Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1974 Oct;54(4):463–471. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.4.463

Fifty Years of Progress in Water Relations Research

Paul J Kramer a
PMCID: PMC367435  PMID: 16658910

Abstract

Many of the basic concepts dealing with soil and plant water relationships were in existence 50 years ago, but were inadequately presented in the textbooks of that time. There has been a marked increase in the amount of work done in this field during recent decades, but much of it involves advances in understanding the concepts already in existence. Three of the most important advances in the field of water relations are: (a) acceptance of the term, water potential, to describe the free energy status of water in soil and plants; (b) marked improvement in methods of measuring water potential and stomatal resistance; and (c) use of the concept of water flow in the soil-plant system as analogous to flow of electricity in a conducting system.

A number of interesting and important problems remain to be studied. Of these, probably the most important is to learn why mild water stress of less than - 10 bars can affect various enzyme-mediated metabolic processes. Plant scientists in applied fields also need to learn more about the causes of differences in ability to tolerate drought among plants of various kinds. There is uncertainty concerning the relative magnitude of the resistances to water flow in various parts of the soil-plant system and concerning the causes of the apparent changes in resistance to water flow with increase in rate and with time of day. More information also is needed concerning the role of growth regulators synthesized in roots and the importance of the older, suberized roots in the absorption of water and mineral nutrients.

Full text

PDF
463

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beth Kirkham M., Gardner W. R., Gerloff G. C. Regulation of cell division and cell enlargement by turgor pressure. Plant Physiol. 1972 Jun;49(6):961–962. doi: 10.1104/pp.49.6.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyer J. S., Bowen B. L. Inhibition of oxygen evolution in chloroplasts isolated from leaves with low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1970 May;45(5):612–615. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.5.612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyer J. S. Free-energy transfer in plants. Science. 1969 Mar 14;163(3872):1219–1220. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3872.1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer J. S. Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):233–235. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brevedan E. R., Hodges H. F. Effects of Moisture Deficits on C Translocation in Corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. 1973 Nov;52(5):436–439. doi: 10.1104/pp.52.5.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clements H. F. SIGNIFICANCE OF TRANSPIRATION. Plant Physiol. 1934 Jan;9(1):165–172. doi: 10.1104/pp.9.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curtis O. F. WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF TRANSPIRATION? Science. 1926 Mar 12;63(1628):267–271. doi: 10.1126/science.63.1628.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DeMichele D. W., Sharpe P. J. An analysis of the mechanics of guard cell motion. J Theor Biol. 1973 Sep 14;41(1):77–96. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90190-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekern P. C. Evapotranspiration of Pineapple in Hawaii. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jul;40(4):736–739. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fiscus E. L. A digital diffusion porometer circuit. Plant Physiol. 1974 Jan;53(1):47–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiscus E. L. In situ measurement of root-water potential. Plant Physiol. 1972 Jul;50(1):191–193. doi: 10.1104/pp.50.1.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner W. R., Nieman R. H. Lower Limit of Water Availability to Plants. Science. 1964 Mar 27;143(3613):1460–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3613.1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoffman G. J., Rawlins S. L. Silver-Foil Psychrometer for Measuring Leaf Water Potential in situ. Science. 1972 Sep 1;177(4051):802–804. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4051.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Humble G. D., Raschke K. Stomatal opening quantitatively related to potassium transport: evidence from electron probe analysis. Plant Physiol. 1971 Oct;48(4):447–453. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.4.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jordan W. R., Ritchie J. T. Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiol. 1971 Dec;48(6):783–788. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kanemasu E. T., Thurtell G. W., Tanner C. B. Design calibration and field use of a stomatal diffusion porometer. Plant Physiol. 1969 Jun;44(6):881–885. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.6.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lemon E., Stewart D. W., Shawcroft R. W. The Sun's Work in a Cornfield. Science. 1971 Oct 22;174(4007):371–378. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4007.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Läuchli A., Spurr A. R., Epstein E. Lateral Transport of Ions into the Xylem of Corn Roots: II. Evaluation of a Stelar Pump. Plant Physiol. 1971 Aug;48(2):118–124. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.2.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McMichael B. L., Jordan W. R., Powell R. D. An effect of water stress on ethylene production by intact cotton petioles. Plant Physiol. 1972 Apr;49(4):658–660. doi: 10.1104/pp.49.4.658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Richards L. A., Ogata G. Thermocouple for Vapor Pressure Measurement in Biological and Soil Systems at High Humidity. Science. 1958 Oct 31;128(3331):1089–1090. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3331.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Safir G. R., Boyer J. S., Gerdemann J. W. Nutrient status and mycorrhizal enhancement of water transport in soybean. Plant Physiol. 1972 May;49(5):700–703. doi: 10.1104/pp.49.5.700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thone F. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AT THE ITHACA CONGRESS. Plant Physiol. 1926 Oct;1(4):i4–305. doi: 10.1104/pp.1.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Veihmeyer F. J., Hendrickson A. H. SOIL MOISTURE AT PERMANENT WILTING OF PLANTS. Plant Physiol. 1928 Jul;3(3):355–357. doi: 10.1104/pp.3.3.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Went F. W. EFFECT OF THE ROOT SYSTEM ON TOMATO STEM GROWTH. Plant Physiol. 1943 Jan;18(1):51–65. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu G. H., Kramer P. J. Radial transport of ions in roots. Plant Physiol. 1969 Aug;44(8):1095–1100. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.8.1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zabadal T. J. A water potential threshold for the increase of abscisic Acid in leaves. Plant Physiol. 1974 Jan;53(1):125–127. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES