Skip to main content
PMC home page
Mediators of Inflammation logoLink to Mediators of Inflammation
. 2013 Jun 2;2013:140812. doi: 10.1155/2013/140812

Activation of Protease-Activated Receptor 2-Mediated Signaling by Mast Cell Tryptase Modulates Cytokine Production in Primary Cultured Astrocytes

Xiaoning Zeng 1, Shu Zhang 1, Luwei Xu 2, Haiwei Yang 1, Shaoheng He 1,*
PMCID: PMC3684029  PMID: 23818741

Abstract

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2), which is abundantly expressed in astrocytes, is known to play major roles in brain inflammation. However, the influence of the natural agonist of PAR-2, tryptase, on proinflammatory mediator releasedfrom astrocytes remains uninvestigated. In the present study, we found that tryptase at lower concentrations modestly reduced intracellular ROS production but significantly increased IL-6 and TNF-α secretion at higher concentrations without affecting astrocytic viability and proliferation. The actions of tryptase were alleviated by specific PAR-2 antagonist FSLLRY-NH2 (FS), indicating that the actions of tryptase were via PAR-2. PI3K/AKT inhibitor LY294002 reversed the effect of tryptase on IL-6 production, whereas inhibitors specific for p38, JNK, and ERK1/2 abolished the effect of tryptase on TNF-α production, suggesting that different signaling pathways are involved. Moreover, tryptase-induced activation of MAPKs and AKT was eliminated by FS, implicating that PAR-2 is responsible for transmitting tryptase biosignals to MAPKs and AKT. Tryptase provoked also expression of TGF-β and CNTF in astrocytes. The present findings suggest for the first time that tryptase can regulate the release of cytokines from astrocytes via PAR-2-MAPKs or PAR-2-PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, which reveals PAR-2 as a new target actively participating in the regulation of astrocytic functions.

1. Introduction

As a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors, newfound protease-activated receptors (PARs) are widely expressed on the cells in central nervous system (CNS), including neurons and glial cells [1], regulating cell responses to extracellular serine proteases as cell surface sensors and contributing extensively to the regulation of homeostasis as well as to the dysfunctional responses of these cells required for progression of cerebral diseases [2]. Among the four PARs identified to date, PAR-2 is a unique one activated by trypsin and mast cell tryptase while others (PAR-1, -3, and -4) activated by thrombin [3]. The role of PAR-2, which is distributed extensively throughout the nervous system (including CNS and peripheral nervous system), has been principally investigated in peripheral nervous system, where it is known to play major roles in injury, inflammation, neuronal signaling, and nociception [4, 5]. And the physiological role of PAR-2 in CNS remains unclear but its activation has been shown to increase intracellular Ca2+ levels in both neurons and astrocytes [6, 7] as well as trigger the release of gliotransmitters such as GRO/CINC-1 [8–10] and nitric oxide [11]. Recent group of evidence have revealed that PAR-2 contributes to neuroprotection and/or neurodegeneration in the brain under pathological conditions [12–15]. Therefore, PAR-2 has been suggested to be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of brain disorders.

Tryptase, the major secretory protein of mast cells, is the natural agonist of PAR-2 and can stimulate peripheral mononuclear cells to secrete tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) [16] to induce widespread inflammation [17]. Although mast cells typically reside at barrier sites of the body such as the intestinal mucosa and blood brain barrier (BBB) [18], Silverman et al. found that mast cells can rapidly penetrate brain blood vessels and migrate into the neural parenchyma [19], implying an interaction between mast cells and nerve tissue cells. As the most abundant cells in brain parenchyma, astrocytes play pivotal roles in BBB integrity and CNS function such as synapse formation [20], communication [21], cerebrovascular tone [22], adult neurogenesis [23], as well as neuroimmune [24]. Since PAR-2 is widely expressed in astrocytes and is recognized for the modulatory properties of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration such as multiple sclerosis [25], its contribution to astrocytic functions remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the consequence of tryptase stimulation on (1) the astrocytic survival and proliferation; (2) the production of IL-6, TNF-α, and reactive oxygen species (ROS); (3) the involvement of MAPKs and PI3K/AKT pathways in PAR-2 activation; (4) the levels of potent neural cytokines transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) generated by astrocytes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco-BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). Poly-D-lysine, tryptase, SB203580, PD98059, SP600125, and LY294002 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). PAR-2 inhibitor FS were synthesized by CL Bio-Scientific Inc. (Xi An, China). Dojindo Cell Counting Kit-8 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Rat IL-6 Immunoassay Kit and Rat TNF-α Immunoassay Kit were obtained from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). LIVE green reactive oxygen species detection kit was purchased from Molecular Probes Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Specific glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) antibody (a marker for astrocytes) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Specific monoclonal antibodies against p38, phospho-p38, SAPK/JNK (c-JUN N-terminal kinase), phospho-SAPK/JNK, p44/42 MAPK (extracellular regulated protein kinases, ERK), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (phospho-ERK) and AKT, and phospho-AKT were obtained from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA). Specific polyclonal antibodies against TGF-β and CNTF were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, UK).

2.2. Primary Astrocyte Cultures

Confluent primary astrocyte cultures were prepared from Sprague-Dawley rats as previously described with slight modification. All animal procedures were performed according to the NIH Guide for Animal Care and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Briefly, postnatal (P1-P2) rats were killed by rapid decapitation, cerebral cortices were triturated and cells were plated on poly-D-lysine precoated culture flasks in DMEM, containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Culture medium was replaced 24 h later and then changed every 2-3 days. After reaching a confluent monolayer of cells (10–14 days), microglia were eliminated from astrocytes by shaking off for 5 h at 100 r.p.m. and astrocytes were replated in poly-D-lysine coated culture dishes, 96-well or 6-well plates. The enriched astrocytes were >98% pure as determined by astrocytic marker GFAP.

2.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell viability was measured by conversion of Dojindo's highly water-soluble tetrazolium salt WST-8 to a yellow-colored water-soluble formazan (CCK8 assay). The amount of formazan dye generated by the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenases in cells is directly proportional to the number of living cells. CCK8 is more sensitive than the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay [26]. Cells were collected and seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 105 cells/cm2. After incubation for 48 h, cells were exposed to fresh medium containing various concentrations of tryptase (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL) at 37°C for further 24 h. Then, 20 μL of CCK8 solution in PBS was added to each well and the plates were incubated for an additional 2 h. The optical density of each well was measured using a microculture plate reader at a 450 nm wavelength.

2.4. Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Assay

The production of intracellular ROS was analyzed by 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH) oxidation. The 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) reagent passively enters cell where it is deacetylated by esterase to nonfluorescent DCFH. Inside the cell, DCFH reacts with ROS to form 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), the fluorescent product. For this assay, 10 mM of DCFH-DA was dissolved in DMSO and was diluted 500-fold in HBSS to give 20 μM of DCFH-DA. Enriched-astrocyte cultures seeded (5 × 104) in 96-well plates were then exposed to DCFH-DA for 1 h at 37°C in dark, followed by treatment with HBSS containing various concentrations of tryptase for 2 h. After being rinsed twice with PBS, green fluorescence from DCF in cells was measured in the FL1 Log channel through a 525-nm band-pass filter on the Coulter EPICS XL/X1-MCL (Beckman Coulter Company, Miami, FL, USA).

2.5. IL-6 and TNF-α Assay

The amount of IL-6 and TNF-α in the culture medium was measured with commercial ELISA kits from R&D Systems, respectively.

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

Cells were collected and homogenized in 200 μL lysing buffer. After incubation for 20 min on ice, cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4°C for 10 min and protein concentration in the extracts was determined by the Bradford assay. Proteins in cell extracts were denatured with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel at 80 V for 2 h. Then proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes at 300 mA for various time points by using a Bio-Rad miniprotein-III wet transfer unit. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA dissolved in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) (pH 7.5, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20) at room temperature for 1 h. This was followed by incubating the membranes with different antibodies (anti-p38, -phospho-p38; -JNK, -phospho-JNK; -ERK, -phospho-ERK; -AKT, -phospho-AKT; -TGF-β at 1 : 800 dilution and -CNTF at 1 : 1500 dilution) overnight at 4°C, and finally incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands on the membranes were visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence kit.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All values shown are presented as means ± SEM. The significance of the difference between control and samples treated with various drugs was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc least significant difference test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Tryptase Had No Effect on the Astrocytic Viability

Cell survival measured by CCK8 analysis revealed that incubation with different dose of tryptase (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL) for 24 h had no significant effect on astrocytic viability and proliferation. No impact was either observed in specific PAR-2 inhibitor FS (200 or 400 μM), p38 inhibitor SB203580 (20 μM), JNK inhibitor SP600125 (20 μM), ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (20 μM) and PI3K/AKT inhibitor LY294002 (20 μM) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of tryptase (Tt) and specific inhibitor of PAR-2 or MAPKs on the viability of astrocytes. For the dose-dependent studies astrocytes were treated with either culture medium only or various concentrations of tryptase (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL), FSLLRY-NH2 (FS, 200 or 400 μM), SB203580 (SB, 20 μM), PD98059 (PD, 20 μM), SP600125 (SP, 20 μM) and LY294002 (LY, 20 μM) for 24 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM in triplicate on four separate occasions. *P < 0.05 versus control groups (Con).

3.2. Tryptase Inhibits ROS Production in Primary Cultured Astrocytes via PAR-2

The results of the DCF assay indicated that incubation with tryptase at low concentrations (0.001 and 0.01 μg/mL) for 2 h modestly inhibited the intracellular levels of ROS, which was abolished by FS (400 μM) (Figure 2). The fluorescence of DCF in cells decreased to 83% (0.001 μg/mL group) and 86% (0.01 μg/mL group) of that in the control, and specific PAR-2 inhibitor FS diminished the effects of tryptase (0.001 μg/mL) on ROS generation in astrocytes, implying that activation of PAR-2 at low concentrations of tryptase is responsible for the inhibition of ROS production.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of tryptase (Tt) on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from astrocytes. Astrocytes were exposed to different concentrations of tryptase (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of FSLLRY-NH2 (FS, 400 μM), an antagonist of tryptase at 37°C for 2 h. ROS was presented as changes of DCF fluorescence. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM analyzed from three independent sets of samples. *P < 0.05 versus control group (Con), # P < 0.05 versus corresponding tryptase treatment group.

3.3. Tryptase Regulated IL-6 and TNF-α Secretion from Primary Cultured Astrocytes via PAR-2

As shown in Figure 3, incubation with tryptase at the dose of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL for 24 h produced a concentration dependent increase in IL-6 secretion from primary cultured astrocytes with a minimum effective dose of 0.1 μg/mL (Figure 3(a)). Meanwhile, tryptase (1 and 10 μg/mL) also increased TNF-α secretion at a minimum effective dose of 1 μg/mL (Figure 3(b)), but modestly inhibited TNF-α secretion at the dose of 0.001 μg/mL. PAR-2 inhibitor FS (200 and 400 μM) was able to diminish tryptase (1 μg/mL) induced IL-6 and TNF-α increase but itself alone (200 and 400 μM) failed to affect IL-6 and TNF-α secretion from astrocytes (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), suggesting that tryptase is able to modulate the secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α from astrocytes via PAR-2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of tryptase (Tt) on the secretion of IL-6 (a) and TNF-α (b) from astrocytes. Astrocytes were exposed to different concentrations of tryptase (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of FSLLRY-NH2 (FS, 200 or 400 μM), an antagonist of tryptase at 37°C for 24 h before culture supernatant being collected. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control groups (Con), # P < 0.05 versus corresponding tryptase treatment groups.

3.4. Tryptase Regulated TNF-α but Not IL-6 Secretion via MAPKs from Primary Cultured Astrocytes

To investigate the involvement of MAPKs and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in the IL-6 and TNF-α secretion, we used pharmacological inhibitors of MAPKs and PI3K/AKT. SB203580 is a pyridinyl imidazole compound which acts as a competitive inhibitor of ATP binding on the p38 kinase and thus serves as a specific inhibitor of p38 MAPKs. PD98059 is a potent, selective, and cell-permeable inhibitor of MEK1, which results in inhibition of the phosphorylation and activation of ERK1/2. SP600126 is a potent, selective, reversible, and cell-permeable inhibitor of JNK, a Ser/Thr kinase that phosphorylates c-jun. LY294002 is a potent, selective, cell permeable, and specific inhibitor of PI3K/AKT. As shown in Figure 4, SB203580 (20 μM), PD98059 (20 μM), SP600125 (20 μM), and LY294002 (20 μM) alone did not have impacts on the secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α from astrocytes. tryptase (1 μg/mL) induced IL-6 increase was reversed by LY294002, but not by inhibitors of MAPKs (SB203580, PD98059, SP600125) (Figure 4(a)). However, tryptase (1 μg/mL) induced TNF-α increase was reversed by SB203580, PD98059, SP600125, and partially by LY294002 (Figure 4(b)), indicating that PI3K/AKT signaling pathway contributes to the secretion of TNF-α and IL-6 induced by tryptase, respectively, whereas MAPKs signaling pathway is involved in the tryptase induced secretion of TNF-α, but not IL-6.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of inhibitors of cell signaling pathways on tryptase (Tt)-induced secretion of IL-6 (a) and TNF-α (b) from astrocytes. Astrocytes were exposed to 1 μg/mL of tryptase in the presence or absence of SB203580 (SB, 20 μM), PD98059 (PD, 20 μM), SP600125 (SP, 20 μM), and LY294002 (LY, 20 μM) at 37°C for 24 h before culture supernatant being collected. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control groups (Con), # P < 0.05 versus corresponding tryptase treatment groups.

3.5. Tryptase Activated MAPKs and PI3K/AKT in Primary Cultured Astrocytes via PAR-2

In order to further understand the actions of tryptase on astrocytes, we examined the effects of tryptase on phosphorylation of cell signaling molecules. Tryptase at 1 μg/mL activated p38 MAPK, JNK, ERK (p44/42), and AKT, which was confirmed by increased phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of these kinases as determined by Western blot analysis. The time course experiments showed that treatment with tryptase (1 μg/mL) led to a rapid and transient phosphorylation of MAPKs and AKT with the peak levels of phospho-p38, phospho-JNK, and phosphor-ERK (p44/42) occurring at 30 min, and phospho-AKT at 60 min, respectively (Figure 5(a)). Astrocytes were pretreated with PAR-2 antagonist FS (200 and 400 μM) for 30 min and then exposed to tryptase (1 μg/mL) for another 30 min or 60 min for detecting the phosphorylation of MAPKs and AKT, respectively. PAR-2 antagonist FS alleviated tryptase-induced MAPKs activation but itself alone had no effect on the phosphorylation of MAPKs and AKT in astrocytes (Figure 5(b)), indicating that activation of PAR-2 by tryptase might be responsible for the activation of MAPKs and PI3K/AKT.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of tryptase (Tt) on the activation of MAPKs and PI3K/AKT. (a) Time courses of tryptase activated p38, JNK, ERK, and AKT, which was assessed by increased phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of these kinases. Astrocytes were incubated with 1 μg/mL of tryptase for the indicated periods (0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min). (b) FSLLRY-NH2 (FS, 200 or 400 μM) alleviated tryptase (1 μg/mL) induced MAPKs and PI3K/AKT activation. Astrocytes were incubated with 1 μg/mL of tryptase in the presence or absence of FS, an antagonist of tryptase at 37°C for 30 min. Activated p38 (p-p38), JNK/SAPK (p-JNK), ERK (p-ERK), and AKT (p-AKT) species were detected by immunoblot analysis with antibodies specific for the phosphorylated forms of each kinase. The amount of protein loaded in each lane was confirmed by measuring the amount of p38, JNK, ERK, and AKT reacted to the antibody against the unphosphorylated form of each kinase. This is a representative experiment independently performed three times. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus control groups (Con), # P < 0.05 versus corresponding tryptase treatment groups.

3.6. Tryptase Enhanced TGF-β and CNTF Expression in Primary Cultured Astrocytes

The time course study (incubation with 1 μg/mL tryptase for 0, 30, 60, 120, 240 min) showed that tryptase significantly promoted TGF-β expression in astrocytes, which began at 2 h and lasted at least until 4 h. However, an increase of CNTF expression induced by tryptase (1 μg/mL) initiated rapidly at 1 h following incubation and lasted at least until 4 h (Figure 6). The enhancement in TGF-β and CNTF levels indicates that tryptase can induce endogenous production of TGF-β and CNTF, which probably contributes to neuroprotection.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Time courses of tryptase (Tt) on the expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) in astrocytes. (a) Tryptase at 1 μg/mL was incubated with astrocytes at 37°C for 0, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min, respectively. Protein levels were detected by immunoblot analysis with specific antibodies. Western blots at the top of each panel are from a typical experiment. (b) Bar graphs are the quantified results expressed as mean ± SEM of TGF-β and CNTF levels from three independent experiments. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus 0 min.

4. Discussion

Astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells are involved in the intracerebral immune response where they act, in part, by secreting cytokines, chemokines, neurotrophic or neurotoxic factors [27]. Among them, astrocytes play an essential role in neuronal life-support and contribute to the BBB. They also act as neuroprotectors by secreting neurotrophins and release potentially toxic inflammatory molecules [28]. So in the present work, we put our focus on astrocytes with an emphasis on its potential role in the cytokine production involved in neuroimmune processes.

In this study, we first found that tryptase is able to regulate cytokines release from astrocytes without affecting astrocytic viability and proliferation via PAR-2-MAPKs or PAR-2-PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, revealing a novel profile of PAR-2 as a new target in the regulation of astrocytic function.

Tryptase, a major secretory protein of human mast cells, is an endogenous peptide which specifically activates PAR-2. Incubation with tryptase at low concentrations (0.001 and 0.01 μg/mL) modestly inhibited the intracellular levels of ROS in astrocytes, indicating this protease is a potent factor to modulate astrocytes-derived ROS. The specific antagonist peptide of PAR-2 FS diminished the effect of tryptase on ROS generation, implying that the inhibition of the intracellular ROS by tryptase might at least partially be responsible for the activation of PAR-2. In the brain, ROS exerts a key role in normal physiological functions and neuroimmune responses [26, 29], and astrocytes are the important sources of ROS. Imbalance in the level of ROS has been shown to be a causative factor in numerous pathologies such as ischemia/reperfusion injury and degenerative diseases [29, 30]. Considerable amount of evidence suggests oxidative stress induced by astrocytes-derived ROS is a crucial contributor to neurodegeneration [31, 32]. Our current observation implicates that moderate stimulation of PAR-2 existed in astrocytes might regulate astrocytes-derived ROS and supplies a new option for the management of CNS functions.

IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in the regulation of inflammatory and immunological responses, acute phase protein production, and hematopoiesis [33]. There is increasing evidence supporting a role for the IL-6 receptor family in CNS development, as well as during neurodegeneration and regeneration [34]. Like many cytokines, IL-6 may have distinct physiological effects at different concentrations and in different biological contexts [35]. Like IL-6, TNF-α now appears also to play an important role in neural plasticity and neurorepair [36–38] in addition to its well established function as a proinflammatory cytokine. Here we presented data investigating the consequence of PAR-2 activation by various concentrations of tryptase on IL-6 and TNF-α secretion from astrocytes. We found that tryptase administration produced a concentration dependent increase in IL-6 and TNF-α secretion with a minimum effective dose of 0.1 μg/mL and 1 μg/mL, respectively, suggesting that the stimulation of IL-6 generation by tryptase is more sensitive than that of TNF-α in astrocytes, which is distinct from the data obtained from microglia [39]. Since neuroinflammation could generate an environment detrimental for repair, alternatively it could also create an environment permissive for neurorepair [40], our findings implicate that mast cell tryptase is able to regulate the activity of astrocytes and the levels of neuroinflammatory proteins released from astrocytes such as IL-6 and TNF-α so as to modulate the balance between neuroinflammation and neurorepair [33].

Moreover, tryptase-induced IL-6 and TNF-α release from astrocytes appeared to rely on the activation of PAR-2 as a specific antagonist peptide of PAR-2 FS was able to block the action of tryptase on astrocytes. PAR-2 was identified to be expressed abundantly on astrocytes [6], PAR-2 activation in astrocytes has been demonstrated to play a key modulatory role in diverse pathological conditions [15, 41, 42], but the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified. The intracellular downstream MAPKs have been demonstrated to be involved in the regulation of astrocytic function including the production of neuroinflammatory factors in astrocytes. Indeed, our results showed that the intracellular signaling mechanisms that mediate tryptase-induced TNF-α release rather than IL-6 release from astrocytes are p38, JNK, and ERK dependent, as SB203580, PD98059, and SP600125 all significantly eliminated TNF-α release. As well, tryptase-induced TNF-α increase was partly due to PI3K/AKT signaling. Similarly, PI3K/AKT signaling is also responsible for the enhanced production of IL-6, which is consistent with the finding previously reported [43]. Thus, our data provide new evidence that PI3K/AKT signaling pathway contributes to the secretion of TNF-α and IL-6 induced by tryptase, whereas MAPKs signaling pathway is involved in the tryptase induced secretion of TNF-α, but not IL-6.

In addition, since TGF-β and CNTF are potent neural cytokines with very low expression predominantly by astrocytes [44] and both cytokines play very important roles in the modulation of CNS function including neuroinflammation and neurorepair, the levels of TGF-β and CNTF expressed in astrocytes were determined in our study. We found that tryptase administration significantly upregulated TGF-β and CNTF expression in astrocytes initiated at 2 h and 1 h, respectively, implying that tryptase is as well potent to increase endogenous levels of TGF-β and CNTF which probably contribute to neuroprotection. CNTF is almost exclusively produced in the nervous system and can rescue various types of adult CNS neurons in disease models [45–47]. TGF-β performs a critical function in nervous system development and repair [48–50]. Both of them are closely implicated in neurodevelopment and neurorepair. Our results not only reveal tryptase as a potent factor to regulate TGF-β and CNTF production in astrocytes but may also provide a novel therapeutic option to neurological disorders. Obviously, more detailed work is required to address the issue further.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the ability of mast cell tryptase in modulation of astrocytic activation and astrocytes-derived cytokine production via PAR-2. The implicated signaling mechanisms that mediate the actions of tryptase might be PAR-2-MAPKs or PAR-2-PI3K/AKT pathways, providing a novel profile of PAR-2 as a new target in the regulation of astrocytic function.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report no financial or other conflict of interests relevant to the subject of this paper.

Authors' Contribution

X. Zeng and S. Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This project was sponsored by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81001428, 81102422, 81001427); the grants from the Key Allergy Laboratory Fund of Jiangsu Province, China (XK201115); a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References

  • 1.Ossovskaya VS, Bunnett NW. Proteaseactivated receptors: contribution to physiology and disease. Physiological Reviews. 2004;84(2):579–621. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams MN, Ramachandran R, Yau M, et al. Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2011;130(3):248–282. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luo W, Wang Y, Reiser G. Protease-activated receptors in the brain: receptor expression, activation, and functions in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Brain Research Reviews. 2007;56(2):331–345. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cottrell GS, Amadesi S, Schmidlin F, Bunnett N. Protease-activated receptor 2: activation, signalling and function. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2003;31(6):1191–1197. doi: 10.1042/bst0311191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vergnolle N, Ferazzini M, D’Andrea MR, Buddenkotte J, Steinhoff M. Proteinase-activated receptors: novel signals for peripheral nerves. Trends in Neurosciences. 2003;26(9):496–500. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00208-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang H, Ubl JJ, Reiser G. Four subtypes of protease-activated receptors, co-expressed in rat astrocytes, evoke different physiological signaling. GLIA. 2002;37(1):53–63. doi: 10.1002/glia.10012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bushell TJ, Plevin R, Cobb S, Irving AJ. Characterization of proteinase-activated receptor 2 signalling and expression in rat hippocampal neurons and astrocytes. Neuropharmacology. 2006;50(6):714–725. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Y, Luo W, Reiser G. Activation of protease-activated receptors in astrocytes evokes a novel neuroprotective pathway through release of chemokines of the growth-regulated oncogene/cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant family. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;26(11):3159–3168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, Luo W, Reiser G. Proteinase-activated receptor-1 and -2 induce the release of chemokine GRO/CINC-1 from rat astrocytes via differential activation of JNK isoforms, evoking multiple protective pathways in brain. Biochemical Journal. 2007;401(1):65–78. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang Y, Luo W, Reiser G. The role of calcium in protease-activated receptor-induced secretion of chemokine GRO/CINC-1 in rat brain astrocytes. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2007;103(2):814–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park GH, Jeon SJ, Ryu JR, et al. Essential role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in protease activated receptor 2-mediated nitric-oxide production from rat primary astrocytes. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21(2):110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jin G, Hayashi T, Kawagoe J, et al. Deficiency of PAR-2 gene increases acute focal ischemic brain injury. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2005;25(3):302–313. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Afkhami-Goli A, Noorbakhsh F, Keller AJ, et al. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 exerts protective and pathogenic cell type-specific effects in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(8):5493–5503. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lohman R, O’Brien TJ, Cocks TM. Protease-activated receptor-2 regulates trypsin expression in the brain and protects against seizures and epileptogenesis. Neurobiology of Disease. 2008;30(1):84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gan J, Greenwood SM, Cobb SR, Bushell TJ. Indirect modulation of neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission in the hippocampus by activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2011;163(5):984–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01293.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malamud V, Vaaknin A, Abramsky O, et al. Tryptase activates peripheral blood mononuclear cells causing the synthesis and release of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β: possible relevance to multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2003;138(1-2):115–122. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00090-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Molino M, Barnathan ES, Numerof R, et al. Interactions of mast cell tryptase with thrombin receptors and PAR-2. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272(7):4043–4049. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Söderholm JD. Mast cells and mastocytosis. Digestive Diseases. 2009;27(supplement 1):129–136. doi: 10.1159/000268133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Silverman A, Sutherland AK, Wilhelm M, Silver R. Mast cells migrate from blood to brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 2000;20(1):401–408. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00401.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christopherson KS, Ullian EM, Stokes CCA, et al. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell. 2005;120(3):421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nedergaard M, Ransom B, Goldman SA. New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends in Neurosciences. 2003;26(10):523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koehler RC, Gebremedhin D, Harder DR. Role of astrocytes in cerebrovascular regulation. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006;100(1):307–317. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00938.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma DK, Ming G, Song H. Glial influences on neural stem cell development: cellular niches for adult neurogenesis. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2005;15(5):514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eyre H, Baune BT. Neuroplastic changes in depression: a role for the immune system. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(9):1397–1416. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Noorbakhsh F, Tsutsui S, Vergnolle N, et al. Proteinase-activated receptor 2 modulates neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2006;203(2):425–435. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kamata H, Hirata H. Redox regulation of cellular signalling. Cellular Signalling. 1999;11(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(98)00037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bailey SL, Carpentier PA, McMahon EJ, Begolka WS, Miller SD. Innate and adaptive immune responses of the central nervous system. Critical Reviews in Immunology. 2006;26(2):149–188. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v26.i2.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sternberg EM. Neural regulation of innate immunity: a coordinated nonspecific host response to pathogens. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2006;6(4):318–328. doi: 10.1038/nri1810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MTD, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2007;39(1):44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Floyd RA. Neuroinflammatory processes are important in neurodegenerative diseases: an hypothesis to explain the increased formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as major factors involved in neurodegenerative disease development. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1999;26(9-10):1346–1355. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang CM, Hsieh HL, Lin CC, et al. Multiple factors from bradykinin-challenged astrocytes contribute to the neuronal apoptosis: involvement of astroglial ROS, MMP-9, and HO-1/CO system. Molecular Neurobiology. 2013;47(3):1020–1033. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8402-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ma D, Jin S, Li E, et al. The neurotoxic effect of astrocytes activated with toll-like receptor ligands. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2013;254(1-2):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Molina-Holgado E, Molina-Holgado F. Mending the broken brain: neuroimmune interactions in neurogenesis. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;114(5):1277–1290. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gadient RA, Otten UH. Interleukin-6 (IL-6)—a molecule with both beneficial and destructive potentials. Progress in Neurobiology. 1997;52(5):379–390. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00021-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bauer S. Cytokine control of adult neural stem cells: chronic versus acute exposure. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1153:48–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03986.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oshima T, Lee S, Sato A, Oda S, Hirasawa H, Yamashita T. TNF-α contributes to axonal sprouting and functional recovery following traumatic brain injury. Brain Research. 2009;1290:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wheeler D, Knapp E, Bandaru VVR, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α-induced neutral sphingomyelinase-2 modulates synaptic plasticity by controlling the membrane insertion of NMDA receptors. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2009;109(5):1237–1249. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06038.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rainey-Smith SR, Andersson DA, Williams RJ, Rattray M. Tumour necrosis factor alpha induces rapid reduction in AMPA receptor-mediated calcium entry in motor neurones by increasing cell surface expression of the GluR2 subunit: relevance to neurodegeneration. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;113(3):692–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang S, Zeng X, Yang H, Hu G, He S. Mast cell tryptase induces microglia activation via protease-activated receptor 2 signaling. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012;29(5-6):931–940. doi: 10.1159/000171029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mueller FJ, McKercher SR, Imitola J, et al. At the interface of the immune system and the nervous system: how neuroinflammation modulates the fate of neural progenitors in vivo. Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop. 2005;(53):83–114. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27626-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Greenwood SM, Bushell TJ. Astrocytic activation and an inhibition of MAP kinases are required for proteinase-activated receptor-2-mediated protection from neurotoxicity. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;113(6):1471–1480. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li R, Reiser G. Phosphorylation of Ser45 and Ser59 of αb-crystallin and p38/extracellular regulated kinase activity determine αb-crystallin-mediated protection of rat brain astrocytes from C2-ceramide- and staurosporine-induced cell death. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2011;118(3):354–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hou CH, Tang CH, Hsu CJ, Hou SM, Liu JF. CCN4 induces IL-6 production through avb5 receptor, PI3K, Akt, and NF-kB singling pathway in human synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2013;15(1):p. R19. doi: 10.1186/ar4151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kang SS, Keasey MP, Cai J, Hagg T. Loss of neuron-astroglial interaction rapidly induces protective CNTF expression after stroke in mice. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32(27):9277–9287. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zala D, Bensadoun J, De Almeida LP, et al. Long-term lentiviral-mediated expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor in the striatum of Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Experimental Neurology. 2004;185(1):26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pun S, Santos AF, Saxena S, Xu L, Caroni P. Selective vulnerability and pruning of phasic motoneuron axons in motoneuron disease alleviated by CNTF. Nature Neuroscience. 2006;9(3):408–419. doi: 10.1038/nn1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Simon CM, Jablonka S, Ruiz R, Tabares L, Sendtner M. Ciliary neurotrophic factor-induced sprouting preserves motor function in a mouse model of mild spinal muscular atrophy. Human Molecular Genetics. 2009;19(6):973–986. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp562.ddp562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gomes FC, Sousa Vde O, Romão L. Emerging roles for TGF-beta1 in nervous system development. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2005;23(5):413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Romão LF, De Sousa VO, Neto VM, Gomes FCA. Glutamate activates GFAP gene promoter from cultured astrocytes through TGF-β1 pathways. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2008;106(2):746–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Garcia CM, Darland DC, Massingham LJ, D’Amore PA. Endothelial cell-astrocyte interactions and TGFβ are required for induction of blood-neural barrier properties. Developmental Brain Research. 2004;152(1):25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mediators of Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES