Abstract
Isolated congenital asplenia (ICA) is characterized by the absence of a spleen at birth in individuals with no other developmental defects. The patients are prone to life-threatening bacterial infections. The unbiased analysis of exomes revealed heterozygous mutations in RPSA in 18 patients from eight kindreds, corresponding to more than half the patients and over one third of the kindreds studied. The clinical penetrance in these kindreds is complete. Expression studies indicated that the mutations carried by the patients - a nonsense, a frameshift duplication and five different missense - cause autosomal dominant ICA by haploinsufficiency. Population genetic studies showed that RPSA was subject to purifying selection. RPSA encodes ribosomal protein SA, a component of the small subunit of the ribosome. This discovery establishes an essential role for RPSA in human spleen development.
Patients with isolated congenital asplenia (ICA) are born without a spleen and display no other known developmental anomalies (MIM 271400) (1-3). Only 73 patients from 48 kindreds have been reported to date (1,3-6). We recruited an international cohort of 33 ICA patients from 23 kindreds (fig. S1, table S1). Most patients with ICA, particularly the index cases, died in childhood from invasive bacterial disease (1). Due to the high proportion of familial cases (1), we hypothesized that ICA might result from single-gene inborn errors of spleen development. Moreover, ICA seems to segregate as an autosomal dominant (AD) trait in five multiplex kindreds (A-E in fig. S1). We have reported a candidate heterozygous mutation in NKX2-5 in one kindred with AD ICA (7), but the genetic etiology of ICA remains essentially unknown. We therefore set out to decipher the main genetic etiology of ICA, both to cast light on the development of the human spleen and to guide clinical care and genetic counseling in families with ICA.
Given the apparent clinical homogeneity of the ICA patients, we hypothesized that there would be at least some genetic homogeneity among the 23 kindreds studied. We therefore sequenced one exome (8-11) from each of the 23 kindreds, including the kindred bearing the NKX2-5 mutation, and analyzed them together (fig. S1, table S2). We hypothesized that the disease-causing variants would be very rare, due to the rarity of ICA (1). We also gave priority to coding mutations predicted not to be silent (non-synonymous). We found that 764 genes in at least two ICA kindreds carried very rare and non-synonymous mutations (table S3). We performed the same analysis on 508 control exomes sequenced in-house (table S4), to identify the best candidate morbid gene for ICA. We then used the results of these two analyses (comparison of ICA and controls) to test the null hypothesis that mutations in a given gene were not specific to ICA, by calculating the p-value for each gene in Fisher’s exact test. RPSA had a highly significant p-value of 2.89 × 10−11 (Fig. 1A), indicating that mutations in this gene were specific to the ICA cohort. The coding region of RPSA carried very rare non-synonymous variants in eight of 23 ICA kindreds and in only one of the 508 control exomes. No other gene had a statistically significant p-value (table S5).
RPSA encodes the ribosomal protein (RP) SA. The genes encoding RPs have numerous pseudogenes (12), which can hinder their sequencing. RPSA has 61 processed pseudogenes (table S6) (12). We thus Sanger sequenced all coding exons of RPSA in all 33 ICA patients, using primers mapping to the introns of RPSA, which cannot amplify RPSA pseudogenes (13). Eighteen of the 33 patients (55%) had RPSA mutations (Fig. 1B, fig. S2). Altogether, we identified seven mutations in eight kindreds: one frameshift duplication (p.P199SfsX25), one nonsense (p.Q9X) and five missense mutations, including the recurrent p.R180G mutation (table S7). A missense mutation, p.M185V, was identified in one control exome from a patient displaying severe viral infection, but not ICA. The seven ICA mutations were not present in more than 10,000 alleles reported in public databases (table S8). Moreover, the five ICA-associated missense mutations affected residues strictly conserved in mammals, vertebrates, and even yeast (fig. S3). All ICA patients in these eight kindreds carried a mutation in RPSA and all individuals carrying RPSA mutations displayed ICA (Fig. 1B).
Strikingly, neither of the two parents carried an RPSA mutation in kindreds F, O and T, although a mutation was found in the two affected siblings in kindred F and in the sporadic patients in kindreds O and T (Fig. 1B). Microsatellite analysis confirmed the parental relationships of the samples (table S9, fig. S4). Thus, mutations in kindreds O and T appeared de novo and resulted from a germline mosaicism in kindred F. Moreover, a comparison of the haplotypes at the RPSA locus between patients from families A and D showed that the p.R180G mutation was not inherited from a common ancestor (a founder effect), but had instead occurred twice, independently (fig. S5). This is consistent with the complete penetrance of RPSA mutations for ICA and the high mortality of ICA, because a founder effect would require the existence of multiple generations of healthy RPSA heterozygotes (fig. S5), before the advent of antibiotics. Collectively, these genetic results suggest that heterozygous coding mutations in RPSA underlie most cases of ICA, with apparently complete clinical penetrance. In particular, heterozygous coding mutations in RPSA were found to underlie ICA in all multiplex kindreds displaying an AD pattern of inheritance studied, including the kindred with the heterozygous mutation in NKX2-5 (ICA-B, (7)).
Our identification of two mutations resulting in a premature termination codon (p.Q9X and p.P199SfsX25) led us to hypothesize that haploinsufficiency at the RPSA locus might underlie AD ICA. TA-cloning of cDNA generated from activated T cells of three patients from family C showed that less than 10% (12/160) of the transcripts carried the P199SfsX25 mutation (Fig. 2A), suggesting that the mRNAs generated from the mutated allele were subject to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (fig. S6). RPSA mRNA levels in activated T cells from these patients were only half those in their healthy relative (Fig. 2B). We then investigated the missense mutations, by overproducing the N-terminally FLAG-tagged mutant and WT proteins in HEK293T cells. The mutant proteins were produced in much smaller amounts than the WT protein (Fig. 2C). We next determined whether RPSA was under purifying selection in the general population. RPSA is at the 2.8th percentile with respect to a metric of purifying selection (Fig. 2D) (14) among ~15,000 genes exome-sequenced by the 1,000 Genomes Project (15). These data suggest that heterozygosity for null RPSA alleles underlies AD ICA, possibly accounting for the strong purifying selection acting on these alleles in the population.
It is surprising that germline mutations in RPSA cause a spleen-specific developmental defect. RPSA is ubiquitously expressed. RPSA is involved in pre-rRNA processing (16), and is part of the small subunit of the ribosome (17). RPSA was not known to be involved in spleen development, which is controlled by a cascade of transcription factors (e.g. Tlx1, Nkx2-5, Wt1) in mice (7, 18). Moreover, haploinsufficiency of any of 10 other RPs, including RPS19, is associated with Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA), which is characterized by bone marrow failure and a broad range of developmental defects, ranging from craniofacial defects to thumb abnormalities (19-21). Patients with RPSA mutations present none of these phenotypes (table S10). Conversely, DBA patients mutated in other RPs display no spleen abnormalities. At the cellular level, there was no pre-rRNA processing defect in activated lymphocytes from RPSA-mutated ICA patients (fig. S7), contrasting with the pre-rRNA processing defects observed in all RP-mutated DBA patients (20). Lastly, heterozygosity for a null Rpsa allele in the mouse is not associated with ICA (fig. S8, table S11). We do not yet understand the pathogenesis of ICA. However, the emerging idea that ribosomes can be “specialized” might account for the narrow phenotype caused by mutations in RPSA (22). The surprising connection between RPSA and spleen development in humans calls for explorations of the underlying mechanisms.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and their families. We thank A. Belkadi, M. Bensifi, M. Chrabieh, T. Kochetkov, and N. Wang for technical help; I. Ionita-Laza, V. Lougaris, and all members of the laboratory for fruitful discussions. This work was supported in part by the March of Dimes (#1-FY12-440), St. Giles Foundation, National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Sciences (NCATS) grant number 8UL1TR000043, and grant number R01HD061403 from the National Institutes of Health, Rockefeller University, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Fondazione C. Golgi of Brescia, and Paris Descartes University. The raw sequence data is available on the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database: Bioproject SRP018839.
Footnotes
This manuscript has been accepted for publication in Science. This version has not undergone final editing. Please refer to the complete version of record at http://www.sciencemag.org/. The manuscript may not be reproduced or used in any manner that does not fall within the fair use provisions of the Copyright Act without the prior, written permission of AAAS.
References and Notes
- 1.Mahlaoui N, et al. J Pediatr. 2011 Jan;158:142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casanova JL, Abel L. Science. 2007 Aug 3;317:617. doi: 10.1126/science.1142963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Myerson RM, Koelle WA. N Engl J Med. 1956 Jun 14;254:1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195606142542406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Almoznino-Sarafian D, et al. Acta Haematol. 2007 Dec;118:226. doi: 10.1159/000112308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Imashuku S, Kudo N, Kubo K, Takahashi N, Tohyama K. Int J Hematol. 2012 Jun;95:702. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1082-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uchida Y, et al. J Infect Chemother. 2012 Aug 18;18:576. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0341-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koss M, et al. Dev Cell. 2012 May 15;22:913. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ng SB, et al. Nat Genet. 2010 Jan;42:30. doi: 10.1038/ng.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Byun M, et al. J Exp Med. 2010 Oct 25;207:2307. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu L, et al. J Exp Med. 2011 Aug 1;208:1635. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bamshad MJ, et al. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Nov;12:745. doi: 10.1038/nrg3031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Balasubramanian S, et al. Genome Biol. 2009 Jan;10:R2. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Material and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
- 14.Eilertson KE, Booth JG, Bustamante CD. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012 Dec;8:e1002806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abecasis GR, et al. Nature. 2012 Nov 1;491:56. [Google Scholar]
- 16.O’Donohue MF, Choesmel V, Faubladier M, Fichant G, Gleizes PE. J Cell Biol. 2010 Sep 6;190:853. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201005117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ben-Shem A, et al. Science. 2011 Dec 16;334:1524. doi: 10.1126/science.1212642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brendolan A, Rosado MM, Carsetti R, Selleri L, Dear TN. Bioessays. 2007 Feb;29:166. doi: 10.1002/bies.20528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Draptchinskaia N, et al. Nat Genet. 1999 Feb;21:169. doi: 10.1038/5951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gazda HT, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Dec;83:769. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lipton JM, Ellis SR. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Feb;22:12. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328334573b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xue S, Barna M. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Jun;13:355. doi: 10.1038/nrm3359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li H, Durbin R. Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25:1754. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McKenna A, et al. Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20:1297. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li H, et al. Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25:2078. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bolze A, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Dec 10;87:873. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bogunovic D, et al. Science. 2012 Sep 28;337:1684. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Z, Harrison P, Gerstein M. Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12:1466. doi: 10.1101/gr.331902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ollila J, Lappalainen I, Vihinen M. FEBS Lett. 1996 Nov 4;396:119. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Simossis VA, Heringa J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33:W289. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jenner L, et al. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012 Aug 8;22:759. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hashem Y, et al. Nature. 2013 Feb 21;494:385. doi: 10.1038/nature11872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li H. Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 1;27:718. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cingolani P, et al. Fly (Austin) 2012 Apr-Jun;6:80. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Flygare J, et al. Blood. 2007 Feb 1;109:980. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Maquat LE. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Feb;5:89. doi: 10.1038/nrm1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ferlicot S, Emile JF, Le Bris JL, Cheron G, Brousse N. Ann Pathol. 1997 Mar;17:44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahmed SA, Zengeya S, Kini U, Pollard AJ. Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;169:315. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.