Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 18.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2012 Jun;42(6):1477–1487. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141642

Protection of Irf5-deficient mice from pristane-induced lupus involves altered cytokine production and class switching

Di Feng 1,2, Lisong Yang 1,2, Xiaohui Bi 1,2, Rivka C Stone 1,2, Priya Patel 2, Betsy J Barnes 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3684952  NIHMSID: NIHMS460927  PMID: 22678902

Summary

Polymorphisms in the transcription factor interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) have been identified that show strong association with increased risk of developing the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A potential pathologic role for IRF5 in SLE development is supported by the fact that increased IRF5 mRNA and protein abundance are observed in primary blood cells of SLE patients that correlate with increased risk of developing the disease. Here, we demonstrate that IRF5 is required for pristane-induced SLE via its ability to control multiple facets of autoimmunity. We show that IRF5 has a distinct influence on pathological hypergammaglobulinemia and provide evidence for its role in regulating IgG1 class switching and antigen specificity. Examination of in vivo cytokine expression (and autoantibody production) identified an imbalance in Irf5−/− mice favoring Th2 polarization. In addition, we provide clear evidence that loss of Irf5 significantly weakens the in vivo type I IFN signature critical for disease pathogenesis in this model of murine lupus. Together, these findings demonstrate the global effect that IRF5 has on autoimmunity and provides significant new insight into how overexpression of IRF5 in blood cells of SLE patients may contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Keywords: interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5, IRF-5); systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); autoantibody; type I interferon; Th2

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting multiple organs and is characterized by a type I interferon (IFN) gene signature, the production of autoantibodies, and subsequent development of glomerulonephritis [1]. Although the underlying etiology of SLE remains obscure, several lines of evidence document a complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors [1-3]. Results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a number of SLE susceptibility genes [2-5]. With the availability of numerous models of experimental murine lupus, we can begin to elucidate their contribution(s) to SLE pathogenesis [5].

The transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) is one SLE susceptibility gene recently identified [6]. Multiple studies have confirmed the presence of IRF5 genetic variants that show strong association with increased risk of developing SLE [6-8]. Association has been convincingly replicated in SLE patients from multiple populations and distinct IRF5 haplotypes that confer either susceptibility to (risk), or protection from, SLE in persons of varying ethnic ancestry have been identified [6-11]. A potential biologic role for IRF5 in human SLE pathogenesis has been supported by the fact that elevated IRF5 mRNA levels are associated with specific IRF5 risk variants [7, 8, 12, 13]. Subsequently, we demonstrated that IRF5 mRNA and protein abundance were significantly elevated in primary blood cells of SLE patients, as compared to healthy donors, independent of IRF5 risk variants; however, a correlation between IRF5 expression and the IRF5 risk haplotype was obtained [14]. These data support a more global role for IRF5 in SLE pathogenesis that is both genotype-dependent and -independent. IRF5 regulates type I IFN expression in response to a variety of pathogenic stimuli and is a critical mediator of MyD88-dependent Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling [15-18]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines elevated in the serum of lupus patients, i.e. IFN-α, IL-6, IL-12, and TNF-α, are regulated by IRF5 [16]. In mice, the production of IFN-α/β and IL-6 in response to sera or IgG-RNA immune complexes (IC) from lupus patients was shown to be Tlr7-, Irf5- and Irf7-dependent [19]. These data support the conventional wisdom that elevated IRF5 expression in SLE patients may drive disease development by causing aberrant production of type I IFN through TLR7 and/or TLR9 signaling that is activated by IC [20, 21]. Correlative data supporting this has been obtained in SLE patients demonstrating association of an IRF5 risk haplotype with IFN-α activity that was dependent on autoantibodies [22].

Recently, it was demonstrated that FcRIIb−/− and FcRIIb−/−Yaa mice lacking Irf5 had significantly decreased autoantibody production, limited glomerular IgG deposition, and enhanced survival [23]. Little mechanistic insight was provided for the protective Irf5−/− phenotype. A subsequent study demonstrated that IRF5 regulates transcription of the γ2a locus resulting in decreased autoantibody production [24]. Surprisingly, neither study directly addressed whether loss of Irf5 affected type I IFN expression [23, 24]. We hypothesized that loss of Irf5 would alter multiple aspects of autoimmunity due to its regulation of the pleiotropic cytokine type I IFN and other proinflammatory cytokines [15-18]. The 2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane (pristane)-induced lupus model displays many key immunologic and clinical features of human SLE, including production of autoantibodies against dsDNA and small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs), a type I IFN signature, and the development of IC-mediated glomerulonephritis [25, 26]. This murine model is at present the only one reported to recapitulate the IFN signature in peripheral blood (PB) and, similar to its proposed role in human SLE, IFN signaling is required for the production of pathogenic autoantibodies and glomerulonephritis [25]. As such, we assessed changes in immune status associated with Irf5 loss in this model.

Results

Irf5 is required for production of IgG lupus-associated autoantibodies but not IgM

Autoantibodies directed against nuclear components, such as DNA/protein or RNA/protein macromolecular complexes, are a diagnostic feature of SLE and contribute to disease pathogenesis [1]. Pristane induces production of lupus autoantibodies ~4-6 month post-peritoneal injection [27]. At 10 months post-injection, Savitsky et al. reported a decrease in antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) in the sera of pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice that was in part due to a decrease in anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm IgG2a and IgG2b lupus autoantibodies [24]. We observed a similar decrease in sera ANAs 6 months post-injection by HEp-2 immunostaining (Fig. 1A); 10 out of 12 Irf5−/− mice had no detectable ANA staining while the remaining 2 lacked cytoplasmic staining and gave weak positive homogenous nuclear staining (data not shown). To extend upon the repertoire of lupus autoantibodies that may be affected by loss of Irf5, we analyzed additional autoantibodies (anti-Ribosomal Phosphoprotein P0 (-RiboP0), anti-U1A, anti-small nuclear RNP BB’ (RNP BB’), and anti-histone) that are present in pristane-induced SLE [25, 28]. This analysis confirmed a marked reduction in IgG autoantibody levels of Irf5−/− mice targeted against a variety of autoantigens (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, we show that IgM autoantibodies are unaffected by loss of Irf5.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

IRF5 is required for pristane-induced IgG autoantibody production. A, ANA in sera obtained from twelve Irf5−/− and Irf5+/+ littermate mice 6 months post-pristane injection was assayed by fluorescent immunostaining of Hep2 cells. A representative positive section from each genotype is shown; ten out of twelve Irf5−/− mice were negative for ANA. Bar = 20 μM. B, Serum IgG and IgM autoantibody concentrations from pristane (PZ)-injected Irf5+/+ (WT; black bar; n=13) and Irf5−/− (KO; white bar; n=10), and PBS (Ctl)-injected WT (n=6) and KO (n=5) mice 6 months post-injection. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test.

Irf5−/− mice lack IgG2a production and drive IgG1 class switching

Pristane-induced lupus is associated with hypergammaglobulinemia and marked polyclonal B cell activation [29]. In mice, IgG2a/c autoantibodies are considered to be the most pathogenic, while IgG1 displays the poorest pathogenicity [30]. Of the total sera IgG produced in response to pristane, IgG2a/c predominates, with relatively smaller differences observed in IgG1 levels between pristane- and PBS-injected mice [31]. Examination of total serum IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2a/c, IgG2b and IgG3) in wild-type and Irf5−/− mice revealed significant decreases in both IgG2a/c and IgG2b levels of Irf5-deficient mice; in addition, we observed a striking increase in IgG1 levels of Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 2A). The decrease in total IgG2a/c and IgG2b levels correlated with significant decreases in specific lupus autoantibodies (Suppl Fig. 1A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

IRF5 controls pathogenic isotype in pristane-induced hypergammaglobulinemia. A, Serum IgG isotype concentrations from pristane-injected Irf5+/+ (WT; black bar; n=12) and Irf5−/− (KO; white bar; n=12), and PBS-injected WT (n=5) and KO (n=5) mice 6 months post-injection at 1:100,000 serum dilution. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p<0.05 by Student’s t test. B, TLR7-associated serum IgG1 autoantibodies are decreased in Irf5−/− mice. Serum from pristane-injected Irf5+/+ (WT; black bar; n=10) and Irf5−/− mice (KO; white bar; n=10), and PBS-injected WT (n=4) and KO (n=5) mice 6 months post-injection were measured for IgG1 antibodies. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test.

Irf5 regulates antigen-specific IgG1 following pristane injection

T cells are required for IgG1 and IgG2a/c hypergammaglobulinemia in pristane-injected mice [33]. While data in Fig. 2A reveal that Irf5−/− mice produce robust levels of IgG1 indicating that Irf5−/− T cells are capable of supporting the generation of IgG1 hypergammaglobulinemia, the ability of Irf5−/− mice to generate antigen-specific IgG1 is inconclusive. Lien et al. recently showed that Irf5−/− mice were impaired in their generation of antigen-specific IgG1 by T cell-dependent or -independent adjuvants [34]. A similar analysis revealed contrasting data demonstrating increased antigen-specific IgG1 production from Irf5−/− mice [24].

To clarify the role of IRF5 in generating antigen-specific IgG1 and to determine whether the observed increase in IgG1 hypergammaglobulinemia in Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 2A) results in elevated IgG1 autoantibody production, we analyzed autoantibody isotypes in Irf5+/+ and Irf5−/− mice 6 months post-pristane injection. As expected, IgG2a/c and IgG2b autoantibodies against dsDNA, RiboP0, U1A, U1B’/B were absent or significantly reduced in pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice (Suppl. Fig. 1 and data not shown). Similarly, serum anti-RiboP0 and anti-U1A IgG1 levels were significantly reduced in Irf5−/− mice, whereas anti-dsDNA IgG1 autoantibodies were similar between Irf5+/+ and Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 2B). Given that Irf5−/− mice have intact IgG1 class switching, the impaired production of certain IgG1 autoantibodies in this model of murine lupus supports the existence of a mechanism(s) other than class switching for the regulation of IgG1 autoantibodies by IRF5. Furthermore, the reduction in IgG1 anti-U1A, but not dsDNA, autoantibodies indicate that the TLR7-IRF5 axis is important for the development of pristane-induced autoantibodies and controls autoantibody specificity.

Pristane induces Th2 polarization in Irf5−/− mice

T helper (Th) 1 and Th2 cells promote the production of IgG2a/c and IgG1, respectively; Th1-mediated autoimmune responses generate the more pathogenic autoantibodies and are thus associated with the progression of murine lupus [35]. Imbalance of Th1 and Th2 cytokine homeostasis is a prominent feature of both experimental and human SLE [36, 37]. Given that IRF5 has been linked to proinflammatory cytokine expression [17], and several cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10, are known to promote antibody production [39-43], serum cytokine levels in PBS- and pristane-injected Irf5+/+ and Irf5−/− littermates were measured using the MILLIPLEX mouse kit. As early as 2 weeks post-injection, serum levels of the Th2 cytokine IL-10 were significantly elevated in Irf5−/− mice compared to Irf5+/+ mice (Fig. 3A); 6 months post-injection, only Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 were upregulated (Fig. 3B). There was no difference in serum levels of the Th1 cytokine IL-12p40 (Fig. 3C). As expected, serum levels of IL-6 were decreased in Irf5−/− mice, whereas TNF-α levels remained unchanged between wild-type and Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 3C). The increase in serum Th2 cytokines may contribute to disease protection in Irf5−/− mice since Th2 cells promote production of the least pathogenic IgG1 isotype [35] observed in Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 2A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Th2 polarization in Irf5-deficient mice. A, Decreased IL-10 production in Irf5−/− mice. Cytokine expression in the serum of Irf5−/− (KO; n=6) and Irf5+/+ (WT; n=5) mice was analyzed 2 weeks post-pristane injection using the Multiplex cytokine assay. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test. B and C, Same as in A except serum cytokine levels were measured 6 months after PBS (n>6 per group) or pristane (WT, n=16; KO, n=15) injection. *p<0.05; **p<0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test.

To address whether T cells from pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice are capable of producing Th2 cytokines, PMA/ionomycin-stimulated splenocytes from Irf5+/+ and Irf5−/− littermate mice 6 months post-injection were surface-stained with CD4 antibodies followed by intracellular staining for IL-4 and IFN-γ. Our results demonstrate that CD4+ T cells from Irf5+/+ mice produce negligible amounts of IL-4; in contrast, a fraction of CD4+ T cells from Irf5−/− mice produced IL-4 (Fig. 4A). Both Th1 (IFN-γ+ IL-4) and Th2 (IFN-γ IL-4+) cells, but not Th0 (IFN-γ+ IL-4+), exist in Irf5−/− mice, whereas only Th1 cells could be detected in Irf5+/+ mice. The frequency of IFN-γ producing CD4 T cells from Irf5−/− mice was comparable to those from Irf5+/+ (Fig. 4A). Together, these data support a critical role for IRF5 in the regulation of Th1/Th2 polarization contributing to pristane-induced lupus pathogenesis. Since IFN-γ production was not impaired in T cells from Irf5−/− mice, the emergence of Th2 T cells in Irf5−/− mice is not solely due to a lack of Th1 polarization in this model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Intracellular IL-4 is upregulated in CD4+ T cells of pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice. A, Representative flow cytometric analysis of IL-4 and IFN-γ intracellular expression by splenic CD4+ T cells from Irf5+/+ (WT) and Irf5−/− mice 6 months post-pristane injection (left panels). Quantification of the percentage of CD4+ T cells from WT (n=5) and KO (n=5) mice expressing IFN-γ or IL-4 (right panels). Data are presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.01 by Student’s t test. B, IRF5 controls early activation of T cells. Representative flow cytometric analysis of splenic T cells (left panels). Quantification of CD4+CD69+ T cells from n=5 mice per group (right panel). Data are presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.01 by Student’s t test.

Irf5 is required for early T cell activation

In SLE, activated T and B cells can infiltrate tissues to cause organ damage. Recent data in the Yaa murine lupus model [23] indicated that IRF5 was critical for T cell activation. In a similar manner, we investigated whether loss of Irf5 affects lymphocyte activation. At 6 months post-pristane, we found that expression of the early activation marker CD69, in splenic CD4+ T cells of Irf5−/− mice, was significantly reduced (Fig. 4B).

Loss of type I IFN signature in pristane-induced Irf5−/− mice

Because IRF5 regulates type I IFN production [15, 44] and type I IFN signaling is central to the pathogenesis of pristane-induced SLE [25], we examined the contribution of IRF5 to pristane-induced type I IFN production. Levels of serum IFN were determined by the type I IFN reporter cell assay that measures the ability of sera to cause IFN-induced gene expression [45]. A significant decrease in mRNA levels of the IFN stimulated gene (ISG) IRF7 was observed in L929 cells stimulated with sera from pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice as compared to Irf5+/+ (Fig. 5A). No increase in surface expression of the ISG Sca-1 [46, 47] was observed on CD19+ B cells from the PB of Irf5−/− mice 2 weeks post-pristane injection (Fig. 5B). Similar results were found at 6 months post-injection in different cellular compartments of Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 5C) and decreased mRNA expression of the ISGs MCP-1 (ccl2) and MX1 (myxoma response protein) was also observed in the bone marrow (BM) of Irf5−/− mice (Suppl. Fig. 3).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Type I IFN gene signature induced by pristane is IRF5-dependent. A, Analysis of serum type I IFN activity. IRF7 mRNA expression in L929 reporter cells was determined after stimulation with sera from Irf5+/+ (WT; n=5) and Irf5−/− (KO; n=6) mice 2 weeks post-pristane injection. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. p value determined by Mann-Whitney U test. B, Representative flow cytometric analysis of Sca-1 surface expression on PBMC 2 weeks post-pristane injection. Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of Sca-1 on CD19+ cells is shown. C, Quantification of Sca-1 on B220+ B cells from PB (n=5 per group), BM and spleen (n=9 per group) of Irf5+/+ (WT) and Irf5−/− (KO) mice 6 months post-pristane injection. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p<0.01; *p=0.05 by Mann-Whitney U test. D, Q-PCR analysis of IRF7 and MX1 expression in purified peritoneal Ly6GCD11B+ monocytes (normalized to peritoneal cells from untreated mice) of Irf5+/+ (WT; n=3) and Irf5−/− (KO; n=3) mice 4 weeks after pristane injection. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p<0.05 by Student’s t test.

Ly6Chi monocytes, which are recruited rapidly to the peritoneal cavity (PC) in response to pristane, are thought to be the major source of type I IFN in this model [46]. As such, Ly6Chi monocytes were isolated from the PC [47] and Q-PCR performed to determine IRF7 and MX1 mRNA levels. Expression of IRF7 and MX1 were significantly decreased in Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 5D). Thus, we provide evidence to show that the IFN signature in pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice is greatly diminished, but not completely absent, at both acute (2 weeks) and chronic (6 months) stages of the disease suggesting yet another mechanism of protection for Irf5−/− mice.

Discussion

The findings presented here strongly support a multifaceted role for IRF5 in the regulation of autoimmunity. Consistent with recent reports [23], we show that IRF5 is required for the development of ANAs in response to pristane. We replicate the lack of IgG2a/c autoantibodies in pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice [24]; however, in addition, we found that a defect in IgG2a/c class switch recombination (CSR) is already present in naïve Irf5−/− mice (Suppl. Fig. 1B). A similar defect in the generation of IgG2a and 2b was shown in Tlr9- and Myd88-deficient FcγRIIB−/−.B6 lupus mice and T-bet-deficient MRL/lpr mice [48, 49]. These results implicate IRF5 as a critical factor regulating both basal and stimuli-induced IgG2a/c class switching. The finding that Irf5 is required for pristane-induced IgG2a/c and IgG2b hypergammaglobulinemia and not IgG1 hypergammaglobulinemia led us to examine whether the skewing of IgG isotypes was an intrinsic or extrinsic effect. Data from in vitro stimulations examining IgG1 class switching support a B cell intrinsic defect in Irf5−/− mice (Suppl. Fig. 2). Whether T cell intrinsic/extrinsic defects in Irf5−/− mice as well contribute to the overall skewing of IgG isotypes is not currently clear. Data from Savitsky et al.[24] suggest that in vitro T cell polarization is unaffected in Irf5−/− mice, while in vivo data presented here indicate impaired production of IL-4 in CD4+ T cells from pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 4A). Together, these data suggest a T cell extrinsic defect in Irf5−/− mice. Similar to findings by Richez et al.[23], we observed a defect in T cell activation in Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 4B). Additional studies are required to clarify the role of IRF5 in T cell polarization, activation, and function. Nevertheless, results from the present study suggest that dysregulation of IRF5 expression in human SLE is likely to affect both B and T cell function(s) ultimately contributing to pathogenic autoantibody production.

In animal models, TLR9 contributes to the development of anti-chromatin autoantibodies and TLR7 to the development of anti-RNP autoantibodies; MyD88 and a number of transcription factors including IRF5 mediate the effects of TLR7/9 engagement [50]. Our data indeed support a downstream role for IRF5 in both TLR pathways since Irf5-deficient mice are unable to generate TLR7- or TLR9-associated IgG2a autoantibodies (Suppl. Fig. 1A); however, they do not preclude a TLR-independent role for IRF5 in autoantibody production since antigen specificity could not be addressed by studying the IgG2a isotype. Indeed, a thorough analysis of non-isotype-specific autoantibodies in Irf5-deficient RII.Yaa mice led Richez et al. to suggest that IRF5 plays a nonredundant role in TLR7 and TLR9 signaling in SLE and/or contributes to autoantibody production independent of these two pathways [23]. In Irf5−/− and Irf5+/− RII.Yaa mice, all four IgG isotypes were dramatically decreased, whereas sera IgG1 levels in Irf5+/− RII mice were comparable to Irf5+/+ RII mice [23]. In the pristane-induced model of murine lupus, we found that Irf5−/− mice had only striking reductions in IgG2a/c and IgG2b antibody levels whereas IgG1 levels were elevated. These data suggest that a lack of Irf5 does not reduce long-lived IgG1 expressing plasma cells. After class switching, autoreactive B cells may undergo further selection and expansion. In order to address the role of IRF5 in selecting or expanding B cell clones with autoreactive specificity, we examined the production of antigen-specific IgG1. We found that Irf5−/− mice are deficient in their production of lupus IgG1 autoantibodies suggesting that a mechanism other than class switching regulates antigen specificity in these mice. Instead, IRF5 may be critical for selection or expansion of autoreactive clones from the B cell repertoire. The selective impairment of TLR7- and not TLR9-associated IgG1 autoantibody production indicates a distinct and likely more critical role for IRF5 in mediating TLR7 signaling in pristane-induced lupus. Whether this proves true in human SLE is not currently known.

CSR of B cells from IgM to IgG is dependent on the cognate interaction of B cells with Th cells [51]. Although CD40L-CD40 interaction is necessary to initiate Ab isotype switching [52], it is assumed that Th cell-derived cytokines determine whether B cells are switched to IgG1 or IgG2a [53]. IFN-γ and IL-4 are key cytokines of Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively, although IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 are also produced by Th2 cells. To determine whether the cytokine milieu in Irf5−/− mice contribute to their production (or inhibition) of IgG isotypes, we measured serum cytokine levels in response to pristane. The Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 were significantly upregulated in the serum of pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice; intracellular IL-4 was also elevated in CD4+ T cells from pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice (Fig. 4A). IL-4 and IL-5 have been shown to be protective against SLE in certain murine models [36, 54]. These data support a Th2 polarization in Irf5−/− mice that would be expected to drive IgG1 class switching. However, Th2 polarization does not necessarily entail inhibition of Th1 as Th1/Th2 coexist and tipping the balance one way or the other is all that may be required to affect a systemic autoimmune disease such as lupus [55, 56]. Indeed, we did not observe down-regulation of the key Th1 cytokine IFN-γ in T cells. Given that IgG2a/c CSR is induced by IFN-γ, and Irf5−/− mice make sufficient levels to induce IgG2a CSR (Fig. 4A), the inability of Irf5−/− mice to produce IgG2a/c autoantibodies in the presence of IFN-γ provides further support for an intrinsic defect in IgG2a/c CSR.

Other factors capable of regulating IgG class switching include IFN-α; IFN-α potently induces IgG2a and IgG3 [57]. The significant decrease in the type I IFN signature of pristane-injected Irf5−/− mice may also contribute to the loss of IgG2a class switching, although recent data suggests that exogenous type I IFN does not rescue the defect in IgG2a secretion in Irf5−/− B cells [24]. Previous studies on IFNAR−/− mice [23, 31] provide further support of differences in lupus development between Irf5−/− and IFNAR−/− mice. Pristane-injected IFNAR−/− mice retained positive ANA staining with a mean titer value lower than wild-type controls and equivalent IgG2a autoantibodies [31]. In the FcRIIb−/− murine lupus model, mice lacking Irf5 were completely protected from disease development while mice lacking IFNAR maintained a substantial level of residual disease [23]. These data support distinct phenotypic differences between Irf5−/− and IFNAR−/− mice suggesting that the role of IRF5 in lupus pathogenesis exceeds beyond its regulation of type I IFN production.

Interestingly, we also detected significantly elevated levels of IL-10 in the sera of Irf5−/− mice 2 weeks post-pristane injection (Fig. 3A). Given that IL-10 is a Th2 cytokine and downregulates IFN-α production [58, 59], early expression in Irf5−/− mice may indirectly contribute to reduction of the type I IFN signature. Recent data in human macrophages reveal that IL-10 is a direct target of IRF5 and overexpression of IRF5 represses IL-10 expression while M1 murine macrophages lacking Irf5 express elevated levels [60]. Although IRF5 has been shown to directly regulate type I IFN expression [15, 44], other indirect mechanisms via IRF5 may contribute to the downregulation of a type I IFN signature in pristane-induced lupus. With respect to serum IL-10 levels, our data suggests that two mechanisms exist that control the acute (2 weeks) and chronic (6 months) expression of type I IFNs in this model.

In summary, our study highlights the regulatory role of IRF5 in the onset of pathological hypergammaglobulinemia in pristane-induced lupus. We reveal that Irf5 is indispensable for the maintenance and production of IgG2a/c autoantibodies. In addition, we demonstrate that IRF5 regulates not only CSR, but also antigen specificity. We show that loss of Irf5 significantly alters cytokine production in response to pristane, ultimately skewing the cytokine (and autoantibody) profile towards a Th2-like response, and inhibits the type I IFN signature that is critical for disease pathogenesis in this model of lupus. Given the current data in human SLE and murine models of lupus [36, 37, 41], it would be expected that factors capable of regulating the Th1/Th2 balance would potentially alter lupus development. To this extent, we also provide evidence that T cell polarization is altered in Irf5−/− mice and that IRF5 has a critical role in T cell activation. These findings greatly extend our current, but limited understanding of the global effect that IRF5 has on autoimmunity and provides significant new insight into how overexpression of IRF5 in blood cells of SLE patients may contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Irf5−/− mice backcrossed eight generations to C57Bl/6 were obtained from T. Taniguchi (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) and T. Mak (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) [17]. Wild-type C57Bl/6 were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Back-crossed heterozygotes were intercrossed to obtain a cohort of Irf5+/+ and Irf5−/− littermates, by standard breeding techniques. Littermate Irf5+/+ mice were used as controls. Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School. Eight-week-old mice received a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 0.5 ml pristane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or PBS. Mice were sacrificed for tissue and blood at 6 months post-injection unless otherwise indicated.

Ig isotype detection

Nunc Maxisorp plates (Nalgene) were coated with 5 μg/ml goat anti-mouse Ig (heavy and light chain) antibody (Southern Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C. Coated wells were blocked with 3% BSA for 1 h and then diluted sera samples (1:100,000 for serum from pristane-injected mice; 1:1 for in vitro supernatants) in 3% FBS and 0.05% Tween-20 were added. After washing, 2 ug/ml of biotinylated rat anti-mouse isotype-specific antibodies (Biolegend, CA) were added and incubated for 1 h then 0.5 ug/ml avidin-conjugated HRP (Biolegend) was added for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After additional washing, 1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA (Thermo) was used for color development. All dilution buffers contained 3% BSA.

Autoantibody detection

For dsDNA, plates were coated with 0.01% (w/v) poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 min at RT followed by addition of 5 ug/ml ds plasmid DNA and incubated overnight at 4°C. For other types of ELISA, 1 μg/ml of antigen including U1A and RiboP (Diarect) were used to coat the plate overnight at 4°C. Sera were diluted 1:100 and incubated in the plate for 1 h at RT. Biotinylated rat anti-mouse isotype-specific antibodies (Biolegend) were then incubated for 1 h. As described previously, Avidin-conjugated HRP (Biolegend) was added for 30 min at RT, followed by 1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA. The method of Thibault et al. was used to detect IgG and IgM autoantibody levels [61].

Cell purification and class switching

Naïve B cells were negatively isolated from splenocytes using Miltenyi’s B cell isolation kit containing biotin-conjugated mAbs to CD43, CD4, and Ter-119 beads. B cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10% FBS and 50 μM β-ME. 2×105 B cells per well were seeded in 96-well plates and stimulated with 1 ug/ml Gardiquimod (Invivogen), 10 ug/ml anti-CD40 mAb (Biolegend) or in combination with 20 ng/ml IL4 (R&D). Supernatants were collected after 7 days and Ig isotype was assayed.

Cytokine detection

Bead-based sandwich immunoassay for cytokines using MILLIPLEX MAP multiplex mouse cytokine/chemokine kit (Millipore) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples were analyzed with a Luminex 100 Multi-Analyte Profiling System (Luminex Corp). Cytokine concentrations were determined by standard curve, which were generated using the mixed standard provided with the kit.

Flow cytometry

Single-cell suspensions of spleen cells, BM or PB cells were stained with fluorochrome-labeled mAb (Biolegend) against CD4 and CD8 for T cells, B220 or CD19 for B cells, Sca-1 for B cell activation, and CD69 for T cell activation. For intracellular cytokine detection, 106 splenocytes or isolated cells were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Sigma, St Louis, MO) (0.02 μg/mL) and Ionomycin (3 uM) for 4 h in the presence of Brefeldin A (10 μg/ml; Sigma). After incubation, cells were fixed using 2% PFA and then permeabilized in 0.5% saponin buffer, followed by addition of cytokine detection antibodies. Samples were acquired on a FACS Calibur and data analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR) software.

Real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR)

BM cells were collected from femurs of pristane-injected mice. Peritoneal lavage was collected from pristane-injected mice. Peritoneal cells were harvested by centrifugation and enriched for monocytes by negative selection using biotinylated mAb (Biolegend) against Ly6G+, Ter119+, CD3+, CD19+ and anti-biotin MACS MicroBeads (Miltenyi). Q-PCR was performed as previously described [14]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), cDNA was prepared using qScript cDNA supermix kit (Quanta Biosciences), and Q-PCR was performed using iTaq SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-rad). Primer sequences used were as follows: MCP1 F: 5-TTAAAAACCTGGATCGGAACCAA-3 and R: 5-GCATTAGCTTCAGATTTACGGGT-3; MX1 F: 5-GATCCGACTTCACTTCCAG ATGG-3 and R: 5-CATCTCAGTGGTAGTCAACCC-3; b-actin F: 5-ATGCTCTCCCTCACG CCATC-3 and R: 5-CACGCACGATTTCCCTCTCA-3. All reactions were performed in the 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: 1 cycle of 45°C (3 min) and 95°C (10 min), followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. The delta Ct method was used to calculate relative expression.

IFN-α reporter cell assay

A modified IFN-α assay [45] was used to measure the ability of murine lupus sera to cause IFN-induced gene expression. 1×105 reporter cells (L929, no. CCL-1; American Type Tissue Collection) were cultured with 15% wild-type or Irf5-deficient serum for 6 h and total cellular mRNA isolated. Reverse-transcription and Q-PCR were performed as described above with primers for murine IRF7 (F: 5-GACCTTGGATCTACTGTGG-3 and R: 5-TAGAAAGCAGAGGGCTTG-3) and b-actin. The delta Ct method was used to calculate relative IRF7 expression.

Statistical analysis

For normally distributed variables, differences between groups were analyzed by the Students t test. For variables not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. Normality was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data are presented as mean ± SD (normal distribution) or mean ± SEM (non-normal distribution) . p value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Legends

Acknowledgements

We thank Ian Rifkin for providing the Irf5-deficient mice by approval from Tadatsugu Tanaguchi and Tak Mak. We thank Robert Donnelly for help with the Luminex assays. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS; 5R03AR054070) and the Arthritis Foundation (to BJB).

Abbreviations

IRF

interferon regulatory factor

SLE

systemic lupus erythematosus

IC

immune complex

RNP

ribonucleoprotein

ANA

antinuclear antibodies

GWAS

genome-wide association studies

ISG

IFN-stimulated gene

PC

peritoneal cavity

CSR

class switch recombination

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest None.

References

  • 1.Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:929–939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Flesher DL, Sun X, Behrens TW, Graham RR, Criswell LA. Recent advances in the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6:461–479. doi: 10.1586/eci.10.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Morel L. Genetics of SLE: evidence from mouse models. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:348–357. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harley IT, Kaufman KM, Langefeld CD, Harley JB, Kelly JA. Genetic susceptibility to SLE: new insights from fine mapping and genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:285–290. doi: 10.1038/nrg2571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen PL, Maldonado MA. Animal models for SLE. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2003 doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1520s52. Chapter 15: Unit 15 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sigurdsson S, Nordmark G, Goring HH, Lindroos K, Wiman AC, Sturfelt G, Jonsen A, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, Moller B, Kere J, Koskenmies S, Widen E, Eloranta ML, Julkunen H, Kristjansdottir H, Steinsson K, Alm G, Ronnblom L, Syvanen AC. Polymorphisms in the tyrosine kinase 2 and interferon regulatory factor 5 genes are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:528–537. doi: 10.1086/428480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Graham RR, Kozyrev SV, Baechler EC, Reddy MV, Plenge RM, Bauer JW, Ortmann WA, Koeuth T, Gonzalez Escribano MF, Pons-Estel B, Petri M, Daly M, Gregersen PK, Martin J, Altshuler D, Behrens TW, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. A common haplotype of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) regulates splicing and expression and is associated with increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2006;38:550–555. doi: 10.1038/ng1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graham RR, Kyogoku C, Sigurdsson S, Vlasova IA, Davies LR, Baechler EC, Plenge RM, Koeuth T, Ortmann WA, Hom G, Bauer JW, Gillett C, Burtt N, Cunninghame Graham DS, Onofrio R, Petri M, Gunnarsson I, Svenungsson E, Ronnblom L, Nordmark G, Gregersen PK, Moser K, Gaffney PM, Criswell LA, Vyse TJ, Syvanen AC, Bohjanen PR, Daly MJ, Behrens TW, Altshuler D. Three functional variants of IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) define risk and protective haplotypes for human lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:6758–6763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701266104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelly JA, Kelley JM, Kaufman KM, Kilpatrick J, Bruner GR, Merrill JT, James JA, Frank SG, Reams E, Brown EE, Gibson AW, Marion MC, Langefeld CD, Li QZ, Karp DR, Wakeland EK, Petri M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Reveille JD, Vila LM, Alarcon GS, Kimberly RP, Harley JB, Edberg JC. Interferon regulatory factor-5 is genetically associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in African Americans. Genes Immun. 2008;9:187–194. doi: 10.1038/gene.2008.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Demirci FY, Manzi S, Ramsey-Goldman R, Minster RL, Kenney M, Shaw PS, Dunlop-Thomas CM, Kao AH, Rhew E, Bontempo F, Kammerer C, Kamboh MI. Association of a common interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) variant with increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Ann Hum Genet. 2007;71:308–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shin HD, Kim I, Choi CB, Lee SO, Lee HW, Bae SC. Different genetic effects of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) polymorphisms on systemic lupus erythematosus in a Korean population. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:2148–2151. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kozyrev SV, Lewen S, Reddy PM, Pons-Estel B, Witte T, Junker P, Laustrup H, Gutierrez C, Suarez A, Francisca Gonzalez-Escribano M, Martin J, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. Structural insertion/deletion variation in IRF5 is associated with a risk haplotype and defines the precise IRF5 isoforms expressed in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1234–1241. doi: 10.1002/art.22497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sigurdsson S, Goring HH, Kristjansdottir G, Milani L, Nordmark G, Sandling JK, Eloranta ML, Feng D, Sangster-Guity N, Gunnarsson I, Svenungsson E, Sturfelt G, Jonsen A, Truedsson L, Barnes BJ, Alm G, Ronnblom L, Syvanen AC. Comprehensive evaluation of the genetic variants of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) reveals a novel 5 bp length polymorphism as strong risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:872–881. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feng D, Stone RC, Eloranta ML, Sangster-Guity N, Nordmark G, Sigurdsson S, Wang C, Alm G, Syvanen AC, Ronnblom L, Barnes BJ. Genetic variants and disease-associated factors contribute to enhanced interferon regulatory factor 5 expression in blood cells of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:562–573. doi: 10.1002/art.27223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barnes BJ, Moore PA, Pitha PM. Virus-specific activation of a novel interferon regulatory factor, IRF-5, results in the induction of distinct interferon alpha genes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23382–23390. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101216200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barnes BJ, Kellum MJ, Field AE, Pitha PM. Multiple regulatory domains of IRF-5 control activation, cellular localization, and induction of chemokines that mediate recruitment of T lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5721–5740. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.16.5721-5740.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takaoka A, Yanai H, Kondo S, Duncan G, Negishi H, Mizutani T, Kano S, Honda K, Ohba Y, Mak TW, Taniguchi T. Integral role of IRF-5 in the gene induction programme activated by Toll-like receptors. Nature. 2005;434:243–249. doi: 10.1038/nature03308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schoenemeyer A, Barnes BJ, Mancl ME, Latz E, Goutagny N, Pitha PM, Fitzgerald KA, Golenbock DT. The interferon regulatory factor, IRF5, is a central mediator of toll-like receptor 7 signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17005–17012. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412584200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yasuda K, Richez C, Maciaszek JW, Agrawal N, Akira S, Marshak-Rothstein A, Rifkin IR. Murine dendritic cell type I IFN production induced by human IgG-RNA immune complexes is IFN regulatory factor (IRF)5 and IRF7 dependent and is required for IL-6 production. J Immunol. 2007;178:6876–6885. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kyogoku C, Tsuchiya N. A compass that points to lupus: genetic studies on type I interferon pathway. Genes Immun. 2007;8:445–455. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kozyrev SV, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. The genetics and biology of Irf5-mediated signaling in lupus. Autoimmunity. 2007;40:591–601. doi: 10.1080/08916930701510905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Niewold TB, Kelly JA, Flesch MH, Espinoza LR, Harley JB, Crow MK. Association of the IRF5 risk haplotype with high serum interferon-alpha activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2481–2487. doi: 10.1002/art.23613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richez C, Yasuda K, Bonegio RG, Watkins AA, Aprahamian T, Busto P, Richards RJ, Liu CL, Cheung R, Utz PJ, Marshak-Rothstein A, Rifkin IR. IFN regulatory factor 5 is required for disease development in the FcgammaRIIB−/−Yaa and FcgammaRIIB−/− mouse models of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2010;184:796–806. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Savitsky DA, Yanai H, Tamura T, Taniguchi T, Honda K. Contribution of IRF5 in B cells to the development of murine SLE-like disease through its transcriptional control of the IgG2a locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:10154–10159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005599107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reeves WH, Lee PY, Weinstein JS, Satoh M, Lu L. Induction of autoimmunity by pristane and other naturally occurring hydrocarbons. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chowdhary VR, Grande JP, Luthra HS, David CS. Characterization of haemorrhagic pulmonary capillaritis: another manifestation of Pristane-induced lupus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1405–1410. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Satoh M, Reeves WH. Induction of lupus-associated autoantibodies in BALB/c mice by intraperitoneal injection of pristane. J Exp Med. 1994;180:2341–2346. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Satoh M, Richards HB, Shaheen VM, Yoshida H, Shaw M, Naim JO, Wooley PH, Reeves WH. Widespread susceptibility among inbred mouse strains to the induction of lupus autoantibodies by pristane. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;121:399–405. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hamilton KJ, Satoh M, Swartz J, Richards HB, Reeves WH. Influence of microbial stimulation on hypergammaglobulinemia and autoantibody production in pristane-induced lupus. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;86:271–279. doi: 10.1006/clin.1997.4481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Azeredo da Silveira S, Kikuchi S, Fossati-Jimack L, Moll T, Saito T, Verbeek JS, Botto M, Walport MJ, Carroll M, Izui S. Complement activation selectively potentiates the pathogenicity of the IgG2b and IgG3 isotypes of a high affinity anti-erythrocyte autoantibody. J Exp Med. 2002;195:665–672. doi: 10.1084/jem.20012024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nacionales DC, Kelly-Scumpia KM, Lee PY, Weinstein JS, Lyons R, Sobel E, Satoh M, Reeves WH. Deficiency of the type I interferon receptor protects mice from experimental lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3770–3783. doi: 10.1002/art.23023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heer AK, Shamshiev A, Donda A, Uematsu S, Akira S, Kopf M, Marsland BJ. TLR signaling fine-tunes anti-influenza B cell responses without regulating effector T cell responses. J Immunol. 2007;178:2182–2191. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nacionales DC, Weinstein JS, Yan XJ, Albesiano E, Lee PY, Kelly-Scumpia KM, Lyons R, Satoh M, Chiorazzi N, Reeves WH. B cell proliferation, somatic hypermutation, class switch recombination, and autoantibody production in ectopic lymphoid tissue in murine lupus. J Immunol. 2009;182:4226–4236. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lien C, Fang CM, Huso D, Livak F, Lu R, Pitha PM. Critical role of IRF-5 in regulation of B-cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:4664–4668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911193107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Takahashi S, Fossati L, Iwamoto M, Merino R, Motta R, Kobayakawa T, Izui S. Imbalance towards Th1 predominance is associated with acceleration of lupus-like autoimmune syndrome in MRL mice. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1597–1604. doi: 10.1172/JCI118584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richards HB, Satoh M, Jennette JC, Croker BP, Yoshida H, Reeves WH. Interferon-gamma is required for lupus nephritis in mice treated with the hydrocarbon oil pristane. Kidney Int. 2001;60:2173–2180. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wong CK, Ho CY, Li EK, Lam CW. Elevation of proinflammatory cytokine (IL-18, IL-17, IL-12) and Th2 cytokine (IL-4) concentrations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2000;9:589–593. doi: 10.1191/096120300678828703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Haas C, Ryffel B, Le Hir M. IFN-gamma is essential for the development of autoimmune glomerulonephritis in MRL/Ipr mice. J Immunol. 1997;158:5484–5491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng SL, Moslehi J, Craft J. Roles of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 in murine lupus. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1936–1946. doi: 10.1172/JCI119361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Richards HB, Satoh M, Shaw M, Libert C, Poli V, Reeves WH. Interleukin 6 dependence of anti-DNA antibody production: evidence for two pathways of autoantibody formation in pristane-induced lupus. J Exp Med. 1998;188:985–990. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.5.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goldman M, Druet P, Gleichmann E. TH2 cells in systemic autoimmunity: insights from allogeneic diseases and chemically-induced autoimmunity. Immunol Today. 1991;12:223–227. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(91)90034-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Llorente L, Zou W, Levy Y, Richaud-Patin Y, Wijdenes J, Alcocer-Varela J, Morel-Fourrier B, Brouet JC, Alarcon-Segovia D, Galanaud P, Emilie D. Role of interleukin 10 in the B lymphocyte hyperactivity and autoantibody production of human systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med. 1995;181:839–844. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.3.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xu Q, Katakura Y, Yamashita M, Fang S, Tamura T, Matsumoto SE, Aiba Y, Teruya K, Osada K, Nishikawa R, Shirahata S. IL-10 augments antibody production in in vitro immunized lymphocytes by inducing a Th2-type response and B cell maturation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004;68:2279–2284. doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yanai H, Chen HM, Inuzuka T, Kondo S, Mak TW, Takaoka A, Honda K, Taniguchi T. Role of IFN regulatory factor 5 transcription factor in antiviral immunity and tumor suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3402–3407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611559104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hua J, Kirou K, Lee C, Crow MK. Functional assay of type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus plasma and association with anti-RNA binding protein autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1906–1916. doi: 10.1002/art.21890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee PY, Weinstein JS, Nacionales DC, Scumpia PO, Li Y, Butfiloski E, van Rooijen N, Moldawer L, Satoh M, Reeves WH. A novel type I IFN-producing cell subset in murine lupus. J Immunol. 2008;180:5101–5108. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.5101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee PY, Kumagai Y, Li Y, Takeuchi O, Yoshida H, Weinstein J, Kellner ES, Nacionales D, Barker T, Kelly-Scumpia K, van Rooijen N, Kumar H, Kawai T, Satoh M, Akira S, Reeves WH. TLR7-dependent and FcgammaR-independent production of type I interferon in experimental mouse lupus. J Exp Med. 2008;205:2995–3006. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ehlers M, Fukuyama H, McGaha TL, Aderem A, Ravetch JV. TLR9/MyD88 signaling is required for class switching to pathogenic IgG2a and 2b autoantibodies in SLE. J Exp Med. 2006;203:553–561. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Peng SL, Szabo SJ, Glimcher LH. T-bet regulates IgG class switching and pathogenic autoantibody production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:5545–5550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082114899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Semin Immunol. 2007;19:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McHeyzer-Williams LJ, McHeyzer-Williams MG. Antigen-specific memory B cell development. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:487–513. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kawabe T, Naka T, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Fujiwara H, Suematsu S, Yoshida N, Kishimoto T, Kikutani H. The immune responses in CD40-deficient mice: impaired immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. Immunity. 1994;1:167–178. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(94)90095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coffman RL, Seymour BW, Lebman DA, Hiraki DD, Christiansen JA, Shrader B, Cherwinski HM, Savelkoul HF, Finkelman FD, Bond MW, et al. The role of helper T cell products in mouse B cell differentiation and isotype regulation. Immunol Rev. 1988;102:5–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1988.tb00739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wen X, Zhang D, Kikuchi Y, Jiang Y, Nakamura K, Xiu Y, Tsurui H, Takahashi K, Abe M, Ohtsuji M, Nishimura H, Takatsu K, Shirai T, Hirose S. Transgene-mediated hyper-expression of IL-5 inhibits autoimmune disease but increases the risk of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a model of murine lupus. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:2740–2749. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Del Prete G. The concept of type-1 and type-2 helper T cells and their cytokines in humans. Int Rev Immunol. 1998;16:427–455. doi: 10.3109/08830189809043004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Akahoshi M, Nakashima H, Tanaka Y, Kohsaka T, Nagano S, Ohgami E, Arinobu Y, Yamaoka K, Niiro H, Shinozaki M, Hirakata H, Horiuchi T, Otsuka T, Niho Y. Th1/Th2 balance of peripheral T helper cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1644–1648. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1644::AID-ANR12>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wen X, Zhang D, Kikuchi Y, Jiang Y, Nakamura K, Xiu Y, Tsurui H, Takahashi K, Abe M, Ohtsuji M, Nishimura H, Takatsu K, Shirai T, Hirose S. Transgene-mediated hyper-expression of IL-5 inhibits autoimmune disease but increases the risk of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a model of murine lupus. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:2740–2749. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Le Bon A, Schiavoni G, D’Agostino G, Gresser I, Belardelli F, Tough DF. Type i interferons potently enhance humoral immunity and can promote isotype switching by stimulating dendritic cells in vivo. Immunity. 2001;14:461–470. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Boonstra A, Rajsbaum R, Holman M, Marques R, Asselin-Paturel C, Pereira JP, Bates EE, Akira S, Vieira P, Liu YJ, Trinchieri G, O’Garra A. Macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells, but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells, produce IL-10 in response to MyD88- and TRIF-dependent TLR signals, and TLR-independent signals. J Immunol. 2006;177:7551–7558. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Palucka AK, Blanck JP, Bennett L, Pascual V, Banchereau J. Cross-regulation of TNF and IFN-alpha in autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3372–3377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408506102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, Alzabin S, Lockstone H, Sahgal N, Hussell T, Feldmann M, Udalova IA. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:231–238. doi: 10.1038/ni.1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thibault DL, Chu AD, Graham KL, Balboni I, Lee LY, Kohlmoos C, Landrigan A, Higgins JP, Tibshirani R, Utz PJ. IRF9 and STAT1 are required for IgG autoantibody production and B cell expression of TLR7 in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1417–1426. doi: 10.1172/JCI30065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Legends

RESOURCES