Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012 Oct;22(10):758–763. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328354455c

Very important pharmacogene summary for VDR

Audrey H Poon a,g,h, Li Gong e, Charlotte Brasch-Andersen i, Augusto A Litonjua a,b,c, Benjamin A Raby a,b, Qutayba Hamid g, Catherine Laprise h, Scott T Weiss a,c,d, Russ B Altman e,f, Teri E Klein e
PMCID: PMC3678550  NIHMSID: NIHMS465366  PMID: 22588316

Introduction

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) binds the active form of vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3). It belongs to the family of trans-acting transcriptional regulatory factors and shows sequence similarity to the steroid and thyroid hormone receptors. The gene was cloned by Baker and colleagues in 1988 and maps to chromosome 12q13.11 [1]. It consists of nine exons with at least six isoforms of exon 1, spans 63.5 kb, and encodes a 427 amino acid protein [2]. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding the VDR protein of different lengths [3,4].

The interaction of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 with VDR modulates many biological activities of the neural, immune, and endocrine systems, including calcium and phosphorous homeostasis, apoptosis, and cell differentiation (reviewed by Hewison and colleagues [5-7]). Its pleiotropic property is reflected by the findings that VDR is expressed in at least 37 tissues, which can roughly be grouped into seven biological systems (calcium homeostasis, immune, pancreatic β cells, muscle, cardiovascular, brain, and lung) [8-10]. The most characterized mechanism is the binding of vitamin D3 to nuclear VDR, which activates the receptor to form a heterodimer with the retinoid-X receptor and interacts with a specific DNA sequence on the gene promoter regions called the ‘vitamin D response element’ (VDRE). Transcription repressors occupying the VDRE are then replaced by transcription activators to initiate transcription of targeted genes. Microarray analyses using different human cell lines have identified over 100 genes with VDREs in the promoter regions, all potential targets of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3–VDR complex [11-13]. In human oral squamous carcinoma SCC25 cells, genes with characterized VDREs and of which demonstrated greater than 10-fold increase after treatment with 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 include 24-hydroxylase (CYP24), 17β-hydroxy-steroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B2), CD14 (CD14), type XIII collagen (COL13A1), and 5-lipoxygenase (ALOX5) [13]. The effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by binding to VDR in the nucleus is often described as the slow-acting genomic effect; the effect will take days or hours to be noticed.

Alternatively, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 can bind to VDR located in the caveolae in the plasma membrane to exert rapid responses through production of second messengers [14]. Pathways that have been shown to be activated by the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3–VDR[memb] complex include mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent [15], cAMP-dependent [16], phospholipase A2-dependent [17], phospholipase C-dependent [18], phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent [19], and protein kinase C-dependent [20] pathways. Examples of such rapid response include rapid Ca2+ absorption in the duodenum [21,22], opening of Cl channels and secretion in osteoblasts, insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells [23,24], and vascular smooth muscle cell migration [19].

VDR variations

Because of the pleiotropic effect exerted by the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3–VDR complex, its genetic variants have been found to be associated with a wide variety of diseases/phenotypes, including various types of cancer, tuberculosis, asthma, height, longevity/mortality, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, bone mineral density (BMD), and hyperparathyroidism, as reviewed comprehensively elsewhere [25,26]. This study focuses on clinically relevant associations between treatment responses in the presence of VDR genetic polymorphisms. Furthermore, although no VDR polymorphism has been reported to be associated with vitamin D treatment in cancer therapy, the findings that VDR expression is reduced in colon cancer and negatively correlated with progression imply a role of VDR protein expression in treatment response [27-29].

In a comprehensive study of the genetic architecture of VDR, areas of low linkage disequilibrium (LD) and areas of high LD were observed [30]. This study further noted that the number and size of LD blocks are different in whites, Han Chinese, and Africans. In whites, four blocks were found at the 5′ end, and the largest block encompassed exons 4–9 and 3′ UTR. The LD structure in Han Chinese is similar to that of whites but that of African Americans is substantially fragmented and different from that of whites and Han Chinese. The 5′ promoter variants Cdx2 and GATA reside in block 2, and the three widely studied 3′ variants BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI are located in block 5; variant FokI does not reside in any block and is located between blocks 2 and 3. However, further analysis of this genomic area showed that the three variants do not capture all the information in the block [31]. (Note: In the nomenclature of the variants, the alleles are conventionally defined by capital letters in the absence of a restriction site and by small letters in the presence of a given restriction site; for example, TaqI T and C alleles are named T and t, respectively. To avoid confusion this review will only use the allele corresponding to the nucleic acid.) This review highlights the pharmacogenetic effects of VDR polymorphisms in various biological systems. Table 1 summarizes the functional effect and associated phenotypes of genetic variants in the VDR gene.

Table 1.

The functional effect and associated phenotype of genetic variants in the VDR gene

SNP Functional consequence Medical condition Treatment Associated phenotypes
rs11568820 A >G eliminates Cdx
 binding site
Childhood acute lymphoblastic
 leukemia
Dexamethasone Fat gain, BMD, and apparent BMD of the lumbar
 spine [32]
X-linked hypophosphatemic ricket
 patients
1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Growth defect and urinary calcium/keratinise
 levels [33]
Prostate cancer risk Low-calcium diet Prostate cancer risk [34]
Psoriasis Calcipotriol Calcipotriol response [35]
rs4516035 T>C eliminates GATA
 binding site
Childhood acute lymphoblastic
 leukemia
Dexamethasone Fat gain, BMD and apparent BMD [32]
X-linked hypophosphatemic
 ricket patients
1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Growth defect and urinary calcium/keratinise
 levels [33]
rs2228570 T>C eliminates translation
 start site
Puberty Not applicable Calcium absorption and calcium accretion to
 skeleton [36]
Childhood Not applicable Calcium absorption and BMD [37]
Osteoporosis or osteopenia Calcium and vitamin D Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels [38]
Psoriasis Calcipotriol Calcipotriol response [35]
Tuberculosis Antimycobacterial
 chemotherapy
Sputum mycobacterial culture conversion [39]
Thyroid cancer VDR agonist Cell viability [40]
Breast cancer 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Growth inhibition [41]
rs731236 T>C methylation site Psoriasis Calcipotriol Calcipotriol response [42]
Tuberculosis Not applicable Tuberculosis susceptibility [43]
Postmenopausal women Calcium supplement New fracture [44]
Adolescent girls Vitamin D supplement Spine and femoral neck BMC and femoral neck
 area [45]
Chronic plaque psoriasis Narrowband ultraviolet
 light
Remission period [46]
rs1544410 C>T, unknown functional
 consequence
Postmenopausal women Antiresorptive treatment BMD, bone formation and bone resorption [47]
Postmenopausal women Antisorptive treatment BMD [48]
Adolescent girls Vitamin D supplement BMC [45]
Epilesy Antiepileptic treatment BMD, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level and
 parathormone level [49]
rs7975232 C>A, unknown functional
 consequence
Colorectal cancer Dairy product intake Colorectal cancer recurrence [50]

BMD, bone mineral density; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; VDR, vitamin D receptor.

Important variants

5′ variants

VDR: rs11568820 (A > G, commonly known as Cdx2) and rs4516035 (T > C, commonly known as GATA)

Two functional variants lying in an LD block in the promoter region captured the genetic information around exons 1e and 1a and are often analyzed as a haplotype block [51]. These two variants are commonly known as Cdx2 (rs11568820) and GATA (rs4516035). Variant rs11568820 resides in the binding site of transcription factor Cdx2, upstream of exon 1e. Functional analyses showed that the A to G base substitution (referring to the minus strand) eliminates the Cdx binding site and reduces transcriptional activity of VDR to 70% of the A allele [52,53]. The frequency of allele A ranges from 50% in Asians to 80% in Europeans to 98% in Sub-Saharan Africans, as estimated by the HapMap Project [54]. Downstream is variant rs4516035, which resides at the GATA binding site, and its C allele eliminates the GATA binding site and confers a lower VDR promoter activity [51]. The frequency of allele T ranges from 50% in Europeans to 98% in Asians to 99% in Sub-Saharan Africans [54]. Allele Tof GATA is found to have a 1.9-fold higher VDR promoter activity compared with allele C [51]. In a study on 69 Dutch children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the effect of dexamethasone treatment on body composition was investigated. It was found that, during treatment, noncarriers of haplotype Cdx2 allele A/GATA allele C had greater fat gain and higher BMD and apparent BMD of the lumbar spine compared with the carriers [32]. In another study that examined the effect of VDR polymorphisms on growth and treatment response of 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 derivatives, vitamin D3, and phosphates to X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets, patients who were treated with 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 since childhood experienced less growth defect compared with those not treated with 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 [33]. When the Cdx2/GATA haplotypes of these patients were considered, patients who had been treated with 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 since childhood and were carriers of Cdx2 G/GATA C haplotype experienced less growth defect compared with noncarriers. In children receiving 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 and who were carriers of Cdx2 G/GATA C haplotype, a lower urinary calcium/creatinine level was detected compared with noncarriers, suggesting that Cdx2 G/GATA C may protect these children from developing hypercalciuria during treatment. Taken together, these studies showed that carriers of Cdx2 G/GATA C and Cdx2 G/GATA T haplotypes were at lower risk of having bone-related side effects from treatment with 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 and dexamethasone.

In a recent study that examined the effect of VDR genotypes, calcium intake, and prostate cancer in African Americans, carriers of the Cdx2 GG genotype were found to be at a lower risk (roughly 40% of men of AA genotype) of developing advanced cancer, and such risk was further reduced (8% of men of AA genotype) when coupled with a low-calcium diet [34]. The authors noted that the same association was not observed with localized prostate cancer, suggesting that high calcium intake is not involved in the initiation but progression of prostate cancer.

VDR: rs2228570 (T > C, commonly known as FokI)

At the translation start site of VDR, a T > C base change of variant rs2228570 eliminates the translation start site in exon 2, and the encoded protein is shortened by three amino acids [55]. The frequency of allele T ranges from 40% in whites and Asians to 20% in Sub-Saharan Africans [54]. The smaller protein exhibits greater transcription activity because of its greater binding efficiency to transcription factor IIB [56]. In immune cells, transcripts with the C allele (often referred to as allele F of FokI polymorphism) demonstrated stronger transcriptional effect of VDR target genes [57]. Given the pivotal role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium absorption, variant FokI has been studied for its association with calcium absorption, BMD, and other anthropometric measures. In an association study of calcium absorption kinetics, bone mineralization rates, and VDR polymorphisms in early pubertal adolescents, individuals with the TT genotype had less total calcium absorption, and less calcium accretion to the skeleton [36]. In an earlier study, children with the TT genotype were found to have lower calcium absorption and lower BMD, after adjusting for age, ethnicity, BMI, and puberty status [37]. In a study on 36 white postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia who were treated with calcium and vitamin D supplements for 3 months, the FokI TC genotype was more common in responders compared with nonresponders [38].

In a study that examined the genotypic effect of VDR polymorphism and calcipotriol response in white psoriasis patients, variant FokI alone was not associated with any significant effect; however, when analyzed in combination with variant Cdx2, patients with the Cdx2 AA/FokI CC genotype combination were four times more likely to respond to calcipotriol [35]. Furthermore, additional variant combinations found to be associated with calcipotriol response were Cdx2 AA/TaqI TT and FokI CC/TaqI TT. A similar association with positive response to calcipotriol in psoriasis patients was detected in a Turkish population [42].

In a study that examined the VDR genetic effect on treatment response of antimycobacterial chemotherapy against tuberculosis in Peruvian patients, carriers of the FokI CC genotype had faster conversion of sputum mycobacterial culture from positive to negative compared with non-CC genotype carriers [39].

In an in-vitro study on thyroid cancer, thyroid cancer cell lines that had significant decrease in cell viability after VDR agonist treatment were found to be those carrying the FokI TT genotype, whereas those of CC genotype were resistant [40]. Further analysis of the mRNA level of 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) and 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1) suggested that the C allele may confer resistance by upregulation of 24-hydroxylase and subsequent suppression on VDR activation. However, in an in-vitro study on breast cancer, carriers of the CC genotype were found to have the greatest growth inhibition compared with the TT genotype and vector control after treatment with 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 [41]. VDR protein level was found to be elevated in the CC, TT genotype carriers and vector control, with CC genotype carriers exhibiting the highest elevation. CYP24A1, a downstream target gene, was upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels after 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment, with the CC genotype carriers exhibiting the greatest elevation. In contrast, the protein level of another downstream target, estrogen receptor α (ESR1), was downregulated after treatment, and cells with the CC genotype exhibited the greatest protein suppression. Furthermore, estrogen-induced cell growth was inhibited by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the cells with the CC genotype but not in the TT genotype counterparts. In the same study the authors demonstrated greater VDR protein stability and longer half-life after 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 treatment in cells carrying the CC genotype compared with vector control and the TT counterparts.

3′ variants

VDR: rs1544410 (C > T, commonly known as BsmI)

This variant is commonly known as BsmI and is located in intron 8 (allele C is commonly referred to as allele b and allele T is referred as allele B). No known functional consequence of this variant has been described; however, a few studies have found that it is associated with antiresorptive treatment responses [40,41,47,48]. In a study on the effectiveness of antiresorptive treatment in postmenopausal women, treatment outcomes (i.e. BMD, bone formation and bone resorption) were found to be influenced by treatment arms, genotype at variant BsmI and treatment arms × genotype interactions [47]. Women with the CC genotype had greater improvement in BMD after treatment compared with those with the TT genotype, regardless of the treatment arms. Decrease in bone formation after treatment was the least in CC women compared with their CTand TTcounterparts. Homozygous CC women also demonstrated the least decrease in bone resorption compared with the other two genotype groups. In a pilot study on antiresorptive treatment (oral alendronate vs. subcutaneous teriparatide) in postmenopausal women, women who received alendronate and had at least one allele C had greater BMD at their lumbar spine compared with those with the TT genotype [48]. In addition to a genotypic effect toward antiresorptive treatment, BsmI is also associated with response to calcium and vitamin D supplementation in healthy adolescent girls [58]. In a study on 167 adolescent girls from Lebanon, placebo and vitamin D supplements were given randomly for a year, and bone mineral content (BMC), BMD, and lean mass were measured as outcomes [45]. In the treatment group, percentage change in BMC of the total body, hip, and trochanter were significantly greater in CT heterozygous individuals compared with CT nontreated controls. A similar trend was observed in CC girls, although it did not reach statistical significance. In a study that investigated the effect of longterm antiepileptic treatment on BMD in men and premenopausal women, those with the CC genotypes had higher BMD, higher serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, and lower level of parathormone, compared with those with the CT and TT genotypes [49].

VDR: rs7975232 (C > A, commonly known as ApaI)

This variant is commonly known as ApaI and is located in intron 8 (allele A is often referred to as allele A and allele C is allele a). At present, no known functional consequence of this variant has been described. In a study that investigated the effect of dairy intake and colorectal cancer recurrence, an interaction between ApaI genotype and dairy product intake was detected [50]. In particular, individuals with at least one copy of allele A and who consumed a large amount of dairy products had the lowest risk of colorectral cancer recurrence compared with CC genotype carriers who consumed lower amounts of dairy products.

VDR: rs731236 (T > C, commonly known as TaqI)

This variant is commonly known as TaqI and is located in exon 9 (allele T is often referred to as allele T, and allele C is allele t). In a study on tuberculosis susceptibility, it has been demonstrated in lymphoblastoid cell lines that this variant resides on a CpG island and the C allele is always methylated, and that interactions exist between TaqI polymorphism, methylation levels, ethnicities, and tuberculosis susceptibility [43].

In a multivariate study investigating the interaction between therapy and VDR variants, allele C confers increased risk to new fracture in postmenopausal women treated with calcium supplement in Australia [44]. Healthy adolescent girls with the TT genotype had greater spine and femoral neck BMC and femoral neck area when given vitamin D supplement, compared with the CC group [45]. In a study using narrowband ultraviolet light to treat chronic plaque psoriasis, individuals with the CC genotype had the shortest remission period compared with the other genotypes [46]. In another study that examined the VDR genetic effect on treatment response of antimycobacterial chemotherapy against tuberculosis in Peruvian patients, variant FokI CC and TaqI CT genotypes were both found to be associated with faster conversion of sputum mycobacterial culture from positive to negative [39].

Conclusion

The pleiotropic effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on a wide range of physiological systems render its receptor VDR an attractive candidate for investigation in disease mechanism and therapeutic responses. Of the six conventionally investigated variants, those at the 5′ end have the biological consequence of the base change characterized. Recently, the biological effect of the base change at the TaqI variant was also characterized as aforementioned. It is likely that the associations observed for variants BsmI and ApaI are due to linkage disequilibrium with the causative variant(s). Given the vast number of genes whose transcription can be upregulated or downregulated by VDR, an allele may be a risk factor for one trait and a protective one for another. Although the scientific community agrees that the present guidelines for vitamin D intake must be augmented, one must take into account the differential activity of the VDR protein as partially dictated by variations in the VDR gene.

This PharmGKB summary briefly discusses the very important pharmacogene VDR and its variants that can influence drug responses. A fully interactive version of this short review, with links to individual paper and detailed mapping information, can be found at http://www.pharmgkb.org/search/annotatedGene/vdr/index.jsp.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Baker AR, McDonnell DP, Hughes M, Crisp TM, Mangelsdorf DJ, Haussler MR, et al. Cloning and expression of full-length cDNA encoding human vitamin D receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:3294–3298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyamoto K, Kesterson RA, Yamamoto H, Taketani Y, Nishiwaki E, Tatsumi S, et al. Structural organization of the human vitamin D receptor chromosomal gene and its promoter. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:1165–1179. doi: 10.1210/mend.11.8.9951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Crofts LA, Hancock MS, Morrison NA, Eisman JA. Multiple promoters direct the tissue-specific expression of novel N-terminal variant human vitamin D receptor gene transcripts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10529–10534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gardiner EM, Esteban LM, Fong C, Allison SJ, Flanagan JL, Kouzmenko AP, et al. Vitamin D receptor B1 and exon 1d: functional and evolutionary analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89-90:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hewison M. Vitamin D and the immune system: new perspectives on an old theme. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010;39:365–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Plum LA, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–955. doi: 10.1038/nrd3318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bikle DD. Vitamin D: an ancient hormone. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20:7–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bouillon R, Okamura WH, Norman AW. Structure-function relationships in the vitamin D endocrine system. Endocr Rev. 1995;16:200–257. doi: 10.1210/edrv-16-2-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nguyen M, Trubert CL, Rizk-Rabin M, Rehan VK, Besancon F, Cayre YE, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and fetal lung maturation: immunogold detection of VDR expression in pneumocytes type II cells and effect on fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89:90–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Menezes RJ, Cheney RT, Husain A, Tretiakova M, Loewen G, Johnson CS, et al. Vitamin D receptor expression in normal, premalignant, and malignant human lung tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1104–1110. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin R, Nagai Y, Sladek R, Bastien Y, Ho J, Petrecca K, et al. Expression profiling in squamous carcinoma cells reveals pleiotropic effects of vitamin D3 analog EB1089 signaling on cell proliferation, differentiation, and immune system regulation. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16:1243–1256. doi: 10.1210/mend.16.6.0874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wood RJ, Tchack L, Angelo G, Pratt RE, Sonna LA. DNA microarray analysis of vitamin D-induced gene expression in a human colon carcinoma cell line. Physiol Genomics. 2004;17:122–129. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00002.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang TT, Tavera-Mendoza LE, Laperriere D, Libby E, MacLeod NB, Nagai Y, et al. Large-scale in silico and microarray-based identification of direct 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target genes. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19:2685–2695. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huhtakangas JA, Olivera CJ, Bishop JE, Zanello LP, Norman AW. The vitamin D receptor is present in caveolae-enriched plasma membranes and binds 1 alpha,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 in vivo and in vitro. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18:2660–2671. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Song X, Bishop JE, Okamura WH, Norman AW. Stimulation of phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in promyelocytic NB4 leukemia cells: a structure-function study. Endocrinology. 1998;139:457–465. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.2.5747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Massheimer V, Boland R, de Boland AR. Rapid 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 stimulation of calcium uptake by rat intestinal cells involves a dihydropyridine-sensitive cAMP-dependent pathway. Cell Signal. 1994;6:299–304. doi: 10.1016/0898-6568(94)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boyan BD, Sylvia VL, Curry D, Chang Z, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Arachidonic acid is an autocoid mediator of the differential action of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and 24,25-(OH)2D3 on growth plate chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1998;176:516–524. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199809)176:3<516::AID-JCP8>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khare S, Bolt MJ, Wali RK, Skarosi SF, Roy HK, Niedziela S, et al. 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 stimulates phospholipase C-gamma in rat colonocytes: role of c-Src in PLC-gamma activation. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1831–1841. doi: 10.1172/JCI119350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rebsamen MC, Sun J, Norman AW, Liao JK. 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces vascular smooth muscle cell migration via activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Circ Res. 2002;91:17–24. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000025269.60668.0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beno DW, Brady LM, Bissonnette M, Davis BH. Protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase are required for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated Egr induction. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:3642–3647. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nemere I, Yoshimoto Y, Norman AW. Calcium transport in perfused duodena from normal chicks: enhancement within fourteen minutes of exposure to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Endocrinology. 1984;115:1476–1483. doi: 10.1210/endo-115-4-1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Norman AW, Okamura WH, Hammond MW, Bishop JE, Dormanen MC, Bouillon R, et al. Comparison of 6-s-cis- and 6-s-trans-locked analogs of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 indicates that the 6-s-cis conformation is preferred for rapid nongenomic biological responses and that neither 6-s-cis-nor 6-s-trans-locked analogs are preferred for genomic biological responses. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:1518–1531. doi: 10.1210/mend.11.10.9993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kajikawa M, Ishida H, Fujimoto S, Mukai E, Nishimura M, Fujita J, et al. An insulinotropic effect of vitamin D analog with increasing intracellular Ca2+ concentration in pancreatic beta-cells through nongenomic signal transduction. Endocrinology. 1999;140:4706–4712. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.10.7025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kadowaki S, Norman AW. Time course study of insulin secretion after 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 administration. Endocrinology. 1985;117:1765–1771. doi: 10.1210/endo-117-5-1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene. 2004;338:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Valdivielso JM, Fernandez E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;371:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Larriba MJ, Bonilla F, Munoz A. The transcription factors Snail1 and Snail2 repress vitamin D receptor during colon cancer progression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;121:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Palmer HG, Larriba MJ, Garcia JM, Ordonez-Moran P, Pena C, Peiro S, et al. The transcription factor SNAIL represses vitamin D receptor expression and responsiveness in human colon cancer. Nat Med. 2004;10:917–919. doi: 10.1038/nm1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pena C, Garcia JM, Silva J, Garcia V, Rodriguez R, Alonso I, et al. E-cadherin and vitamin D receptor regulation by SNAIL and ZEB1 in colon cancer: clinicopathological correlations. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3361–3370. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fang Y, van Meurs JB, d’Alesio A, Jhamai M, Zhao H, Rivadeneira F, et al. Promoter and 3′-untranslated-region haplotypes in the vitamin D receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the Rotterdam study. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:807–823. doi: 10.1086/497438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nejentsev S, Godfrey L, Snook H, Rance H, Nutland S, Walker NM, et al. Comparative high-resolution analysis of linkage disequilibrium and tag single nucleotide polymorphisms between populations in the vitamin D receptor gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1633–1639. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Te Winkel ML, van Beek RD, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Uitterlinden AG, Hop WC, Pieters R, et al. Pharmacogenetic risk factors for altered bone mineral density and body composition in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2010;95:752–759. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.016303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jehan F, Gaucher C, Nguyen TM, Walrant-Debray O, Lahlou N, Sinding C, et al. Vitamin D receptor genotype in hypophosphatemic rickets as a predictor of growth and response to treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4672–4682. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rowland GW, Schwartz GG, John EM, Ingles SA. Calcium intake and prostate cancer among African Americans: effect modification by vitamin D receptor calcium absorption genotype. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 doi: 10.1002/jbmr.505. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Halsall JA, Osborne JE, Pringle JH, Hutchinson PE. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, particularly the novel A-1012G promoter polymorphism, are associated with vitamin D3 responsiveness and non-familial susceptibility in psoriasis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:349–355. doi: 10.1097/01213011-200505000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abrams SA, Griffin IJ, Hawthorne KM, Chen Z, Gunn SK, Wilde M, et al. Vitamin D receptor Fok1 polymorphisms affect calcium absorption, kinetics, and bone mineralization rates during puberty. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:945–953. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ames SK, Ellis KJ, Gunn SK, Copeland KC, Abrams SA. Vitamin D receptor gene Fok1 polymorphism predicts calcium absorption and bone mineral density in children. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:740–746. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.5.740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Elnenaei MO, Chandra R, Mangion T, Moniz C. Genomic and metabolomic patterns segregate with responses to calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:71–79. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510003065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roth DE, Soto G, Arenas F, Bautista CT, Ortiz J, Rodriguez R, et al. Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and response to treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:920–927. doi: 10.1086/423212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sharma V, Fretwell D, Crees Z, Kerege A, Klopper JP. Thyroid cancer resistance to vitamin D receptor activation is associated with 24-hydroxylase levels but not the ff FokI polymorphism. Thyroid. 2010;20:1103–1111. doi: 10.1089/thy.2010.0096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alimirah F, Peng X, Murillo G, Mehta RG. Functional significance of vitamin D receptor FokI polymorphism in human breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dayangac-Erden D, Karaduman A, Erdem-Yurter H. Polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor gene in Turkish familial psoriasis patients. Arch Dermatol Res. 2007;299:487–491. doi: 10.1007/s00403-007-0782-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Andraos C, Koorsen G, Knight JC, Bornman L. Vitamin D receptor gene methylation is associated with ethnicity, tuberculosis, and TaqI polymorphism. Hum Immunol. 2011;72:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morrison NA, George PM, Vaughan T, Tilyard MW, Frampton CM, Gilchrist NL. Vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the success of calcitriol therapy for recurrent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:127–135. doi: 10.1097/01213011-200502000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arabi A, Zahed L, Mahfoud Z, El-Onsi L, Nabulsi M, Maalouf J, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms modulate the skeletal response to vitamin D supplementation in healthy girls. Bone. 2009;45:1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.07.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ryan C, Renfro L, Collins P, Kirby B, Rogers S. Clinical and genetic predictors of response to narrowband ultraviolet B for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:1056–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Palomba S, Orio F, Jr., Russo T, Falbo A, Tolino A, Manguso F, et al. BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the efficacy of antiresorptive treatments in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. A 1-year multicenter, randomized and controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:943–952. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1800-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Creatsa M, Pliatsika P, Kaparos G, Antoniou A, Armeni E, Tsakonas E, et al. The effect of vitamin D receptor BsmI genotype on the response to osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1415–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01557.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lambrinoudaki I, Kaparos G, Armeni E, Alexandrou A, Damaskos C, Logothetis E, et al. BsmI vitamin D receptor’s polymorphism and bone mineral density in men and premenopausal women on long-term antiepileptic therapy. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:93–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hubner RA, Muir KR, Liu JF, Logan RF, Grainge MJ, Houlston RS. Dairy products, polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and colorectal adenoma recurrence. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:586–593. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.D’Alesio A, Garabedian M, Sabatier JP, Guaydier-Souquieres G, Marcelli C, Lemacon A, et al. Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human vitamin D receptor promoter change protein-DNA complex formation and are associated with height and vitamin D status in adolescent girls. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3539–3548. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arai H, Miyamoto KI, Yoshida M, Yamamoto H, Taketani Y, Morita K, et al. The polymorphism in the caudal-related homeodomain protein Cdx-2 binding element in the human vitamin D receptor gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:1256–1264. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yamamoto H, Miyamoto K, Li B, Taketani Y, Kitano M, Inoue Y, et al. The caudal-related homeodomain protein Cdx-2 regulates vitamin D receptor gene expression in the small intestine. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:240–247. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.2.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.International HapMap Consortium The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426:789–796. doi: 10.1038/nature02168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saijo T, Ito M, Takeda E, Huq AH, Naito E, Yokota I, et al. A unique mutation in the vitamin D receptor gene in three Japanese patients with vitamin D-dependent rickets type II: utility of single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis for heterozygous carrier detection. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49:668–673. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jurutka PW, Remus LS, Whitfield GK, Thompson PD, Hsieh JC, Zitzer H, et al. The polymorphic N terminus in human vitamin D receptor isoforms influences transcriptional activity by modulating interaction with transcription factor IIB. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:401–420. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.3.0435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Van EE, Verlinden L, Giulietti A, Ramos-Lopez E, Branisteanu DD, Ferreira GB, et al. The vitamin D receptor gene FokI polymorphism: functional impact on the immune system. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:395–405. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Selvaraj P. Vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, and cathelicidin in the treatment of tuberculosis. Vitam Horm. 2011;86:307–325. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386960-9.00013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES