Abstract
A series of 2′-substituted analogues of the selective NMDA receptor ligand (2S,1′R,2′S)-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine ((S)-CCG-IV) have been designed, synthesized and pharmacologically characterized. The design was based on a docking study hypothesizing that substituents in the 2′-position would protrude into a region where differences among the NMDA receptor GluN2 subunits exist. Various synthetic routes were explored, and two different routes provided a series of alkyl-substituted analogues. Pharmacological characterization revealed that these compounds are NMDA receptor agonists and that potency decreases with increasing size of the alkyl groups. Variations in agonist activity are observed at the different recombinant NMDA receptor subtypes. This study demonstrates that it is possible to introduce substituents in the 2′-position of (S)-CCG-IV while maintaining agonist activity and that variation among NMDA receptor subtypes may be achieved by probing this region of the receptor.
Keywords: NMDA receptor, CCG, glutamate, molecular modeling, subtype selectivity, electrophysiology
Introduction
The glutamate receptors (GluRs) are a group of receptors with a prominent role in neurotransmission, since most of the excitatory signals in the brain are mediated by glutamate (Figure 1).1-3 These receptors are involved in key processes of the central nervous system (CNS) such as learning and memory,4 but are also implicated in several neuropathological conditions, such as ischemia, epilepsy, schizophrenia, chronic pain, and Alzheimer’s disease.5 Therefore, the GluRs have been the target of extensive research for more than three decades, and one of the goals has been to develop compounds that can alter glutamatergic neurotransmission in a selective manner. Such compounds have been and continue to be important tools in discovering new therapeutic possibilities and to gain a functional understanding of this group of receptors.6
Figure 1.
Structures of glutamic acid (Glu), (2S,4R)-4-methylglutamate (1b) and N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA, 2), and structures of the NMDA receptor selective ligands 3a and 4a and a series of alkyl substituted analogues.
Two different signaling pathways divide the GluRs: metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate slow modulatory responses, and ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are cation-conducting ion channels that mediate fast neurotransmission via depolarization of the membrane potential. Based on activation by selective ligands and sequence homology, the iGluRs are divided into N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA), (S)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA) and kainic acid (KA) receptors. The iGluRs are homo- or heteromeric assemblies of four subunits. Seven NMDA (GluN1, GluN2A-D, GluN3A-B), four AMPA (GluA1-4) and five KA (GluK1-5) receptor subunits have been identified.3 The majority of native NMDA receptors require assembly of two GluN1 subunits together with two GluN2 subunits. GluN3 subunits can also assemble with GluN1 and GluN2 subunits, but the function and physiological role of these triheteromeric GluN1/GluN2/GluN3 receptors are less well understood. NMDA receptors composed of GluN1 and GluN2 subunits (i.e. GluN1/GluN2) are activated by the simultaneous binding of the endogenous agonists glycine or (R)-serine to GluN1 and glutamate to GluN2. Over the last decade, an increasing number of crystal structures of the agonist binding domains (ABDs) of the iGluRs have appeared (86 available structures to date, covering all the major mammalian GluR groups as well as bacterial homologues) providing detailed structural knowledge of agonist binding and the molecular pharmacology of this group of receptors.2, 7-11 These crystallographic structures have shown that iGluR ABDs are clamshell-like structures, where the agonist binds in the cleft formed by two lobes. Upon agonist binding, the two lobes close around the agonist, whereas binding of antagonists stabilizes an open domain structure.
We have previously reported the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a series of 4-substituted (RS)-2-(N-hydroxypyrazol-5-yl)glycine ((RS)-NHP5G, 3a) analogues as NMDA receptor ligands.12-14 This series demonstrated that introduction of substituents at the 4-position of 3a led to compounds that displayed different efficacies on different GluN2 subtypes. Thus, 4-propyl substituted 3b appears to be a functional antagonist at the GluN1/GluN2A subtype, but a partial agonist at the GluN1/GluN2D subtype. However, the affinities and potencies of the compounds in this series were weak.15 Furthermore, we have previously shown that the highly potent (2S,4R)-4-methyl glutamate (SYM2081, 1b) shows a significant difference in potency at GluN2 subunits.16 In order to improve potency we exploited docking studies in the ABD of the GluN2A receptor subunit, to design, synthesize, and characterize a series of compounds based on the most potent NMDA receptor agonist (2S,1′R,2′S)-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine ((S)-CCG-IV, 4a).16, 17 CCGs are naturally occurring glutamate analogues isolated from seeds of Aesculus parviflora and Blighia sapida, belonging to the family Sapindaceae18 and seeds of Ephedra altissima belonging to the family Ephedraceae.19 These have been important lead structures for the development of a range of selective GluR agonists and antagonists. Three of the stereoisomers are very potent NMDA receptor agonists and may serve as lead structures for obtaining subtype selective NMDA receptor ligands.
While a large number of 2-, 1′- and 3′ substituted CCG analogues have been synthesized, there is no analogues described with substituents in the 2′-position, and therefore synthetic routes are unknown. Herein, we describe our design of the analogues, development of synthetic routes to the first 2′-substituted 4a analogues, as well as the pharmacological characterization at iGluRs.
Results
Design
Initially, the triionized state of 4d was minimized using macromodel and docked using GLIDE. The grid was prepared with GLIDE from the crystal structure of glutamate in the ABD of GluN2A (2A5T:chain B) that had been prepared and minimized following the standard settings in PRIME. This gave a binding mode of 4d shown in Figure 2 overlapping nicely with glutamate in the crystal structure. Comparing with the presumed binding mode of 3b in the same model we saw that substituents in the 2′-position of 4a would overlap with the 4-position of 3a (Figure 2). The substituents in this position is protruding into a region where non-conserved residues are present. We therefore decided to probe the same region based on the 4a scaffold as we have previously done with 3a by synthesizing previously unreported 2′-substituted analogues of 4a.
Figure 2.

A) X-ray crystal structure (PDB:2A5T) of the ABD of GluN2A (blue) containing Glu (1, blue), and 4a (pink) docked in a model of GluN2A ABD created from the crystal structure using the protein preparation module and Glide in the Schrodinger Suite. B) 3b (light blue) and 4d(green) docked in GluN2A ABD demonstrating the overlap of the alkyl groups in the 2′ position of 4a. C) Broader view of GluN2A ABD showing the orientation of 4d in the clamshell-like structure formed by the upper (S1) and lower (S2) lobes of the ABD.
Chemistry
Two distinct routes to the alkyl substituted analogs of 4a were employed starting from commercially available (R)-Garners aldehyde (GA) (Scheme 1 and 2). Initially, Still-Genari reactions between GA and 5a-d were explored (Scheme 1). The α-substituted bis(trifluoroethyl)phosphonoester 5a is commercially available and 5b-d were synthesized as previously described.20, 21 The cis-α,β-unsaturated esters 6a and 6b were obtained in good yields under the Still-Genari conditions but the α-substituted bis(trifluoroethyl)phosphonoesters 5c and 5d resulted in no reaction at −78 °C. Increasing temperature (−78 - 0 °C) resulted in decomposition and isolation of the desired products in very low yields (< 15%). The intermediates 6a and 6b was cyclized into the lactones 7a and 7b using TFA in DCM or p-TsOH in MeOH as previously reported.22, 23
Scheme 1.

Reagents and conditions: a) KHMDS, 5a-d, 18-crown-6, THF, −78 °C, 3 h. (for 6a: 72 %; for 6b: 89 %; for 6c: 16 %; for 6d: 10 %); b) TFA, DCM, rt, 24 h for 7a; c) p-TsOH, MeOH, rt, 24 h for 7b.
Scheme 2.
Reagents and conditions: a) I2, Pyridine, CCl4, 40 °C, 30 min; b) Et2Zn, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, DMF, rt, 1.5 h. (7c: 60 %) ; c) RZnX, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, DMF, rt, 1.5 h. (X = Br or I, for 7d: 46 %; for 7e: 35 %; for 7g: 20 %); d) ZnBr2, Pd[(o-tolyl)3P)]2Cl2, Bu3SnPh or tributyl(vinyl)tin, DMF, 65 °C, 1.5 h. (for 7f: 89 %, for 7h: 56 %); e) DMAP, Boc2O, ACN, rt, 2 h; f) Pd(OAc)2, CH2N2, Et2O, rt, 30 min.
In order to introduce larger alkyl substituents the unsubstituted lactone 7a was attempted α-halogenated. Selective α-iodination was performed using I2 in a mixture of CCl4 and pyridine to afford 8.24
Negishi and Stille cross-couplings on this α-halo-lactone 8 introduced ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, benzyl, vinyl and phenyl substituents (Scheme 2). Increasing bulk of the Negishi reagent resulted in diminished yield in the cross-coupling. The method for preparation of the Negishi reagents was crucial for the yield in the cross-coupling. Transmetallation with ZnBr2 from the corresponding Grignard reagents resulted in very low yields in the coupling compared to oxidative addition of highly reactive Rieke zinc to alkyl halides.25 This was presumed to occur since MgBr2 has been shown to inhibit cross coupling in some instances.26 Compound 7c-e and 7g were prepared by Negishi cross-couplings whereas compound 7f and 7h was prepared by Stille cross-couplings (Scheme 2).
Shimamoto et al. have previously reported cyclopropanation of 7a to obtain the two diastereoisomers in a 6:1 ratio (Scheme 2).27 In an attempt to improve the stereo-selectivity and suppress insertion of diazomethane into the NH bond, additional bulk was introduced on the nitrogen by protection with a second Boc group to afford the imide 9a. Cyclopropanation on this substrate resulted in isolation of 10a as a single diastereoisomer with concomitant increased yield compared to cyclopropanation of 7a. Several attempts were performed to displace the highly toxic and potentially dangerous diazomethane with other cyclopropanation reagents. Among them the Simmon-Smith and Corey Chaykovsky cyclopropanation were attempted, however without success.28, 29 Compound 7b-f were similarly bis-Boc protected and subsequently underwent cyclopropanation to provide 10b-e in low yield (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.

Reagents and conditions: a) DMAP, Boc2O, ACN, rt, 2 h; b) Pd(OAc)2, CH2N2, Et2O, rt, 30 min. (for 10b: 46 %; for 10c: 31 %; for 10d: 15 %); c) Pd2(dba)3, CH2N2, Et2O, rt, 30 min. (for 10d: 37 %; for 10e: 29 %; for 10f: no reaction).
Compound 7h bearing a vinyl substituent decomposed under the protection conditions and was only isolated in 21 % yield. Therefore cyclopropanation was performed directly on 7h to obtain 11 in 40 % yield (Scheme 4). Interestingly only cyclopropanation of the pendant double bond was observed in an excess of diazomethane and none of the endocyclic double bond was cyclopropanated, emphasizing how sensitive the cyclopropanation is to steric bulk in this system. In case of the phenyl substituted compound 9f no reaction was observed in the cyclopropanation. The difficulty of cyclopropanation of highly substituted C-C double bonds or C-C double bonds with cis-unsaturated esters or amides has been noted by others.30, 31 The low yields observed in the cyclopropanation in this small series were not surprising since these compounds both contain a tri-substituted double bond and are α,β-unsaturated lactones. The cyclopropanated products 10b-e were Boc-deprotected prior to hydrolysis to obtain 12b-e in high yields (Scheme 5). Hydrolysis was performed with NaOH in a mixture of water and THF to obtain 13b-e. Subsequent oxidation of the alcohol with KMnO4 in basic solution, deprotection and precipitation gave the desired analogs 4b-e as HCl salts.
Scheme 4.

Reagents and conditions: a) Pd2(dba)3, CH2N2, Et2O, rt, 30 min.
Scheme 5.

Reagents and conditions: a) TFA, DCM, rt, 10 min. (for 12b: 98 %; for 12c: 95 %; for 12d: 95 %; for 12e: 94 %); b) 1M aq NaOH, THF, 40°C, 30 min. (for 13b: 75 %; for 13c: 79 %; for 13d: 67 %; for 13e: 62 %); c) 1M aq NaOH, KMnO4, rt, 4 h. (for 14b: 71 %; for 14c: 83 %; for 14d: 95 %; for 14e: 75 %); d) 2M HCl in Et2O. (for 4b: 71 %; for 4c: 94 %; for 4d: 71 %; for 4e: 82 %).
Pharmacology
The affinities of the compounds at the major iGluR subgroups were investigated using radioligand binding to rat cortical synaptosomes. As shown in Table 1, all the analogues are selective NMDA receptor ligands and the affinity decreases with increasing substituent size. Introducing a methyl group in the 2′-position of 4a decreases the affinity at AMPA receptors by more than an order of magnitude, while the affinity at KA and NMDA receptors are maintained. Extending the alkyl chain length to ethyl and n-propyl an order of magnitude decrease in KA and NMDA receptor affinity is observed for each additional carbon, and AMPA receptor affinity is abolished. The n-butyl substituted analog 4e is not binding to AMPA and KA receptors at a concentration of 100 μM,, but displays weak affinity at NMDA receptors equipotent to the propyl substituted analogue.
Table 1.
Receptor binding affinities of compounds 4a-e at three major groups of iGluRs in rat cortical synaptosome assay. The numbers in brackets [min, max] indicate mean ± SEM according to a logarithmic distribution.44 CGP39653 is a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist and AMPA and KA are agonists at AMPA and KA receptors, respectively. Ki values are calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff relationship. Data for 3a and 3b is from Clausen et al14 ND means not determined and NA means no activity.
| Ki (μM) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compd | R | [3H]AMPA | [3H]KA | [3H]CGP39653 |
| 3a | H | >100 | >100 | 10 |
| 3b | n-Pr | >100 | >100 | 14 |
| 4a | H | 1.1 [1.0;1.3] |
0.31 [0.27;0.36] |
0.0065 [0.0057;0.0074] |
| 4b | Me | 29 [26;32] |
0.11 [0.08;0.14] |
0.0080 [0.0066;0.0098] |
| 4c | Et | > 100 | 0.61 [0.58;0.63] |
0.061 [0.053;0.070] |
| 4d | n-Pr | > 100 | 21 [19;22] |
1.2 [1.1;1.4] |
| 4e | n-Bu | > 100 | > 100 | 1.3 [1.1;1.5] |
The affinity at native NMDA receptors prompted functional characterization at recombinant NMDA receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes to determine the activity at individual receptor subtypes (Table 2, Figures 3 and 4).
Table 2.
Potency and efficacy relative to Glu of compounds 4a-e at recombinant GluN1/GluN2A-D receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Data are from 3-12 oocytes and the numbers in brackets [min, max] indicate mean ± SEM according to a logarithmic distribution.44 The relative maximal currents (relative Imax) are the maximal responses to the indicated agonists obtained by fitting the full concentration-response data normalized to the maximal response activated by glutamate in the same recording (See Experimental). Data for 3a and 3b is from Clausen et al14 and for 4a from Erreger et al.16 ND means not determined and NA means no activity.
| Compound | R | Subtype | EC50 (μM) | Rel. Imax | nHill |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | H | GluN1/GluN2A | 82 | 0.45 | 1.3 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 48 | 0.58 | 1.6 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 54 | 0.52 | 1.4 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 3b | n-Pr | GluN1/GluN2A | NA | NA | NA |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 105 | 0.06 | 1.9 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 429 | 0.22 | 1.1 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 153 | 0.37 | 1.6 | ||
| 4a | H | GluN1/GluN2A | 0.262 | 0.99 | 1.1 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 0.083 | 1.23 | 1.1 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 0.110 | 0.90 | 1.1 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 0.036 | 1.11 | 1.3 | ||
| 4b | Me | GluN1/GluN2A | 0.277[0.261;0.292] | 0.94±0.01 | 1.2 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 0.045[0.043;0.047] | 1.14±0.02 | 1.7 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 0.124[0.120;0.129] | 0.81±0.04 | 1.3 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 0.026[0.025;0.026] | 0.83±0.02 | 1.9 | ||
| 4c | Et | GluN1/GluN2A | 1.18[0.673;1.40] | 0.83±0.03 | 1.3 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 0.272[0.257;0.286] | 1.02±0.04 | 1.5 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 0.540[0.519;0.559] | 0.81±0.02 | 1.5 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 0.080[0.077;0.083] | 0.91±0.01 | 1.6 | ||
| 4d | n-Pr | GluN1/GluN2A | 46.3[45.2;47.4] | 0.67±0.01 | 1.1 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 15.8[15.2;16.3] | 1.05±0.02 | 1.3 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 29.9[29.3;30.5] | 0. 70±0.02 | 1.4 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 6.56 [6.15;6.90] | 0. 89±0.01 | 1.6 | ||
| 4e | n-Bu | GluN1/GluN2A | 28.8[28.4;29.2] | 0.65±0.02 | 1.4 |
| GluN1/GluN2B | 10.2[9.82;10.5] | 1.07±0.01 | 1.6 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2C | 16.0[15.6;16.5] | 0.85±0.02 | 1.5 | ||
| GluN1/GluN2D | 3.30 [3.21;3.39] | 0.94±0.01 | 1.7 |
Figure 3.
Mean concentration–response curves for compounds Me-, Et-, nPr- and nBu-CCG (4b-e) determined using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings on Xenopus oocytes co-expressing GluN1 and GluN2A-D. The curves are normalized to the maximal current response (Imax) to the agonist obtained by fitting the full concentration-response data to the Hill equation (See Experimental). Data points are represented as mean ± SEM from 3-6 oocytes. All EC50-values are listed in Table 2.
Figure 4.

A) Comparison of maximal currents induced by 4a-e relative to Glu at NR1/NR2A-D subtypes. The relative efficacies are the maximal current responses to the indicated agonists obtained by fitting the full concentration-response data normalized to the maximal response activated by glutamate in the same recording (See Experimental). B) Comparison of agonist potencies (pLogEC50) for 4a-e. Values are listed in Table 2. Data for (S)-CCG-IV (4a) are from Erreger et al., 2007.16
The potencies of compounds 4b-e are decreasing at all four subtypes with increasing substituent size as seen in the synaptosomal binding assay (Figure 3 and Table 2). When looking at the development in relative agonist efficacies of compounds 4b-e differences among the subtypes can be observed. Thus, agonist efficacy relative to Glu increases from 83 % to 94 % at GluN2D when going from the methyl substituted 4b to the n-butyl substituted 4e whereas the relative efficacy at GluN2A decreases from 94 % to 65 % (Figure 4).
Discussion
We have designed and synthesized a series of 2′-alkyl substituted analogues of the highly potent NMDA receptor agonist 4a in order to obtain NMDA receptor agonists that display differences among the cloned GluN2 subtypes. The design of this series was based on previous observations with a series of 4-alkyl substituted analogues of the moderately potent NMDA receptor agonist 3a that discriminated subtypes in terms of agonist efficacy and that 1b discriminate subtypes based on potency.14-16 Thus, we wanted to explore the possibility of achieving more potent compounds with the ability to discriminate the different subtypes either by potency or efficacy by adding substituents to 4a that would protrude into the same area as the 4-alkyl groups in 3a and 1b. Two different synthetic routes were developed to yield this series of alkyl substituted analogues of 4a.
Pharmacological characterization of the new analogues revealed that although some potency is lost when introducing larger alkyl groups in the 2′-postion, the analogues are indeed more potent than the corresponding 4-substituted 3a and previously published glutamate analogues.15, 16 The increased potency of 2′-substitued 4a compared to the corresponding 4-substituted 3a may be due to a better orientation and thereby receptor interaction of the distal acid group of the 4a analogues. The variation in agonist efficacy of the new analogues of 4a at the different subtypes is less pronounced than seen with the series of 3a analogues. For example, 4-Et-NHP5G activates GluN2A and GluN2D with 5% and 70 % relative to Glu, respectively, whereas ethyl-substituted 4c activates 83% and 91%, respectively. Nevertheless, propyl substituted 4d activates GluN2A and GluN2B with 67 % and 105 %, respectively, thus significant differences are achievable. Furthermore, differences in potency is also observed, in example compound 4c is 15-fold more potent at GluN2D compared to GluN2A. While 1b is slightly more selective compared to 4c, 1b is also a highly potent agonist at kainate receptors and is less potent at GluN2D32, and thus 4c is one of the most potent and selective agonists towards the GluN2D. This study shows that it is possible to introduce substituents in the 2′ position of (S)-CCG-IV, and we believe that more variation and introduction of more polar substituents will lead to larger differences among subtypes, however other synthetic routes needs to be explored in order to facilitate the synthesis of such compounds.
Experimental
Chemistry
General Methods. All reactions involving dry solvents or air sensitive reagents were performed under an argon atmosphere and glassware was flame-dried prior to use under vacuum. Flash chromatography (FC) was performed using silica Merck 60A (35-70 μm). TLC was carried out using Merck silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheets. The compounds were detected as single spots on TLC plates and visualised using UV light (254 nm) and different spraying reagents such as potassium permanganate, anisaldehyde and ninhydrin. All solvents and reagents were analytical grade purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification. Dry THF and DMF were obtained from a solvent purification system (SPS). 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR were recorded on a Bruker instrument using TMS as internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in parts per million (ppm), and coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz (Hz). The following abbreviations are used: bs = broad singlet, s = singlet, d = doublet, dd = doublet of doublet, ddd = doublet of doublet of doublet, dddd = doublet of doublet of doublet of doublet, t = triplet, dt = doublet of triplet, dddt = doublet of doublet of doublet of triplet, tt = triplet of triplet, q = quartet, dq = doublet of quartet, m = multiplet. LC/MS(A) and LC/MS(B) were performed with an Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer instrument using electron spray coupled to an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (ESI-LC/MS) with a C18 reverse phase column (Zorbax Eclipse XBD-C18, 4.6 mm × 50 mm), autosampler and diode array detector using a linear gradient of the binary solvent system of H2O/ACN/formic acid (A: 95/5/0.1, and B: 5/95/0.086) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. During ESI-LC/MS analysis, evaporative light scattering (ELS) traces were obtained with a Sedere Sedex 85 Light Scattering Detector. LC/MS(A): linear gradient 0 - 90 % B over 4 min, then 0.5 min 100 % B. LC/MS(B): linear gradient 0 - 90 % B over 3 min, then 1.5 min 100 % B. Products were more than 95% pure according to LC/MS.
General procedure for alkylation methyl bis(2,2,2 trifluoroethyl)phosphonoacetate
Methyl 2 (bis(2,2,2 trifluoroethoxy)phosphoryl)propanoate (5b)
To a solution of t-BuOK (1.27 g, 11.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in THF (13 mL) was slowly added methyl bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)phosphonoacetate (2.0 mL, 3.0 g, 9.46 mmol, 1 equiv.) at 0 °C under argon. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min, and methyl iodide (2.96 mL, 47.3 mmol, 5 equiv.) was slowly added at 0 °C. The solution was allowed to warm up to room temperature, stirred for 24 h and treated with a saturated aq solution of NH4Cl (20 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. Purification by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 30 % EtOAc in heptane) afforded 5b (2.30 g, 73 %) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3) δ: 4.49-4.38 (m, 4H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.20 (dq, J = 22.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 1.52 (dd, J = 19.3, 7.4 Hz, 3H). NMR identical to literature.33
Methyl 2-(bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phosphoryl)butanoate (5c)
5c (2.69 g, 52 %) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 4.53-4.34 (m, 4H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.06 (m, 1H), 2.08-1.90 (m, 2H), 1.04 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). NMR identical to literature.34
Methyl 2-(bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phosphoryl)pentanoate (5d)
5d (1.73 g, 32 %). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 4.50-4.35 (m, 4H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.14 (ddd, J = 21.8, 10.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 2.09-1.78 (m, 2H), 1.53-1.27 (m, 2H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
General procedure for Still-Genari reaction
(S,Z)-tert-Butyl 4-(3-methoxy-3-oxoprop-1-en-1-yl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (6a)
18-Crown-6 (44 g, 123.3 mmol, 8.5 equiv.) and 5a (8.1 g, 25.5 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) were dissolved in dry THF (240 mL) and cooled to −78 °C under an atmosphere of argon. 0.5 M KHMDS (47.1 mL, 23.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) was added dropwise and the solution was aged for 1 h. Garners aldehyde (4.5 g, 19.6 mmol, 1 equiv.) in dry THF (13 mL) was slowly added dropwise. The solution was stirred for 3 h at −78 °C. The reaction was quenched with saturated aq NH4Cl (100 mL). The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 150 mL) and the combined organic phases, were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 6a (4.0 g, 72 %) as colorless oil. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.36, 6.27 (dd, J = 10.7, 9.2 Hz, 1H, rotamers), 5.85 (m, 1H), 5.41 (bs, 1H), 4.33-4.25 (m, 1H), 3.79 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 1.66-1.41 (m, 15H, rotamers). NMR identical to literature.35
(S,Z)-tert-Butyl 4-(3-methoxy-2-methyl-3-oxoprop-1-en-1-yl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (6b)
6b (2.5 g, 89 %). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.10-5.95 (m, 1H), 5.14-5.12 (bs, 1H), 4.22 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.73 (m, 4H), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.64-1.38 (m, 15H). NMR identical to literature.23
(S,Z)-tert-Butyl 4-(2-(methoxycarbonyl)but-1-en-1-yl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (6c)
6c (247 mg, 15.7 %) as a pale yellow oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 5.94 (m, 1H), 5.03 (m, 1H), 4.20 (m, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.42-2.21 (m, 2H), 1.48 (m, 15H), 1.05 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
Methyl 2-(bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phosphoryl)pentanoate (6d)
6d (100 mg, 10.6 %) as a pale yellow oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 5.94-5.91 (m, 1H), 5.06-5.00 (m, 1H), 4.22-4.17 (m, 1H), 3.72 (m, 4H), 2.37-2.15 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.37 (m, 17H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
(S)-tert-Butyl (6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7a)
To a solution of 6a (5.1 g, 17.9 mmol) in DCM (100 mL), was added TFA (2.87 mL, 38.6 mmol, 2.1 equiv.) and the solution was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 60 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 7a (2.5 g, 65 %) as a white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.88 (bs, 1H), 6.10 (dd, J = 9.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (bs, 1H), 4.50-4.36 (m, 3H), 1.45 (s, 9H). NMR identical to literature.27
(S)-tert Butyl (5-methyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7b)
6b (2.36 g, 7.9 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in MeOH (43 mL). p-TsOH (75 mg, 0.40 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) was added and the solution stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20-50 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 7b (1.1 g, 61 %) as white solid. ((460 mg, 1.54 mmol) starting material, and (100 mg, 0.41 mmol) of the aminal opened intermediate recovered). (76 % yield based on recovered starting materiel). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.59 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.48-4.34 (m, 3H), 1.96 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 9H). NMR identical to literature.23
(S)-tert-butyl (5-iodo-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (8)
7a (1.4 g, 6.6 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in CCl4 (10 ml) and pyridine (10 ml). A solution of iodine (8.38 g, 33 mmol, 5.0 equiv.) dissolved in pyridine and CCl4 (1:1, 45 mL) was added at room temperature. The solution was heated at 40 °C for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by addition of 1M aq Na2S2O3 (50 mL) and stirred for 10 min. The phases were separated and the water phase extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 50 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 8 (1.8 g, 80 %) as off-white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 7.62 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (dd, J = 10.7, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (m, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 159.83 (s, 1C), 156.06 (s, 1C), 154.71 (s, 1C), 90.24 (s, 1C), 79.89 (s, 1C), 70.73 (s, 1C), 46.58 (s, 1C), 27.57 (s, 3C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.42, ELSD: 100 %, UV254nm 100 %, (M-Boc)H+ 240.0.
General procedure for Negishi cross-coupling
(S)-tert-Butyl (5-ethyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7c)
A solution of 8 (310 mg, 0.91 mmol, 1 equiv.) and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (63.8 mg, 0.091 mmol, 0.1 equiv.) in dry degassed DMF (3.8 mL) was added Et2Zn (0.59 mL, 0.59 mmol, 1M in hexanes, 0.65 equiv.) at room temperature and stirred for 1.5 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aq NH4Cl (10 mL). Et2O (25 mL) was added and the phases separated. The water phase was extracted with Et2O (2 × 25 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 5 % Acetone in DCM) to afford 7c (130 mg, 60 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 6.62 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.45-4.38 (m, 2H), 4.23 (m, 1H), 2.33 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (s, 9H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 166.05 (s, 1C), 157.36 (s, 1C), 139.54 (s, 1C), 135.94 (s, 1C), 80.69 (s, 1C), 71.16 (s, 1C), 44.88 (s, 1C), 28.69 (s, 3C), 24.86 (s, 1C), 12.71 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.43, ELSD: 0 %, UV254nm 100 %, (M-Boc)H+ 142.1.
(S)-tert-Butyl (6-oxo-5-propyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7d)
7d (415 mg, 46 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 6.63 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.45-4.38 (m, 2H), 4.20 (dd, J = 10.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.34-2.21 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.45 (m, 11H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; MeOD): δ 166.28 (s, 1C), 157.61 (s, 1C), 140.98 (s, 1C), 134.54 (s, 1C), 80.80 (s, 1C), 71.23 (s, 1C), 44.97 (s, 1C), 33.84 (s, 1C), 28.65 (s, 3C), 22.35 (s, 1C), 13.95 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.74, ELSD: 0 %, UV 100 %, (M-Boc)H+ 156.1.
Preparation of ~ 0.7 M propylzinc(II) iodide
A dry flask was charged with a highly reactive Rieke Zn suspension in THF (12.1 mL, 0.76 M, 9.2 mmol) under an atmosphere of argon and covered with alumina foil. A solution of n-propyl iodide (0.90 mL, 1.56 g, 9.2 mmol) was added at rt, and the mixture was stirred for 24 h.
(S)-tert-Butyl (5-butyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7e)
7e (273 mg, 35 %) as a off white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.61 (dd, J = 4.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.43-4.36 (m, 2H), 4.22-4.18 (m, 1H), 2.33-2.22 (m, 2H), 1.50-1.31 (m, 13H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CDCl3): δ 166.29 (s, 1C), 157.63 (s, 1C), 140.79 (s, 1C), 134.78 (s, 1C), 80.80 (s, 1C), 71.23 (s, 1C), 44.98 (s, 1C), 31.50 (s, 1C), 31.38 (s, 1C), 28.66 (s, 3C), 23.30 (s, 1C), 14.17 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.05, ELSD: 0 %, UV 100 %, (M-Boc)H+ 170.1.
Preparation of ~ 0.7 M butylzinc(II) iodide
A dry flask was charged with a highly reactive Rieke Zn suspension in THF (9.92 mL, 0.76 M, 7.54 mmol) under an atmosphere of argon and covered with alumina foil. A solution of butyl iodide (0.85 mL, 1.39 g, 7.54 mmol) was added slowly at rt, and the mixture was stirred for 24 h.
(S)-tert-Butyl (5-benzyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7g)
7g (90 mg, 20 %) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 7.36-7.19 (m, 5H), 6.48-6.46 (m, 1H), 4.39-4.35 (m, 2H), 4.21-4.16 (m, 1H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 166.03 (s, 1C), 157.58 (s, 1C), 142.04 (s, 1C), 139.44 (s, 1C), 134.53 (s, 1C), 130.26 (s, 2C), 129.60 (s, 2C), 127.63 (s, 1C), 79.87 (s, 1C), 71.23 (s, 1C), 45.06 (s, 1C), 37.69 (s, 1C), 28.72 (s, 3C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.99, ELSD: 0 %, UV 95.6 %, MH+ 204.1.
Preparation of ~ 0.5 M benzylzinc(II) bromide
A dry flask was charged with a highly reactive Rieke Zn suspension (4.96 mL, 0.76 M, 3.77 mmol). This suspension was cooled to 0 °C. A solution of benzyl bromide (0.45 mL, 0.65 g, 3.77 mmol) in THF (2.13 mL) was added dropwise, and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 3 h.
General procedure for Stille cross-coupling
(S)-tert-Butyl (6-oxo-5-phenyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7f)
A flask charged with ZnBr2 (36 mg, 0.16 mmol, 0.16 equiv.) was flame dried and put under argon atmosphere. The flask was charged with Pd[(o-tolyl)3P)]2Cl2 (40 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.05 equiv.), 8 (339 mg, 1.0 mmol, 1 equiv.) and DMF (2 mL) was added. Tributylphenyltin (0.35 mL, 400 mg, 1.1 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) was added slowly at room temperature and the solution stirred at 65 °C for 1.5 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of saturated aq NH4Cl (10 mL) and Et2O (20 mL) was added. The phases were separated and the organic phase washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was dissolved in ACN (30 mL) and washed with heptane (4 × 20 mL). The ACN phase was evaporated to dryness and the crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 30 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 7f (258 mg, 89 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 7.47-7.45 (m, 2H), 7.35 (m, 3H), 6.95 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.54-4.52 (m, 2H), 4.34-4.30 (m, 1H), 1.47 (s, 9H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 165.15 (s, 1C), 157.60 (s, 1C), 143.06 (s, 1C), 136.51 (s, 1C), 134.54 (s, 1C), 129.57 (s, 2C), 129.48 (s, 1C), 129.12 (s, 2C), 80.91 (s, 1C), 71.08 (s, 1C), 45.33 (s, 1C), 28.67 (s, 3C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.84, ELSD: 100 %, UV 100 %, (M-Boc)H+ 190.1.
(S)-tert-Butyl (6-oxo-5-vinyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (7h)
7h (1.17 g, 56 %) as off-white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.83 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 6.53-6.46 (m, 1H), 5.87 (dd, J = 17.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (dd, J = 11.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (dd, J = 7.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (dd, J = 11.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (dd, J = 11.4, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.47 (s, 9H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CDCl3): δ 162.62 (s, 1C), 154.83 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1C), 137.19 (s, 1C), 131.03 (s, 1C), 130.27 (s, 1C), 119.34 (s, 1C), 80.66 (s, 1C), 70.03 (s, 1C), 43.48 (s, 1C), 28.27 (s, 3C). LC/MS(A): RT 2.87, ELSD: 0 %, UV254nm 100 %, MNa+ 262.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9a)
To a solution of 7a (260 mg, 1.22 mmol, 1 equiv.) in ACN (5.6 mL), (Boc)2O (799 mg, 3.66 mmol, 3 equiv.) and DMAP (29 mg, 0.24 mmol, 0.2 equiv.) was added successively. The solution was stirred for 2 h at room temperature, the solvent evaporated off and the crude product purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 9a (375 mg, 98 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 7.02 (ddd, J = 10.1, 2.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (dd, J = 10.1, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (dddd, J = 9.9, 6.1, 2.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (dd, J = 10.4, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (ddd, J = 10.6, 6.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (s, 18H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; MeOD): δ 165.07 (s, 1C), 153.49 (s, 2C), 150.45 (s, 1C), 119.74 (s, 1C), 85.39 (s, 2C), 69.12 (s, 1C), 50.93 (s, 1C), 28.40 (s, 6C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.03, ELSD: 0 %, UV 100 %, MNa+ 336.1
tert-Butyl N-[(tert butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(1S,5S,6R)-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl]carbamate (10a)
Pd(OAc)2 (27 mg, 0.12 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) was suspended in a solution of 9a (0.750 g, 2.4 mmol, 1 equiv.) in Et2O (50 mL). A solution of CH2N2 (approx. 5.0 equiv.) in Et2O was added dropwise over approximately 15 min. The solution was stirred for another 15 min and quenched by addition of glacial acetic acid (0.69 mL, 721 mg, 12 mmol) and the solvent was evaporated off. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 10a (628 mg, 80 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.40 (ddd, J = 13.3, 1.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J = 13.3, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.03 (dddd, J = 9.4, 7.4, 4.9, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 1.91-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.53 (s, 18H), 1.32-1.23 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CDCl3): δ 169.78 (s, 1C), 152.74 (s, 2C), 83.26 (s, 2C), 68.06 (s, 1C), 47.20 (s, 1C), 27.83 (s, 6C), 17.64 (s, 1C), 16.53 (s, 1C), 8.65 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.91, ELSD: 0 %, UV210nm 0 %, (2M)Na+ 677.4.
General procedure for Boc-protection
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-5-methyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9b)
A solution of 7b (1.1 g, 4.8 mmol, 1 equiv.) in ACN (22 mL) was added (Boc)2O (3.14 g, 14.4 mmol, 3 equiv.) and DMAP (117 mg, 0.96 mmol, 0.2 equiv.) successively. The solution was stirred for 2 h at room temperature, the solvent evaporated off and the crude product purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 9b (1.54 g, 98 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.53 (dq, J = 2.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.27-5.18 (m, 1H), 5.27-5.18 (m, 1H), 4.57 (td, J = 10.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (ddt, J = 10.2, 6.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 1.95 (dt, J = 2.4, 1.3 Hz, 3H), 1.51 (s, 18H). 13C-NMR (151 MHz; CDCl3): δ 164.39 (s, 1C), 151.95 (s, 2C), 142.00 (s, 1C), 126.42 (s, 1C), 83.98 (s, 2C), 67.80 (s, 1C), 49.80 (s, 1C), 28.08 (s, 6C), 17.38 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.28, ELSD: 0 %, UV 100 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 128.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-5-ethyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9c)
9c (587 mg, 100 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 6.65 (s, 1H), 5.24-5.19 (m, 1H), 4.54 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (dd, J = 10.6, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.53 (s, 18H), 1.13 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). LC/MS(A): RT 4.51, ELSD: 100 %, UV 100 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 142.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-6-oxo-5-propyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9d)
9d (500 mg, 100 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 6.62 (m, 1H), 5.18 (dddt, J = 9.1, 5.9, 3.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (dd, J = 10.7, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (ddd, J = 10.7, 5.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.32-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.46 (m, 20H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 166.19 (s, 1C), 153.69 (s, 2C), 142.61 (s, 1C), 132.43 (s, 1C), 85.06 (s, 2C), 69.31 (s, 1C), 51.02 (s, 1C), 34.04 (s, 1C), 28.39 (s, 6C), 22.62 (s, 1C), 14.17 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.78, ELSD: 0 %, UV 93 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 156.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-5-butyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9e)
9e (340 mg, 100 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 6.62 (m, 1H), 5.17 (dddt, J = 9.1, 5.9, 3.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (dd, J = 10.7, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (ddd, J = 10.7, 5.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.35-2.22 (m, 2H), 1.50-1.34 (m, 22H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 165.97 (s, 1C), 153.47 (s, 2C), 142.20 (s, 1C), 132.44 (s, 1C), 84.83 (s, 2C), 69.10 (s, 1C), 50.80 (s, 1C), 31.44 (s, 1C), 31.41 (s, 1C), 28.19 (s, 6C), 23.23 (s, 1C), 14.18 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.95, ELSD: 0 %, UV 100 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 170.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(3S)-6-oxo-5-phenyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl]carbamate (9f)
9f (300 mg, 88 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.47-7.45 (m, 2H), 7.37-7.29 (m, 3H), 6.89 (dd, J = 2.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (ddd, J = 10.7, 6.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (dd, J = 10.7, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (ddd, J = 10.1, 6.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (s, 18H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CDCl3): δ 162.69 (s, 1C), 151.90 (s, 2C), 144.06 (s, 1C), 135.07 (s, 1C), 130.23 (s, 1C), 128.39 (s, 1C), 128.35 (s, 2C), 128.26 (s, 2C), 84.03 (s, 2C), 67.40 (s, 1C), 50.22 (s, 1C), 28.00 (s, 6C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.73, ELSD: 100 %, UV 89 %, MH+ 190.0.
General procedure for cyclopropanation (Method A)
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(1S,5S,6R)-1-methyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl]carbamate (10b)
Pd(OAc)2 (11.2 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) was suspended in a solution of 9b (330 mg, 1 mmol, 1 equiv.) in Et2O (20 mL). A solution of CH2N2 (approx. 5 equiv.) in Et2O was added dropwise over approximately 15 min. The solution was stirred for another 15 min and quenched by addition of glacial acetic acid (0.29 mL, 300 mg, 5 mmol) and the solvent was evaporated off. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 0-50 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 10b (157 mg, 46 %, 72 % based on recovered starting material). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CDCl3): δ 4.71 (m, 1H), 4.31-4.29 (m, 2H), 1.51 (s, 19H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.34 (dd, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.03 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.2 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (151 MHz; CDCl3): δ 172.52 (s, 1C), 152.85 (s, 2C), 83.11 (s, 2C), 69.09 (s, 1C), 48.34 (s, 1C), 27.92 (s, 6C), 24.79 (s, 1C), 21.41 (s, 1C), 20.87 (s, 1C), 15.27 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.26, ELSD: 0 %, UV 0 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 142.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(1S,5S,6R)-1-ethyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl]carbamate (10c)
10c (70 mg, 31 %, 57 % based on recovered starting material). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.45 (dd, J = 13.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (ddd, J = 13.4, 1.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 1.80 (dq, J = 14.3, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.64 (m, 1H), 1.46-1.36 (m, 20H), 1.10 (dd, J = 8.4, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 174.99 (s, 1C), 154.02 (s, 2C), 84.05 (s, 2C), 69.94 (s, 1C), 50.04 (s, 1C), 28.72 (s, 1C), 28.25 (s, 6C), 27.45 (s, 1C), 26.00 (s, 1C), 14.10 (s, 1C), 11.65 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.55, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 156.1.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(1S,5S,6R)-2-oxo-1-propyl-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl]carbamate (10d)
10d (105 mg, 15 %, 48 % based on recovered starting material) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 4.68 (m, 1H), 4.46 (dd, J = 13.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (ddd, J = 13.3, 2.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 1.72-1.35 (m, 24H), 1.12 (dd, J = 8.4, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; MeOD): δ 175.22 (s, 1C), 154.26 (s, 2C), 84.20 (s, 2C), 69.93 (s, 1C), 50.20 (s, 1C), 38.14 (s, 1C), 28.22 (s, 6C), 26.51 (s, 1C), 26.19 (s, 1C), 21.22 (s, 1C), 14.74 (s, 1C), 14.58 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.69, ELSD: 0 %, UV210nm 100 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 170.1.
General procedure for cyclopropanation (Method B)
Pd2(dba)3 (52 mg, 0.057 mmol, 0.05 equiv.) was suspended in a solution of 9d (400 mg, 1.13 mmol, 1 equiv.) in Et2O (22 mL). A solution of CH2N2 (approx. 5 equiv.) in Et2O was added dropwise over approximately 15 min. The solution was stirred for another 15 min and quenched by addition of glacial acetic acid (0.32 mL, 339 mg, 5.65 mmol) and the solvent was evaporated off. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 20 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 10d (155 mg, 37 %, 63 % based on recovered starting material) as white solid. NMR and LC/MS identical to Method A.
tert-Butyl N-[(tert-butoxy)carbonyl]-N-[(1S,5S,6R)-1-butyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl]carbamate (10e)
10e (72 mg, 29 %, 48 % based on recovered starting material). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.46 (dd, J = 13.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (ddd, J = 13.3, 2.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 1.69-1.63 (m, 2H), 1.59-1.26 (m, 24H), 1.11 (dd, J = 8.5, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; MeOD): δ 175.24 (s, 1C), 154.25 (s, 2C), 84.20 (s, 2C), 69.91 (s, 1C), 50.23 (s, 1C), 35.65 (s, 1C), 30.20 (s, 1C), 28.24 (s, 6C), 26.53 (s, 1C), 26.18 (s, 1C), 23.96 (s, 1C), 14.82 (s, 1C), 14.39 (s, 1C). LC/MS(B): RT 4.19, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-2Boc)H+ 184.1.
(S)-tert-butyl (5-cyclopropyl-6-oxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)carbamate (11)
11 (440 mg, 41 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.27 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (bs, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.30-4.26 (m, 1H), 1.84-1.77 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 0.85 (m, 1H), 0.84-0.82 (m, 1H), 0.59-0.55 (m, 1H), 0.52-0.48 (m, 1H).
General procedure for deprotection of a single Boc-group
tert-Butyl ((1S,5S,6R)-1-methyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl)carbamate (12b)
10b (300 mg, 0.88 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in DCM (5.85 mL) and TFA (67 μL, 0.88 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added. The solution was stirred for 10 min and the solvent was evaporated off. The compound was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 40-70 % EtOAc in heptane) to afford 12b (207 mg, 95 %) as a white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.29-4.15 (m, 2H), 4.06 (s, 1H), 1.69-1.59 (m, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.07 (dd, J = 7.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H). LC/MS(A): RT 3.04, ELSD: 0 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 142.1.
tert-Butyl ((1S,5S,6R)-1-ethyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl)carbamate (12c)
12c (170 mg, 95 %) of the desired product as a white foam. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.32 (dd, J = 12.6, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (ddd, J = 12.6, 1.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (bs, 1H), 1.85-1.69 (m, 2H), 1.60 (dd, J = 5.8, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.51-1.32 (m, 10H), 1.14 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 174.74 (s, 1C), 157.60 (s, 1C), 80.43 (s, 1C), 69.83 (s, 1C), 45.01 (s, 1C), 28.85 (s, 1C), 28.75 (s, 3C), 27.36 (s, 1C), 27.01 (s, 1C), 15.66 (s, 1C), 11.92 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.87, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 156.0.
tert-Butyl ((1S,5S,6R)-2-oxo-1-propyl-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl)carbamate (12d)
12d (130 mg, 95 %) as white foam. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.29 (dd, J = 12.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (ddd, J = 12.6, 1.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (ddd, J = 2.7, 2.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 1.82-1.71 (m, 2H), 1.58 (dd, J = 5.8, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.53-1.41 (m, 11H), 1.31 (ddd, J = 13.2, 9.5, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 1.12 (dd, J = 8.2, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 174.78 (s, 1C), 157.61 (s, 1C), 80.44 (s, 1C), 69.82 (s, 1C), 45.04 (s, 1C), 38.14 (s, 1C), 28.76 (s, 3C), 27.54 (s, 1C), 25.98 (s, 1C), 21.60 (s, 1C), 16.07 (s, 1C), 14.55 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.03, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 170.1.
tert-Butyl ((1S,5S,6R)-1-butyl-2-oxo-3-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-5-yl)carbamate (12e)
12e (90 mg, 94 %) as white foam. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.30 (dd, J = 12.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (ddd, J = 12.6, 1.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (bs, 1H), 1.81 (m, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H), 1.58 (dd, J = 5.8, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.47-1.26 (m, 14H), 1.12 (dd, J = 8.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 174.79 (s, 1C), 157.69 (s, 1C), 80.44 (s, 1C), 69.81 (s, 1C), 45.05 (s, 1C), 35.69 (s, 1C), 30.65 (s, 1C), 28.79 (s, 3C), 27.54 (s, 1C), 26.05 (s, 1C), 23.83 (s, 1C), 16.19 (s, 1C), 14.50 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.04, ELSD: 98.4 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 184.1.
General procedure for hydrolysis
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2-hydroxyethyl)-1-methylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (13b)
To a solution 12b (207 mg, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv.) in THF (1.6 mL) was added 1M aq NaOH (1.54 mL, 1.54 mmol, 1.8 equiv.) at room temperature and stirred at 40 °C for 30 min. EtOAc (50 mL) was added then 1M KHSO4 (10 mL). The phases were separated and the water phase extracted with additional EtOAc (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 1% AcOH in EtOAc) to afford 13b (167 mg, 75 %) as a white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 3.70 (ddd, J = 10.2, 5.8, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.51 (dd, J = 11.1, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (dd, J = 11.1, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.44-1.37 (m, 10H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.24-1.15 (m, 1H), 0.86 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.1 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 177.68 (s, 1C), 158.06 (s, 1C), 79.95 (s, 1C), 65.33 (s, 1C), 53.25 (s, 1C), 32.10 (s, 1C), 28.88 (s, 3C), 25.04 (s, 1C), 21.69 (s, 1C), 20.87 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 2.64, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 160.2.
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2-hydroxyethyl)-1-ethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (13c)
13c (145 mg, 79 %) as white foam. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 3.67 (ddd, J = 10.1, 6.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (dd, J = 11.0, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (dd, J = 11.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.86 (dq, J = 14.0, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.47 (s, 9H), 1.38 (dd, J = 5.9, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 1.32-1.19 (m, 2H), 1.02 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.1 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.91 (s, 1C), 157.90 (s, 1C), 79.81 (s, 1C), 65.16 (s, 1C), 53.24 (s, 1C), 31.56 (s, 1C), 30.79 (s, 1C), 29.92 (s, 1C), 28.80 (s, 3C), 19.22 (s, 1C), 12.08 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 2.91, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 174.1
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2-hydroxyethyl)-1-propylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (13d)
13d (92 mg, 67 %). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 3.61 (ddd, J = 10.0, 6.1, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (dd, J = 11.0, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (dd, J = 11.0, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (ddd, J = 13.5, 9.5, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.53-1.35 (m, 12H), 1.28-1.10 (m, 2H), 0.91-0.83 (m, 4H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.82 (s, 1C), 157.88 (s, 1C), 79.80 (s, 1C), 65.14 (s, 1C), 53.34 (s, 1C), 39.24 (s, 1C), 30.73 (s, 1C), 30.48 (s, 1C), 28.81 (s, 3C), 21.77 (s, 1C), 19.36 (s, 1C), 14.62 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.22, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 188.1.
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-1-((tert-Butoxycarbonyl)amino)-2-hydroxyethyl)-1-butylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (13e)
13e (52 mg, 62 %) as white solid. 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 3.64 (ddd, J = 10.1, 6.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (dd, J = 11.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (dd, J = 11.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.87 (ddd, J = 13.8, 9.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.50-1.17 (m, 16H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.3 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 177.30 (s, 1C), 158.15 (s, 1C), 79.96 (s, 1C), 65.30 (s, 1C), 53.58 (s, 1C), 47.70 (s, 1C), 36.93 (s, 1C), 30.84 (s, 1C), 28.84 (s, 3C), 23.92 (s, 1C), 19.22 (s, 1C), 14.42 (s, 1C), 9.23 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 4.04, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 202.0.
General procedure for oxidation (Method A)
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-amino(carboxy)methyl)-1-methylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid hydrochloride (14b and 4b·HCl)
13b (167 mg, 0.64 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in 1M aq NaOH (3.2 mL) and KMnO4 (458 mg, 2.90 mmol, 4.5 equiv.) was added. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. 2-propanol (4 mL) was added and the solution stirred for 40 min. Mn2O was filtered off and the filter washed with 2-propanol. The solvent was evaporated off and EtOAc (30 mL) and 1M KHSO4 (10 mL) were added. The water phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried twice over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness to afford 14b (123 mg, 71 %) as a white solid. LC/MS(A): RT 2.67, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 174.0. 14b (123 mg, 0.45 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in a minimum amount of dioxane (~ 1 mL). 4M HCl in dioxane (1 mL) was added dropwise. After 1 h the precipitate was centrifuged and the solvent was decanted off. The precipitate that was washed with Et2O (4 mL), the mixture centrifuged and the solvent decanted off. The white solid was dried to afford 4b·HCl (81 mg, 86 % (71 % when corrected from 1,4-dioxane)) as white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.22 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H), 1.50-1.42 (m, 2H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.19-1.12 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.71 (s, 1C), 171.24 (s, 1C), 52.54 (s, 1C), 29.54 (s, 1C), 25.61 (s, 1C), 21.35 (s, 1C), 20.92 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 0.57, ELSD: 0 %, UV 0 %, MH+ 174.0.
General procedure for oxidation (Method B)
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-amino(carboxy)methyl)-1-ethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid hydrochloride (14c and 4c·HCl)
13c (145 mg, 0.53 mmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in 1M NaOH (2.7 mL) and KMnO4 (376 mg, 2.39 mmol, 4.5 equiv.) was added. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. 2-propanol (4 mL) was added and the solution stirred for 40 min. Mn2O was filtered off and the filter washed with 2-propanol. The solvent was evaporated off and EtOAc (30 mL) and 1M KHSO4 (10 mL) were added. The water phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness. The compound was purified by silica gel chromatography (Eluent: 1% CH3COOH in EtOAc) to afford 14c (125 mg, 0.44 mmol, 83 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 4.33 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 1.72 (dq, J = 14.3, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.46-1.33 (m, 12H), 1.03 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (dd, J = 7.9, 3.8 Hz, 1H). LC/MS(A): RT 2.90, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 188.1. 14c (125 mg, 0.44 mmol) was dissolved in a minimum amount of Et2O (0.3 mL). 2M HCl in Et2O (2 mL) was added dropwise. The solution was stirred for 1 h, the mixture centrifuged and the solvent removed by decantation. The precipitate was washed with Et2O (4 mL), centrifuged and the solvent removed by decantation. The white solid was dried on high vacuum to afford 4c·HCl (91 mg, 94 %). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.21 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.49-1.40 (m, 2H), 1.15 (dd, J = 6.2, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.15 (s, 1C), 171.30 (s, 1C), 52.78 (s, 1C), 31.49 (s, 1C), 29.20 (s, 1C), 28.68 (s, 1C), 20.42 (s, 1C), 11.87 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 0.89, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, MH+ 188.1
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-amino(carboxy)methyl)-1-propylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid hydrochloride (14d and 4d·HCl)
14d (92 mg, 0.31 mmol, 95 %) as a white foam/solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.28 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 1.73-1.22 (m, 15H), 0.92 (m, 4H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.64 (s, 1C), 175.30 (s, 1C), 157.70 (s, 1C), 80.29 (s, 1C), 53.51 (s, 1C), 39.02 (s, 1C), 31.41 (s, 1C), 30.48 (s, 1C), 28.77 (s, 3C), 21.66 (s, 1C), 20.23 (s, 1C), 14.67 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 3.20, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 202.1.
4d·HCl (52 mg, 71 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.18 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 1.67-1.40 (m, 6H), 1.16-1.11 (m, 1H), 0.92 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.19 (s, 1C), 171.26 (s, 1C), 52.77 (s, 1C), 38.50 (s, 1C), 30.49 (s, 1C), 28.73 (s, 1C), 21.59 (s, 1C), 20.53 (s, 1C), 14.53 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 1.51, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, MH+ 202.1.
(1S,2R)-2-((S)-amino(carboxy)methyl)-1-butylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid hydrochloride (14e and 4e·HCl)
14e (40 mg, 0.13 mmol, 75 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD): δ 4.28 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 1.69 (ddd, J = 12.6, 10.6, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 1.52-1.25 (m, 16H), 0.91 (bs, 1H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.90 (s, 1C), 175.53 (s, 1C), 157.9 (s, 1C), 80.36 (s, 1C), 53.59 (s, 1C), 36.52 (s, 1C), 31.43 (s, 1C), 30.66 (s, 1C), 30.55 (s, 1C), 28.73 (s, 3C), 23.93 (s, 1C), 20.17 (s, 1C), 14.37 (s, 1C).
4e·HCl (26 mg, 82 %). 1H-NMR (400 MHz; CD3OD): δ 4.16 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 1.65-1.40 (m, 6H), 1.32 (m, 2H), 1.11 (m, 1H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; CD3OD): δ 176.22 (s, 1C), 171.32 (s, 1C), 52.77 (s, 1C), 36.06 (s, 1C), 30.66 (s, 1C), 30.57 (s, 1C), 28.80 (s, 1C), 23.90 (s, 1C), 20.58 (s, 1C), 14.34 (s, 1C). LC/MS(A): RT 1.73, ELSD: 100 %, UV 0 %, (M-Boc)H+ 216.1.
Molecular Modeling and Ligand—Protein Docking
The Schrödinger 2011 suite was used for modeling and docking studies (Schrödinger, Portland, OR). The crystal structure of the soluble GluN2A-ABD construct in complex with glutamate (PDB code 2A5T)36 was employed in the protein preparation wizard in Maestro (Schrödinger, Portland, OR) with standard parameters for assigning charges and protons and performing a minimization. None of the missing amino acid side chains were modeled. This model was then used to generate Van der Waals and electrostatic grids with the docking module Glide using default parameters (Schrödinger, Portland, OR). These grids were then used for ligand docking.
The CCG analogues 4a-e and (R)-Pr-NHP5G (3b) were submitted to minimization in macromodel (Schrödinger, Portland, OR) in tri-ionized forms using default parameters. The best scoring poses according to G-score were used. Figures were created using Pymol (ver. 0.99, Delano Scientific).
In Vitro Pharmacology
Receptor Binding Assays
Affinities for native AMPA, KA and NMDA receptors in rat cortical synaptosomes were determined using 5 nM [3H]AMPA37 (Kd = 35 nM, 53.4 Ci/mmol), 5 nM [3H]KA (Kd = 5.6 nM, 49.9 Ci/mmol)38 and 2 nM [3H]CGP 39653 (Kd = 6 nM, 40.5 Ci/mmol)39 respectively, with minor modifications as previously described.40 Rat brain membrane preparations used in these receptor binding experiments were prepared according to a method previously described.41
Two-Electrode Voltage-Clamp Electrophysiology
Wild-type cDNAs for rat GluN1 (GluN1-1a; GenBank accession numbers U11418), rat GluN2A (D13211), rat GluN2B (U11419), rat GluN2C (M91563), and rat GluN2D (L31611) were provided by Drs. S. Heinemann (Salk Institute, San Diego, CA), S. Nakanishi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), and P. Seeburg (University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany). For expression in Xenopus oocytes, DNA constructs were linearized by restriction enzymes and used as templates to synthesize cRNAs using the mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion). Xenopus oocytes for injection were prepared as previously described.42 Two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings were performed essentially as previously described.43 During recordings, the oocytes were voltage-clamped at −60 mV to −40 mV and continuously perfused with extracellular solution containing (in mM) 90 NaCl, 0.5, BaCl2, 1 KCl, 0.01 EDTA, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.4). 50 μM glycine was included in the extracellular solution at all times.
Agonist concentration–response data for individual oocytes were fitted to the Hill equation. The logEC50 and nH from the individual oocytes were used to calculate the mean ± SEM. For graphical presentation, datasets from individual oocytes were normalized to the fitted maximal response and the mean ± SEM was calculated for each of the normalized data points. These averaged data points were then fitted to the Hill equation and plotted together with the resulting curve. Relative Imax was calculated from a full concentration-response measurement as Imax, agonist/Imax, glutamate, where Imax, agonist is the fitted value according to the Hill equation and Imax, glutamate is the maximal response evoked by glutamate in the same recording.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH-NIND (NS065371, NS036654 SFT), and the University of Copenhagen Programme of Excellence Glutarget.
Nonstandard abbreviations
- NHP5G
N-hydroxypyrazol-5-ylglycine
- NMDA
N-methyl-d-aspartic acid
- CCG
carboxycyclopropyl)glycine
- GluRs
glutamate receptors
- Glu, CNS
central nervous system
- mGluRs
metabotropic glutamate receptors
- iGluRs
ionotropic glutamate receptors
- AMPA
(S)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid
- KA
kainic acid
- ABD
agonist binding domain
References
- 1.Bräuner-Osborne H, Egebjerg J, Nielsen EO, Madsen U, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Ligands for glutamate receptors: design and therapeutic prospects. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:2609–2645. doi: 10.1021/jm000007r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erreger K, Chen PE, Wyllie DJ, Traynelis SF. Glutamate receptor gating. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 2004;16:187–224. doi: 10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v16.i3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Hansen KB, Yuan H, Myers SJ, Dingledine R. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 2010;62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Riedel G, Platt B, Micheau J. Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory. Behav. Brain Res. 2003;140:1–47. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00272-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Javitt DC. Glutamate as a therapeutic target in psychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 2004;9:984–997. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Parsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G. Glutamate in CNS disorders as a target for drug development: an update. Drug News Perspect. 1998;11:523–569. doi: 10.1358/dnp.1998.11.9.863689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armstrong N, Gouaux E. Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor: Crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core. Neuron. 2000;28:165–181. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00094-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Armstrong N, Sun Y, Chen GQ, Gouaux E. Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate. Nature. 1998;395:913–917. doi: 10.1038/27692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Furukawa H, Gouaux E. Mechanisms of activation, inhibition and specificity: crystal structures of the NMDA receptor NR1 ligand-binding core. EMBO J. 2003;22:2873–2885. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mayer ML. Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 ligand binding cores: molecular mechanisms underlying kainate receptor selectivity. Neuron. 2005;45:539–552. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Naur P, Vestergaard B, Skov LK, Egebjerg J, Gajhede M, Kastrup JS. Crystal structure of the kainate receptor GluR5 ligand-binding core in complex with (S)-glutamate. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:1154–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cali P, Begtrup M. Synthesis of 1-hydroxypyrazole glycine derivatives. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:1595–1605. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clausen RP, Hansen KB, Cali P, Nielsen B, Greenwood JR, Begtrup M, Egebjerg J, Brauner-Osborne H. The respective N-hydroxypyrazole analogues of the classical glutamate receptor ligands ibotenic acid and (RS)-2-amino-2-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)acetic acid. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004;499:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clausen RP, Christensen C, Hansen KB, Greenwood JR, Jorgensen L, Micale N, Madsen JC, Nielsen B, Egebjerg J, Brauner-Osborne H, Traynelis SF, Kristensen JL. N-Hydroxypyrazolyl glycine derivatives as selective N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:4179–4187. doi: 10.1021/jm800025e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Risgaard R, Hansen KB, Clausen RP. Partial agonists and subunit selectivity at NMDA Receptors. Chem.-Eur. J. 2010;16:13910–13918. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Erreger K, Geballe MT, Kristensen A, Chen PE, Hansen KB, Lee CJ, Yuan H, Le P, Lyuboslavsky PN, Micale N, Jorgensen L, Clausen RP, Wyllie DJ, Snyder JP, Traynelis SF. Subunit-specific agonist activity at NR2A-, NR2B-, NR2C-, and NR2D-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007;72:907–920. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.037333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hansen KB, Brauner-Osborne H, Egebjerg J. Pharmacological characterization of ligands at recombinant NMDA receptor subtypes by electrophysiological recordings and intracellular calcium measurements. Comb. Chem. High. T. Scr. 2008;11:304–315. doi: 10.2174/138620708784246040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fowden L, Smith A, Millington DS, Sheppard RC. Cyclopropane amino acids from Aesculus and Blighia. Phytochemistry. 1969;8:437–443. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Starratt AN, Caveney S. 4 Cyclopropane Amino-Acids from Ephedra. Phytochemistry. 1995;40:479–481. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crimmins MT, Slade DJ. Formal synthesis of 6-deoxyerythronolide B. Org. Lett. 2006;8:2191–2194. doi: 10.1021/ol0607241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dias LC, Meira PR. Total synthesis of the potent antitumor polyketide (−)-Callystatin A. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:4762–4773. doi: 10.1021/jo050352u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Drew MGB, Harrison RJ, Mann J, Tench AJ, Young RJ. Photoinduced addition of methanol to 5(S)-5-triisopropylsiloxymethyl-N-boc-dihydropyrrole-2(5H)-one: A new route to 4(S), 5(S)-disubstituted pyrrolidin-2-ones. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:1163–1172. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nevalainen M, Koskinen AMP. The hydrogenation of (4R)-4-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-2-methyl-2-penten-5-olide: A precursor of trans-4-methylproline. Synlett. 2001;2001:0640–0642. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johnson CR, Adams JP, Braun MP, Senanayake CBW, Wovkulich PM, Uskoković MR. Direct α-iodination of cycloalkenones. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:917–918. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu L, Wehmeyer RM, Rieke RD. The direct formation of functionalized alkyl(aryl)zinc halides by oxidative addition of highly reactive zinc with organic halides and their reactions with acid-chlorides, α,β-unsaturated ketones, and allylic, aryl, and vinyl halides. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:1445–1453. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Negishi E, Tan Z, Liou SY, Liao BQ. Strictly regiocontrolled alpha-monosubstitution of cyclic carbonyl compounds with alkynyl and alkyl groups via Pd-catalyzed coupling of cyclic α-iodoenones with organozincs. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:10197–10207. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shimamoto K, Ishida M, Shinozaki H, Ohfune Y. Synthesis of four diastereomeric L-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycines - conformationally constrained L-glutamate analogs. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:4167–4176. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Corey EJ, Chaykovsky M. Dimethylsulfoxonium methylide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962;84:867–868. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morikawa T, Sasaki H, Hanai R, Shibuya A, Taguchi T. Synthesis of optically active cis- and trans-1,2-disubstituted cyclopropane derivatives by the Simmons-Smith reaction of allyl alcohol derivatives derived from (R)-2,3-O-isopropylideneglyceraldehyde. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:97–103. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Concellon JM, Rodriguez-Solla H, Mejica C, Blanco EG. Stereospecific cyclopropanation of highly substituted C-C double bonds promoted by CrCl2. Stereoselective synthesis of cyclopropanecarboxamides and cyclopropyl ketones. Org. Lett. 2007;9:2981–2984. doi: 10.1021/ol070896d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mende U, Radüchel B, Skuballa V, Vorbrüggen H. A new simple conversion of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds into their corresponding cyclopropyl ketones and esters. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975;16:629–632. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Donevan SD, Beg A, Gunther JM, Twyman RE. The methylglutamate, SYM 2081, is a potent and highly selective agonist at kainate receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998;285:539–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lifchits O, Reisinger CM, List B. Catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of alpha-branched enals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:10227–10229. doi: 10.1021/ja1037935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Morimoto Y, Matsuda F, Shirahama H. Synthetic studies on virantmycin. 1. Total synthesis of (±)-virantmycin and determination of its relative stereochemistry. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:10609–10630. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hashimoto M, Hashimoto K, Shirahama H. Acyclic analogs of kainoids: Their syntheses and depolarizing activities. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:1931–1942. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Furukawa H, Singh SK, Mancusso R, Gouaux E. Subunit arrangement and function in NMDA receptors. Nature. 2005;438:185–192. doi: 10.1038/nature04089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Honore T, Nielsen M. Complex structure of quisqualate-sensitive glutamate receptors in rat cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1985;54:27–32. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(85)80113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Braitman DJ, Coyle JT. Inhibition of [3H]kainic acid receptor binding by divalent cations correlates with ion affinity for the calcium channel. Neuropharmacology. 1987;26:1247–1251. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(87)90083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sills MA, Fagg G, Pozza M, Angst C, Brundish DE, Hurt SD, Wilusz EJ, Williams M. [3H]CGP 39653: a new N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist radioligand with low nanomolar affinity in rat brain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1991;192:19–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90063-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hermit MB, Greenwood JR, Nielsen B, Bunch L, Jorgensen CG, Vestergaard HT, Stensbol TB, Sanchez C, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Madsen U, Brauner-Osborne H. Ibotenic acid and thioibotenic acid: a remarkable difference in activity at group III metabotropic glutamate receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004;486:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ransom RW, Stec NL. Cooperative modulation of [3H]MK-801 binding to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-ion channel complex by L-glutamate, glycine, and polyamines. J. Neurochem. 1988;51:830–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb01818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Traynelis SF, Burgess MF, Zheng F, Lyuboslavsky P, Powers JL. Control of voltage-independent zinc inhibition of NMDA receptors by the NR1 subunit. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:6163–6175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-16-06163.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hansen KB, Traynelis SF. Structural and Mechanistic Determinants of a Novel Site for Noncompetitive Inhibition of GluN2D-Containing NMDA Receptors. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:3650–3661. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5565-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Christopoulos A. Assessing the distribution of parameters in models of ligand-receptor interaction: to log or not to log. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1998;19:351–357. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(98)01240-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



