was followed by 2D 1H- 13C HSQC (Fig. 6a) or 1D 1H (Fig. 6b–d) NMR. Using dCTP as the substrate we determined that slow, but measurable deaminase activity is present (Fig. 6a): at 25 °C, 5.2 mM dCTP was completely converted to dUTP by 170 μM A3A in ~50 h. Longer substrates, such as the 9-nt ATTTCATTT, were deaminated much more rapidly (Fig. 6b), and in such cases, 1D 1H NMR spectroscopy was used (Fig. 6b inset). The 9-nt substrate (0.98 mM) was completely deaminated by 0.196 μM A3A in ~1.7 h with an initial rate of ~0.8 mM/h. Other substrates, a 15-mer, ATTATTTCATTTATT, and two hexanucleotides, ATTTCA and TCATTT, (Supplementary Fig. S3a–c, respectively) exhibited essentially identical rates to that observed with the nonanucleotide.
A3A and A3G purportedly possess a difference in substrate specificity2,6,7,10,39,41. To quantify A3A’s substrate specificity, we also assayed the deamination of an A3G-specific substrate, AAAC-2C-1CAAA, by A3A. Interestingly, all three cytidines were deaminated in a sequential 3′→5′ manner (Fig. 6c), with the third dC (C) converted with an initial rate of ~0.2 mM/h, only four-fold slower than the dC in the A3A-specific ATTTCATTT substrate. When comparing substrates with varying numbers of cytosines, such as AAACCCAAA (Fig. 6c), AAACCAAAA (Fig. 6d), and AAACAAAAA (Supplementary Fig. S3d), deamination of the 3′ dC (C) was about 2- to 4-fold faster in AAACCCAAA than in the other two substrates, indicating a preference for two pyrimidine bases at the 5′ side of the reactive C.
We also noted that the kinetics of the C→U conversions of C-1 and C-2 are much slower, quite distinct from that of C in the reaction with the AAAC-2C-1CAAA substrate. Similar behavior was observed with AAAC-2C-1UAAA (Supplementary Fig. S3e), a substrate containing a uridine instead of the most reactive C. In contrast, when dC is followed by dA, and not by dU, e.g., the C in AAAC-1CAAA (Fig. 6d) and AAACAAAAA (Supplementary Fig. S3d), the reaction proceeds readily, albeit somewhat slower than with AAAC-2C-1CAAA (Fig. 6c). Given our observation that dC and dU essentially possess the same A3A binding affinities and interfaces, it seems reasonable to assume that once dC is converted to dU, competitive binding and inhibition occurs, slowing the deamination of C-1 and C-2 in AAAC-2C-1UAAA. Therefore, optimal substrates for A3A contain a cytidine preceded by two pyrimidine bases and followed by an adenine, i.e., (T/C)(T/C)CA.
Further studies were performed to determine the catalytic constants for A3A deaminase activity on single-cytidine containing substrates, i.e., ATTTCATTT, ATTATTTCATTTATT, ATTTCA, TCATTT, and AAACAAAAA. The kinetics of deamination revealed that all TCA-containing oligonucleotide substrates, regardless of length, exhibited identical turn-over rates (kcat ~60–70/min) (Table 2, Fig. 6e–g) k. The hexanucleotides, however, displayed a ~3-fold lower apparent second order rate constant (cat/KM ~5 × 103/M•s) than the one measured for the 9-nt and 15-nt substrates (kcat/KM ~1.8 × 104/M•s), caused mainly by an increase in KM. For all A3A substrates, KM and Kd values were very similar. A large reduction (~40-fold) of kcat/KM was seen only with a substrate that is lacking pyrimidine bases at the 5′ side of the reactive C, i.e., AAACAAAAA, caused by a large (13-fold) reduction in kcat and a small (~3-fold) increase in KM (less-favorable binding), highlighting the importance of a pyrimidine base at the 5′ side.
Collectively, the data in Fig. 6 demonstrate that the nucleotide context surrounding the reactive C is a major determinant of enzymatic activity.
DISCUSSION
Here, we present the NMR solution structure of human A3A as well as a detailed analysis of its nucleic acid interaction surface, providing new insights into substrate selection and binding. The A3A NMR structure very closely resembles the A3G-CTD and A3C X-ray structures31–36 (Supplementary Table S1) and not surprisingly, there are also similarities between the activities of A3A and the A3G-CTD. Using NMR, we show that A3A binds TTCA- or CCCA-containing single-stranded oligonucleotides (≥9 nt) with Kd values ranging from 50–100 μM (Table 2), in excellent agreement with binding affinity data (~80 μM) estimated from EMSA (Fig. 1c) and with fluorescence depolarization results obtained by Love et al39.
Intriguingly, A3A binds ssDNA much more weakly (~1000-fold) than A3G, for which Kd values ranging from 50 to 240 nM have been reported17,39,42–44. However, like A3A, Kd values in the μM range (200–450 μM) were obtained for the single-domain A3G-CTD protein31,32, implying that the tighter binding of full-length A3G is associated with its double domain structure. Indeed, the A3G-NTD contains numerous positively charged amino acids that contribute to high efficiency binding to ssDNA17,29, whereas both A3A and the A3G-CTD are slightly acidic and are unable to interact in this manner.
Importantly, titration of A3A with diverse ssDNA substrates by NMR made it possible to distinguish specific binding from non-specific binding (Fig. 4c). Our results showed that A3A can bind both TTCA- and CCCA-containing oligonucleotides, using the same five A3A contacts, namely the active site, loop 3, loop 5 including the exposed di-peptide W104-G105, loop 7, and helix α4. Surprisingly, although the W104NεH side chain resonance experiences the largest chemical shift changes upon substrate binding (Fig. 4), W104 mutations do not seem to influence or abrogate A3A’s catalytic activity16,18.
Note that A3A oligonucleotide-binding regions are highly localized and clustered around the active site, in stark contrast to results in the two studies that mapped ssDNA binding to A3G-CTD31,32. Importantly, our A3A-ssDNA complex model (Fig. 5) suggests that the DNA bends to insert the reactive cytidine into the active site, permitting only the immediate neighboring (−1, −2, and +1) nucleotides to interact locally near the catalytic site. Interestingly, there are reports of RNA bending in the crystal structure of a tRNA adenosine deaminase/RNA complex45 and DNA contraction during A3G scanning of the ssDNA substrate46.
NMR real-time kinetic data for the deamination reaction of A3A using ATTTCATTT and ATTATTTCATTT as substrates yielded values of kcat ~70 min−1 and KM ~60 μM, which differ from the values (kcat ~15 min−1 and KM ~230 nM) obtained using a 43-nt TTCT-containing ssDNA18. These differences may be related to variations in the ssDNA sequences and experimental conditions. Interestingly, Carpenter et al. reported that A3A is a stronger (~200-fold) deaminase than full-length A3G18. Indeed, although similar amounts of deaminase product were observed in the NMR deamination assays described here for A3A (Fig. 6b) and for A3G-CTD in Furukawa et al.32, the amount of A3A used was 1000-fold less than the amount of A3G-CTD.
The fact that A3A also deaminates the most 3′ dC (C) in AAACCCAAA (thought to be an A3G-specific substrate2) with only a ~5-fold reduction in kcat/KM, compared to TTCA-containing 9-nt and 15-nt oligonucleotides (Table 2) appears puzzling at first. However, these results are in agreement with the deaminase specificity observed for A3A in cell-based assays. For example, in an investigation of foreign DNA restriction in human primary cells, A3A preferentially deaminated TC and CC sequences in the green fluorescent protein gene of the transfected plasmid DNA6. In addition, a strong bias for deamination of TC (~50–70%) and CC (~15–25%) dinucleotide sequences was detected in nascent HIV-1 cDNAs isolated from infected macrophages28 and in an in vitro HIV-1 model replication assay, performed using purified A3A protein39. Furthermore, a preference for TC and CC substrate recognition sites was also observed for A3A editing of HTLV-112. Thus, A3A’s active site possesses the flexibility to accommodate and deaminate dC residues (C) in both TC and CC dinucleotides.
Interestingly, in a study by Shinohara et al.7, it was shown that A3A mediates genomic DNA editing in human cells, but no editing site preference was detected. In contrast, Suspène et al.21 found that A3A preferentially deaminates cytidines in TC and CC dinucleotides in genomic DNA, when cells are exposed to uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. APOBEC-mediated genomic DNA mutations have been implicated in carcinogenesis47 and for example, A3B was shown to be a source of DNA mutations in breast cancer48. These observations suggest that the strong mutagenic potential of A3A might be detrimental to the stability of the human genome.
Thus, the dual function of A3A as a host restriction factor and as a DNA mutator that can potentially act on genomic DNA, an activity that may be associated with malignancies, suggests that A3A can act as a “double-edged sword”. The high resolution NMR structure of A3A presented here is a first step in aiding future structure-function studies for addressing these seemingly diverse A3A functions. Furthermore, the addition of the A3A structure to the still limited list of currently known APOBEC structures contributes to efforts towards elucidating the molecular mechanisms of the innate immune response.
METHODS
Protein expression and purification
Wild-type (Accession number NM_145699), E72Q and L63N/C64S/C171Q mutant synthetic A3A genes with a C-terminal His6-tag (LEHHHHHH) were inserted into the NdeI-XhoI site of the pET21 plasmid (Novagen) for expression in E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3). Uniform 15N- and 13C-labeling of the proteins was carried out by growth in modified minimal medium at 18 °C using 15NH4Cl and 13C6-glucose as the sole nitrogen and carbon sources, respectively. Uniform 2H-, 15N- and 13C-labeling of the proteins was achieved using 2H2O, 15NH4Cl and 13C6/2H7-glucose as deuterium, nitrogen and carbon sources, with two different selective protonation of the side chains of (1) Tyr/Phe/Ile residues and (2) Tyr/Phe/Trp/Ile/Val/Leu residues, by adding 0.10–0.15 mg of 13C/15N-tyrosine, -phenylalanine and -isoleucine (for sample 1) and 13C/15N-tyrosine and -phenylalanine, unlabeled tryptophan, 2-keto-butyrate (1,2,3,4-13C, 98%; 3,3′-2H, 98%, CIL, Andover, MA) and 2-keto-3-methyl-butyrate (1,2,3,4-13C, 99%; 3,4,4′,4″-2H, 98%, CIL) (for sample 2), respectively. These chemicals were added to the culture 1 h prior to induction with 0.4 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (total induction time=16 h). Proteins were purified over a 5-ml Hi-Trap His column (GE Healthcare) and Hi-Load Superdex 200 (1.6 cm × 60 cm) column, equilibrated in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, and 0.02% NaN3. Fractions containing A3A were further purified over an 8-ml MONO-Q column (GE Healthcare) in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5), 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, and 0.02% sodium azide, employing a linear gradient of 0–1 M NaCl. The final A3A preparations were >99% pure, as estimated by SDS-PAGE. The molecular mass of the A3A proteins were confirmed by LC-ESI-TOF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA).
Multi-angle light scattering
Size-exclusion chromatography/multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) data were obtained at room temperature using an analytical Superdex 200 (S200) column with inline multi-angle light scattering, refractive index (Wyatt Technology, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) and UV (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) detectors. 100-μl of 78.4 μM A3A were applied to the S200 column pre-equilibrated and eluted with 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 200 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, and 1 mM DTT at a flow-rate of 0.5 ml/minute.
Deaminase assay using fluorescent tagged ssDNA substrates
Deaminase assay conditions were adapted from Iwatani et al.17. Forty-μl reactions, containing 180 nM of a 40-nt ssDNA (JL913, 5′-ATT ATT ATT ATT ATT ATT ATT TCA TTT ATT TAT TTA TTT A-3′), labeled at its 5′ end with Alexa Fluor® 488, (Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) [Coralville, IA]) and varying amounts of A3A in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and 10 units of E. coli UDG [New England BioLabs]) were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by incubation with Proteinase K (40 μg, Ambion) at 65 °C for 20 min, followed by sequential addition of 10 μl of 1 N NaOH for 15 min at 37 °C and 10 μl of 1N HCl. Ten-μl aliquots of the final mixture were subjected to electrophoresis in a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Gels were scanned in fluorescence mode on a Typhoon 9400 Imager and the data were quantified using ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
Ten-μl reactions, containing varying amounts of A3A, 20 nM of a 5′ 32P-labeled 40-nt ssDNA (JL895, identical sequence to JL913 but without the Alexa Fluor® 488 label) (Lofstrand) or 40-nt ssRNA (JL931, identical sequence to JL895, except that U was substituted for T) (IDT), were incubated with 4 U SUPERaseIN (Ambion) at 37 °C for 10 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% Ficoll-400, and 2.5 mM EDTA. Aliquots from each reaction were loaded onto an 8% native polyacrylamide gel in 40 mM Tris-acetate buffer, pH 8.4, 1 mM EDTA, and 5% glycerol. One μl of DNA Loading Gel Solution (Quality Biological, Inc.), containing bromphenol blue and xylene cyanole, was added to a control sample without A3A. Gels were run at 4 °C (5 mA) until the bromphenol blue dye had migrated ~2/3 through the gel. Radioactive products were detected with a Typhoon 9400 Imager and were quantified using ImageQuant software.
NMR Spectroscopy
All NMR spectra for the structure determination of A3A were recorded at 25 °C on Bruker AVANCE900, AVANCE800, AVANCE700, and AVANCE600 spectrometers, equipped with 5-mm triple-resonance, z-axis gradient cryoprobes. The NMR samples contained unlabeled, 13C/15N- or 2H/13C/15N-labeled A3A with two types of selective protonations (see above). At pH 6.9 and 8.1, A3A showed higher solubility (~0.5 and ~1 mM, respectively) than at pH 6.5 (~0.2 mM). However, at these higher protein concentrations, aggregation occurred. We therefore performed all of our NMR experiments at concentrations of ~0.2–0.3 mM. The sample temperature in the spectrometer was calibrated with 100% methanol. Backbone and side chain resonance assignments were carried out using 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 1H-13C HSQC and NOESY and 3D HNCACB, HN(CO)CACB, HNCA, HN(CO)CA and HCCH-TOCSY experiments49. Distance constraints were derived from 3D simultaneous 13C- and 15N-edited NOESY50 and 2D NOESY experiments. All NOESY spectra were acquired at 800 or 900 MHz, using a mixing time of 100 ms (non-perdeuterated samples) or 150 ms (perdeuterated samples). Spectra were processed with TOPSPIN 2.1 (Bruker) and NMRPipe51 and analyzed using SPARKY3 (version 3.113) (T.D. Goddard and D.G. Kneller, University of California, San Francisco) and NMRView J (version 8.0.3)52.
NMR structure calculation
All NOE cross peaks were assigned from the 3D and 2D NOESY spectra using the SPARKY3 assignment tool. Structure calculations were performed for A3A residues 1–199, using the anneal.py protocol in XPLOR-NIH53. An iterative approach with extensive, manual cross-checking of all distance constraints against the NOESY data and the generated structures was employed. The final number of the NMR-derived constraints were 3279, with 2827 NOE distances, 152 H-bond distances, identified from NOE patterns for helices and β-sheets, and 300 φ and ψ backbone torsion angles from TALOS calculations54. In addition, a Zn2+ ion was added at a late stage in the calculations to coordinate with H70, C101 and C10631,32 using constraints based on the X-ray structures of A3G-CTD34,35. 512 structures were generated and the 30 lowest energy structures were selected and analyzed using PROCHECK-NMR55 (Table 1). All structure figures were generated with MOLMOL56.
A3A nucleotide binding site mapping and titration by NMR
To monitor nucleotide binding to A3A, aliquots of 14–100 mM mono or oligodeoxynucleotide stock solutions were added to 0.10–0.18 mM 13C/15N-labeled A3A. 100 mM dCTP and dUTP stock solutions were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI) and HPLC-purified DNA oligonucleotides were obtained from IDT or MIDLAND Co. (Midland, TX). A series of 2D 1H-15N HSQC titration spectra were acquired and binding isotherms were obtained by plotting 1HN proton chemical shift change vs. nucleotide concentrations for 5–8 unambiguously traceable amide resonances. Dissociation constants were calculated by nonlinear best fitting of the isotherms using KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software, Reading, PA) and values for 5–8 resonances were averaged.
Real-time studies of A3A-catalyzed deamination
A series of 2D 1H-13C HSQC and/or 1D 1H NMR spectra were acquired as a function of time, after addition of A3A to solutions of mono or oligodeoxynucleotide. Concentrations of A3A and deoxynucleotides for the different samples are provided in the Figure captions. The intensities of well-resolved 13C-5-1H resonances (volumes in 2D 1H-13C HSQC spectra) and/or 1H-5 resonances (integrals in 1D 1H spectra) of cytosine and uracil were used for quantitation. Real-time monitoring of the A3A-catalyzed deamination reaction by NMR permitted the extraction of initial (<5%→dC dU conversion) rates for a series of substrate concentrations (50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 μM). kcat (Vmax/[A3A]) and KM values were obtained using the Michaelis-Menten module in Kaleidagraph.
Molecular docking
Structures of TTCAT, CCCAA, ATTTCATTT, and AAACCCAAA ssDNAs were generated by MacroMoleculeBuilder (version 2.8)57. The oligonucleotide and A3A NMR structures were converted to a mol2 file format using the Hermes program (version 1.4) and standard Tripos atom and bond types. Docking was performed with the flexible docking program GOLD version 5.140, in combination with the Chemscore scoring function58. The zinc ion was chosen as the center point in the docking and the radius was set to 20 Å. For each nucleotide, five independent docking runs into the five lowest energy NMR structures of A3A, each producing fifty binding poses, were performed using a population of 100 ligands, with a maximal number of genetic algorithm operations dependent on ligand size: 50000 for TTCAT and CCCAA and 150000 for ATTTCATTT and AAACCCAAA. 1250 docking poses for the pentanucleotides were subjected to a two-step selection process utilizing the NMR data. In the first step, complexes were discarded if the oligonucleotide engaged in contacts with residues that did not exhibit experimental chemical shift changes. In the second step, structures were selected that exhibited good agreement with the NMR binding-site mapping data, taking the size of the chemical shift changes and the scoring value of the binding pose into account. The final structural models for A3A, complexed with TTCAT (Fig. 5a) and CCCAA (Fig. 5b), represent ~80% of all the structures that result from the selection process.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Maria DeLucia for help with A3A purification, Doug Bevan and Phil Greer for computer technical support, and Michael J. Delk for NMR instrumental support. J.H. acknowledges financial support by an International Outgoing Fellowship of the European Community program “Support for training and career development of researchers (Marie Curie)”, under Contract No. PIOF-GA-2009-235902. This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health NIGMS Grant P50GM082251 (A.M.G.) and the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (M.M., K.H., and J.G.L.).
Footnotes
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
The study was conceived by A.M.G. and J.G.L. The NMR experiments were designed by A.M.G. and I.-J.L.B.; I.-J.L.B. and C.-H.B. performed experiments and data analysis; I.-J.L.B. and A.M.G. interpreted the NMR data; J.A., L.M.C., and C.-H.B. prepared purified A3A; J.H. built structural models of A3A, complexed with short oligonucleotides; the biochemical assays were designed by J.G.L., M.M., and K.H.; M.M. and K.H. performed the experiments and M.M., K.H., and J.G.L. analyzed the results; the manuscript was written by I.-J.L.B., M.M., J.G.L., and A.M.G.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
ACCESSION CODES
The A3A atomic coordinates and NMR constraints have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank under accession code 2m65, and the NMR chemical shift data have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank under accession code 19108.
References
- 1.Chiu YL, Greene WC. The APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases: an innate defensive network opposing exogenous retroviruses and endogenous retroelements. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:317–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Malim MH. APOBEC proteins and intrinsic resistance to HIV-1 infection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:675–687. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Duggal NK, Emerman M. Evolutionary conflicts between viruses and restriction factors shape immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:687–95. doi: 10.1038/nri3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jarmuz A, et al. An anthropoid-specific locus of orphan C to U RNA-editing enzymes on chromosome 22. Genomics. 2002;79:285–296. doi: 10.1006/geno.2002.6718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Betts L, Xiang S, Short SA, Wolfenden R, Carter CW., Jr Cytidine deaminase. The 2.3 Å crystal structure of an enzyme: transition-state analog complex. J Mol Biol. 1994;235:635–656. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stenglein MD, Burns MB, Li M, Lengyel J, Harris RS. APOBEC3 proteins mediate the clearance of foreign DNA from human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:222–229. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shinohara M, et al. APOBEC3B can impair genomic stability by inducing base substitutions in genomic DNA in human cells. Sci Rep. 2012;2:806. doi: 10.1038/srep00806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vartanian JP, Guetard D, Henry M, Wain-Hobson S. Evidence for editing of human papillomavirus DNA by APOBEC3 in benign and precancerous lesions. Science. 2008;320:230–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1153201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wiegand HL, Cullen BR. Inhibition of alpharetrovirus replication by a range of human APOBEC3 proteins. J Virol. 2007;81:13694–13699. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01646-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen H, et al. APOBEC3A is a potent inhibitor of adeno-associated virus and retrotransposons. Curr Biol. 2006;16:480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Narvaiza I, et al. Deaminase-independent inhibition of parvoviruses by the APOBEC3A cytidine deaminase. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000439. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ooms M, Krikoni A, Kress AK, Simon V, Münk C. APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, and APOBEC3H haplotype 2 restrict human T-lymphotropic virus type 1. J Virol. 2012;86:6097–6108. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06570-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bogerd HP, et al. Cellular inhibitors of long interspersed element 1 and Alu retrotransposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8780–8785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603313103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muckenfuss H, et al. APOBEC3 proteins inhibit human LINE-1 retrotransposition. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:22161–22172. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601716200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kinomoto M, et al. All APOBEC3 family proteins differentially inhibit LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:2955–2964. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bulliard Y, et al. Structure-function analyses point to a polynucleotide- accommodating groove essential for APOBEC3A restriction activities. J Virol. 2011;85:1765–1776. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01651-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iwatani Y, Takeuchi H, Strebel K, Levin JG. Biochemical activities of highly purified, catalytically active human APOBEC3G: correlation with antiviral effect. J Virol. 2006;80:5992–6002. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02680-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carpenter MA, et al. Methylcytosine and normal cytosine deamination by the foreign DNA restriction enzyme APOBEC3A. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:34801–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.385161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wijesinghe P, Bhagwat AS. Efficient deamination of 5-methylcytosines in DNA by human APOBEC3A, but not by AID or APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:9206–17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Landry S, Narvaiza I, Linfesty DC, Weitzman MD. APOBEC3A can activate the DNA damage response and cause cell-cycle arrest. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:444–450. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Suspène R, et al. Somatic hypermutation of human mitochondrial and nuclear DNA by APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases, a pathway for DNA catabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4858–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009687108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aynaud MM, et al. Human Tribbles 3 Protects Nuclear DNA from Cytidine Deamination by APOBEC3A. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:39182–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.372722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peng G, et al. Myeloid differentiation and susceptibility to HIV-1 are linked to APOBEC3 expression. Blood. 2007;110:393–400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-051763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koning FA, et al. Defining APOBEC3 expression patterns in human tissues and hematopoietic cell subsets. J Virol. 2009;83:9474–9485. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01089-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Refsland EW, et al. Quantitative profiling of the full APOBEC3 mRNA repertoire in lymphocytes and tissues: implications for HIV-1 restriction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4274–4284. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thielen BK, et al. Innate immune signaling induces high levels of TC-specific deaminase activity in primary monocyte-derived cells through expression of APOBEC3A isoforms. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:27753–27766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.102822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Berger G, et al. APOBEC3A is a specific inhibitor of the early phases of HIV-1 infection in myeloid cells. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002221. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koning FA, Goujon C, Bauby H, Malim MH. Target cell-mediated editing of HIV-1 cDNA by APOBEC3 proteins in human macrophages. J Virol. 2011;85:13448–13452. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00775-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Navarro F, et al. Complementary function of the two catalytic domains of APOBEC3G. Virology. 2005;333:374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Newman EN, et al. Antiviral function of APOBEC3G can be dissociated from cytidine deaminase activity. Curr Biol. 2005;15:166–170. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen KM, et al. Structure of the DNA deaminase domain of the HIV-1 restriction factor APOBEC3G. Nature. 2008;452:116–119. doi: 10.1038/nature06638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Furukawa A, et al. Structure, interaction and real-time monitoring of the enzymatic reaction of wild-type APOBEC3G. EMBO J. 2009;28:440–451. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Harjes E, et al. An extended structure of the APOBEC3G catalytic domain suggests a unique holoenzyme model. J Mol Biol. 2009;389:819–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Holden LG, et al. Crystal structure of the anti-viral APOBEC3G catalytic domain and functional implications. Nature. 2008;456:121–124. doi: 10.1038/nature07357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shandilya SMD, et al. Crystal structure of the APOBEC3G catalytic domain reveals potential oligomerization interfaces. Structure. 2010;18:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kitamura S, et al. The APOBEC3C crystal structure and the interface for HIV- 1 Vif binding. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:1005–10. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Krzysiak TC, Jung J, Thompson J, Baker D, Gronenborn AM. APOBEC2 is a monomer in solution: implications for APOBEC3G models. Biochemistry. 2012;51:2008–17. doi: 10.1021/bi300021s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bransteitter R, Prochnow C, Chen XS. The current structural and functional understanding of APOBEC deaminases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:3137–3147. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0070-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Love RP, Xu H, Chelico L. Biochemical analysis of hypermutation by the deoxycytidine deaminase APOBEC3A. J Biol Chem. 2012 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.393181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins. 2003;52:609–23. doi: 10.1002/prot.10465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aguiar RS, Lovsin N, Tanuri A, Peterlin BM. Vpr.A3A chimera inhibits HIV replication. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:2518–2525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706436200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chelico L, Pham P, Calabrese P, Goodman MF. APOBEC3G DNA deaminase acts processively 3′--> 5′ on single-stranded DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:392–399. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nowarski R, Britan-Rosich E, Shiloach T, Kotler M. Hypermutation by intersegmental transfer of APOBEC3G cytidine deaminase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:1059–66. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Iwatani Y, et al. Deaminase-independent inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcription by APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7096–7108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Losey HC, Ruthenburg AJ, Verdine GL. Crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus tRNA adenosine deaminase TadA in complex with RNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:153–9. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Senavirathne G, et al. Single-stranded DNA scanning and deamination by APOBEC3G cytidine deaminase at single molecule resolution. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:15826–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.342790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roberts SA, et al. Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions. Mol Cell. 2012;46:424–35. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Burns MB, et al. APOBEC3B is an enzymatic source of mutation in breast cancer. Nature. 2013;494:366–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Clore GM, Gronenborn AM. Determining the structures of large proteins and protein complexes by NMR. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:22–34. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sattler M, Maurer M, Schleucher J, Griesinger C. A Simultaneous 15N, 1HHSQC and 13C, 1H-HSQC with sensitivity enhancement and a heteronuclear gradient-echo. J Biomol NMR. 1995;5:97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00227475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Delaglio F, et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Johnson BA, Blevins RA. Nmr View - a Computer-Program for the Visualization and Analysis of Nmr Data. J Biomol NMR. 1994;4:603–614. doi: 10.1007/BF00404272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brunger AT, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998;54 ( Pt 5):905–21. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cornilescu G, Delaglio F, Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J Biomol NMR. 1999;13:289–302. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392405740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR. 1996;8:477–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00228148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:51–5. 29–32. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Flores SC, Sherman MA, Bruns CM, Eastman P, Altman RB. Fast flexible modeling of RNA structure using internal coordinates. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2011;8:1247–57. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2010.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1997;11:425–45. doi: 10.1023/a:1007996124545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.