Summary
Septins are a large, evolutionarily conserved family of GTPases that form hetero-oligomers and interact with the actin-based cytoskeleton and microtubules. They are involved in scaffolding functions, and form diffusion barriers in budding yeast, the sperm flagellum and the base of primary cilia of kidney epithelial cells. We investigated the role of septins in the primary cilium of retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells, and found that SEPT2 forms a 1:1:1 complex with SEPT7 and SEPT9 and that the three members of this complex colocalize along the length of the axoneme. Similar to observations in kidney epithelial cells, depletion of cilium-localized septins by siRNA-based approaches inhibited ciliogenesis. MAP4, which is a binding partner of SEPT2 and controls the accessibility of septins to microtubules, was also localized to the axoneme where it appeared to negatively regulate ciliary length. Taken together, our data provide new insights into the functions and regulation of septins and MAP4 in the organization of the primary cilium and microtubule-based activities in cells.
Key words: Primary cilium, Septins, MAP4, Microtubules, Actin
Introduction
Septins are a highly conserved family of small GTPases that form hetero-oligomers that assemble into filaments, rings and spirals. Originally, septins were identified as important regulators of cytokinesis in organisms ranging from yeast to mammals. In yeast, septins assemble at the neck between the mother and daughter bud into interlocking rings that form a barrier to the lateral diffusion of proteins and mRNAs from the mother to the daughter cell, and a scaffold for the assembly of the contractile ring. In mammals, septins localize to the cleavage furrow and midbody, and perturbation of septin functions leads to cytokinesis defects (reviewed by Saarikangas and Barral, 2011; Mostowy and Cossart, 2012).
In mammals, septins have been linked to scaffolding functions with the cytoskeleton. In most cells, septins colocalize with actin stress fibers in cells in interphase and with cortical actin at the cleavage furrow during mitosis (reviewed by Saarikangas and Barral, 2011; Mostowy and Cossart, 2012). Septins also colocalize with, and bind to subpopulations of microtubules, and regulate microtubule stability, post-translational modifications and microtubule-vesicle interactions (reviewed by Spiliotis, 2010). Septin 2 (SEPT2) directly interacts with MAP4, a ubiquitously expressed microtubule-associated protein (MAP) of the MAP2/TAU family, which positively regulates polymerization/stability of cytoplasmic microtubules. MAP4, which directly binds and bundles microtubules (reviewed by Holmfeldt et al., 2009), is thought to regulate septin-microtubule interactions (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008) (reviewed by Spiliotis, 2010). Septins also associate with sub-domains of the plasma membrane by binding phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and, thereby, participate in mitosis, vesicular trafficking and morphogenesis of neurons (reviewed by Saarikangas and Barral, 2011; Mostowy and Cossart, 2012). Several septin binding partners have been identified including non-muscle myosin II and annillin in cytokinesis (Oegema et al., 2000; Kinoshita et al., 2002; Joo et al., 2007), and the sec6/sec8 subunits of the exocyst complex (Hsu et al., 1998). Finally, septins are also involved in the formation of cage-like structures around intracellular bacteria indicating that they also participate in host defense against pathogens (Mostowy et al., 2010).
Septins organize lateral membrane diffusion barriers between the ciliary compartment and the surrounding plasma membrane in the sperm flagellum (Kissel et al., 2005; Ihara et al., 2005), primary cilium (Hu et al., 2010) and motile cilia (Kim et al., 2010b) (reviewed by Hu and Nelson, 2011). Flagella and cilia are highly conserved structures in eukaryotes that are involved in sensing and transducing environmental cues (primary and motile cilia), the movement of fluids (motile cilia), and in cell motility (motile cilia and flagella). Cilia are composed of a bundle of microtubules, termed the axoneme, which is assembled from a modified centriole called the basal body. The assembly of the cilium (ciliogenesis) is a complex process that requires an evolutionarily conserved machinery termed intraflagellar transport (IFT). The IFT machinery is thought to select, import and transport ciliary components (IFT particles or trains) into and along the axoneme towards the assembling distal end of the axoneme; this kinesin-based anterograde transport is balanced by dynein-dependent retrograde transport of IFT trains back to the basal body (reviewed by Pedersen et Rosenbaum, 2008; Ishikawa and Marshall, 2011).
The primary cilium, a specific subtype of sensory non-motile cilia, is present in most cells in vertebrates during development and in the adult depending on the cell type. The primary cilium controls key signaling pathways during development and tissue homeostasis. This was clearly demonstrated by the identification of genes mutated in complex genetic diseases associated with polycystic kidney, retinal degeneration, polydactyly and obesity that are generally referred to as ciliopathies (reviewed by Hildebrandt et al., 2011). Many, if not all the proteins encoded by these genes are localized near the basal body, the transition zone or within the primary cilium. The transition zone includes the region where the basal body is docked onto the cellular membrane, and extends distally to link microtubule doublets to the ciliary membrane by Y-shaped molecular links (Gilula and Satir, 1972). The transition zone may form a molecular filter between the ciliary compartment and the cytoplasm similar to the role of the nuclear pore complex (reviewed by Hu and Nelson, 2011; Ishikawa and Marshall, 2011). Septins form a ring-shaped structure at the base of cilia (Hu et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010b; Chih et al., 2012). This localization is in agreement with a putative septin-based diffusion barrier at the transition zone. In addition, retention at the plasma membrane has been proposed to explain exclusion of membrane proteins from the cilium (Francis et al., 2011). SEPT2 is also required for ciliogenesis (Hu et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010b; Chih et al., 2012), thereby linking septins to ciliary function and morphogenesis.
To further characterize these new functions of septins in the primary cilium, we investigated the distribution of septins in human telomerase-immortalized retinal pigment epithelial [hTERT-RPE-1 (RPE1)] cells, one of the most widely used models to study ciliogenesis. We found that in RPE1 cells SEPT2 forms a 1:1:1 complex with SEPT7 and SEPT9, that this complex localizes along the entire length of the axoneme, and that it positively controls ciliogenesis and the length of cilia. MAP4 is also localized to the axoneme, and negatively regulates ciliary length and therefore appears to antagonize the function of septins in the cilium.
Results
SEPT2, SEPT7, SEPT9 form a complex and localize to the primary cilium
SEPT2 forms a diffusion barrier at the base of the primary cilium in murine kidney (IMCD3) cells and fibroblasts (Hu et al., 2010; Chih et al., 2012; Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2011). In IMCD3 cells, SEPT2 is also distributed along the axoneme in a minor proportion of the cells (Hu et al., 2010). To further characterize septins at the primary cilium, we analyzed the distribution and function of septins in RPE1 cells, a widely used in vitro cell model for ciliogenesis.
RPE1 cells were grown to confluency and then transferred to low serum medium for 24 hours to induce ciliogenesis. Under these conditions, 80% of the cells formed a cilium (Molla-Herman et al., 2010), which was identified as a 3–4 µm rod that stained for acetylated tubulin (AcTub). To identify septin complexes in these cells, lysates from ciliated cells expressing SEPT2–S-tag–GFP were sequentially precipitated with GFP antibodies followed by S-beads, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE using silver staining (Fig. 1A) and western blotting (Fig. 1B). The results show that SEPT2 is present in an apparently equimolar complex of SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 in ciliated RPE1 cells.
The localization of the SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 complex was then investigated in ciliated RPE1 cells. In ciliated (and in non-ciliated RPE1 cells) septins were organized as cytoplasmic fibers (Fig. 1C) that colocalized with actin filaments throughout the cell (see below). In addition, in the great majority of ciliated cells (see below), SEPT2, SEPT7 and SEPT9 colocalized with AcTub (Fig. 1C), indicating their presence in the primary cilium. Similar results were obtained in ARPE19 cells, another human RPE cell lines (supplementary material Fig. S1). SEPT9_v1 fused with Tomato (SEPT9–tomato) and transiently expressed in RPE1 cells also colocalized with AcTub in the primary cilium in fixed cells (data not shown). In live cells, SEPT9–tomato also colocalized with the somatostatin receptor type 3 (SSTR3–GFP; see below), a ciliary membrane marker (Händel et al., 1999; Berbari et al., 2008; Hu et al., 2010), showing that its localization to the primary cilium was not a fixation artifact. Altogether, these results indicate that a specific complex of septins (SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9) localized to the primary cilium in RPE cells.
Septins are present at the axoneme of cilia in situ
The presence of septins at the axoneme of cilia in situ was then further analyzed by immunohistochemistry of various human tissues. As shown in Fig. 2A, SEPT2 was abundant in the photoreceptor layer of the human retina in both the outer nuclear layer and the outer plexiform layer, which contains the presynaptic terminals of photoreceptor cells. SEPT2 colocalized with centrin3 a marker of the connecting cilium, the basal body and the adjacent daughter centriole of photoreceptor cells (Fig. 2A, bottom part). SEPT2 was also present in spots surrounding the daughter centriole but the significance of this staining remains to be determined. Moreover, we found staining of SEPT2 in the photoreceptor outer segments (Fig. 2A), which represent ciliary modifications. In addition, to SEPT2 in the retina, SEPT9 colocalized with AcTub at primary cilia of kidney tubule epithelial cells (Fig. 2B) and cilia of bronchus multiciliated epithelial cells (Fig. 2C); similar results were obtained for SEPT7 (data not shown). Thus, septins are components of the axoneme of primary cilia in RPE cell lines in vitro and in cilia of different tissues in vivo.
Septins accumulate in the axoneme of long mature primary cilia in RPE1 cells
Because localization of septins within axonemes was not detected in all ciliated RPE1 cells (see below) and only in a minor proportion of the primary cilia in IMCD3 epithelial cells (Hu et al., 2010), we investigated whether the incorporation of septins into the primary cilium was dependent on state of cilium maturation.
The expression of some ciliary proteins is upregulated during ciliogenesis owing to a specific transcription program controlled by the RFX transcription factors family (reviewed by Thomas et al., 2010). Therefore, we examined the expression level of SEPT2/7/9 during ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells grown in the presence of serum, or in low serum for 24 or 48 hours. As shown in Fig. 3A, expression of SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 was not significantly modified upon ciliogenesis, a result in agreement with the observations that the overall cytoplasmic network of septins appears similar in ciliated and non-ciliated cells and that septins at the cilium probably represents a very minor pool of the total cellular septins.
Next, we examined septin localization in the primary cilium at different times after withdrawal of serum and, thereby, different lengths of cilia. RPE1 cells were grown in a low serum concentration for 6 hours (∼1 µm primary cilium; Fig. 3B) and 48 hours (∼4 µm primary cilium; Fig. 3C), fixed and stained for AcTub and SEPT9 (Fig. 3). Although SEPT9 was absent from the axoneme of short ‘young’ cilia (6 hours, Fig. 3B), long ‘mature’ primary cilia (48 hours) had strong septin staining (Fig. 2C; >80% of septin-positive cilia, see below). Similar results were obtained for SEPT7 (supplementary material Fig. S2A). Therefore, septins accumulate in long, mature primary cilia. This observation was confirmed in live RPE1 cells that transiently co-expressed SEPT9–tomato and SSTR3–GFP. Forty-eight hours after serum starvation, a mixture of short and long primary cilia were detected in the cell population (Fig. 2D,E). Similar to endogenous SEPT9, SEPT9–tomato was absent or only stained the base of short primary cilia (Fig. 3D), whereas it decorated the length of long primary cilia (Fig. 3E). Note, however, that SEPT9–tomato (Fig. 3E, arrowheads) did not appear to localize at the tip of primary cilia. Similar observations were made using a SEPT2–GFP fusion (data not shown). These results indicate that septins accumulate in mature primary cilia by a process that probably depends on their gradual accumulation during ciliogenesis.
Septins colocalized with AcTub within the axoneme of long mature cilia (Figs 1, 3). To examine whether septins were present at other regions of the primary cilium, we compared the distribution of SEPT9 to that of markers of the axoneme (AcTub), basal body (γ-tubulin) and transition zone (NPHP1). Whereas SEPT9 colocalized with AcTub, we detected little or no colocalization with any of the other markers (Fig. 3F). Three-dimensional reconstruction of deconvoluted images clearly showed an almost complete overlap between AcTub and SEPT7 (Fig. 3G) indicating that septins accumulate all along the axoneme of long, mature cilia in RPE1 cells.
Localization of septins to the primary cilium of RPE-1 cells is independent of actin polymerization
Septins colocalize with actin cables throughout the cytoplasm in almost all non-dividing cell types, and with stable cytoplasmic microtubules in Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells and other cell types (reviewed by Spiliotis, 2010). We compared the distribution of septins, the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules in RPE1 cells; SEPT2, SEPT7 and SEPT9 had identical distributions (see Fig. 1), so we show a detailed analysis of SEPT7 (Fig. 4), although similar observations were made with SEPT9 (supplementary material Fig. S3, and data not shown). In non-ciliated interphase RPE1 cells, SEPT7 colocalized with actin filaments (stress fibers) but not with cytoplasmic AcTub-positive microtubules (supplementary material Fig. S2B). During mitosis, SEPT7 colocalized with filamentous actin at the cell cortex and at the cleavage furrow, but not with microtubules at the mitotic spindle or midbody (supplementary material Fig. S2C, arrows). In ciliated RPE1 cells, SEPT7 mainly localized with actin filaments in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4A,a), but not with the general microtubule population (Fig. 4A,b) except within the cilium (Fig. 4Ac). Therefore, it appears that in RPE1 cells, septins mainly colocalize with actin filaments in the cytoplasm, and with microtubules in the cilium.
The polymerization state or contractility of the actin-based cytoskeleton were shown recently to be involved in ciliogenesis (Kim et al., 2010a; Bershteyn et al., 2010; Pitaval et al., 2010). Because the distribution of septins on cytoplasmic filaments depends on actin polymerization (Kinoshita et al., 2002), we tested the role of actin polymerization on the localization of septins to the primary cilium. Disruption of actin filaments using cytochalasin D resulted in a dramatic change in the distribution of cytoplasmic septin filaments into ring-like structures that colocalized with actin aggregates (Fig. 4B), as previously described (Kinoshita et al., 2002). However, addition of cytochalasin D did not affect SEPT7 localization in the primary cilium (Fig. 4B). When non-muscle myosin II was inhibited by blebbistatin, cytoplasmic septins filaments were shorter and their staining at the cortex increased, whereas staining of septins in the primary cilium was again unaffected (supplementary material Fig. S3). Thus, the actin-based cytoskeleton does not appear to be involved directly in the steady state localization of septins at the cilium.
Primary cilium-associated septins are stable, and non-dynamic
Since the axoneme forms the rails for the IFT trains, we examined whether or not axonemal septins are involved in IFT-like movements. RPE1 cells co-expressing SSTR3–GFP and SEPT9–tomato were imaged by live-cell fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5A). SEPT9–tomato colocalized with SSTR3–GFP in cilia in live cells and was uniformly distributed along the length of cilia (Fig. 5A, arrows) as observed in fixed cells (Figs 1, 2). SEPT2–GFP also localized along the length of the cilium (Fig. 5B–D, and data not shown). These distributions are different from the more punctate organization of IFT particles that move within the cilium and accumulate at the basal body and/or the distal tip (review by Pedersen and Rosenbaum, 2008; Ishikawa et Marshall, 2011).
To further explore the organization of septins in the primary cilium, we investigated their dynamics using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). We first tested whether septins within the axoneme exchanged with the cytoplasmic pool. RPE1 cells co-expressing pericentrin–RFP to identify the basal body, and SEPT2–GFP were imaged by live-cell fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5B–D). Following photobleaching (Fig. 5B; white boxes), the recovery rate of primary-cilium-associated SEPT2–GFP fluorescence (arrows) was compared to that of cytoplasmic septin filaments (arrowheads). Whereas fluorescence of the cytoplasmic pool of septins recovered slowly over 4 minutes, SEPT2–GFP fluorescence in the primary cilium did not, even when the recovery time was extended to more than 50 minutes. Similar results were obtained using the SEPT9–tomato fusion (supplementary material Fig. S5). These data indicate that in addition to being associated with distinct structures, cytoplasmic and cilium-associated septins represent different dynamic pools that do not appear to exchange with each other.
To test whether septins are dynamic within primary cilium, SEPT2–GFP was photobleached in the distal (Fig. 5C) or proximal (Fig. 5D) domain of the primary cilium. The photobleached regions of SEPT2–GFP did not appear to recover fluorescence. Since the fluorescence of SEPT2–GFP in short, immature primary cilia was very weak, we were unable to analyze septin dynamics in those cilia. Nevertheless, the results in mature primary cilia indicate that septins are not dynamic and may be a structural component of the axoneme.
Septins are required for ciliogenesis and control cilium length in RPE1 cells
To test the functions of septins during ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells, we use the septin targeting drug Forchlorfenuron which induces the assembly of large septins structures and perturbs septin dynamics without affecting either actin or tubulin polymerization (Hu et al., 2008). While treatment of RPE1 cells with 50 µM Pestanal during ciliogenesis significantly reduced the percentage of ciliated cells (supplementary material Fig. S4A–C), a short treatment, of 4 hours, of ciliated cells only moderately affected ciliogenesis without perturbing the localization of septins to the axoneme (supplementary material Fig. S4D,E). Thus these results indicate that a dynamic septin network is necessary for ciliogenesis.
To more specifically investigate the role of each septin isoform in ciliogenesis we then used previously characterized siRNA sequences to knockdown expression of SEPT7 (Kremer et al., 2005) or SEPT9 (Mostowy et al., 2010), and a luciferase targeting sequence as a negative control. The efficiency and specificity of the knockdown was assessed by western blotting of septins, using the ubiquitously expressed clathrin-adaptor complex AP-1 as a control (Fig. 6A). Two different SEPT7 siRNAs efficiently knocked down expression of SEPT7, and resulted in efficient downregulation of both SEPT2 and SEPT9. SEPT9 targeting siRNA also efficiently knocked down SEPT9 expression, but had little effect on either SEPT2 or SEPT7 expression, as recently observed (see Discussion). These results were confirmed by immunofluorescence (Fig. 6B), and identify the key function of SEPT7 in the overall stability of septin complexes (see Discussion).
The effect of septin depletion on ciliogenesis was investigated in RPE1 cells by immunofluorescence, and the proportion of ciliated cells and length of primary cilium were quantified based on AcTub staining, as described previously (Molla-Herman et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2010). The percentage of cells with cilia was normalized to controls (normalized ciliogenesis). Depletion of SEPT7 significantly inhibited ciliogenesis (49.9±14.2% of control; Fig. 6B,C) and the primary cilia that formed were shorter than those in control-siRNA-treated cells (1.81±0.61 µm versus 2.71±0.83 µm for control; Fig. 6D). Depletion of SEPT9 resulted in limited effects on the formation of cilia (92.9±10.7% of control; Fig. 6C). However, primary cilia in SEPT9-depleted cells were shorter than in control cells (1.69±0.52 µm versus 3.0±0.78 µm in controls; Fig. 6D), similar to SEPT7-siRNA-treated cells (Fig. 6D). These results indicate that the SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 complex plays a role in ciliogenesis, and that SEPT9 is required to form long cilia.
The septin binding partner MAP4 localizes to the primary cilium and controls cilium length
To investigate the role of septins in controlling ciliogenesis and the length of the cilia, we focused on the possible role of MAP4 because it has been shown to regulate microtubule–septin interactions and function (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008). MAP4 is a ubiquitously expressed MAP of the MAP2/TAU family that increases the assembly and stability of cytoplasmic microtubules (reviewed by Holmfeldt et al., 2009). However, neither the localization of MAP4 in primary cilia nor its functions in ciliogenesis have been examined.
Endogenous MAP4 colocalized with AcTub in the primary cilia of RPE1 cells fixed in either methanol (Fig. 7A), which allowed co-staining of MAP4 and cytoplasmic microtubules, or paraformaldehyde (Fig. 7B). Similar results were obtained in human primary foreskin fibroblasts (supplementary material Fig. S6). We also examined the localization of a GFP fusion of a truncation mutant of MAP4, which encodes amino acid (aa) 800–1152 (GFP–MAP4m) and includes most of the proline-rich domain and the affinity domain (termed PRD and AD, respectively). This mutant has been used in functional studies where it was shown to bind and stabilize microtubules (Nguyen et al., 1997; Perez et al., 1999). GFP–MAP4m colocalized with AcTub in the primary cilia of all ciliated GFP–MAP4m-expressing cells (Fig. 7C). This result confirms observations made with the MAP4 antibody, and indicates that the C-terminal microtubule-binding domain of MAP4 (PRD and AD) contains a primary cilium-targeting domain. Additional localization analysis using myc-tagged deletion mutants of MAP4 confirmed that the PRD (aa 654–895) contains the primary cilium-targeting domain, therefore, indicating that this motif is present between aa 800 and 895 of MAP4 (supplementary material Fig. S7).
Localization of MAP4 at cilia in vivo was also investigated in the human retina, in a similar manner to that for SEPT2 (Fig. 2). Analyses of parallel sections by immunofluorescence double labeling of anti-MAP4 and centrin3 in human retinal sections also revealed colocalization of MAP4 and centrin3 (Fig. 7D) at the connecting cilium and the basal body. MAP4 was also present in the outer segment with a linear distribution, indicating its localization along the axoneme (arrows). Together with results presented in Fig. 2A, these results show the expression of SEPT2 and MAP4 in the same subciliary compartments of retinal photoreceptor cells.
The role of MAP4 in ciliogenesis was investigated using an siRNA-based approach in RPE1 cells. Two previously characterized MAP4-targeting siRNA (Holmfeldt et al., 2007) were used in RPE1 cells, and their effects on MAP4 expression, ciliogenesis and cilium length were analyzed by immunofluorescence as described above for septins. The two siRNAs efficiently knocked down MAP4 expression with similar efficiencies (Fig. 8A). In general, ciliogenesis was only moderately affected in MAP4-depleted cells compared to control siRNA-treated cells {83.1±7.9% [siMAP4(1)] and 92.9±11.3% [siMAP4(2)] of control; Fig. 8B and C} although the primary cilia that formed in MAP4-depleted cells were ∼1.1 µm longer than in control cells {4.27 [siMAP4(1)] and 4.29 [MAP4(2)] versus 3.15 µm for control, Fig. 8D}. Importantly, depletion of MAP4 did not affect the expression of septins (supplementary material Fig. S8) (see also Kremer et al., 2005). These results show that MAP4 is a component of the primary cilium, and that its presence may be required to limit the growth of the axoneme.
MAP4 competes with septins at the axoneme
It was described previously that MAP4 negatively regulates interaction of septins with microtubules (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008). In addition, MAP4 is present at the axoneme of human primary fibroblasts (supplementary material Fig. S6) where SEPT2/7/9 could not be detected (data not shown), indicating that localization of MAP4 at cilia does not depend on septins. We next investigated the role of MAP4 in the localization of septins at the axoneme.
The localization of septins at cilia was analyzed in RPE1 cells treated with siMAP4(1), in conditions in which most of the cells (>90%) showed effective knockdown of MAP4 expression (i.e. similarly to conditions shown in Fig. 8). The proportion of cilia (AcTub) that stained for SEPT7 was quantified and compared to control siLUC-treated cells. As shown in Fig. 9A, SEPT7 colocalized with AcTub in long cilia present in MAP4-depleted cells in a proportion similar to that for control cells (84.0 versus 71.6%, respectively). These data indicate that MAP4 is not required for the recruitment of septins to the axoneme of cilia.
Overexpression of MAP4 results in the mislocalization of septins from stable cytoplasmic microtubules (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008). To test whether a similar competition could occur at the axoneme, which is also composed of stabilized microtubules, the distribution of septins at cilia was analyzed in ciliated cells expressing GFP–MAP4m (see Fig. 7) or SSTR3–GFP as a control. As expected, SEPT7 (Fig. 9B), as well as SEPT2 and SEPT9 (data not shown), did not colocalize with AcTub in most GFP–MAP4m-positive cilia (Fig. 9B, arrows). In contrast, septins were present in all SSTR3–GFP-positive control long cilia. These results support a general role of MAP4 as a negative regulator of septin functions at stabilized microtubules.
Discussion
The above results show that a SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 complex is present along the axoneme of the primary cilium of RPE cells where it appears to function as a positive regulator of ciliogenesis. We identified MAP4 along the axoneme of the primary cilium where it appears to function as a negative regulator of ciliary length. Therefore, MAP4 and septins appear to function antagonistically to control ciliogenesis and the length of the primary cilium.
Our proteomic analysis revealed a complex of SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 in a ∼1∶1∶1 stoichiometry in RPE1 cells, and all three of these septin isoforms had overlapping distributions in the cytoplasm of RPE1 cells, and prominently at the axoneme of the primary cilium of quiescent RPE1 cells (Figs 1, 3, 4). Similar overlapping distributions of SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 were observed in ARPE19 cells, another RPE cell line (supplementary material Fig. S1). A previous study showed that SEPT2 localized to the base the primary cilium of quiescent IMCD3 kidney cells (Hu et al., 2010), but that it also formed puncta along the axoneme in a minority of these cells (Hu et al., 2010). Interestingly, a recent proteomic study revealed that SEPT2, SEPT7 and SEPT9 are present in IMCD3 cilia (Ishikawa et al., 2012).
Several other proteomic studies showed the presence of septins in the multiple primary cilia of choroid plexus epithelial cells (swine), in mouse photoreceptor connecting cilia and cilia of olfactory neurons from rat (Narita et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2007; Mayer et al., 2009). Finally our results show that septins are present within the axoneme of cilia in human tissues including connecting cilia of photoreceptors, primary cilia of kidney epithelial cells and motile cilia of the lung (Fig. 2). Taken together, these results demonstrate that septins are general components of cilia in vertebrates, but have distinct distributions, and possibly functions, in different tissues and cell types.
SEPT2, SEPT7 and SEPT9 were found at the axoneme of human RPE cells but not in human primary fibroblasts (data not shown). The molecular basis for different distributions of the same septins in the primary cilium of different cell types is unclear. However, it is interesting to note that SEPT7 and SEPT9 colocalized with AcTub in the primary cilium of the two RPE cell lines but were absent from cytoplasmic microtubules in RPE1 cells (Fig. 4; supplementary material Fig. S1); in contrast, SEPT7 and SEPT9 colocalized with AcTub microtubules in the cytoplasm, mitotic spindle and mid-body of ARPE19 cells (supplementary material Fig. S1B,C,E). These results indicate that the mechanisms controlling localization of septin to cytoplasmic microtubules and the axoneme are probably different, and that further studies are required to understand the underlying mechanisms.
We used FRAP and live-cell imaging to investigate whether SEPT2 and SEPT9 moved dynamically in the primary cilium. Our results showed that there was no exchange between the axonemal and cytoplasmic pools of septins nor movement of septins along the axoneme, indicating that septins are not a component of IFT (Fig. 5; supplementary material Fig. S5). These data indicate differences in the dynamic properties of cytoplasmic and ciliary septins. They also support previous observations indicating that, with the exception of IFT components and signaling molecules, the ciliary membrane and axonemal compartments have low or very limited exchange with the rest of the cell. Finally, FRAP was also used to investigated the dynamics of the SSTR3–GFP, a well-characterized ciliary membrane protein, in cilia of RPE1 cells. Our results indicate that SSTR3–GFP dynamics are similar in the cilia of RPE-1 and IMCD3 cells (Hu et al., 2010; Chih et al., 2012), with low if any recovery after photobleaching of the whole cilium (supplementary material Fig. S9A,A′). In addition, SSTR3–GFP can also diffuse within the ciliary membrane (supplementary material Fig. S9B,B′). Thus the presence of septins along the axoneme does not appear to prevent the movement of membrane proteins in the ciliary membrane.
To investigate the functions of septins in RPE1 cilia, we depleted septins using a siRNA-based approach. As previously described (Kremer et al., 2005; Tooley et al., 2009; Sellin et al., 2011), efficient knockdown of SEPT7 resulted in the concomitant loss of the other two members of the complex, SEPT2 and SEPT9. Under these conditions, ciliogenesis was inhibited in ∼50% of cells, and the primary cilia in the remaining ∼50% of cells were significantly shorter than in the control. SiRNA-targeted depletion of SEPT9 affected SEPT9 levels but not those of SEPT2 or SEPT7 (see also Tooley et al., 2009; Estey et al., 2010; Sellin et al., 2011), and resulted in little or no effect on ciliogenesis, although the primary cilia were shorter. These results indicate that the SEPT2/SEPT7/SEPT9 complex is required for ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells, as shown previously for SEPT2 in IMCD3 cells (Hu et al., 2010; Chih et al., 2012), and that SEPT9 is specifically required for the proper elongation of cilia. The importance of SEPT9 is in agreement with recent data showing that SEPT9 plays a crucial role in the elongation of septin filaments because of its terminal position within septins oligomers (Kim et al., 2011). In conclusion, the assembly of septin filaments plays a crucial role in the elongation of the primary cilium in RPE1 cells.
To further investigate the role of septins in the primary cilium, we examined MAP4, which regulates the functions of septins with cytoplasmic microtubules (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008). MAP4 colocalized with AcTub along the axoneme of the primary cilium in RPE1 cells (Fig. 7), and in human primary fibroblasts (supplementary material Fig. S6). MAP4 is a well-established positive regulator of microtubule polymerization, and MAP4 depletion results in an increase in the pool of free tubulin, whereas overexpression of wild-type or mutant forms of MAP4 containing the microtubule-binding domain (including MAP4m) stabilizes microtubules and increases the proportion of polymerized tubulin (Nguyen et al., 1997; Nguyen et al., 1999; Holmfeldt et al., 2002; Holmfeldt et al., 2007). Interestingly, moderate treatment with nocodazole, which depolymerizes microtubules and increases the amount of free tubulin, results in longer cilia (Sharma et al., 2011), similar to what we observed when we depleted MAP4 in RPE1 cells (Fig. 8). As expected, treatment of MAP4-depleted RPE1 cells with moderate concentration of taxol, which stabilizes microtubules and decrease ciliary length (Sharma et al., 2011), reversed the effect of MAP4 depletion and resulted in shorter MAP4-depleted cilia (supplementary material Fig. S10). Part of the effect of MAP4 depletion on ciliary length could be interpreted as an indirect effect on the assembly of cytoplasmic microtubules and regulation of free tubulin pool. However, the presence of MAP4 within cilia (Fig. 7; supplementary material Fig. S6) indicates that MAP4 may also directly regulate the polymerization dynamics of axonemal microtubules.
Our results show that MAP4 is not required for the localization of septins to the cilium of RPE1 cells (Fig. 9A). Significantly, MAP4 was present in primary cilia in which the levels of SEPT2/7/9 were very low, such as human primary fibroblasts (supplementary material Fig. S6, and data not shown), indicating that MAP4 might compete with and/or displace septins from axonemal microtubules. Indeed, studies in vitro and in vivo have shown that MAP4 and septins compete for microtubule binding (Kremer et al., 2005; Spiliotis et al., 2008). Therefore, we speculate that in the primary cilium, MAP4 controls the accessibility of septins to the axoneme thereby negatively regulating ciliary elongation, an effect counteracted by septins in cell types such as RPE cells. In agreement with this hypothesis, septins were absent from cilia in cells expressing the MAP4m mutant (Fig. 9B).
The molecular basis for a cell-type-specific effect of MAP4 on the accessibility of septins to the axoneme remains to be determined. Regulation of MAP4 functions through alternative splicing (Chapin et al., 1995) and/or phosphorylation by MARK [MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (Drewes et al., 1997)] are two possibilities that should be investigated in the future. Interestingly, recent data obtained by G. Pereira's group (Kuhns et al., 2013) indicate that MARK4, a kinase known to phosphorylate MAP4 (Trinczek et al., 2004), is present at the basal body where it positively regulates ciliogenesis in a kinase-activity-dependent process.
In conclusion, our study reveals that septins and MAP4 probably play antagonistic roles in controlling axonemal microtubule organization and growth, similar to their functions with cytoplasmic microtubules. In addition, septins have different distributions within the primary cilium of different cell types indicating different functions and mechanisms of regulation.
Materials and Methods
Plasmids, antibodies and reagents
The Septin9_v1–tomato-encoding plasmid was described previously (Mostowy et al., 2010). The SSTR3–GFP-encoding plasmid was a generous gift from K. Mykytyn [Ohio State University (Berbari et al., 2008)]. The MAP4m–GFP-encoding plasmid was provided by F. Perez [Curie Institute (Perez et al., 1999)]. Mouse SEPT2 was subcloned from SEPT2-YFP to generate SEPT2–S-tag–GFP containing a TEV site between the S-tag and GFP, using Gateway subcloning (Invitrogen); RFP-pericentrin PACT domain (PeriCTRFP) was a gift from Sean Munro (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK) (for details, see Hu et al., 2010). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against acetylated tubulin (clone 6-11B-1) and γ-tubulin (GTU-88) were from Sigma. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against MAP4 (sc-67152) and goat polyclonal against NPHP1 (sc-20204) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against SEPT2, SEPT7 and SEPT9 were described previously (Mostowy et al., 2009; Mostowy et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2010), or obtained from Sigma (SEPT7; HPA 029524). Monoclonal antibodies against mouse centrin3 were previously characterized and are frequently used as molecular markers of ciliary sub-compartments (Trojan et al., 2008). Alexa-Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 546 and Alexa Fluor 647) and Alexa-Fluor-546-conjugated phalloidin were purchased from Life Technologies (Molecular Probes). Cytochalasin D, blebbistatin, Forchlorfenuron, taxol and nocodazole were purchased from Sigma.
Cells
RPE1 cells, a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line that stably expresses human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT-RPE1; Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), and ARPE19 cells, a spontaneously arising human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, were kind gifts from M. Bornens (Institut Curie, Paris, France) and Y. Courtois (Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France). Human inner foreskin fibroblasts (hFF) were a kind gift from Y. Ganor (Institut Cochin, Paris). RPE cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)-F12 (1∶1) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies) for RPE1 cells, and in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life technologies) for hFF. To induce ciliogenesis, cells were grown to confluency on glass coverslips in basic cell culture conditions and then transferred into low serum (0.5% FBS) medium for an additional 24 or 48 hours, as described previously (Molla-Herman et al., 2010).
Transfections
Transfections of plasmids were performed following the recommended procedure for the FuGENE HD (Roche) transfection reagent. Subconfluent RPE1 cells grown on glass coverslips or on μ-slides (Ibidi) were transfected and immediately transferred to low serum conditions for 24 or 48 hours.
For knockdown experiments, RPE1 cells were treated with control siRNA [luciferase (Luc): 5′-GCCATTCTATCCTCTAGAGGATG-3′] or with siRNA targeting SEPT7 [SEPT7(1): 5′-GTCGACATTAATCAACTCA-3′; SEPT7(2): 5′-GGCAGTATCCTTGGGGTGT-3′ (Kremer et al., 2005)], SEPT9 [SEPT9: ID no. 18228 from Ambion (Mostowy et al., 2009; Mostowy et al., 2010)] or MAP4 [MAP4(1): 5′-CTGGCCAGAAGATACCAAC-3′; MAP4(2): 5′-GATAGTCCCAGCCAAGGAT-3′; (Holmfeldt et al., 2007)]. The siRNA duplexes, with the exception of SEPT9, were obtained from Eurogentec. Briefly, siRNA duplexes were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Life technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions as described previously (Molla-Herman et al., 2010). RPE1 cells plated at 30% confluency (cells per well) were transfected on the first day with siRNA (50 nM) and then grown in basic conditions. Transfected cells were transferred to low serum media (0 or 0.5% serum) to induce ciliogenesis on the third or fourth day, as indicated, and then processed for immunofluorescence or biochemistry.
Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on glass coverslips were washed twice in PBS and fixed in methanol at −20°C for 4 minutes, or in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at 4°C. Fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml BSA (Sigma) for 45 minutes at room temperature. After two washes with PBS–BSA, cells were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in PBS–BSA containing secondary antibodies. After one wash with PBS–BSA and two washes in PBS, coverslips were mounted on microscope slides in a PBS–glycerol mix (50/50) using the SlowFade Light Antifade Kit containing DAPI from Molecular Probes (S36938, Life Technologies). Samples were examined with an epi-illumination microscope (DMI 6000, Leica) with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (MicroMax, Princeton Instruments). Images were acquired with MetaMorph (Molecular Devices) and processed with MetaMorph and Photoshop CS2 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Mature human kidney and 33-week-old fetal lung were embedded in OCT compound. Frozen sections, 8 µm-thick, were fixed in acetone for 10 minutes, treated with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, 3% BSA and 10% donkey serum for 1 hour and incubated in the same buffer overnight at 4°C with appropriate antibodies. Hoechst (no. 33342, Sigma) was used to label the nuclei and slides were mounted with FLUOPREP (BioMerieux sa, Marcy L'Etoile, France). Light microscopy analyses of immunofluorescence samples were performed with an Epi-illumination microscope (DMI 6000, Leica Microsystems).
Eyes of a human adult donor [69-year-old female donor (hum252), 11.5 hours post-mortem] were cryofixed in melting isopentane and cryosectioned as described elsewhere (Wolfrum, 1992). Cryosections were placed on coverslips precoated with poly-L-lysine, and incubated with in PBS containing 0.01% Tween 20 for 20 minutes. After a PBS washing step, sections were covered with blocking solution (PBS containing 0.5% cold-water fish gelatin, 0.1% ovalbumin) and incubated for a minimum of 30 minutes followed by an overnight incubation with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution at 4°C. Washed cryosections were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen) in PBS with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1.5 hours at room temperature in the dark. After repeated washing with PBS, sections were mounted in Mowiol 4.88 (Hoechst). Light microscopy analyses of immunofluorescence samples were performed with a Leica DM6000 microscope (Leica microsystems).
Human eyes were obtained from the Dept. of Ophthalmology (Mainz, Germany) and kidney and lung samples from the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital (Paris, France). Guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed.
Live-cell imaging and FRAP
Dynamics of SSTR3, SEPT2 and SEPT9 in the primary cilium were analyzed by live-cell fluorescence microscopy. RPE1 cells grown on µ-slides (Ibidi) were transfected with SSTR3-GFP- and/or SEPT9-tomato- or SEPT2-GFP and pericentrin-RFP-encoding plasmids in low serum media and analyzed 24 or 48 hours later. Live-cell fluorescence microscopy was performed using an Apo 100× NA 1.43 microscope objective and an inverted epi-illumination microscope (Axiovert 100 M, Zeiss) placed within a temperature-controlled enclosure set at 37°C. Images corresponding to GFP and tomato fluorescence were acquired successively every 3 seconds for 3–20 minutes. Shutters, filters, camera and acquisition were controlled by MetaMorph. The final movies and images were generated using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/index.html) and Photoshop. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies were performed with a laser scanning confocal microscope (TCS SP2 AOBS, Leica) after excitation with a 488-nm laser line from an argon laser, as described previously (Molla-Herman et al., 2010). Briefly, regions containing the primary cilium or another area of the same cells were exposed to two consecutive laser pulses of 1 second with 100% of the laser intensity, and recovery of fluorescence was analyzed for the indicated periods. Images were then analyzed using ImageJ to quantify normalized fluorescence in the selected zones. The fluorescence intensity at the photo-bleached regions was measured using ImageJ and the percentage of recovery was calculated as follows. In the first case, the whole cilium was photobleached and in the second case, only one half of the cilium was photobleached. The final images were generated using ImageJ and Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc.).
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
RPE cells were grown in the presence or absence of serum, extracted in buffer containing 10 mM Hepes–NaOH, pH 7.4, 140 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM Pefabloc, and 0.5% Triton X-100, and centrifuged at 20,000 g. SEPT2–S-tag–GFP was immunoprecipitated from the resulting supernatant with a GFP antibody and protein-A–Sepharose 4B beads. The resulting immunoprecipitated proteins were treated with TEV protease, and processed for a second round of isolation with S-beads (Millipore). Following elution from the S-beads, proteins co-isolated with SEPT2 were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and silver staining. Proteins were transferred onto Immobilon P membranes (Millipore), and incubated overnight at 4°C in blocking buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% Tween 20, 2% BSA). SEPT9_v1, SEPT7 and SEPT2 antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated with the membrane for 2 hours. Blots were subsequently incubated with secondary Alexa-Fluor-680- and IRDye800-conjugated antibodies and scanned in a Li-COR infrared imager.
For immunoblotting, cells were lysed in lysis buffer [0.02 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1% NP40, 0.1 M (NH4)2SO4, 10% glycerol, 10 mM protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)] for 30 minutes at 4°C. After centrifugation, cleared lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride transfer membranes (PVDF, GE Healthcare) using the NuPage electrophoresis system (Life technologies). Immunoblotting was performed using the indicated primary antibodies and revealed using the ECL+ Detection Kit (GE Healthcare).
Statistical analysis
The percentage of ciliated cells and the length of primary cilium were quantified and measured using fluorescence microscope images and ImageJ. To determine the percentage of ciliated cells, we counted the number of nuclei (DAPI staining) in each image and the number of primary cilia detected by the AcTub staining. The percentage of ciliated cells was equal to (number of cilia/number of nuclei)×100. Cilia were measured with the analyze-measure option of ImageJ. All the results were then transferred to Excel. Student's t-tests and Fischer's tests were used for the percentage of ciliated cells and cilium length, respectively.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all their generous collaborators for providing important reagents; Anthony Henneveu for his help with immunofluorescence and transfections; Flora Legendre for her help with immunohistochemistry; people from the ‘Imagerie Cellulaire’ facility of the Cochin Institute for their help; G. Pereira for sharing important new results; and A. Touré and N. Spassky for stimulating discussions.
Footnotes
Author contributions
R.G., Q.H., M.F., M.C.R. and B.S. performed and analyzed the experiments; S.M., U.W., S.S. and P.C. provided reagents, tissues samples, expertise and designed and analyzed some of the experiments; R.G., Q.H., W.J.N. and A.B. designed most of the experiments; W.J.N. and A.B. analyzed all the experiments; R.G., W.J.N. and A.B. wrote the manuscript; all the coauthors corrected the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number GM35527 to W.J.N.]; a Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Predoctoral Fellowship [grant number BC083077 to Q.H.]; Agence National de la Recherche [grant number R09087KS to A.B. and S.S.]; the Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur [R.G.]; Région ile de France, Cardiovasculaire Obésité-Rein-Diabète les domaines d’intérêt majeur (CORDDIM) [M.F.]; a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship [grant number WT097411MA to S.M.]; a European Research Council Advanced Grant Award [grant number 233348 to S.M.]; and ‘SYSCILIA’ European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2009 [grant agreement number 241955 to U.W.]. Deposited in PMC for release after 6 months.
Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.111377/-/DC1
References
- Berbari N. F., Johnson A. D., Lewis J. S., Askwith C. C., Mykytyn K. (2008). Identification of ciliary localization sequences within the third intracellular loop of G protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 1540–1547 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bershteyn M., Atwood S. X., Woo W-M., Li M., Oro A. E. (2010). MIM and cortactin antagonism regulates ciliogenesis and hedgehog signaling. Dev. Cell 19, 270–283 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapin S. J., Lue C. M., Yu M. T., Bulinski J. C. (1995). Differential expression of alternatively spliced forms of MAP4: a repertoire of structurally different microtubule-binding domains. Biochemistry 34, 2289–2301 10.1021/bi00007a025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chih B., Liu P., Chinn Y., Chalouni C., Komuves L. G., Hass P. E., Sandoval W., Peterson A. S. (2012). A ciliopathy complex at the transition zone protects the cilia as a privileged membrane domain. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 61–72 10.1038/ncb2410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drewes G., Ebneth A., Preuss U., Mandelkow E. M., Mandelkow E. (1997). MARK, a novel family of protein kinases that phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins and trigger microtubule disruption. Cell 89, 297–308 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80208-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Estey M. P., Di Ciano-Oliveira C., Froese C. D., Bejide M. T., Trimble W. S. (2010). Distinct roles of septins in cytokinesis: SEPT9 mediates midbody abscission. J. Cell Biol. 191, 741–749 10.1083/jcb.201006031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francis S. S., Sfakianos J., Lo B., Mellman I. (2011). A hierarchy of signals regulates entry of membrane proteins into the ciliary membrane domain in epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 193, 219–233 10.1083/jcb.201009001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Gonzalo F. R., Corbit K. C., Sirerol-Piquer M. S., Ramaswami G., Otto E. A., Noriega T. R., Seol A. D., Robinson J. F., Bennett C. L., Josifova D. J. et al. (2011). A transition zone complex regulates mammalian ciliogenesis and ciliary membrane composition. Nat. Genet. 43, 776–784 10.1038/ng.891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilula N. B., Satir P. (1972). The ciliary necklace. A ciliary membrane specialization. J. Cell Biol. 53, 494–509 10.1083/jcb.53.2.494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Händel M., Schulz S., Stanarius A., Schreff M., Erdtmann-Vourliotis M., Schmidt H., Wolf G., Höllt V. (1999). Selective targeting of somatostatin receptor 3 to neuronal cilia. Neuroscience 89, 909–926 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00354-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hildebrandt F., Benzing T., Katsanis N. (2011). Ciliopathies. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1533–1543 10.1056/NEJMra1010172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmfeldt P., Brattsand G., Gullberg M. (2002). MAP4 counteracts microtubule catastrophe promotion but not tubulin-sequestering activity in intact cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 1034–1039 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00897-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmfeldt P., Stenmark S., Gullberg M. (2007). Interphase-specific phosphorylation-mediated regulation of tubulin dimer partitioning in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1909–1917 10.1091/mbc.E07-01-0019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmfeldt P., Sellin M. E., Gullberg M. (2009). Predominant regulators of tubulin monomer-polymer partitioning and their implication for cell polarization. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 3263–3276 10.1007/s00018-009-0084-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu S. C., Hazuka C. D., Roth R., Foletti D. L., Heuser J., Scheller R. H. (1998). Subunit composition, protein interactions, and structures of the mammalian brain sec6/8 complex and septin filaments. Neuron 20, 1111–1122 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80493-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Q., Nelson W. J. (2011). Ciliary diffusion barrier: the gatekeeper for the primary cilium compartment. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 68, 313–324 10.1002/cm.20514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Q., Nelson W. J., Spiliotis E. T. (2008). Forchlorfenuron alters mammalian septin assembly, organization, and dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 29563–29571 10.1074/jbc.M804962200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Q., Milenkovic L., Jin H., Scott M. P., Nachury M. V., Spiliotis E. T., Nelson W. J. (2010). A septin diffusion barrier at the base of the primary cilium maintains ciliary membrane protein distribution. Science 329, 436–439 10.1126/science.1191054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ihara M., Kinoshita A., Yamada S., Tanaka H., Tanigaki A., Kitano A., Goto M., Okubo K., Nishiyama H., Ogawa O. et al. (2005). Cortical organization by the septin cytoskeleton is essential for structural and mechanical integrity of mammalian spermatozoa. Dev. Cell 8, 343–352 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishikawa H., Marshall W. F. (2011). Ciliogenesis: building the cell's antenna. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 222–234 10.1038/nrm3085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishikawa H., Thompson J., Yates J. R., 3rd, Marshall W. F. (2012). Proteomic analysis of mammalian primary cilia. Curr. Biol. 22, 414–419 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joo E., Surka M. C., Trimble W. S. (2007). Mammalian SEPT2 is required for scaffolding nonmuscle myosin II and its kinases. Dev. Cell 13, 677–690 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J., Lee J. E., Heynen-Genel S., Suyama E., Ono K., Lee K., Ideker T., Aza-Blanc P., Gleeson J. G. (2010a). Functional genomic screen for modulators of ciliogenesis and cilium length. Nature 464, 1048–1051 10.1038/nature08895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim S. K., Shindo A., Park T. J., Oh E. C., Ghosh S., Gray R. S., Lewis R. A., Johnson C. A., Attie-Bittach T., Katsanis N. et al. (2010b). Planar cell polarity acts through septins to control collective cell movement and ciliogenesis. Science 329, 1337–1340 10.1126/science.1191184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M. S., Froese C. D., Estey M. P., Trimble W. S. (2011). SEPT9 occupies the terminal positions in septin octamers and mediates polymerization-dependent functions in abscission. J. Cell Biol. 195, 815–826 10.1083/jcb.201106131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita M., Field C. M., Coughlin M. L., Straight A. F., Mitchison T. J. (2002). Self- and actin-templated assembly of Mammalian septins. Dev. Cell 3, 791–802 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00366-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kissel H., Georgescu M-M., Larisch S., Manova K., Hunnicutt G. R., Steller H. (2005). The Sept4 septin locus is required for sperm terminal differentiation in mice. Dev. Cell 8, 353–364 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kremer B. E., Haystead T., Macara I. G. (2005). Mammalian septins regulate microtubule stability through interaction with the microtubule-binding protein MAP4. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4648–4659 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuhns S., Schmidt K. N., Reymann J., Gilbert D. F., Neuner A., Hub B., Carvalho R., Wiedemann P., Zentgraf H., Erfle H. et al. (2013). The microtubule affinity regulating kinase MARK4 promotes axoneme extension during early ciliogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 200, 505–522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Q., Tan G., Levenkova N., Li T., Pugh E. N., Jr, Rux J. J., Speicher D. W., Pierce E. A. (2007). The proteome of the mouse photoreceptor sensory cilium complex. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1299–1317 10.1074/mcp.M700054-MCP200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer U., Küller A., Daiber P. C., Neudorf I., Warnken U., Schnölzer M., Frings S., Möhrlen F. (2009). The proteome of rat olfactory sensory cilia. Proteomics 9, 322–334 10.1002/pmic.200800149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molla-Herman A., Ghossoub R., Blisnick T., Meunier A., Serres C., Silbermann F., Emmerson C., Romeo K., Bourdoncle P., Schmitt A. et al. (2010). The ciliary pocket: an endocytic membrane domain at the base of primary and motile cilia. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1785–1795 10.1242/jcs.059519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mostowy S., Cossart P. (2012). Septins: the fourth component of the cytoskeleton. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 183–194 10.1038/nrm3284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mostowy S., Nam Tham T., Danckaert A., Guadagnini S., Boisson-Dupuis S., Pizarro-Cerdá J., Cossart P. (2009). Septins regulate bacterial entry into host cells. PLoS ONE 4, e4196 10.1371/journal.pone.0004196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mostowy S., Bonazzi M., Hamon M. A., Tham T. N., Mallet A., Lelek M., Gouin E., Demangel C., Brosch R., Zimmer C. et al. (2010). Entrapment of intracytosolic bacteria by septin cage-like structures. Cell Host Microbe 8, 433–444 10.1016/j.chom.2010.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narita K., Kozuka-Hata H., Nonami Y., Ao-Kondo H., Suzuki T., Nakamura H., Yamakawa K., Oyama M., Inoue T., Takeda S. (2012). Proteomic analysis of multiple primary cilia reveals a novel mode of ciliary development in mammals. Biol. Open 1, 815–825 10.1242/bio.20121081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen H. L., Chari S., Gruber D., Lue C. M., Chapin S. J., Bulinski J. C. (1997). Overexpression of full- or partial-length MAP4 stabilizes microtubules and alters cell growth. J. Cell Sci. 110, 281–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen H. L., Gruber D., Bulinski J. C. (1999). Microtubule-associated protein 4 (MAP4) regulates assembly, protomer-polymer partitioning and synthesis of tubulin in cultured cells. J. Cell Sci. 112, 1813–1824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oegema K., Savoian M. S., Mitchison T. J., Field C. M. (2000). Functional analysis of a human homologue of the Drosophila actin binding protein anillin suggests a role in cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 150, 539–552 10.1083/jcb.150.3.539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen L. B., Rosenbaum J. L. (2008). Intraflagellar transport (IFT) role in ciliary assembly, resorption and signalling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 85, 23–61 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00802-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez F., Diamantopoulos G. S., Stalder R., Kreis T. E. (1999). CLIP-170 highlights growing microtubule ends in vivo. Cell 96, 517–527 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80656-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitaval A., Tseng Q., Bornens M., Théry M. (2010). Cell shape and contractility regulate ciliogenesis in cell cycle-arrested cells. J. Cell Biol. 191, 303–312 10.1083/jcb.201004003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saarikangas J., Barral Y. (2011). The emerging functions of septins in metazoans. EMBO Rep. 12, 1118–1126 10.1038/embor.2011.193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellin M. E., Sandblad L., Stenmark S., Gullberg M. (2011). Deciphering the rules governing assembly order of mammalian septin complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3152–3164 10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma N., Kosan Z. A., Stallworth J. E., Berbari N. F., Yoder B. K. (2011). Soluble levels of cytosolic tubulin regulate ciliary length control. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 806–816 10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiliotis E. T. (2010). Regulation of microtubule organization and functions by septin GTPases. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 67, 339–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiliotis E. T., Hunt S. J., Hu Q., Kinoshita M., Nelson W. J. (2008). Epithelial polarity requires septin coupling of vesicle transport to polyglutamylated microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 180, 295–303 10.1083/jcb.200710039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas J., Morlé L., Soulavie F., Laurençon A., Sagnol S., Durand B. (2010). Transcriptional control of genes involved in ciliogenesis: a first step in making cilia. Biol. Cell 102, 499–513 10.1042/BC20100035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tooley A. J., Gilden J., Jacobelli J., Beemiller P., Trimble W. S., Kinoshita M., Krummel M. F. (2009). Amoeboid T lymphocytes require the septin cytoskeleton for cortical integrity and persistent motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 17–26 10.1038/ncb1808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trinczek B., Brajenovic M., Ebneth A., Drewes G. (2004). MARK4 is a novel microtubule-associated proteins/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase that binds to the cellular microtubule network and to centrosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 5915–5923 10.1074/jbc.M304528200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trojan P., Krauss N., Choe H-W., Giessl A., Pulvermüller A., Wolfrum U. (2008). Centrins in retinal photoreceptor cells: regulators in the connecting cilium. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 27, 237–259 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfrum U. (1992). Cytoskeletal elements in arthropod sensilla and mammalian photoreceptors. Biol. Cell 76, 373–381 10.1016/0248-4900(92)90441-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.