Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2012 Jan 19;14(3):700–703. doi: 10.1021/ol203166c

Efficient Domino Approaches to Multifunctionalized Fused Pyrroles and Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones

Bo Jiang 1,, Qiu-Yun Li 1,, Hao Zhang 1,, Shu-Jiang Tu 1,†,, Suresh Pindi 1,, Guigen Li 1,‡,
PMCID: PMC3676681  NIHMSID: NIHMS474115  PMID: 22260312

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms474115u1.jpg

Efficient domino approaches for the synthesis of multifunctionalized tricyclic fused pyrroles and dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones have been established. The reaction pathways were controlled by varying enaminones with different substituted patterns to give a series of new fused pyrroles and dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones selectively. The complete anti diastereoselectivity was achieved for the first reaction.


Polycyclic fused pyrroles are among the most ubiquitous heterocycles in nature and often referred to as “privileged structures” in drug discovery because of their biological activities such as antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antitumoral and antioxidant activities.1 In the past several decades, many methodologies for the synthesis of polycyclic fused pyrroles have been developed; most of them involved metal-catalyzed cascade cyclization of alkynes,2 rearrangement–cyclization of alkynol3a and alkynyl ketones,3b cycloketone annulations,4 and 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of much none derivatives.5 The development of new convenient and step-economical approaches to this family of heterocyclic compounds, producing less waste and by product, continues to be of considerable interest and important for modern organic and medicinal chemistry, particularly, for drug discovery and development. However, to the best of our knowledge, a one-pot synthesis of lactonized fused pyrroles via domino reaction involving intramolecular allylic activation has not been well documented yet.

In the meantime, there has been enormous interest in developing the direct and selective functionalization on allylic C–H bonds6,7 including the direct formations of C–O bonds.8 These methodologies would provide the intrinsic advantages, such as step-economy, high chemoselectivity and easy operation leading to “benign by design” of green synthesis.9 The design of efficient allylic lactonization without the use of metal catalysts has remained as a challenge at the forefront of organic chemistry.

In the past several years, we and others have developed a series of domino reactions that provided easy access to multiple functionalized ring structures of chemical and pharmaceutical interest.1012 We also established a new three-component domino reaction for the synthesis of multifunctionalized indole derivatives.10f The reaction is easy to perform simply by mixing readily available carboxylic acids, N-aryl enaminones, and arylglyoxal monohydrate under microwave (MW) irradiation. During the continuation of this project, we found that when N-aryl enaminones were replaced by N-amino acid counterparts, the reaction can be directed toward lactonization to form tricyclic fused pyrrole derivatives that can directly serve for pharmaceutical research (Scheme 1). In this paper, we disclose novel domino reactions for the synthesis of polyfunctionalized and tricyclic fused pyrroles and dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones. The attractive aspect of the present domino reaction is shown by the fact that the novel construction of two new rings including pyrrole and oxazinone skeletons and the direct C–O bond formation can be easily achieved via metal-free allylic lactonization in a one-pot operation.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

In the initial experiment, the enaminone 1a which was derived from glycine and 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1, 3-dione was subjected to the reaction with phenylglyoxal monohydrate (2a) under microwave (MW) irradiation. Various solvents, such as DMF, benzene, HOAc, EtOH, HCOOH, and CF3COOH, were employed as reaction media. Among these solvents, the first two aprotic ones (DMF and benzene) led to poor yields (<10%) even at an enhanced temperature of 80 °C under MW irradiation. The weak protic solvent, EtOH, resulted in product 3a in 38% isolated yield. We found that in acetic acid, 1a was converted into the product 3a in a good yield (81%). It turned out that acetic acid can serve not only as a suitable medium but also as an adequate Bronsted acid promoter for the present reaction, while the stronger acids, HCOOH and CF3COOH, led to much lower chemical yields (<15%).

With these optimized conditions in hand, we next examined the scope of the reaction by using readily available and common starting materials. As revealed in Table 1, a range of tricyclic fused indole derivatives can be formed under the optimized condition in good to excellent yields (65–89%). Enaminones derived from three different amino acids (R = H, Me and Et, 1ac) were proven to be suitable for this reaction. Meanwhile, a variety of aryl-glyoxal monohydrates 2 bearing either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups can react with above enaminones 1ac to give corresponding tricyclic fused pyrrole products 3ax (67%–89%). The performed enaminone substrate 1d can also participate in the reaction yielding products 3yz in good yields of 65–73%. Interestingly, the complete anti diatereoselectivity products 3fz was achieved as determined by 1HNMR and X-ray diffractional analyses. Furthermore, pyrrolo[3,2,1-kl]phenoxazin-3(4H)-one 3aa can be readily generated by reacting 2-aminophenol-derived enaminone 1e with arylglyoxal monohydrate under these conditions.

Table 1.

Domino Synthesis of Polycyclic Fused Pyrroles 3 under MWa

Entry Product Ar Timeb Yieldc/%
1 graphic file with name nihms474115t1.jpg
3a–3e
3a, Phenyl (2a) 20 81
2 3b, 4-Fluorophenyl (2b) 18 78
3 3c, 4-Chlorophenyl (2c) 18 80
4 3d, 3,4-Dichlorophenyl (2d) 16 83
5 3e, Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-6-yl (2e) 22 67
6 graphic file with name nihms474115t2.jpg
3f–3n
3f, Phenyl (2a) 22 86
7 3g, 4-Chlorophenyl (2c) 20 79
8 3h, 3,4-Dichlorophenyl (2d) 24 89
9 3i, 4-Bromophenyl (2f) 20 81
10 3j,4-Tolyl(2g) 30 84
11 graphic file with name nihms474115t3.jpg
3o–3x
3k, 4-Methoxyphenyl (2h) 30 80
12 31, 3-Methoxyphenyl (2i) 30 83
13 3m, Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-6-yl (2e) 28 78
14 3n, 3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl (2j) 32 71
15 3o, Phenyl (2a) 30 76
16 graphic file with name nihms474115t4.jpg
3y–3z
3p, 4-Fluorophenyl (2b) 30 84
17 3q, 4-Chlorophenyl (2c) 28 85
18 3r, 3,4-Dichlorophenyl (2d) 26 83
19 3s, 4-Bromophenyl (2f) 30 81
20 3t, 4-Tolyl (2g) 36 83
21 graphic file with name nihms474115t5.jpg
3aa
3u, 4-Methoxyphenyl (2h) 34 76
22 3w, 3-Methoxyphenyl (2i) 34 72
23 3v, Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-6-yl (2e) 30 70
24 3x, 3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl (2j) 36 74
25 3y, 4-Fluorophenyl (2b) 30 65
26 3z,4-Chlorophenyl (2c) 32 73
27 3aa, Phenyl (2a) 30 70
a

Reagents and conditions: HOAc (1.5 mL), 80 °C, microwave heating.

b

Time (min).

c

Isolated yields.

As usual, this reaction is easy to perform simply by mixing enaminones 1 and arylglyoxal monohydrates 2 in HOAc under microwave irradiation and exhibits the great substrate scope with respect to a range of enaminones and arylglyoxal monohydrates. In all cases, the complexity of resulting products from this new domino synthesis illustrates the remarkable chemo- and regioselectivity of the cyclic sequence originated from very simple and easily accessible starting materials. The resulting functionalities of these tricyclic fused pyrroles offer a great flexibility for further structural modifications. These amino lactone analogs are directly useful for drug design, discovery, and development and for peptide/protein mimetic research. For example, after the ester group is carefully hydrolyzed, a series of special N-protected α-amino acids can be obtained; concurrently, a hydroxyl group is attached onto the six-membered enaminone rings.13

The structural elucidation with stereo- and regiochemistry was unambiguously determined by NMR analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis of single crystals that were obtained by slow evaporation of the solvent, as represented by the case of [1,4]oxazino[2,3,4-hi]pyrroles 3p (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

X-ray structure of 3p.

After the synthesis of tricyclic fused pyrroles was achieved, we turned our attention to the formation of dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones that are another family of building blocks of pharmaceutical importance by using benzene-1,2-diamine-derived enaminones to replace their amino acid counterparts. Pleasantly, we found that the reactions of arylglyoxal monohydrates (2a, 2c, 2f, and 2g) with 3-(2-aminophenylamino)-5,5-dimethylcyclohex-2-enones (1eg) can smoothly occur in acetic acid under the above condition to give multifunctionalized dibenzo[b,e]-[1,4]diazepin-1-ones 4. The reactions can proceed to completion within shorter periods of 12–18 min at 60 °C (Scheme 2). As summarized in Table 2 the reaction also showed a great substrate, scope in which a series of electron-deficient or electron-withdrawing groups can be attached aromatic rings of 3-(2-aminophenylamino)-5,5-dimethylcyclohex-2-enones. The same situation existed for arylglyoxal monohydrates substrates to give good to excellent yields of 76–88% (4ai). For vicinal diamino moieties, both bromide and chloride were proven to tolerate the microwave irradiation at 60 °C. These functional groups provide many opportunities for further manipulations via cross-couplings.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Table 2.

Domino Synthesis of Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones 4 under MWa

entry 4 R3 Ar time, min yieldb/%
1 4a, H(1e) phenyl (2a) 12 85
2 4b H (1e) 4-chlorophenyl (2c) 14 84
3 4c H (1e) 4-tolyl (2g) 18 80
4 4d Cl (1f) phenyl (2a) 14 84
5 4e Cl (1f) 4-bromophenyl (2f) 14 81
6 4f Cl (1f) 4-tolyl (2g) 18 76
7 4g Me (1 g) phenyl (2a) 16 87
8 4h Me (1 g) 4-chlorophenyl (2c) 17 82
9 4i Me (1 g) 4-tolyl (2g) 14 88
a

Reagents and conditions: HOAc (1.5 mL), 60 °C, microwave heating.

b

Isolated yield.

Similar to our previous domino processes,10a–c the present two new reactions showed the following attractive characteristics: (1) the reaction can be performed at fast reaction rates and be finished within 12–36 min; (2) energy and manpower are saved for potential industrial production; (3) water is formed as the major byproduct, which belongs to environmentally friendly chemistry; (4) the convenient workup is needed via simple filtration since the products directly precipitate out of solution after the reaction mixtures are diluted with cold water, which belongs to GAP chemistry;14 (5) readily available starting materials of enaminones15 and arylglyoxal monohydrates16 can be employed. Besides the fact that up to two new rings including pyrrole and oxazinone skeletons were formed in a one-pot operation without using any metal catalysts or promoters, this rapid and efficient synthesis is truly rare, interesting and useful in organic chemistry, which was made possible by microwave irradiation while normal heating led to very limited success.

The mechanisms of these chemoselective domino reactions are proposed and shown in Scheme 3. An initial nucleophilic reaction of enaminones with protonated arylglyoxal monohydrates affords intermediate A. The key divergent steps in the present domino pathways depend on the nucleophilicity of amino group on the phenyl ring and carboxylic acid functionality. With the stronger nucleophilicity, NH2 group prefers to undergo second nucleophilic substitution of protonated arylglyoxal monohydrate and results in polysubstituted dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-ones 4. The weak nucleophilicity of hydroxy moiety from carboxylic acid can direct the intermediate A toward dehydration to yield imine-isomeric enaminones B, which subsequently undergo intramolecular cyclization leading to hydroindoles C. The 7-position of hydroindoles C can be activated to form an electrophilic center for coupling with carboxylic acid to give the final products, tricyclic fused pyrroles 3.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

In conclusion, novel domino reactions have been established for the synthesis of poly functionalized and tricyclic fused dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-1-one and pyrrole derivatives that are important building blocks for organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry. The reaction is easy to perform simply by mixing common reactants under microwave irradiation. The reaction can be performed to completion within 12–36 min with water as the major byproduct. The complete anti diastereoselectivity was achieved for the formation of tricyclic fused pyrrole derivatives. The workup and purification are convenient without the need of using traditional purifications of chromatography and recrystallization.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from the NSFC (Nos. 20928001, 21072163, 21002083, and 21102124) and PADA of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Science and Technology Support Program (No. BE2011045), Robert A. Welch Foundation (D-1361), and NIH (R21DA031860-01). We thank Mr. Patrick McDowell for his assistance.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Contributor Information

Shu-Jiang Tu, Email: laotu@xznu.edu.cn.

Guigen Li, Email: guigen.li@ttu.edu.

References

  • 1.(a) Jones RA, editor. Pyrroles, The Synthesis, Reactivity, and Physical Properties of Substituted Pyrroles, Part II. Wiley; New York: 1992. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jacobi PA, Coults LD, Guo JS, Leung SI. J Org Chem. 2000;65:205–213. doi: 10.1021/jo991503u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Furstner A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:3528–3603. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fürstner A, Szillat H, Gabor B, Mynott R. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:8305–8314. [Google Scholar]; (e) Jones RA, Bean GP. The Chemistry of Pyrroles. Academic Press; London: 1977. [Google Scholar]; (f) Lipshutz BH. Chem Rev. 1986;86:795–820. [Google Scholar]; (g) Balme G. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:6238–6241. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Li G, Huang X, Zhang L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:346–349. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kusama H, Takaya J, Iwasawa N. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:11592–11593. doi: 10.1021/ja027589h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hirano K, Inaba Y, Takahashi N, Shimano M, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H. J Org Chem. 2011;76:1212–1227. doi: 10.1021/jo102507c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Martin R, Rivero MR, Buchwald SL. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:7079–7082. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Zhao X, Zhang E, Tu YQ, Zhang YQ, Yuan DY, Cao K, Fan CA, Zhang FM. Org Lett. 2009;11:4002–4004. doi: 10.1021/ol901649p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Schwier T, Sromek AW, Yap DML, Chernyak D, Gevorgyan V. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:9868–9878. doi: 10.1021/ja072446m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nagafuji P, Cushman M. J Org Chem. 1996;61:4999–5003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hershenson FM. J Org Chem. 1972;37:3111–3113. [Google Scholar]; J Org Chem. 1975;40:740–743. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For key references, see: Reed SA, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3316–3318. doi: 10.1021/ja710206u.Fraunhoffer KJ, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7274–7276. doi: 10.1021/ja071905g.Delcamp JH, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15076–15077. doi: 10.1021/ja066563d.Fraunhoffer KJ, Prabagaran N, Sirois LE, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9032–9033. doi: 10.1021/ja063096r.Chen MS, Prabagaran N, Labenz NA, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:6970–6971. doi: 10.1021/ja0500198.Fraunhoffer KJ, Bachovchin DA, White MC. Org Lett. 2005;7:223–226. doi: 10.1021/ol047800p.Chen MS, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:1346. doi: 10.1021/ja039107n.Reed SA, Mazzotti AR, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:11701–11706. doi: 10.1021/ja903939k.Young AJ, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14090–14091. doi: 10.1021/ja806867p.
  • 7.For representative examples of sp3 C–H bond functionalization, see: Li Z, Li CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:56–57. doi: 10.1021/ja056541b.Li Z, Bohle DS, Li CJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8928–8933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601687103.Li Z, Li CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:11810–11811. doi: 10.1021/ja0460763.Li Z, Cao L, Li CJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:6505–6507. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701782.Zhang Y, Li CJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:1949–1952. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503255.Li Z, Li CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:6968–6969. doi: 10.1021/ja0516054.Li Z, Li CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3672–3673. doi: 10.1021/ja050058j.Zhang Y, Li CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4242–4243. doi: 10.1021/ja060050p.Stuart DR, Fagnou K. Science. 2007;316:1172–1175. doi: 10.1126/science.1141956.Dwight TA, Rue NR, Charyk D, Josselyn R, DeBoef B. Org Lett. 2007;9:3137–3139. doi: 10.1021/ol071308z.
  • 8.Lee JM, Park EJ, Cho SH, Chang S. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7824–7825. doi: 10.1021/ja8031218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Winterton N. Green Chem. 2001;3:G73–G75. [Google Scholar]; (b) Anastas PT, Warner JC. Green Chemistry Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press; New York: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Jiang B, Li C, Shi F, Tu SJ, Kaur P, Wever W, Li G. J Org Chem. 2010;75:2962–2965. doi: 10.1021/jo1002278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jiang B, Tu SJ, Kaur P, Wever W, Li G. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:11660–11661. doi: 10.1021/ja904011s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jiang B, Wang X, Shi F, Tu SJ, Ai T, Ballew A, Li G. J Org Chem. 2009;74:9486–9489. doi: 10.1021/jo902204s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li G, Wei HX, Kim SH, Carducci MD. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2001;40:4277–4280. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011119)40:22<4277::AID-ANIE4277>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Ma N, Jiang B, Zhang G, Tu SJ, Wever W, Li G. Green Chem. 2010;12:1357–1361. [Google Scholar]; (f) Jiang B, Yi MS, Shi F, Tu SJ, Pindi S, McDowell P, Li G. Chem Commun. 2011:808–810. doi: 10.1039/c1cc15913e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.For domino reactions and atom economic synthesis see refs 11 and 12: Tietze LF, Brasche G, Gericke KM. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. Tietze LF, Brazel CC, Hoelsken S, Magull J, Ringe A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:5246–5249. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800626.Trost BM. Science. 1991;254:1471–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1962206.Padwa A. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:3072–3081. doi: 10.1039/b816701j.Padwa A, Bur SK. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:5341–5378. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.03.158.
  • 12.(a) Huang Y, Walji AM, Larsen CH, MacMillan DWC. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:15051–15053. doi: 10.1021/ja055545d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lu M, Zhu D, Lu Y, Hou Y, Tan B, Zhong G. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:10187–10191. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Snyder SA, Breazzano SP, Ross AG, Lin Y, Zografos AL. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:1753–1765. doi: 10.1021/ja806183r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Yang JW, Fonseca MTH, List B. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:15036–15037. doi: 10.1021/ja055735o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Paquette LA. J Org Chem. 1964;29:3447–3449. [Google Scholar]; (b) Paquette LA, Broadhurst MJ. J Org Chem. 1973;38:1886–1893. [Google Scholar]; (c) Sato E, Ikeda Y, Kanaoka Y. Lieb Ann Chem. 1989;8:781–788. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.For Group-Assistant-Purification chemistry, see: Kaur P, Pindi S, Wever W, Rajale T, Li G. Chem Commun. 2010;46:4330–4332. doi: 10.1039/c0cc00287a.Kaur P, Pindi S, Wever W, Rajale T, Li G. J Org Chem. 2010;75:5144–5150. doi: 10.1021/jo100865q.Kattuboina A, Li G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:1573–1577.Kattuboina A, Kaur P, Ai T, Li G. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2008;71:216–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00633.x.Kattuboina A, Kaur P, Nguyen T, Li G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:3722–3724.Kaur P, Nguyen T, Li G. Eur J Org Chem. 2009:912–916.
  • 15.The preparation of enaminones, see: Tu SJ, Li CM, Li G, Cao LJ, Shao QQ, Zhou DX, Jiang B, Zhou JF, Xiao M. J Comb Chem. 2007;9:1144–1148. doi: 10.1021/cc700124g.Bhosale RS, Suryawanshi PA, Ingle SA, Lokhande MN, More SP, Mane SB, Bhosale SV, Pawar RP. Synlett. 2006:933–935.
  • 16.For the preparation of arylglyoxal monohydrates, see: Wang K, Shi W, Jia J, Chen SM, Ma HM. Talanta. 2009;77:1795–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.10.021.Fodor G, Kovacs O. J Am Chem Soc. 1949;71:1045–1048. doi: 10.1021/ja01171a079.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES