Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1984 Apr;4(4):681–687. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.681

Cell surface interactions in conjugation: Tetrahymena ciliary membrane vesicles.

B Love, M B Rotheim
PMCID: PMC368781  PMID: 6325890

Abstract

Tetrahymena ciliary membrane vesicles are shown to interact with preconjugant cells in a mating type-specific way. When cells are treated with vesicles of a different mating type before mixing for conjugation, cell pairing is enhanced, and the normal prepairing period is partially eliminated. This enhancement is mating type specific since it is not observed after pretreatment of cells with vesicles of their own mating type. In contrast, when vesicles are added at the time of mixing of two starved cultures, cell pairing is delayed in a concentration-dependent manner. By varying the conditions, we demonstrated enhancement or inhibition, or both. These results are interpreted in terms of two independent interactions of cells with vesicles. We suggest that first, vesicles substitute for another cell in cell-cell prepairing interaction and second, vesicles compete for adhesion sites produced during the prepairing period. Finally, the data presented are summarized within a speculative framework that calls attention to potential analogies with hormone-receptor signaling in mammalian cells.

Full text

PDF
681

Images in this article

683Image
on p.683
684Image
on p.684

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adoutte A., Ramanathan R., Lewis R. M., Dute R. R., Ling K. Y., Kung C., Nelson D. L. Biochemical studies of the excitable membrane of Paramecium tetraurelia. III. Proteins of cilia and ciliary membranes. J Cell Biol. 1980 Mar;84(3):717–738. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.3.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruns P. J., Brussard T. B. Pair formation in tetrahymena pyriformis, an inducible developmental system. J Exp Zool. 1974 Jun;188(3):337–344. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401880309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cabral F., Gottesman M. M. The determination of similarities in amino acid composition among proteins separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1978 Dec;91(2):548–556. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90542-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dickinson J. R., Graves M. G., Swoboda B. E. Cyclic AMP metabolism in the cell cycle of Tetrahymena pyriformis. FEBS Lett. 1976 Jun 1;65(2):152–154. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80468-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dickinson J. R., Graves M. G., Swoboda B. E. Induction of division synchrony in Tetrahymena pyriformis by a single hypoxic shock. Its use in elucidating control of the cell cycle by adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Aug 15;78(1):83–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ELLIOTT A. M., TREMOR J. W. The fine structure of the pellicle in the contact area of conjugating Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):839–840. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finley M. J., Bruns P. J. Costimulation in Tetrahymena. II. A nonspecific response to heterotypic cell--cell interactions. Dev Biol. 1980 Sep;79(1):81–94. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Graves M. G., Dickinson J. R., Swoboda B. E. Cyclic GMP and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase in the cell cycle of Tetrahymena pyriformis. FEBS Lett. 1976 Oct 15;69(1):165–166. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80677-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maxfield F. R., Willingham M. C., Davies P. J., Pastan I. Amines inhibit the clustering of alpha2-macroglobulin and EGF on the fibroblast cell surface. Nature. 1979 Feb 22;277(5698):661–663. doi: 10.1038/277661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morrissey J. H. Silver stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels: a modified procedure with enhanced uniform sensitivity. Anal Biochem. 1981 Nov 1;117(2):307–310. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90783-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelsen E. M., Debault L. E. Transformation in Tetrahymena pyriformis: description of an inducible phenotype. J Protozool. 1978 Feb;25(1):113–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1978.tb03880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orias E., Bruns P. J. Induction and isolation of mutants in Tetrahymena. Methods Cell Biol. 1976;13:247–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rotheim M. B., Love B. Role for endocytosis in conjugation in Tetrahymena. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;2(6):633–637. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.6.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Salamone M. F., Pearlman R. E. Sizes of G1 and G2 populations in starved Tetrahymena. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Dec;110(2):323–330. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90298-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams N. E., Subbaiah P. V., Thompson G. A., Jr Studies of membrane formation in Tetrahymena. The identification of membrane proteins and turnover rates in nongrowing cells. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jan 10;255(1):296–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolfe J. G1 arrest and the division/conjugation decision in Tetrahymena. Dev Biol. 1976 Nov;54(1):116–126. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90290-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES