Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum Pfs25 antigen, expressed on the surface of zygotes and ookinetes, is one of the leading targets for the development of a malaria transmission-blocking vaccine (TBV). Our laboratory has been evaluating DNA plasmid based Pfs25 vaccine in mice and non-human primates. Previously, we established that in vivo electroporation (EP) delivery is an effective method to improve the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine encoding Pfs25 in mice. In order to optimize the in vivo EP procedure and test for its efficacy in more clinically relevant larger animal models, we employed in vivo EP to evaluate the immune response and protective efficacy of Pfs25 encoding DNA vaccine in nonhuman primates (Olive baboons, Papio anubis). The results showed that at a dose of 2.5 mg DNA vaccine, antibody responses were significantly enhanced with EP as compared to without EP resulting in effective transmission blocking efficiency. Similar immunogenicity enhancing effect of EP was also observed with lower doses (0.5 mg and 1 mg) of DNA plasmids. Further, final boosting with a single dose of recombinant Pfs25 protein resulted in dramatically enhanced antibody titers and significantly increased functional transmission blocking efficiency. Our study suggests priming with DNA vaccine via EP along with protein boost regimen as an effective method to elicit potent immunogenicity of malaria DNA vaccines in nonhuman primates and provides the basis for further evaluation in human volunteers.
Keywords: Pfs25, Malaria, Transmission blocking vaccine, DNA vaccine, Electroporation, Prime boost
1. Introduction
Malaria remains one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity, with 3.2 billion people at risk, 300–500 million clinical cases and more than 1 million deaths annually [1]. The malaria parasite has a complex life cycle and various stages provide potential targets for the development of vaccines. In particular, vaccines that target antigens found on sexual and mosquito midgut stages of the parasite are uniquely capable of interrupting malaria transmission [2–4]. Transmission blocking vaccines (TBV) elicit antibodies which, upon ingestion, block parasite development in the mosquito midgut thus rendering them transmission incompetent. TBV candidates in various stages of development for P. falciparum include proteins Pfs48/45, Pfs230 and Pfs25 [5–8]. Among them, Pfs25 expressed on the surface of gametes, zygotes and ookinetes, is one of the most investigated targets for TBV development. Pfs25 has been difficult to produce in reproducibly functional conformation in recombinant expression systems [10, 11]. Despite these challenges, considerable progress has been made in the expression and enhancement of immunogenicity along with formulation in various adjuvants [12–14]. A phase I clinical trial of Pfs25 expressed in Pichia pastoris formulated with Montanide ISA 51 revealed moderate immunogenicity [15] emphasizing the need for improved vaccine design and alternate approaches.
We have been investigating Pfs25 in the form of DNA vaccine plasmids [16–19] as an alternate approach. The rationale for DNA based vaccine development has been to exploit the mammalian host’s cellular machinery to produce the protein antigen for presentation to the host immune system [20]. In previous studies in mice, a DNA vaccine expressing Pfs25 elicited strong antibody responses [16], while delivery by in vivo electroporation (EP) significantly enhanced immunogenicity [19]. The EP has been used for over 20 years as a means of introducing macromolecules, including DNA into cells in vitro [21] and for transfection of plasmids into different tissues in vivo [22]. In vivo EP is believed to increases the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines via recruitment of immune cells such as dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes to the site of immunization [25, 26]. Encouraged by enhanced immunogenicity of Pfs25 DNA vaccine by EP in mice, we evaluated EP delivery of Pfs25 DNA vaccine in nonhuman primates (Olive baboons) for the development of a potential transmission blocking vaccine against P. falciparum.
2. Materials & Methods
2.1. DNA vaccine plasmids
Pfs25 sequence optimized for expression in mammalian cells [18], lacking signal and anchor sequences was cloned in VR1020 (Vical, Inc., San Diego, CA). Additionally, all the three putative N-glycosylation sites were mutated to replace N residues with Q. Plasmid DNA (<30 EU per mg endotoxin) was purified by Aldevron (ND, USA) and supplied at a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml.
2.2. Immunizations of Olive baboons (Papio anubis)
The immunization studies were approved by the scientific and ethics review committee of the Institute of Primate Research, (Karen) Kenya (#10-10-2007). The baboons were trapped from their wild habitats, maintained in quarantine for 3 months, screened for the presence of infection with worms and protozoan parasites and successfully treated using ivermectin and/or metronidazole as appropriate months before the start of immunization. All the animals (7.0 to 12.4 kg) were free of mycobacterial infection. Detailed hematological tests certified all 20 animals during their quarantine period, just prior to and at the termination of the vaccine trial in excellent health with no discernible side effects.
The animals (N=4) assigned randomly to five groups were sedated with ketamine (10 mg/kg) for immunization with DNA vaccines in endotoxin-free PBS (0.5 ml each site by IM route, quadriceps (Fig. 1). In groups 1, 3, 4 and 5, DNA was administered with in vivo electroporation (EP) using an ICHOR pulse generator and TriGrid Electrode arrays (8mm/15.5mm/7.5mm), Ichor Medical Systems Inc. (San Diego, CA). Animals in groups 1, 2 and 5 received a final boost of recombinant Pfs25 protein (17 ug) emulsified with Montanide ISA51 (total volume 0.5 ml, IM, quadriceps, 2 sites) at 20 week time point (8 weeks after last DNA vaccine immunization).
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of immunization and sera collection schedule. Animals (4 per group) were immunized at indicated time points. Only animals in groups 1, 2 and 5 received a final heterologous boost with recombinant Pfs25 formulated in Montanide ISA-51. Various bleeds identified as B1 to B6 in the study.
2.3 Assessment of immunogenicity by ELISA
Baboon sera were analyzed for antibody titers by ELISA using 96-well Immunolon-2 plates coated with 1.5 μg/ml rPfs25 (codon harmonized sequence expressed as His-tagged protein using pET (K-) expression vector in E. coli, Kumar et al., in preparation) [19]. HRP-conjugated anti- human IgG (KPL Inc., MD) was used at 1:10,000 dilution and the plates were developed with ABTS substrate at 25°C and read at 405 nm using an ELISA reader (VersaMax, Molecular devices, CA). To determine avidity of antibodies, plates were incubated for 15 min with NaSCN (1, 2, 4, 8M) after primary antibody incubation followed by all the other ELISA steps. The binding of antibody to antigen in the absence of NaSCN was considered as 100% (total binding) and residual binding after NaSCN step was expressed as percent of total binding.
2.4 Western blot analysis
Lysate of gametes purified from P. falciparum gametocytes (NF54) was fractioned by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and analyzed using pooled baboon sera (1:5,000). Peroxidase conjugated anti-human IgG (1:10,000) was used as a secondary antibody and the membranes were developed using ECL western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare Ltd, UK).
2.5. Membrane feeding assay (MFA)
For MFA, baboon sera were mixed with normal human serum, P. falciparum (NF54) gametocytes (0.3% final) and human erythrocytes (50% heamatocrit). MFA with baboon sera were performed as described [19]. Adult (4–5 days old) Anopheles gambiae (Keele strain developed by Hillary Hurd and Paul Taylor) mosquitoes starved for 5 hours were allowed to feed through a parafilm using water jacketed glass feeders warmed to 37°C. After 15 minutes, blood fed mosquitoes were maintained for 8–10 days in the insectary (26°C, 70–80% RH). Midgut oocysts were enumerated and mosquito infectivity was measured by comparing oocyst burden as well as prevalence of infected mosquitoes.
2.6. Assessment of transmission blocking activity using mice infected with Pfs25TrPb parasites
The transmission blocking activity of baboon sera was also assessed using in vivo transmission of malaria parasites from mice infected with a transgenic P. berghei parasite that expresses Pfs25 (Pfs25TrPb) [29] after passive immunization. Briefly, Swiss Webster female mice (5–8 weeks old) were infected with 106 Pfs25TrPb parasites. Four days post-infection, starved Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were allowed to take a blood meal on the mice. Mice were then given either 200 μl pre-immune (n=2) or immune sera (n=4, groups 2 and 5) via I.V. injection, rested for 15 min to allow equilibration of the serum. Starved mosquitoes from the same batch were allowed to feed on these mice. Unfed mosquitoes were removed and blood-fed mosquitoes were maintained in the insectary (20°C, 70–80% RH). Ten days post blood feeding mosquito midguts were dissected and oocysts were enumerated. Oocyst counts in the mosquitoes fed on a given mouse before and after administration of sera were used to calculate percent transmission reduction.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Antibody endpoint titers were defined as serum dilutions giving an absorbance higher than the average absorbance at 405 nm of pre-immune serum + 2SD. The differences in antibody response were analyzed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Percent transmission blocking activity was determined by the formula 100 x (oocyst number in pre-immune sera - oocyst number in immune sera)/oocyst number in pre-immune sera. To account for animal to animal variation, pre-immune sera used were from corresponding immunized animals. The prevalence of mosquito infectivity was analyzed by 100 x (number of mosquito infected/total number of mosquito dissected). Statistical significance of oocyst counts between pre-immune and immune groups was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann–Whitney U test was used to examine the difference in oocyst counts per mosquito before and after administration of sera in in vivo blocking assay. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Instat3 software package and p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
3. Results
3.1 Evaluation of DNA vaccine dose-dependent antibody response with or without in vivo EP
The studies reported here were aimed at evaluation of efficacy of DNA vaccine along with in vivo EP in non-human primates (Olive baboons). After a single dose immunization, only one out of four animals in group 2 (2.5 mg without EP) exhibited detectable anti-Pfs25 response, while all the animals in group 3, 4 and 5 immunized with varying doses of DNA vaccines (0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 mg, respectively) with EP were positive for anti-Pfs25 antibodies (Fig. 2A, 2B). In comparison to group 2, animals in group 5 given the same dose 2.5 mg, but with EP, elicited much higher antibody response. After administration of an additional 2 doses of the DNA vaccines, anti-Pfs25 antibody titers were 4-fold higher (titer 1:80,000) in group 5 (2.5 mg with EP, Fig. 2D) than in group 2 (2.5 mg without EP, titer 1:20,000, Fig. 2C). These results also revealed comparable anti-Pfs25 ELISA titers after 3 dose immunization between group 2 (2.5 mg without EP) and group 3 (0.5 mg with EP) indicating a minimum of 5-fold dose sparing effect of the EP method (Fig. 2B). No anti-Pfs25 antibodies were detected in the control groups (Group 1). These results clearly demonstrate that EP enhanced the immunogenicity of the Pfs25 DNA vaccine, while immune response without EP at relatively high antigen dose were lower and variable from animal to animal.
Fig. 2.
Evaluation of antibody titers by ELISA in the sera of baboons (n=4 per group). (A) Comparative antibody reactivity in groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 at dilution 1:3200 in the sera 4 weeks after 1st DNA vaccine immunization (p<0.0058) (B1 bleeds) and (B) sera (bleeds B4) obtained 4 weeks after 3rd DNA vaccine immunization (p<0.037) (C) Various bleeds (B1, B2 and B4) of group 2 animals immunized with 2.5 mg VR1020/25 DNA vaccine without EP (D) Various bleeds (B1, B2 and B4) of group 5 animals immunized with 2.5 mg VR1020/25 DNA vaccine with EP (E) Antibody titers after final recombinant Pfs25 protein boost (bleeds B6 of groups 2 and 5). Results shown are the mean absorbance at each serum dilution. The endpoint titers were defined as serum dilutions giving an absorbance values higher than the average absorbance at 405 nm of pre-immune serum + 2SD. Statistically significant differences in immune response between groups were analyzed with one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The error bars indicate SD.
3.2. Recombinant protein boost enhances the potency of DNA vaccines
Animals in group 1 (vector alone), group 2 (2.5mg without EP) and group 5 (2.5 mg with EP) were given a final boost with Pfs25 emulsified in Montanide ISA51. After protein boost, animals in both the groups (2 and 5) showed much higher anti-Pfs25 antibody titers (mean reciprocal titers exceeding 1:640,000) as compared to vector alone group 1 (1:1600) (Fig. 2E). These results suggest that immunization with DNA alone, with or without EP, was effective in priming antigen-specific immune response, and a single dose of heterologous protein antigen delivery resulted in robust boosting of antibody responses in both the groups.
3.3. Avidity of antibodies and recognition of native protein
A method based on dissociation of antibody and antigen by NaSCN was employed to measure avidity/strength of binding. The concentration of NaSCN to effect 50% dissociation of bound antibody was approximately 4M with sera after the protein boost (Fig. 3C, D) as compared to less than 2.3M for sera after 3 DNA immunizations regardless of EP and prior to protein boost (Fig 3A, B). These differences suggest that EP did not affect avidity of antibodies, however, protein boost resulted in antibodies of higher avidity. Western blotting results revealed strong recognition of Pfs25 in the parasite lysates by antibodies in the sera from groups 2, 3, 4 and 5, while sera from group 1 and pre-immune sera from all the groups did not show any reactivity (Fig. 4)
Fig. 3.
Comparative avidity of antibodies in the presence of various concentrations (M) of NaSCN. Results shown are for individual animals immunized with 2.5 mg DNA dose without EP (panels A and C; before and after protein boost, respectively) and with EP (panels B and D; before and after protein boost, respectively).
Fig. 4.

Recognition of native Pfs25 protein in P. falciparum gametes by Western blot analysis. Reactivity of sera from pooled sera (4 animals in each group) are shown, Lanes 1; preimmune sera obtained prior to immunization, Lanes 2; sera after 3rd DNA immunization (B4), Lanes 3: sera corresponding to B6 bleeds.
3.4. Determination of transmission blocking activity by MFA
Transmission blocking assays performed with individual baboon sera at 1:2 dilutions (Table 1) revealed 91% inhibition of oocyst development with sera from baboons immunized with 2.5 mg Pfs25 DNA vaccine with EP. In contrast, sera from baboons immunized with the same dose of Pfs25 DNA without EP showed only 50% reduction in oocyst number. Sera from vector alone group also demonstrated non-specific inhibition (23%) in the number of oocyst (likely due to non-specific baboon serum factors affecting P. falciparum gametocytes in the vectors). Oocyst numbers in the midgut in group 1 and group 2 were not different statistically. Sera from groups 3 (0.5 mg with EP) and 4 (1.0 mg with EP) did reveal reduction in the oocyst number (50% and 86%, respectively). An important observation made from these functional assays was that DNA vaccine dose of 0.5 mg given by EP was as effective as a five-fold higher DNA dose administered without EP. These results not only confirm immune enhancement effect of EP but also provide evidence of a dose-sparing effect with low doses of DNA with EP displaying transmission blocking comparable to >5 times higher DNA dose without EP. After a single protein boost, sera from baboons in groups 2 and 5 effectively inhibited the oocyst development (100% in both groups 2 and 5), and the prevalence of mosquito infectivity was 53% (group 2) and 15% (group 5). Sera from group 1 (control) did not inhibit mosquito infectivity. These results further demonstrate the contribution of both EP immunization and heterologous protein boost to achieve functionally effective anti-Pfs25 antibody titers.
Table 1.
Determination of transmission blocking activity by MFA in sera from baboons immunized with DNA vaccines followed by protein boost
| Serum | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Human | Oocyst no. | Mean
|
20 | 22.4 | 9.1 | 19.2 | 28.7 |
| Median | 9 | 19 | 4 | 14.5 | 15 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| Infected/total mosq. | 25/25 | 11/13 | 15/18 | 8/10 | 21/22 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| Pre-immune | Oocyst no. | Mean
|
19.3 | 11.7 | 6.8 | 19.4 | 39.7 |
| Median | 6 | 11 | 4 | 14 | 22.5 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| Infected/total mosq. | 61/72 | 34/38 | 57/68 | 45/49 | 57/63 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| B4 | Oocyst no. | Mean
|
15.4 | 9.6 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 9.2 |
| Median | 7 | 5.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| Infected/total mosq. | 61/77 | 26/34 | 35/39 | 29/46 | 28/46 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| TBA (%)* | - | 50 | 50 | 86 | 91 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| B6 | Oocyst no. | Mean
|
17.6 | 2 | NB | NB | 0.46 |
| Median | 5 | 0 | NB | NB | 0 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| Infected/total mosq. | 43/61 | 17/32 | NB | NB | 7/48 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| TBA (%) | - | 100 | - | - | 100 | ||
|
|
|||||||
| P-value | NS | <0.0001 | 0.03 | 0.0007 | <0.0001 | ||
NB-Not boosted with recombinant protein
NS-Not significant
TBA(%) was calculated using median oocyst values obtained with pre-immune and immune sera (B4 and B6 bleeds).
3.5. In vivo transmission blocking assessment
Baboon sera were also evaluated using a murine (P. berghei) transgenic parasites (Pfs25trPb) expressing Pfs25 protein [29] model and results compared with those with standard MFA (above). Fig. 5 shows pooled results for sera from four baboons per vaccine group tested individually. Sera from animals immunized (with or without EP) with DNA vaccine encoding Pfs25 revealed strong transmission reduction using the in vivo model. These results are in agreement with those with MFA except that EP group had shown slightly higher blocking activity in MFA. In agreement with MFA data, a protein boost resulted in further improved transmission reduction in both groups (with or without EP).
Fig. 5.
Evaluation of transmission blocking activity using Pfs25TrPb-murine model. Mice were infected with Pfs25TrPb (106, I/P) parasites. On day 4 mosquitoes were allowed to feed on Pfs25TrPb-infected mice to give a measure of total transmission before (B) passive immunization with various sera. After mosquito infection, 200 μl of sera from each immunized animal was infected IV and mice rested for 15 min. to allow equilibration of antibodies. New mosquitoes from the same batch were allowed to feed on each mouse after (A) administration of various sera. Top panel shows results on sera before protein boost (B4 bleeds) and the bottom panel shown sera after the protein boost (B6) bleeds. Two pre-immune sera (PB) were tested individually. Likewise sera from group 2(no EP) and group 5 (EP) were tested individually.
3.6 Reactogenicity and toxicity of vaccination in Olive baboons
All monkeys maintained good body condition and agility throughout, body temperatures were within clinical ranges (36.6–39°C) and their body weights had slight variations from the baseline weights, though the differences were not statistically significant. Most baboons did not experience any muscle transient induration, granulomas, abscesses, ulcers, cutaneous erythema and skin swelling at the injection/vaccination sites. Animals in group 2 (no EP) showed inguinal lymphadenopathy ipsilateral with the immunization but it receded with time. There were no other clinical adverse signs and when necessary iron supplements were administered to animals in all the 5 groups to maintain normal haematocrits. Thus DNA vaccines delivered via EP in the olive baboon were safe and well tolerated.
4. Discussion
Despite the undisputed evidence that Pfs25 is an effective candidate for a vaccine to block malaria transmission by mosquitoes, studies with adjuvanted recombinant Pfs25 expressed in Pichia pastoris have shown measurable but weak immunogenicity in healthy volunteers [13, 30, 31]. Reasons for poor immunogenicity are not obvious, however, it is believed that conformational folding of protein is critical for functionally effective immunogenicity. Production of a correctly folded recombinant protein still remains a major challenge. Our laboratory has focused on a DNA vaccine based approach for Pfs25 with stronger immunogenicity as an alternative to recombinant protein expression. A successful malaria TBV is considered to play critical roles in the global malaria eliminations and eradication goal.
Evaluation of DNA vaccines encoding Pfs25 and Pvs25 (a P. vivax homologue) had revealed potent immunogenicity in mice [16, 32], however in non-human primates, DNA vaccines required a heterologous protein boost for functionally effective immunogenicity [18]. In vivo EP method of delivery resulted in 2-log higher immunogenicity of DNA vaccine in mice [19]. The studies presented here revealed significantly improved immunogenicity of Pfs25 DNA vaccine by EP method of delivery in baboons. Comparison of EP to conventional I.M. delivery indicated that EP resulted in 4-fold higher antibody titers. EP delivery induced anti-Pfs25 responses after fewer immunizations, even at lower DNA doses, compared to higher doses of IM injection alone, suggesting that EP delivery of Pfs25 DNA vaccine may enable favorable reductions in the DNA dose and or the number of immunizations required to achieve target level of immune response.
DNA vaccines have exhibited sub-optimal immunogenicity in non-human primate models [33,] and in human clinical trials [34], highlighting the need for more effective immune enhancement strategies. Delivery of DNA vaccine by EP and prime-boost immunization strategy have revealed encouraging results [18, 19]. In our study, priming with DNA vaccines with or without EP followed by protein boosting resulted in significantly increased antibody responses (1:640,000) and enhanced protection. Vaccination via EP followed by boosting with protein showed potent efficacy in the inhibition of oocyst development (100%) and reduction in mosquito infectivity. Superior immunogenicity by EP method was further corroborated by a five-fold-dose sparing effect in terms of antibody titers as well as transmission blocking results. Antibodies produced in response to DNA vaccination recognized native Pfs25 in the parasites and support that Pfs25 protein molecules expressed in the mammalian cells were likely to be in their functional native conformation. Our results do emphasize rather drastic effects on antibody titers correlating with higher avidity of antibodies and enhanced functional activity in ex vivo MFA and in vivo assays employed.
Though ex vivo MFA is the most commonly used assay to assess transmission blocking activity, results presented in this study provide strong support for using the in vivo murine model [29] in future studies. Infected mice receiving anti-Pfs25 antibodies showed profound inhibition of the development of oocysts, which was comparable in both the groups without EP (92%) and with EP (83%) in DNA vaccinations, while single protein boost improved the transmission blocking efficacy with EP (100 %) and without EP (95%). Comparison of results in the MFA and in in vivo model did reveal some discrepancies. For example MFA revealed higher activity of sera from the EP groups, the murine model did not show such difference. While we do not know the reasons, it could result from quantitative differences in the actual amount of antibodies available for blocking in the MFA versus from direct feeding on mice infected with Pfs25TrPb and passively immunized with immune baboon prior to mosquito transmission.
Evaluation of human malaria vaccines requires experimental animal models that mimic malaria disease comparable to humans [35]. Baboons share similarities with humans that include a 28-day menstrual cycle, a flat discoid placenta and hormonal profiles allowing for malaria in pregnancy studies, and their large body size allowing frequent sampling for any clinical observation [36–38]. They are abundant and are not among the endangered NHPs in Kenya. Additionally, they are susceptible to experimental infection with P. knowlesi [35, 39–43] and recently we have also reported on the immunogenicity evaluation of P. falciparum TBV antigen Pfs48/45 [8]. Baboons also provide an alternate nonhuman primate model for evaluation of human vaccines under development. Our own results using baboons in the present study are highly encouraging and provide a strong rationale for further evaluation of malaria transmission blocking DNA vaccine in humans.
Highlight.
We evaluated DNA vaccine encoding Pfs25, a malaria vaccine candidate antigen.
DNA delivery by in vivo electroporation in baboons elicited functional antibodies.
DNA prime and protein boost further enhanced blocking antibody response.
We also validated Pfs25TrPb-murine model for future evaluation of antibodies.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Fredrick Maloba for veterinary care and animal care staff members who cared for the animals. These studies were supported by an NIH grant AI47089 and funds from JHMRI.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.WHO report 2010: World Health Organization 2010 Global malaria program. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241564106/en/index.html. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumar N. A vaccine to prevent transmission of human malaria: A long way to travel on a dusty and often bumpy road. Current science. 2007;92:1535–44. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pradel G. Proteins of the malaria parasite sexual stages: expression, function and potential for transmission blocking strategies. Parasitology. 2007;134:1911–29. doi: 10.1017/S0031182007003381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hill AV. Vaccines against malaria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Oct;12:2806–14. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williamson KC, Keister DB, Muratova O, Kaslow DC. Recombinant Pfs230, a Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte protein, induces antisera that reduce the infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum to mosquitoes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995;75:33–42. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(95)02507-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Outchkourov NS, et al. Correctly folded Pfs48/45 protein of Plasmodium falciparum elicits malaria transmission-blocking immunity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4301–305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800459105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gozar MM, Price VL, Kaslow DC. Saccharomyces cerevisiae-secreted fusion proteins Pfs25 and Pfs28 elicit potent Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking antibodies in mice. Infect Immun. 1998;66:59–64. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.1.59-64.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chowdhury DR, Angov E, Kariuki T, Kumar N. A potent malaria transmission blocking vaccine based on codon harmonized full length Pfs48/45 expressed in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kaslow DC, Quakyi IA, Syin C, Raum MG, Keister DB, Coligan JE, McCutchan TF, Miller LH. A vaccine candidate from the sexual stage of human malaria that contains EGF-like domains. Nature. 1988;333:74–6. doi: 10.1038/333074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zou L, Miles AP, Wang J, Stowers AW. Expression of malaria transmission-blocking vaccine antigen Pfs25 in Pichia pastoris for use in human clinical trials. Vaccine. 2003;21:1650–57. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00701-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaslow DC, Bathurst IC, Lensen T, Ponnudurai T, Barr PJ, Keister DB. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recombinant Pfs25 adsorbed to alum elicits antibodies that block transmission of Plasmodium falciparum. Infect Immun. 1994;62:5576–80. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.12.5576-5580.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu Y, Przysiecki C, Flanagan E, Bello-Irizarry SN, Ionescu R, Muratova O, Dobrescu G, Lambert L, Keister D, Rippeon Y, Long CA, Shi L, Caulfield M, Shaw A, Saul A, Shiver J, Miller LH. Sustained high-titer antibody responses induced by conjugating a malarial vaccine candidate to outer-membrane protein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18243–48. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608545103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kubler-Kielb J, Majadly F, Wu Y, Narum DL, Guo C, Miller LH, Shiloach J, Robbins JB, Schneerson R. Long-lasting and transmission-blocking activity of antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum elicited in mice by protein conjugates of Pfs25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:293–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609885104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qian F, Rausch KM, Muratova O, Zhou H, Song G, Diouf A, Lambert L, Narum DL, Wu Y, Saul A, Miller LH, Long CA, Mullen GE. Addition of CpG ODN to recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoProtein A conjugates of AMA1 and Pfs25 greatly increases the number of responders. Vaccine. 2008;26:2521–27. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu Y, et al. Phase 1 trial of malaria transmission blocking vaccine candidates Pfs25 and Pvs25 formulated with montanide ISA 51. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lobo CA, Dhar R, Kumar N. Immunization of mice with DNA-based Pfs25 elicits potent malaria transmission-blocking antibodies. Infect Immun. 1999;67:1688–93. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.4.1688-1693.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coban C, Ishii KJ, Stowers AW, Keister DB, Klinman DM, Kumar N. Effect of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides on the immunogenicity of Pfs25, a Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking vaccine antigen. Infect Immun. 2004;72:584–88. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.584-588.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Coban C, Philipp MT, Purcell JE, Keister DB, Okulate M, Martin DS, Kumar N. Induction of Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking antibodies in nonhuman primates by a combination of DNA and protein immunizations. Infect Immun. 2004;72:253–59. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.253-259.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.LeBlanc R, Vasquez Y, Hannaman D, Kumar N. Markedly enhanced immunogenicity of a Pfs25 DNA-based malaria transmission-blocking vaccine by in vivo electroporation. Vaccine. 2008;26:185–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Costa SM, Paes MV, Barreto DF, Pinhao AT, Barth OM, Queiroz JL, Armoa GR, Freire MS, Alves AM. Protection against dengue type 2 virus induced in mice immunized with a DNA plasmid encoding the non-structural 1 (NS1) gene fused to the tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence. Vaccine. 2006;24:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J. 1982;1:841–845. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cemazar M, Sersa G. Electrotransfer of therapeutic molecules into tissues. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2007;9:554–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Widera G, Austin M, Rabussay D, Goldbeck C, Barnett SW, et al. Increased DNA vaccine delivery and immunogenicity by electroporation in vivo. J Immunol. 2000;164:4635–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bachy M, Boudet F, Bureau M, Girerd-Chambaz Y, Wils P, Scherman D, Meric C. Electric pulses increase the immunogenicity of an influenza DNA vaccine injected intramuscularly in the mouse. Vaccine. 2001;19:1688–93. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00406-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Babiuk S, Baca-Estrada ME, Foldvari M, Middleton DM, Rabussay D, et al. Increased gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration caused by electroporation are both important for improving the efficacy of DNA vaccines. J Biotechnol. 2004;110:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu J, Kjeken R, Mathiesen I, Barouch DH. Recruitment of antigen presenting cells to the site of inoculation and augmentation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA vaccine immunogenicity by in vivo electroporation. J Virol. 2008;82:5643–49. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02564-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ifediba T, Vanderberg JP. Complete in vitro maturation of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes. Nature. 1981;294:364–366. doi: 10.1038/294364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vermeulen AN, Ponnudurai T, Lensen AH, Roeffen WF, Meuwissen JE. The purification of Plasmodium falciparum macrogametes and/or zygotes prepared from in vitro cultures. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77:753–55. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90280-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mlambo G, Macial J, Kumar N. Murine model for assessment of Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking vaccine using transgenic Plasmodium berghei parasites expressing the target antigen Pfs25. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2018–24. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01409-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaslow DC. 2002 Transmission-blocking vaccines. Chem Immunol. 2002;80:287–307. doi: 10.1159/000058850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vogel G. The ‘do unto others’ malaria vaccine. Science. 2010;328:847–48. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5980.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kongkasuriyachai D, Bartels-Andrews L, Stowers A, Collins WE, Sullivan J, Sattabongkot J, Torii M, Tsuboi T, Kumar N. Potent immunogenicity of DNA vaccines encoding Plasmodium vivax transmission-blocking vaccine candidates Pvs25 and Pvs28 evaluation of homologous and heterologous antigen-delivery-prime boost strategy. Vaccine. 2004;22:3205–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Polack FP, Lydy SL, Lee SH, Rota PA, Bellini WJ, Adams RJ, Robinson HL, Griffin DE. Poor immune responses of newborn rhesus macaques to measles virus DNA vaccines expressing the hemagglutinin and fusion glycoproteins. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 doi: 10.1128/CVI.00394-12. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.MacGregor RR, Boyer JD, Ugen KE, Lacy KE, Gluckman SJ, Bagarazzi ML, et al. First human trial of a DNA-based vaccine for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection: safety and host response. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:92–100. doi: 10.1086/515613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nyawira T, Gicheru H, Kagasi E, Ng’ang’a Z, Ozwara H. Acute Plasmodium knowlesi infection in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis) is accompanied by high-level of gamma interferon. Intern J Biol. 2012;4:92–101. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fidock DA, Rosenthal PJ, Croft SL, Brun R, Nwaka S. Antimalarial drug discovery: efficacy models for compound screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:509–20. doi: 10.1038/nrd1416. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wykes MN, Good MF. What have we learnt from mouse models for the study of malaria? Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:2004–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939552. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.D’Hooghe TM, Kyama CM, Chai D, Fassbender A, Vodolazkaia A, Bokor A, Mwenda JM. Nonhuman primate models for translational research in endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:152–61. doi: 10.1177/1933719108322430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ozwara H, Langermans JA, Maamun J, Farah IO, Yole DS, Mwenda JM, Weiler H, Thomas AW. Experimental infection of the olive baboon (Paplio anubis) with Plasmodium knowlesi: severe disease accompanied by cerebral involvement. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:188–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ichagichu M, Ngotho M, Karanja SM, Kokwaro G, Kariuki T, Nzila A, Ozwara H. Preclinical drug evaluation system in the Plasmodium knowlesi baboon model of malaria: the methotrexate study. J Med Primatol. 2013 doi: 10.1111/jmp.12034. (Epub) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sabbatani S, Fiorino S, Manfredi R. The emerging of the fifth malaria parasite (Plasmodium knowlesi): a public health concern? Braz J Infect Dis. 2010;14(3):299–309. Review. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee KS, Divis PC, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, Cox-Singh J, Singh B. Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002015. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sabbatani S, Fiorino S, Manfredi R. Plasmodium knowlesi: from Malaysia, a novel health care threat. Infez Med. 2012;20:5–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




