Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2013 Jun;87(12):6840–6850. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00734-13

Rotavirus-Encoded Nonstructural Protein 1 Modulates Cellular Apoptotic Machinery by Targeting Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Rahul Bhowmick a, Umesh Chandra Halder a, Shiladitya Chattopadhyay a, Mukti Kant Nayak b, Mamta Chawla-Sarkar a,
PMCID: PMC3676122  PMID: 23576507

Abstract

p53, a member of the innate immune system, is triggered under stress to induce cell growth arrest and apoptosis. Thus, p53 is an important target for viruses, as efficient infection depends on modulation of the host apoptotic machinery. This study focuses on how rotaviruses manipulate intricate p53 signaling for their advantage. Analysis of p53 expression revealed degradation of p53 during initial stages of rotavirus infection. However, in nonstructural protein-1 (NSP1) mutant strain A5-16, p53 degradation was not observed, suggesting a role of NSP1 in this process. This function of NSP1 was independent of its interferon or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT modulation activity since p53 degradation was observed in Vero cells as well as in the presence of PI3K inhibitor. p53 transcript levels remained the same in SA11-infected cells (at 2 to 14 h postinfection), but p53 protein was stabilized only in the presence of MG132, suggesting a posttranslational process. NSP1 interacted with the DNA binding domain of p53, resulting in ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of p53. Degradation of p53 during initial stages of infection inhibited apoptosis, as the proapoptotic genes PUMA and Bax were downregulated. During late viral infection, when progeny dissemination is the main objective, the NSP1-p53 interaction was diminished, resulting in restoration of the p53 level, with initiation of proapoptotic signaling ensuing. Overall results highlight the multiple strategies evolved by NSP1 to combat the host immune response.

INTRODUCTION

The p53 protein was first identified in simian virus 40-transformed cells as a T antigen-associated cellular protein and characterized as the first vertebrate oncogene on the basis of its sequence similarity to the cancer-causing gene of a chicken retrovirus (13). Although from the initial days of discovery p53 was related to cancer and coined a tumor suppressor gene, recent studies have delineated its role in other aspects of life, such as the development, life expectancy, and overall fitness of an organism (4). p53 is a stress-responsive transcription factor that controls genes involved in the cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, and angiogenesis (5). Since p53 is an important regulator of cellular processes, the level of p53 is controlled by several complex mechanisms and feedback loops. Under unstressed condition, p53 remains in the hypophosphorylated form, which gets degraded by the MDM2 protein; however, in response to stress, phosphorylation of p53 occurs, resulting in inactivation of ubiquitin (Ub)-mediated degradation, which leads to rapid p53 accumulation in the nucleus, where it functions as a transcription factor.

For evading host antiviral machinery and creating a beneficial environment for viral replication and dissemination, viruses have evolved measures to target key cellular genes, such as interferon-regulatory factor3 (IRF3) (6), p53 (7), the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) (8), and NF-κB (9). By targeting p53, viruses can control an important innate immune response, namely, apoptosis, for their own advantage. There are reports of virus-induced downregulation of p53 by degradation (1012), inactivation of p53 transactivation (13, 14), as well as stabilization of p53 (1517), depending on the virus type or stage of viral replication.

Rotavirus, a Reoviridae family member, is the most important etiologic agent of severe infantile (age, <5 years) nonbacterial diarrhea in humans worldwide (18). It is a nonenveloped icosahedral structured virus having 11 segments of double-stranded RNA which remain concealed by 6 structural proteins (VP1 to VP4, VP6, VP7). In addition, the virus produces 6 nonstructural proteins (NSP1 to NSP6) after infection. These mainly control the host machinery and play a vital role in establishing infection by carrying out diverse functions. Among them, NSP1, an RNA binding protein (18), has been shown to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT-mediated antiapoptotic pathway (19) as well as to inhibit innate immune responses by degradation of IRFs and RIG-I (20, 21), resulting in efficient virus infection and replication. In addition to its ability to bind the p85 subunit of PI3K for activation of AKT, much circumstantial evidence putatively suggests that NSP1 also has ubiquitin ligase properties (22, 23).

Ubiquitination is the main process for intracellular protein degradation in eukaryotes (24). Ubiquitin ligases recognize and bind to target proteins and label them with ubiquitin, which is recognized by the proteasomal machinery. In spite of reports on the significance of p53 during virus infection, especially in oncogenic viruses, not much is known about its role in the self-limitation of enteric viruses, such as rotavirus. In our study, we show that during initial stages of rotavirus infection, the NSP1 protein targets p53 for ubiquitination and degradation, resulting in an antiapoptotic atmosphere in the infected cell, but during late infection, the interaction between p53 and NSP1 is diminished, resulting in activation of the p53-regulated protein Bax and PUMA, leading to induction of apoptosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Viruses, cells, and viral infection.

Monkey kidney (MA104) cells were cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM). Cells of the human embryonic kidney epithelial cell line (HEK293T [293T]) and Vero cell line were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1× PSF (penicillin, streptomycin, and amphotericin B [Fungizone]) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Rotavirus strains SA11 and A513 and NSP1 mutant strain A5-16 (gifts from N. Kobayashi, Japan) were used in this study. For infection, viruses were activated with acetylated trypsin (10 g/ml) at 37°C for 30 min and added to the cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 for 45 min at 37°C. Unbound virus was removed by washing with medium, and infection was continued in fresh MEM supplemented with acetylated trypsin and antibiotic. The time of virus removal was taken as 0 h postinfection (hpi) for all experiments. Extracted and purified viral preparations were titrated by plaque assay (18).

Plasmid construction.

The p53 vector set containing pCMV-p53 and dominant negative pCMV-p53-mt135 (DNp53; catalog no. 631922) was purchased from Clontech. NSP1 p53 and different truncated mutants of NSP1 p53 were cloned in pcDNA6B and ubiquitin, and the domains of p53 were cloned in the pFLAG-CMV vector using specific primers.

Antibodies, reagents, and inhibitor.

Rabbit polyclonal antibody against NSP1 was raised against a peptide fragment of NSP1 according to standard protocols at the Department of Virology and Parasitology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan. Antibodies against the His probe (sc-803) and Bax (sc-493) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA). Antibodies against caspase-9 (catalog no. 9501 and 9502), caspase-3 (catalog no. 9662 and 9664), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP (catalog no. 9541 and 9542), Cox4 (catalog no. 4844), GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; catalog no. 2118), PUMA (catalog no. 4976), and β-actin (catalog no. 4967) were from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibody against p53 (catalog no. 554165) was purchased from BD Biosciences. Antibody against the FLAG epitope (catalog no. SAB4200071) was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All antibodies were used at the manufacturers' recommended dilution. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (catalog no. 9901) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. MDM2 inhibitor Nutlin-3 (catalog no. N6287) was purchased from Sigma.

Mitochondrion isolation.

Mitochondria were isolated from infected MA104 cells by the differential centrifugation method. Cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), scraped, and resuspended in 1 to 2% (wt/vol) Triton X-100, 0.01 to 0.03% (wt/vol) NP-40, 0.4 to 0.6% (wt/vol) CHAPS {3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate} in ice for 30 min for cell disruption, followed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 7,000 × g for 10 min to pellet the mitochondria, and the supernatant was saved as the cytoplasm. The pellet was washed with buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES; pH 7.5) and then centrifuged at 7,000 × g for 10 min and saved as the mitochondrial fraction. For protein extraction, the pellets were resuspended in buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 120 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 2% ampholytes (pH 3 to 10), and 40 mM Tris-HCl and further incubated in ice for 30 min.

Immunoblot analysis.

Whole-cell lysates (extracted with Totex buffer [20 mM HEPES at pH 7.9, 0.35 M NaCl, 20% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 50 mM NaF, 0.3 mM Na3VO4] containing a mixture of protease and phosphatase inhibitors [Sigma, St. Louis, MO]), cytoplasmic or mitochondrial extracts, in vitro-transcribed and -translated (IVT) products, or immunoprecipitated products were prepared. Samples were incubated in protein sample buffer (final concentrations, 50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 1% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromphenol blue) for 30 min at 4°C or, alternatively, boiled for 5 min before SDS-PAGE at room temperature, followed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies with the manufacturer's recommended dilutions, as described previously (25). For anti-NSP1 antibody, a 1:3,000 dilution was used. Primary antibodies were identified with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and chemiluminescent substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Where necessary, to confirm protein loading, blots were reprobed with β-actin, GAPDH, or Cox4. The immunoblots shown are representative of three independent experiments.

Coimmunoprecipitation.

Cell lysates from infected MA104 cells or transfected 293T cells were clarified, followed by incubation with specific antibodies overnight at 4°C and with protein A-Sepharose beads for 4 h. Beads were washed 5 times with 1 ml wash buffer (200 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40), and bound proteins were eluted by boiling for 5 min with SDS sample buffer before separation on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, followed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies.

Quantitative real-time PCR.

Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was prepared from 1 to 2 μg of RNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with random hexamer primers. Real-time PCRs (50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 min) were performed in triplicate using SYBR green (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with primers specific for the p53 (forward [F] primer 5′-TACCACCATCCACTACAACTAC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CACAAACACGCACCTCAAAG-3′), gapdh (F primer 5′-AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCAG-3′ and R primer 5′-AAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTC-3′), nsp4 (F primer 5′-GTGCAAACGACAGGTGAAATAG-3′ and R primer 5′-AGTCACTTCTCTTGGTTCATAAGG-3′), bax (F primer 5′-AGTAACATGGAGCTGCAGAG-3′ and R primer 5′-AGTAGAAAAGGGCGACAACC-3′), and puma (F primer 5′-CGACCTCAACGCACAGTAC-3′ and R primer 5′-CCTAATTGGGCTCCATCTCG-3′) genes. The relative levels of gene expression were normalized to the level for the GAPDH gene using the formula 2−ΔΔCT (where ΔΔCT is the change in the threshold cycle value [ΔCT] for the sample minus ΔCT for the untreated control).

In vitro coupled transcription and translation and purification.

Full-length p53, NSP1, and mutants of p53 cloned under the T7 promoter (pCDNA) were subjected to in vitro coupled transcription/translation using a TNT quick coupled transcription/translation system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer's specifications. In the presence of Transcend biotinylated-lysyl tRNA, 2 μg plasmid was added to TNT Quick Master mix for 90 min at 30°C and the products were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using Pierce high-sensitivity streptavidin-HRP (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Recombinant proteins were purified on Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) magnetic agarose beads under native conditions. Purity was confirmed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies (data not shown).

In vitro interaction.

One of the suspected purified interacting partners was subjected to enterokinase (EK) treatment (substrate ratio, 1:42 at 37°C in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6; the reaction was stopped by adding 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and heating at 95°C for 10 min, and then the reaction mixture was passed through the Ni2+-NTA column) to remove the His tag, and the other partner (5 μg) had previously been immobilized on Ni2+ by overnight incubation in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS) at 4°C. After extensive washing in PBS–0.3% Tween to remove unbound protein, immobilized protein was incubated with enterokinase-treated protein (10 μg) for 4 h at 4°C in HBS. Beads were washed extensively with HBS to remove nonspecifically bound proteins. Remaining proteins were separated by 4× sample buffer and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for enterokinase-treated protein.

Assay for caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation.

After the different treatments, cell lysates were isolated and caspase-9 and caspase-3 cleavage activity was measured using an ApoAlert caspase fluorescent assay kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Clontech, Mountain View, CA), which uses hydrolysis of the synthetic substrates Leu-Glu-His-Asp (LEHD) conjugated to 7-amino-4-methyl coumarin (LEHD-AMC) and Asp-Glu-Val-Asp (DEVD) conjugated to 7-amino-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin (DEVD-AFC), respectively.

Statistical analysis.

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs) of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 3). In all tests, a P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Reduced p53 levels during SA11 infection are a posttranscriptional phenomenon.

The effect of rotavirus infection on the p53 level was initially analyzed in vitro. MA104 cells were infected with SA11 (MOI, 3) at increasing time points (0 to 14 hpi), followed by immunoblot analysis of the cell lysates with p53-specific antibody. Unlike mock-infected cells (Fig. 1C), a decrease in the levels of p53 during early infection (4 to 8 hpi) followed by an increase in p53 amount at later time points (10 to 14 hpi) (Fig. 1A) was observed. To overrule the effect of rotavirus (SA11)-mediated downregulation of interferon (IFN), which in turn can modulate p53 expression (26), p53 levels were also assessed in an IFN pathway-defective Vero cell line (27). Consistent with previous results in MA104 cells, depletion of the p53 level was also observed in SA11-infected Vero cells, suggesting that the reduction in p53 level is IFN independent (Fig. 1B). To assess whether rotavirus-mediated regulation of p53 is transcriptional or posttranscriptional, p53 mRNA was quantitated by real-time PCR in SA11-infected MA104 cells (0 to 14 hpi). As shown in Fig. 1D, p53 mRNA was induced during early infection (2 hpi), and the level remained almost the same until 14 hpi, suggesting that depletion of the p53 level is a posttranscriptional phenomenon. This was further confirmed by measuring downstream p53-regulated genes, such as bax and puma. Consistent with the p53 protein level (Fig. 1A), the bax and puma genes were downregulated (Fig. 1D) during early infection.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

p53 level undergoes posttranscriptional depletion during SA11 infection. (A and B) MA104 cells (A) or Vero cells (B) were infected with SA11 at an MOI of 3 for 2 to 14 hpi, followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53, anti-NSP1, and anti-GAPDH antibody. The relative fold change in protein levels of p53 during SA11 infection in both MA104 cells (A) and Vero cells (B) was normalized relative to the level of the internal control, GAPDH. Results shown here are representative of triplicate immunoblotting experiments. (C) The level of p53 remains stable in mock-infected MA104 cells. Mock-infected MA104 cells were harvested at different time points, followed by immunoblotting with p53- and GAPDH-specific antibody. (D) Relative fold change in transcript levels of nsp4, bax, p53, and puma during SA11 infection compared with the level of the uninfected control normalized with respect to that of the internal control, the GAPDH gene. MA104 cells were infected with SA11 at an MOI of 3 for the indicated time points. RNA was isolated, and the nsp4, p53, bax, and puma mRNA levels were analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Fold changes were obtained by normalizing the relative gene expression to that of the GAPDH gene using the formula 2−ΔΔCT (ΔΔCT = ΔCT for the sample minus ΔCT for the untreated control).

NSP1 induces PI3K activation-independent but proteasome-dependent p53 degradation.

Rotavirus NSP1 has been shown to degrade antiviral proteins IRF3 and RIG-I (20, 21). To assess whether the decrease in p53 level during rotavirus infection is mediated by NSP1, the levels of p53 were analyzed in MA104 cells infected with NSP1 mutant strain A5-16 (28). As shown in Fig. 2A, no p53 degradation was observed at 2 to 14 hpi following A5-16 infection, suggesting a role of NSP1 in modulation of the p53 level. For further confirmation, 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 alone or cotransfected with the pACGFP vector plus pCMV-p53 or pcDNSP1 (SA11 strain) or with pCMV-p53 plus pcDNSP1. After 36 h, cell lysates were immunoblotted to assess the levels of p53. In the absence of viral infection, p53 degradation was observed only in NSP1-overexpressing cells and not in cells coexpressing p53 with green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Fig. 2B), and no significant change in expression of GFP was observed in NSP1-expressing cells (Fig. 2B), suggesting that NSP1-mediated degradation of p53 is specific. To know whether this p53 degradation by NSP1 is proteasome mediated, 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 alone or cotransfected with pcDNSP1 in the presence or absence of proteasome inhibitor (10 μM MG132), followed by immunoblot analysis. As shown in Fig. 2C, the p53 level was restored in the presence of MG132, whereas in the absence of MG132, p53 was degraded in NSP1-expressing cells, suggesting that p53 is degraded by a proteasome-dependent mechanism (Fig. 2C).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

NSP1 induces proteasomal degradation of p53. (A) In NSP1 mutant A5-16-infected MA104 cells, p53 is not degraded. MA104 cells were infected with A5-16 at an MOI of 3 for the indicated time points, followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53 antibody and anti-GAPDH antibody. (B) NSP1 expression in the absence of other rotaviral proteins is sufficient for p53 degradation. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 alone or cotransfected with the pACGFP vector plus pCMV-p53 or pcDNSP1 or with pCMV-p53 plus pcDNSP1 for 36 h, followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53, anti-β-actin, and anti-NSP1 antibody. The relative fold change in protein levels of p53 was normalized with respect to the level of the internal control, β-actin. Results shown here are representative of triplicate immunoblotting experiments. (D) NSP1-induced p53 degradation is prevented in the presence of MG132. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 or cotransfected with either pCMV-p53 or pcDNSP1 in the presence or absence of 10 μM MG132, followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-p53, anti-β-actin, and anti-NSP1 antibody. The relative fold change in protein levels of p53 was normalized with respect to that of the internal control, β-actin. Results shown here are representative of triplicate immunoblotting experiments.

Our group previously reported the role of NSP1 in activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway (19). AKT has been shown to modulate functions of MDM2, a cellular ubiquitin ligase which can induce p53 degradation (29, 30). To understand whether NSP1-mediated AKT phosphorylation results in p53 degradation, MA104 cells were infected with SA11 or mock infected in the presence or absence of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (10 μM). As shown in Fig. 3A, LY294002 could not restore the levels of p53 in SA11-infected cells. Furthermore, in p53-overexpressing 293T cells following transfection with pcDNSP1, p53 degradation was observed in both the presence and absence of PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) (Fig. 3C). Similarly, in the presence of MDM2 inhibitor (Nutlin-3), NSP1-mediated p53 degradation was not completely inhibited (Fig. 3B and D). Overall, the results suggested that the NSP1-mediated degradation of p53 is independent of its PI3K-activating function.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

NSP1 in the presence or absence of other viral proteins induces p53 degradation independently of PI3K and MDM2. (A and B) SA11 infection stimulates p53 degradation both in the presence and in the absence of PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) and MDM2 inhibitor (Nutlin-3). MA104 cells were infected with SA11 at an MOI of 3 for the indicated time points in the presence or absence of either LY294002 (A) or Nutlin-3 (B), followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53, anti-GAPDH, and anti-NSP1 antibody. (C and D) NSP1 stimulates p53 degradation both in presence and in the absence of PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) and MDM2 inhibitor (Nutlin-3). 293T cells were either cotransfected with pCMV-p53 and pcDNSP1, transfected with pCMV-p53, or kept mock transfected for 36 h in the presence or absence of either LY294002 (C) or Nutlin-3 (D), followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53, anti-β-actin, and anti-NSP1 antibody.

NSP1 interacts with p53 and modulates its ubiquitinylation.

To delineate the mechanism behind NSP1-mediated p53 degradation, the possibility of an interaction between the two proteins was analyzed. 293T cells were either cotransfected with pcDNSP1 and pCMV-p53 or transfected individually. After 36 h, immunoprecipitation was done with either anti-p53 antibody or anti-His antibody (for NSP1), as described in Materials and Methods, followed by immunoblotting with the reciprocal antibody. As shown in Fig. 4A, NSP1 coimmunoprecipitated with p53. Input cell lysates were probed to confirm NSP1 and p53 expression. For further confirmation, an in vitro interaction assay was performed using IVT p53 and IVT NSP1, as described in Materials and Methods. Results showed that p53 interacts with NSP1 when immunoprecipitated with either immobilized NSP1 or p53 (Fig. 4B). In the absence of other viral proteins, interaction of NSP1 with p53 was confirmed, but to know whether this interaction also occurs during rotavirus infection, lysates from MA104 cells infected with SA11 (0 to 14 hpi) were immunoprecipitated with either anti-p53 antibody (Fig. 4D) or anti-NSP1 antibody (Fig. 4E), followed by immunoblotting with reciprocal antibodies. Results revealed that the p53 and NSP1 interaction was observed during early hours of infection (4 to 8 hpi) (Fig. 4D and E), which correlates with p53 degradation (Fig. 1A).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

NSP1 interacts with p53 both during infection and in cells overexpressing NSP1. (A) NSP1 interacts with p53 in the absence of other viral proteins. 293T cells were either cotransfected with pCMV-p53 and pcDNSP1 or transfected with the individual constructs for 36 h and coimmunoprecipitated (IP) with either anti-p53 or anti-His antibody, followed by immunoblot analysis using the reciprocal antibodies. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-p53 and anti-NSP1 antibody. W.B., Western blot. (B) NSP1 interacts with p53 under in vitro conditions. IVT p53 or IVT NSP1 was immobilized with Ni+2, and enterokinase-treated reciprocal IVT proteins were incubated with them, followed by immunoblot analysis for p53 and NSP1, respectively. (C) NSP1 induces ubiquitinylation of p53. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 or cotransfected with pCMV-p53 plus pFLAG-CMVUb or pCMV-p53, pcDNSP1, and pFLAG-CMV-Ub for 36 h and coimmunoprecipitated with anti-p53 antibody, followed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-p53 and anti-NSP1 antibody. (D and E) NSP1 interacts with p53 during SA11 infection. MA104 cells were infected with SA11 at an MOI of 3 for the indicated time points, and coimmunoprecipitation was done with either anti-p53 (D) or anti-NSP1 (E) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the reciprocal antibody. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-p53 and anti-NSP1 antibody.

p53 degradation by NSP1 was restored in the presence of MG132, suggesting a role of the proteasomal pathway; thus, to analyze whether NSP1 modulates ubiquitinylation of p53, 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 alone or cotransfected with pFLAG-CMV6-Ub in the presence or absence of pcDNSP1. After 36 h, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with p53-specific antibody and probed with anti-FLAG antibody. Results revealed increased ubiquitination of p53 in the presence of NSP1 (Fig. 4C). Input lysates were probed with anti-p53 and anti-NSP1 antibody.

p53 interacts with NSP1 by its DNA binding domain.

According to functionality, p53 has been divided into three domains: the N-terminal transactivation domain (amino acids 1 to 80), the central DNA binding core domain (amino acids 100 to 300), and the C-terminal multifunctional regulatory domain (amino acids 300 to 393) (31, 32). To identify the region which interacts with NSP1, all three domains of p53 were cloned individually in the pFLAG-CMV vector. The expression of the constructs was tested by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 5A). To determine the interacting domains of p53, pcDNSP1 and the truncated mutants were cotransfected, followed by coimmunoprecipitation with either anti-FLAG or anti-His antibody, and immunoblotted with the reciprocal antibody. Results showed that the DNA binding region (amino acids 100 to 300) of p53 coimmunoprecipitated with NSP1, whereas the C-terminal transactivation domain and the N-terminal regulatory domain did not interact with NSP1 (Fig. 5B and C). Input lysates were immunoblotted with anti-FLAG and anti-NSP1 antibodies. For further confirmation, NSP1 and all the p53 domains were cloned in pcDNA and expressed using an in vitro transcription-translation system to analyze the interaction between the NSP1 and p53 mutants in vitro. Consistent with previous results (Fig. 5B and C), only the DNA binding core domain (p53 [amino acids 100 to 300]) interacted with NSP1 (Fig. 5D and E).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

The DNA binding domain (amino acids 100 to 300) of p53 interacts with NSP1. (A) Analysis of expression of truncated constructs of p53. 293T cells were transfected with the region of pFLAG-CMV-p53 from amino acids 1 to 80, pFLAG-CMV-p53 from amino acids 100 to 300, or pFLAG-CMV-p53 from amino acids 300 to 393, followed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG and anti-β-actin antibody. (B and C) The region from amino acids 100 to 300 interacts with NSP1. 293T cells were either cotransfected with pcDNSP1 and each of the p53 domains or transfected with the individual constructs for 36 h and coimmunoprecipitated with either anti-FLAG (B) or anti-His (C) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with reciprocal antibody. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-NSP1 and anti-FLAG antibody. (D and E) The DNA binding domain of p53 interacts with NSP1 in vitro. Different IVT products of p53 mutants or IVT NSP1 were immobilized with Ni+2, and enterokinase-treated reciprocal IVT proteins were incubated with them, followed by immunoblot analysis of the proteins interacting with the immobilized proteins.

The RING domain of NSP1 is required for p53 degradation but not for interaction.

The N-terminal ring domain of NSP1 is presumed to contain ubiquitin ligase activity (21). To know whether this region is necessary for p53 binding and degradation, only the RING domain (amino acids 1 to 82; RING-NSP1) and NSP1 with the RING domain deleted (amino acids 83 to 482; ΔRING-NSP1) were cloned in pcDNA and checked for their expression (Fig. 6A and B). To identify the binding region, 293T cells were either cotransfected with pCMV-p53 and pcDRING-NSP1 or pcDΔRING-NSP1 or transfected individually, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-His or anti-p53 antibody. RING-NSP1 did not immunoprecipitate with p53, but ΔRING-NSP1 showed a specific interaction with p53, irrespective of whether it was pulled down using anti-His or anti-p53 antibody (Fig. 6C and D). To confirm the role of NSP1's RING domain in p53 degradation, p53 was overexpressed either alone or with full-length NSP1 or ΔRING-NSP1 in 293T cells for 36 h, followed by immunoblotting with p53-specific antibody, as described above. No degradation of p53 was observed in cells transfected with ΔRING-NSP1 compared to cells transfected with wild-type NSP1 (Fig. 6E), confirming the requirement of the RING domain of NSP1 in degradation of p53. To determine whether this RING domain is also necessary for ubiquitination of NSP1, 293T cells were either cotransfected with pCMV-p53, pcDNSP1, and pFLAG-CMV-Ub or pCMV-p53, pcDΔRING NSP1, and pFLAG-CMV-Ub or transfected with pCMV-p53 only. After 36 h, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-p53 antibody, followed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody. As shown in Fig. 6F, no ubiquitination was observed in cells expressing ΔRING-NSP1. Overall, the results suggest that the RING domain is responsible for the ubiquitination of p53 but the C-terminal region of NSP1 is necessary for interaction with p53.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

The RING domain of NSP1 is necessary for ubiquitinylation and degradation, but it does not bind to p53. (A) Schematic representation of NSP1, the RING domain (amino acids 1 to 82) of NSP1, and RING domain mutant NSP1 (amino acids 83 to 482) cloned in pcDNA. (B) Ectopic expression of fragments of NSP1. 293T cells were transfected with pcDRING-NSP1 and pcDΔRING-NSP1 for 36 h, followed by immunoblotting with anti-His and anti-β-actin antibody. (C and D) The RING domain is not necessary for interaction with p53. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53, pcDRING-NSP1, or pcDΔRING-NSP1 individually or cotransfected with either pCMV-p53 and pcDRING-NSP1 or pCMV-p53 and pcDΔRING-NSP1 separately for 36 h and coimmunoprecipitated with either anti-His (C) or anti-p53 (D) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the reciprocal antibody. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-p53 anti-His antibody. (E) The RING domain is necessary for degradation of p53. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 or cotransfected with either pCMV-p53 and pcDNSP1 or pCMV-p53 and pcDΔRING-NSP1 separately for 36 h, followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53 and anti-β-actin antibody. (F) The RING domain is necessary for ubiquitinylation of p53. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 or cotransfected with pCMV-p53, pcDΔRING-NSP1, and pFLAG-CMV-Ub or pCMV-p53, pcDNSP1, and pFLAG-CMV-Ub for 36 h, followed by coimmunoprecipitation with anti-p53 antibody and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody.

NSP1-mediated degradation of p53 delays p53-mediated apoptosis induction during SA11 infection.

Induction of apoptosis is a physiological function of p53, which is controlled by its two downstream proteins, PUMA and Bax (33). To know the effect of p53 degradation on PUMA expression and Bax activation during infection, mitochondrial fractions or whole-cell lysates from MA104 cells infected with SA11 (0 to 14 h) were analyzed by immunoblotting. Consistent with the decreased p53 levels during early infection, depletion of PUMA was also observed until 8 hpi and Bax translocation to mitochondria was observed only after 10 hpi (Fig. 7A). Similar results were observed in cells infected with another rotavirus strain, A5-13 (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). However, in A5-16 (NSP1 mutant)-infected cells, early PUMA upregulation (2 hpi) and translocation of Bax to mitochondria (4 hpi) were observed (Fig. 7B). To confirm whether modulation of PUMA and Bax during rotavirus infection is PI3K dependent or not, MA104 cells were infected with either SA11 (0 to 14 h) or A5-16 (0 to 14 h) in the presence of LY294002, and cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. Results revealed that modulation of PUMA expression and Bax translocation during infection with SA11 or A5-16 were similar in the presence or absence of LY294002, suggesting that these are independent of PI3K activation (Fig. 7C and D). Rotavirus NSP4 protein has been shown to induce apoptosis (34); thus, to overrule the effect of NSP4 in modulating p53-induced apoptosis, 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53 or cotransfected with pcDNSP1 and pCMV-p53 or pCMV-p53-mt135 (DNp53) and pCMV-p53 for 36 h, followed by immunoblot analysis of whole-cell lysates or the mitochondrial fraction. As shown in Fig. 7E, reduced apoptosis was observed in the presence of either NSP1 or DNp53, as assessed by reduced caspase-9 and PARP cleavage and expression of PUMA or translocation of Bax to the mitochondria. Infection with the SA11 (0 to 14 hpi) strain resulted in downregulation of PUMA expression and delayed translocation of Bax to mitochondria in DNp53-expressing cells (Fig. 8A) compared to the results for pACGFP-transfected cells, which showed increased expression of PUMA and Bax translocation at later time points (>10 hpi) (Fig. 8B), similar to SA11-infected cells (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, cleavage of synthetic substrates for caspase-9 (LEHD-AMC) and caspase-3 (DEVD-AFC) was significantly lower (20 to 30%) in SA11-infected cells expressing dominant negative p53 than pACGFP-expressing or mock-transfected cells (Fig. 8C and D), confirming the role of p53 in induction of apoptosis during later time points of rotavirus infection.

Fig 7.

Fig 7

NSP1-mediated p53 degradation prevents p53-activated apoptosis initiation in SA11 infection during early infection independently of PI3K. (A and B) The levels of PUMA and activation of Bax remain downregulated at initial time points of SA11 infection but not during NSP1 mutant A5-16 infection. MA104 cells were infected with either SA11 (A) at an MOI of 3 or A5-16 (B) at an MOI of 3 or kept mock infected for the indicated time points, followed by immunoblot analysis of either the whole-cell lysates with anti-PUMA and anti-β-actin antibody or the mitochondrial fraction with anti-Bax and anti-Cox4 antibody. (C and D) p53-induced modulation of apoptosis during SA11 (NSP1 positive) or A5-16 (NSP1 negative) infection is independent of NSP1-mediated PI3K activation. MA104 cells were infected with either SA11 (C) or A5-16 (D) at an MOI of 3 in the presence of LY294002 for the indicated time points, followed by immune blot analysis of either the whole-cell lysates with anti-PUMA and anti-β-actin antibody or the mitochondrial fraction with anti-Bax and anti-Cox4 antibody. (E) NSP1 counteracts the proapoptotic function of p53. 293T cells were either transfected with pCMV-p53, cotransfected with either pcDNSP1 and pCMV-p53 or pCMV-p53-mt135 and pcDNSP1, or kept mock transfected for 36 h, followed by immunoblot analysis of the whole-cell lysate (PUMA, caspase-9, caspase-3, PARP, and β-actin antibodies) and the mitochondrial fraction (anti-Bax, and anti-Cox4 antibodies).

Fig 8.

Fig 8

Apoptosis induced during later stages of rotavirus infection (SA11) is partly dependent on p53 expression. (A and B) Inhibition of p53 function during SA11 infection inhibits upregulation of the PUMA level and Bax activation. MA104 cells were transfected with pCMV-p53-mt135 (A) or a nonspecific vector, pACGFP (B), for 24 h and then infected with SA11 for the indicated time points, followed by immunoblot analysis of whole-cell lysates (anti-PUMA, anti-β-actin) and the mitochondrial fraction (anti-Bax, anti-Cox4). (C and D) In the absence of functional p53, rotavirus-induced caspase activation was decreased. MA104 cells were either infected with SA11 in the presence or absence of caspase-9 inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Glu-His-Asp-methyl-fluoromethylketone (Z-LEHD-FMK) (C) or caspase-3 inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-fluoromethylketone (Z-DEVD-FMK) (D) or transfected with pCMV-p53-mt135 or a nonspecific vector, pACGFP, for 24 h and then infected with SA11 for the indicated time points, followed by caspase activity assay using synthetic substrates for caspase-9 (LEHD-AMC) and caspase-3 (DEVD-AFC). Results are representative of three independent experiments. Values represent the means ± SDs of one experiment with three measurements taken.

DISCUSSION

The innate immune response against virus infection is the first line of defense in vertebrates, and viruses have also developed strategies to evade the early immune response for efficient infection (35, 36). p53 has a potential role in antiviral innate immunity, as it induces the apoptotic machinery as well as transactivates several genes which are directly involved in viral sensing, cytokine production, and inflammation (7). Similarly viruses have been shown to counteract p53, as reported in hepatitis B virus (37), Epstein-Barr virus (38), human papillomavirus (39), etc. In this study, we have shown the mechanism by which rotavirus modulates the p53 level during different stages of infection for its own advantage.

During the early stages of rotavirus infection, when replication is the principal focus of the virus, p53 downregulation was observed irrespective of the strain type (Fig. 1A; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Recent studies have shown that transcription of the p53 gene depends on the interferon response (26) and during infection interferon induction is downregulated by rotaviruses (20). However, during rotavirus infection, p53 regulation seems to be an interferon-independent phenomenon, since p53 was also downregulated in rotavirus-infected Vero cells, which lack a functional interferon pathway (Fig. 1C).

NSP1's role in p53 downregulation was predicted when no p53 degradation was observed in A5-16 (NSP1 mutant)-infected cells (Fig. 2A). Moreover, in the absence of viral infection, p53 was also degraded in NSP1-overexpressing cells (Fig. 2B). No significant change in p53 transcript levels (Fig. 1D) and restoration of the p53 levels in the presence of MG132 suggested posttranslational proteasomal degradation of p53 during rotavirus infection (Fig. 2C). In addition to modulation of the interferon response (20), NSP1 has also been shown to activate the PI3K/AKT pathway (19). AKT has been shown to regulate the phosphorylation of MDM2, which, when activated, induces p53 degradation (29). Results revealed that the p53-modulating activity of NSP1 was independent of its PI3K/AKT activation ability, since in the presence of both PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) and MDM2 inhibitor (Nutlin-3), SA11-induced p53 degradation was observed (Fig. 3A to D). No effect of LY294002 on viral gene (NSP1) expression was observed (Fig. 3A), suggesting that it does not directly affect viral replication. In our previous study (19), the lower viral titers observed in the presence of LY294002 could be due to premature apoptosis initiation, resulting in reduced numbers of infectious viral particles.

The versatility of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in controlling cellular homeostasis through posttranslational protein modification makes it an attractive target for viruses. Viruses manipulate this system by diverse mechanisms. Baculoviruses encode their own ubiquitin (40), and modified cellular ubiquitin has also been found in poxviruses and herpes simplex viruses (41). Some viruses encode their own E3 ligase (42), and others recruit cellular E3 ligase for directing the ubiquitin system to their choice of substrate (43). E3 ligase carries out the final step of substrate binding and ubiquitinylation of it (44). Like most of the virus-encoded E3 ligases, NSP1 has a RING domain in the N terminus (amino acids 1 to 82) (21). Among the three types of ubiquitin ligases, the RING family is the largest one (45). Members of this family of ubiquitin ligases facilitate ubiquitinylation by binding charged ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2) and substrate proteins simultaneously without being covalently attached to ubiquitin. NSP1 was found to coimmunoprecipitate with p53 in both cell lysates (Fig. 4A) and under in vitro conditions (Fig. 4B), and the amount of ubiquitinylation of p53 is increased in the presence of NSP1 (Fig. 4C), confirming the specific interaction of NSP1 with p53. Interaction of NSP1-p53 during early stages of infection (Fig. 4D and E) correlated with p53 degradation during early infection (Fig. 1A). A coimmunoprecipitation experiment with different p53 and NSP1 mutants identified interaction between the DNA binding core domain (amino acids 100 to 300) of p53 and the C-terminal domain of NSP1 (ΔRING NSP1, amino acids 83 to 482) (Fig. 5B to E and 6C and D). The RING domain of E3 ligases interacts not only with E2 but also sometimes with the substrate; however, in the case of NSP1, the RING domain was found to be essential for p53 degradation and ubiquitinylation (Fig. 6E and F) but did not interact with p53 (Fig. 6C and D), suggesting that full-length NSP1 is required for modulating p53 function.

p53 integrates multiple stress signals into a series of diverse antiproliferative responses; among them, the ability to activate apoptosis by transcription-dependent and -independent pathways is the most important (46). p53 transactivates several apoptotic genes (bax, puma, bid) (47) and activates the translocation of Bax to mitochondria (48). PUMA plays a vital role in Bax activation and initiation of apoptosis (49). Consistent with previous results, bax and puma transcripts were downregulated at the initial time points of SA11 infection, but expression was restored during the late infection (Fig. 1D). Similarly, increased levels of PUMA protein or translocation of Bax to mitochondria occurred during late hours (10 hpi) of SA11 or A5-13 infection (Fig. 7A; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), unlike in NSP1 mutant strain (A5-16)-infected cells, where Bax activation and PUMA upregulation occurred during early infection (2 to 4 hpi) (Fig. 7B). A5-16 was previously reported to poorly activate the PI3K pathway, contributing to induction of early apoptosis (19). Failure to modulate PUMA and Bax could also contribute further in early apoptosis and to the lower growth rate of A5-16 (28). However, in the presence of PI3K inhibitor, no significant effect on PUMA expression or Bax translocation was observed in either SA11- or A5-16-infected cells, suggesting no role of NSP1-mediated PI3K activation in p53-induced apoptosis during rotavirus infection (Fig. 7C and D). Inactivation of p53 by dominant negative p53 resulted in inhibition of rotavirus-induced PUMA upregulation or Bax translocation to mitochondria (Fig. 8A). This, in turn, also resulted in reduced apoptosis induction in DNp53-expressing cells either transfected with pCMV-p53 or infected with SA11 compared to that in pCMV-p53-transfected or SA11-infected cells (Fig. 7E and 8C and D). In the presence of NSP1 with or without PI3K/AKT inhibitor, the level of p53-stimulated apoptosis was significantly reduced compared to that in cells only overexpressing p53 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), suggesting the significance of NSP1 in modulation of p53-induced apoptosis during rotavirus infection. Since inhibition of apoptosis during early stages of infection is beneficial for the virus to complete its life cycle, activation of the PI3K pathway and degradation of p53 by NSP1 can be a viral strategy for inhibiting apoptosis. In our previous study, we demonstrated that NSP4 plays a crucial role in SA11-induced apoptosis, as it targets mitochondria and destabilizes it, but in the presence of NSP4 small interfering RNA, apoptosis was still observed during late infection (34), which might have been due to increased p53 levels, which in turn activate Bax, during late infection (50). Thus, control of apoptosis through a biphasic pattern of the p53 level is a highly efficient strategy for successful infection by rotavirus. Overall, the results show that NSP1 targets diverse cellular proteins to modulate host innate immune responses according to the requirement of rotavirus during different steps of infection.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India, and the Program for Funding Research Centers for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases (Okayama University-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, India) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan. R.B. was supported by junior research fellowships from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India. U.C.H. and S.C. were supported by senior research fellowships from CSIR, India. M.K.N. was supported by Dr. D. S. Kothari postdoctoral fellowships from the University Grants Commission (UGC), India.

The antibody to NSP1 was kindly donated by Koki Taniguchi.

George Banik is acknowledged for his technical support.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 10 April 2013

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00734-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lane DP, Crawford LV. 1979. T antigen is bound to a host protein in SV40-transformed cells. Nature 278:261–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Linzer DI, Levine AJ. 1979. Characterization of a 54K dalton cellular SV40 tumor antigen present in SV40-transformed cells and uninfected embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell 17:43–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ryan KM. 2010. Cancer: viruses backup plan. Nature 466:1054–1055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vousden KH, Lane DP. 2007. p53 in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:275–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. 2000. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 408:307–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lin R, Noyce RS, Collins SE, Everett RD, Mossman KL. 2004. The herpes simplex virus ICP0 RING finger domain inhibits IRF3- and IRF7-mediated activation of interferon-stimulated genes. J. Virol. 78:1675–1684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rivas C, Aaronson SA, Munoz-Fontela C. 2010. Dual role of p53 in innate antiviral immunity. Viruses 2:298–313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Toribio R, Ventoso I. 2010. Inhibition of host translation by virus infection in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:9837–9842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hiscott J, Kwon H, Génin P. 2001. Hostile takeovers: viral appropriation of the NF-kappaB pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 107:143–151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sato Y, Kamura T, Shirata N, Murata T, Kudoh A, Iwahori S, Nakayama S, Isomura H, Nishiyama Y, Tsurumi T. 2009. Degradation of phosphorylated p53 by viral protein-ECS E3 ligase complex. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000530 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Querido E, Blanchette P, Yan Q, Kamura T, Morrison M, Boivin D, Kaelin WG, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Branton PE. 2001. Degradation of p53 by adenovirus E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins occurs via a novel mechanism involving a Cullin-containing complex. Genes Dev. 15:3104–3117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bernard X, Robinson P, Nominé Y, Masson M, Charbonnier S, Ramirez-Ramos JR, Deryckere F, Travé G, Orfanoudakis G. 2011. Proteasomal degradation of p53 by human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein relies on the structural integrity of p53 core domain. PLoS One 6:e25981 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pise-Masison CA, Choi KS, Radonovich M, Dittmer J, Kim SJ, Brady JN. 1998. Inhibition of p53 transactivation function by the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax protein. J. Virol. 72:1165–1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wang XW, Forrester K, Yeh H, Feitelson MA, Gu JR, Harris CC. 1994. Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits p53 sequence-specific DNA binding, transcriptional activity, and association with transcription factor ERCC3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:2230–2234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang X, Deng X, Yan W, Zhu Z, Shen Y, Qiu Y, Shi Z, Shao D, Wei J, Xia X, Ma Z. 2012. Stabilization of p53 in influenza A virus-infected cells is associated with compromised MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of p53. J. Biol. Chem. 287:18366–18375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Boutell C, Everett RD. 2004. Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection induces the stabilization of p53 in a USP7- and ATM-independent manner. J. Virol. 78:8068–8077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tiemann F, Deppert W. 1994. Stabilization of the tumor suppressor p53 during cellular transformation by simian virus 40: influence of viral and cellular factors and biological consequences. J. Virol. 68:869–878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Estes MK, Kapikian AZ. 2007. Rotavirus, p 1917–1974 In Knipe DM, Howley PN, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus EE. (ed), Fields virology, 5th ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bagchi P, Dutta D, Chattopadhyay S, Mukherjee A, Halder UC, Sarkar S, Kobayashi N, Komoto S, Taniguchi K, Chawla-Sarkar M. 2010. Rotavirus nonstructural protein 1 suppresses virus-induced cellular apoptosis to facilitate viral growth by activating the cell survival pathways during early stages of infection. J. Virol. 84:6834–6845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Barro M, Patton JT. 2007. Rotavirus NSP1 inhibits expression of type I interferon by antagonizing the function of interferon regulatory factors IRF3, IRF5, and IRF7. J. Virol. 81:4473–4481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Qin L, Ren L, Zhou Z, Lei X, Chen L, Xue Q, Liu X, Wang J, Hung T. 2011. Rotavirus nonstructural protein 1 antagonizes innate immune response by interacting with retinoic acid inducible gene I. Virol. J. 8:526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Graff JW, Ewen J, Ettayebi K, Hardy ME. 2007. Zinc-binding domain of rotavirus NSP1 is required for proteasome-dependent degradation of IRF3 and auto regulatory NSP1 stability. J. Gen. Virol. 88:613–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bagchi P, Nandi S, Nayak MK, Chawla-Sarkar M. 2013. Molecular mechanism behind rotavirus NSP1-mediated PI3 kinase activation: interaction between NSP1 and the p85 subunit of PI3K. J. Virol. 87:2358–2362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jesenberger V, Jentsch S. 2002. Deadly encounter: ubiquitin meets apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:112–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chawla-Sarkar M, Bae SI, Reu FJ, Jacobs BS, Lindner DJ, Borden EC. 2004. Downregulation of Bcl-2, FLIP or IAPs (XIAP and survivin) by siRNAs sensitizes resistant melanoma cells to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 11:915–923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Takaoka A, Hayakawa S, Yanai H, Stoiber D, Negishi H, Kikuchi H, Sasaki S, Imai K, Shibue T, Honda K, Taniguchi T. 2003. Integration of interferon-alpha/beta signalling to p53 responses in tumour suppression and antiviral defence. Nature 424:516–523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Emeny JM, Morgan MJ. 1979. Regulation of the interferon system: evidence that Vero cells have a genetic defect in interferon production. J. Gen. Virol. 43:247–252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Taniguchi K, Kojima K, Urasawa S. 1996. Nondefective rotavirus mutants with an NSP1 gene which has a deletion of 500 nucleotides, including a cysteine-rich zinc finger motif-encoding region (nucleotides 156 to 248), or which has a nonsense codon at nucleotides 153-155. J. Virol. 70:4125–4130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gottlieb TM, Leal JF, Seger R, Taya Y, Oren M. 2002. Cross-talk between Akt, p53 and Mdm2: possible implications for the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene 21:1299–1303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bond GL, Hu W, Levine AJ. 2005. MDM2 is a central node in the p53 pathway: 12 years and counting. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 5:3–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Adler V, Pincus MR, Minamoto T, Fuchs SY, Bluth MJ, Brandt-Rauf PW, Friedman FK, Robinson RC, Chen JM, Wang XW, Harris CC, Ronai Z. 1997. Conformation-dependent phosphorylation of p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1686–1691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hupp TR, Meek DW, Midgley CA, Lane DP. 1993. Activation of the cryptic DNA binding function of mutant forms of p53. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3167–3174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vousden KH. 2005. Apoptosis. p53 and PUMA: a deadly duo. Science 309:1685–1686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bhowmick R, Halder UC, Chattopadhyay S, Chanda S, Nandi S, Bagchi P, Nayak MK, Chakrabarti O, Kobayashi N, Chawla-Sarkar M. 2012. Rotaviral enterotoxin nonstructural protein 4 targets mitochondria for activation of apoptosis during infection. J. Biol. Chem. 287:35004–35020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 35. Koyama S, Ishii KJ, Coban C, Akira S. 2008. Innate immune response to viral infection. Cytokine 43:336–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Takeuchi O, Akira S. 2009. Innate immunity to virus infection. Immunol. Rev. 227:75–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wei Wang X. 2000. Abrogation of p53-induced apoptosis by the hepatitis B virus X gene. Methods Mol. Med. 45:57–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sato Y, Shirata N, Kudoh A, Iwahori S, Nakayama S, Murata T, Isomura H, Nishiyama Y, Tsurumi T. 2009. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 immediate-early protein induces p53 degradation independent of MDM2, leading to repression of p53-mediated transcription. Virology 388:204–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Boyer SN, Wazer DE, Band V. 1996. E7 protein of human papilloma virus-16 induces degradation of retinoblastoma protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cancer Res. 56:4620–4624 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Reilly LM, Guarino LA. 1996. The viral ubiquitin gene of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus is not essential for viral replication. Virology 218:243–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Webb JH, Mayer RJ, Dixon LK. 1999. A lipid modified ubiquitin is packaged into particles of several enveloped viruses. FEBS Lett. 444:136–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yu Y, Wang SE, Hayward GS. 2005. The KSHV immediate-early transcription factor RTA encodes ubiquitin E3 ligase activity that targets IRF7 for proteosome-mediated degradation. Immunity 22:59–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ, Howley PM. 1990. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 63:1129–1136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ardley HC, Robinson PA. 2005. E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem. 41:15–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. 2009. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:399–434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Fridman JS, Lowe SW. 2003. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22:9030–9040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Vousden KH, Lu X. 2002. Live or let die: the cell's response to p53. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2:594–604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chipuk JE, Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, Droin NM, Newmeyer DD, Schuler M, Green DR. 2004. Direct activation of Bax by p53 mediates mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Science 303:1010–1014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhang Y, Xing D, Liu L. 2009. PUMA promotes Bax translocation by both directly interacting with Bax and by competitive binding to Bcl-X L during UV-induced apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:3077–3087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Martin-Latil S, Mousson L, Autret A, Colbère-Garapin F, Blondel B. 2007. Bax is activated during rotavirus-induced apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. J. Virol. 81:4457–4464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES