Abstract
Background and Purpose
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is caused by NOTCH3 gene mutations that result in vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) degeneration. Its distinctive feature by electron microscopy (EM) is granular osmiophilic material (GOM) detected in VSMC indentations and/or the extracellular space close to VSMCs. Reports of the sensitivity of EM in detecting GOM in biopsies from CADASIL patients are contradictory. We present data from 32 patients clinically suspected to have CADASIL and discuss the role of EM in its diagnosis in this retrospective study.
Methods
Skin, skeletal muscle, kidney and pericardial biopsies were examined by EM; the NOTCH3 gene was screened for mutations. Skin and muscle biopsies from 12 patients without neurological symptoms served as controls.
Results and Discussion
All GOM-positive patients exhibited NOTCH3 mutations and vice versa. This study i) confirms that EM is highly specific and sensitive for CADASIL diagnosis; ii) extends our knowledge of GOM distribution in tissues where it has never been described, e.g. pericardium; iii) documents a novel NOTCH3 mutation in exon 3; and iv) shows that EM analysis is critical to highlight the need for comprehensive NOTCH3 analysis. Our findings also confirm the genetic heterogeneity of CADASIL in a small Italian subpopulation and emphasize the difficulties in designing algorithms for molecular diagnosis.
Introduction
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic disorder caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene, which maps to chromosome 19 and encodes the transmembrane receptor NOTCH3 [1], [2]. The postnatal expression of the gene is mostly restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) of middle and small arteries and pericytes [1], [3]. The mutations are associated with accumulation of the NOTCH3 extracellular domain in the wall of small cerebral arteries, resulting in VSMC degeneration [4], [5], [6].
The disease is characterized by migraine, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and/or strokes, cognitive decline and psychiatric symptoms [7]. Typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are severe leukoencephalopathy frequently involving the temporal pole and the external capsule, lacunar lesions, and microbleeds [8], [9], [10]. Microscopic features are arterial wall fibrosis and thickening and alterations of smooth muscle cells, which eventually disappear. Electron microscopy (EM) shows deposits of granular osmiophilic material (GOM) in VSMC indentations or in the extracellular space in close vicinity to VSMCs [11], [12], [13]. Even though GOM was originally described in the CNS, it is now accepted that CADASIL is a systemic disease [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]; accordingly, GOM has also been identified in skin and muscle biopsies [4], [18], [19]. Over the past 12 years we had the opportunity to examine skin and muscle biopsies from several patients suspected to have CADASIL. In one patient GOM was found in the pericardium, a tissue where it had never been described before. This study presents the findings obtained in a series of 32 patients and discusses the role of EM in CADASIL diagnosis. Our findings highlight the diagnostic value of EM in patients with clinical and MRI findings strongly suggestive of CADASIL but not showing the more common NOTCH3 mutations in earlier analyses and provide additional information on the syndrome.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Università Politecnica delle Marche Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and is recorded on file. The procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Patients
The study includes 32 individuals (14 men and 18 women) with a suspected clinical diagnosis of CADASIL; their age ranged from 29 to 74 years (mean 51 years).
The suspicion was based on a family history compatible with an autosomal dominant inheritance, MRI findings suggestive for multiple cerebral infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (involving in particular the temporal pole and/or the external capsule), and clinical findings such as recurrent TIA or stroke, cognitive defects, epilepsy, migraine and psychiatric symptoms.
Samples were collected over a period of 12 years (2001–2012).
Given the existence in the area of a strong Electron Microscopy Unit and the difficulty to obtain a genetic analysis, especially in the earlier years of the study, ultrastructural examination of skin and muscle biopsies was the first approach to the diagnosis. In 27 patients molecular analysis of the NOTCH3 gene was done soon after the EM report; in 4 patients (#1, #2 and #3 belonging to the same family, and #6; see Table 1) it was performed many years after the EM study; and in the last patient (#10; Table 1) it actually preceded it.
Table 1. Genetic findings detected in GOM-positive patients suspected to have CADASIL.
Pt # | Gender | Age/years | Sample | GOM | Mutation in | Amino acid change |
*1 | M | 51 | skeletal muscle | + | exon 3 | C108Sa |
*2 | M | 57 | skin | + | exon 3 | C108Sa |
*3 | F | 50 | skeletal muscle | + | exon 3 | C108Sa |
4 | M | 45 | skin and kidney | + | exon 19 | R1006C |
5 | F | 64 | skin | + | exon 2 | R54C |
6 | M | 47 | skin | + | exon 10 | G528C |
7 | M | 53 | skin | + | exon 10 | G528C |
8 | M | 48 | skeletal muscle | + | exon 10 | G528C |
9 | F | 46 | skin | + | exon 3 | R110C |
10 | F | 56 | pericardium | + | exon 10 | G528C |
11 | M | 59 | skin | + | exon 4 | R141C |
12 | F | 54 | skin | + | exon 10 | G528C |
13 | M | 54 | skin | + | exon 6 | R332C |
Pt: patient.
Patients from the same family (siblings).
+ presence of GOM.
Unpublished mutation.
A punch skin (n = 23) or a muscle biopsy (n = 4) was provided in 27 cases; a pericardial tissue fragment obtained during open heart surgery for valve replacement was available for one patient (#10; Table 1); both skin and muscle biopsies were available for 3 more patients, and a skin and a kidney biopsy were provided for the last (#4; Table 1). Muscle (#1 and #3) or skin (#2) was examined in the 3 siblings (Table 1). Skin (n = 9) and muscle biopsies (n = 3) from 12 patients (6 men and 6 women, age range: 35–75 years, mean 55.3) without neurological symptoms were used as negative controls for EM. They suffered from mycosis fungoides (n = 4), autoimmune disease (n = 4), Stevens-Johnson syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, leishmaniasis, and Milker's nodule (one case each).
Electron microscopy
All samples were fixed in 2% glutaraldeyde/2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, postfixed in buffered osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded alcohols, and embedded in an Epon-Araldite mixture. Semithin sections were cut and stained with toluidine blue to select arteries of appropriate size for thin sectioning. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate and examined with a CM10 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The sample was considered adequate when it contained at least five arteries with multiple VSMC layers and the inner elastic lamina [20]. More than one thin section per patient often had to be examined to achieve a sufficient number of vessels.
NOTCH3 gene analysis
Molecular analysis of the NOTCH3 gene was performed according to a previously described protocol [21]. Briefly, genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes with the MagNA Pure LC DNA isolation kit by an automated nucleic acid extractor (MagNA Pure extractor, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). DNA was amplified by PCR to screen the exons containing EGF-like repeats (exons 2–23) and exons 24 and 25. In the earlier years of the study the diagnostic protocol envisaged the search for mutations only in exons 3 and 4, where most CADASIL mutations have been reported; in 2005 screening was extended to all exons containing EGF-like repeats and to exons 24 and 25. The PCR products were directly sequenced for both sense and antisense strands using an automated fluorescent sequencing method (Big Dye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) after treatment with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (ExoSap-IT, USB Corporation, Staufen, Germany). The sequences of the PCR products were aligned with the published human NOTCH3 DNA sequence to identify any sequence changes using the SeqScape software (Applied Biosystems).
Results
GOM was found in 13 patients, 8 men and 5 women (including the 3 siblings) aged 45 to 64 years (mean 52.5), who were strongly suspected to have CADASIL. GOM was identified in 9 skin, 3 muscle, 1 kidney and 1 pericardial tissue biopsy (Table 1). There were no differences in GOM location or distribution between the analysed tissues. GOM was found at extracellular sites, most often near VSMC indentations or close to VSMCs of small and medium-sized arteries (Fig. 1). In patient #12 the VSMC indentations were very irregular and formed cytoplasmic pseudoinclusions containing GOM (Fig. 2). Occasionally, GOM was also detected in capillaries, where it was predominantly located very close to pericytes (Fig. 3), and in vein walls (not shown). The indented cytoplasmic membrane of smooth muscle cells and pericytes showed numerous pinocytotic vesicles in proximity of the GOM deposits (Fig. 4). Besides GOM, vessel walls frequently exhibited abnormalities such as smooth muscle cell degeneration and cell loss, thickening of the basal membrane, and abnormal endothelium due to the presence of vacuoles, which have all been described in CADASIL patients. Very few arteries containing GOM exhibited mild wall changes. No distinctive ultrastructural abnormalities were shared by the three siblings (#1, #2 and #3) or set them apart from the other patients, demonstrating that qualitative or semi-quantitative changes in GOM do not correlate with age. In patient #4 (skin+kidney biopsy) the skin sample showed abundant GOM, and molecular analysis disclosed the R1006C CADASIL mutation in exon 19 of the NOTCH3 gene. In the kidney biopsy, obtained at a later time due to renal symptoms, light microscopy showed slight, non-specific glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury and homogeneous thickening of the wall of small arteries. Immunofluorescence microscopy for immune complexes was negative. Moreover EM disclosed GOM in interlobular and juxtaglomerular arteries. This case has already been reported [22].
A NOTCH3 gene mutation was found in all 13 GOM-positive patients (Table 1). However, no genotype-phenotype correlations were found in this group. Genetic analysis of the samples from the three siblings became possible 12 years after the EM study. All three showed a novel mutation in exon 3 of the NOTCH3 gene, a nucleotide substitution c.322T>A involving a pathogenic substitution of a cysteine with a serine at codon 108 (p.C108S). In patient #6 genetic analysis, carried out soon after the skin biopsy, was directed only at exon 3 and 4 mutations and was negative. The EM data prompted further NOTCH3 gene screening (exons 2–24), which documented a mutation in exon 10.
Granular debris, not GOM, was found in the other 19 patients, 6 men and 13 women aged 29 to 74 years (mean 50.2 years). Frequently detected in the inner elastic lamina or near VSMCs in arterial walls, it was organized as small clumps and may conceivably derive from degenerated cells. Granular debris found in a biopsy submitted to confirm the clinical suspicion of CADASIL is a potential source of error. Comprehensive testing for NOTCH3 gene mutations was negative in all these 19 patients; their clinical follow-up was consistent with the EM and genetic findings, supporting the exclusion of CADASIL.
The 12 patients without neurological symptoms, included as controls, were negative for GOM as well as for NOTCH3 mutations.
Discussion
In all 32 patients biopsies were collected as part of the initial diagnostic work-up due to the difficulty in obtaining genetic analysis, especially in the earlier years of the study. At our integrated University-Hospital institution EM examination has been performed for more than 35 years to support a variety of diagnoses including skin, kidney and muscle diseases, an approach that has helped to create a remarkable expertise in these fields of pathology.
GOM was found in all tissue samples from our patients, i.e. skin, muscle, kidney and pericardium, confirming that CADASIL is a systemic vascular syndrome and that it may exceptionally be associated with renal disease [13], [22], [23], [24], [25].
Identification of GOM in three siblings led to extensive genetic testing and identification of a previously unreported mutation, which adds to the complexity of the NOTCH3 gene variation database [26].
Our data confirm the high sensitivity of EM for CADASIL diagnosis described in previous studies [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. In particular, they agree with the results reported by Tikka et al. [26], who identified GOM in all their 131 mutation-positive cases. Even though the present study involved a much smaller sample, it is worth noting that all patients but one were from a small area in central Italy (population about 700,000), whereas the 131 patients of Tikka et al. [26] came from an area encompassing Finland (n = 38), Sweden (n = 13) and France (n = 80).
Confirmation of the view of Mayer et al. [28] that skin biopsies are as reliable as muscle biopsies for CADASIL diagnosis was an additional finding. Moreover, we detected GOM in the pericardium; to the best of our knowledge this is the first report in this tissue, since GOM has only been described in myocardium [31].
Not all researchers consider EM as a sensitive method for CADASIL diagnosis [20], [32]. In particular, Malandrini et al. [32] reported a sensitivity as low as 57%, which they attributed to the difficulty of examining a sufficient number of arteries in skin biopsies and to the variable involvement of extracerebral vessels. Based on our experience, the sensitivity of the technique is influenced by EM operator skills in identifying GOM and in distinguishing it from similar but unrelated deposits. To avoid error it is essential to adhere strictly to current guidelines for GOM identification [11], [13]. Furthermore, examination of an adequate number of medium and small arteries is mandatory. Even though GOM was detected in the first or the first two arteries from all 13 GOM-positive patients, we agree with Markus et al. [20] that a minimum of five arteries should be examined in each patient. Based on this criterion patients with NOTCH3 mutations overlapped with GOM-positive ones.
Immunohistochemistry has been proposed by Joutel et al. [33] to be a reliable and readily available tool for CADASIL diagnosis, and to have a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100%; in contrast Lesnik Oberstein et al. [34] reported a large number of false-negative and even false-positive results in a study of 62 patients.
After EM detection of GOM and negative testing for the more common NOTCH3 mutations comprehensive NOTCH3 screening should be performed. Testing only exons 3 and 4, as suggested by Kalimo et al. [35], would have identified the mutations in only 30% of our patients. These data agree with previous reports showing that mutations in exons 3 and 4 account for only 36% of Italian CADASIL patients [36] and disclosing the genetic heterogeneity of CADASIL in a small Italian subpopulation [37]. Our GOM-positive patient #6 is a case in point, because complete sequencing of the gene, 11 years after biopsy examination and negative testing for exon 3 and 4 mutations, identified a mutation in exon 10.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our study confirms previous observations and extends our knowledge of GOM distribution in tissues where it has never been described before, such as pericardium. Moreover, we report a novel NOTCH3 mutation in exon 3, detected in three siblings. Our findings also confirm the genetic heterogeneity of CADASIL in a small Italian subpopulation, emphasizing the difficulties in designing algorithms for molecular diagnosis. Finally, our data support the notion that EM analysis is critical to highlight the need for screening NOTCH3 exons 2–24.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Maria Cristina Zingaretti, Plinio Ferrara, and Michela Cardinali for their technical assistance and to Dr S. Modena (www.silviamodena.com) for the language revision.
Funding Statement
The study was supported by a grant from Università Politecnica delle Marche (2011 FAR, formerly 60%) to M.M. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Joutel A, Corpechot C, Ducros A, Vahedi K, Chabriat H, et al. (1996) Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature 383: 707–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Tournier-Lasserve E, Joutel A, Melki J, Weissenbach J, Lathrop GM, et al. (1993) Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy maps to chromosome 19q12. Nat Genet 3: 256–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Joutel A, Vahedi K, Corpechot C, Troesch A, Chabriat H, et al. (1997) Strong clustering and stereotyped nature of Notch3 mutations in CADASIL patients. Lancet 350: 1511–1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Brulin P, Godfraind C, Leteurtre E, Ruchoux MM (2002) Morphometric analysis of ultrastructural vascular changes in CADASIL: analysis of 50 skin biopsy specimens and pathogenic implications. Acta Neuropathol 104: 241–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Joutel A, Andreux F, Gaulis S, Domenga V, Cécillon M, et al. (2000) The ectodomain of the Notch3 receptor accumulates within the cerebrovasculature of CADASIL patients. J Clin Invest 105: 597–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Joutel A (2011) Pathogenesis of CADASIL: transgenic and knock-out mice to probe function and dysfunction of the mutated gene, Notch3, in the cerebrovasculature. Bioessays 33: 73–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chabriat H, Vahedi K, Iba-Zizen MT, Joutel A, Nibbio A, et al. (1995) Clinical spectrum of CADASIL: a study of 7 families. Lancet 346: 934–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chabriat H, Levy C, Taillia H, Iba-Zizen MT, Vahedi K, et al. (1998) Patterns of MRI lesions in CADASIL. Neurology 51: 452–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Dichgans M, Holtmannspötter M, Herzog J, Peters N, Bergmann M, et al. (2002) Cerebral microbleeds in CADASIL: a gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and autopsy study. Stroke 33: 67–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. van Den Boom R, Lesnik Oberstein SA, van Duinen SG, Bornebroek M, Ferrari MD, et al. (2002) Subcortical lacunar lesions: an MR imaging finding in patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Radiology 224: 791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Baudrimont M, Dubas F, Joutel A, Tournier-Lasserve E, Bousser MG (1993) Autosomal dominant leukoencephalopathy and subcortical ischemic stroke. A clinicopathological study. Stroke 24: 122–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Miao Q, Paloneva T, Tuominen S, Pöyhönen M, Tuisku S, et al. (2004) Fibrosis and stenosis of the long penetrating cerebral arteries: the cause of the white matter pathology in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Brain Pathol 14: 358–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ruchoux MM, Guerouaou D, Vandenhaute B, Pruvo JP, Vermersch P, et al. (1995) Systemic vascular smooth muscle cell impairment in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol 89: 500–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Goebel HH, Meyermann R, Rosin R, Schlote W (1997) Characteristic morphologic manifestation of CADASIL, cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, in skeletal muscle and skin. Muscle Nerve 20: 625–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Haritoglou C, Hoops JP, Stefani FH, Mehraein P, Kampik A, et al. (2004) Histopathological abnormalities in ocular blood vessels of CADASIL patients. Am J Ophthalmol 138: 302–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rubio A, Rifkin D, Powers JM, Patel U, Stewart J, et al. (1997) Phenotypic variability of CADASIL and novel morphologic findings. Acta Neuropathol 94: 247–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schröder JM, Sellhaus B, Jörg J (1995) Identification of the characteristic vascular changes in a sural nerve biopsy of a case with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Acta Neuropathol 89: 116–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ruchoux MM, Chabriat H, Bousser MG, Baudrimont M, Tournier-Lasserve E (1994) Presence of ultrastructural arterial lesions in muscle and skin vessels of patients with CADASIL. Stroke 25: 2291–2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ruchoux MM, Maurage CA (1998) Endothelial changes in muscle and skin biopsies in patients with CADASIL. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 24: 60–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Markus HS, Martin RJ, Simpson MA, Dong YB, Ali N, et al. (2002) Diagnostic strategies in CADASIL. Neurology 59: 1134–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cappelli A, Ragno M, Cacchiò G, Scarcella M, Staffolani P, et al. (2009) High recurrence of the R1006C NOTCH3 mutation in central Italian patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Neurosci Lett 462: 176–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ragno M, Trojano L, Pianese L, Boni MV, Silvestri S, et al. (2012) Renal involvement in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL): report of a case with a six-year follow-up. Histol Histopathol 27: 1307–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bergmann M, Ebke M, Yuan Y, Brück W, Mugler M, et al. (1996) Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL): a morphological study of a German family. Acta Neuropathol 92: 341–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guerrot D, François A, Boffa JJ, Boulos N, Hanoy M, et al. (2008) Nephroangiosclerosis in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy: is NOTCH3 mutation the common culprit? Am J Kidney Dis 52: 340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kusaba T, Hatta T, Kimura T, Sonomura K, Tanda S, et al. (2007) Renal involvement in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Clin Nephrol 67: 182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tikka S, Mykkänen K, Ruchoux MM, Bergholm R, Junna M, et al. (2009) Congruence between NOTCH3 mutations and GOM in 131 CADASIL patients. Brain 132: 933–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ebke M, Dichgans M, Bergmann M, Voelter HU, Rieger P, et al. (1997) CADASIL: skin biopsy allows diagnosis in early stages. Acta Neurol Scand 95: 351–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mayer M, Straube A, Bruening R, Uttner I, Pongratz D, et al. (1999) Muscle and skin biopsies are a sensitive diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of CADASIL. J Neurol 246: 526–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rein Gustavsen W, Reinholt FP, Schlosser A (2006) Skin biopsy findings and results of neuropsychological testing in the first confirmed cases of CADASIL in Norway. Eur J Neurol 13: 359–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wang Z, Yuan Y, Zhang W, Lv H, Hong D, et al. (2011) NOTCH3 mutations and clinical features in 33 mainland Chinese families with CADASIL. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82: 534–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lesnik Oberstein SA, Jukema JW, van Duinen SG, Macfarlane PW, van Houwelingen HC, et al. (2003) Myocardial infarction in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Medicine (Baltimore) 82: 251–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Malandrini A, Gaudiano C, Gambelli S, Berti G, Serni G, et al. (2007) Diagnostic value of ultrastructural skin biopsy studies in CADASIL. Neurology 68: 1430–1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Joutel A, Favrole P, Labauge P, Chabriat H, Lescoat C, et al. (2001) Skin biopsy immunostaining with a Notch3 monoclonal antibody for CADASIL diagnosis. Lancet 358: 2049–2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lesnik Oberstein SA, van Duinen SG, van den Boom R, Maat-Schieman ML, van Buchem MA, et al. (2003) Evaluation of diagnostic NOTCH3 immunostaining in CADASIL. Acta Neuropathol 106: 107–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kalimo H, Ruchoux MM, Viitanen M, Kalaria RN (2002) CADASIL: a common form of hereditary arteriopathy causing brain infarcts and dementia. Brain Pathol 12: 371–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dotti MT, Federico A, Mazzei R, Bianchi S, Scali O, et al. (2005) The spectrum of Notch3 mutations in 28 Italian CADASIL families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76: 736–738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Testi S, Malerba G, Ferrarini M, Ragno M, Pradotto L, et al. (2012) Mutational and haplotype map of NOTCH3 in a cohort of Italian patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). J Neurol Sci 319: 37–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]