Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2013 Jan 18;8(3):e23454. doi: 10.4161/psb.23454

Genetic variability of oxalate oxidase activity and elongation in water-stressed primary roots of diverse maize and rice lines

Priyamvada Voothuluru 1,, Hallie J Thompson 1,, Sherry A Flint-Garcia 1,2, Robert E Sharp 1,*
PMCID: PMC3676514  PMID: 23333961

Abstract

A previous study of maize primary roots under water stress showed pronounced increases in oxalate oxidase activity and apoplastic hydrogen peroxide in the apical region of the growth zone where cell elongation is maintained. We examined whether increased oxalate oxidase activity in water-stressed roots is conserved across diverse lines of maize and rice. The maize lines exhibited varied patterns of activity, with some lines lacking activity in the apical region. Moreover, none of the rice lines showed activity in the apical region. Also, although the genotypic response of root elongation to water stress was variable in both maize and rice, this was not correlated with the pattern of oxalate oxidase activity. Implications of these findings for root growth regulation under water stress are discussed.

Keywords: maize, oxalate oxidase, rice, root elongation, water stress


Under water-limited conditions, root growth is often maintained relative to shoot growth.1-3 This response is an adaptive feature that allows plants to continue to access water as the soil dries.4,5 The mechanisms underlying growth maintenance under water stress have been studied extensively in the primary root of maize seedlings (for review see refs. 68). The length of the root growth zone is approximately 12 mm under well-watered conditions, whereas under water stress, cell elongation is maintained in the apical few mm but is inhibited progressively further from the apex, resulting in a shortened growth zone.9 These responses to water stress involve spatially differential regulation of cellular growth processes, including enhancement and inhibition of cell wall extensibility in the apical and basal regions, respectively.10 Transcriptomic and cell wall proteomic analyses conducted with the different regions of the growth zone revealed primarily region-specific changes in water-stressed compared with well-watered roots.11,12 In particular, several transcripts and proteins related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, including putative oxalate oxidases, increased in abundance in the apical region and oxalate oxidase activity was shown to increase markedly in the apical few mm.13 Oxalate oxidase activity also increased, although to a lesser extent, beyond approximately 8 mm from the apex (beyond the growth zone). Oxalate oxidases catalyze the conversion of oxalate to CO2 and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and in cereals are known to be cell wall localized.14 Recent results of Voothuluru and Sharp13 demonstrated that apoplastic H2O2 levels increased specifically in the apical region of the growth zone in water-stressed maize primary roots, correlating with the maintenance of cell elongation and the pronounced increase in oxalate oxidase activity in this region. Apoplastic ROS can have growth regulatory functions including cell wall loosening as well as tightening,15,16 and have also been shown to act as signaling molecules in various processes.17 Accordingly, the increase in apoplastic ROS in the apical region of the growth zone is likely to play an important role in root growth regulation under water stress.

The spatial profiles of transcripts, cell wall proteins, oxalate oxidase activity and apoplastic H2O2 in the growth zone of water-stressed maize primary roots, as described above, were conducted in inbred line FR697, which is a temperate line and was selected because it exhibits a relatively high capacity to maintain primary root elongation at low water potentials.18 Since maize is genetically diverse,19 we wanted to determine if the increase in oxalate oxidase activity in the apical region of the growth zone of water-stressed primary roots was conserved across diverse lines. Twenty six inbred lines, constituting the parents of the maize nested association mapping (NAM) population and representing the diversity of maize,20 were selected for analysis. The NAM parents include 10 temperate lines, three lines of mixed temperate and tropical ancestry, and 13 tropical lines (Fig. 1).

graphic file with name psb-8-e23454-g1.jpg

Figure 1. Oxalate oxidase activity determined by oxalate-dependent oxidation of 4-chloro-1-naphthol, seen as dark blue staining, in 12-mm apical segments of water-stressed primary roots of the maize NAM parental lines. Roots were harvested 48 h after transplanting to vermiculite at a water potential of -1.6 MPa. Growth conditions, water potential measurements and oxalate oxidase staining procedures were as described by Voothuluru and Sharp.13 The illustrated roots are representative of 8–15 assayed roots per line. Experiments were repeated with a subset of 10 lines to confirm consistency of staining patterns.

After germination, the seedlings were transplanted into vermiculite at water potentials of -0.03 MPa (well-watered treatment) or -1.6 MPa (severe water stress treatment) and grown under conditions of minimal evaporation or transpiration (darkness and near-saturation humidity). This system allows for precise, steady and reproducible control of water deficit conditions.9 In the well-watered treatment, none of the lines showed discernible staining for oxalate oxidase activity at any location within the apical 12 mm of the root (data not shown). In contrast, when grown under water-stressed conditions, the lines showed diverse spatial patterns of increased oxalate oxidase activity (Fig. 1). Except for lines M162W, B73 and P39, all the temperate lines exhibited oxalate oxidase activity within the apical 3 mm region (as previously observed for FR69713), with some lines showing more pronounced staining than other lines. In addition, all the temperate lines showed oxalate oxidase activity in the basal region (beyond 6 mm from the apex). The three mixed ancestry lines also showed increased oxalate oxidase activity in both the apical and basal regions. In contrast, the tropical lines showed several diverse patterns of oxalate oxidase activity: CML247, CML277, CML322, CML333, NC350 and NC358 showed staining in both the apical few mm as well as the basal region, Tzi8 showed staining only in the apical region, CML 228 showed staining only in the basal region, whereas CML52, CML69,CML103,Ki11 and Ki3 showed no oxalate oxidase activity throughout the apical 12 mm. It is not unexpected that the tropical lines show a broader range of responses as they have wider variability within their pedigrees and contain higher levels of diversity than temperate maize.21

To confirm that the varied oxalate oxidase staining observed in the apical region of the root growth zone among the lines did not result from differential penetration of the staining solution, the apical 1.5–3 mm region of a subset of 10 lines was stained after sectioning to allow direct access of the solution to the tissues. The results were consistent with those observed in the intact roots (data not shown).

The NAM parents also showed large variation in the response of primary root elongation to water stress, ranging from 24% (in NC358) to 47% (in P39) of the elongation observed in the respective well-watered controls (Fig. 2). To evaluate whether the response of root elongation was associated with the occurrence of oxalate oxidase activity in either the apical 3 mm or the basal region of the growth zone, the oxalate oxidase activity in the different regions was scored as described in Table S1. The results showed that the relative maintenance of root elongation under water stress did not correlate with the occurrence of oxalate oxidase staining in either the apical or basal regions (R2 values were ≤ 0.1).

graphic file with name psb-8-e23454-g2.jpg

Figure 2. Relative maintenance of primary root elongation in the maize NAM parental lines during 48 h after transplanting to vermiculite at a water potential of -1.6 MPa. The results are calculated as a percentage of well-watered controls; the well-watered and water-stressed root elongation data are presented in Figure S1. Values are means ± SE of n = 13–25. Analysis of variance (PROC GLM, SAS version 9.3; SAS Institute) was used to compare the means among lines in each treatment. Least significant differences (LSD) for P values of 0.05 and 0.01 are shown. Experiments were repeated with a subset of 10 lines to confirm consistency of the root growth response.

The involvement of oxalate oxidases in biotic stress tolerance is common to different cereal species.22 Therefore, to investigate whether increased oxalate oxidase activity in the root growth zone under water stress is a conserved response in cereals, we examined a range of diverse rice lines. Rice was chosen because of known variation in response to water stress and because of the availability, for future studies, of RNAi lines for all of the oxalate oxidases present in rice (J Leach, personal communication). Ten lines representing the diversity of rice (five japonica, four indica and one aus line) and known to have contrasting water use efficiency parameters23,24 were selected for analysis. However, none of the lines showed any staining for oxalate oxidase activity in the apical few mm of the root under water-stressed conditions (Fig. 3). Interestingly, while the japonica lines also exhibited no or marginal staining beyond 6 mm from the apex, the indica and aus lines consistently exhibited limited staining in this region. It should be noted, however, that we have not characterized the dimensions of the growth zone in the rice primary root under either well-watered or water-stressed conditions, and it is possible that the staining in the basal region was beyond the zone of cell elongation. The rice lines exhibited greater variation in the response of primary root elongation to water stress than that observed in maize (Fig. 4). The least inhibited rice line was Cypress, which maintained 56% of the elongation of the well-watered control, whereas the poorest line (Moroberekan) showed only 22% maintenance of root elongation. There was no correlation between the occurrence of staining for oxalate activity in the basal region and the response of root elongation to water stress (R2 = 0.005; staining scores are shown in Table S1).

graphic file with name psb-8-e23454-g3.jpg

Figure 3. Oxalate oxidase activity determined by oxalate-dependent oxidation of 4-chloro-1-naphthol in 12-mm apical segments of water-stressed primary roots (n = 8–15) of diverse rice lines. Roots were harvested 48 h after transplanting to vermiculite at a water potential of -1.2 MPa. Note that rice has a relatively thin primary root, resulting in less hydraulic contact with the vermiculite growth media compared with maize. Therefore, the rice seedlings were grown at a higher water potential than was used for maize. Other growth conditions and measurement procedures were as described in Figure 1.

graphic file with name psb-8-e23454-g4.jpg

Figure 4. Relative maintenance of primary root elongation in diverse rice lines during 48 h after transplanting to vermiculite at a water potential of -1.2 MPa. The results are calculated as a percentage of well-watered controls; the well-watered and water-stressed root elongation data are presented in Figure S2. Values are means ± SE of n = 13–18. Statistical analysis was conducted as described in Figure 2; least significant differences (LSD) for P values of 0.05 and 0.01 are shown.

Taken together, the maize and rice results suggest that oxalate oxidase-mediated mechanisms are involved in regulating the growth response in the apical region of water-stressed primary roots only in some maize lines and are not involved in any of the rice lines tested. Although a correlation between the occurrence of increased oxalate oxidase activity and root growth maintenance under water deficit conditions was not apparent, it should be emphasized that the results do not necessarily imply that the maize and rice lines that lack an oxalate oxidase response also lack the response of increased apoplastic ROS levels in the apical region of the growth zone.13 Oxalate oxidase might not be a major contributor to apoplastic H2O2 production in these lines, and increased ROS levels could be achieved by increased activity of other ROS-producing enzymes. These alternative hypotheses could be tested by measuring apoplastic ROS levels in the rice and contrasting maize lines under water stress conditions. The relevance of increased oxalate oxidase activity to the response of root elongation under water stress can be examined by manipulating oxalate oxidase activity and documenting the effects on processes regulating root elongation. In a following paper, transgenic maize lines overexpressing oxalate oxidase25 will be utilized for this purpose. The finding that maize has considerable genetic diversity in the response of oxalate oxidase activity, as well as elongation, in water-stressed roots could be useful not only in physiological studies but also in breeding programs to improve root growth traits under water deficit conditions.

Supplementary Material

Additional material
psb-8-e23454-s01.pdf (207.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jan Leach (Colorado State University) for supplying seed of the diverse rice lines. The study was supported by the Division of Plant Sciences, the Interdisciplinary Plant Group and an Undergraduate Research Internship to H.J.T from the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material may be found at: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/23454

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Sharp RE, Davies WJ. Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plants. Planta. 1979;146:319–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00384589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Westgate ME, Boyer JS. Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water potentials in maize. Planta. 1985;164:540–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00395973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ober ES, Sharp RE. Regulation of root growth responses to water deficit. In: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM, eds. Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. New York: Springer, 2007:33-53. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharp RE, Davies WJ. Root growth and water uptake by maize plants in drying soil. J Exp Bot. 1985;36:1441–56. doi: 10.1093/jxb/36.9.1441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sponchiado BN, White JW, Castillo JA, Jones PG. Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types. Exp Agric. 1989;25:249–57. doi: 10.1017/S0014479700016756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, et al. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:2343–51. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yamaguchi M, Sharp RE. Complexity and coordination of root growth at low water potentials: recent advances from transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:590–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ober ES, Sharp RE. Maintaining root growth in drying soil: a review of progress and gaps in understanding. In: Beekman T, Eshel A, eds. Plant Roots: The Hidden Half, 4th Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2013 (in press) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharp RE, Silk WK, Hsiao TC. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol. 1988;87:50–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu Y, Sharp RE, Durachko DM, Cosgrove DJ. Growth maintenance of the maize primary root at low water potentials involves increases in cell-wall extension properties, expansin activity, and wall susceptibility to expansins. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:765–72. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.3.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu J, Alvarez S, Marsh EL, LeNoble ME, Cho IJ, Sivaguru M, et al. Cell wall proteome in the maize primary root elongation zone. II. Region-specific changes in water soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins under water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:1533–48. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.107250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spollen WG, Tao W, Valliyodan B, Chen K, Hejlek LG, Kim JJ, et al. Spatial distribution of transcript changes in the maize primary root elongation zone at low water potential. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Voothuluru P, Sharp RE. Apoplastic hydrogen peroxide in the growth zone of the maize primary root under water stress. I. Increased levels are specific to the apical region of growth maintenance. J Exp Bot. 2012 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers277. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davidson RM, Reeves PA, Manosalva PM, Leach JE. Germins: A diverse protein family important for crop improvement. Plant Sci. 2009;117:499–510. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liszkay A, van der Zalm E, Schopfer P. Production of reactive oxygen intermediates (O2-, H2O2, and OH) by maize roots and their role in wall loosening and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:3114–23, discussion 3001. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.044784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Córdoba-Pedregosa MC, Córdoba F, Villalba JM, González-Reyes JA. Zonal changes in ascorbate and hydrogen peroxide contents, peroxidase, and ascorbate-related enzyme activities in onion roots. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:697–706. doi: 10.1104/pp.012682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Møller IM, Sweetlove LJ. ROS signalling--specificity is required. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:370–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leach KA, Hejlek LG, Hearne LB, Nguyen HT, Sharp RE, Davis GL. Primary root elongation and abscisic acid levels of maize in response to water stress. Crop Sci. 2011;51:157–72. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.12.0708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Buckler ES, Gaut BS, McMullen MD. Molecular and functional diversity of maize. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9:172–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McMullen MD, Kresovich S, Villeda HS, Bradbury P, Li H, Sun Q, et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science. 2009;325:737–40. doi: 10.1126/science.1174320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu K, Goodman M, Muse S, Smith JS, Buckler E, Doebley J. Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics. 2003;165:2117–28. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ramalingam J, Vera Cruz CM, Kukreja K, Chittoor JM, Wu JL, Lee SW, et al. Candidate defense genes from rice, barley, and maize and their association with qualitative and quantitative resistance in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003;16:14–24. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McNally KL, Bruskiewich R, Mackill D, Buell CR, Leach JE, Leung H. Sequencing multiple and diverse rice varieties. Connecting whole-genome variation with phenotypes. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:26–31. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.077313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jahn CE, Mckay JK, Mauleon R, Stephens J, McNally KL, Bush DR, et al. Genetic variation in biomass traits among 20 diverse rice varieties. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:157–68. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.165654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ramputh AI, Arnason JT, Cass L, Simmonds JA. Reduced herbivory of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) on corn transformed with germin, a wheat oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Sci. 2002;162:431–40. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00584-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional material
psb-8-e23454-s01.pdf (207.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES