Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2011 Jun 3;50(25):5757–5766. doi: 10.1021/bi2001856

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Superposition of the structures of the E2~SUMO thioester conjugate from the last 50 ns of simulations in the absence (A) and presence (B) of the E3. A structure from every 5 ns was taken for the superposition. The superposition minimized the root-mean-square-deviation of the E2 only; thus fluctuation in the SUMO structures reflects variations in the relative positioning between the two proteins in the thioester conjugate.