Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2011 Nov 25;53(4):373–376. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.11.065

Synthesis of benzyl substituted naphthalenes from benzylidene tetralones

Lorraine M Deck a,*, Quintino Mgani a,, Andrea Martinez a, Alice Martinic a, Lisa J Whalen a, David L Vander Jagt b, Robert E Royer b
PMCID: PMC3686124  NIHMSID: NIHMS340702  PMID: 23794758

Abstract

A convenient and efficient synthesis of novel highly substituted dimethoxybenzylnaphthalenes, which are precursors to several dihydroxynaphthoic acids, is described. The approach involves the use of aldol chemistry to provide a number of benzylidene tetralones, which are converted to the target naphthalenes in three steps, with good to excellent yields. Grignard reaction of intermediate benzyl tetralones provided 1-substituted benzyl naphthalenes. The reported synthesis is flexible and scalable and provides access to naphthalenes having a variety of substitution patterns. These benzyl substituted naphthalenes are being converted to naphthoic acids and the bioactivities of these compounds are currently being investigated.

Keywords: Benzylidene tetralone, Benzylnaphthalene, Benzyltetralone


One area of our research focuses on the synthesis of highly substituted naphthoic acids as therapeutics for breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. 7-Benzyl-2,3-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4-propyl-1-naphthoic acid, compound1, has been shown to inhibit lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) reducing ATP levels and importantly inducing significant oxidative stress and cell death in cancer cells ( Fig. 1).1 Compound 1 also inhibits tumorigenesis in human lymphoma and pancreatic cancer xenograft models and along with another inhibitor induces lymphoma regression. The structure of compound 1 is modeled on the structure of the natural product gossypol, compound 2, which occurs in cottonseed (Fig. 1). Gossypol itself exhibits multiple biological properties including spermicidal,2 antiparasitic,36 anticancer710 and antiviral.1114 Multiple bioactivities of gossypol have stimulated wide interest in the development of gossypol derivatives to explore structure–activity relationships (SARs).1520 Unfortunately gossypol is toxic, due to the aldehyde groups, and derivatives which do not have an aldehyde functional group retain or show enhanced biological activity. However, these derivatives are not selective inhibitors.14 Dihydroxynaphthoic acids, which can be viewed as analogs of gossypol, are selective non-toxic inhibitors of LDHA. Our interest lies in synthesizing several analogs of compound 1 that could be tested for the inhibition of LDHA with the hope of developing more potent inhibitors.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The precursors needed for the synthesis of various analogs of compound 1 are benzyl substituted dimethoxynaphthalenes, similar structurally to compound 3 (Fig. 1). In order to explore SARs of various benzyl substituted naphthoic acids we developed a short, efficient, and convenient synthetic scheme to synthesize benzyl substituted dimethoxynaphthalenes from benzylidene tetralones. The synthetic schemes were designed to provide a number of 7-benzyl substituted dihydroxynaphthoic acids that could be synthesized from the benzylnaphthalenes. The benzylidene tetralones were synthesized from the known tetralones compounds 10a21 and 10o18 and the new tetralone, compound 10m. Tetralones 10a and 10o were synthesized using procedures described in the literature18,21 except cyclization of known 4-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)butanoic acid to form 10a was performed using polyphosphoric ester rather than polyphosphoric acid. Polyphosphoric ester produced better yields and purer product.

Compound 10m was synthesized using a procedure previously described by our group18 as shown in Scheme 1. Bromination of 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethoxybenzene (4) at 0 °C using bromine, via an electrophilic aromatic substitution mechanism, afforded compound 5 in a 90% yield.22,23 In some preparations small amounts of another regioisomer 1-bromo-4-ethyl-2,3-dimethoxybenzene were formed. To avoid the formation of both isomers an alternate efficient and highly regioselective silica gel catalyzed synthesis using N-bromosuccinimide produced the desired regioisomer in a 97% yield24 and avoided the use of corrosive bromine. Since both isomers display a pair of doublets in the aromatic area of the proton NMR spectra, HMQC and HMBC experiments confirmed that the bromine was ortho to the ethyl group in compound 5. Additionally, confirmation of formation of the correct regioisomer came from comparison with data from the literature.17,18

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of tetralone: Reagents and conditions: (a) Br2 (1 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 2 h or NBS (1.1 equiv), silica gel, CCl4, rt, 12 h, 90%; (b) Mg (1.5 equiv), CH3CH2Br (0.1 equiv), I2, THF, reflux, 1.0 h then 6 (1.2 equiv), 0 °C to rt, 12 h, then H2O/HCl, 89%; (c) KOH (4 equiv), EtOH, H2O, reflux, 8.0 h, then HCl/ice, 90%; (d) H2, 10% Pd/C, HOAc, 60 psi, 60 °C, 8h, 75%; (e) PPE, CH2Cl2, reflux, 5 h, then H2O, 88%.

The synthesis of compound 7 features the incorporation of the carbon atoms for the second ring of the naphthalene system in one step by the reaction of the Grignard reagent formed from compound 5 with ethyl 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-butenoate (6) in an 89% yield.17,18 Since the precursor, compound 6, is not readily available, it was prepared by Wadsworth–Emmons reaction of pyruvic aldehyde dimethyl acetal with triethylphosphonoacetate in tetrahydrofuran or dimethylformamide followed by hydrolysis.2527 The E/Z ratio of the product is different for the Wadsworth–Emmons reaction in the two solvents but hydrolysis in acid affords 96% of trans (E) stereospecifically. The E/Z ratio of compound 6 did not affect the progress of the subsequent reactions in the synthesis. The stereochemical assignment of the aldehyde, compound 6, is based upon proton NMR analysis.25,26 The Grignard reagent is added slowly to a cold solution of ethyl 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-butenoate (6) to ensure attack at the more reactive aldehyde carbonyl carbon to give an 89% yield of predominately the E ester. To confirm the diastereoselectivity of the reaction and the structure of the product a NOE spectrum (300 MHz) was taken. Irradiation of the methyl group in compound 7 resulted in no enhancement of the resonance of the alkene hydrogen and enhancement of the hydrogen on the alcohol carbon, which verifies that the ester has E stereochemistry. Pure ester was isolated by chromatography but reduction of the crude mixture or the pure compound using hydrogen in acetic acid was unsuccessful and afforded a complex mixture. Therefore the crude ester, compound 7, was saponified using potassium hydroxide in ethanol/water and acidified to give a 90% yield of carboxylic acid, 8, as an oil that solidified. Trituration and recrystallization from ethyl acetate/hexane afforded compound 8 as a white crystalline solid and was determined to be the E isomer by a NOE experiment. The infrared spectrum confirmed the presence of the allylic alcohol group, the carboxyl group and the alkene.

Hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis of the crude or pure acid, 8, was accomplished using hydrogen in concentrated acetic acid at 60 psi (Parr hydrogenator) and 60 °C in the presence of 10% palladium on charcoal to afford the saturated acid, compound 9, in a 75% yield. Cyclization with polyphosphoric ester in a Friedel–Crafts type of reaction gave an 88% yield of tetralone 10. The cyclization reaction gives higher yields and purer product with polyphosphoric ester than with other reagents such as polyphosphoric acid, sulfuric acid or methanesulfonic acid.

Conversion of tetralones 10a, 10m and 10o to benzylnaphthalenes, compounds 14a–14f, 14h and 14j–14u is shown in Scheme 2. Benzylidene tetralones, compounds 11a–11u, were readily formed from tetralones 10a, 10m and 10o by aldol condensation of the appropriate aldehyde in ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution in 80–95% yields.2836 The proton NMR spectra of compounds 11a–11u display a downfield shift of the vinyl proton due to the diamagnetic anisotropy effect of the carbonyl group, which indicates that the benzylidene compounds are the E isomers. 37 The 2-bromo compound, 11i, and the 2-trifluoromethyl compound, 11e, gave the same type of unexpected result as observed by Yee et al. for the monomethoxy compound (2-(2-bromobenzylidene)-6-methoxy-1-tetralone) in the proton NMR (300 MHz) spectrum.38 They observed a singlet at 2.9 ppm corresponding to the four CH2 protons of 3,4-dihydronaphthalene instead of two distinct multiplets at 2.5 and 3.0 ppm. Compound 11i has one multiplet at 2.9 ppm and compound 11e has a singlet at 2.9 ppm for the four CH2 protons of the 3,4-dihydronaphthalene ring system. In all other compounds except for compound 11c, the four CH2 protons of the 3,4-dihydronaphthalene are two distinct multiplets at 2.5 and 3.0 ppm. Compound 11c has two distinct multiplets but at 2.96 and 2.87 ppm. This unexpected degeneracy occurred with ortho substituted compounds and did not occur with meta or para substituted benzyl compounds.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of benzyl naphthalenes: Reagents and conditions: (a) R3CHO (1.1 equiv), 5% KOH/EtOH, rt, 24–36 h, then H2O, 80–95%; (b) H2, 10% Pd/C, EtOAc, 30 psi, rt, 1 h, 83–100%; (c) NaBH4 (2 equiv), EtOH, reflux, 2 h then; (d) 6 M HCl, reflux, 2 h, 85–95%; (e) 10% Pd/C, triglyme, reflux, 5 h, filter then H2O, 90–95%; (f) 11g, H2, 10% Pd/C, CH3OH, 30 psi, rt, 2 h, 60%.

Compounds 11a–11u were hydrogenated using 10% palladium on charcoal in ethyl acetate for 1 h at 30 psi (Parr hydrogenator) to afford benzyl substituted tetralones, compounds 12a–12u, in 80– 95% yield.3941 Hydrogenation in ethyl acetate using palladium on charcoal for 2 h and/or hydrogenation for 1 h using palladium on calcium carbonate resulted in loss of the double bond and bromine in compounds 11g and 11i to give compound 12a. When compound 11g was hydrogenated for 2 h in methanol using palladium on charcoal loss of the double bond, bromine, and the carbonyl oxygen resulted, affording compound 15 in a 60% yield.38,39 The proton NMR exhibited an upfield shift of the aromatic hydrogen due to the loss of the carbonyl group. The loss of the carbonyl group was also verified by 13C NMR and infrared spectroscopy.

Compounds 12a–12u were reduced to alcohols using sodium borohydride in refluxing ethanol and then dehydrated by refluxing with aqueous hydrochloric acid to form alkenes 13a–13u in 85– 95% yield.18 The structures were verified by the loss of the carbonyl in the infrared and 13C NMR spectra. Furthermore the loss of a chiral center in compounds 12a–12u by the formation of a double bond in compounds 13a–13u resulted in well-resolved peaks in the alkyl proton area of the NMR spectrum.

Aromatization of alkenes, 13a–13u, to compounds 14a–14u using dichlorodicyano-benzoquinone (DDQ) in refluxing benzene did not give the desired results possibly due to the oxidation of the benzylic methylene carbon. To circumvent this difficulty an alternate aromatization using palladium on carbon in triglyme proved successful and the naphthalene compounds, 14a–14f, 14h, and 14j–14u were obtained in 90–95% yields. It was observed that under these conditions compounds 13g and 13i, which have a bromobenzyl substituent, underwent dehalogenation, which was facilitated by the high reflux temperature and the palladium catalyst. As expected, compound 13l did not undergo dehalogenation.

An attractive route to the formation of 1-substituted benzyl-naphthalenes is reaction of compounds 12a and 12f with a Grignard reagent followed by dehydration and oxidation as shown in Scheme 3. Introduction of a group ortho to the benzyl group was easily accomplished by reaction of compounds 12a and 12f with methylmagnesium bromide and ethylmagnesium bromide. The resulting tertiary alcohols were readily dehydrated using dilute hydrochloric acid or refluxing with magnesium sulfate in toluene to form alkenes 16a–16c in an 80% yield.21 Aromatization occurred upon refluxing 16a–16c in triglyme containing 10% palladium on charcoal to afford compounds 17a–17c in an 80% yield.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of 1-substituted benzylnaphthalenes: Reagents and conditions: (a) R2MgBr (1.5 equiv), THF, reflux, 2.0 h, then HCl/H2O, 75% then; (b) 6 M HCl reflux 2 h or MgSO4, toluene, reflux, 2 h, 80%; (c) 10% Pd/C, triglyme, reflux, 4 h, filter then H2O, 80%.

In conclusion, a short and convenient synthetic scheme was developed to afford several benzyl substituted naphthalenes that are being converted to naphthoic acids. Bioactivities of these compounds are currently being investigated

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grants HL68598 and GM060201 from the National Institutes of Health. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained at the UNM Mass Spectrometry Facility, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Footnotes

Supplementary data

Supplementary data (1H, 13C NMR spectroscopic and HRMS data) associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.11.065.

References and notes

  • 1.Le A, Cooper CR, Gouw AM, Dinavahi R, Maitra A, Deck LM, Royer RE, Vander Jagt DL, Dang CV. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2037–2042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914433107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu D. Drugs. 1989;38:333–341. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938030-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heidrich JE, Hunsaker LA, Vander Jagt DL. IRCS Med Sci. 1983;11:304. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzales-Garz MT, Said-Fernandez S. Exp Parasitol. 1988;66:253–255. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(88)90097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Montamat EE, Burgos C, Gerez de Burgos NM, Rovai LE, Blanco A, Segura EL. Science. 1982;28:288–289. doi: 10.1126/science.6750791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eid JE, Veno H, Wang CC, Donelson JE. Exp Parasitol. 1988;66:140–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(88)90059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jaroszewski JW, Kaplan NO, Cohen JS. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6936–6943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Keniry MA, Hollander C, Benz CC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;164:947–953. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)91550-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tuszynski GP, Cossu G. Cancer Res. 1984;44:768–771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Benz CC, Keniry MA, Frd JM, Townsend AJ, Cox FW, Palayoor KH. Mol Pharmacol. 1990;37:840–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dorsett PH, Kerstine EE, Powers LJ. J Pharmacol. 1975;64:1073–1075. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600640654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Radloff RJ, Deck LM, Royer RE, Vander Jagt DL. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1986;18:1063–1073. doi: 10.1016/0031-6989(86)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lin TS, Schinaz R, Griffith BP, August EM, Eriksson BFH, Zheng DK, Huang L, Prusoff WH. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:2149–2151. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.12.2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Royer RE, Deck LM, Mertz GJ, Vander Jagt DL. Pharmacol Res. 1991;24:407–412. doi: 10.1016/1043-6618(91)90045-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Royer RE, Deck LM, Campos NM, Hunsaker LA, Vander Jagt DL. J Med Chem. 1986;29:1799–1801. doi: 10.1021/jm00159a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deck LM, Vander Jagt DL, Royer RE. J Med Chem. 1991;34:3301–3305. doi: 10.1021/jm00115a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Royer RE, Deck LM, Vander Jagt TJ, Martinez FJ, Mills RG, Young SA, Vander Jagt DL. J Med Chem. 1995;38:2427–2432. doi: 10.1021/jm00013a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Deck LM, Royer RE, Chamblee BB, Hernandez VM, Malone RR, Torres JE, Hunsaker LA, Piper RC, Makler MT, Vander Jagt DL. J Med Chem. 1998;41:3879–3887. doi: 10.1021/jm980334n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei J, Kitada S, Rega MF, Emdadi A, Yuan H, Cellitti J, Slebbins JL, Zhai D, Sun J, Yang L, Dahl R, Zhang Z, Wu B, Wang S, Reed TA, Lawrence N, Sebti S, Reed JC, Pellecchia M. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:904–913. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wei J, Rega MF, Kitada S, Yuan H, Zhai D, Resbood P, Seltzman HH, Twine CE, Reed JC, Pellecchia M. Cancer Lett. 2009;273:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hamada A, Chang YA, Uretsky N, Miller DD. J Med Chem. 1984;27:675–680. doi: 10.1021/jm00371a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edwards JD, Jr, Cashaw JL. J Am Chem Soc. 1956;78:3821–3824. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ognyanov V, Petrov O, Tikholov E, Mollov N. Helv Chim Acta. 1989;72:353–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Konishi H, Aritomi K, Okano T, Kiji J. Bull Chem Soc Japan. 1989;62:591– 593. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Curley RW, Jr, Ticoras CJ. Synth Commun. 1986;16:627–631. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Curley RW, Jr, Ticoras CJ. J Org Chem. 1986;51:256–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leuenberger HGW, Boguth W, Barner R, Schmid M, Zell R. Helv Chim Acta. 1979;62:455–462. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tewari SC, Rastogi SN. Indian J Chem. 1979;17B:281–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shih H, Carrera C, Cottam HB, Carson DA, Deng L, Adachi SJ. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2000;10:487–490. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ananthanarayanan CV, Anand N, Bindra JS, Neyyarapally AT, Rastogi SN. Indian J Chem. 1977;15B:154–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rao CJ, Reddy KM, Murthy AK. Indian J Chem. 1981;20B:282–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bayer H, Batzl C, Hartmann RW, Mannschreck A. J Med Chem. 1991;34:2685–2691. doi: 10.1021/jm00113a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chu GH, Li PK. Syn Commun. 2001;31:621–629. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kevill DN, Weiler ED, Cromwell NH. J Org Chem. 1963;29:1276–1278. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El-Rayyes NR, Al-Jawhary AJ. J Heterocycl Chem. 1986;23:135–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jagtap PG, Degterev A, Choi S, Keys H, Yuan J, Cuny GD. J Med Chem. 2007;50:1886–1895. doi: 10.1021/jm061016o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pouget C, Fagnere C, Basly JP, Habrioux G, Chulia AJ. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12:1059–1061. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00072-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yee SW, Jarno L, Gomaa MS, Elford C, Ooi LL, Coogan MP, McClelland R, Nicholson RI, Evans BAJ, Brancale A, Simons C. J Med Chem. 2005;48:6123–7131. doi: 10.1021/jm0501681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yee SW, Simons C. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;14:5651–5654. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Borsche W, Hofmann P, Kuhn H. Justus Leibigs Annalen der Chemie. 1943;554:23–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aboraia AS, Makowski B, Bahja A, Prosser D, Brancale A, Jones G, Simons C. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45:4427–4434. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES