Skip to main content
The Libyan Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Libyan Journal of Medicine
. 2013 Jun 10;8:10.3402/ljm.v8i0.21137. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v8i0.21137

Frequency and spectrum of Wolcott–Rallison syndrome in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

Abdelhadi M Habeb 1,*
PMCID: PMC3679509  PMID: 23759358

Abstract

Background

Wolcott–Rallison syndrome (WRS) is caused by recessive EIF2AK3 gene mutations and characterized by permanent neonatal diabetes (PNDM), skeletal dysplasia, and recurrent hepatitis. The frequency of this rare syndrome is largely unknown.

Objectives

To define the frequency and spectrum of WRS in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) based on published data.

Methods

The Medline database was searched for published articles on WRS. The number of reported cases from KSA was compared to the total number of WRS cases reported worldwide. The genotype and phenotype of WRS patients from KSA were reviewed.

Results

Ten articles describing 23 WRS patients from 12 Saudi families from 1995 to 2012 were identified. This figure accounts for 27.7% (23/83) of the patients and 22.2% (12/54) of the families with WRS reported worldwide until January 2013. All Saudi patients with WRS presented with PNDM, and they represent 59% of all PNDM cases from WRS. At reporting, 73% of patients experienced recurrent hepatitis, 56.5% had skeletal abnormalities, and 39.1% of them were dead. There was a variation in the phenotype even between affected siblings. Genetic diagnosis was confirmed in all 12 families with no correlation between the genotype and phenotype. Eight of the nine EIF2AK3 mutations were only reported in these families, and one was shared with a patient from Qatar, a neighboring Arab state.

Conclusions

No study on the frequency of WRS has been published. However, the available data indicate that KSA has the largest collection of patients with WRS worldwide, and nine of the identifiable EIF2AK3 mutations appear to be confined to Arabs. Establishing a national or international registry for WRS would provide more reliable data on this rare condition.

Keywords: Wolcott–Rallison syndrome, EIF2AK3 mutations, Saudi Arabia, neonatal diabetes


Wolcott–Rallison syndrome (WRS) is an autosomal recessive condition that was first described in three children in 1972 (1). It is characterized by permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM), skeletal dysplasia, and recurrent hepatitis triggered by viral illnesses and stress (2). Other features such as renal dysfunction, failure to thrive, neutropenia, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, hypothyroidism, recurrent infection, and developmental delay have been reported in some patients (35). The condition has poor prognosis, with most patients dying during childhood mainly due to acute fulminant hepatitis and/or acute renal impairment (25).

In 2000, mutations in the EIF2AK3 gene were identified in a few patients with WRS (5), and since then almost all patients with classical WRS features have EIF2AK3 mutations. The EIF2AK3 gene encodes a transmembrane protein called protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), which is important for the cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The absence of PERK activity reduces the ER's abilities to deal with stress, leading to cell death by apoptosis in many tissues (6, 7). Recently, reports by Feng et al. (8) and Gupta et al. (9) showed that acute ablation of PERK results in reduced cell proliferation with abnormal insulin trafficking and secretion. Studies in EIF2AK3/PERK knockout mouse demonstrated that PERK is required for pancreatic beta cell development during fetal and early neonatal development (7), and that diabetes and skeletal dysplasia are due to loss of PERK expression in pancreatic beta cells (10) and osteoblasts (11).

Data on the epidemiology of WRS are limited, and the latest literature review on the subject suggested that less than 60 WRS cases were reported worldwide (2). However, the condition has been recently found to be the commonest genetic cause of PNDM in consanguineous families (4) and in the Arab population (12). In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the population is mostly Arab, and consanguinity is highly practiced (13); it is therefore expected to be one of the demographic foci for this condition. However, little is known about the frequency or spectrum of WRS in the country. The aim of this article is therefore to define the frequency of WRS in KSA compared to other populations and to describe the genetics and clinical phenotype of WRS in the country based on reported cases in the literature.

Methods

Article collection

The Medline database was searched for articles, including case reports and letters, using the key words ‘Wolcott–Rallison syndrome’, ‘permanent neonatal diabetes’, and ‘EIF2AK3 gene mutations’. The titles and abstracts of the papers were scanned by the author to identify eligible articles according to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The references in selected papers were checked for additional articles. Replication of reported cases was excluded by patients’ demographic data and clinical characteristics, the mutation type, and, if needed, authors’ names and institutions.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Articles were selected if they were written in English, were published before 31 January 2013, and included data on the epidemiology, phenotype, or genotype of WRS subjects of Saudi origin. Studies including Saudi patients with PNDM not caused by WRS or those without clinical and demographic details were excluded.

Data extraction

The genotype, phenotype, and country of origin of published WRS cases were retrieved from the full text of the articles. The following data were collected and described: mutation type, gender, gestational age, birth weight, age at diagnosis, age at reporting or death, clinical phenotype, and prognosis. The total number of families and subjects with WRS from KSA was compared to published cases from other countries and to the total number of reported patients with PNDM from KSA.

Results

The data selection process is shown in Fig. 1. Ten articles (five original reports) published between 1995 and 2012 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the original articles, two papers reported Saudi patients as part of an international WRS cohort (3, 4), one provided data on the frequency and spectrum of WRS in one KSA region (14), and two described studies to define the genetic causes of Saudi subjects with a clinical phenotype of WRS (15, 16). The five case reports (1721) were on patients; most of them had been or were subsequently duplicated elsewhere (Table 1). Seven of the published Saudi patients with WRS were reported in more than one article (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Details of data selection.

Table 1.

Summary of demography, mutations, and phenotype of WRS families reported from KSA until 31 January 2013

Family and patient number References EIF2AK3 mutation: protein (nucleotide) Sex Birth weight (kg) DM onset (weeks) Skeletal dysplasia Recurrent hepatitis Other reported features and prognosis
1.1 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) F 2.4 10 Yes Yes Central hypothyroidism; died at 2 yr
1.2 (4, 14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) F 2.9 8 No Yes None; alive on insulin
1.3 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) M 3.1 6 No Yes None; died at 2 yr with acute hepatitis
2.1 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) F 2.0 16 Yes Yes Developmental delay, short stature, and renal failure; died at 6 yr
2.2 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) M 3.1 21 Yes Yes Short stature, renal dysfunction; died at 3 yr
3.1 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) M 2.34 8 No Yes No other features; died at 6 yr
3.2 (14) V349SfsX3 (c.1044_1057del) M 2.40 8 No Yes No other features; alive on insulin
4.1 (4, 17) N420TfsX14 (c.1259delA M 2.75 3 Yes Yes Short stature; died at 7 yr
4.2 (17) N420TfsX14 (c.1259delA F 3.2 19 No Yes Transient hypothyroidism; alive at 1.1 yr
4.3 (17) N420TfsX14 (c.1259delA M 3.1 4 No Yes Died at 1.1 yr with acute hepatitis
5.1 (17) N420TfsX14 (c.1259delA F 2.4 12 No No Transient hypothyroidism; alive at 3.5 yr
5.2 (17) N420TfsX14 (c.1259delA F 2.7 8 Yes Yes Ectopic left kidney; depressed nasal; bridge; short neck, upward slanting of palpebral fissures; WPW syndrome; alive at 2 yr on insulin
6.1 (4) S469X(c.1406C>G) F 2.0 4 Yes Yes Primary hypothyroidism at 1.3 yr (TSH:146.6 mU/L, FT4<5 pmol/L), hepatomegaly; alive at 2 yr
7.1 (4) R1064X (c.3190C>T) M 2.8 20 Yes Yes Congenital nystagmus, microcephaly, neutropenia, and anemia at 1 yr; alive at 4 yr
8.1 (4) A159PfsX41 (c.475delG) M 3.3 6 Yes Yes Neutropenia; alive at 3 yr
9.1 (15, 16, 18) E524X (1563delGAAA) M 1.1 at 28 wks 1 Yes No Proptosis, high arched palate, downward slanting of palpebral fissure, hydrocephalus, blue sclera, neurodevelopmental delay, recurrent hypoglycemia, osteopenia, and spontaneous fracture; died at 2 yr.
9.2 (15) Not tested M 1.5 at 30 wks 4 No No Alive at 5 months
10.1 (16, 18) IVS14+1G/A (sp996X1020 M 2.5 8 Yes No Severe neurodevelopmental delay, recurrent hypoglycemia; died of renal failure at 4 yr
10.2 (16) Not tested M NR 2 No No Alive at 9 yr
11.1 (3, 19, 20) W164X M 2.2 6 Yes Yes Hepatomegaly, developmental delay, renal dysfunction; alive at 6 yr
11.2 (3) W164X F NR 8 NR NR Patient was too young at the time of reporting to show other features; alive
12.1 (3, 21) Fs1025X1048 F 1.7 8 Yes Yes Central hypothyroidism, hepatomegaly, depressed nasal bridge, developmental delay; alive at 6 yr
12.2 (3, 21) Fs1025X1048 M 1.1 8 Yes Yes Central hypothyroidism, mild pancreatic hypoplasia on CT; died at 5 yr

NR, not reported.

Frequency of WRS

In total, 23 children (14 boys) with WRS from 12 Saudi families were identified (3, 4, 1421). This number accounts for 27.7% (23/83) of patients and 22.2% (12/54) of families with WRS reported worldwide until 31 January 2013 (1, 35, 1440). A comparison between the number of patients and families with WRS from KSA and those from other countries is illustrated in Fig. 2. The 23 children with WRS represent 58.9% of the 39 patients with PNDM reported from KSA to date (3, 4, 1421, 4146).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The number of patients and families with WRS per country of origin or residency reported until January 2013. UAE=United Arab Emirates; UK=United Kingdom; USA=United States of America. The numbers between brackets indicate the references.

Clinical phenotype

The clinical characteristics of the 23 Saudi patients are summarized in Table 1. All children except one (8.1) were the product of consanguineous marriages, and 60% of them were males. Two siblings (9.1 and 9.2) were born preterm and the rest were born at term, with a mean birth weight of 2.52 kg. PNDM was the presenting feature in all patients with a median age of onset at 15 weeks. There was a variation in the frequency of other features even between affected siblings of the same gender (Table 1). At the time of reporting, 39.1% (9/23) of the patients were dead, and the longest surviving patient was 9 years old. Recurrent hepatitis was experienced in 73.9% (17/23) of patients, and skeletal dysplasia was diagnosed in 56.5% (13/23) of them. Thyroid dysfunction was documented in 26% (6/23) of patients: one patient developed primary hypothyroidism in the first year of life, and the other five had picture suggestive of central hypothyroidism. Impaired renal function was reported in only three subjects, and neutropenia was observed in two patients from different families. Three children were reported to have growth failure; however, exocrine pancreatic function was not tested in any of them.

Genotype

Genetic diagnosis of WRS was confirmed in all 12 Saudi families (Table 1), and their affected members were homozygous for nine different EIF2AK3 mutations spreading through the PERK protein and leading to truncated proteins (4 nonsense, 4 frameshift, and one deletion at exon 14/intron boundaries of the EIF2AK3 gene). Of these mutations, eight were confined to these families, and one nonsense mutation (E523X) was also reported in a child from Qatar (4). Three families from the same tribe shared the same frameshift V349SfsX3 mutation, and two unrelated families have an identical frameshift N420TfsX14 mutation. No missense mutations were identified, and there was no correlation between the genotype and phenotype.

Discussion

This article provides comparative data on the frequency of WRS between different countries and reviews the genotype and phenotype of WRS patients reported from KSA.

Since the latest literature review on WRS by Julier and Nicolino in 2010 (2), 8 families (14 patients) from five countries have been reported (14, 17, 2326), making a total number of 54 families (83 patients) reported with this condition worldwide until January 2013. The published data show a variation in the number of reported families between different countries, with more cases from populations where consanguinity is part of the culture such as the Arab states and Turkey (Fig. 1). This variation may be related to different factors, such as the population size, consanguinity rate, and allele frequency. It could also reflect the level of recognition of WRS and publication interest among clinicians between different countries.

Strikingly, 22.2% of these families were from KSA, which has the largest collection of patients with WRS reported for a single country, suggesting that KSA is a hotspot for this condition. The most likely explanation for the higher frequency of WRS in KSA compared to other countries is the combination of a large population and a high consanguinity rate of 56% (13). All patients except one were the product of consanguineous marriages, and the condition is the commonest cause of PNDM in consanguineous families (4). The 23 WRS patients represent almost 60% of the reported patients with PNDM from KSA (2, 3, 1421, 4146). This finding is in line with recent reports that showed that WRS is the commonest cause of PNDM in northwest KSA (14) and in the Arab population (12). It is expected that not all cases with WRS in KSA were reported, and it is possible that some patients with this condition deceased before the diagnosis was made. Given the high birth rate and consanguinity in KSA, the author suspects that the reported number of WRS cases is probably underestimating the frequency of this condition in the country. There is no doubt that launching a national survey and establishing a registry for NDM and WRS in KSA would raise the awareness of the condition and provide more accurate data on the epidemiology of WRS and other forms of NDM.

All WRS patients from KSA presented with PNDM; however, there was a variation in the onset, nature, and severity of other features even between affected siblings of the same gender (Table 1). This phenomenon has been reported in some WRS families from other countries (3, 4) and has been attributed to various factors, such as the presence of other modified genes, variable expression of the EIF2AK3 gene, epigenetic factors, and variation in management protocols. However, it is also possible that some of these patients were still too young to show some features, such as skeletal dysplasia and failure to thrive, at the time of reporting, or they were not completely assessed for less common features of WRS. Of note, neurodevelopmental functions were not formally assessed in most Saudi subjects, and none of them had their stool elastase measured to diagnose exocrine pancreatic dysfunction.

Around 40% of children from KSA were dead at the time of reporting compared to 70% in the 10 reported patients from Turkey (3, 4, 23, 27), which has the second largest number of reported cases. Recurrent hepatitis triggered by viral infection was reported in more than 70% of Saudi patients, and acute fulminant hepatitis was the main cause of death in all deceased patients from KSA. Recent attempts to reduce ER stress through different mechanisms are promising (47, 48); however, it is important to ensure that families of affected children recognize early symptoms of liver dysfunction and that patients with WRS have a clear plan prepared to avoid delay in starting the management of acute hepatic failure. Liver transplantation was successfully used in one patient with acute fulminant hepatitis and PNDM from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in whom the diagnosis of WRS was later confirmed at the molecular level (4). Interestingly, his long-term diabetes control has improved following the transplantation (A. Deeb, personal communication). However, no patient from KSA was offered this therapy, possibly due to the short life expectancy of these children and the lack of international experience with liver transplantation in the condition. Given the high mortality and morbidity of the condition, the author suggests that patients with WRS should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (consisting of an endocrinologist, a hepatologist, a geneticist, and orthopedic surgeons) and believes that developing guidelines through a national consortium would improve the prognosis of these children.

In the reported Saudi children with WRS, five have thyroid function consistent with central hypothyroidism (Table 1). However, in two patients, the changes were transient in keeping with euthyroid sickness (ES), while in the remaining three patients the thyroid function tests were not repeated. The author supports the notion by Ozbek et al. (27) and Al-Shawi et al. (17) that thyroid dysfunction is a reflection of ES rather than a feature of WRS. Two patients from separate families (5.2 and 9.1) were described as having facial dysmorphism, which has been reported only in WRS cases from KSA; however, it was not clear whether chromosomal karyotyping was performed to exclude other conditions associated with these features. A long-term follow-up study would provide more insight into the clinical phenotype and prognosis of WRS.

The molecular diagnosis of WRS was confirmed in all reported cases from KSA, with no correlation between the phenotype and genotype in the 12 Saudi families as reported in most families with WRS (3, 4, 27). Three families from the same tribe shared the same frameshift mutation (V349SfsX3), and two unrelated families have the same N420TfsX mutation, indicating a founder effect or mutation hotspot. Eight of the nine EIF2AK3 mutations were identified in only these Saudi families; however, one mutation (E523) was also reported in a child from Qatar (4, 38). The fact that Qatar is a neighboring Arab state raises the possibility of a founder effect. It appears that these nine mutations are confined to Arab populations; however, a large study would confirm this possibility.

Of the EIF2AK3 mutations reported to date, four appeared to be associated with a specific phenotype: a delayed age of onset for diabetes was reported with the N656 and I650 mutations (3, 4, 31), whereas milder courses with prolonged survivals of 32 years and 35 years were reported with the F593 and L646 mutations, respectively (3, 4, 29). Interestingly, all of them were missense mutations located closer to each other on the first kinase domain of PERK protein residue. However, no missense mutations were identified in the Saudi families, which could explain the early onset of diabetes and shorter survival age in all KSA patients. Neutropenia is another feature thought to be associated with certain mutations (2, 3, 27). However, it was reported in only two of three affected males from a UAE family with the W430X mutation, and it was transient in a single affected family member with the K150RfsX2 mutation in the Rubio-Cabizas series (4). Out of the nine reported mutations from KSA, neutropenia was reported with only the R1064X and A159PfsX41 mutations; however, these mutations are not close to each other on the PERK protein, and each family has only one affected boy. It is therefore difficult to conclude whether certain EIF2AK3 mutations are associated with neutropenia, at least in Saudi families with WRS.

The diagnosis of WRS is usually made on the combination of the typical phenotype and confirmed by genetic testing. However, Rubio-Cabizas et al. reported three probands with apparent isolated PNDM in whom the molecular diagnosis was made before the appearance of other clinical features. Of note, one of the Saudi patients (2.1) has isolated PNDM, and the diagnosis of WRS was made only by genetic testing at 3.5 year olds following the presentation of her younger sister (17). Given the high morbidity, high mortality, and frequency of WRS in KSA, facilities for early genetic testing should be made readily available for all patients with PNDM, and all patients with PNDM from KSA and from other states where consanguinity is highly practiced should be tested for EIF2AK3 mutations regardless of their phenotype. Reducing consanguinity is a challenge in some cultures such as KSA; however, antenatal diagnosis with termination of pregnancy and pregestational diagnosis, which allow for the selection of unaffected zygotes, can be offered, particularly for families with more than one affected child.

Conclusions

Data on the frequency of WRS are sparse, and information on this condition in KSA is limited to a few case reports or as part of international series. However, the available data show that KSA has the highest reported cases of WRS worldwide, and the condition is the commonest cause of PNDM in the country. A national and international registry of WRS and PNDM based on regular surveys would raise awareness of the condition, provide accurate data, and help in clinical management. It is also important that facilities for genetic testing for WRS should be available for clinicians in order to confirm the diagnosis and provide families with proper genetic counseling.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Asma Deeb and Professor Ibrahim Al Alwan for their critical reading of this article.

Conflict of interest and funding

The author has not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.

References

  • 1.Wolcott CD, Rallison MV. Infancy-onset diabetes mellitus and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. J Pediatr. 1972;80:292–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(72)80596-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Julier C, Nicolino M. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:29. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Senee V, Vattem KM, Delepine M, Rainbow LA, Haton C, Lecoq A, et al. Wolcott_Rallison syndrome: clinical, genetic, and functional study of EIF2AK3 mutations and suggestion of genetic heterogeneity. Diabetes. 2004;53:1876–83. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.7.1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rubio-Cabezas O, Patch AM, Minton JA, Flanagan SE, Edghill EL, Hussain K, et al. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome is the most common genetic cause of permanent neonatal diabetes in consanguineous families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:4162–70. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delepine M, Nicolino M, Barrett T, Golamaully M, Lathrop GM, Julier C. EIF2AK3, encoding translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3, is mutated in patients with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;25:406–9. doi: 10.1038/78085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harding HP, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Jungries R, Chung P, Plesken H, et al. Diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in perk –/– mice reveals a role for translational control in secretory cell survival. Mol Cell. 2001;7:1153–63. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00264-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang P, McGrath B, Li S, Frank A, Zambito F, Reinert J, et al. The PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha kinase is required for the development of the skeletal system, postnatal growth, and the function and viability of the pancreas. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:3864–74. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3864-3874.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feng D, Wei J, Gupta S, McGrath BC, Cavener DR. Acute ablation of PERK results in ER dysfunctions followed by reduced insulin secretion and cell proliferation. BMC Cell Biol. 2009;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-10-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gupta S, McGrath B, Cavener DR. PERK (EIF2AK3) regulates proinsulin trafficking and quality control in the secretory pathway. Diabetes. 2010;59:1937–47. doi: 10.2337/db09-1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iida K, Li Y, McGrath BC, Frank A, Cavener DR. PERK eIF2 alpha kinase is required to regulate the viability of the exocrine pancreas in mice. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wei J, Sheng X, Feng D, McGrath B, Cavener DR. PERK is essential for neonatal skeletal development to regulate osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2008;217:693. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Habeb AM, Flanagan S, Deeb A, Al-Alwan I, Alawneh H, Balafrej AA, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes: different aetiology in Arabs compared with Europeans. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:721–3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El-Mouzan MI, Al-Salloum AA, Al-Herbish AS, Qurachi MM, Al-Omar AA. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28(12):1881–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Habeb AM, Al-Magamsi MSF, Eid I, Ali MI, Hattersley AT, Hussain K, et al. Incidence, genetics and clinical phenotype of permanent neonatal diabetes in northwest Saudi Arabia. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(6):499–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bonthron DT, Dunlop N, Barr DG, El Sanousi AA, Al-Gazali LI. Organisation of the human PAX4 gene and its exclusion as a candidate for the Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. J Med Genet. 1998;35:288–92. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.4.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brickwood S, Bonthron DT, Al-Gazali LI, Piper K, Hearn T, Wilson DI, et al. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome: pathogenic insights into neonatal diabetes from new mutation and expression studies of EIF2AK3. J Med Genet. 2003;40:685–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.9.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.AL-Shawi M, Al-Mutair A, Ellard S, Habeb AM. Variable phenotype in 5 patients with WRS due to the same mutation. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;20:1–4. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2012-0071. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Gazali LI, Makia S, Azzam A, Hall CM. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol. 1995;4:227–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdelrahman S, Bin-Abbas B, Al-Ashwal A. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome in a Saudi infant. Curr Pediatr Res. 2000;1:51–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bin-Abbas B, Shabib S, Hainau B, Al-Ashwal A. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome: clinical, radiological and histological findings in a Saudi child. Ann Saudi Med. 2001;21:73–4. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2001.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bin-Abbas B, Al-Mulhim A, Al-Ashwal A. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome in two siblings with isolated central hypothyroidism. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111:187–90. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marafie MJ, Redha MA, Al-Naggar RL. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome in a Bedouin boy. Ann Saudi Med. 2004;24:476–9. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2004.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mihci E, Türkkahraman D, Ellard S, Akçurin S, Bircan I. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome due to a novel mutation (R491X) in EIF2AK3 gene. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012;4(2):101–3. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reis AF, Kannengiesser C, Jennane F, Manna TD, Cheurfa N, Oudin C, et al. Two novel mutations in the EIF2AK3 gene in children with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12(3 Pt1):187–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feng DR, Meng Y, Zhao SM, Shi HP, Wang WC, Huang SZ. Two novel EIF2AK3 mutations in a Chinese boy with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2011;49(4):301–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sang Y, Liu M, Yang W, Yan J, Chengzhu, Ni G. A novel EIF2AK3 mutation leading to Wolcott–Rallison syndrome in a Chinese child. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2011;24(3–4):181–4. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2011.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ozbek MN, Senée V, Aydemir S. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome due to the same mutation (W522X) in EIF2AK3 in two unrelated families and review of the literature. Pediatr Diabetes. 2010;11:279–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goumy O, Maroteux P, Stanescu V, Stanescu R, Labbe A, Menut G. Syndrome de transmission recessive autosomeique anociant un diabete congenital et desdesordes de la croissance des epiphyses. Arch Franc Pediatr. 1980;37:323–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stoss H, Pesch HJ, Pontz B, Otten A, Spranger J. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome: diabetes mellitus and spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia. Eur J Pediatr. 1982;138:120–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00441137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Biason-Lauber A, Lang-Muritano M, Vaccaro T, Schoenle EJ. Loss of kinase activity in a patient with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the EIF2AK3 gene. Diabetes. 2002;51:2301–5. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Castelnau P, Le Merrer M, Diatloff-Zito C, Marquis E, Tete MJ, Robert JJ. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome: a case with endocrine and exocrine pancreatic deficiency and pancreatic hypotrophy. Eur J Pediatr. 2000;159:631–3. doi: 10.1007/pl00008394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Wit MC, de Coo IF, Julier C. Microcephaly and simplified gyral pattern of the brain associated with early onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Neurogenetics. 2006;7:259–63. doi: 10.1007/s10048-006-0061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Durocher F, Faure R, Labrie Y, Pelletier L, Bouchard I, Laframboise R. A novel mutation in the EIF2AK3 gene with variable expressivity in two patients with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Clin Genet. 2006;70:34–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Iyer S, Korada M, Rainbow L, Kirk J, Brown RM, Shaw N, et al. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome: a clinical and genetic study of three children, novel mutation in EIF2AK3 and a review of the literature. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:1195–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thornton CM, Carson DJ, Stewart FJ. Autopsy findings in the Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1997;17(3):487–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stewart FJ, Carson DJ, Thomas PS, Humphreys M, Thornton C, Nevin NC. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome associated with congenital malformations and a mosaic deletion 15q 11–12. Clin Genet. 1996;49(3):152–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1996.tb03275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sovik O, Njolstad PR, Jellum E, Molven A. Wolcott–Rallison syndrome with 3-hydroxydicarboxylic aciduria and lethal outcome. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31(Suppl 2):S293–7. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0866-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Engelmann G, Meyburg J, Shahbek N, Al-Ali M, Hairetis MH, Baker AJ, et al. Recurrent acute liver failure and mitochondriopathy in a case of Wolcott–Rallison syndrome. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31(4):540–6. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0867-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stanik J, Gasperikova D, Paskova M, Barak L, Javorkova J, Jancova E, et al. Prevalence of permanent neonatal diabetes in Slovakia and successful replacement of insulin with sulfonylurea therapy in KCNJ11 and ABCC8 mutation carriers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1276–82. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grulich-Henn J, Wagner V, Thon A, Schober E, Marg W, Kapellen TM, et al. Entities and frequency of neonatal diabetes: data from the diabetes documentation and quality management system (DPV) Diabet Med. 2010;27:709–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Taha D, Bardise J, Hegab A, Bonnefond A, Marchand M, Drunat S, et al. Neonatal diabetes mellitus because of pancreatic agenesis with dysmorphic features and recurrent bacterial infections. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9:240–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taha D, Barbar M, Kanaan H, Williamson Balfe J. Neonatal diabetes mellitus, congenital hypothyroidism, hepatic fibrosis, polycystic kidneys, and congenital glaucoma: a new autosomal recessive syndrome? Am J Med Genet A. 2003;122A(3):269–73. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Senée V, Chelala C, Duchatelet S, Feng D, Blanc H, Cossec JC, et al. Mutations in GLIS3 are responsible for a rare syndrome with neonatal diabetes mellitus and congenital hypothyroidism. Nat Genet. 2006;38(6):682–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Attia N, Zahrani A, Saif R, Kattan HA, Sakati N, Al Ashwal A, et al. Different faces of non-autoimmune diabetes of infancy. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(1):95–7. doi: 10.1080/08035259850157958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mathew PM, Hann RW, Hamdan JA. Neonatal diabetes mellitus in first cousins. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1988;27(5):247–51. doi: 10.1177/000992288802700508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Al-Mahdi M, Al Mutair A, Al Balwi M, Hussain K. Successful transfer from insulin to oral sulfonylurea in a 3-year-old girl with a mutation in the KCNJ11 gene. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30(2):162–4. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.60526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell. 2010;140:900–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cunha DA, Ladriere L, Ortis F, Igoillo-Esteve M, Gurzov EN, Lupi R, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists protect pancreatic -cells from lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress through upregulation of BiP and JunB. Diabetes. 2009;58:2851–62. doi: 10.2337/db09-0685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Libyan Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES