Abstract
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a dangerous adverse response to antipsychotic drugs. It is characterized by the four major clinical symptoms of hyperthermia, severe muscle rigidity, autonomic dysfunction, and altered mental state. Serum creatine kinase (CK) elevation occurs in over 90% of NMS cases. In the present study, the detailed temporal changes in serum CK and degree of muscle rigidity, and the relationship between CK concentration and degree of muscle rigidity over the time course from fever onset, were evaluated in 24 affected patients. The results showed that serum CK peaked on day 2 after onset of fever and returned to within normal limits at day 12. Mild muscle rigidity was observed before the onset of fever in 17 of 24 cases (71%). Muscle rigidity was gradually exacerbated and worsened until day 4 after onset of fever. These findings confirm physicians’ empirical understanding of serum CK concentrations and muscle rigidity in NMS based on data accumulated from numerous patients with the syndrome, and they indicate that serum CK may contribute to the early detection of NMS.
Keywords: neuroleptic malignant syndrome, creatine kinase, muscle rigidity
Introduction
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a dangerous adverse response to antipsychotic drugs. The four major clinical symptoms of NMS are hyperthermia, severe muscle rigidity, autonomic dysfunction, and altered mental status. To date, several diagnostic criteria have been proposed for NMS. According to the diagnostic criteria of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR),1 the major symptoms are hyperthermia and severe muscle rigidity, and minor symptoms are diaphoresis, dysphagia, tremor, incontinence, changes in level of consciousness (ranging from confusion to coma), mutism, tachycardia, elevated or labile blood pressure, leucocytosis, and laboratory evidence of muscle injury (eg, elevated creatine kinase [CK]). The presence of two or more of the ten minor symptoms is necessary for a diagnosis of NMS.
Levenson2 suggested that elevated serum CK level is a major symptom used to diagnose NMS. This is in agreement with findings that serum CK is important for detecting NMS.3,4 On the other hand, it has been reported5–7 that elevated CK levels are of relatively little importance in the diagnosis of NMS. However, elevated CK concentrations have been found in over 90% of patients with NMS.2,5,8 As elevated CK is prevalent in the early stage of NMS,9 clarification of the temporal appearance of serum CK may assist in the diagnosis of NMS.
Muscle rigidity is a major symptom used to diagnose NMS. Numerous case reports on NMS have been published, but there have been no detailed studies on how muscle rigidity develops during NMS. Furthermore, the relationship between CK concentration and the degree of muscle rigidity over the time course of NMS from onset has not been established.
In the present study, changes in serum CK and degree of muscle rigidity, and the temporal relationship between these factors, were evaluated in a large number of patients with NMS.
Methods
Patients
Between 1985 and 2012, 38 patients were treated in the authors’ department for typical NMS, characterized by a fever (temperature >38°C), muscle rigidity, altered consciousness, autonomic dysfunction, and abnormal laboratory findings including elevated CK and leucocytosis. In a case of suspected NMS, body temperature and degree of muscle rigidity can be evaluated on a daily basis, but serum CK level cannot always be measured this regularly. In order to evaluate temporal alterations in serum CK, measurements must be taken several times during the episode of NMS. Serum CK levels could be evaluated only two or three times during the NMS episode in 12 of the 38 patients; therefore, it was difficult to evaluate temporal changes in serum CK in these 12 patients because the number of CK measurements was small. There were two patients in whom serum CK level could be evaluated first on day 7 after the onset of fever; therefore, it was difficult to evaluate the first weekly changes of serum CK in these two patients. Thus, these 14 patients were excluded from the present study. Overall, 24 patients in whom serum CK level could be evaluated temporally were selected for the present study. As already noted, all 24 patients had hyperthermia (temperature >38°C), muscle rigidity, altered consciousness, and autonomic disturbances including diaphoresis, tachycardia, labile blood pressure, and hypersalivation, and all cases met the criteria for NMS proposed in Levenson,2 Caroff and Mann,5 and the DSM-IV-TR.1 A summary of patient characteristics is shown in Table 1. We have previously reported monoamine levels in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with NMS.10–12 Specifically, cases 1–3 in Table 1 correspond to cases 2, 4, and 5, respectively, in the first of these reports; cases 4–9 correspond to cases 1–4, 6, and 11 in the second report; and cases 10–15 correspond to cases 1–6 in the third report. Cases 16–23 have not been previously reported. Cases 1 and 24 have been reported recently.13
Table 1.
Case | Sex/age (years) | Underlying diseases | Medications before fever onset | Max body temperature (°C) | Diaphoresis | Mental status change | Duration from the onset of fever to disappearance of NMS symptoms | Treatment of NMS | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M/32 | Schizophrenia | HLP, CP, promethadine orally →CP, HLP im | 39.8 (day 2) | + | + | 19 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
2 | F/42 | Schizophrenia | Fluphenazine depot | 38.9 (day 2) | + | + | 24 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
3 | F/37 | Mental retardation | HLP, CP, Promethadine orally | 38.5 (day 5) | + | + | 17 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
4 | M/21 | Schizophrenia | CP, HLP, bromperidol Trihexyphenidyl orally | 39.2 (day 4) | + | + | 16 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
5 | F/28 | Bipolar disorder | HLP, biperiden, mianserin orally →HLP im | 39.0 (day 3) | + | + | 12 | Dantrolene Bromocriptine | Recovered |
6 | M/40 | Mental retardation | HLP, promethadine orally →CP im | 39.0 (day 10) | + | + | 29 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
7 | M/38 | Schizophrenia | LP, sultpride, Promethadine orally | 39.5 (day 1) | + | + | 11 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
8 | M/21 | Schizophrenia | Bromperidol, sultpride Biperiden orally →LP im | 39.9 (day 6) | + | + | 17 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
9 | F/28 | Schizophrenia | HLP iv | 38.0 (day 13) | + | + | 18 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
10 | F/59 | Major depression Parkinson’s syndrome | Amantadine, trihexyphenidyl Trazodone orally | 38.0 (day 1) | + | + | 9 | Dantrolene Amantadine | Recovered |
11 | M/44 | Mental retardation | HLP, trihexyphenidyl orally →HLP iv | 41.0 (day 5) | + | + | 20 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
12 | F/25 | Bipolar disorder Mental retardation | Zotepine, lithium Biperiden orally | 40.0 (day 2) | + | + | 14 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
13 | F/31 | Schizophrenia | Risperidone, biperiden orally | 39.8 (day 1) | + | + | 15 | Dantrolene L-dopa | Ricovered |
14 | F/25 | Bipolar disorder Mental retardation | Thioridazine orally | 38.2 (day 1) | + | + | 8 | Dantrolene | Revovered |
15 | M/35 | Schizophrenia | CP, trihexyphenidyl, Prometadine orally → HLP im | 40.6 (day 9) | + | + | 14 | Dantrolene L-dopa | Recovered |
16 | F/59 | Major depresson Parkinson’s syndrome | Amantadine, clonazepam Setiptiline orally | 39.7 (day 4) | + | + | 8 | ECT | Recovered |
17 | M/30 | Schizophrenia | Thioridazine, sulpride orally | 38.4 (day 3) | + | + | 9 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
18 | M/29 | Schizophrenia | Sultpride, lithium, Biperiden orally | 38.5 (day 2) | + | + | 8 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
19 | M/49 | Schizophrenia | Sulpiride, biperiden orally | 39.5 (day 8) | + | + | 14 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
20 | F/60 | Schizophrenia Mental retardation | Risperidone, olanzapine Biperidene orally | 38.6 (day 1) | + | + | 12 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
21 | F/48 | Bipolar disorder | Risperidone, zotepine Olanzapine orally | 38.9 (day 2) | + | + | 14 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
22 | M/60 | Schizophrenia | HLP, zotepine, Trihexyphenidyl orally | 40.6 (day 13) | + | + | 13 | Dantrolene | Died |
23 | M/41 | Schizophrenia | Olanzapine, Paliperidone orally | 39.2 (day 7) | + | + | 16 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
24 | F/29 | Mental retardation Bipolar disorder | Paliperidone, CP orally → Metoclopramide iv | 39.8 (day 14) | + | + | 21 | Dantrolene | Recovered |
Abbreviations: CP, chlorpromazine; HLP, Haloperidol; im, intramuscular; iv, intravenous; LP, levomepromazine; NMS, neuroleptic malignant syndrome; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy.
The summary of temporal changes in CK and muscle rigidity in individual patients is shown in Table 2. The first day on which fever of unknown etiology is observed is considered day 1. It should be noted that extrapyramidal symptoms persist in some patients with NMS after hyperthermia has subsided.14 Therefore, when patients become afebrile, disturbance of consciousness improves, and no autonomic dysfunction (ie, diaphoresis, tachycardia, and labile blood pressure) is observed, NMS is considered to have resolved. Taking case 1 as an example, NMS was sustained for 19 days. During the episode of NMS, serum CK was measured first on day 2, and six times thereafter. Including a further measurement after improvement of NMS, serum CK was measured a total of nine times. CK concentration peaked (722 IU/L) on day 3. Case 1 did not present with muscle rigidity until day 8 after the onset of fever.
Table 2.
Case | Serum CK (IU/L)
|
Muscle rigidity
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max value | The first day of increased CK (day) | Peak day of CK (day) | Number of measurement of CK (times) | Existence before fever onset (evaluation) | Appearance day (day) | Peak evaluation | |
1 | 722 | 2 | 3 | 9 | −/(0) | 8 | 3 |
2 | 1277 | 2 | 2 | 12 | −/(0) | 4 | 3 |
3 | 1236 | 4 | 8 | 8 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
4 | 2890 | 1 | 6 | 13 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
5 | 3854 | 3 | 3 | 6 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
6 | 495 | 2 | 2 | 8 | −/(0) | 3 | 3 |
7 | 3180 | 2 | 2 | 7 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 2 |
8 | 10,190 | 1 | 6 | 6 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
9 | 887 | 5 | 5 | 6 | −/(0) | 5 | 2 |
10 | 9580 | 1 | 1 | 8 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
11 | 1688 | 1 | 8 | 8 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
12 | 44,880 | 2 | 2 | 7 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
13 | 22423 | 1 | 2 | 9 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
14 | 1558 | 3 | 4 | 5 | −/(0) | 2 | 2 |
15 | 2238 | 1 | 10 | 6 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
16 | 777 | 5 | 5 | 7 | +/(2) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
17 | 7346 | 3 | 3 | 7 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
18 | 772 | 2 | 2 | 6 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
19 | 9610 | 4 | 9 | 5 | −/(0) | 7 | 2 |
20 | 1426 | 1 | 5 | 8 | +/(2) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
21 | 3949 | 1 | 2 | 5 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
22 | 839 | 4 | 4 | 4 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
23 | 2755 | 1 | 7 | 11 | +/(1) | Before onset of fever | 3 |
24 | 4273 | 4 | 4 | 6 | −/(0) | 12 | 3 |
Note: The degree of muscle rigidity was evaluated using the NMS scale proposed by Sachdev.15
Abbreviations: CK, creatine kinase; NMS, neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
The NMS evaluation scale proposed by Sachdev15 was used to monitor temporal changes in muscle rigidity: 0, nil (no rigidity); 1, mild (slight rigidity present, particularly obvious on recruitment of muscles responsible for jaw clenching); 2, moderate (rigidity definitely present to a significant degree but produces no limitation of passive movement); and 3, severe (rigidity that produces some limitation of passive movement). The NMS scale was proposed by Sachdev in 2005, enabling us to evaluate patients encountered since 2005 directly using this scale. Prior to 2005, we evaluated the temporal degree of muscle rigidity in patients using the Ashworth Scale16 or the modified Ashworth Scale17 to evaluate the movement of joints. The obtained data enabled us to retrospectively evaluate the temporal degree by using the scale proposed by Sachdev.
Because we did not measure body temperature in the days before fever onset in all patients, we retroactively used temperature readings taken on day −3 and day −7 and added them to Table 3.
Table 3.
Body temperature | Serum CK | Evaluation of muscle rigidity | |
---|---|---|---|
Before fever onset (Day −3 and Day −7) | 36.6 ± 0.5 (n = 20) | – | Day −10.78 ± 0.58 (n = 24) |
Day 1 | 38.2 ± 0.7* (n = 24) | 1414 ± 2675 (n = 11) | 1.00 ± 0.88 (n = 24) |
Day 2 | 38.2 ± 0.7* (n = 24) | 7853 ± 13,256** (n = 11) | 1.39 ± 1.05 (n = 24) |
Day 3 | 38.1 ± 0.9* (n = 24) | 4773 ± 6271 (n = 13) | 1.65 ± 1.12* (n = 24) |
Day 4 | 38.1 ± 0.8* (n = 24) | 1795 ± 2715 (n = 14) | 1.91 ± 1.05* (n = 24) |
Day 5 | 37.8 ± 0.9* (n = 23) | 1191 ± 1895 (n = 12) | 1.78 ± 0.97* (n = 24) |
Day 6 | 37.7 ± 0.7* (n = 24) | 2023 ± 2798 (n = 11) | 1.69 ± 1.08* (n = 24) |
Day 7 | 37.5 ± 0.6* (n = 23) | 938 ± 1106 (n = 11) | 1.56 ± 1.05* (n = 24) |
Day 8 | 37.7 ± 0.7* (n = 23) | 1502 ± 1977 (n = 13) | 1.52 ± 0.92* (n = 24) |
Day 9 | 37.7 ± 0.9* (n = 24) | 959 ± 2411 (n = 14) | 1.17 ± 0.91* (n = 24) |
Day 10 | 37.6 ± 0.8* (n = 23) | 693 ± 788 (n = 5) | 1.08 ± 0.92 (n = 24) |
Day 11 | 37.5 ± 0.8* (n = 21) | 380 ± 446 (n = 10) | 1.04 ± 1.04 (n = 24) |
Day 12 | 37.5 ± 0.9* (n = 21) | 165 ± 92 (n = 9) | 0.78 ± 1.01 (n = 24) |
– | – | – | – |
After recovery | 36.8 ± 0.3 (n = 23) | 104 ± 71 (n = 23) | 0.14 ± 0.46 (n = 23) |
Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± SD values. Data are shown until day 12 from the onset of fever because mean serum creatine kinase was normalized on day 12 (normal range 46–210 IU/L). Statistically significant differences are indicated as follows:
P < 0.05 (versus before fever onset);
P = 0.007 (versus after recovery).
Abbreviations: CK, creatine kinase; SD, standard deviation.
Temporal changes (mean ± standard deviation) in body temperature, serum CK concentration, and degree of muscle rigidity during the course of NMS are shown in Table 3.
Statistical analysis
All statistical tests were conducted using SPSS version 11 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). A one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s post hoc test was used to analyze changes in body temperature, serum CK levels, and degree of muscle rigidity. Baseline values of serum CK were considered to be those after recovery because values before fever were not available. The relationship between serum CK and degree of muscle rigidity was examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
The mean age of the study participants (12 men and 12 women) was 38 years (range 21–60 years). The mean highest temperature was 39.3°C (range 38.0°C−41.0°C). The mean duration of NMS was 14.8 days (range 8–29 days). There was great variability among the peak CK concentrations, ranging from 495 to 44,880 IU/L. As shown in Table 1, there were only six patients who received intramuscular injections before fever onset. The mean number of CK measurements in each case was 7.4 (range 4–13) and the total number of measurements was 177 for the 24 cases. As also shown in Table 2, the most common day for CK concentration to peak was day 2 of NMS (seven cases), followed by days 3, 4 and 5 (three cases each). Mild muscle rigidity was observed in 17 of 24 cases (71%) before the onset of fever. During the course of NMS, the strongest grade of rigidity, 3, was seen in 20 patients and grade 2 was seen in four patients. NMS resolved in 23 patients without sequelae and one patient (case 22) died.
As shown in Table 3, overall serum CK peaked on day 2 and normalized to 165 IU/L (mean) (normal range 46–210) on day 12. The degree of muscle rigidity peaked on day 4 and gradually decreased thereafter. Average body temperature peaked on days 1 and 2 and gradually decreased during NMS. Pearson’s correlation test demonstrated that serum CK concentration was positively correlated with the degree of muscle rigidity (R2=0.0392, P < 0.01 [Figure 1]).
Discussion
The main findings of this study are: (1) serum CK peaked on day 2 after the onset of fever and returned to within normal limits by day 12; and (2) mild muscle rigidity was observed before the onset of fever in 17 of 24 cases (71%) and was worst on day 4.
Serum CK is usually elevated following intramuscular injection, strenuous exercise, trauma, muscular injuries, acute psychosis, and restraint. Hence, elevated CK is not specific to NMS and is therefore not a reliable diagnostic parameter. The diagnosis of NMS should be based on four clinical symptoms: fever, altered consciousness, muscle rigidity, and autonomic dysfunction. However, it has been established that elevated CK is found in over 90% of patients with NMS.2,5,8 Therefore, if patients treated with antipsychotics develop a fever of unknown cause and their serum CK levels are elevated NMS should be suspected in addition to other conditions in which serum CK levels are elevated. If muscle rigidity is observed, the patient has a higher risk of developing NMS. Therefore, it is important for diagnosing NMS to understand how serum CK concentration and the degree of muscle rigidity change during the course of NMS.
Harsch18 reported that CK concentration peaked 24–48 hours after onset in nine cases of NMS, and Rosebush and Stewart19 reported among 24 episodes of NMS a peak on days 2 and 3 after onset in 64% of episodes, on days 4 to 7 in 29%, and on day 1 in 7%. The present study is the first to examine temporal changes in serum CK in numerous NMS cases, and the present results confirm the above findings.
Muscle rigidity was observed in 17 of 24 cases (71%) before the onset of fever. Velamoor et al20 investigated 222 NMS patients previously reported and concluded that mental status change or muscle rigidity was the initial manifestation in 82.3% of cases. The present research findings support their results to some extent. Velamoor et al did not evaluate when the degree of muscle rigidity became most severe; however, the results of the present study demonstrate a peak on day 4 after the onset of fever. Taken together, in many cases it appears that serum CK concentration rapidly increases after the onset of fever, peaks on day 2, and normalizes on day 12. By contrast, mild muscle rigidity is present at the onset of NMS in 71% of cases and peaks on day 4. On the other hand, we reported exceptional cases of NMS with regard to temporal changes in serum CK and muscle rigidity.13 As muscle rigidity first appeared after serum CK had normalized in cases 1 and 24, physicians should be aware of the existence of these uncommon findings.
We calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between serum CK levels and degree of muscle rigidity and noted a significant positive but weak correlation (r = 0.198). Serum CK is elevated in numerous situations. To conclude that elevated CK is significantly associated with degree of muscle rigidity, it is necessary to rule out other factors including intramuscular injection, strenuous exercise, and acute catatonia. Therefore, at present, we are unable to ascertain whether elevated CK is associated with muscle rigidity.
Average body temperature peaked on days 1 and 2, and gradually decreased during the course of NMS in 24 cases. As shown in Table 1, the day of maximal body temperature was variable. It is possible that low-grade fever preceded the appearance of hyperthermia (temperature > 38°C). As we did not measure body temperature on the day prior to hyperthermia onset in any cases, it is unclear whether body temperature generally peaks on day 1 or 2 of NMS.
Some limitations of the present study should be considered. First, the study was carried out retrospectively to assess the degree of muscle rigidity. It will be necessary to examine this condition prospectively in a large sample population with NMS. Second, serum CK was randomly measured in each patient; daily measurement of CK is difficult because NMS is rare and measurement of serum CK is not a routine examination.
In conclusion, serum CK levels peaked on the second day after onset of fever. Mild muscle rigidity was observed in about 71% of 24 cases, and the degree of muscle rigidity was worst on the fourth day, after which it gradually resolved. The findings of our study confirm physicians’ empirical knowledge of serum CK concentration and muscle rigidity in NMS based on the data accumulated from numerous patients with this syndrome.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Koichirou Kishi, Professor of Jichi Medical University Center for Information, for his support with the statistical analysis.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 2000. Medication-induced movement disorders: neuroleptic malignant syndrome; pp. 795–798. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Levenson JL. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142(10):1137–1145. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.10.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carroll BT, Surber SA. The problem of atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case report. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2009;6(7):45–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neuhut R, Lindenmayer JP, Silva R. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in children and adolescents on atypical antipsychotic medication: a review. J Child Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2009;19(4):415–422. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Caroff SN, Mann SC. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 1993;77(1):185–202. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30278-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buckley PF, Hutchinson M. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry. 1995;58(3):271–273. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.3.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Susman VL. Clinical management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Q. 2001;72(4):325–336. doi: 10.1023/a:1010389215197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Addonizio G, Susman VL, Roth SD. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: review and analysis of 115 cases. Biol Psychiatry. 1987;22(8):1004–1020. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(87)90010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Védie C, Poinso F, Hemmi F, Rivet B. Major symptoms and differential diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: three case reports. Eur Psychiatry. 2000;15(5):334–337. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(00)00403-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nisijima K, Ishiguro T. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a study of CSF monoamine metabolism. Biol Psychiatry. 1990;27(3):280–288. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(90)90002-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nisijima K, Ishiguro T. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of monoamine metabolites and gamma-aminobutyric acid in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Psychiat Res. 1995;29(3):233–244. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(95)00007-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nisijima K, Shioda K, Iwamura T. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome. Prog Brain Res. 2007;162:81–104. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)62006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nisijima K. Elevated creatine kinase does not necessarily correspond temporally with onset of muscle rigidity in neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a report of two cases. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012;8:615–618. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S38638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Panagariya A, Sharma B, Singh R, Agarwal V, Dev A. The neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a report of 14 cases from north India. Neurol India. 2007;55(2):166–168. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.32793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sachdev PS. A rating scale for neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatry Res. 2005;135(3):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964;192:540–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashwworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206–207. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harsch HH. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: physiological and laboratory findings in a series of nine cases. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48(8):328–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosebush P, Stewart T. A prospective analysis of 24 episodes of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(6):717–725. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.6.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Velamoor VR, Norman RM, Caroff SN, Mann SC, Sullivan KA, Antelo RE. Progression of symptoms in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994;182(3):168–173. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199403000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]