Abstract
Background
Clinical laboratories in Botswana have relied entirely on the reference intervals for normal immunohaematological values provided by manufacturers’ kits and textbooks.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the means, medians, 2.5th and 97.5th percentile reference intervals, for normal immunohaematological values in healthy adults in Botswana.
Method
A total of 261 healthy participants comprising 126 men (48%) and 135 (52%) women were enrolled in the southern part of Botswana, and immunological and haematological laboratory parameters were measured.
Results
The mean age was 28.8 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 27.7–29.8) years, with a median of 27 years and a range 18–66 years. The mean haemoglobin level was significantly lower for women (12.4 g/dL; 95% CI 12.1% – 12.7%) than men (15.1 g/dL; 95% CI 14.9% – 15.3%). The women’s haemoglobin reference values (9.0 g/dL – 15.0 g/dL) levels were lower than observed in predominantly White populations (12.0 g/dL – 16.0 g/dL), but comparable with regional consensus reference intervals (9.5 g/dL – 15.8 g/dL) recently defined for East and Southern Africa.
Conclusion
The established values provide an important tool for patient management and could influence decisions on inclusion of participants and adverse events in clinical trials conducted locally.
Introduction
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) constitutes a major public health problem in Botswana with a prevalence of 17.6%1 in the general population and 31.8% amongst pregnant woman.2,3 Botswana is one of the countries in Africa that has led a very high response to the epidemic through a range of multilevel interventions, including the widespread access to antiretrovirals (ARVs),4,5 and has built capacity to conduct international prevention, treatment and vaccine trials.6 A valid scientific safety evaluation of ARVs and HIV vaccines relies on the availability of locally defined reference values for parameters of clinical interest.7
Reference intervals are essential for monitoring patho-physiological changes after infection or disease states, or following the administration of drugs in therapeutic or clinical interventions and vaccine studies. Several multicenter trials, including Phase I and/or Phase II vaccine studies and global use of ARVs, have increased the need for regional and locally established reference values.8 Reference values vary considerably in different populations, geographical regions, climate, race and dietary habits.9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Reference intervals studies conducted in African countries have shown differences within populations and sometimes within sub-groups, and marked differences with values from White populations.8,13,16,17,18 These studies have also observed significant differences with values from developed countries, in haematologic parameters such as haemoglobin and absolute neutrophil, which are normally used for toxicity grading in clinical trials, and consequently have implications in patient management and the conduct of clinical trials.18,19,20,21 A significant number of potential African volunteers are excluded from participating in vaccine trials because screening, enrollment and follow-up monitoring is mostly based on values derived from predominantly White populations. A study in Uganda19 documented an exclusion rate of as high as 69% of vaccine clinical trial participants because of haematologic abnormalities, 83% of whom could have been included in the studies if local reference ranges were used. Kibiya et al.8 observed that the lower limit of neutrophil counts and haemoglobin reference ranges qualify to be graded as moderate and severe adverse events, respectively, according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) toxicity grading table.22
Determination of the CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts play a pivotal role on the initiation and monitoring of patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); hence the urgent need for establishing CD4+ lymphocytes reference intervals for local populations. Some studies have observed that Black people and Afro–Caribbean people have lower total white cell counts, and neutrophil and platelet counts, than White people.9,23,24 Immunohaematological reference values for a healthy Botswanan population have never been established formally, whereas in many African countries, it is common practice to use reference values established in predominantly White populations, which may not be representative of the Botswanan population (which comprises mostly Black people). In order to conduct investigation drug (IND) and vaccine trials successfully, an assessment of the local reference intervals is required.25,26,27 The aim of this study was to establish the immunohaematological reference values in healthy adults in Botswana following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (formerly NCCLS) guidelines28 in order to improve patient care, the participation of individuals in clinical trials and the evaluation of adverse events.
Materials and methods
Study design, setting and population
A cross sectional study was conducted amongst healthy adult volunteers that were recruited at the voluntary counselling and testing center (VCT) known as Tebelopele (a Setswana name that means ‘foresight’) from around Gaborone, the capital city of Botswana. Potential volunteers who tested HIV-negative in a parallel testing algorithm that used Determine HIV-1/2 (Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA) and UniGold HIV (Trinity Biotech, Ireland) rapid test kits, were recruited into the study. The rapid HIV results were confirmed in the laboratory by using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as per national guidelines.
Study procedures
Potential apparently healthy HIV-negative volunteers who consented to participate in the study were included. A brief screening questionnaire was administered by experienced study nurses. The questionnaire was designed using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines28 (formerly NCCLS) and the following categories were excluded:
pregnant
breastfeeding
patients who had been inpatients in a hospital or who had been subjectively ill during the last month
patients receiving medical treatment
patients who had a recent or recurrent infection, including HIV and malaria
patients who had smoked in the hour before blood was drawn
patients who had donated blood in the preceding month.
Participants had access to their HIV-testing results through voluntary counselling and testing protocol, and obtained all other results through a registered physician for review and referral to appropriate care. Participants with underlying clinical conditions were excluded from the analysis as well.
Laboratory procedures
Blood collection and HIV serology
Approximately 15 mL whole blood was collected from the cubital vein with a vacutainer system in K3EDTA. Samples were analysed on the day of collection. HIV status was further confirmed in plasma from the samples by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays Vironostika HIV Uniform II plus O (BioMérieux France, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and Murex HIV-1.2.O Murex (Biotech, Dartford, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions. A parallel algorithm was applied and the tests were performed at the Botswana Harvard HIV Reference Laboratory, following national guidelines that included confirmation with Western Blot or DNA PCR for all discordant results.
Flow cytometric analysis
T-lymphocyte subsets were analysed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, California) by using a four-colour immunofluorescence reagent (BD MultiTEST CD3 fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]/CD8, phycoerythrin [PE]/CD45, peridinin chlorophyll protein [PerCP]/CD4, allophycocyanin [APC]), and TruCOUNT tubes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The list-mode data was acquired and analysed with MultiSET software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems). The instrument used was validated prior to use and it was monitored daily with TRUcount controls materials; it was also enrolled in an external quality assurance scheme by the United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Scheme (UKNEQAS). Analysis was conducted by trained and competent personnel.
Haematological analysis
Haematology parameters were determined from whole blood by using the Sysmex XE-2100 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The XE-2100 is capable of measuring 32 parameters, including the white blood cell (WBC) 5-part differential into lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils and basophils. It also provides a 14-parameter haemogram, as well as an integral reticulocyte analysis that includes an immature reticulocyte fraction, a nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) count and calculated parameters. These calculated parameters are, the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (fL), the corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) (pg), the mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (g/dL), and the RBC distribution width by standard deviation (RDW-SD) (fL). The accuracy and precision of the instrument was monitored daily by using commercial quality control materials, as well as quarterly through enrollment in an external quality assurance scheme by the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Trained and competent personnel performed the analysis.
Ethical considerations
The study was approved by the Health Research and Development Committee (HRDC) of the Ministry of Health in Botswana. Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to their enrollment. Those people found to be HIV-positive were excluded from the study, and referred for HIV care and treatment clinics for further management. CD4 and haematology results that were obtained, were offered free of charge as per the Botswanan guidelines.
Statistical analysis
Reference intervals were calculated according to the CLSI guidelines document C28-A2 28 by applying non-parametric methods. The medians were calculated and reference values were determined as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, respectively, of the distribution of reference values. The mean, median, and standard deviation values were calculated for each immunohaematological parameter. We used confidence ratio, which is the ratio of (average confidence interval width) to (reference interval), as described by Rhoads,29 to evaluate the impact of the sample size. CLSI recommends a minimum of 120 healthy patients per group. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any statistically differences between laboratory values for men and women. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were carried out with EP Evaluator Release 8 (David G. Rhoads and Associates, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA) and Stata 11.0 (SataCorp, College Park, Texas, USA).
Results
Screening and enrollment started in May 2008 and ended in June 2008. A total of 294 individuals were screened: 145 men (49%) and 149 women (51%). A total of 33 (11.2%) of screened volunteers were excluded, following enrollment based on defined exclusion criteria. The remaining 261 participants’ samples were included in the study, and comprised 135 women (51%) and 126 men (49%). The mean age was 28.8 (95% CI, 27.7–29.8) years, with a median of 27 and a range 18–66 years.
In our results (Table 1 and Table 2) we show the means, medians and 95th percentile reference values, according to gender, for CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes absolute values and percentages. The median CD4 cell count in the women (924 cells/mm3) was significant higher than in the men (744 cells/mm3), with p < 0.05. The calculated combined reference intervals for CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes were 261 cells/mm3 – 1667 cells/mm3 and 261 cells/mm3 – 1538 cells/mm3 for men, and 268 cells/mm3 – 1667 cells/mm3 for women (Table 1). The reference intervals for CD8+ T-lymphocytes (Table 2) were comparable to those obtained from a blood donor population. The study furthermore shows that the CD4% and CD8% reference intervals for women were 27–63, for men 27–60, and for both sexes 27–63 (Table 3). The CD8% reference intervals were 12–46 for women, 11–45 for men, and 11–46 for both sexes. The absolute CD4 and CD8 values for Botswana were lower than for most African countries (Table 4).
TABLE 1.
CD4+ cell counts for healthy HIV-negative adults in Botswana.
| Source | Sex | N | CD4+ cell counts (cells/mm3) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | s.d. | 95% CI | Median | Range | 2.5th–97.5th percentile | |||
| General population | Combined | 261 | 859 | 284 | 824–894 | 827 | 261–1667 | 374–1527 |
| Female | 135 | 949 | 288 | 900–998 | 924* | 268–1667 | 467–1603 | |
| Male | 126 | 762 | 247 | 719–805 | 744* | 261–1538 | 333–1275 | |
| Blood donors | Combined | 437 | 759 | 245 | 736–782 | 726 | 171–1652 | 366–1318 |
| Female | 143 | 827 | 245 | 787–868 | 786 | 344–1558 | 438–1328 | |
| Male | 294 | 725 | 238 | 698–753 | 698 | 171–1652 | 366–1252 | |
Source: Blood donor data quoted from Bussmann H, Wester CW, Masupu KV, et al. Low CD4+ T-lymphocyte values in HIV-negative adults in Botswana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:930–935. PMid:15358655, PMCid:515279
N, Number of subjects; CI, confidence interval; s.d., standard deviation.
p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test used to calculate p-values).
TABLE 2.
CD8+ cells counts for healthy HIV-negative adults in Botswana.
| Source | Sex | N | CD8+ cell counts (cells/mm3) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | s.d. | 95% CI | Median | Range | 2.5th–97.5th percentile | |||
| General population | Combined | 261 | 540 | 210 | 514–566 | 522 | 173–1166 | 225–1053 |
| Female | 135 | 557 | 211 | 521–593 | 546* | 184–1093 | 234–1057 | |
| Male | 126 | 522 | 208 | 486–558 | 497* | 173–1166 | 180–1058 | |
| Blood donors | Combined | 437 | 509 | 205 | 490–528 | 488 | 90–1573 | 190–1014 |
| Female | 143 | 523 | 203 | 490–557 | 494 | 155–1198 | 228–1062 | |
| Male | 294 | 502 | 205 | 479–526 | 485 | 90–1573 | 178–994 | |
Source: Blood donor data quoted from Bussmann H, Wester CW, Masupu KV, et al. Low CD4+ T-lymphocyte values in HIV-negative adults in Botswana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:930–935. PMid:15358655, PMCid:515279
N, Number of subjects; CI, confidence interval; s.d., standard deviation.
p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test used to calculate p-values).
TABLE 3.
CD4% and CD8% cells counts for healthy HIV-negative adults in Botswana.
| Cell type | Sex | N | Cell counts (cells/mm3) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | s.d. | 95% CI | Median | Range | 2.5th–97.5th percentile | |||
| CD4 | Combined | 261 | 43 | 6.7 | 42–44 | 43 | 27–63 | 29–57 |
| Female | 135 | 45 | 6.3 | 44–46 | 45* | 27–63 | 32–57 | |
| Male | 126 | 41 | 6.8 | 40–42 | 41* | 27–60 | 28–34 | |
| CD8 | Combined | 261 | 27 | 6.6 | 26–28 | 27 | 11–46 | 16–41 |
| Female | 135 | 26 | 6.1 | 25–27 | 26** | 12–46 | 16–40 | |
| Male | 126 | 28 | 7 | 27–29 | 29** | 11–45 | 16–43 | |
N, Number of subjects; CI, confidence interval; s.d., standard deviation.
p < 0.001
p = 0.011 (Mann-Whitney U test used to calculate p-values).
TABLE 4.
Comparison of ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ and absolute CD4+, CD8+ and lymphocyte counts between different populations.
| Source population | Sample size (n) | Reference | Absolute CD4+ |
Absolute CD8+ |
Absolute Lymphocyte Count |
CD4 / CD8 T-cell ratio |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean value | Reference intervals | Mean value | Reference intervals | Mean value | Reference intervals | Mean value | Reference intervals | |||
| Botswanan | 260 | Current study | 859 | 261–1667 | 540 | 173–1166 | - | - | 1.65 | 0.79–2.88 |
| Botswanan (Blood donors) | 437 | 23 | 759 | 171–1652 | 509 | 90–1573 | - | - | 1.63 | 0.40–55.83 |
| Eastern and Southern African | 2105 | 18 | - | 457–1628 | - | 230–1178 | - | 1200–3700 | - | - |
| Ethiopian | 142 | 16 | 775 | 366–1235 | 747 | 311–1618 | 1857 | 1032–3432 | 1.20 | 0.40–2.40 |
| Ugandan | 183 | 13 | 1256 | 559-2333 | 668 | 253–1396 | 2666 | 1453–4448 | 2.16 | 0.68–4.40 |
| US-based Comparison interval | - | 30 | 30 | 518–1981 | - | 270–1335 | - | 1000–4800 | - | - |
Note: Please see the full reference list of the article, Mine M, Moyo S, Stevens P, et al. Immunohaematological reference values for HIV-negative healthy adults in Botswana. Afr J Lab Med. 2011;1(1), Art. #5, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.5, for more information.
Our research shows the reference intervals for the haematological parameters (mean; mean s.d; and 95% CI for mean, median, range 2.5th to 97.5th percentile) partitioned by gender (Table 5 and Table 6). The red blood cell (RBC) parameters (median haemoglobin, haematocrit, and RBC) and WBC were statistically different according to gender (p < 0.05). There were; however, no gender-specific differences observed for some white blood cell (WBC) subsets (neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, reticulocytes and basophils), except for monocytes (p = 0.0089). Our research also shows haematological reference intervals from this study and those from certain African countries14,16,18,19 and non-African populations (Table 7).30 The haemoglobin reference intervals were generally higher than in East Africa, but lower than those from Ethiopia and US-based comparison populations.
TABLE 5.
Means, medians and 95th percentile reference intervals for haematological parameters for 261 HIV-negative adults in Botswana.
| Subject group | Parameter | WBC count (109/L) | RBC count (109/L) | Haemoglobin (g/dL) | Haematocrit (%) | Platelet count (109/L) | Mean Cellular Volume (fL) | Mean Cell Haemoglobin (pg) | Mean Cell Haemoglobin Concentration (g/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Mean | 5.1 | 5.20 | 15.12 | 43.38 | 277.80 | 83.68 | 29.25 | 34.9 |
| s.d. | 1.54 | 0.39 | 0.99 | 2.59 | 60.00 | 4.03 | 1.84 | 1.03 | |
| Median | 4.84 | 5.18 | 15.3 | 43.3 | 277.5 | 84 | 29.5 | 35 | |
| Reference range | 2.9–7.9 | 4.20–6.30 | 11.90–17.10 | 36.10–49.30 | 141–494 | 73.80–95.60 | 23.40–33.30 | 31.80–37.60 | |
| Female | Mean | 5.9 | 4.44 | 12.54 | 36.69 | 277.80 | 82.72 | 28.02 | 33.88 |
| s.d. | 1.7 | 0.33 | 1.31 | 3.36 | 60.00 | 6.57 | 2.97 | 1.22 | |
| Median | 5.66 | 4.44 | 12.9 | 37.4 | 277.5 | 84.15 | 28.55 | 34.05 | |
| Reference range | 3.9–8.6 | 3.66–5.39 | 9.30–16.00 | 28.20–46.20 | 141–494 | 62.40–94.30 | 17.90–32.80 | 30.60–36.60 | |
| - | p-value* | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | 0.8885 | 0.0017 | < 0.05 |
RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell; s.d., standard deviation.
P-values (Mann-Whitney U test) are for comparison of medians for male and female subjects.
TABLE 6.
Means, medians and 95th percentile reference intervals of white blood cell subset percentages for 261 HIV-negative adults in Botswana.
| Subject group | Parameter | Neutrophils | Lymphocytes | Monocytes | Eosinophils | Basophils | Reticulocytes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Mean | 52.13 | 36.63 | 8.04 | 2.69 | 0.44 | 10.11 |
| s.d. | 8.98 | 9.08 | 2.17 | 2.02 | 0.26 | 3.40 | |
| Median | 52.4 | 37.6 | 7.9 | 2 | 0.4 | 9.2 | |
| 95% range | 29.40–73.40 | 15.80–56.70 | 3.20–15.90 | 0.20–12.40 | 0.0–1.50 | 3.30–22.30 | |
| Female | Mean | 52.19 | 37.69 | 7.74 | 2.36 | 0.44 | 9.45 |
| s.d. | 10.04 | 8.76 | 2.15 | 2.02 | 0.25 | 3.39 | |
| Median | 52.85 | 8.42 | 7 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 9.3 | |
| 95% range | 29.40–73.40 | 15.80–56.70 | 3.20–15.90 | 0.20–12.40 | 0.0–1.50 | 3.30–22.30 | |
| - | p-value | 0.8076 | 0.3280 | 0.0089 | 0.2643 | 0.9334 | 0.2290 |
s.d., standard deviation.
P-values (Mann-Whitney U test) are for comparison of medians for male and female subjects.
TABLE 7.
Comparison of haematological parameters between different populations.
| Parameter | Sex | Botswanan | South African | Kenyan | Ugandan blood donors | Eastern and Southern African | Ethiopian | US-based Comparison interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | - | (This Study) | 33 | 18 | 13 | 18 | 16 | 30 |
| WBC (109/L) | Combined | 3–10 | - | 2.8–8.2 | 2.8–8.2 | 3.1–9.1 | 3.0–9.8 | 4.5–11.0 |
| Male | - | 3.92–10.4 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 3.90–12.6 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| RBC (1012/L) | Combined | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 4.4–6.0 | 4 | .19–5.85 | 4.4–6.3 | 3.8–6.1 | 4.0–6.4 | 4.3–5.9 | 4.5–5.9 |
| Female | 3.7–5.1 | 3.93–5.40 | 3.7–5.6 | 3.3–5.3 | 3.8–5.6 | 3.7–5.2 | 4.0–5.2 | |
| HGB (g/dL) | Combined | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 13–17 | 13.4–17.5 | 8.3–11.3 | 11.6–17.1 | 12.2–17.7 | 13.9–18.3 | 13.5–17.5 | |
| Female | 9–15 | 11.6–16.4 | 5.9–10.0 | 9.8–16.2 | 9.5–15.8 | 12.2–16.6 | 12.0–16.0 | |
| HCT (%) | Combined | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 38–49 | 39–51 | 40–50 | 33.8–49.5 | 35.0–50.8 | 41.6–55.1 | 41–53 | |
| Female | 29–43 | 34–48 | 30–50 | 28.3–46.8 | 29.4–45.4 | 35.3–48.8 | 36–46 | |
| PLT (109/L) | Combined | 160–395 | - | 120–411 | 109–384 | 126–438 | - | 150–350 |
| Male | - | 171–338 | - | - | - | 97–324 | - | |
| Female | - | 186–454 | - | - | - | 98–352 | - | |
| MCH (pg) | Combined | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 24–33 | 27.8–34.8 | 23.3–33.8 | 23.0–33.8 | - | - | - | |
| Female | 20–32 | 26.1–33.5 | 21.3–33.0 | 24.8–32.7 | - | - | - | |
| MCHC (g/dL) | Combined | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Male | 31–37 | 33.0–35.0 | 32.2–35.2 | 32.4–35.3 | - | - | - | |
| Female | 31–37 | 32.7–34.9 | 32.2–35.3 | 33–35.5 | - | - | - | |
| MCV (fL) | Combined | - | - | - | - | 68-98 | - | 80–100 |
| Male | 76–93 | 83.1–101.6 | 71.4–98.2 | 71–97 | - | - | - | |
| Female | 65–95 | 78.9–98.5 | 66.0–95.7 | 74–94.5 | - | - | - | |
| Neutrophils count (109/L) | Combined | 1.2–5.6 | - | 914–4715 | 0.9–3.9 | 1.0–5.3 | - | 1.8–7.7 |
| Male | - | 1.6–6.98 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 1.6–8.3 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Neutrophils (%) | Combined | 33–69 | - | 40–60 | 22.2–59.3 | 25-66 | - | 40–70 |
| Male | - | 32–76 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 34–72 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Lymphocyte counts (109/L) | Combined | 1.0–3.6 | - | 1140–3454 | 1.2–3.7 | 1.2–3.7 | 0.96–3.47 | 1.0–4.8 |
| Male | - | 1.4–4.2 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 1.4–4.5 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Lymphocytes (%) | Combined | 20–54 | - | 20–60 | 26.7–61.2 | 23-59 | 16–55.4 | 22–44 |
| Male | - | 18–56 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 21–56 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Monocyte counts (109/L) | Combined | 0.2–0.7 | 0.3–0.8 | 130–600 | 0.2–0.7 | 0.20–0.78 | 0.17–0.70 | 0–0.8 |
| Male | - | 0.2–0.8 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Monocyte (%) | Combined | 4–13 | - | 3–11 | 4.7–12.7 | 4.5–13.1 | 4–10.7 | 4–11 |
| Male | - | 4–12 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 3–10 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Eosinophils count (109/L) | Combined | 0.01–0.50 | 0–0.95 | 30–1139 | 0.04–1.6 | 0.04–1.53 | - | 0–0.45 |
| Male | - | 0–0.40 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Eosinophils (%) | Combined | 0–9 | - | 1–20 | 1.0–25 | 0.8–21.8 | - | 0–8 |
| Male | - | 0–8 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 0–6 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Basophils count (109/L) | Combined | 0.01–0.06 | 0-0.1 | 10–80 | 0.01–0.08 | 0.01–0.15 | - | 0–0.2 |
| Male | - | 0–0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Basophils (%) | Combined | 0–2 | - | 0–2 | 0.3–1.4 | 0.4–2.5 | - | 0–3 |
| Male | - | 0–2 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Female | - | 0–1 | - | - | - | - | - |
RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell; HGB, haemoglobin concentration; HCT, haematocrit; PLT, platelets; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin weight ; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume of single red cell.
Note: Please see the full reference list of the article, Mine M, Moyo S, Stevens P, et al. Immunohaematological reference values for HIV-negative healthy adults in Botswana. Afr J Lab Med. 2011;1(1), Art. #5, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.5, for more information.
Discussion
The reference intervals for immunohaematological and clinical chemistry parameters, which may serve as Botswanan standards for the interpretation of laboratory results, were established from 260 HIV-negative participants (134 women [52%] and 126 men [48%]) aged 18–66 years, from around Gaborone. As expected, the percentage CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes varied less between women and men. Malone et al.31 reported large fluctuations in repeated CD4+ cell counts in HIV-positive patients and can be explained, in part, by CD4+ cell count diurnal cycle, and also by high variability in total lymphocyte counts. HIV-negative women have a higher average CD4+ T-lymphocytes count than men, which confirms the findings of Bussmann et al.32 The CD4 cell counts are lower in Botswana than those observed in East Africa and USA. This has obvious implications on the clinical staging of AIDS and the assessment for disease progression.
The significant gender difference in red blood cell count, haemoglobin and haematocrit, agrees with other studies16 and with the well-established fact that men have higher values for the red blood cell parameters than women, partly because of the influence of the hormone androgen on erythropoiesis, and partly because of menstrual loss. The red blood cell parameters for the Botswanan population were within the intervals for the Ethiopian population, even though the expectation was that altitude induces erythropoiesis, which has accounted for the red blood cell parameters of Ethiopia that were consistently higher than those of many other African countries.16
The median haemoglobin level was significantly lower for women than for men, which is consistent with previous findings.8,9,21,27 The female haemoglobin reference value (9.0 g/dL to 15.0 g/dL) levels were lower than observed in predominantly White populations (12.0 g/dL to 16.0 g/dL), but comparable with East African and Southern African regional consensus reference intervals (9.5 g/dL to 15.8 g/dL) recently defined for East and Southern Africa. The Division of AIDS (DAIDS) has haematological criteria for grading the severity of potential vaccine-related adverse events.22 White blood cell and platelet counts, and haemoglobin levels are used as inclusion and/or exclusion criteria in many clinical trials. The lower limit of Botswana’s normal female reference range for haemoglobin qualifies as a moderate adverse event and a significant proportion of the woman may not qualify to be enrolled for Phase I and/or Phase II vaccine trials.
The methodologies in this study are commonly used, and should serve well as guidelines for the represented population. Laboratories that wish to adopt these reference intervals should explore any differences in methodology, and should verify the transference and appropriateness of the reference intervals to their laboratory.
Limitations of the study
Although this study meets the minimum CLSI requirements for establishing valid reference intervals, it is be important to explore further geographic and ethic differences that may exist within the Botswanan population. One limitation of our study is that, despite our efforts to include only healthy subjects, the use of a questionnaire, as well as HIV screening and a review by a physician, it was not feasible to screen for all medical conditions that might have influenced the laboratory results. For instance, participants were not examined for other infections such as respiratory infections, recent transient gastroenteritis and sexually transmitted infections. All participants were adults drawn from voluntary counselling and testing facilities. When reporting reference values, the actual representativeness of the data is an important concern for the underlying population. As in most studies, we cannot totally exclude the possibility that there is some sampling bias because of use of a self-selecting population. Our analysis excluded participants who showed any signs or symptoms of disease, however, and it is thus likely that our data are representative of healthy adults from the southern region of Botswana. Gaborone is the capital city of Botswana and has a diversity of ethnic groups; consequently, reference values from this region are not likely to make a significant clinical difference. Because of access to a reference laboratory working under ISO and GCLP standards, it was not easy to include regions that are further away from the capital city, but this data is still considered to be a very important baseline for similar future studies. The data are also immediately applicable in studies and clinical care that is an improvement over the current practice of using reference values derived from elsewhere.
Conclusion
This is the first study in Botswana to document haematological reference intervals for healthy adults. Our study shows that clinical reference values developed within the region are more appropriate for the Botswanan population than those adopted from developed countries. The established values provide an important tool for patient management and could influence decisions on the inclusion of participants, as well as the management of adverse events. It could also improve scientific validity in clinical trials that are conducted locally and regionally.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their time and patience. The authors also extend their gratitude to the Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT) management for availing the use of their facilities for the recruitment of the study participants. In addition, the authors would like to thank the Ministry of Health and Botswana Harvard Partnership for supporting the study. The project was also supported by Grant Number U01AI069456 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) which may have influenced them inappropriately in writing this article.
Authors’ contributions
M. Mine (National Health Laboratory), V.N. (Harvard School of Public Health), R. Marlink (Harvard School of Public Health) and M.E. (Harvard School of Public Health) conceived and designed the study, and M. Mine, S. Moyo (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), P.S. (Johns Hopkins University), K. Michael (Johns Hopkins University) and M.H.-P. (Harvard School of Public Health) wrote the article. S. Moyo and M. Mine analysed the data. Clinical support was provided by A.A. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), N.N. (Ministry of Health), J.M. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), K.S. (Ministry of Health), T.G. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), E.W. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital) and I.M. (National Health Laboratory) (Medical doctors), and by S. Molefhabangwe (deceased) (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), as well as by G.M. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital) (Study Nurses and recruiters). K. Makhaola (National Health Laboratory), T.M. (Princess Marina Hospital), C.K. (National Health Laboratory), P.M.M. (BHP Princess Marina Hospital), R. Musonda (BHP Princess Marina Hospital) and M. Motswaledi (Ministry of Health) provided laboratory support.
Footnotes
How to cite this article: Mine M, Moyo S, Stevens P, et al. Immunohaematological reference values for HIV-negative healthy adults in Botswana. Afr J Lab Med. 2011;1(1), Art. #5, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.5
References
- 1.Central Statistics Office/National AIDS Coordinating Agency (CSO/NACA) Botswana behavioural AIDS impact survey III Gaborone, Botswana: Central Statistics Office/National AIDS Coordinating Agency; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ministry of Health Botswana 2007. Botswana ANC second generation HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance Technical report De La Hoz Gomez F, Anderson MG, Bodika S, et al., editors. Gaborone, Botswana: Botswana Government Print; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 3.PLoSMedicineEditors A new vision for clinical trials in Africa. PLoS Med. 2004;1:e71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0010071, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ojikutu B, Makadzange AT, Gaolathe T. Scaling up ART treatment capacity: Lessons learned from South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Botswana. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008;10:69–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11908-008-0012-0, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bussmann H, Wester CW, Ndwapi N, et al. . Five-year outcomes of initial patients treated in Botswana’s national antiretroviral treatment program. AIDS. 2008;22:2303–2311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283129db0, PMid: , PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Excler JL. AIDS vaccine efficacy trials: Expand capacity and prioritize. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2006;5:167–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.5.2.167, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials Rockville, MD: Botswana Government Print; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kibaya RS, Bautista CT, Sawe FK, et al. . Reference ranges for the clinical laboratory derived from a rural population in Kericho, Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003327, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bain BJ. Ethnic and sex differences in the total and differential white cell count and platelet count. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:664–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.49.8.664, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mazzaccara C, Labruna G, Cito G, et al. . Age-related reference intervals of the main biochemical and hematological parameters in C57BL/6J, 129SV/EV and C3H/HeJ mouse strains. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003772, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lugada ES, Mermin J, Kaharuza F, et al. . Population-based hematologic and immunologic reference values for a healthy Ugandan population. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:29–34. PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saathoff E, Schneider P, Kleinfeldt V, et al. . Laboratory reference values for healthy adults from southern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:612–625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02047.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tugume SB, Piwowar EM, Lutalo T, et al. . Hematological reference ranges among healthy Ugandans. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2:233–235. PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lawrie D, Coetzee LM, Becker P, Mahlangu J, Stevens W, Glencross DK. Local reference ranges for full blood count and CD4 lymphocyte count testing. S Afr Med J. 2009;99:243–248. PMid: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Otahbachi M, Simoni J, Simoni G, et al. . Gender differences in platelet aggregation in healthy individuals. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010;30:184–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-009-0436-x, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tsegaye A, Wolday D, Otto S, et al. . Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes at birth, during childhood, and during adulthood in HIV-1-uninfected Ethiopians. Clin Immunol. 2003;109:338–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2003.08.008, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Menard D, Mandeng MJ, Tothy MB, Kelembho EK, Gresenguet G, Talarmin A. Immunohematological reference ranges for adults from the Central African Republic. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10:443–445. PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karita E, Ketter N, Price MA, et al. . CLSI-derived hematology and biochemistry reference intervals for healthy adults in Eastern and Southern Africa. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004401, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eller LA, Eller MA, Ouma B, et al. . Reference intervals in healthy adult Ugandan blood donors and their impact on conducting international vaccine trials. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003919, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wells J, Shetty AK, Stranix L, et al. . Range of normal neutrophil counts in healthy Zimbabwean infants: Implications for monitoring antiretroviral drug toxicity. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:460–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000224975.45091.a5, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lubega IR, Fowler MG, Musoke PM, et al. . Considerations in using US-based laboratory toxicity tables to evaluate laboratory toxicities among healthy Malawian and Ugandan infants. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:58–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181db059d, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Division of AIDS (DAIDS) The division of AIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events (DAIDS AE Grading Table) USA: National Institutes of Health; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bussmann H, Wester CW, Masupu KV, et al. . Low CD4+ T-lymphocyte values in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults in Botswana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:930–935. PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lawrie D, Coetzee LM, Becker P, Mahlangu J, Stevens W, Glencross DK. Local reference ranges for full blood count and CD4 lymphocyte count testing. S Afr Med J. 2010;99. PMid: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mills E, Cooper C, Guyatt G, et al. . Barriers to participating in an HIV vaccine trial: A systematic review. AIDS. 2004;18:2235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200411190-00003, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gilmour JW, Stevens WS, Gray C, De Souza M. Laboratory expansion to large-scale international HIV preventive vaccine trials. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2007;2:201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e3280eec77a, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stevens W, Kamali A, Karita E, et al. . Baseline morbidity in 2,990 adult African volunteers recruited to characterize laboratory reference intervals for future HIV vaccine clinical trials. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002043, PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory: Approved guideline 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rhoads DG. Understading reference intervals In: Rhoads DG, editor. EP evaluator release 8 for evaluating clinical laboratory methods. Kennett Square, Pennsylavania: David G. Rhoads and Associates, Inc.; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cabot RC, Harris NL, Shepard J-AO, et al. . Normal reference laboratory values. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1548–1563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcpc049016, PMid: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Malone JL, Simms TE, Gray GC, Wagner KF, Burge JR, Burke DS. Sources of variability in repeated T-helper lymphocyte counts from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: Total lymphocyte count fluctuations and diurnal cycle are important. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1990;3:144–151. PMid: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bussmann H, Wester CW, Masupu KV, et al. . Low CD4+ T-Lymphocyte Values in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults in Botswana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:930–935. PMid:, PMCid: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]