Abstract
Background
The SCN5A gene encodes for the α-subunit of the cardiac sodium channel NaV1.5, which is responsible for the rapid upstroke of the cardiac action potential. Mutations in this gene may lead to multiple life-threatening disorders of cardiac rhythm or are linked to structural cardiac defects. Here, we characterized a large family with a mutation in SCN5A presenting with an atrioventricular conduction disease and absence of Brugada syndrome.
Method and Results
In a large family with a high incidence of sudden cardiac deaths, a heterozygous SCN5A mutation (p.1493delK) with an autosomal dominant inheritance has been identified. Mutation carriers were devoid of any cardiac structural changes. Typical ECG findings were an increased P-wave duration, an AV-block I° and a prolonged QRS duration with an intraventricular conduction delay and no signs for Brugada syndrome. HEK293 cells transfected with 1493delK showed strongly (5-fold) reduced Na+ currents with altered inactivation kinetics compared to wild-type channels. Immunocytochemical staining demonstrated strongly decreased expression of SCN5A 1493delK in the sarcolemma consistent with an intracellular trafficking defect and thereby a loss-of-function. In addition, SCN5A 1493delK channels that reached cell membrane showed gain-of-function aspects (slowing of the fast inactivation, reduction in the relative fraction of channels that fast inactivate, hastening of the recovery from inactivation).
Conclusion
In a large family, congregation of a heterozygous SCN5A gene mutation (p.1493delK) predisposes for conduction slowing without evidence for Brugada syndrome due to a predominantly trafficking defect that reduces Na+ current and depolarization force.
Introduction
The SCN5A gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 3 (3p21), contains 28 exons and encodes for the α-subunit of the cardiac sodium channel (NaV1.5), that has a weight of ∼220 kDa and consists of 2,016 amino acids [1], [2], [3]. The NaV1.5 α-subunit is the pore-forming component of the NaV1.5 channel and contains four homologous transmembrane domains (DI to DIV) joined by three linkers. Each of the domains consists of six transmembrane segments (S1 to S6) linked by intra- or extracellular loops [4], [5], [6]. S4 is positively charged and is involved in voltage-dependent activation of the channel, while inactivation is mediated mainly by the DIII–DIV linker [4]. NaV1.5 is responsible for the upstroke (phase 0) of the action potential of cardiac cells. Opening of the channel leads to a rapid influx of positive charged Na+ ions (INa), which will depolarize the membrane potential within tenths of a millisecond [7]. INa plays a central role in the initiation, propagation, as well as cardiac excitation of the cardiac impulse [8]. Overall, the cardiac sodium channel is a multiprotein complex in which auxiliary proteins interact with α-subunit (NaV1.5) encompassing enzymes, regulatory proteins and adaptor proteins that modulate gating properties, cellular localization, regulate intracellular transport, targeting and degradation of NaV1.5 [5], [7].
NaV1.5 channels are located in the sarcolemma of atrial and ventricular myocytes, the Purkinje fibers and to a lesser extent in the sinoatrial and atrioventricular node [6]. Mutations in SCN5A lead to various arrhythmogenic diseases, e.g. long QT syndrome (LQTS; subform LQT-3), Brugada syndrome (BrS; BrS-1), cardiac conduction disease (CCD, also known as Lev-Lenègre syndrome), but also idiopathic atrial fibrillation, sinus node dysfunction, atrial standstill, and even dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. This emphasizes the phenotypical heterogeneity of SCN5A mutations, and overlapping clinical and in-vitro phenotypes [18]. The basic cause is a change in NaV1.5 expression and biophysical properties leading to a loss-of-function or gain-of-function by various mechanisms. Interestingly, overlap syndromes have also been reported, primarily for SCN5A mutations leading to BrS [16], [19], [20], [21].
Here we investigated functional consequences of the 1493delK SCN5A mutation, which was identified in a clinically characterised large family with a high incidence of sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). The positively charged lysine residue is located in the DIII–DIV linker, close to the inactivation particle, and is expected to modulate sodium channel fast inactivation.
Methods
Ethics Statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Münster (Münster, Germany) and conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki [22]. All probands and their relatives who participated in the study gave written informed consent before genetic and clinical investigations.
Study Population
Detailed clinical data, including cardiac symptoms, device implantation, standard 12-lead ECGs, and cardiac imaging (transthoracic echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium contrast, or ventriculography) were obtained. ECG analysis was performed mainly upon conventional 12-lead ECG recordings with standard lead positions (paper speed 25 or 50 mm/s). Recordings were digitalized by scanning in a high-resolution format and were imported into a graphic program (DatInf® Measure, Germany) for accurate measurements. Duration of the PQ, QRS and QT intervals as well as RR intervals for calculating the heart rate were measured in three consecutive beats and provided as mean values. ECG and arrhythmia analyses were independently performed by two cardiologists.
Genetic Analysis
Genetic analysis was performed as previously described [23]. In brief, after isolation of genomic DNA, all 28 exons and adjacent intronic sequences of the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A) were analysed by sequencing (ABI3500, Applied Biosystems, Germany) after directed and selective PCR amplification using standard procedures. Obtained nucleotide sequences were compared with published wild-type sequences (nucleotide sequence: GenBank, NM_000335; protein sequence: Swiss-Prot, entry Q14524). Identified sequence variations were cross-checked for their occurrence in the SNP database of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP), the Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), disease specific mutation databases (http://www.fsm.it/cardmoc/; http://www.genomed.org/lovd/lqts/home.php?select_db=SCN5A) and PUBMED entries. DNA from 380 healthy, unrelated individuals was used to demonstrate absence in a control sample.
Heterologous Expression of Cardiac NaV1.5 Channels
SCN5A cDNA was cloned into the pCGI vector for bicistronic expression of NaV1.5 and green fluorescent protein, as described previously [24]. Human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of wild-type (WT) or 1493delK mutant Na+ channel α-subunit cDNA, together with 0.5 µg hβ1-subunit cDNA (kindly provided by J.R. Balser, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn) using lipofectamine (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies). Transfected HEK293 cells were cultured for 1 or 2 days, as described previously [25]. Only cells exhibiting green fluorescence were selected for electrophysiological experiments.
Electrophysiology and Data Analysis
Sodium currents were measured at room temperature (23°C) in the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments) and the following solutions (in mmol/L): bath (external) solution: NaCl 140, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 2.0, NaHCO3 4.3, Na2HPO4 1.4, glucose 11, and HEPES 16.8, pH adjusted to 7.4 (NaOH); and pipette (internal) solution: CsF 100, CsCl 40, EGTA 10, NaCl 10, MgCl2 1.2, and HEPES 10, pH adjusted to 7.3 (NaOH). Patch electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass and had a tip resistance of 2 MΩ when filled with pipette solution. Series resistance was compensated for ≥80%. For current density measurements, all cells were included. For measurements of gating properties, adequate voltage control was ascertained by the presence of a graded slope of the (in)activation curve (Boltzmann slope factors: >4.5 and >4.0 for activation and inactivation, respectively). Experiments were further excluded from analysis when peak sodium current amplitudes at −20 mV were <0.6 nA or >10 nA. Currents were filtered at 5 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz. Voltage control, data acquisition, and analysis were performed with a custom-made software (kindly provided by A.C.G. van Ginneken and J.G. Zegers). Voltage-dependence of activation and steady-state inactivation, recovery from inactivation, and development of slow inactivation were determined using voltage-clamp protocols depicted in the relevant figures. In all protocols, a holding potential of −120 mV and a cycle time of 5 s was used. Voltage-dependence of activation and inactivation curves were fitted with a Boltzmann function (y = [1+ exp{(V−V 1/2)/k}]−1), where V 1/2 is the half-maximal voltage of (in)activation, and k is the slope factor. Recovery from inactivation was assessed with a double-pulse protocol. Data were normalized to the current elicited by the first pulse (P 1) and fitted with a bi-exponential function (y = y 0+ A f{1−exp[−t/τ f]}+A s{1−exp[−t/τ s]}), where A f and A s represent the amplitudes of the fast and the slow components of recovery from inactivation, respectively, and τ f and τ s are their respective recovery time constants. I Na decay was fitted with a bi-exponential function (y = y 0+ A fexp[−t/τ f]+A sexp[−t/τ s]), where A f and A s are the amplitudes of the fast and the slow inactivating components, respectively, and τ f and τ s are their respective inactivation time constants. Development of slow inactivation was fitted with a single exponential function y = A+A 0exp−t/τ, where τ is the time constant for the development of slow inactivation, and A is the fraction of channels that enter the slow-inactivated state after a 1000 ms depolarization step.
Immunocytochemistry
Transfected HEK293 cells were grown on glass coverslips coated with 0.1% laminin. Before fixation, coverslips with cultured cells attached were rinsed in serum-free medium, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature (RT), and washed wit phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Next, cells were incubated in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min at RT. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and blocked with 2% BSA (in PBS) for 30 min at RT. Primary antibodies anti-NaV1.5 (1∶300) and anti-calnexin (1∶500) were added to each coverslip and incubated overnight at RT. After washing 3 times with PBS and blocking in 2% BSA for 30 min, cells were incubated with the secondary antibody for 90 min (both at RT). After 3 additional washings with PBS, the coverslips were embedded over glass slides using glycerol. Confocal imaging was performed using the Leica SPE confocal laser scanning microscope (scanning enlargement 40X with additional 3X digital zoom. For dual labeling experiments, dual color red and green images were recorded.
Antibodies
Anti-NaV1.5 (Alomone Laboratories, ASC-005) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide corresponding to residues 492–511 of rH1. The mouse monoclonal anti-calnexin antibody (Chemicon International, MAB3126) was used for labeling of endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Alexa conjugated goat anti- mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean ±SEM. Comparisons were made using unpaired Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney test when data were not normally distributed, and two-way ANOVA with repetitive measurements followed by a Holm–Sidak test for post-hoc analysis, where appropriate. p<0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Results
Clinical Data and Molecular Genetics
In a large family (family ID: 10021) with 182 members (Figure 1) and a high incidence of sudden cardiac death (n = 8), a genetic and clinical screening was performed in 30 patients. In 10 cases of this patient group (4 males, 6 females; mean age 56.2±16.5 years), a novel heterozygous SCN5A mutation (c.4477–4479delAAG; p.1493delK) with an autosomal dominant inheritance was identified. This mutation was previously assigned as p.1479delK [23] and later corrected into p.1493delK [26]. From 6 additional affected family members DNA for genetic analysis was not available, but they were obligate mutation carriers. At the protein level, the mutation is predicted to cause an in-frame deletion of a lysine at position 1493 of the NaV1.5 open reading frame due to a loss of the nucleotide triplet AAG at position 4477 to 4479 (Figure 2A). This amino acid residue is located in the linker between the domains DIII S6 and DIV S1 that is known to be responsible for the inactivation of the channel [27]. In addition, this mutation was not detected in 380 European control samples and neither in >12,000 alleles screened in the setting of the NHLBI Go Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server, Seattle, WA; URL: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/[accessed February 2013]). The lysine residue at position 1493 was shown to be orthologous highly conserved. Brief clinical information of the identified mutation carriers as well as the obligate mutation carriers is presented in Table 1. Overall, the 10 mutation carriers showed no signs for gross structural heart disease by transthoracic echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging or left/right ventriculography [28]. Ajmaline challenge performed in six patients proven to carry the SCN5A mutation, did not elicit a Brugada type I-ECG that is diagnostic for BrS. However, all mutation carriers showed signs of CCD in rest ECG (Figure 2B). An increased P-wave duration (122.1±11.1 ms in lead II, 119.7±15.8 ms in lead V2 and 122.1±19.8 in lead V5; normal 50–100 ms) was identified in all patients (Table 2) and an intraventricular conduction delay in 9 out of 10 patients characterized by prolonged QRS intervals (112.9±24.1 ms in lead II, 130.3±22.5 ms in lead V2 and 114.7±21.4 ms in V5) and with no signs for right or left fascicular block (except for patient (10021_47). Furthermore, 5 out of 10 mutation carriers presented with an AV-block I° (194.4±19.9 ms in lead II, 188.9±24.5 ms in lead V2, 190.8±27.7 ms in lead V5).
Table 1. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of SCN5A 1493delK Carriers.
Patient ID | Gender | Age (y) | SCN5A Mutation | Clinical Presentation | Cardiac Imaging | Device | ECG | Ajmaline Challenge |
10021_47 | m | 60 | + | asymptomatic | normal#,§,$ | ICD | increased PWD, AVB I°, CCD, RFB, LAFB | exclusion of BrS |
10021_49 | m | 30 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | – | increased PWD, AVB I°, CCD | n.p. |
10021_50 | f | 35 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | – | increased PWD, CCD | exclusion of BrS |
10021_146 | m | 51 | + | asymptomatic | normal#, mild RV-hypokinetic§,1-vessel CAD$ | ICD | increased PWD, AVB I°, CCD, ST-elevation in V1/V2 | n.p. |
10021_149 | f | 18 | + | asymptomatic | normal#,§,$ | ICD | increased PWD, AVB I°, CCD | exclusion of BrS |
10021_153 | f | 28 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | – | increased PWD | n.p. |
10021_154 | f | 57 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | ICD | increased PWD, CCD | n.p. |
10021_160 | f | 18 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | – | increased PWD, CCD | exclusion of BrS |
10021_161 | f | 20 | + | asymptomatic | normal# | – | increased PWD, CCD | exclusion of BrS |
10021_218 | m | 20 | + | asymptomatic | normal§,$ | ICD | increased PWD, AVB I°, CCD | exclusion of BrS |
10021_33 | m | 73 | (+) | non-cardiac death | n.a. | – | n.a. | n.p. |
10021_142 | f | 79 | (+) | natural death | n.a. | – | n.a. | n.p. |
10021_150 | f | 49 | (+) | SCD | n.a. | PM | n.a., sinus bradycardia reported | n.p. |
10021_158 | f | 47 | (+) | SCD | n.a. | – | increased PWD, CCD | n.p. |
10021_213 | f | 68 | (+) | non-cardiac death | n.a. | – | n.a. | n.p. |
10021_215 | m | 44 | (+) | SCD | n.a. | – | n.a. | n.p. |
ECG, electrocardiogram; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; PM, Pacemaker; m, male; f, female; y, years; +, mutation carrier or ICD implanted; (+),obligate mutation carrier; SCD, sudden cardiac death; RV, right ventricle; CAD, coronary artery disease; #, by transthoracic echocardiographic; §, by magnetic resonance imaging; $, by ventriculography; n.p., not performed; n.a., not avalible; PWD, P-wave duration; AVB I°, atrioventricular block first-degree; CCD, cardiac conduction delay; RFB, right fascicular block; LAFB, left anterior fascicular block. Propositus (10021_149) printed in italics.
Table 2. Electrocardiogram Parameters of Mutation or Obligate Mutation Carriers.
Patient ID | Gender | Lead II | Lead V2 | Lead V5 | ||||||||||||
HR [bpm] | P [ms] | PQ [ms] | QRS [ms] | QTc [ms] | HR [bpm] | P [ms] | PQ [ms] | QRS [ms] | QTc [ms] | HR [bpm] | P [ms] | PQ [ms] | QRS [ms] | QTc [ms] | ||
10021_47 | m | 54 | 120 | 222 | 166 | 416 | 55 | 134 | 232 | 148 | 395 | 55 | 153 | 244 | 158 | 410 |
10021_49 | m | 67 | 142 | 208 | 123 | 385 | 72 | 145 | 206 | 146 | 390 | 72 | 103 | 178 | 115 | 372 |
10021_50 | f | 87 | 120 | 193 | 99 | 458 | 88 | 114 | 168 | 106 | 435 | 87 | 122 | 184 | 101 | 436 |
10021_146 | m | 81 | 131 | 219 | 91 | 423 | 80 | 115 | 214 | 115 | 426 | 80 | 137 | 215 | 109 | 431 |
10021_149 | f | 76 | 131 | 203 | 124 | 434 | 74 | 132 | 193 | 151 | 444 | 71 | 143 | 222 | 129 | 427 |
10021_153 | f | 73 | 115 | 174 | 92 | 394 | 73 | 97 | 160 | 96 | 392 | 73 | 101 | 157 | 93 | 393 |
10021_154 | f | not measureable | not measureable | not measureable | ||||||||||||
10021_158 | f | 64 | 101 | 178 | 109 | 396 | 64 | 101 | 192 | 127 | 382 | 64 | 93 | 180 | 112 | 392 |
10021_160 | f | 68 | 121 | 168 | 83 | 355 | 68 | 122 | 157 | 107 | 378 | 68 | 118 | 160 | 82 | 358 |
10021_161 | f | 69 | 114 | 174 | 120 | 411 | 62 | 106 | 172 | 155 | 388 | 62 | 116 | 181 | 118 | 381 |
10021_218 | m | 50 | 127 | 205 | 124 | 384 | 51 | 132 | 194 | 151 | 382 | 51 | 137 | 188 | 130 | 373 |
Mean values ±SD | 69.0±11.2 | 122.1±11.1 | 194.4±19.9 | 112.9±24.1 | 405.5±29.3 | 68.6±11.1 | 119.7±15.8 | 188.9±24.5 | 130.3±22.5 | 401.2±24.4 | 68.4±11.1 | 122.1±19.8 | 190.8±27.7 | 114.7±21.4 | 397.2±27.5 |
HR, heart rate; P, P interval; PQ, PQ interval; QRS, QRS interval; QTc, corrected QT interval; m, male; f, female; SD, standard deviation.
In the group with the obligate mutation carriers (2 males, 4 females; mean age 60.0±15.1 years) SCD - defined as an unexpected death due to cardiac cause, without known cardiac diseases and under the age of 50 years - occurred in 3 cases. In one of these cases (10021_158, proband) an ECG was available, in which a wide P-wave (101 ms in lead II and lead V2) and an intraventricular conduction delay (QRS interval 109 ms in lead II, 127 ms in lead V2 and 112 ms in lead V5) without classical signs for right or left fascicular block was documented. However, this ECG was recorded nearly 18 years before SCD occurred and cardiac conduction slowing may have further worsened in the course of time. In summary, mutation carriers showed cardiac conduction delay but no signs for Brugada syndrome (ajmaline challenge inconspicuous, Figure 2C) or repolarisation disturbance (normal QTc intervals).
Electrophysiological Characterization of 1493delK Mutant Sodium Channels
To assess the functional consequences of the 1493delK mutation, sodium current (INa) biophysical properties were determined in HEK293 cells expressing wild-type (WT) and 1493delK mutant sodium channels. Results are summarized in Table 3. Comparison of WT and 1493delK mutant peak INa recorded during step depolarization (Figure 3A), and the corresponding average current–voltage (I–V) relationships (Figure 3C), clearly reveal smaller current magnitudes for 1493delK mutant channels. The average amplitude of the maximum peak INa was 5.6±0.8 nA (n = 14) for WT and 2.8±0.5 nA (n = 16) for 1493delK mutant channels (Figure 3C, Table 3). Inclusion of all experiments, i.e. also experiments with INa <0.6 nA and >10 nA (see Methods: data analysis) amounted to a five-fold reduction in INa at −20 mV for 1493delK mutant INa as compared to WT (Figure 3D, WT: 6.7±1.3 nA vs. 1493delK: 1.3±0.3 nA). Investigation of the voltage-dependence of activation and steady-state inactivation did not reveal significant differences between WT and 1493delK mutant sodium channels. The half-maximal voltage V1/2 of activation and inactivation was similar in both groups, with a slight increase of the slope factor k (Figure 4E, Table 3).
Table 3. Electrophysiological characteristics of WT and 1493delK mutant sodium channels in HEK293 cells.
WT | 1493delK | |
INa amplitude (nA): | (n = 16) | (n = 21) |
At −20 mV | –6.7±1.3 | –1.3±0.3* |
Activation: | (n = 14) | (n = 16) |
V1/2 (mV) | –40.7±1.1 | –39.5±1.7 |
k (mV) | 6.2±0.3 | 7.5±0.4* |
Steady-state inactivation: | (n = 13) | (n = 14) |
V1/2 (mV) | –92.5±2.4 | –94.0±2.3 |
k (mV) | –6.3±0.4 | –7.5±0.3* |
Recovery from inactivation: | (n = 10) | (n = 10) |
τ f (ms) | 8.9±1.2 | 3.8±0.4* |
τ s (ms) | 93.2±24.9 | 82.8±6.4 |
Development of slow inactivation: | (n = 9) | (n = 11) |
τ (ms) | 182.3±22.3 | 825.8±197.5* |
A (ms) | 0.37±0.04 | 0.22±0.4* |
V1/2, voltage of half-maximal (in)activation; k, slope factor of voltage- dependence of (in)activation; A, fraction of channels that enter the slow inactivated state at t = 1 s; τ, time constant for development of slow inactivation; τ f, fast time constant of recovery from inactivation; τ s, slow time constant of recovery from inactivation.
p<0.05 vs WT (Student’s t-test).
Since the DIII–DIV linker has been shown [29] to be responsible for channel fast inactivation, the deletion of a charged residue from this region is likely to affect inactivation kinetics. In Figures 4A and 3B, the time-dependent properties of the fast inactivation process are summarized. Close inspection of the 1493delK current tracings in Figure 3B suggests a slowing of inactivation, which was further supported by fitting the time course of current decay at various voltages with a bi-exponential function. The 1493delK mutant sodium channels displayed a remarkable and atypical voltage dependence of the inactivation time constants (Figure 4A-i). While fast (τ f) and slow (τ s) time constants of current inactivation of WT sodium channels are typically decreased on incremental depolarization, inactivation time constants of 1493delK mutant sodium channels were increased. Although τ f in 1493delK is smaller at −50 mV, there is a cross-over at −40 mV from where on τ f exceeds that of WT sodium channels, thus decreasing inactivation rate. The τ s of inactivation in 1493delK was similarly affected, but with a less negative cross-over voltage of −20 mV. In addition to slowing the inactivation rate, the 1493delK mutant also affected the relative contribution of the fast inactivation component to the overall time course of current decay. Figure 4A-ii shows the ratio - expressed as a quotient - of the amplitudes of the fast and the slow inactivating components (A f and A s) as a function of voltage. In case of WT sodium channels, time course of current decay is largely determined by the fast inactivating component, constituting ∼75% of total INa (Figure 4A-ii). The 1493delK mutation strongly reduced the contribution of the fast component to the inactivation time course, giving rise to a decrease in the ratio of A f/A s at 0 mV from 4.2±0.6 (WT, n = 14) to 1.3±0.1 (1493delK, n = 16). In summary, the overall effect of the 1493delK mutation on inactivation parameters is a profound slowing of the inactivation rate.
Additionally, we determined the rate of recovery from inactivation at −120 mV using a two-pulse protocol. The recovery time course of inactivation was significantly accelerated for 1493delK sodium channels as compared to WT sodium channels (Figure 4B, Table 3). This was exclusively due to a reduction in τ f value for 1493delK sodium channels (1493delK: τ f = 3.8±0.4 ms vs. WT: τ f = 8.9±1.2 ms); values of τ s were comparable (1493delK: τ s = 82.5±65.3 ms vs. WT: τ s = 93.2±24.9 ms).
On sustained depolarization, cardiac sodium channels tend to enter a ‘slow’ or ‘intermediate’ state of inactivation [30]. This conformational state is distinct from the fast inactivation state, requiring a prolonged period of hyperpolarization to recover from. Consequently, the slow inactivation process may influence channel availability at fast heart rates [24]. Investigation of the development of slow inactivation revealed that the fraction of channels (A) that slow inactivated at the end of a 1000 ms depolarization step was significantly reduced for 1493delK sodium channels (A = 0.22, calculated as 1 minus normalized INa) with respect to WT sodium channels (A = 0.37) (Figure 4C, Table 3). Besides, the 1493delK mutation was also responsible for a 4.5-fold decrease in the rate of development of slow inactivation (τ) (Figure 4C, Table 3).
Summarizing, the kinetic changes observed for the 1493delK mutant sodium channel, i.e. a reduction of both the fast and slow inactivation rate and a hastening of recovery from inactivation, will lead to a gain-of-function.
Immunocytochemistry of SCN5A-wild-type and SCN5A-1493delK
To establish whether the reduction in INa peak amplitude reflects a reduction in the number of channels in the plasma membrane or is due to the presence of a population of non-functional channels, immunocytochemical analysis was performed in HEK293 cells expressing with WT and 1493delK sodium channels. Transfected HEK293 cells were stained with antibodies against the cardiac sodium channel protein NaV1.5 and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane protein calnexin. Cells transfected with WT SCN5A showed a clearly distinguishable rim of NaV1.5 staining surrounding the intracellular calnexin staining, indicating successful trafficking of sodium channels to the cell surface (Figure 5). In contrast, cells transfected with 1493delK mutant SCN5A showed little discernable membrane labelling, but merely diffuse intracellular staining for NaV1.5, which showed a similar pattern as ER protein calnexin. Thus, these results indicate that the 1493delK mutation causes reduced peak sodium current by interfering with normal trafficking of sodium channels to the cell membrane.
Discussion
Here we report on a large family with a high rate of SCD and a SCN5A mutation (p.1493delK) that is located within the linker region between the domains DIII and DIV, which is responsible for the inactivation of the channel [27]. Mutations in SCN5A have been associated with various electrical heart diseases including LQTS [9], BrS [10], sinus node dysfunction [15], atrial fibrillation [13], [14], atrial standstill [16] and (progressive) CCD [11], [12], [23]. In general, SCN5A mutations leading to a decrease in sodium current (loss-of-function) have been associated with conduction slowing and therefore genetically linked primarily to BrS and (progressive) CCD [6]. Gain-of-function mutations in SCN5A are typically associated with LQTS. Although initially the different SCN5A mutations were linked to separate disorders, meanwhile numerous reports have shown that a single sodium channel mutation may inflict various combinations of clinical phenotypes of these disorders [31], [32], [33].
Clinical Phenotype of 1493delK Mutation Carriers
The identified SCN5A p.1493delK mutation carriers showed no signs of LQTS or BrS phenotype (even after ajmaline challenge), but clear incidence of CCD consisting of increased P-wave duration, AV-block I° and/or intraventricular conduction slowing in 12-lead rest ECG. Overall, five patients received an ICD for primary prevention and one patient a pacemaker. The pacemaker was implanted at the age of 38 years due to sick sinus syndrome and sinus arrest, 10 years later the patient died suddenly. Since the exact circumstances are unclear, ventricular arrhythmia cannot be ruled out. Also, in one (10021_154) out of the five patients with an implanted ICD, a ventricular arrhythmia occurred, which was terminated by an ICD shock. Overall gross structural changes were not seen in SCN5A mutation carriers [28]. Taking together, the identified SCN5A p.1493delK mutation leads to CCD, ventricular arrhythmias and SCD, in the absence of signs of BrS or LQTS.
Biophysical Properties and Membrane Expression of 1493delK Mutant Sodium Channels
To investigate the correlation between the clinical and genetic findings, electrophysiological studies were performed. Patch clamp analyses of HEK293 cells transfected with SCN5A 1493delK showed 5-fold reduced peak INa with altered inactivation kinetics compared to WT transfected cells. Whereas equilibrium properties of inactivation (and activation) were not affected, there was a profound reduction in fast inactivation rate, as well as a reduction in the fraction of channels that fast inactivated. The “intermediate” or “slow” inactivation process was similarly affected. Moreover, the deletion of K1493 produced a hastening of the recovery from inactivation. In theory, all these kinetic changes will lead to an increase of sodium current, and thus cannot account for the significant decrease in 1493delK current amplitude we observed.
Immunostaining experiments further identified that wild type NaV1.5 was homogenously expressed within the sarcolemma, whereas 1493delK NaV1.5 was primarily located intracellularly, displaying a similar expression pattern as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker calnexin (Figure 5). This presumes a trafficking defect comprising premature degradation of the greater part of the mutant protein by the ER quality control system, leading to reduced expression of the mutant channel in the sarcolemma.
Thus, the 1493delK mutation shows both loss-of-function, i.e. reduced sarcolemmal expression, and gain-of-function aspects, i.e. slowed inactivation kinetics. Since carriers of the 1493delK mutation present with CCD in the absence of a LQTS phenotype, it must be concluded that the mild increase in current due to slowed inactivation is not sufficient to prolong QT-intervals and that the loss-of-function properties dominate [34]. Hence, the profound reduction in 1493delK sodium channel expression results in a lower action potential upstroke velocity with consequent reduction in conduction velocity, as has also been described for other mutations linked to CCD [11], [35], [36].
Although a mutation in the cardiac sodium channel gene is highly compatible with the clinical phenotype of this family, we cannot rule out a contribution of mutations in other genes, e.g. SCN1B [37].
Comparison with other Sodium Channel Mutations Located in the DIII–DIV Linker
The 1493delK mutation is located in the loop linking domain III and IV of the sodium channel α-subunit, which mediates fast inactivation by occluding the intracellular side of the channel pore shortly following activation [27], [38]. Critical to fast inactivation is the hydrophobic IFM motif (isoleucine–phenylalanine–methionine), the inactivation particle, formed by residues 1485 through 1487. The positively charged lysine residue K1493 is located 6 residues downstream of this IFM motif and forms part of a cluster of charged residues contained within a α-helical structure. The DIII–DIV linker is rich of clusters of charged residues, which are not essential to inactivation, but may modulate deactivation and fast inactivation kinetics [39]. Over fifteen SCN5A mutations have been identified in the DIII–DIV linker (Figure 6), leading to either LQTS (e.g. p.G1481E, p.M1498T, p.1500delK, p.L1501V, p.1505–1507delKPQ, p.1507–1509delQKP) [40], [41], [42], [43] due to gain-of-function as a result of residual current [33] or to BrS (e.g. p.Q1476X, p.K1493X, p.Y1494N, p.1500delK, p.L1501V, p.G1502S, p.R1512W, p.I1521K) [23], [44], [45], [46], [47] as a result of reduced availability and/or slowing of recovery from inactivation [33] leading to loss-of-function. Of note, the 1500delK and L1501V [43], [48] mutations are associated with overlap syndromes of LQTS and BrS (L1501V), and LQTS, BrS and CCD (1500delK) respectively.
In the set of DIII–DIV linker mutations (Figure 6), two contain a deletion (or substitution) of a single positively charged residue, ditto the 1493delK. The 1500delK [48], located in proximity to the 1493delK contained in the same α-helix downstream of the IFM motive, and the R1512W [47], [49]. Comparing the functional consequences of these mutant channels with the 1493delK (this study) reveals both differences and similarities. While sodium current density was unaltered for 1500delK and R1512W, we found a profound reduction in peak 1493delK INa amplitude. Of note, a double mutation at the analogous position in the rat brain sodium channel SCN3A (KK1441/1442NN), similarly showed reduced expression [50]. Additionally, the shifts in voltage-dependence of activation and steady-state inactivation as reported for 1500delK and R1512W, were absent in 1493delK. However, the slowing of fast inactivation at voltages positive to ∼–40 mV is a common property to all 3 mutations. Enhancement of a late current component was only present in the 1500delK mutant channel, which explains the LQT phenotype in addition to BrS and CCD in carriers of this mutation.
Conclusion
The deletion mutation 1493delK in the SCN5A gene predisposes to conduction disease, ventricular arrhythmias and SCD with a phenotype of P-wave prolongation, AV-block I° and unspecific intraventricular conduction delay, without evidence for Brugada syndrome. The critical underlying mechanism is a five-fold reduction of sodium current due to a trafficking defect of mutant NaV1.5 from the ER to the sarcolemma.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants of the Fondation Leducq, Paris, France, the German Research Foundation, Bonn, Germany (DFG; SFB 656-C1) and the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Münster, Germany (IZKF; Schu01-012-11) to ES-B as well as by grants of the Innovative medicine research, Münster, Germany (IMF; ST121119) to BS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Gellens ME, George AL Jr, Chen LQ, Chahine M, Horn R, et al. (1992) Primary structure and functional expression of the human cardiac tetrodotoxin-insensitive voltage-dependent sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 554–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. George AL Jr, Varkony TA, Drabkin HA, Han J, Knops JF, et al. (1995) Assignment of the human heart tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha-subunit gene (SCN5A) to band 3p21. Cytogenet Cell Genet 68: 67–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang Q, Li Z, Shen J, Keating MT (1996) Genomic organization of the human SCN5A gene encoding the cardiac sodium channel. Genomics 34: 9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rook MB, Evers MM, Vos MA, Bierhuizen MF (2012) Biology of cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 expression. Cardiovascular Research 93: 12–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Abriel H (2010) Cardiac sodium channel Na(v)1.5 and interacting proteins: Physiology and pathophysiology. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 48: 2–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Amin AS, Asghari-Roodsari A, Tan HL (2010) Cardiac sodium channelopathies. Pflugers Arch 460: 223–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wilde AA, Brugada R (2011) Phenotypical manifestations of mutations in the genes encoding subunits of the cardiac sodium channel. Circulation Research 108: 884–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Balser JR (2001) The cardiac sodium channel: gating function and molecular pharmacology. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 33: 599–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang Q, Shen J, Splawski I, Atkinson D, Li Z, et al. (1995) SCN5A mutations associated with an inherited cardiac arrhythmia, long QT syndrome. Cell 80: 805–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chen Q, Kirsch GE, Zhang D, Brugada R, Brugada J, et al. (1998) Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature 392: 293–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Schott JJ, Alshinawi C, Kyndt F, Probst V, Hoorntje TM, et al. (1999) Cardiac conduction defects associate with mutations in SCN5A. Nature Genetics 23: 20–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Herfst LJ, Potet F, Bezzina CR, Groenewegen WA, Le Marec H, et al. (2003) Na+ channel mutation leading to loss of function and non-progressive cardiac conduction defects. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 35: 549–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Laitinen-Forsblom PJ, Makynen P, Makynen H, Yli-Mayry S, Virtanen V, et al. (2006) SCN5A mutation associated with cardiac conduction defect and atrial arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17: 480–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eckardt L, Kirchhof P, Loh P, Schulze-Bahr E, Johna R, et al. (2001) Brugada syndrome and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a novel association? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12: 680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Benson DW, Wang DW, Dyment M, Knilans TK, Fish FA, et al. (2003) Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). Journal of Clinical Investigation 112: 1019–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Takehara N, Makita N, Kawabe J, Sato N, Kawamura Y, et al. (2004) A cardiac sodium channel mutation identified in Brugada syndrome associated with atrial standstill. J Intern Med 255: 137–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. McNair WP, Ku L, Taylor MR, Fain PR, Dao D, et al. (2004) SCN5A mutation associated with dilated cardiomyopathy, conduction disorder, and arrhythmia. Circulation 110: 2163–2167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Makita N, Behr E, Shimizu W, Horie M, Sunami A, et al. (2008) The E1784K mutation in SCN5A is associated with mixed clinical phenotype of type 3 long QT syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation 118: 2219–2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Makiyama T, Akao M, Tsuji K, Doi T, Ohno S, et al. (2005) High risk for bradyarrhythmic complications in patients with Brugada syndrome caused by SCN5A gene mutations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 46: 2100–2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Makita N, Sasaki K, Groenewegen WA, Yokota T, Yokoshiki H, et al. (2005) Congenital atrial standstill associated with coinheritance of a novel SCN5A mutation and connexin 40 polymorphisms. Heart Rhythm 2: 1128–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kyndt F, Probst V, Potet F, Demolombe S, Chevallier JC, et al. (2001) Novel SCN5A mutation leading either to isolated cardiac conduction defect or Brugada syndrome in a large French family. Circulation 104: 3081–3086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. World Medical Association (2002) American Physiological Society (2002) Guiding principles for research involving animals and human beings. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R281–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schulze-Bahr E, Eckardt L, Breithardt G, Seidl K, Wichter T, et al. (2003) Sodium channel gene (SCN5A) mutations in 44 index patients with Brugada syndrome: different incidences in familial and sporadic disease. Human Mutation 21: 651–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Veldkamp MW, Viswanathan PC, Bezzina C, Baartscheer A, Wilde AA, et al. (2000) Two distinct congenital arrhythmias evoked by a multidysfunctional Na(+) channel. Circulation Research 86: E91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Veldkamp MW, Wilders R, Baartscheer A, Zegers JG, Bezzina CR, et al. (2003) Contribution of sodium channel mutations to bradycardia and sinus node dysfunction in LQT3 families. Circ Res 92: 976–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Schulze-Bahr E, Eckardt L, Breithardt G, Seidl K, Wichter T, et al. (2005) Sodium channel gene (SCN5A) mutations in 44 index patients with Brugada syndrome: different incidences in familial and sporadic disease. Human Mutation 26: 61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Vassilev PM, Scheuer T, Catterall WA (1988) Identification of an intracellular peptide segment involved in sodium channel inactivation. Science 241: 1658–1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zumhagen S, Spieker T, Rolinck J, Baba HA, Breithardt G, et al. (2009) Absence of pathognomonic or inflammatory patterns in cardiac biopsies from patients with Brugada syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2: 16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hartmann HA, Tiedeman AA, Chen SF, Brown AM, Kirsch GE (1994) Effects of III–IV linker mutations on human heart Na+ channel inactivation gating. Circulation Research 75: 114–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Benitah JP, Chen Z, Balser JR, Tomaselli GF, Marban E (1999) Molecular dynamics of the sodium channel pore vary with gating: interactions between P-segment motions and inactivation. J Neurosci 19: 1577–1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Neu A, Eiselt M, Paul M, Sauter K, Stallmeyer B, et al. (2010) A homozygous SCN5A mutation in a severe, recessive type of cardiac conduction disease. Human Mutation 31: E1609–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Makita N (2009) Phenotypic overlap of cardiac sodium channelopathies: individual-specific or mutation-specific? Circ J 73: 810–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zimmer T, Surber R (2008) SCN5A channelopathies–an update on mutations and mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 98: 120–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rivolta I, Abriel H, Tateyama M, Liu H, Memmi M, et al. (2001) Inherited Brugada and long QT-3 syndrome mutations of a single residue of the cardiac sodium channel confer distinct channel and clinical phenotypes. J Biol Chem 276: 30623–30630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Probst V, Kyndt F, Potet F, Trochu JN, Mialet G, et al. (2003) Haploinsufficiency in combination with aging causes SCN5A-linked hereditary Lenegre disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 41: 643–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tan HL, Bink-Boelkens MT, Bezzina CR, Viswanathan PC, Beaufort-Krol GC, et al. (2001) A sodium-channel mutation causes isolated cardiac conduction disease. Nature 409: 1043–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Watanabe H, Koopmann TT, Le Scouarnec S, Yang T, Ingram CR, et al. (2008) Sodium channel beta1 subunit mutations associated with Brugada syndrome and cardiac conduction disease in humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation 118: 2260–2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Vassilev P, Scheuer T, Catterall WA (1989) Inhibition of inactivation of single sodium channels by a site-directed antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 8147–8151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Patton DE, West JW, Catterall WA, Goldin AL (1992) Amino acid residues required for fast Na(+)-channel inactivation: charge neutralizations and deletions in the III–IV linker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 10905–10909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Napolitano C, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, et al. (2005) Genetic testing in the long QT syndrome: development and validation of an efficient approach to genotyping in clinical practice. JAMA 294: 2975–2980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ (2005) Sudden infant death syndrome: how significant are the cardiac channelopathies? Cardiovascular Research 67: 388–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Keller DI, Acharfi S, Delacretaz E, Benammar N, Rotter M, et al. (2003) A novel mutation in SCN5A, delQKP 1507–1509, causing long QT syndrome: role of Q1507 residue in sodium channel inactivation. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 35: 1513–1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Splawski I, Shen J, Timothy KW, Lehmann MH, Priori S, et al. (2000) Spectrum of mutations in long-QT syndrome genes. KVLQT1, HERG, SCN5A, KCNE1, and KCNE2. Circulation 102: 1178–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Alders M, Benito B, Berthet M, et al. (2010) An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm 7: 33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tian L, Zhu JF, Yang JG (2007) [Gene (SCN5A) mutation analysis of a Chinese family with Brugada syndrome]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 35: 1122–1125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Smits JP, Eckardt L, Probst V, Bezzina CR, Schott JJ, et al. (2002) Genotype-phenotype relationship in Brugada syndrome: electrocardiographic features differentiate SCN5A-related patients from non-SCN5A-related patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 40: 350–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Deschenes I, Baroudi G, Berthet M, Barde I, Chalvidan T, et al. (2000) Electrophysiological characterization of SCN5A mutations causing long QT (E1784K) and Brugada (R1512W and R1432G) syndromes. Cardiovascular Research 46: 55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Grant AO, Carboni MP, Neplioueva V, Starmer CF, Memmi M, et al. (2002) Long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and conduction system disease are linked to a single sodium channel mutation. Journal of Clinical Investigation 110: 1201–1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rook MB, Bezzina Alshinawi C, Groenewegen WA, van Gelder IC, van Ginneken AC, et al. (1999) Human SCN5A gene mutations alter cardiac sodium channel kinetics and are associated with the Brugada syndrome. Cardiovascular Research 44: 507–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Moorman JR, Kirsch GE, Brown AM, Joho RH (1990) Changes in sodium channel gating produced by point mutations in a cytoplasmic linker. Science 250: 688–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]