Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1984 Feb;4(2):254–259. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.2.254

Isolated clusters of paired tandemly repeated sequences in the Xenopus laevis genome.

D Carroll, J E Garrett, B S Lam
PMCID: PMC368689  PMID: 6700590

Abstract

There exist in the Xenopus laevis genome clusters of tandemly repeated DNA sequences, consisting of two types of 393-base-pair repeating unit. Each such cluster contains several units of one of these paired tandem repeats (PTR-1), followed by several units of the other repeat (PTR-2). The number of repeats of each type is variable from cluster to cluster and averages about seven of each type per cluster. Every cluster has ca. 1,000 base pairs of common left flanking sequence (adjacent to the PTR-1 repeats) and 1,000 base pairs of common right flanking sequence (adjacent to the PTR-2 repeats). Beyond these common flanks, the DNA sequences are different in the eight cloned genomic fragments we have studied. Thus, the hundreds of PTR clusters in the genome are dispersed at apparently unrelated sites. Nucleotide sequences of representative PTR-1 and PTR-2 repeats are 64% homologous. These sequences do not reveal an obvious function. However, the related species X. mulleri and X. borealis have sequences homologous to PTR-1 and PTR-2, which show the same repeat lengths and genomic organization. This evolutionary conservation suggests positive selection for the clusters. Maintenance of these sequences at dispersed sites imposes constraints on possible mechanisms of concerted evolution.

Full text

PDF
254

Images in this article

255Image
on p.255
257Image
on p.257

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baltimore D. Gene conversion: some implications for immunoglobulin genes. Cell. 1981 Jun;24(3):592–594. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisbee C. A., Baker M. A., Wilson A. C., Haji-Azimi I., Fischberg M. Albumin phylogeny for clawed frogs (Xenopus). Science. 1977 Feb 25;195(4280):785–787. doi: 10.1126/science.65013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botchan P., Reeder R. H., Dawid I. B. Restriction analysis of the nontranscribed spacers of Xenopus laevis ribosomal DNA. Cell. 1977 Jul;11(3):599–607. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90077-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown D. D., Wensink P. C., Jordan E. A comparison of the ribosomal DNA's of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri: the evolution of tandem genes. J Mol Biol. 1972 Jan 14;63(1):57–73. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90521-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown D. D., Wensink P. C., Jordan E. Purification and some characteristics of 5S DNA from Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Dec;68(12):3175–3179. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.3175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson E. H., Hough B. R., Amenson C. S., Britten R. J. General interspersion of repetitive with non-repetitive sequence elements in the DNA of Xenopus. J Mol Biol. 1973 Jun 15;77(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doolittle W. F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):601–603. doi: 10.1038/284601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dover G. Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature. 1982 Sep 9;299(5879):111–117. doi: 10.1038/299111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fedoroff N. V., Brown D. D. The nucleotide sequence of oocyte 5S DNA in Xenopus laevis. I. The AT-rich spacer. Cell. 1978 Apr;13(4):701–716. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90220-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fedoroff N. V. On spacers. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):697–710. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90086-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jagadeeswaran P., Forget B. G., Weissman S. M. Short interspersed repetitive DNA elements in eucaryotes: transposable DNA elements generated by reverse transcription of RNA pol III transcripts? Cell. 1981 Oct;26(2 Pt 2):141–142. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klein H. L., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jan 15;289(5794):144–148. doi: 10.1038/289144a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lam B. S., Carroll D. Tandemly repeated DNA sequences from Xenopus laevis. I. Studies on sequence organization and variation in satellite 1 DNA (741 base-pair repeat). J Mol Biol. 1983 Apr 25;165(4):567–585. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80267-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lam B. S., Carroll D. Tandemly repeated DNA sequences from Xenopus laevis. II. Dispersed clusters of a 388 base-pair repeating unit. J Mol Biol. 1983 Apr 25;165(4):587–597. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80268-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nagylaki T., Petes T. D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):315–337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Orgel L. E., Crick F. H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pardue M. L. Localization of repeated DNA sequences in Xenopus chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:475–482. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Petes T. D. Unequal meiotic recombination within tandem arrays of yeast ribosomal DNA genes. Cell. 1980 Mar;19(3):765–774. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(80)80052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Potter S., Truett M., Phillips M., Maher A. Eucaryotic transposable genetic elements with inverted terminal repeats. Cell. 1980 Jul;20(3):639–647. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90310-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Roeder G. S., Fink G. R. Movement of yeast transposable elements by gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(18):5621–5625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Scherer S., Davis R. W. Recombination of dispersed repeated DNA sequences in yeast. Science. 1980 Sep 19;209(4463):1380–1384. doi: 10.1126/science.6251545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Slightom J. L., Blechl A. E., Smithies O. Human fetal G gamma- and A gamma-globin genes: complete nucleotide sequences suggest that DNA can be exchanged between these duplicated genes. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):627–638. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90426-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith G. P. Unequal crossover and the evolution of multigene families. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:507–513. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith H. O., Birnstiel M. L. A simple method for DNA restriction site mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Sep;3(9):2387–2398. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.9.2387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Southern E. M. Measurement of DNA length by gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1979 Dec;100(2):319–323. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90235-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spohr G., Reith W., Sures I. Organization and sequence analysis of a cluster of repetitive DNA elements from Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1981 Oct 5;151(4):573–592. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90424-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spradling A. C., Rubin G. M. Drosophila genome organization: conserved and dynamic aspects. Annu Rev Genet. 1981;15:219–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.001251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Szostak J. W., Wu R. Unequal crossing over in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1980 Apr 3;284(5755):426–430. doi: 10.1038/284426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Truett M. A., Jones R. S., Potter S. S. Unusual structure of the FB family of transposable elements in Drosophila. Cell. 1981 Jun;24(3):753–763. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Arsdell S. W., Denison R. A., Bernstein L. B., Weiner A. M., Manser T., Gesteland R. F. Direct repeats flank three small nuclear RNA pseudogenes in the human genome. Cell. 1981 Oct;26(1 Pt 1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wahl G. M., Stern M., Stark G. R. Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and rapid hybridization by using dextran sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3683–3687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wahli W., Dawid I. B. Isolation of two closely related vitellogenin genes, including their flanking regions, from a Xenopus laevis gene library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1437–1441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Woo S. L. A sensitive and rapid method for recombinant phage screening. Methods Enzymol. 1979;68:389–395. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)68028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES