Abstract
Molecular imaging with PET offers a broad variety of tools supporting the diagnosis of movement disorders. The more widely applied PET imaging techniques have focused on the assessment of neurotransmitter systems, predominantly the pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic system. Additionally, PET imaging with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose has been extensively used to assess local synaptic activity in the resting state and to highlight local changes in brain metabolism accompanying changes in neural activity in movement disorders. PET imaging has provided us with diagnostic agents as well as tools for evaluation of novel therapeutics, and has served as a powerful means for revealing in vivo changes at different stages of movement disorders and within the course of an individual patient’s illness.
Keywords: PET/CT, movement disorders, Parkinson’s disease
Introduction
Imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) represents a valuable clinical and research tool to visualize pathological changes in movement disorders. During the past decade, PET imaging has provided us with diagnostic agents as well as tools for evaluation of novel therapeutics, and has served as a powerful means for revealing in vivo changes at different stages of movement disorders.
The use of computed tomography (CT) in modern PET/CT scanners provides additional value to PET methodology. Technically, CT scanning allows accurate attenuation correction, and constitutes a superior substrate compared to PET alone for coregistration. In addition to its technical superiority for attenuation correction, the CT scan also provides help in excluding structural abnormalities as secondary causes of movement disorders.
The discovery of several radiopharmaceuticals useful for assessment of movement disorders has enormously simplified the clinical management of patients (Table 1). Emphasis has been placed on imaging of the dopaminergic system (Supporting Fig. S1), as well as other neurotransmission systems, which are affected in several movement disorders. Additionally, PET imaging with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has been extensively used to assess local synaptic activity in the resting state and to highlight local changes in brain metabolism accompanying movement disorders. This paper reviews PET findings in the major movement disorders (Table 2 and Fig. 1), including
Parkinson’s disease;
essential tremor;
atypical parkinsonisms (multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration);
Huntington’s disease;
ataxia; and
dystonia.
Table 1.
Radiotracer ligands used in PET investigations of movement disorders described in this chapter
| Radiotracer ligand | Function measured |
|---|---|
| [18F]DOPA | Dopamine synthesis through amino-acid decarboxylase, |
| and storage | |
| [11C]DTBZ | Type 2 vesicular monoamine transporters |
| [11C]dMP, [18F]FE@CIT, [18F]FP-CIT, [18F]FECNT, | Presynaptic dopamine transporters |
| [18F]CFT | |
| [11C]SCH23390 | Postsynaptic dopamine D1 receptors |
| [11C]raclopride, [18F]desmethoxyfallypride, | Postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptors |
| [18F]spiperone, [18F]fluoroethylspiperone | |
| [18F]FDG | Regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose |
| [11C]PK11195 | Activated microglia – neuroinflammation |
| [11C]diprenorphine | Opioid receptors |
| [11C]flumazenil | Benzodiazepine receptors |
| [11C]MP4A | Acetylcholinesterase activity |
| [18F]MK-9470 | Type 1 cannabinoid receptor |
Table 2.
Summary table of PET findings in the major movement disorders using the most common tracers
| Disease | Presynaptic dopaminergic ligands | Postsynaptic dopaminergic ligands | Functional ligands ([18F]FDG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parkinson’s disease | ↓ caudate nucleus, ↓↓ putamen | = or ↑ striatum | ↓ frontal, temporoparietal cortices, = or ↑ basal ganglia, thalamus |
| Multiple system atrophy | ↓ caudate nucleus, ↓↓ putamen | ↓ striatum | ↓ striatum (MSA-C), ↓ cerebellum (MSA-C), ↓ cortex (advanced stages) |
| Progressive supranuclear palsy | ↓↓ caudate nucleus, ↓↓ putamen | ↓ striatum | ↓ midline frontal regions, ↓ basal ganglia and brainstem |
| Corticobasal degeneration | Asymmetrical ↓ striatum (= ↓ caudate nucleus, ↓ putamen) | = or ↓ striatum | Asymmetrical ↓ cerebral hemisphere |
| contrataleral to affected side (↓ cortex, striatum, thalamus) | |||
| Huntington’s disease | = striatum | ↓↓ striatum | ↓↓ striatum, ↓ frontal and temporal cortex |
| Hereditary ataxias | ↓ striatum | = striatum | ↓↓ cerebellum; brainstem and cortical regions differently ↓ in SCA types |
| Dystonia | = striatum | ↓ striatum | DYT1: ↑ basal ganglia, cerebellum and supplementary motor area; DYT6: ↓ putamen, cerebellum, brainstem, thalamus, ↑ parietal association regions and supplementary motor area; DRD: ↓ putamen, motor/premotor cortex, ↑ midbrain, cerebellar vermis, and supplementary motor area |
Figure 1.

Illustration of the main findings in movement disorders with presynaptic (left) and postsynaptic dopaminergic (middle), and [18F]FDG PET imaging.
Parkinson’s disease
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease, affecting 1% of individuals of age 65–70 years, and 3% of individuals over age 80 years.1 Typical neuropathological alterations in PD are Lewy body inclusions and loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, resulting in progressive neuronal death in the nigrostriatal pathways and ultimately in the alteration of cortico-striatopallido-thalamocortical circuits.2 Histopathological lesions in PD precede the development of symptoms by several years, leading to motor disturbances after approximately 50–70% of dopaminergic neurons are lost.3
Clinically, PD is characterized by the presence of resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability. Other clinical criteria supporting PD diagnosis are the response to dopaminergic treatments, asymmetrical onset of symptoms, and the absence of atypical signs suggesting other forms of parkinsonism.4
Imaging of the dopaminergic system in PD
Dopamine synthesis
The PET tracer 3,4-dihy-droxy-6-[18F]fluoro-l-phenylalanine ([18F]DOPA) has been used in PD studies to evaluate the first step in dopaminergic transmission, namely dopamine synthesis, which takes place in the presynaptic dopaminergic neurons. [18F]DOPA is taken up into neurons by an active transport system and is converted to [18F]dopamine by aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase (AADC), which represents the rate-limiting step in dopamine synthesis in dopaminergic neurons (Supporting Fig. S1). As such, [18F]DOPA uptake reflects the synthetic ability of dopaminergic neurons to produce dopamine through AADC.
Several studies demonstrated a significant reduction of [18F]DOPA striatal uptake in PD patients compared to control subjects.5,6 The reduction is more severe in the putamen than in the caudate nucleus, and most prominent in the caudal parts of the putamen5 (Figs. 1 and 2). [18F]DOPA uptake correlates with clinical disease severity and with disease progression, with 8–9% annual decline in uptake rate constant in the putamen and 4–6% decline in caudate nucleus of clinical PD patients.6,7
Figure 2.

[18F]DOPA PET scans of a representative normal subject, a patient with PD, and a patient with atypical parkinsonism (progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP]). Image courtesy of Angela Cistaro, PET Center IRMET, Turin, Italy.
Potential disadvantages to the use of [18F]DOPA PET in the evaluation of dopaminergic system integrity are that the method may underestimate the severity of nigrostriatal loss due to upregulation of AADC activity, in particular, at early stages of disease. Additionally, tracer uptake may increase in patients undergoing treatment with dopaminergic medications.8
Dopamine storage in synaptic vesicles
The dopamine produced at the synaptic level is stored in synaptic vesicles by the type-2 vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2), which is responsible for translocating monoamine neurotransmitters from the cytoplasm into vesicles (Supporting Fig. S1). In the central nervous system, VMAT2 is expressed exclusively by monoaminergic neurons. Over 95% of striatal VMAT2 transporters are associated with dopaminergic terminals and striatal VMAT2 density is a linear function of the nigrostriatal neuron number.9 PET radiotracer [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine ([11C]DTBZ) is a specific ligand of VMAT2 and is used as an in vivo marker of nigrostriatal dopaminergic system integrity. Studies with [11C]DTBZ PET showed the expected pattern of decreased uptake in the corpus striatum in PD patients compared to control subjects, involving preferentially the putamen.10,11 [11C]DTBZ uptake is not affected by synaptic dopamine levels or dopaminergic agents, which makes the tracer one of the best available radioligands to examine dopaminergic system integrity.10
Dopamine transporters
Dopamine transporters (DAT) are located in the presynaptic dopaminergic nerve terminal. Dopamine reuptake through the DAT is the primary mechanism of dopamine removal from the region of the synaptic cleft (Supporting Fig. S1). A decrease in DAT density indicates decreased amount of presynaptic terminals that produce dopamine. Among many DAT-specific tracers used in PET and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, the cocaine analogs, 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-[4-[123I]iodophenyl] tropane ([123I](3-CIT) and N-ù-fluoropropyl-2â-carbomethoxy-3â-4- [123I]iodophenylnortropane ([123I]FP-CIT), are the most widely used in clinical practice due to their affinity to DAT and ability to assess decreased DAT density, which may precede clinical symptoms in PD. Therefore, the loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in PD is mirrored by striatal DAT reductions, which can be evaluated by a variety of [11C] or [18F] ligands.12,13 Quantitative evaluation of DAT plays an important role in clinical practice and is based on measurements of the tracer binding potential, defined as the ratio of uptake in a striatal region of interest to that of a brain area devoid of specific binding (usually cerebellum or occipital lobe).14
PET studies evaluating DAT availability, particularly with N-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-2â-carbomethoxy-3â-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane ([18F]FP-CIT)12 and 2â-carbomethoxy-3â-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)tropane ([18F]CFT),13 showed a reduction of striatal tracer uptake in PD patients compared to control subjects, affecting primarily the putamen and to a lesser extent the caudate nucleus. The reduction is typically more severe in the striatum contralateral to the earliest and most affected body side.12,13,15,16 Striatal DAT levels, particularly in the putamen, correlate with disease severity15 and decrease with PD progression.16
DAT imaging is useful in the management of patients with parkinsonian symptoms, and to support the clinical decision process in cases with uncertain diagnosis, particularly in the differential diagnosis between presynaptic and nonpresynaptic parkinsonism, and in cases of dubious symptoms.5
The effect of dopaminergic treatment on striatal DAT tracers uptake has been the object of investigation and controversy. Several SPECT and PET studies performed with different DAT tracers did not demonstrate significant effects of dopaminergic medications on DAT density,17 suggesting no interference between dopaminergic treatments and DAT tracers uptake. Further studies are needed to specifically examine possible interactions.
Dopamine receptors
Dopamine released into the synaptic cleft binds mainly to the postsynaptic striatal D2 receptors (Supporting Fig. S1), and the binding capacity of these receptors can be measured by several PET tracers. One such tracer is [11C]raclopride. PET studies with [11C]raclopride showed that striatal dopamine D2 binding to the postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors was either normal or increased in PD patients.18 This increase has been interpreted as a compensatory reaction to the reduction of striatal dopaminergic terminals.18 D2 receptor upregulation is most evident at early stages and contralateral to the clinically most affected side,19 and is usually the site of onset in PD. On the other hand, the increase in postsynaptic D2 receptor binding could also be due to loss of endogenous dopamine, thereby unloading the post-synaptic receptors and ultimately increasing uptake of [11C]raclopride or similar PET tracers in these receptors.
D2 receptor imaging is widely used for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism, since uptake is typically normal or increased in patients with PD, whereas patients with other forms of parkinsonism, such as multiple systematrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy show reduced tracer uptake.20,21
Chronic pharmacologic treatment may reduce D2 receptor availability, probably due to downregula-tion. It should be noted that in contrast, dyskinesia, a common motor symptom after chronic levodopa therapy, is not directly associated with D1 or D2 receptor density, as shown by a PET study using [11C]SCH23390 and [11C]raclopride, which demonstrated no differences in mean caudate and putamen D1 and D2 binding between dyskinetic and nondyskinetictreated PD patients.22
Metabolic imaging in PD
In addition to loss of dopaminergic neurons, damage to subcortical structures alters the functional connectivity across brain regions in a disease-specific manner. A recent meta-analysis of quantitative [18F]FDG PET studies revealed widespread cortical hypometabolism in PD.23 Nonquantitative [18F]FDG PET studies using normalization to the global gray matter activity consistently showed a pattern of relative cortical hypometabolism, particularly involving temporoparietal regions and increased metabolism in the putamen, globus pallidus, thalamus, brainstem, central cerebellum, white matter, and primary sensory-motor areas of PD patients (Fig. 3).24,25 Conversely, hypermetabolism is seen in subcortical structures and is evidenced by increased neuronal firing rates in animal models of PD.26 However, caution is necessary because relative metabolic increases may be artifactual dueto normalization of the globalgray mattermean, which is reduced in PD patients, as demonstrated in several quantitative [18F]FDG PET studies.27
Figure 3.

[18F]FDG PET scans of a representative cognitive normal individual (NL, left) and of four patients, each with a different movement disorder (from left to right): Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD).
Cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc) in primary and associative visual cortex, occipitotemporal area, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate gyrus is inversely correlated with motor impairment on clinical scales,28 which may represent an effect on the cortex of dopaminergic deficits in the striatum.29 Moreover, a recent double-tracer study in early-stage PD patients using [123I]FP-CIT and [18F]FDG PET demonstrated that CMRglc in premotor, dorsolateral prefrontal, anterior prefrontal, and orbitofrontal cortices, was significantly correlated with putaminal dopaminergic dysfunction,30 confirming the connection between striatum and frontal cortex.29
Formal network approaches using principal component analysis identified a PD-specific metabolic network characterized by relative hypermetabolism in the lentiform nucleus, thalamus, and brainstem, in conjunction with hypometabolism in the lateral premotor cortex and supplementary motor area.24 This pattern correlated with clinical impairment, was modulated by PD therapy, and discriminated PD patients from normal subjects and from atypical parkinsonian syndromes with high accuracy.25,31–33 [18F]FDG PET imaging has advantages over dopaminergic tracers, especially for clinical trials. First, [18F]FDG is widely available in most PET centers, including those without an onsite cyclotron. Second, the method allows one to quantify the effects of therapy, including reversible changes in brain metabolism.
Other tracers in PD: neuroinflammation
While there are currently no tracers that bind Lewy body inclusions in vivo, the glial reaction to the presence of pathology can be detected with PET. Microglial cells are normally in a resting state, but become activated in response to any local disturbance, such as inflammation, trauma, ischemia, tumor, and neurodegeneration.34 In PD, the loss of dopamine neurons is linked with activation of microglia within the substantia nigra, which might in turn promote degeneration of nigral neurons as the disease progresses.35
Mitochondria of activated microglia express peripheral benzodiazepine sites that bind the PET tracer [11C](1-(2-chrorophynyl)-N-methylpropyl)-3 iso-quinoline-carcoxamide ([11C]PK11195). PET imaging with [11C]PK11195 showed higher tracer uptake in midbrain,36 striatum, pallidum, and frontal cortex of PD patients compared to age-matched healthy subjects.37 Moreover, midbrain [11C]PK11195 binding was inversely correlated with DAT levels in the posterior putamen and positively correlated with the severity of motor impairment.36
Longitudinally, PD patients showed increases in [11C]PK11195 binding in the meso-basal gangliathalamo-cortical loop and in extrastriatal regions, especially in the occipital cortex. These findings are consistent with the observation that microglial activation, besides providing an immediate immune response, may trigger a cascade of inflammatory events that promote neurodegeneration.37 Due to its capability to show progression effects, PET with [11C]PK11195 represents a promising in vivo imaging technique for early detection and evaluation of neuroinflammation before and after therapy in PD.
Essential tremor
Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder, characterized by postural and kinetic tremors that most frequently occur in hands, arms, head, and neck. Tremor may occur at the beginning of, or during, voluntary movements (initial or kinetic tremor) or at the end of the movement (intentional tremor).38
Imaging studies show that the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system is relatively preserved in ET. Two multicenter studies using SPECT with DAT tracers demonstrated DAT reductions in parkinsonism but not in ET, reflecting a preserved dopaminergic system integrity in the latter condition.39,40 However, several ET patients with initial postural tremor develop resting tremor and accompanying dysfunction of the dopaminergic system. A [18F]DOPA PET study reported a 50% reduction of tracer uptake in the striatum of nine out of 11 patients with resting tremor, compared to only two out of 12 patients with postural tremor in parkinsonism.41
Atypical parkinsonism
The differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes from PD and from each other may be difficult, especially at early disease stages when the potential for misdiagnoses is the greatest.4,42 In PD clinical trials, the inclusion of atypical parkinsonism in lieu of PD is a hindrance to the assessment of treatment effects, as atypical parkinsonian patients may not respond to therapy and therefore confound results. Moreover, in clinical practice, correct and early diagnosis is fundamental as both prognosis and treatment options can differ substantially between PD and atypical parkinsonism.42
Multiple system atrophy
Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is the most common among atypical parkinsonian disorders, and the most frequently misdiagnosed. MSA is clinically characterized by the combined presence of parkinsonism, autonomic dysfunction, cerebellar ataxia, and pyramidal symptoms.43 Parkinsonism (typically akinesia, rigidity, postural tremor) prevails in 80% of patients (MSA-P subtype) and cerebellar ataxia (ataxia, dysarthria, oculomotor cerebellar symptoms) in 20% of patients (MSA-C subtype).
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in MSA
Dopaminergic degeneration typical of PD is present also in MSA. [18F]DOPA studies generally report severe reductions of striatal uptake in MSA (30% in putamen and 10% in caudate nucleus) compared to healthy subjects.5,21,44,45 [18F]DOPA uptake in the posterior putamen is more severely reduced than in anterior putamen or caudate nucleus, reaching levels similar to PD.5 As in PD, there is a significant correlation between the decrease in putaminal [18F]DOPAuptakeand disease severityin MSA.21
The usefulness of [18F]DOPA-PET for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism remains under debate. While some studies have shown that MSA patients present with more severe impairment of caudate dopaminergic nerve terminals than PD patients (suggesting a role for [18F]DOPA putamen/caudate ratios in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonisms),5 in other studies [18F]DOPA measurements did not distinguish between PD and MSA.44
[11C]DTBZ PET studies of the VMAT2 showed severe reductions of striatal monoaminergic terminals in MSA patients compared to controls, with reductions of 40–60% in both caudate and putamen.46,47 A comparison of MSA-P and MSA-C subtypes demonstrated that [11C]DTBZ uptake was significantly impaired in the putamen of MSA-P patients,47 PET studies of dopamine D2 receptors using both [11C]raclopride and [18F]desmethoxyfallypride revealed reduced striatal binding in MSA in comparison with controls,48,49 (a finding that was present already at early disease stages). D2 receptor binding is also reduced in MSA in comparison with PD patients,45,49 thus facilitating the discrimination between MSA and PD.21 This finding is consistent with the neuropathological differences between PD and MSA: neurodegeneration in PD involves only dopaminergic presynaptic neurons, while MSA is characterized by more widespread degeneration, involving both presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. As the effectiveness of dopaminergic therapy is associated with the integrity of striatal postsynaptic dopamine receptors, D2 receptor PET imaging could be a useful tool to predict dopaminergic responsiveness in MSA.
[18F]FDG PET imaging in MSA
[18F]FDG PET studies in MSA showed significant metabolic decreases in the striatum, particularly in the putamen, as well as in the brainstem and cerebellum, when compared to both normal subjects and patients with PD (Fig. 3).24,25,50–52 CMRglc reductions affect the cerebellum, brainstem, and striatum at the early stage of MSA, and then spreads to the cerebral cortex at later stages.51,52 [18F]FDG PET findings of striatal hypometabolism in MSA suggest that, besides postsynaptic dopaminergic system degeneration, feedback mechanisms within the motor loop may modulate striatal energy metabolism. There is a strong correlation between clinical symptoms and hypometabolism.53
[18F]FDG PET can be used for differentiating MSA from PD due to bilateral hypometabolism in the putamen of patients with MSA.25 Additionally, patients with MSA-P subtype show more pronounced striatal hypometabolism, whereas MSA-C-subtype patients exhibit cerebellar hypometabolism, which may help to distinguish between these forms of MSA.
Progressive supranuclear palsy
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is an akineticrigid syndrome clinically characterized by the combination of early postural instability, supranuclear vertical gaze palsy, parkinsonism not responsive to levodopa treatment, and dementia.54
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in PSP
Degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways has been reported in PSP as well as in PD, but with a different specific pattern.5 Striatal [18F]DOPA uptake is reduced in PSP patients, with similar uptake reductions in the putamen and caudate, reflecting loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic terminals.5 As compared to PD, PSP patients show significant reduction of [18F]DOPA uptake in caudate nucleus.5
Although PSP patients show symmetrical and profound DAT loss in the whole striatum, as previously mentioned for MSA, [18F]DOPA DAT imaging is of limited value in the differential diagnosis of PSP, PD, and atypical parkinsonism.55 On the other hand, D2 receptor imaging improves the differential diagnosis between PSP and PD. While striatal dopamine D2 binding is either normal or increased in PD patients, several PET studies reported reduced [11C]raclopride binding in PSP patients, with a 24% and 9% reduction in the caudate nucleus and putamen, respectively.48
[18F]FDG PET imaging in PSP
[18F]FDG PET studies in PSP patients show diffuse reductions in CMRglc, mostly involving the frontal cortex, particularly at the level of midline frontal areas, basal ganglia, and brainstem (Fig. 3),56 and additionally involving the anterior cingulate, motor and premotor cortex, striatum, and thalamus.25,57 Hypometabolism correlates with general intelligence scores and performance on tests, stratified by disease duration58 and locomotor function.58 The mechanisms underlying cortical metabolic reduction in the frontal areas in PSP are under debate. Degeneration of noradrenergic, serotoninergic, and dopaminergic projections may contribute to diffuse cortical hypofunction, while frontal hypometabolism in PSP is more likely due to degeneration of pallidal projections to frontal regions.
The specific pattern of hypometabolism in the brainstem and frontal cortex in PSP discriminates this disorderfromPD and atypicalparkinsonism.25
Corticobasal degeneration
Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is an adult-onset progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cortical and basal ganglionic degeneration. The cardinal manifestations of CBD include motor symptoms that are typically asymmetric at early stages and similar to those seen in PD (i.e., rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor). Patients with advanced disease show a progressive decline of cognitive function. There is no significant response to levodopa and dopamine agonists in CBD patients.59
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in CBD
[18F]DOPA PET studies performed in early CBD patients show more severe reductions of tracer uptake in the putamen, while uptake in the caudate nucleus is relatively preserved.60 Patients with more advanced disease show impairments of striatal [18F]DOPA uptake in the caudate nucleus to similar levels as in the putamen; with a predominance contralateral to clinical signs.61 Interestingly, dopaminergic degeneration in CBD is more asymmetrical and less pronounced than in MSA and PSP.55
Postsynaptic D2 receptor imaging seems to be of lower clinical value for CBD than in other parkinsonian syndromes (like MSA or PSP), since striatal D2 receptor binding in CBD patients is either normal62 or decreased compared to controls,63 with values more often in normal range than in MSA and PSP.
[18F]FDG PET imaging in CBD
On [18F]FDG PET, CBD patients present with asymmetrical hypometabolism, affecting the hemisphere contralateral to the first and most affected limbs (Fig. 3).61,64 Parietotemporal, prefrontal, and motor cortex, as well as basal ganglia and thalamus, are particularly affected in CBD. While CBD and other parkinsonian disorders have many common clinical features, the presence of unilateral cortical and unilateral balanced striatal (caudate nucleus/putamen) hypometabolism is specific to CBD patients differentiating it from PSP or PD.25,65
PET imaging of other neurotransmission systems
PET studies using [11C]diprenorphine investigated striatal opioid receptor density in patients with PD, MSA, and PSP, and showed a significant binding reduction in the caudate nucleus and putamen of PSP patients, and in the putamen of MSA patients, as compared to PD and normal controls.66 A PET study in PSP patients using [11C]flumazenil, a marker of neuronal integrity, demonstrated a 20% reduction of benzodiazepine receptors in the anterior cingulate cortex of PSP patients, which was accompanied by a significant reduction of [18F]FDG uptake.67 Finally, a PET study using [11C]MP4A (an indicator of acetylcholinesterase activity), demonstrated a significant reduction of cortical tracer uptake in PD patients and a prominent reduction of thalamic uptake in PSP patients, as compared to normal controls.68
Overall, these studies demonstrated that multi-modality PET imaging with tracers targeting different neurotransmission systems, including, but not limited to, those for the dopaminergic system, could be of great relevance to the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism.
Huntington’s disease
Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of capacity in movement control, cognition, and emotional regulation.
The primary genetic cause of HD is an expansion of a trinucleotide cytosine–adenine–guanine (CAG) in the IT15 gene on chromosome 4 and the number of CAG repeats is a major determinant of age of onset of HD.69 The characteristic neuropathological finding in HD is the selective striatal neuronal degeneration of small to medium size spiny neurons, beginning in the dorsal medial head of the caudate with subsequent progression to the ventrolateral striatum. Less pronounced neuronal loss has been observed in other subcortical and cortical structures.70 Brain atrophy of the striatum and neocortex following neuronal loss is evident several years prior to a diagnosis of HD.
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in HD
D2 receptors ligands ([11C]raclopride, [18F]fluoroethylspiperone) and D1 receptors ligands ([11C]SCH23390) have been extensively used to examine HD patients because the medium spiny neurons express these receptors. PET studies using the selective dopamine D1 ad D2 receptor antagonists [11C]SCH23390 and [11C]raclopride demonstrated > 40% reduced striatal D1 and D2 receptor binding in HD patients compared to normal controls.71 Such reductions in dopamine D1 and D2 receptor availability could represent loss of functioning receptors on intact but dysfunctional striatal neurons, as well as loss of receptors secondary to death of striatal neurons. Reductions of D1 and D2 receptor availability are strongly related to increasing illness duration and performance on several cognitive tasks.72 Longitudinal PET studies in HD patients demonstrated a mean annual decrease in D1 and D2 receptor binding of 5% and 3.2%, respectively.73,74
Similar to clinically symptomatic HD patients, the majority of asymptomatic HD mutation carriers show D1 and D2 receptors loss, with a mean reduction of up to 50% of striatal binding as compared to normal controls,75 as well as longitudinal decreases of D1 and D2 receptor binding.74
[18F]FDG PET imaging in HD
Since the first [18F]FDG PET studies in the 1980s, a large body of literature has accumulated showing diffuse cortical decreases in glucose use, preceding tissue loss, in HD patients.76 The presence of striatal hypometabolism is a consistent finding in HD patients, who also show reduced cortical CMRglc, involving in particular, the frontal and temporal lobes (Fig. 4).76,77 Reduced [18F]FDG uptake correlates with motor and functional abnormalities.78
Figure 4.

[18F]FDG PET scans of a representative patient with HD (right) compared to a control subject (left).
Similar metabolic reductions in striatum, frontal, and temporal lobes were observed in presymptomatic HD mutation carriers.79 Moreover, presymptomatic carriers present with thalamic hypermetabolism, which may represent a compensatory reaction to early neuronal loss.80
Longitudinal [18F]FDG PET studies in HD demonstrated significant CMRglc reductions over time in several cortical regions, including mostly frontal, temporal, parietal lobes, and striatum.77,81 Similar longitudinal effects were reported in presymptomatic HD subjects, with decreases in striatal metabolism as much as 2.3–7.6% per year, which were accompanied by a parallel increase in the expression of the HD-related pattern.77,82 Overall, metabolic reductions are an early feature of HD, preceding the clinical onset of HD symptoms by many years.
Novel PET tracers in Huntington’s disease
Based on postmortem findings of reduced type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) levels in HD brains, a few PET studies with the highly selective, high-affinity CB1 radioligand N-[2-(3-cyano-phenyl)-3-(4-(2-[18F]fluorethoxy)phenyl)-1-methylpropyl]-2-(5-methyl-2-pyridyloxy)-2-methylproponamide ([18F]MK-9470)83 demonstrated a profound and widespread reduction of CB1 availability in the gray matter of the cerebrum, in cerebellum and brainstem of HD patients, including those at early symptomatic stages of disease.83
GABA receptor density is also reduced in striatum of HD patients, as demonstrated by [11C]flumazenil PET studies.84 PET with [11C]flumazenil showed reduced binding in the caudate nucleus and normal values in the putamen of symptomatic, as well as of presymptomatic HD carriers.84
Finally, consistent with post-mortem findings of activated microglia in HD brains, several PET studies reported significant increases in [11C]PK11195 binding in the striatum, frontal, and parietal regions of symptomatic and presymptomatic HD gene carriers.85 Higher striatal [11C]PK11195 binding correlated with lower D2 receptors availability on [11C]raclopride and with a higher CAG repeat length.85
Ataxia
The term “ataxia” is used as a synonym for cerebellar syndrome, and includes several cerebellar signs (i.e., postural and gait abnormalities, extremities ataxia, tone abnormalities, tremor, dysarthria, oculomotor abnormalities). Ataxias can be divided into congenital, hereditary, and sporadic forms. Nonhereditary ataxias include idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxia, whose diagnosis derives from the exclusion of genetic and secondary causes of cerebellar degeneration. This paper focuses on the hereditary forms, for which functional imaging has been used for diagnostic purposes.
Hereditary ataxias are clinically characterized by slowly progressive gait disturbances, poor motor coordination of limbs, speech and ocular movements, and cerebellar atrophy. Hereditary ataxias are classified (according to the modality of genetic transmission and to the mutation responsible for the disorder) into autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial forms.
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias, also known as spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA), are the most common ataxias, and consist of a clinically, pathologically, and genetically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders that share clinical characteristics of deterioration in gait and balance, and various combinations of cerebral, extrapyramidal, bulbar, spinal, and peripheral nervous system involvement.86 Several different subtypes of SCA exist according to the mutation causing the disease. The most SCA common type is SCA3, also known as Machado–Joseph disease. Less frequent types of SCA are SCA1, SCA2, SCA6, SCA7, and SCA8, followed by other types with lower prevalence (http://www.geneclinics.org). Clinical manifestations in these types may include neuropathies and memory impairment among other symptoms. The mutation basis for all these SCA subtypes is an expanded trinucleotide repeat sequence within the coding regions of the involved genes.87
Other forms of hereditary ataxia include X-linked hereditary ataxia, and ataxia associated with mi-tochondrial disorders, such as MERRF (myoclonic epilepsy with ragged redfibers), NARP (neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa), or Kearns–Sayre syndrome.
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in ataxia
[18F]DOPA PET studies demonstrate reduced striatal tracer uptake in SCA6 patients, with reduced [18F]DOPA uptake in both the caudate nucleus and putamen, to similar levels as in patients with parkinsonism.88 [18F]DOPA findings suggest that subclinical nigrostriatal dysfunction may be present in SCA patients, resulting in subtle extrapyramidal signs in some cases.
SPECT and PET studies with DAT tracers confirm the involvement of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in some SCA patients.89 Striatal [11C]dMP (DAT ligand) binding potential was found to be markedly reduced in SCA2 and SCA3 patients, with a reduction of striatal tracer uptake involving the caudate nucleus and putamen (both in SCA2 and SCA3).89 Interestingly, the loss of DAT is less severe in SCA3 patients, suggesting that the dopaminergic systemcould be moresensitiveto SCA2 mutations.89 Absent or minimal dopaminergic impairment has been described in other types of hereditary ataxia (SCA1 and SCA6).89
Finally, D2 receptors imaging studies using [11C]raclopride show integrity of the postsynaptic dopaminergic system in patients with SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3, revealing no differences in striatal D2 re-ceptoravailability betweenSCA patients and normal controls.90
[18F]FDG PET imaging in ataxia
[18F]FDG PET studies in patients with different types of ataxia syndromes (sporadic or hereditary) consistently report hypometabolism of cerebellar hemispheres, cerebellar vermis, and brainstem.91 Cerebellar hypometabolism is a consistent feature of hereditary autosomal dominant ataxia, and is present in almost all SCA types. In addition to cerebellar hypometabolism, SCA1 patients show significant hypometabolism in the brainstem compared to controls.89 Hypometabolism in the cerebellum and pons/brainstem is also a frequent finding in symptomatic, as well asymptomatic, SCA2 carriers who present with additional hypometabolism of parahippocampal gyrus, and frontal, and parietal cortices.89,92 In SCA3, decreased CMRglc extends from cerebellar midline structures to the adjacent pons and midbrain, and then on to the occipital cortex.89,92 In addition to cerebellar hypometabolism, SCA6 patients show reduced CMRglc in the brain-stem, basal ganglia, and frontal, temporal, and occipital cerebral cortices.92 These results are, however, not consistent across studies.89
In conclusion, [18F]FDG PET imaging is useful for the early detection of SCA, and, as such, it may be of use in the identification of subjects suitable for both therapeutic intervention and to establish the timing of treatment and efficacy of response perhaps years before clinical presentation.
Dystonia
Dystonia is a syndrome characterized by sustained muscle contractions causing distorted voluntary movements or abnormal postures. Dystonia encompasses a wide spectrum of clinical entities including focal and generalized forms. Dystonias may also be divided into primary (unknown etiology) and secondary forms.93 The specific cause of primary dystonias is usually unknown, although it has become clearer that they are likely to have a genetic basis. The secondary forms result from specific factors such as exposure to certain medications, lesions of the basal ganglia, or trauma.
The most prevalent form of hereditary dystonia is early-onset generalized dystonia, resulting from the DYT1 mutation, a GAG deletion within the coding area for torsinA on chromosome 9q34.93 Another less frequent form of primary torsion dystonia is associated with a DYT6 mutation, linked to chromosome 8q21–22.93 Both mutations are inherited via autosomal dominant transmission with reduced penetrance. Clinical manifestations of dystonia are present in 30% of DYT1 and up to 60% of DYT6 mutation carriers.
Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is another form of idiopathic torsion dystonia characterized by early onset and diurnal fluctuations. Clinical features include dystonia, variable degrees of parkinsonism, and an excellent and sustained response to levodopa.93 DRD is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with reduced penetrance and is associated with mutations in the guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1 gene.93 Although DRD comprises a minority of patients with dystonia, it is of considerable diagnostic importance because of the excellent response to treatment.
PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in dystonia
The neurochemical basis of primary dystonia is currently unknown. However, multiple lines of evidence support the role of dopaminergic neurotrans-mission abnormalities inthemanifestation of symptoms. PET imaging with [18F]DOPA shows that the uptake rate constant is within normal range in DRD patients,94 indicating that aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase activity is not affected in this disor-der.94 Moreover, as compared to controls, DRD patients show increased [11C]DTBZ binding in both the caudate nucleus and putamen,94 which may be related to decreased competition for tracer binding from endogenous dopamine, or alternatively to elevated cell activity, or a combination of the two. Similar results were obtained with [11C]dMP PET, demonstrating striatal DAT radiotracer uptake within the normal range in DRD.94 Presynaptic dopaminergic imaging is therefore a practical approach to differentiate dystonia patients from parkinsonism, as DRD patients generally have normal uptake levels while PD patients show striatal uptake reductions.5,94
Several studies have reported decreased striatal D2 receptor availability in different forms of dystonia. In focal dystonia, PET imaging demonstrates a significant decrease of [18F]spiperone binding in the putamen, with a mean reduction of 29%.95 Reduced [11C]raclopride binding was found also in hereditary dystonia, affecting both dystonia-manifesting and dystonia-non-manifesting DYT1 mutation car-riers.96 The striatal D2 receptor loss reported in clinically unaffected DYT1 carriers suggests that postsynaptic dopaminergic deficits could be a trait feature of DYT1 dystonia, but not sufficient perse for symptoms to arise. Alternatively, clinical penetrance may be determined by the degree to which striatal binding is reduced in mutation carriers, suggesting that clinical signs in DYT1 carriers could emerge only after greater loss of striatal D2 receptor binding.
[18F]FDG PET imaging in dystonia
On [18F]FDG PET, dystonia patients typically show increased metabolism in the lentiform nucleus, basal ganglia, and associated outflow pathways to the sensorimotor cortex along with regions involved in motor performance.97,98 Interestingly, these metabolic abnormalities were present both in clinically silent and symptomatic carriers, as well as in symptomatic carriers when involuntary dystonic movements were suppressed during sleep. This suggests that this metabolic pattern, like the D2 receptor abnormality, could be a trait feature of DYT1 carrier status.98 Clinically silent carriers of the DYT6 mutation showed a different metabolic pattern characterized by CMRglc reductions in the putamen, cerebellum,99 and in the upper brainstem extending to the thalamus.97 In addition, clinically affected DYT6 carriers showed metabolic increases in the supplementary motor area and parietal association regions.97
DRD patients show a distinct metabolic pattern characterized by relative increases in the dorsal midbrain, cerebellar vermis, and supplemental motor area, evidencing covarying decrements in the putamen, lateral premotor, and motor cortical regions.100 This metabolic pattern is not expressed in dystonia gene carriers of the DYT1 or DYT6 gene mutation,100 thereby supporting the hypothesis of a different pathophysiology for DRD. Metabolic alterations in DRD patients share some features of both PD and torsion dystonia, as metabolic decreases in the lateral premotor region is a consistent feature of PD,24 while metabolic increases in supplemental motor area is a feature of PTD.98,99
In conclusion, metabolic abnormalities in dystonia could be useful to identify potential gene carriers among family members of dystonia patients, and to assess mechanisms of therapeutic interventions.
Supporting information
Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this paper.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/NIA Grants AG032554 and AG035137 and the Alzheimer’s Association.
Footnotes
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting material supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the paper.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Tanner CM, Goldman SM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Clin. 1996;14:317–335. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70259-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wichmann T, DeLong MR. Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease: the MPTP primate model of the human disorder. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;991:199–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morrish PK, Rakshi JS, Bailey DL, et al. Measuring the rate of progression and estimating the preclinical period of Parkinson’s disease with [F-18] dopa PET. J Neurol Neu-rosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:314–319. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.3.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–184. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brooks DJ, Ibanez V, Sawle GV, et al. Differing patterns of striatal 18F-dopa uptake in Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive sopranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:547–555. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bruck A, Aalto A, Nurmi E, et al. Striatal sub-regional 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa uptake in early Parkinson’s disease: a two-year follow-up study. Mov Disord. 2006;21:958– 963. doi: 10.1002/mds.20855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nurmi E, Ruottinen HM, Bergman J, et al. Rate of progression in Parkinson’s disease: a 6-[F-18]fluoro-l-dopa PET study. Mov Disord. 2001;16:608–615. doi: 10.1002/mds.1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee CS, Samii A, Sossi V, et al. In vivo positron emission tomographic evidence for compensatory changes in presynaptic dopaminergic nerve terminals in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:493–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vander Borght TM, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, et al. In vivo imaging of the brain vesicular monoamine transporter. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2252–2260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bohnen NI, Albin RL, Koeppe RA, et al. Positron emission tomography of monoaminergic vesicular binding in aging and Parkinson’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1198–1212. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Kilbourn MR, et al. Presynaptic monoaminergic vesicles in Parkinson’s disease and normal aging. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:873–884. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kazumata K, Dhawan V, Chaly T, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging with fluorine-18-FPCIT and PET. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1521–1530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rinne JO, Bergman J, Ruottinen H, et al. Striatal uptake of a novel PET ligand, [18F]beta-CFT, is reduced in early Parkinson’s disease. Synapse. 1999;31:119–124. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199902)31:2<119::AID-SYN4>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Innis RB, V, Cunningham J, Delforge J, et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1533–1539. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang J, Zuo CT, Jiang YP, et al. 18F-FP-CIT PET imaging and SPM analysis of dopamine transporters in Parkinson’s disease in various Hoehn & Yahr stages. J Neurol. 2007;254:185–190. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0322-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nurmi E, Bergman J, Eskola O, et al. Progression of dopaminergic hypofunction in striatal subregions in Parkinson’s disease using [18F]CFT PET. Synapse. 2003;48:109–115. doi: 10.1002/syn.10192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guttman M, Stewart D, Hussey D, et al. Influence of L-dopa and pramipexole on striatal dopamine transporter in early PD. Neurology. 2001;56:1559–1564. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.11.1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rinne UK, Laihinen A, Rinne JO, et al. Positron emission tomography demonstrates dopamine D2 receptor supersensitivity in the striatum of patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 1990;5:55–59. doi: 10.1002/mds.870050114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaasinen V, Ruottinen HM, Nagren K, et al. Upregulation of putaminal dopamine D2 receptors in early Parkinson’s disease: a comparative PET study with [11C]raclopride and [11C]N-methylspiperone. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:65–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Van Royen E, Verhoeff NF, Speelman JD, et al. Multiple system atrophy ad progressive supranuclear palsy. Diminished striatal D2 receptor activity demonstrated by 123I-IBZM single photon emission computed tomography. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:513–516. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050063017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Antonini A, Leenders KL, Vontobel P, et al. Complementary PET studies of striatal neuronal function in the differential diagnosis between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1997;120:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.12.2187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Turjanski N, Lees AJ, Brooks DJ. In vivo studies on striatal dopamine D1 and D2 site binding in L-dopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients with and without dys-kinesias. Neurology. 1997;49:717–723. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.3.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borghammer P, Chakravarty M, Jonsdottir KY, et al. Cortical hypometabolism and hypoperfusion in Parkinson’s disease is extensive: probably even at early disease stages. Brain Struct Funct. 2010;214:303–317. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0246-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eidelberg D, Moeller JR, Dhawan V, et al. The metabolic topography of parkinsonism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14:783–801. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eckert T, Barnes A, Dhawan V, et al. FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders. Neuroimage. 2005;26:912–921. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bezard E, Crossman AR, Gross CE, Brotchie JM. Structures outside the basal ganglia may compensate for dopamine loss in the presymptomatic stages of Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J. 2001;15:1092–1094. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0637fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Borghammer P, Cumming P, Aanerud J, et al. Sub-cortical elevation of metabolism in Parkinson’s disease—a critical reappraisal in the context of global mean normalization. Neuroimage. 2009;47:1514–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nagano-Saito A, Kato T, Arahata Y, et al. Cognitive-and motor-related regions in Parkinson’s disease: FDOPA and FDG PET studies. Neuroimage. 2004;22:553–561. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:266–271. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Berti V, Polito C, Ramat S, et al. Brain metabolic correlates of dopaminergic degeneration in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:537–544. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1259-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moeller JR, Makamura T, Mentis MJ, et al. Reproducibility of regional metabolic covariance patterns: comparison of four populations. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1264–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Asanuma K, Tang C, Ma Y, et al. Network modulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2006;129:2667–2678. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huang C, Mattis P, Tang C, et al. Metabolic brain networks associated with cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage. 2007;34:714–723. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–318. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ouchi Y, Yagi S, Yokokura M, Sakamoto M. Neu-roinflammation in the living brain of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15(Suppl 3):S200–S204. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70814-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ouchi Y, Yoshikawa E, Sekine Y, et al. Microglial activation and dopamine terminal loss in early Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:168–175. doi: 10.1002/ana.20338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gerhard A, Pavese N, Hotton G, et al. In vivo imaging of microglial activation with [11C](R)-PK11195 PET in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21:404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jankovic J. Essential tremor: a heterogenous disorder. Mov Disord. 2002;17:683–644. doi: 10.1002/mds.10221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Parkinson Study Group. A multicenter assessment of dopamine transporter imaging with DOPASCAN/SPECT in parkinsonism. Neurology. 2000;55:1540–1547. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.10.1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Benamer TS, Patterson J, Grosset DG, et al. Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]FP-CIT study group. Mov Disord. 2000;15:503–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brooks DJ, Playford ED, Ibanez V, et al. Isolated tremor and disruption of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system: an 18F-dopa PET study. Neurology. 1992;42:1554–1560. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.8.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Christine CW, Aminoff MJ. Clinical differentiation of parkinsonian syndromes: prognostic and therapeutic relevance. Am J Med. 2004;117:412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stefanova N, Bu¨cke P, Duerr S, Wenning GK. Multiple system atrophy: an update. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:1172– 1178. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70288-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Burn DJ, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. Differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy, and Steele–Richardson–Olszewski syndrome: discriminant analysis of striatal 18F-dopa PET data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:278–284. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.3.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ghaemi M, Hilker R, Rudolf J, et al. Differentiating multiple system atrophy from Parkinson’s disease: contribution of striatal and midbrain MRI volumetry and multi-tracer PET imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:517–523. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.5.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gilman S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, et al. Decreased striatal monoaminergic terminals in olivopontocerebellar atrophy and multiple system atrophy demonstrated with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:885–892. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gilman S, Koeppe RA, Junck L, et al. Decreased striatal monoaminergic terminals in multiple system atrophy detected with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:769–777. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199906)45:6<769::aid-ana11>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brooks DJ, Ibanez V, Sawle GV, et al. Striatal D2 receptor status in patients with Parkinson’s disease, stria-tonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with [11C] raclopride and positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:184–192. doi: 10.1002/ana.410310209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schreckenberger M, Hagele S, Siessmeier T, et al. The dopamine D2 receptor ligand 18F-desmethoxyfallypride: an appropriate fluorinated PET tracer for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1128–1135. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1465-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Eidelberg D, Takikawa S, Moeller JR, et al. Striatal hypometabolism distinguishing striatonigral degeneration from Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 33:518–527. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Otsuka M, Ichiya Y, Kuwabara Y, et al. Glucose metabolism in the cortical and subcortical brain structures in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease: a positron emission tomographic study. J Neurol Sci. 1996;144:77–83. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Taniwaki T, Nakagawa M, Yamada T, et al. Cerebral metabolic changes in early multiple system atrophy: a PET study. J Neurol Sci. 2002;200:79–84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00151-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Perani D, Bressi S, Testa D, et al. Clinical/metabolic correlations in multiple system atrophy: a fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:179–185. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540260085021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Litvan J, Bhatia KP, Burn DJ, et al. Movement Disorders Society Scientific Issues Committee Movement Disorder Society Scientific Issues Committee report: SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2003;18:467–486. doi: 10.1002/mds.10459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pirker W, Asenbaum S, Bencsits G, et al. [123I]beta-CIT SPECT in multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord. 2000;15:1158–1167. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200011)15:6<1158::aid-mds1015>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Foster NL, Gilman S, Berent S, et al. Cerebral hypometabolism in progressive supranuclear palsy studied with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1988;24:399–406. doi: 10.1002/ana.410240308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Klein RC, de Jong BM, de Vries JJ, Leenders KL. Direct comparison between regional cerebral metabolism in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2005;20:1021–1030. doi: 10.1002/mds.20493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Blin J, Baron JC, Dubois P, et al. Positron emission tomography study in progressive supranuclear palsy. Arch Neurol. 1990;47:747–752. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530070035009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mahapatra RK, Edwards MJ, Schott JM, Bathia KP. Corticobasal degeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:736–743. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00936-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Laureys S, Salmon E, Garraux G, et al. Fluorodopa uptake and glucose metabolism in early stages of corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol. 1999;246:1151–1158. doi: 10.1007/s004150050534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nagasawa H, Tanji H, Nomura H, et al. PET study of cerebral glucose metabolism and fluorodopa uptake in patients with corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Sci. 1996;139:210–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Plotkin M, Amthauer H, Klaffke S, et al. Combined 123I-FP-CIT and 123I-IBZM SPECT for the diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes: study on 72 patients. J Neural Transm. 2005;112:677–692. doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0208-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Frisoni GB, Pizzolato G, Zanetti O, et al. Corticobasal degeneration: neuropsychological assessment and dopamine D2 receptor SPECT analysis. Eur Neurol. 1995;35:50–54. doi: 10.1159/000117090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hirono N, Ishii K, Sasaki M, et al. Features of regional cerebral glucose metabolism abnormality in corticobasal degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2000;11:139–146. doi: 10.1159/000017227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Juh R, Pae CU, Kim TS, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in corticobasal degeneration in comparison with progressive supranuclear palsy using statistical mapping analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2005;383:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rinne JO, Burn DJ, Mathias CJ, et al. Positron emission tomography studies on the dopaminergic system and striatal opioid binding in the olivopontocerebellar atrophy variant of multiple system atrophy. Ann Neurol. 1995;37:568–573. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Foster NL, Minoshima S, Johanns J, et al. PET measures of benzodiazepine receptors in progressive supranu-clear palsy. Neurology. 2000;54:1768–1773. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hirano S, Shinotoh H, Shimada H, et al. Choliner-gic imaging in corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranu-clear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2010;133:2058– 2068. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Duyao M, Ambrose C, Myers R, et al. Trinucleotide repeat length instability and age of onset in Huntington’s disease. Nat Genet. 1993;4:387–392. doi: 10.1038/ng0893-387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Vonsattel JP, DiFiglia M. Huntington disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:369–384. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199805000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Turjanski N, Weeks R, Dolan R, et al. Striatal D1 and D2 receptor binding in patients with Huntington’s disease and other choreas. A PET study. Brain. 1995;118:689–696. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.3.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Backman L, Robins-Wahlin T, Lundin A, et al. Cognitive deficits in Huntington’s disease are predicted by dopaminergic PET markers and brain volumes. Brain. 1997;120:2207–2217. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.12.2207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Antonini A, Leenders KL, Eidelberg D. [11C]Raclopride-PET studies of the Huntington’s disease rate of progression: relevance of the trinucleotide repeat length. Ann Neurol. 1998;43:253–255. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Andrews TC, Weeks RA, Turjanski N, et al. Hunt-ington’s disease progression. PET and clinical observations. Brain. 1999;122:2353–2363. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.12.2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Antonini A, Leenders KL, Spiegel R, et al. Striatal glucose metabolism and dopamine D2 receptor binding in asymptomatic gene carriers and patients with Huntington’s disease. Brain. 1996;119:2085–2095. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.6.2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kuwert T, Lange H, Langen K, et al. Cortical and subcortical glucose consumption measured by PET in patients with Huntington’s disease. Brain. 1990;113:1405–1423. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.5.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ciarmiello A, Cannella M, Lastoria S, et al. Brain white-matter volume loss and glucose hypometabolism precede the clinical symptoms of Huntington’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:215–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Young AB, Penney JB, Starosta-Rubenstein S, et al. PET scan investigations of Huntington’s disease: cerebral metabolic correlates of neurological features and functional decline. Ann Neurol. 1986;20:296–303. doi: 10.1002/ana.410200305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mazziotta JC, Phelps ME, Pahl JJ, et al. Reduced cerebral glucose metabolism in asymptomatic subjects at risk for Huntington’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:357–362. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702123160701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Feigin A, Tang C, Ma Y, et al. Thalamic metabolism and symptom onset in preclinical Huntington’s disease. Brain. 2007;130:2858–2867. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Martin WR, Clark C, Ammann W, et al. Cortical glucose metabolism in Huntington’s disease. Neurology. 1992;42:223–229. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.1.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Feigin A, Leenders KL, Moeller JR, et al. Metabolic network abnormalities in early Huntington’s disease: an [18F]FDG PET study. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1591–1595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Van Laere K, Casteels C, Dhollander I, et al. Widespread decrease of type 1 cannabinoid receptor availability in Huntington disease in vivo. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1413–1417. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.077156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Künig G, Leenders KL, Sanchez-Pernaute R, et al. Benzodiazepine receptor binding in Huntington’s disease: [11C] flumazenil uptake measured using positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:644–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tai YF, Pavese N, Gerhard A, et al. Imaging microglial activation in Huntington’s disease. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72:148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hurko O. Recent advances in heritable ataxias. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:4–6. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Paulson HL, Fischbeck KH. Trinucleotide repeats in neurogenetic disorders. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:79–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Khan NL, Giunti P, Sweeney MG, et al. Parkinsonism and nigrostriatal dysfunction are associated with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6) Mov Disord. 2005;20:1115–1119. doi: 10.1002/mds.20564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wu¨llner U, Reimold M, Abele M, et al. Dopamine transporter positron emission tomography in spinocerebellar ataxias type 1, 2, 3, and 6. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1280–1285. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.8.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Reimold M, Globas C, Gleichmann M, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, and 3 and restless legs syndrome: striatal dopamine D2 receptor status investigated by [11C] raclopride positron emission tomography. Mov Disord. 2006;21:1667–1673. doi: 10.1002/mds.20978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Otsuka M, Ichiya Y, Kuwabara Y, et al. Striatal 18F-dopa uptake and brain glucose metabolism by PET in patients with syndrome of progressive ataxia. J Neurol Sci. 1994;124:198–203. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(94)90326-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang PS, Liu RS, Yang BH, Soong BW. Regional patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 3 and 6: a voxel-based FDG-positron emission tomography analysis. J Neurol. 2007;254:838– 845. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0383-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bressman SB. Dystonia genotypes, phenotypes, and classification. Adv Neurol. 2004;94:101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.De La Fuente-Fernandez R, Furtado S, Guttman M, et al. VMAT2 binding is elevated in Dopa-responsive dystonia: visualizing empty vesicles by PET. Synapse. 2003;49:20–28. doi: 10.1002/syn.10199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Perlmutter JS, Stambuk MK, Markham J, et al. Decreased [18F] spiperone binding in putamen in idiopathic focal dystonia. J Neurosci. 1997;17:843–850. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-02-00843.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Asanuma K, Ma Y, Okulski J, et al. Decreased striatal D2 receptor binding in non-manifesting carriers of the DYT1 dystonia mutation. Neurology. 2005;64:347–349. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149764.34953.BF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Carbon M, Eidelberg D. Abnormal structure-function relationships in hereditary dystonia. Neuroscience. 2009;164:220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Eidelberg D, Moeller JR, Antonini A, et al. Functional brain networks in DYT1 dystonia. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:303–312. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Carbon M, Su S, Dhawan V, et al. Regional metabolism in primary torsion dystonia: effects of pene-trance and genotype. Neurology. 2004;62:1384–1390. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000120541.97467.fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Asanuma K, Ma Y, Huang C, et al. The metabolic pathology of dopa-responsive dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:596–600. doi: 10.1002/ana.20442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
