Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Biology of the Cell logoLink to Molecular Biology of the Cell
. 2013 Jul 1;24(13):2134–2145. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-02-0095

Galectin-3– and phospho-caveolin-1–dependent outside-in integrin signaling mediates the EGF motogenic response in mammary cancer cells

Cecile Boscher 1, Ivan R Nabi 1,1
Editor: Asma Nusrat2
PMCID: PMC3694797  PMID: 23657817

Galectin-3 binding to N-glycans promotes EGF receptor signaling to integrin in mammary cancer cells. This leads to phospho-caveolin-1–, Src-, and ILK-dependent activation of RhoA, resulting in actin reorganization in circular dorsal ruffles, cell migration, and fibronectin remodeling.

Abstract

In murine mammary epithelial cancer cells, galectin-3 binding to β1,6-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5)–modified N-glycans restricts epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor mobility in the plasma membrane and acts synergistically with phospho-caveolin-1 to promote integrin-dependent matrix remodeling and cell migration. We show that EGF signaling to RhoA is galectin-3 and phospho-caveolin-1 dependent and promotes the formation of transient, actin-rich, circular dorsal ruffles (CDRs), cell migration, and fibronectin fibrillogenesis via Src- and integrin-linked kinase (ILK)–dependent signaling. ILK, Src, and galectin-3 also mediate EGF stimulation of caveolin-1 phosphorylation. Direct activation of integrin with Mn2+ induces galectin-3, ILK, and Src-dependent RhoA activation and caveolin-1 phosphorylation. This suggests that in response to EGF, galectin-3 enables outside-in integrin signaling stimulating phospho-caveolin-1–dependent RhoA activation, actin reorganization in CDRs, cell migration, and fibronectin remodeling. Similarly, caveolin-1/galectin-3–dependent EGF signaling induces motility, peripheral actin ruffling, and RhoA activation in MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cells, but not HeLa cells. These studies define a galectin-3/phospho-caveolin-1/RhoA signaling module that mediates integrin signaling downstream of growth factor activation, leading to actin and matrix remodeling and tumor cell migration in metastatic cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION

Stimulation of cell motility in response to motogenic factors is associated with remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and enhanced turnover of substrate adhesions, reflecting cross-talk between receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and integrin signaling pathways. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and integrins cooperate and synergize to promote cell migration (Moro et al., 1998; Li et al., 1999; Cabodi et al., 2004). EGFR is up-regulated in many cancers, including breast cancer, and is associated with a poor prognosis (Masuda et al., 2012). EGF stimulates cancer cell migration through transcriptional regulation, actin reorganization, and integrin-dependent adhesion (Rabinovitz et al., 1999; Katz et al., 2007; Sidani et al., 2007; Morello et al., 2011). For example, EGF promotes cell motility through Fyn-dependent β4-integrin phosphorylation, which decreases cell adhesion (Mariotti et al., 2001). The α2-integrin intracellular domain also participates in EGF-induced cell migration by promoting EGFR and integrin trafficking and recycling (Klekotka et al., 2001; Ning et al., 2007). EGF pretreatment decreases α5β1-integrin–dependent cell spreading in a filamin- and ROCK-dependent manner (Vial and McKeown-Longo, 2012). In vivo EGF signaling to Akt and ERK1/2 leads to β1-integrin–dependent tumor growth, similar to EGF-induced cell migration (Morello et al., 2011). All of these results support the idea that EGF promotes cell migration by regulating integrin signaling and trafficking. However, the mechanisms underlying growth factor–mediated integrin signaling are not well understood.

Plasma membrane subdomains, including lipid rafts, caveolin-dependent domains, and galectin-glycan lattices, organize the spatial distribution and regulate the activity of cytokine receptors, adhesion molecules, and proximal effectors of signaling (Lajoie et al., 2009). Galectins are galactose-binding proteins that bind and cross-link branched N-glycans on glycoproteins (Rabinovich and Toscano, 2009; Boscher et al., 2011). Of the 15 mammalian galectins, galectin-3 (Gal3) is unique in that it can oligomerize to form complexes, up to pentameric, forming a lattice (Nieminen et al., 2007). Recruitment to the lattice promotes RTK signaling as a function of both N-glycan number (NXS/T sites) and N-glycan branching, the latter generated principally by activity of the Golgi enzymes (β1,6-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V [Mgat5]; Lau et al., 2007). Lipid-based signaling domains, such as cholesterol-rich lipid rafts, and associated caveolin-1 are also important regulators of cell signaling. In cancer cells, caveolin-1 (Cav1) interacts via its scaffolding domain with a number of receptor tyrosine kinases, including EGFR, to inhibit their activity (Couet et al., 1997; Park et al., 2000). The Mgat5-dependent Gal3 lattice promotes EGF signaling by reducing receptor down-regulation and protecting EGFR from negative regulatory Cav1 scaffold domains (Partridge et al., 2004; Lajoie et al., 2007).

The galectin lattice also promotes integrin activation and endocytosis (Furtak et al., 2001; Lagana et al., 2006). Src kinase–dependent Cav1 tyrosine phosphorylation increases focal adhesion turnover and tumor cell migration in a Gal3-dependent manner (Goetz et al., 2008). Overexpression of a nonphosphorylatable Cav1 mutant (Cav1Y14F) or disruption of the lattice inhibits cell motility. In other words, phosphorylated Cav1 (pCav1) and Gal3 are synergistic with respect to activation of focal adhesions. pCav1 activates RhoA and mediates RhoA/ROCK/Src-dependent cell migration and invasion (Grande-Garcia et al., 2007; Joshi et al., 2008). Coordinated expression of Cav1 and Gal3 induces focal adhesion turnover, RhoA activation, and cell migration in thyroid cancer cells and represents a highly selective marker to distinguish differentiated thyroid cancers from benign thyroid nodules (Shankar et al., 2012).

As conditional modifiers of EGFR availability to ligand and of adhesion dynamics, galectin lattice and Cav1 domains will therefore influence actin cytoskeleton and adhesion dynamics and thereby cell migration and invasion (Lagana et al., 2006; Goetz et al., 2008; Lajoie et al., 2009; Boscher et al., 2011). The signaling mechanisms underlying the synergistic action of Gal3 and Cav1, however, remain to be determined. EGF is a motogenic factor that induces cell migration and is frequently associated with membrane ruffling activity (Harms et al., 2005). In epithelial and fibroblastic cells, EGF can induce the formation of particular actin structures defined as circular dorsal ruffles (CDRs; Orth et al., 2006; Abella et al., 2010; Azimifar et al., 2012). These dynamin-cortactin-Arp2/3–dependent actin structures contribute to actin remodeling and internalization processes promoting the migratory response (Krueger et al., 2003; Hoon et al., 2012). Here we show that EGF stimulation of CDR, RhoA activation, tumor cell migration, and matrix remodeling in breast cancer cells is mediated by Gal3- and pCav1-dependent integrin signaling.

RESULTS

Integrin and Src dependence of EGF stimulation of circular dorsal ruffles, cell migration, and RhoA activation

Addition of EGF to PyMT murine mammary epithelial cancer cells induces the formation of circular actin rings at the cell surface stained for cortactin, corresponding to growth factor–induced CDRs (Figure 1, A and B). These actin ruffles appear 2 min after EGF addition, forming a large actin ring that becomes a tight annulus at 12.5 min before collapsing. EGF-induced CDRs are inhibited by the dynamin inhibitor Dynasore and cholesterol extraction by methyl-β-cyclodextrin but not by clathrin small interfering RNA (siRNA), which prevents transferrin internalization (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure S1). The raft marker ganglioside GM1, bound by the B subunit of cholera toxin, accumulates at EGF-induced CDR (Figure 1D). EGF-induced CDR formation is therefore dynamin and raft dependent and clathrin independent.

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

Open in a new tab

EGF induces raft-, dynamin-, and ILK-dependent actin reorganization in CDR. (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN for 24 h and treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 8 min before fixation and labeling for cortactin (green) and F-actin (red). Actin reorganization in CDR is indicated by arrows. Bar, 80 μm. (B) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN (red) and treated with EGF before fixation and staining. Actin is shown in green. Y, Z (right) and X, Z (bottom) sections from a 3D confocal stack are shown. Bar, 30 μm. (C) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN and treated with 75 μM Dynasore (Dyn) for 45 min or with an equivalent amount of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) before addition of 100 ng/ml EGF for 8 min. In parallel, Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with clathrin siRNA (clathrin-heavy chain [CHC]) or treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (mβCD) 45 min before EGF treatment. After fixation and F-actin labeling, the percentage of cells with ruffles was counted in 10 fields; the mean is presented +SE. (D) Mgat5+/+ cells were incubated with the B subunit of cholera toxin (Ctb) before EGF treatment, fixation, and F-actin staining. Actin reorganization in ruffles is indicated by arrows. Bar, 50 μm. (E) Mgat5+/+ cells plated on FN substrate were treated with EGF and labeled for F-actin (red) and ILK or β1-integrin (green) as indicated. Bar, 30 μm. (F) EGF-treated Mgat5+/+ cells were stained for EGFR (green) and F-actin (red). Bar, 40 μm. (G) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN-coated substrate and transfected with control (ctr) or ILK siRNA (siILK) 48 h before EGF treatment. The mean number of cells forming CDRs in response to EGF is represented. In parallel, control (ctr) or ILK siRNA (siILK) transfected cells were plated in Transwell migration chambers, and after 5 h of EGF treatment, the mean number of migrating cells per field was calculated from 10 independent fields for each condition. ***p < 0.001, comparing with or without EGF condition; °°°p < 0.001, comparing control or treated cells both in EGF condition.

As previously described (Gu et al., 2011; Azimifar et al., 2012), focal adhesion–associated proteins, including integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and β1-integrin (Figure 1E), and paxillin (not shown) are recruited to EGF-induced CDRs. As described previously (Orth et al., 2006), EGFR is also recruited to CDRs (Figure 1F). ILK is an atypical serine/threonine kinase that interacts with the intracellular domain of β-integrins and actin and is involved in the regulation of cell–matrix adhesion (McDonald et al., 2008). We observed that siRNA against ILK significantly reduces the number of cells forming CDRs in response to EGF (Figure 1G) and also decreases EGF-induced cell migration through fibronectin (FN)-coated Boyden chambers (Figure 1F). CDR formation has been proposed to be required for the ECM-dependent chemotaxis response but not for ECM-independent oriented migration during wound healing (Suetsugu et al., 2003). EGF-induced CDR formation and cell migration therefore require signaling through ILK.

Inhibition of Src kinase (PP2), ROCK (Y27632), and PI3K (LY-294002) prevented EGF-induced CDRs and partially inhibited EGF-induced cell migration, whereas inhibition of MEK1/2 activity by U0126 did not significantly affect EGF-induced CDR formation or EGF-induced cell migration (Figure 2A). Using a rhotekin pull-down assay, we observed that EGF treatment induced the temporal activation of RhoA at 5 min, followed by down-regulation after 15 min (Figure 2B). No activation of Rac1 was observed in response to EGF in these cells. EGF-induced RhoA activation is inhibited by the Src inhibitor PP2 and by ILK siRNA (Figure 2C and Supplemental Table S1). As for EGF-induced CDR, RhoA activation was also dependent on raft integrity (Figure 2C and Supplemental Table S1). EGF signaling to RhoA in these mammary carcinoma cells is therefore Src, ILK, and raft mediated.

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

Open in a new tab

EGF induces ROCK-dependent CDR and cell migration and ILK-dependent RhoA activation. (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with 10 μM Y27632 (Y27), 10 μM PP2, 20 μM LY29003 (LY), 10 μM U0126 (U0), or with an equivalent amount of DMSO for 30 min before addition of 100 ng/ml EGF for 8 min. The percentage of cells forming CDRs is presented. In parallel, Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN-coated Transwell chambers, treated for 30 min with 10 μM Y27632 (Y27), 10 μM PP2, 20 μM LY29003 (LY), 10 μM U0126 (U0), or with an equivalent amount of DMSO, and treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 h. The mean number of migrating cells per field is presented (***p < 0.001, comparing with or without EGF condition; °°°p < 0.001, °°p < 0.005 relative to EGF-treated cells). (B) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with EGF and submitted to lysis. Cell extracts were subjected to Rhotekin-RBD or PAK1-PBD pull down. The amount of activated RhoA (RhoA-GTP) or Rac1 (Rac1-GTP) relative to the total amount of RhoA (RhoA) or Rac1 (Rac1) was found by Western blot. (C) Cells were treated for 30 min with DMSO or 10 μM PP2 (left), transfected with control (ctr) or ILK-targeting siRNA (middle), or treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (mβCD, right) before EGF treatment and Rhotekin-RBD pull down. Level of activated RhoA (RhoA-GTP) relative to total amount of RhoA (RhoA) is shown.

Gal3 and pCav1 promote EGF-induced CDR, signaling to RhoA, and cell migration

Gal3 and pCav1 act synergistically to promote focal adhesion turnover, cell migration, and RhoA activation (Goetz et al., 2008; Shankar et al., 2012). We therefore tested whether Gal3 and pCav1 are required for EGF-induced RhoA activation, CDR formation, and cell migration. Competitive disruption of Gal3 binding to cell surface glycoproteins with lactose, but not control sucrose, inhibited EGF-induced RhoA activation and reduced EGF-stimulated CDR formation and cell migration (Figure 3A). Furthermore, siRNA knockdown of Gal3 or Cav1 inhibited EGF-induced RhoA activation, CDR formation, and migration (Figure 3B). To specifically test the role of pCav1, we expressed wild-type Cav1-mRFP, a nonphosphorylatable Cav1Y14F mutant, or a phosphomimetic Cav1Y14D mutant (Joshi et al., 2008, 2012). Overexpression of Cav1Y14D induced RhoA activation in the absence of EGF but not dorsal ruffle formation, whereas Cav1Y14F prevented EGF-induced RhoA activation and CDR formation (Figure 3C). We then tested the effect of transient overexpression of Cav1Y14F and Cav1Y14D on cell migration. Although transfection efficiency was limited to ∼25% of the cell population, overexpression of Cav1Y14F significantly decreased (∼15%), whereas Cav1Y14D significantly increased both basal cell migration and EGF-induced cell migration (∼20%; Figure 3C). Our results show that the Gal3 lattice and pCav1 synergize to promote EGF-induced RhoA activation, CDR formation, and cell migration.

FIGURE 3:

FIGURE 3:

Open in a new tab

EGF-induced RhoA activation, CDR formation and cell migration are regulated by the Gal3 lattice and pCav1. After the indicated treatments, cell lysates were subjected to Rhotekin-RBD pull down to assess levels of activated RhoA (left), percentage of cells presenting CDRs (center), or cell migration in a Transwell assay (right). (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with 25 mM sucrose (Suc) or lactose (Lac) continuously for 48 h before treatment with 100 ng/ml EGF. (B) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with control (ctr) or Gal3-targeted (Gal3) or Cav1-targeted (Cav1) siRNA 48 h before EGF treatment. Cav1 and Gal3 knockdown was assessed by Western blot. (C) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with dsRed, Cav1, Cav1Y14F, or Cav1Y14D plasmids 48 h before EGF treatment. Cav1-RFP indicates the expression level of the Cav1 constructs. For all experiments, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05.

Cav1Y14D overexpression does not increase the number of cells with CDRs in the absence of EGF, but it significantly prolongs CDR expression in response to EGF; the number of Cav1Y14D-overexpressing cells with CDRs after 15 min EGF is significantly higher than nontransfected or Cav1-overexpressing cells with CDRs (Figure 4A). Cav1Y14F overexpression reduces the lifetime of EGF-induced CDRs. As previously described (Azimifar et al., 2012), we observed that EGF-induced CDR formation is dependent on FN coating (Figure 4A). In the absence of a FN coating, overexpression of Cav1 and Cav1Y14D but not Cav1Y14F stimulates CDR formation in response to EGF, defining a stimulatory role for pCav1 in CDR formation. We also observed that Cav1Y14D accumulates in EGF-induced CDRs, whereas Cav1 and Cav1Y14F are not detected (Figure 4B). Incubation with Cy3-Gal3 after fixation revealed strong accumulation of the exogenous protein in CDRs (Figure 4C). This suggests that Mgat5-modified branched N-glycans are recruited to CDRs. After addition of Cy3-Gal3 at 37°C at different times before or after EGF addition, we observed recruitment of Gal3 at cell–cell junctions as previously described (Boscher et al., 2012) but did not detect Gal3 accumulation in CDRs (Figure 4D). This suggests that, whereas N-glycans are present in CDRs, Gal3 does not stably accumulate in CDRs. Taken together, the results indicate that Gal3 and pCav1 promote EGF signaling to CDRs and cell migration.

FIGURE 4:

FIGURE 4:

Open in a new tab

The Cav1Y14D mutant promotes EGF-induced CDR formation and accumulates in CDRs. (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN-coated or uncoated coverslips, transfected with Cav1, Cav1Y14F, or Cav1Y14D mutants, treated with EGF, fixed at different times, and stained for F-actin. Left, percentage of transfected cells displaying CDRs on FN-coated coverslips over time. Right, percentage of cells with CDR on either FN-coated or uncoated coverslips before or after 7.5 min of EGF. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05. Three to eight transfected cells were counted per field for 10 different fields; n = 3. The number of untransfected cells forming CDRs was quantified as control. (B) Cav1- or Cav1Y14D-overexpressing cells (green) are shown after EGF treatment. CDRs are identified with F-actin (red, arrows), and recruitment of Cav1Y14D but not Cav1 to CDRs is observed. Bar, 40 μm. (C) To reveal the presence of Gal3 ligands in EGF-induced CDRs, Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with 100 ng/ml EGF, fixed, and incubated with Cy3-coupled Gal3 (green) for 30 min, fixed again, and stained for actin (red). Bar, 40 μm. (D) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with Cy3-coupled Gal-3 (green) and 100 ng/ml EGF together, fixed, and stained for actin (red). Gal3 was not detected in EGF-induced CDR. Bar, 40 μm.

Gal3 and pCav1 mediate EGFR activation of RhoA through integrin signaling

To specifically determine the role of Gal3 and pCav1 in integrin signaling independently of EGF, we directly activated integrins with Mn2+, known to result in dynamic actin reorganization (Chen et al., 1999; Mould, 2002; Cluzel et al., 2005). The Mn2+-treated Mgat5+/+ cells display actin reorganization in small β1-integrin– and cortactin-labeled annuli (Figure 5A). Mn2+ treatment induces RhoA activation, which is inhibited by pretreatment with the RGD peptide (Figure 5B), suggesting that Mn2+ treatment is integrin specific. Inhibition of Src with PP2 and of Gal3 binding with lactose also prevents Mn2+ activation of RhoA (Figure 5B), as does siRNA targeting Gal3, Cav1, and ILK (Figure 6C). Integrin signaling to RhoA therefore requires Gal3, Src/Cav1 signaling, and ILK.

FIGURE 5:

FIGURE 5:

Open in a new tab

EGF and Mn2+ induce Gal3- and ILK-dependent RhoA activation and Cav1 phosphorylation. (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with 0.5 μM Mn2+ for 10 min before fixation and staining for cortactin, β1-integrin, and F-actin. Mn2+ treatment induced small, circular structures (arrowheads). Bar, 100 μm. (B) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated for 48 h with 100 μg/ml RGD peptide or 25 mM lactose, or for 30 min with 10 μM PP2, before addition of 0.5 μM Mn2+ for 5 min and analysis of cell lysates for RhoA activation by Rhotekin-RBD pull down. (C) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with control (ctr) or ILK, Gal3 or Cav1-targeting siRNA 48 h before EGF treatment. RhoA activation was determined by Rhotekin-RBD pull down and levels of Gal-3, Cav1, ILK, and EGFR assessed by Western blot. (D) Mgat5+/+ cells were treated with 10 μM PP2 or Y27632 for 30 min (top) or 25 mM lactose or sucrose for 48 h (middle) or transfected with control (ctr), Gal-3, or ILK siRNA before addition of EGF or Mn2+. Cell extracts were Western blotted for Y14-phosphorylated Cav1 (pCav1), total Cav1, and (bottom) ILK and Gal-3.

FIGURE 6:

FIGURE 6:

Open in a new tab

EGF induces Cav1- and Gal3-dependent cell migration, actin remodeling, and RhoA activation in MDA-MB-231 cells. For all experiments, MDA-MB-231 or HeLa cells were transfected with control (ctr) or Gal3-targeted (Gal3) or Cav1-targeted (Cav1) siRNA 48 h before 10 ng/ml EGF treatment. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.005, or *p < 0.001. (A) MDA-MB-231 or HeLa cells were plated on FN-coated Transwell chambers and treated with EGF for 5 h. The mean number of migrating cells per field is presented. (B) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with EGF for 4 min before fixation and actin staining, revealing actin reorganization in ruffles. Cells presenting ruffles are indicated by arrows. Bar, 30 μm. (C) The percentage of MDA-MB-231 cells forming ruffles. (D) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with EGF for 5 min and cell lysates subjected to Rhotekin-RBD pull down. Western blot analysis revealed the amount of activated RhoA (RhoA-GTP) relative to the total amount of RhoA (RhoA), as well as Cav1, Gal3, and pCav1 expression levels.

Both EGF and Mn2+ induce Cav1Y14 phosphorylation (Figure 5D). Inhibition of ROCK or Src by Y27632 and PP2, respectively, prevents EGF or Mn2+ induction of Cav1 phosphorylation (Figure 5D). EGF and Mn2+ induction of Cav1 phosphorylation is therefore mediated by Src and Rho/ROCK signaling (Joshi et al., 2008). Gal3 induces Cav1 phosphorylation (Goetz et al., 2008), and treatment with lactose or Gal3 siRNA prevents EGF- and Mn2+-induced Cav1 phosphorylation (Figure 5D). ILK siRNA also prevents EGF and Mn2+ induction of Cav1 phosphorylation, demonstrating that it is integrin mediated. Taken together, our results suggest that Gal3 promotes integrin-dependent phosphorylation of pCav1 and downstream activation of RhoA.

EGF-induced migration, actin ruffling, and RhoA activation in human mammary cancer cells is Cav1 and Gal3 dependent

We previously showed that pCav1 and RhoA positively regulate each other in human mammary cancer MDA-MB-231 cells (Joshi et al., 2008). As previously reported, MDA-MB-231 cells migrate in response to EGF (Price et al., 1999), and we observed that this response requires Cav1 and Gal3 expression (Figure 6A). However, only Cav1 was required for EGF-induced migration of human epithelial carcinoma HeLa cells. MDA-MB-231 cells show strong ruffling activity in response to EGF (Figure 6B), predominantly peripheral ruffles (PRs) but also CDRs (Gu et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012). The percentage of cells forming EGF-induced ruffles was strongly decreased by Cav1 and Gal3 depletion with siRNA (Figure 6C). Similarly, EGF stimulation of active RhoA levels in MDA-MB-231 cells is Cav1 and Gal3 dependent (Figure 6D). Gal3 siRNA knockdown also prevented EGF stimulation of Cav1 phosphorylation (Figure 6D). Cav1 and Gal3 depletion also decreased cell migration, ruffling, and basal levels of RhoA activation in the absence of EGF (Figure 6, A, C, and D). Taken together, our results show that EGF triggers Cav1- and Gal3-dependent migration, ruffling, and RhoA activation in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.

EGF-induced FN fibril formation is Gal3, pCav1, ILK, and ROCK dependent

In addition to their potential role in cell migration, CDRs have been proposed to participate to cell invasion and matrix remodeling (Krueger et al., 2003; Hoon et al., 2012). Indeed the metalloprotease MMP2 has been located in CDRs, and the formation of CDRs and consequent cell migration have been shown to require the presence of extracellular matrix (Suetsugu et al., 2003). We previously showed that the Mgat5-dependent Gal3 lattice activates integrins, leading to FN remodeling (Lagana et al., 2006), and we therefore investigated whether Gal3/pCav1-dependent integrin signaling regulates EGF-dependent matrix remodeling. At 24 h after EGF addition to Mgat5+/+ cells, we observed a significantly increased number of FN fibrils (Figure 7A). Similar to EGF-induced CDR, RhoA activation, and cell migration, EGF-induced FN remodeling is reduced by ILK siRNA or PP2 treatment and prevented by ROCK inhibition but not MEK1/2 or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition (Figure 7, B and C). Moreover, siRNAs targeting Cav1 or Gal3, as well as Cav1Y14F overexpression and lactose treatment, prevent EGF-induced FN remodeling (Figure 7, D–F). Of interest, independent of EGF, Cav1Y14D overexpression stimulates FN remodeling, which is inhibited by lactose treatment, providing further evidence for Gal3-pCav1 as regulators of integrin signaling. We propose that EGF triggers Gal3- and ILK-dependent integrin signaling, leading to Src/pCav1/RhoA/ROCK-dependent CDR formation, tumor cell migration, and FN remodeling (Figure 8).

FIGURE 7:

FIGURE 7:

Open in a new tab

EGF-induced FN remodeling requires pCav1/ROCK/Src, Gal3 lattice, and ILK. (A) Mgat5+/+ cells were plated on FN-coated coverslips and treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 24 h before fixation and staining. Untreated or EGF-treated (+EGF) cells, as indicated, were labeled for FN (white) and nuclei (blue), showing EGF stimulation of FN fibril formation. Bar, 200 μm. (B) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with control (ctr) or ILK-targeting siRNA 24 h before EGF treatment. (C) Cells were pretreated for DMSO, 10 μM Y27632 (Y27), 10 μM PP2, 10 μM U0126 (U0), or 20 μM LY29300 (LY) before EGF treatment. (D) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with control (ctr) or Cav1- or Gal3-targeting siRNA 24 h before EGF treatment. (E) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected for dsRed, Cav1-RFP, or Cav1Y14F-RFP at 24 h before addition of EGF. (F) Mgat5+/+ cells were transfected with dsRed, Cav1, or Cav1Y14D as indicated and treated or not with sucrose (Sucr; 25 mM) or lactose (Lact; 25 mM) for 48 h. For B–F, cells were labeled with anti-FN and Hoechst and the density of FN fibrils/cell quantified. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

FIGURE 8:

FIGURE 8:

Open in a new tab

EGF induces Gal3- and ILK-dependent integrin signaling, activating the pCav1/RhoA positive feedback loop that drives CDR formation, cell migration, and FN remodeling. We propose that EGF triggers Gal3-dependent integrin activation, which induces Src-dependent phosphorylation of Cav1 and RhoA/ROCK signaling, which feeds back to promote Cav1 phosphorylation. This Gal3-integrin-pCav1 signaling module transduces EGF signaling to promote downstream CDR formation, cell migration, and FN remodeling.

DISCUSSION

A Gal3-integrin-pCav1 signaling module mediates the EGF motogenic response

Cell motility induced by growth factors involves complex signaling networks that are incompletely understood. Gal3 and pCav1 were shown to act in concert to promote focal adhesion turnover and cell migration (Goetz et al., 2008; Shankar et al., 2012). Furthermore, coordinate Cav1 and Gal3 expression is associated with human differentiated thyroid cancer (Shankar et al., 2012). We show here that the Gal3 lattice and pCav1 coordinately promote EGFR signaling to integrins, leading to ILK- and Src-dependent RhoA activation, CDR formation, cell migration, and FN remodeling (Figure 8). Consistently, ILK was shown to mediate EGF-induced CDR formation (Azimifar et al., 2012) and was proposed to promote RTK/integrin cross-talk, leading to cell migration through Nck1/2, PINCH, and ELMO2 (Tu et al., 1999; McDonald et al., 2008; Ho and Dagnino, 2012). ILK is shown here to be required not only for EGF-induced CDR formation and cell migration, but also for EGF-stimulated Cav1 phosphorylation, RhoA activation, and FN remodeling.

Gal3 induces integrin activation and Cav1 phosphorylation (Lagana et al., 2006; Goetz et al., 2008). The demonstration here that Gal3 is required for direct Mn2+-mediated, ILK-dependent integrin signaling leading to Cav1 phosphorylation and RhoA activation defines a synergistic role for extracellular Gal3 and intracellular pCav1 in outside-in integrin signaling. EGF and Mn2+ responses are both Gal3 and ILK dependent and prevented by Src and ROCK inhibition. Downstream Gal3-, ILK-, and pCav1-dependent integrin signaling therefore mediates EGF signaling to RhoA, CDR formation, fibronectin remodeling, and cell migration via a similar Src/ROCK-dependent pathway (Figure 8). Consistently, expression of phosphomimetic Cav1Y14D induces RhoA activation, cell migration, and FN remodeling independent of EGF, whereas a nonphosphorylatable Cav1Y14F prevents these cellular responses to EGF. Use of these Cav1 Y14 mutants further defined a role for Cav1 tyrosine phosphorylation in EGF stimulation of RhoA, CDR formation, cell migration, and FN remodeling. Based on the established role of pCav1 as an activator of RhoA signaling (Grande-Garcia et al., 2007; Joshi et al., 2008), this suggests that EGF promotes Gal3-dependent activation of integrin signaling, leading to pCav1-dependent RhoA activation, CDR formation, cell migration, and FN remodeling (Figure 8).

Gal3/pCav1 and EGF induction of actin remodeling and membrane ruffling

Ruffling activity in response to growth factors has been described in many cell types and linked to cell motility. Growth factor–induced ruffles have been characterized as either PRs or CDRs based on morphology, associated signaling, or actin-binding proteins and proposed functions (Suetsugu et al., 2003; Hoon et al., 2012). CDR formation might correspond to the reorganization of actin from stress fibers to lamellipodial type ruffles, thereby promoting the transition from a static to a motile state (Krueger et al., 2003; Sero et al., 2011; Zeng et al., 2011). CDRs are also endocytic structures; CDR collapse leads to the formation of macropinosomes that internalize EGFR and integrins and might contribute to integrin recycling to the leading edge (Orth et al., 2006; Gu et al., 2011). The absence of Gal3 in CDR may be due to its rapid endocytosis in these cellular structures: Gal3 has been reported to internalize from the apical surface and to promote raft-dependent integrin endocytosis and endosomal trafficking (Furtak et al., 2001; Delacour et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2012).

The role of Cav1 in CDR formation and cell migration may be specifically associated with its phosphorylation. Indeed, Gal3 stimulates Cav1 phosphorylation (Goetz et al., 2008). However, whereas Cav1Y14D induces RhoA activation and prolonged CDR lifetime, it is not sufficient to induce CDRs. This might be a temporal issue: CDRs form soon after growth factor stimulation, a synchronous event that would not be observed after transfection. Furthermore, direct integrin activation with Mn2+ induces Cav1 phosphorylation and RhoA activation in a lattice-dependent manner but does not induce CDRs, suggesting that Cav1 phosphorylation requires an additional signal to trigger CDR formation. In human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells, we observed strong EGF-induced ruffling activity, corresponding mostly to PRs but also to CDRs (Gu et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012). CDRs have been proposed to result from the formation of PR in non–gradient-induced cell migration (Suetsugu et al., 2003). Whereas ruffling is Rac1 dependent, overexpression of active Rac1 is not enough to induce these structures, suggesting the presence of another, unknown mechanism (Suetsugu et al., 2003). In many carcinoma cells, as observed for Mgat5+/+ and MDA-MB-231 cells, the Rho pathway is involved in ruffling activity (Nishiyama et al., 1994; O'Connor et al., 2000), and EGF-induced ruffles are dependent on Rho signaling (Chen et al., 2012). We observed that EGF-induced PRs and CDRs are both associated with migration and dependent on Cav1 and Gal3 expression. We also show a critical role of RhoA and pCav1/Src/integrin signaling downstream of EGF in ruffle formation. EGF has been reported to activate both Rac1 and RhoA (Tamas et al., 2003; Han et al., 2010; Balanis et al., 2011). Cav1 and Gal3 expression are strongly correlated in differentiated thyroid cancers, where they regulate focal adhesion signaling, RhoA activation, and cell migration (Shankar et al., 2012). In HeLa cells, EGF-induced migration appears to be Cav1 dependent but Gal3 independent, suggesting that other factors, such as Mgat5 expression, may regulate functionality of this signaling module. We propose that in tumor cells, the Mgat5-dependent Gal3 lattice enables EGF signal transduction to ILK-dependent integrin signaling that activates a pCav1/Src/RhoA positive feedback loop that drives downstream actin remodeling, cell migration, and FN remodeling (Figure 8). Coordinate Gal3 and pCav1 regulation is therefore critical for integrin-dependent transduction of the EGFR motogenic response.

EGFR, ILK, and integrin interact with Cav1 (Wary et al., 1996; Couet et al., 1997; Meyer et al., 2005), and recruitment to the lattice sequesters EGFR away from negative inhibitory Cav1 scaffolds (Lajoie et al., 2007). As observed for PDGF-induced ruffles (Berrou and Bryckaert, 2009), raft integrity is required for EGF-induced CDR and RhoA activation, and GM1 accumulates in CDRs (Figures 1 and 2). Local Gal3 and pCav1 organization of raft membrane domains may therefore contribute to EGF induction of CDRs. Indeed the presence of signaling proteins, including Src, in rafts is affected by Cav1 expression and integrity of the galectin lattice (Zheng et al., 2011; Boscher et al., 2012). Moreover, Cav1 regulates lipid order in focal adhesions (Gaus et al., 2006), and Gal3 regulates the dynamics of both N-cadherin and GM1 ganglioside in adhesion junctions (Boscher et al., 2012).

Gal3/pCav1 and FN remodeling

The signaling pathway leading to EGF-induced FN remodeling is Gal3, pCav1, ROCK, Src, and ILK dependent. This is in agreement with our previous work showing that Gal3 lattice promotes tumor cell migration, focal adhesion turnover, and FN remodeling (Lagana et al., 2006; Goetz et al., 2008) and with previous reports showing that FN assembly involves Rho-associated α5β1-integrin centripetal translocation (Zhang et al., 1997; Zhong et al., 1998; Clark et al., 2005). The signaling pathway observed for FN remodeling is similar to that observed for CDR formation and cell migration, suggesting that cell migration might be downstream of CDRs and lead to FN remodeling. Indeed, recruitment of MMP-2 in CDRs and the formation of CDRs in three-dimensional (3D) cultures in response to EGF suggest that these actin structures might participate in 3D motility and matrix invasion and remodeling (Suetsugu et al., 2003; Orth et al., 2006). The PI3K requirement for EGF-induced CDR formation and cell migration but not for FN remodeling, however, suggests that the mechanisms driving EGF-induced CDR and cell migration are similar but not identical to those involved in EGF-induced FN remodeling.

In conclusion, we describe here a novel signaling mechanism in which the motogenic EGF signal to RhoA, CDR, cell migration, and FN remodeling is transduced by Gal3- and pCav1-dependent integrin signaling. A required role for both extracellular Gal3 and intracellular pCav1 defines coordinate outside-inside control of this integrin signaling response, which plays a critical role in mediating growth factor–stimulated tumor cell migration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and antibodies

Plasmids encoding Cav1-mRFP Y14 constructs were as previously described (Goetz et al., 2008; Joshi et al., 2008). ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA targeting Cav1, Gal3, and clathrin-heavy chain, as well as nontargeting siRNA, were purchased from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). siRNA targeting ILK was kindly provided by Shoukat Dedhar (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada). Bovine plasma FN, sucrose, lactose, MnCl2, RGD peptide, fluorescein isothiocyanate–coupled cholera toxin B subunit, and methyl-β-cyclodextrin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Dynasore, U0126, PP2, LY29300, and Y27632 were purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated mouse and rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). EGF, phalloidin, and secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, 568, or 647 were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Mouse anti-RhoA (26C4), rabbit anti-Cav1 (N20), and mouse anti-Gal-3 (B2C10) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse anti-pY14Cav1 and rabbit anti-cortactin (H222) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Mouse anti-ILK (6G6.3), rat anti-mouse β1-integrin (MAB1997), and mouse anti-Rac1 (23A8) antibodies were purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA). Mouse anti-FN was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA).

Cell culture, transfection, and cell treatments

Mgat5+/+, Mgat5−/−, and Mgat5−/-Res (rescued: Mgat5−/− cells rescued with retroviral expression of Mgat5) cells were maintained in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) containing DMEM (Invitrogen) as previously described (Lagana et al., 2006). MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cells were cultured in RPMI or DMEM, respectively, containing 10% FBS. For transfection, cells were spread 24 h before on FN-coated plates or plastic plates. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) was mixed in OptiMEM (Invitrogen) with siRNA or DNA at a 1:1 ratio and added to the cells for 4 h. Experiments were performed after 48 h, and transfection efficiency was verified by Western blot or immunofluorescence. Cells were treated with 25 mM sucrose, 25 mM lactose, or 100 μg/ml RGD peptide continuously for 48 h before treatment or treated with 75 μM Dynasore, 10 μM U0126, 10 μM PP2, 10 μM LY29300, or 10 μM Y27632 for 30 min before EGF or Mn2+ treatment.

CDR and FN fibril formation assay, immunofluorescence, and image acquisition

Cells were spread on coverslips coated with a solution of 10 μg/ml FN as previously described (Lagana et al., 2006). After 4 h in complete medium, cells were transfected and switched to serum-free medium. For CDR formation, cells were treated after 48 h with EGF for 8 min before fixation in 3% paraformaldehyde (PFA). For FN fibril formation, cells were treated with EGF for 18 h before fixation. After washing, cells were permeabilized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and preparations blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA. Primary and secondary antibodies and phalloidin were incubated for 1 h in the same solution before mounting in Gelvatol. For quantification, 10 independent fields were acquired for each condition using equivalent settings with a 60× PlanApo objective of an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or an A1R-A1 confocal Nikon microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY). The percentage of cells with CDR was calculated, and statistical analyses were performed on Prism 4 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) using an unpaired t test (two tailed with a confidence interval of 95%). For FN fibril quantifications, the same threshold was applied to each image, and the FN intensity was determined relative to the number of cells in each image. The 3D reconstruction was made from confocal stacks (z = 0.1 μm step) using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Cell migration assay

We plated 50,000 Mgat5+/+ cells on FN-precoated well chamber and treated them after 2 h with chemical inhibitors for 30 min before adding 100 ng/ml EGF in the bottom chamber. After 5 h, cells in the top part of the chamber were gently removed with a swab and cells on the bottom fixed in PFA and stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution. Ten independent fields were manually counted using a 20× objective for statistical analysis.

RhoA pull-down assay and Western blot

We treated 100-mm plates containing cells at 90% confluency with EGF or Mn2+ and extracted them in Mg2+ Lysis/Wash Buffer (Millipore). Cell extracts were submitted to pull down with glutathione–agarose beads coupled with Rhotekin-RBD or PAK1-PBD, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Millipore). The total pull down and 2% of the total extract were analyzed by Western blot for RhoA or Rac1. For Western blot of tyrosine-phosphorylated Cav1, cells were extracted in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, buffer containing 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 1% Triton-X100, 1 mM NaVO3, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM NaPPi, and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and cell extracts were Western blotted with antibody to pCav1. Briefly, cell extracts were loaded on 13% acrylamide gels and proteins were transferred on polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, blocked in PBST (1% Tween) containing 5% milk, and incubated with primary antibodies in PBST overnight. Membranes were probed with HRP-coupled secondary antibodies and revealed with enhanced chemiluminescence (Millipore).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Materials
supp_24_13_2134__index.html (1KB, html)

Acknowledgments

We thank Shoukat Dedhar for providing the ILK siRNA and for helpful discussions. Scott Strugnell contributed to initial studies with MDA-MB-231 cells. This work is supported by Grant MOP-43938 from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Abbreviations used:

Cav1

caveolin-1

CDR

circular dorsal ruffle

EGF

epidermal growth factor

FN

fibronectin

Gal3

galectin-3

Mgat5

β1,6-acetyl­glucosaminyltransferase V

pCav1

Y14 phosphorylated caveolin-1

PR

peripheral ruffle

Footnotes

This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E13-02-0095) on May 8, 2013.

REFERENCES

  1. Abella JV, Vaillancourt R, Frigault MM, Ponzo MG, Zuo D, Sangwan V, Larose L, Park M. The Gab1 scaffold regulates RTK-dependent dorsal ruffle formation through the adaptor Nck. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1306–1319. doi: 10.1242/jcs.062570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azimifar SB, Bottcher RT, Zanivan S, Grashoff C, Kruger M, Legate KR, Mann M, Fassler R. Induction of membrane circular dorsal ruffles requires co-signalling of integrin-ILK-complex and EGF receptor. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:435–448. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balanis N, Yoshigi M, Wendt MK, Schiemann WP, Carlin CR. beta3 integrin-EGF receptor cross-talk activates p190RhoGAP in mouse mammary gland epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:4288–4301. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berrou E, Bryckaert M. Recruitment of protein phosphatase 2A to dorsal ruffles by platelet-derived growth factor in smooth muscle cells: dephosphorylation of Hsp27. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:836–848. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boscher C, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Glycosylation, galectins and cellular signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:383–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boscher C, Zheng YZ, Lakshminarayan R, Johannes L, Dennis JW, Foster LJ, Nabi IR. Galectin-3 protein regulates mobility of N-cadherin and GM1 ganglioside at cell-cell junctions of mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:32940–32952. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.353334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabodi S, Moro L, Bergatto E, Boeri Erba E, Di Stefano P, Turco E, Tarone G, Defilippi P. Integrin regulation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor and of EGF-dependent responses. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004;32:438–442. doi: 10.1042/BST0320438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen M, Bresnick AR, O'Connor KL. Coupling S100A4 to Rhotekin alters Rho signaling output in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2012 doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.383. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen MS, Almeida EA, Huovila AP, Takahashi Y, Shaw LM, Mercurio AM, White JM. Evidence that distinct states of the integrin alpha6beta1 interact with laminin and an ADAM. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:549–561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.3.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark K, Pankov R, Travis MA, Askari JA, Mould AP, Craig SE, Newham P, Yamada KM, Humphries MJ. A specific alpha5beta1-integrin conformation promotes directional integrin translocation and fibronectin matrix formation. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:291–300. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cluzel C, Saltel F, Lussi J, Paulhe F, Imhof BA, Wehrle-Haller B. The mechanisms and dynamics of (alpha)v(beta)3 integrin clustering in living cells. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:383–392. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200503017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Couet J, Sargiacomo M, Lisanti MP. Interaction of a receptor tyrosine kinase, EGF-R, with caveolins. Caveolin binding negatively regulates tyrosine and serine/threonine kinase activities. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:30429–30438. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Delacour D, Greb C, Koch A, Salomonsson E, Leffler H, Le Bivic A, Jacob R. Apical sorting by galectin-3-dependent glycoprotein clustering. Traffic. 2007;8:379–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furtak V, Hatcher F, Ochieng J. Galectin-3 mediates the endocytosis of beta-1 integrins by breast carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289:845–850. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao X, Liu D, Fan Y, Li X, Xue H, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Tai G. The two endocytic pathways mediated by the carbohydrate recognition domain and regulated by the collagen-like domain of galectin-3 in vascular endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaus K, Le Lay S, Balasubramanian N, Schwartz MA. Integrin-mediated adhesion regulates membrane order. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:725–734. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goetz JG, Joshi B, Lajoie P, Strugnell SS, Scudamore T, Kojic LD, Nabi IR. Concerted regulation of focal adhesion dynamics by galectin-3 and tyrosine-phosphorylated caveolin-1. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:261–1275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200709019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grande-Garcia A, Echarri A, de Rooij J, Alderson NB, Waterman-Storer CM, Valdivielso JM, del Pozo MA. Caveolin-1 regulates cell polarization and directional migration through Src kinase and Rho GTPases. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:683–694. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gu Z, Noss EH, Hsu VW, Brenner MB. Integrins traffic rapidly via circular dorsal ruffles and macropinocytosis during stimulated cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:61–70. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Han J, Li L, Hu J, Yu L, Zheng Y, Guo J, Zheng X, Yi P, Zhou Y. Epidermal growth factor stimulates human trophoblast cell migration through Rho A and Rho C activation. Endocrinology. 2010;151:1732–1742. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harms BD, Bassi GM, Horwitz AR, Lauffenburger DA. Directional persistence of EGF-induced cell migration is associated with stabilization of lamellipodial protrusions. Biophys J. 2005;88:1479–1488. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ho E, Dagnino L. Epidermal growth factor induction of front-rear polarity and migration in keratinocytes is mediated by integrin-linked kinase and ELMO2. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:492–502. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoon JL, Wong WK, Koh CG. Functions and regulation of circular dorsal ruffles. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:4246–4257. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00551-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Joshi B, Bastiani M, Strugnell SS, Boscher C, Parton RG, Nabi IR. Phosphocaveolin-1 is a mechanotransducer that induces caveola biogenesis via Egr1 transcriptional regulation. J Cell Biol. 2012;199:425–435. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Joshi B, et al. Phosphorylated caveolin-1 regulates Rho/ROCK-dependent focal adhesion dynamics and tumor cell migration and invasion. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8210–8220. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Katz M, et al. A reciprocal tensin-3-cten switch mediates EGF-driven mammary cell migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:961–969. doi: 10.1038/ncb1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klekotka PA, Santoro SA, Zutter MM. alpha 2 integrin subunit cytoplasmic domain-dependent cellular migration requires p38 MAPK. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:9503–9511. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006286200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krueger EW, Orth JD, Cao H, McNiven MA. A dynamin-cortactin-Arp2/3 complex mediates actin reorganization in growth factor-stimulated cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:1085–1096. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-08-0466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagana A, Goetz JG, Cheung P, Raz A, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Galectin binding to Mgat5-modified N-glycans regulates fibronectin matrix remodeling in tumor cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:3181–3193. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.3181-3193.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lajoie P, Goetz JG, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Lattices, rafts, and scaffolds: domain regulation of receptor signaling at the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:381–385. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lajoie P, Partridge EA, Guay G, Goetz JG, Pawling J, Lagana A, Joshi B, Dennis JW, Nabi IR. Plasma membrane domain organization regulates EGFR signaling in tumor cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:341–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lau KS, Partridge EA, Grigorian A, Silvescu CI, Reinhold VN, Demetriou M, Dennis JW. Complex N-glycan number and degree of branching cooperate to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell. 2007;129:123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li J, Lin ML, Wiepz GJ, Guadarrama AG, Bertics PJ. Integrin-mediated migration of murine B82L fibroblasts is dependent on the expression of an intact epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11209–11219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mariotti A, Kedeshian PA, Dans M, Curatola AM, Gagnoux-Palacios L, Giancotti FG. EGF-R signaling through Fyn kinase disrupts the function of integrin alpha6beta4 at hemidesmosomes: role in epithelial cell migration and carcinoma invasion. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:447–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Masuda H, Zhang D, Bartholomeusz C, Doihara H, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136:331–345. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2289-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonald PC, Fielding AB, Dedhar S. Integrin-linked kinase—essential roles in physiology and cancer biology. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:3121–3132. doi: 10.1242/jcs.017996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meyer A, van Golen CM, Boyanapalli M, Kim B, Soules ME, Feldman EL. Integrin-linked kinase complexes with caveolin-1 in human neuroblastoma cells. Biochemistry. 2005;44:932–938. doi: 10.1021/bi048619r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Morello V, Cabodi S, Sigismund S, Camacho-Leal MP, Repetto D, Volante M, Papotti M, Turco E, Defilippi P. beta1 integrin controls EGFR signaling and tumorigenic properties of lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011;30:4087–4096. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moro L, Venturino M, Bozzo C, Silengo L, Altruda F, Beguinot L, Tarone G, Defilippi P. Integrins induce activation of EGF receptor: role in MAP kinase induction and adhesion-dependent cell survival. EMBO J. 1998;17:6622–6632. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mould AP. Analyzing integrin-dependent adhesion. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2002 doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0904s15. Chapter 9, Unit 9.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nieminen J, Kuno A, Hirabayashi J, Sato S. Visualization of galectin-3 oligomerization on the surface of neutrophils and endothelial cells using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:1374–1383. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604506200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ning Y, Buranda T, Hudson LG. Activated epidermal growth factor receptor induces integrin alpha2 internalization via caveolae/raft-dependent endocytic pathway. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:6380–6387. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610915200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nishiyama T, Sasaki T, Takaishi K, Kato M, Yaku H, Araki K, Matsuura Y, Takai Y. rac p21 is involved in insulin-induced membrane ruffling and rho p21 is involved in hepatocyte growth factor- and 12-O-tetradec­anoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced membrane ruffling in KB cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:2447–2456. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.4.2447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. O'Connor KL, Nguyen BK, Mercurio AM. RhoA function in lamellae formation and migration is regulated by the alpha6beta4 integrin and cAMP metabolism. J Cell Biol. 2000;148:253–258. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Orth JD, Krueger EW, Weller SG, McNiven MA. A novel endocytic mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor sequestration and internalization. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3603–3610. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Park WY, Park JS, Cho KA, Kim DI, Ko YG, Seo JS, Park SC. Up-regulation of caveolin attenuates epidermal growth factor signaling in senescent cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:20847–20852. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M908162199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Partridge EA, Le Roy C, Di Guglielmo GM, Pawling J, Cheung P, Granovsky M, Nabi IR, Wrana JL, Dennis JW. Regulation of cytokine receptors by Golgi N-glycan processing and endocytosis. Science. 2004;306:120–124. doi: 10.1126/science.1102109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Price JT, Tiganis T, Agarwal A, Djakiew D, Thompson EW. Epidermal growth factor promotes MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell migration through a phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase and phospholipase C-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5475–5478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rabinovich GA, Toscano MA. Turning “sweet” on immunity: galectin-glycan interactions in immune tolerance and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:338–352. doi: 10.1038/nri2536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rabinovitz I, Toker A, Mercurio AM. Protein kinase C-dependent mobilization of the alpha6beta4 integrin from hemidesmosomes and its association with actin-rich cell protrusions drive the chemotactic migration of carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:1147–1160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sero JE, Thodeti CK, Mammoto A, Bakal C, Thomas S, Ingber DE. Paxillin mediates sensing of physical cues and regulates directional cell motility by controlling lamellipodia positioning. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shankar J, Wiseman SM, Meng F, Kasaian K, Strugnell S, Mofid A, Gown A, Jones SJ, Nabi IR. Coordinated expression of galectin-3 and caveolin-1 in thyroid cancer. J Pathol. 2012;228:56–66. doi: 10.1002/path.4041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sidani M, et al. Cofilin determines the migration behavior and turning frequency of metastatic cancer cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:777–791. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200707009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Suetsugu S, Yamazaki D, Kurisu S, Takenawa T. Differential roles of WAVE1 and WAVE2 in dorsal and peripheral ruffle formation for fibroblast cell migration. Dev Cell. 2003;5:595–609. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00297-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tamas P, Solti Z, Bauer P, Illes A, Sipeki S, Bauer A, Farago A, Downward J, Buday L. Mechanism of epidermal growth factor regulation of Vav2, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:5163–5171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207555200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tu Y, Li F, Goicoechea S, Wu C. The LIM-only protein PINCH directly interacts with integrin-linked kinase and is recruited to integrin-rich sites in spreading cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:2425–2434. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.3.2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vial D, McKeown-Longo PJ. EGF regulates alpha5beta1 integrin activation state in human cancer cell lines through the p90RSK-dependent phosphorylation of filamin A. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40371–40380. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.389577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wary KK, Mainiero F, Isakoff SJ, Marcantonio EE, Giancotti FG. The adaptor protein Shc couples a class of integrins to the control of cell cycle progression. Cell. 1996;87:733–743. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81392-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zeng Y, Lai T, Koh CG, LeDuc PR, Chiam KH. Investigating circular dorsal ruffles through varying substrate stiffness and mathematical modeling. Biophys J. 2011;101:2122–2130. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang Q, Magnusson MK, Mosher DF. Lysophosphatidic acid and microtubule-destabilizing agents stimulate fibronectin matrix assembly through Rho-dependent actin stress fiber formation and cell contraction. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:1415–1425. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.8.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zheng YZ, Boscher C, Inder KL, Fairbank M, Loo D, Hill MM, Nabi IR, Foster LJ. Differential impact of caveolae and caveolin-1 scaffolds on the membrane raft proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M110 007146. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.007146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhong C, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Brown J, Shaub A, Belkin AM, Burridge K. Rho-mediated contractility exposes a cryptic site in fibronectin and induces fibronectin matrix assembly. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:539–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.2.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Materials
supp_24_13_2134__index.html (1KB, html)
supp_E13-02-0095v1_CombinedSupMats.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
supp_E13-02-0095v1_mc-E13-02-0095-s01.xls (35KB, xls)

Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

RESOURCES