Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Surgery logoLink to Canadian Journal of Surgery
. 2001 Feb;44(1):39–44.

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: home visit versus telephone follow-up

Wendy M Fallis *,, Duncan Scurrah
PMCID: PMC3695182  PMID: 11220797

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the post-discharge follow-up required for patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an outpatient basis and to determine if there was a significant difference in mean concern scores and satisfaction level of patients followed up by a home visit versus a telephone call.

Design

Prospective 2-group comparison.

Setting

A 221-bed acute care community hospital in western Canada.

Patients

One hundred and forty-nine patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy and agreed to be discharged on the day of operation.

Interventions

Subjects were systematically allocated to receive either a home visit (HV, n = 72) or a telephone call (TC, n = 77) from a registered nurse on the evening of operation. During the follow-up, patient concerns were self-rated, interventions provided by the nurse were recorded, and nurses’ perceptions of the need for the home visit were reported. A 48-hour telephone survey was used to determine patient satisfaction.

Outcome measures

Patient concern scores, patient satisfaction with follow-up, readmission rates and use of emergency room services within 30 days of operation.

Results

Subjects in the TC group had a significantly lower mean concern score (p < 0.001) and were significantly more satisfied with their follow-up (p = 0.034) than those in the HV group. Nurses perceived that 75% of the home visits were not necessary. Readmission rate was less than 1% (1 HV) and use of emergency room services was 6% (3 HV, 6 TC).

Conclusions

Telephone contact is an acceptable method of follow-up for patients who have undergone outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The call should be made later in the evening on the day of operation or the next morning.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (48.8 KB).


Articles from Canadian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES