Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol Screen. 2013 Feb 27;18(6):705–713. doi: 10.1177/1087057113476090

High throughput identification of promiscuous inhibitors from screening libraries with the use of a thiol-containing fluorescent probe

Megan M McCallum *, Premchendar Nandhikonda *, Jonathan J Temmer *, Charles Eyermann , Anton Simeonov , Ajit Jadhav , Adam Yasgar , David Maloney , Leggy A Arnold *,*
PMCID: PMC3692575  NIHMSID: NIHMS453562  PMID: 23446699

Abstract

Testing small molecules for their ability to modify cysteine residues of proteins in the early stages of drug discovery is expected to accelerate our ability to develop more selective drugs with lesser side effects. In addition, this approach also enables the rapid evaluation of the mode of binding of new drug candidates in respect to thiol-reactivity and metabolism by glutathione. Herein, we describe the development of a fluorescence-based high throughput assay that allows the identification of thiol-reactive compounds. A thiol-containing fluorescent probe MSTI was synthesized and used to evaluate small molecules from the LOPAC collection of bioactive molecules. LOPAC compounds that are known to react with sulfur nucleophiles were identified with this assay, for example, irreversible protease inhibitors, nitric oxide releasing compounds, and proton-pump inhibitors. The results confirm that both electrophilic and redox reactive compounds can be quickly identified in a high throughput manner enabling the assessment of screening libraries in respect to thiol-reactive compounds.

Keywords: Promiscuous inhibitors, glutathione, fluorescence, high throughput screening, thiol-reactive or electrophilic compound

INTRODUCTION

Confirmation of activity and selectivity of hit molecules identified by high throughput screening (HTS) is an essential part of drug discovery. Especially for inhibitor screens, this often results in hundreds to thousands of hit molecules. The characterization of these molecules by secondary screens, which are not always amendable to a higher throughput format, leads to a bottleneck in the discovery pipeline. Frequently, these hit molecule selections contain a large number of promiscuous inhibitors that have a very poor outcome in the following steps of drug discovery. Multiple underlying non-specific mechanism have been identified for these inhibitors, such as aggregation,1 redox activity,2 protein modification,3 and compound interference with the assay signal.4 High throughput assays have been developed to detect compound aggregation5 and redox active compounds.6 The application of alternative detection methods such as different fluorescent dyes or luminescence can be used as a secondary assay in order to rule out false positive HTS hits based on signal interference. Finally, cheminformatics with promiscuity/reactive functionality filters are often applied to identify reactive molecules among hit compounds.7 Importantly, some FDA approved drugs would be filtered out by these filters such as irreversible H+, K+-ATPases inhibitors for duodenal and gastric ulcer.

Currently, HTS assays that determine the electrophilic properties of small molecules, thus the ability to react with natural occurring thiols, have yet to be fully developed. One of the few approaches is a competitive binding assay using glutathione and fluorescein-5-maleimide.8 Although, this assay could be adapted to high throughput, it does not allow for the differentiation between electrophilic compounds that react with glutathione and nucleophilic compounds that react with fluorescein-5-maleimide. Additionally, many screening compounds interfere with the yellow/green fluorescence detection at 480/520 nm.4 More recently, another lower-throughput, method has been developed using HSQC NMR by monitoring the 13C shift of small molecules that bind to the thiols in a La antigen protein.9 As such, there is still a great need for a simple high throughput method that can accurately assess the thiol-binding abilities of small molecules.

Herein we present the development of a fluorescence-based (E)-2-(4-mercaptostyryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium (MSTI) assay that enables the identification of thiol-reactive small molecules in a high throughput manner. In contrast to the very low throughput detection of small molecule–glutathione adducts using HPLC, we have developed a nucleophilic fluorescent probe, with discreet fluorescence at 510/650 nm. The MSTI assay enables the detection of thiol-reactive compounds in a multi-well plate format in contrast to many reported fluorescent sulfur-based probes that have been developed for the detection of thiol-disulfide equilibria in biological samples.10 To our knowledge the MSTI assay enables researchers to detect thiol-reactive compounds within large screening libraries for the first time. Strong electrophilic drug candidates can represent a liability in drug discovery because of their elevated toxicity in cell-based assays and in vivo studies. These compounds can form non-specific protein interactions, cause allosteric structural protein changes and deplete glutathione levels, which are essential for the redox chemistry of the cell.11 Using the MSTI assay theses promiscuous inhibitors can be identified in a high throughput manner and eliminated at an early discovery stage of drug discovery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Materials

All materials were used as they were received, with no further purification. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was prepared in 1L batches using 18 MΩ water with 3.23 mM K2HPO4·7H2O (J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ), 7.84 mM KH2PO4 (J.T. Baker), 5 mM KCl (Fisher), 150 mM NaCl (Fisher, Fair Lawn, NJ), and adjusted to pH 7.0 with HCl (Mallinckrodt) and NaOH (Fisher). The absorbance readings were completed in a 384 well UV plate (Greiner Bio-One, 781801). The assay was performed in a 384 flat bottom well black assay plate (Corning, 3573) which was sealed with an aluminum cover (Corning, 6570) during incubation and mixing.

Instrumentation

All of the absorbance and fluorescence readings were performed on a Tecan Infinite M1000 plate reader. Small volume transfers were performed on the Tecan Freedon EVO liquid handling system with a 100 nL pin tool (V&P Scientific). Chromatograms and mass spectra of molecules and reaction products were collected using a Thermo Surveyor MSQ liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (Thermo Fischer, Billerica, MA) LC-MS with an APCI probe with 10 μA corona or ESI probe with 3 kV capillary, 350°C probe temperature, and Waters XBridge C18, 5 μm, 4.6x30 mm column. A Biotage SP1 flash chromatography system and Gilson preparative LC (Prep. LC) (215 Liquid Handler, 306 Pump, 112 UV Detector) with a Waters XTerra Prep MS C18 OBD column (5 μm, 19x50 mm) were used for the purification. A BioTek MicroFlo Select instrument was used for the addition of the 30 μM MSTI solution to the assay plate. LC-MS was performed for all compounds using a water/methanol gradient to confirm a purity of >99%.

Synthesis

4-(S-Acetylthio)benzaldehyde.12

4-(Methylthio) benzaldehyde (1.35 mL, 8.92 mmol) and tBuSNa (2 g, 17.85 mmol, 2 eq) were suspended in DMF (30 mL), and the reaction mixture was heated with stirring at 160 °C for 4 h. The resulting brown suspension was cooled, and acetyl chloride (2.2 mL, 24.6 mmol) was added. After 2 h, the resulting suspension was poured into water, and diethyl ether was added. The ethereal layer was extracted with water three times, dried, and evaporated. Next, flash chromatography was performed (SP1.0 Biotage, CH2Cl2/hexanes, 1:1); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 2.49 (s, 3H), 7.61 (m, 2H), 7.92 (m, 2H), 10.06 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 31.2, 130.6, 135.2, 136.1, 137.1, 192.1, 192.9. The yield was 40% (642 mg).

(E)-2-(4-(acetylthio)styryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium (acetyl-MSTI). (15)

4-(S-Acetylthio)benzaldehyde (0.200 g, 1.11 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL acetic anhydride, then 1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-3H-indolium iodide (0.330 g, 1.11 mmol) and sodium acetate (0.09 g, 1.11 mmol) was added. Stirring was continued at room temperature for 12 hours, and then solvent was removed by vacuum. The solid was washed with diethyl ether (20 mL), then toluene (20 ml). Drying the precipitate in vacuum afforded orange product (55%, 0.210 g); 1H NMR: (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ8.25 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, -CH=CH-), 8.20 (d, J =7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.90(d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H, -CH=CH-), 7.69–7.57 (m, 6H), 4.51 (s, 3H, -CH3), 2.49 (s, 3H, -COCH3) 1.89 (s, 6H, -CH3). 13C NMR: (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 192.44, 182.56, 153.31, 143.05, 141.47, 134.78, 129.92, 122.68, 115.39, 114.55, 99.87, 53.62, 37.56, 30.67, 26.58.; MS: (C21H22NOS+): 336.1 m/z.

(E)-2-(4-mercaptostyryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium (MSTI)

Acetyl-MSTI (20 mg, 0.05 mmol) was dissolved in 2 mL of tetrahydrofuran at 25 °C and 25% NH4OH(aq) (20 mg, 0.5 mmol) was added in one portion. After 20 min of stirring at this temperature the reaction mixture was acidified with 3 M HCl and was then extracted three times with 15 mL of dichloromethane. After evaporation of the solvent a yellow solid was obtained (10 mg, 44% yield); 1H NMR: (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 8.25 (d, J =16.20 Hz, 1H, -CH=CH-), 8.20 (d, J = 7.9, 1H), 7.90(d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H, -CH=CH-), 7.69–7.57 (m, 6H), 4.51 (s, 3H, -CH3), 1.89 (s, 6H, -CH3), MS: (C19H20NS+): 294.13 m/z; NB: 13C NMR characterization of the reduced thiol was problematic even at high concentration due to oxidation and precipitation and the longer acquisition time needed for 13C NMR.10b

MSTI assay

In the preparation of the “compound plate”, 15 μL of the 10 mM solution of small molecules in DMSO were dispensed in a 384 well polystyrene plate filling rows 1 to 18. A second 384 well polystyrene plate, which can be used as “control plate” had rows 19–24 filled with 15 μL DMSO. Acetyl-MSTI was dissolved in methanol as a 10 mM solution and added to a PBS buffered solution at pH 12 with 50% methanol in a ratio of 1:10. After stirring for 2 minutes, the solution was diluted with PBS at pH 7.4 with 2% DMSO, 0.01% NP40, and 5% methanol to form a 30 μM solution of MSTI at pH 7.4. Next, 20 μL of the 30 μM solution was dispensed in row 1–23 (black polystyrene “assay plate”). A 30 μM solution of aceyl-MSTI (positive control) was made in the same buffer and 20 μL of this solution was dispensed to the assay plate (row 24). With the Tecan liquid handling system, 100 nL from the compound plate and 100 nL from the control plate were transferred into the assay plate using the pin transfer tool. The assay plate was then centrifuged for 2 minutes at 1000 rpm, covered with the aluminum cover, and put on the plate shaker for agitation during the incubation period. After 30 minutes of incubation, the assay plate is once again centrifuged for 2 minutes at 2000 rpm to ensure a uniform liquid surface during the reading. The assay plate was then read for fluorescent intensity using the Tecan M1000 plate reader. An excitation wavelength of 510 nm and emission wavelength of 650 nm with a bandwidth of 20 nm and 10 nm, respectively, 100 flashes, 25 μs integration time, optimized gain and z-position (optimized to the 30 μM MSTI solution), were used for the quantification of the fluorescence signal. The Z′ value for the assay was then calculated using MSTI as the negative control (0% binding) and acetyl-MSTI as the positive control (100% binding).13 The percent binding of the small molecules at a concentration of 100 μM was reported as normalized response.

RESULTS

In order to detect thiol-reactive compounds, thus electrophiles, we designed a fluorescent probe that exhibits different spectroscopic properties in the nucleophilic state and as a conjugate with electrophilies. Therefore, an aromatic nucleophilic thiol functionality was connected to a conjugated π-system of a fluorophore. We chose an indolium dye and thiophenol in order to compose (E)-2-(4-mercaptostyryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium (MSTI, Figure 1, A). At a pH of 6.0 and higher, MSTI exists as an anion as shown by the unchanged absorbance signal over a pH range (Figure 2b). After the addition of an electrophile, such as 2-iodoacetamide, MSTI forms a covalent adduct (Figure 1, A). We isolated the conjugate of MSTI and 2-iodoacetamide and characterized it by 1H-NMR, MS, and spectroscopic analysis (see supporting information). Importantly, the conjugate has significantly different spectroscopic properties that allow the differentiation of MSTI and MSTI-conjugate using fluorescence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Spectroscopic properties of MSTI assay. A) Assay scheme; B) Absorbance spectra of acetyl-MSTI and MSTI; C) Fluorescence spectra of acetyl-MSTI and MSTI

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Buffer optimization for MSTI assay. A) Different buffer system; B) Different pH; C) Different ionic strength; D) Concentration of MSTI versus absorbance and fluorescence intensity.

MSTI, like all thiophenols, is oxygen sensitive and rapidly forms disulfides in non-degassed solvents. Our attempts to store MSTI for a prolonged time in the reduced form as a solid or in solution were not successful. Similar difficulties have been reported for fluorescent thiophenols.10b Nevertheless, we characterized MSTI by mass spectrometry and 1H-NMR. MSTI was synthesized from acetyl-MSTI under alkaline condition and acetyl-MSTI was in turn synthesized from 4-formylbenzyl thioacetate and 1,2,3,3-tetramethyl-3H indolium iodide (see supporting information for reaction scheme).

Acetyl-MSTI is stable as a solid and in solution and represents an excellent precursor for MSTI. Therefore, MSTI was generated in situ from acetyl-MSTI for screening purposes. A 10 mM methanol solution of acetyl-MSTI was diluted in degassed phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 50% by volume methanol solution at pH 12 and stirred for 2 minutes. After that time the solution became purple and more than 80% of acetyl-MSTI was converted into MSTI as determined by absorbance, fluorescence (Figure 1, B and C) and liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LCMS) (see supporting information).

At a concentration of 500 μM in PBS, MSTI at pH 12.0 and acetyl-MSTI at pH 7.4, showed a strong and different absorbance spectrum. After changing the pH of the MSTI solution from 12.0 to 7.4 no change of the absorbance spectra was observed. The maximal absorbance (λmax) of acetyl-MSTI was measured at 384 nm, while MSTI λmax is 526 nm (Figure 1, B). This absorbance shift is very likely responsible for the appearance of a pink color for the MSTI solution. The fluorescence emission range between 530 and 750 nm for both compounds at an excitation wavelength of 510 nm was measured for 100 μM MSTI and 200 μM acetyl-MSTI, respectively. The gain optimization function of the instrument (Tecan M1000) automatically adjusts the highest fluorescence value between 40000 and 50000 units. The λmax fluorescent emission was 562 nm for acetyl-MSTI and a broad emission peak between 550–700 nm was observed for MSTI (Figure 1, C). Because MSTI was generated in situ from acetyl-MSTI, around 20% of acetyl-MSTI remained, which was responsible for the first emission peak at 562 nm in the emission spectra of MSTI. However, a large fluorescence emission difference for MSTI and acetyl-MSTI was observed beyond 600 nm.

In order to optimize the fluorescence signal, the composition of the buffer was studied by monitoring the absorbance while varying the buffer reagent, pH, ionic strength (concentration of sodium chloride), or the concentration of MSTI (Figure 2). A 200 μM MSTI solution was used for these experiments. A similar absorbance in PBS (50 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.0) and Tris buffer (10 mM Tris base, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.0) was observed for MSTI (Figure 2, A). At different pH values (pH = 6–9) in PBS, MSTI showed only a marginal difference in absorbance with the highest values between pH 7 and 8 (Figure 2, B). The optimal NaCl concentration was 150 mM giving the highest absorbance for MSTI (Figure 2, C). Finally, we measured the absorbance at 525 nm and fluorescence at 510/650 nm for MSTI in PBS (pH 7, 150 mM NaCl) at different concentrations (Figure 2, D). Both absorbance and fluorescence intensity were linear between 0.01 and 125 μM MSTI. A relative standard deviation of <5% for the absorbance and fluorescence was observed for all concentrations used. From this study it was determined that an acceptable Z′ value13 of more than 0.6 be achieved with as little as 30 μM of MSTI in the presence of phosphate buffer (50 mM), pH 7 and 150 mM NaCl.

Many organic compounds have a limited solubility in water and are usually pre-dissolved in DMSO before addition to a biochemical or cell-based assay. Increasing amounts of DMSO can greatly enhance the solubility of small molecules, but may also influence the performance of an assay. The influence of DMSO in the presence of a subset of small molecules (Figure, 3, B) at a concentration of 100 μM in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) and MSTI (30 μM) is illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Evaluation of the MSTI assay in the presence of small molecules was performed in PBS (50 mM, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) and MSTI (30 μM) with an excitation and emission wavelength of 510 nm and 650 nm, respectively. All measurements were carried out in triplets. A) Change of fluorescence intensity in the presence of small molecules 1–7 (100 μM) and different additives; B) Structures of small molecules; C) Change of fluorescence intensity in the presence of small molecules 1–7 (100 μM) with 2% DMSO, 5% methanol, and 0.01% NP-40 by volume in PBS at different time points; D) Change of fluorescence intensity in the presence of small molecules 1–7 (50, 100 and 150 μM) with 2% DMSO, 5% methanol, and 0.01% NP-40 by volume in PBS.

Compounds 1–6 changed the fluorescence intensity of MSTI, whereas compound 7 did not. Compound 1 has been investigated as proteasome inhibitor with lower micromolar cytotoxicity.14 The mode of action of this compound has not been yet elucidated, but the formation of the conjugate of compound 1 and MSTI has been confirmed by mass spectroscopy (MS) (see supporting information). Compound 2 and 3 are from a series of 3-indolylmethanamines, which have been recently identified as the first irreversible inhibitors of the VDR–coactivator interaction.15 The mode of action of these molecules includes the formation of an electrophilic species, which is believed to allosterically inhibit the interaction between VDR and coactivator proteins. The formation of adducts of compounds 2 and 3 with MSTI have also been identified by MS (see supporting information). The electrophilic bisnitrile compound 4 was identified during the assay optimization. Compound 5 is rabeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor that is known to form disulfide bonds with cysteine residues of H+, K+-ATPases.16 Compound 6 was identified as an irreversible inhibitor of the thyroid receptor–coactivator interaction by forming an unsaturated ketone that alkylates a cysteine residue in the thyroid receptor-coactivator binding pocket.17 Finally, as a negative control, we used verapamil (compound 7).

Three different additives (methanol, DMSO and NP-40) and a combination of additives were investigated (Figure 3, A). In this study, 30 μM of MSTI and compounds 1–7 (100 μM) in PBS (50 mM, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) were incubated for 30 minutes and analyzed by fluorescence (510 nm/650 nm). As controls, MSTI (negative) and acetyl-MSTI (positive) were used and the fluorescence intensity was normalized to % MSTI signal. Interestingly, only small differences were observed for the compounds 1–7 in the presence of different buffer additives. Nevertheless, we prefer the addition of NP-40 to circumvent the possibility of compound aggregation1, 5, 18 and the addition of DMSO and methanol to enhance small molecule solubility. Furthermore, different time points were investigated to confirm the time dependency of covalent bond formation between compounds and MSTI. All six active compounds showed a stronger alkylation after 30 minutes than immediately after the addition (Figure 3, C). Compounds 2, 5, and 6 showed a further decrease of MSTI fluorescence after 1 hour. The Z′ value of the assay is changing very slowly in time reflecting the oxygen-sensitivity of MSTI. After 120 minutes the Z′ value drops below 0.6 (see supporting information). Finally, for the investigation of compound concentrations, we observed a change of the MSTI signal for all six compounds in the presence of a higher concentration of compound (100 μM instead of 50 μM) (Figure 3, D). Interestingly, no further changes of the signal were observed at the highest compound concentration used (150 μM). In addition, we also determine the dose response of 2-iodoacetamide and compounds 1, 4, and 6 (supporting information). All compounds showed a dose-dependent decrease of the MSTI signal and exhibited an IC50 value between 35–46 μM. Interestingly, the efficacy of 2-iodoacetamide and compound 4 (partial inhibition) was significantly different from compounds 1 and 6 after an incubation time of one hour.

With the optimized MSTI assay conditions: PBS (50 mM, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl), MSTI (30 μM), compound (100 μM), 5% methanol, 2% DMSO, and 0.01% NP-40; we then screened a library of small molecules. The Library of 1280 Pharmacologically Active Compounds (LOPAC1280, Sigma Aldrich) was used to determine the quality of the assay and the ability to identify compounds that are reactive towards nucleophiles mimicked by MSTI. Each LOPAC compound was measured at a concentration of 100 μM in triplicate (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Results of MSTI-LOPAC screen (1280 compounds).

The Z′ values of this screen ranged between 0.62 and 0.88 with a mean of 0.75 (see supporting information). The mean fluorescence intensity of all compounds in the presence of MSTI was 107.0% of the MSTI signal with a standard deviation (σ) of 14.2%. In order to safely distinguish between active and inactive molecules, a cutoff of σ = 1.5 from the mean was chosen as indicated with dotted lines in Figure 4. Observing a subset of random 224 LOPAC compounds more closely, the cutoff of 1.5σ represents an acceptable distinction between both populations (see supporting information). In addition, the background fluorescence was determined for each LOPAC molecule (100 μM) in the absence of MSTI at a 510 nm excitation and 650 nm emission wavelength. The vast majority of LOPAC compounds exhibited no significant fluorescence intensity in comparison with the assay media. However, eleven compounds exhibited an intrinsic fluorescence of more than 1.5σ of the mean fluorescence signal (21.3%) of MSTI (see supporting information).

The MSTI-LOPAC screen identified 9 compounds that exhibit a fluorescence signal of more than 129% of the average MSTI fluorescence intensity and 55 compounds with less than 85% of average MSTI signal. The summary of these compounds is provided as supporting information. Based on the ±1.5 σ cut-off the hit rate was 5%. The majority of the hits identified, as predicted, were electrophilic compounds (Figure 5, A). These include transition metal complexes bearing ions such as Au2+ and Pt2+, α-haloketones, quinones, NO-releasing compounds, halo-alkenes, and unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Several MSTI conjugates have been characterized by 1H-NMR and MS, such as the 2-iodoacetamide-MSTI conjugate (see supporting information). Other compounds identified are those that can undergo a conversion to an electrophilic compound such as β-aminoketones (conversion into unsaturated ketones) and 2-chloroamine derivatives (conversion into aziridines) (Figure 5, B). Interestingly, we also identified Lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor that forms disulfide bonds with cysteine residues. The same mode of action has been reported for positive control compound 5, Rabeprazole (Figure 3, B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Thiol-reactive compound classes identified by the MSTI assay

This assay also identified the compound class of apomorphines (Figure 5, C). A possible explanation could be the formation of the corresponding diketone during the storage in DMSO, which has been reported.19 The diketones, in contrast to the norapomorphines, have a red-shifted absorbance and appear with a blue-green discoloration, which might be the underlying mechanism for these false positive hits. Finally, disulfides within the LOPAC screening collection were identified as hit compounds (Figure 5, D). These compounds are likely to be reduced by MSTI followed by the formation of oxidized MSTI species with reduced fluorescence intensity.

DISCUSSION

Molecules that react with thiols such as cysteine have the potential to non-selectively modulate proteins and alter their modes of action, which in one of the hallmarks of promiscuous inhibition. The identification of such compounds is now possible with the MSTI assay. The compound MSTI bears a nucleophilic thiol group that can easily react with electrophiles to form MSTI adducts. The covalent bond formation has a dramatic influence on the fluorescent properties of MSTI, significantly reducing its fluorescence at 650 nm. The MSTI assay only requires an incubation time of 30 minutes and although optimized for a 384-well format, it is easily convertible to 1536-well format including a single centrifugation step of the assay plates (Adam Yasgar, unpublished observations). The application of a precursor, acetyl-MSTI, has the advantage that the reactive MSTI probe can be reliably produced in situ, thus circumventing any challenging storage regimes for MSTI. The MSTI assay is the first HTS assay that identifies thiol-reactive small molecules among screening library compounds. This assay also confirms the mode of action of irreversible inhibitors among LOPAC library compounds as shown for a selection of active molecules and their corresponding MSTI adducts (supporting information). The reaction between MSTI and thiol-reactive compounds is dose-dependent with a similar affinity but different efficacy, which could represent the difference between weak and strong electrophiles. The far-red detection of MSTI limits the number of molecules interfering with the assay, which was 0.85% for the LOPAC screening library. These molecules represent the largest group of false positives. The assay has an excellent reproducibility (Z′ > 0.6) and standard deviation of < 5% for each compound. We anticipate that the MSTI assay will be a helpful tool to quickly identify potential promiscuous inhibitors among screening hits and enable the fast identification of the mode of action of hit compounds in regard to their ability to react with nucleophilic protein residues.

Supplementary Material

supporting information

Acknowledgments

The work was supported in part by the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, the UWM Research Growth Initiative (RGI), National Institute of Drug Abuse R03DA031090, the UWM Research Foundation, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation, and the Molecular Libraries Initiative of the National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research (U54MH084681)

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION.

This includes the mass spectra, 1H-NMR, and fluorescence spectra of products formed between MSTI and other small molecules, quantification of the conversion of acetyl-MSTI to MSTI, dose response analysis of active compounds, time dependency of Z′, evaluation of MSTI-LOPAC screening results, and MSTI-LOPAC hit compounds with their % MSTI values.

References

  • 1.McGovern SL, Caselli E, Grigorieff N, Shoichet BK. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. J Med Chem. 2002;45(8):1712–22. doi: 10.1021/jm010533y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith GK, Barrett DG, Blackburn K, Cory M, Dallas WS, Davis R, Hassler D, McConnell R, Moyer M, Weaver K. Expression, preparation, and high-throughput screening of caspase-8: discovery of redox-based and steroid diacid inhibition. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;399(2):195–205. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2002.2757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Metz JT, Huth JR, Hajduk PJ. Enhancement of chemical rules for predicting compound reactivity towards protein thiol groups. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007;21(1–3):139–44. doi: 10.1007/s10822-007-9109-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simeonov A, Jadhav A, Thomas CJ, Wang Y, Huang R, Southall NT, Shinn P, Smith J, Austin CP, Auld DS, Inglese J. Fluorescence Spectroscopic Profiling of Compound Libraries. J Med Chem. 2008;51(8):2363–2371. doi: 10.1021/jm701301m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng BY, Shelat A, Doman TN, Guy RK, Shoichet BK. High-throughput assays for promiscuous inhibitors. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(3):146–8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lor LA, Schneck J, McNulty DE, Diaz E, Brandt M, Thrall SH, Schwartz B. A simple assay for detection of small-molecule redox activity. J Biomol Screen. 2007;12(6):881–90. doi: 10.1177/1087057107304113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Roche O, Schneider P, Zuegge J, Guba W, Kansy M, Alanine A, Bleicher K, Danel F, Gutknecht EM, Rogers-Evans M, Neidhart W, Stalder H, Dillon M, Sjogren E, Fotouhi N, Gillespie P, Goodnow R, Harris W, Jones P, Taniguchi M, Tsujii S, von der Saal W, Zimmermann G, Schneider G. Development of a virtual screening method for identification of “frequent hitters” in compound libraries. J Med Chem. 2002;45(1):137–42. doi: 10.1021/jm010934d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pearce BC, Sofia MJ, Good AC, Drexler DM, Stock DA. An empirical process for the design of high-throughput screening deck filters. J Chem Inf Model. 2006;46(3):1060–8. doi: 10.1021/ci050504m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Rishton GM. Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS. Drug Discov Today. 1997;2(9):382–384. [Google Scholar]; (d) Hann M, Hudson B, Lewell X, Lifely R, Miller L, Ramsden N. Strategic pooling of compounds for high-throughput screening. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999;39(5):897–902. doi: 10.1021/ci990423o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Baell JB, Holloway GA. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J Med Chem. 2010;53(7):2719–40. doi: 10.1021/jm901137j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Bocker A, Bonneau PR, Edwards PJ. HTS promiscuity analyses for accelerating decision making. J Biomol Screen. 2011;16(7):765–74. doi: 10.1177/1087057111407763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Epps DE, Taylor BM. A Competitive Fluorescence Assay to Measure the Reactivity of Compounds. Anal Biochem. 2001;295(1):101–106. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huth JR, Mendoza R, Olejniczak ET, Johnson RW, Cothron DA, Liu Y, Lerner CG, Chen J, Hajduk PJ. ALARM NMR: A Rapid and Robust Experimental Method To Detect Reactive False Positives in Biochemical Screens. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(1):217–224. doi: 10.1021/ja0455547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Long L, Lin W, Chen B, Gao W, Yuan L. Construction of a FRET-based ratiometric fluorescent thiol probe. Chem Commun. 2011;47(3):893–5. doi: 10.1039/c0cc03806g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reddie KG, Humphries WH, Bain CP, Payne CK, Kemp ML, Murthy N. Fluorescent coumarin thiols measure biological redox couples. Org Lett. 2012;14(3):680–3. doi: 10.1021/ol203105c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang SP, Deng WJ, Sun D, Yan M, Zheng H, Xu JG. A colorimetric and fluorescent merocyanine-based probe for biological thiols. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7(19):4017–20. doi: 10.1039/b909760k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dickinson DA, Forman HJ. Cellular glutathione and thiols metabolism. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;64:1019–1026. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gryko DT, Clausen C, Roth KM, Dontha N, Bocian DF, Kuhr WG, Lindsey JS. Synthesis of “Porphyrin-linker-Thiol” molecules with diverse linkers for studies of molecular-based information storage. J Org Chem. 2000;65(22):7345–55. doi: 10.1021/jo000487u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang JH, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4(2):67–73. doi: 10.1177/108705719900400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ge Y, Kazi A, Marsilio F, Luo Y, Jain S, Brooks W, Daniel KG, Guida WC, Sebti SM, Lawrence HR. Discovery and synthesis of hydronaphthoquinones as novel proteasome inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2012;55(5):1978–98. doi: 10.1021/jm201118h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nandhikonda P, Lynt WZ, McCallum MM, Ara T, Baranowski AM, Yuan NY, Pearson D, Bikle DD, Guy RK, Arnold LA. Discovery of the First Irreversible Small Molecule Inhibitors of the Interaction between the Vitamin D Receptor and Coactivators. J Med Chem. 2012;55(10):4640–51. doi: 10.1021/jm300460c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shin JM, Cho YM, Sachs G. Chemistry of covalent inhibition of the gastric (H+, K+)-ATPase by proton pump inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(25):7800–11. doi: 10.1021/ja049607w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Estebanez-Perpina E, Arnold LA, Jouravel N, Togashi M, Blethrow J, Mar E, Nguyen P, Phillips KJ, Baxter JD, Webb P, Guy RK, Fletterick RJ. Structural insight into the mode of action of a direct inhibitor of coregulator binding to the thyroid hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21(12):2919–28. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Arnold LA, Estebanez-Perpina E, Togashi M, Shelat A, Ocasio CA, McReynolds AC, Nguyen P, Baxter JD, Fletterick RJ, Webb P, Guy RK. A high-throughput screening method to identify small molecule inhibitors of thyroid hormone receptor coactivator binding. Sci STKE. 2006;2006(341):pl3. doi: 10.1126/stke.3412006pl3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feng BY, Shoichet BK. A Detergent-Based Assay for the Detection of Promiscuous Inhibitors. Nature Protocols. 2006;1(2):550–553. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Udyardy A, Gyulai Z, Sipos A. Extensive study of the autooxidation products of apomorphine and its pharmacologically active derivatives. J Mol Struct. 2011;1002(1–3):37–44. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supporting information

RESOURCES