Abstract
The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is now widely used in various research fields, including toxicology. However, information about the background pathology of this species is scarce. Here, we report a case of rhabdomyosarcoma that spontaneously occurred in a common marmoset. A 44-month-old male common marmoset was euthanized due to bilateral hind limb paralysis. At necropsy, a 2×2×5-cm intramuscular mass was observed in the lower right back. Histologically, the mass was mainly composed of interlacing bundles of spindle-shaped tumor cells. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for myogenin, desmin, vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin. Ultrastructurally, the tumor cells contained bundles of myofilaments with Z-band-like structures. Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as a rhabdomyosarcoma. To our knowledge, this is the first report of spontaneous rhabdomyosarcoma that was definitely diagnosed in the common marmoset.
Keywords: Callithrix jacchus, immunohistochemistry, pathology, rhabdomyosarcoma
The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a New World primate. With the benefits of its high fertility rate and small size (250–500 grams in adulthood), the common marmoset is now widely used in various research fields, including toxicology1. However, information about the background pathology of this species is scarce2,3, and there have been only a few reports of spontaneous neoplasms, such as uterine adenocarcinoma4, small intestine carcinoma5,6,7, bronchial adenocarcinoma8 and nephroblastoma9.
Here, we report a case of rhabdomyosarcoma that spontaneously occurred in a common marmoset.
A facility-born, male common marmoset had been kept without drug administration. Procedures for animal care and housing were in compliance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. The animal was housed individually in a stainless steel cage (39 cm wide, 55 cm deep, 70 cm high) in an environmentally controlled room that provided a temperature range of 26–30°C, a relative humidity of 30-70%, fresh air at a rate of at least 10 changes/hour, and a light:dark cycle of 12:12 hours. The marmoset was fed a commercial feed, CMS-1M (CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), supplemented with honey, Vitamin C and Vitamin D. Municipal water was provided ad libitum via an automated system.
At 44 months of age, the animal abruptly showed paralysis of bilateral hind limbs and was euthanized by exsanguination via the abdominal aorta under deep pentobarbital anesthesia. At necropsy, a 2×2×5-cm intramuscular mass was observed in the lower right back (Fig. 1). The mass was widely encapsulated, but partly adhered to the lumbar vertebrae. The cut surface of the mass was soft and white (partly yellowish white). Several white nodules, below 5 mm in size, were found in the lung.
Fig. 1.
Macroscopic appearance of the mass. A 2×2×5-cm intramuscular mass can be observed in the lower right back.
For histological examination, tissue samples of the primary mass as well as various organs, including the lung containing nodules, were fixed in neutral-buffered 10% formalin (peripheral lymph nodes were not sampled). Following fixation, the tissue samples were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 3 µm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Sections of the mass were also stained by Oil red-O and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) methods. For the Oil red-O staining, frozen sections of the mass were used. For immunohistochemistry, sections of the mass were subjected to a labeled polymer method using Histofine Simple Stain Rat MAX PO (MULTI) (Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Primary antibodies used in this study are summarized in Table 1. For electron microscopic examination, small pieces of the mass fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin were refixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and embedded in Epon resin. Ultra-thin sections of the selected areas were prepared, contrasted with hafnium chloride and lead citrate, and examined using a JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Table 1. Antibodies Used in This Study.
Histologically, the mass was surrounded by the fascia with atrophic muscle fibers (Fig. 2A). The center of the mass was necrotic. The mass was mainly composed of interlacing bundles of spindle-shaped tumor cells (Fig. 2B). These tumor cells had elongated, blunt-ended nuclei and weakly basophilic, vaguely outlined cytoplasm (Fig. 2C). There were 6 to 10 mitotic figures per high-power field (400 ×). Some tumor cells had abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, resembling rhabdomyoblasts (Fig. 2C). These tumor cells were discriminated from entrapped, atrophic muscle fibers by their cell atypia and continuity to adjacent tumor cells. Many of the tumor cells had vacuolated cytoplasm, and some showed a spider web-like appearance (Fig. 2D). These vacuoles were negative for both PAS and Oil red-O staining. Also, at the periphery of the mass (Fig. 2E), nests of round, clear tumor cells separated by thin fibrous septa were seen (Fig. 2F). Tumor cells invaded the spinal canal compressing the spinal cord (Fig. 2G), and metastasis to the lung was observed (Fig. 2H). In contrast to the primary mass, the metastatic lesion in the lung was almost exclusively composed of spindle-shaped tumor cells.
Fig. 2.
Histological appearance of the mass. (A) The mass is surrounded by the fascia (arrowheads) with atrophic muscle fibers, and the center of the mass is necrotic. HE. Bar = 2 mm. (B) The mass is mainly composed of interlacing bundles of spindle-shaped tumor cells. HE. Bar = 400 µm. (C) Tumor cells have elongated, blunt-ended nuclei and weakly basophilic, vaguely outlined cytoplasm. Some tumor cells have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, resembling rhabdomyoblasts (arrow). HE. Bar = 100 µm. (D) Many of the tumor cells have vacuolated cytoplasm, and some show a spider web-like appearance. HE. Bar = 100 µm. Inset: Higher magnification. Bar = 25 µm. (E) At the periphery of the mass, a focus of clear cells can be seen. (F) Higher magnification of Fig. E. Nests of round, clear tumor cells separated by thin fibrous septa can be seen. HE. Bars = 2 mm (E) and 100 µm (F). (G) Tumor cells invade the spinal canal and compress the spinal cord. HE. Bar = 2 mm. (H) Metastasis to the lung can be seen. HE. Bar = 2 mm.
The results of the immunohistochemistry were similar between spindle-shaped tumor cells and round, clear tumor cells. Most tumor cells were positive for myogenin (Fig. 3A), desmin (Fig. 3B) and vimentin (Fig. 3C). Also, many of the tumor cells were positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) (Fig. 3D), while they were totally negative for myoglobin and cytokeratin.
Fig. 3.
Immunohistochemical findings of the mass. Most tumor cells are positive for myogenin (A), desmin (B), and vimentin (C). Also, many of the tumor cells are positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin (D). Bars= 100 µm.
Ultrastructurally, the tumor cells were characterized by distorted nuclei and distinct nucleoli (Fig. 4A). In the cytoplasm, the tumor cells contained bundles of myofilaments with Z-band-like structures (Fig. 4B). Also, some tumor cells had vacuoles in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4C). These vacuoles were filled with electron-lucent, flocculent materials, and a limiting membrane was not observed.
Fig. 4.
Ultrastructural findings of the mass. (A) Ultrastructurally, the tumor cells are characterized by distorted nuclei and distinct nucleoli. Bar = 25 µm. (B) In the cytoplasm, the tumor cells contain bundles of myofilaments with Z-band-like structures (arrow). Bar = 3.5 µm (C). Some tumor cells have vacuoles in the cytoplasm. These vacuoles are filled with electron-lucent, flocculent materials, and a limiting membrane cannot be seen. Bar = 2.5 µm.
Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as a rhabdomyosarcoma based on the above-mentioned characteristics: rhabdomyoblasts in the tumor, positive reactions for myogenin, a specific marker of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation10, and myofilaments with Z-band-like structures in the cytoplasm. In this case, the tumor cells were negative for myoglobin, another specific marker of rhabdomyosarcoma. However, it is known that myoglobin expression can be seen only in well-differentiated tumors, while undifferentiated tumors are strongly positive for vimentin and myogenin, as seen in our case11,12.
The differential diagnosis included other soft tissue sarcomas that could show partial rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, such as liposarcoma13, leiomyosarcoma14 and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (malignant triton tumor)15. These tumors were excluded because in this case, the tumor cells uniformly showed rhabdomyoblastic characteristics and there was no evidence of differentiation into other tissues. Though many of the tumor cells were positive for αSMA, a widely used marker of smooth muscle cells, it has been reported that some rhabdomyosarcomas can also express this protein11,16, and leiomyosarcomas are generally negative for myogenin.
Rhabdomyosarcoma is a malignant tumor derived from striated muscle cells or pluripotential mesenchymal stem cells11. In our case, the mass was surrounded by the fascia with atrophic muscle fiber, suggesting an intramuscular origin of this tumor. Also, many of the tumor cells were vacuolated in the cytoplasm. It is known that some rhabdomyosarcomas accumulate lipids or glycogen and show clear cell morphology12,17. However, we could not clarify the nature of those vacuoles, because they were negative for both PAS and Oil red-O staining, and ultrastructurally they were observed as vacuoles without limiting membranes.
In both humans and domestic animals, rhabdomyosarcomas are histologically classified into 3 types: embryonal, alveolar, or pleomorphic11,18. In this case, the mass was composed of two populations–bundles of spindle cells resembling embryonal-type rhabdomyosarcoma, especially the spindle cell type18,19, and nests of clear, round cells separated by thin fibrous septa resembling the alveolar type–and was most consistent with the mixed embryonal/alveolar type.
In the common marmoset, rhabdomyosarcoma has been induced by inoculation of Rous sarcoma virus20. Also, McIntosh et al. reported a spontaneous nasopharyngeal tumor that was suspected as rhabdomyosarcoma, though the diagnosis was not confirmed21. To our knowledge, however, there has been no report of spontaneous rhabdomyosarcoma that was definitely diagnosed in this species.
In this report, we described the histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characteristics of a spontaneous rhabdomyosarcoma in a common marmoset.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Yasufumi Ibuchi, Kaori Kunito, Yumi Tateishi and Izuru Mise for their excellent technical work.
Footnotes
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>.
References
- 1.Zühlke U, and Weinbauer G. The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) as a model in toxicology. Toxicol Pathol. 31(Suppl): 123–127 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.David JM, Dick EJ, Jr, and Hubbard GB. Spontaneous pathology of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) and tamarins (Saguinus oedipus, Saguinus mystax). J Med Primatol. 38: 347–359 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaspareit J, Friderichs-Gromoll S, Buse E, and Habermann G. Background pathology of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in toxicological studies. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 57: 405–410 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaspareit J, Friderichs-Gromoll S, Buse E, and Habermann G. Adenocarcinoma of the uterus in a common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Primate Report. 71: 63–66 2005 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brack M. Gastrointestinal tumors observed in nonhuman primates at the German primate center. J Med Primatol. 27: 319–324 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chalifoux LV. Adenocarcinoma of the small intestine in a common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Lab Anim Sci. 40: 210–212 1990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller AD, Kramer JA, Lin KC, Knight H, Martinot A, and Mansfield KG. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Vet Pathol. 47: 969–976 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brack M, Schwartz P, Heinrichs T, Schultz M, and Fuchs E. Tumors of the respiratory tract observed at the German Primate Center, 1978-1994. J Med Primatol. 25: 424–434 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zöller M, Matz-Rensing K, Fahrion A, and Kaup FJ. Malignant nephroblastoma in a common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vet Pathol. 45: 80–84 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cessna MH, Zhou H, Perkins SL, Tripp SR, Layfield L, Daines C, and Coffin CM. Are myogenin and myoD1 expression specific for rhabdomyosarcoma? A study of 150 cases, with emphasis on spindle cell mimics. Am J Surg Pathol. 25: 1150–1157 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cooper BJ, and Valentine BA. Tumors of muscle. In: Tumors in Domestic Animals, 4th ed. Meuten DJ (ed). Iowa State University Press, Iowa. 340–357. 2002 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, and Folpe AL. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors, 5th ed. Mosby, Missouri. 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coindre JM, Pedeutour F, and Aurias A. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Virchows Arch. 456: 167–179 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Okubo Y, Shibuya K, Namiki A, Takamura K, Kameda N, Nemoto T, Mitsuda A, Wakayama M, Shinozaki M, Hiruta N, Kitahara K, Ishiwatari T, and Yamazaki J. Leiomyosarcoma with partial rhabdomyoblastic differentiation: first case report of primary cardiac origin. BMC Cancer. 11: 76 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stasik CJ, and Tawfik O. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation (malignant triton tumor). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 130: 1878–1881 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Riedlinger WF, Kozakewich HP, and Vargas SO. Myogenic markers in the evaluation of embryonal botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 8: 427–434 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Govender D, and Chetty R. Clear cell (glycogen-rich) rhabdomyosarcoma presenting as cervical lymphadenopathy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 61: 52–54 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Flecher CDM, Unni KK, and Mertens F. World Health Organization Classification of Tumour: Pathology and Genetics, Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. IARC Press, Lyon. 2002 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Newton WA, Jr, Gehan EA, Webber BL, Marsden HB, van Unnik AJ, Hamoudi AB, Tsokos MG, Shimada H, Harms D, Schmidt D, Ninfo V, Cavazzana AO, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Parham DM, Reiman HM, Asmar L, Beltangady MS, Sachs NE, Triche TJ, and Maurer HM. Classification of rhabdomyosarcomas and related sarcomas. Pathologic aspects and proposal for a new classification–an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Cancer. 76: 1073–1085 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Levy BM, Taylor AC, Hampton S, and Thoma GW. Tumors of the marmoset produced by Rous sarcoma virus. Cancer Res. 29: 2237–2248 1969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McIntosh GH, Giesecke R, Wilson DF, and Goss AN. Spontaneous nasopharyngeal malignancies in the common marmoset. Vet Pathol. 22: 86–88 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]