Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1992 Apr;12(4):1553–1560. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1553

Nuclear processing of the 3'-terminal nucleotides of pre-U1 RNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

H Yang 1, M L Moss 1, E Lund 1, J E Dahlberg 1
PMCID: PMC369597  PMID: 1549111

Abstract

U1 small nuclear RNA is synthesized as a precursor with several extra nucleotides at its 3' end. We show that in Xenopus laevis oocytes, removal of the terminal two nucleotides occurs after the RNA has transited through the cytoplasm and returned to the nucleus. The activity is controlled by an inhibitor of processing, which we call TPI, for 3'-terminal processing inhibitor. This inhibitor is sensitive to both micrococcal nuclease and trypsin treatment, indicating that it is a nucleoprotein. TPI inhibits the 3' processing of pre-U1 RNAs that have 5' ends containing m7G caps but not mature m2,2,7G caps; this finding suggests that TPI interacts directly or indirectly with the 5' end of pre-U1 RNA. The inhibition of processing by TPI, almost complete at 19 degrees C, is reversibly inactivated at slightly higher temperatures. TPI activity is solely in the soluble fraction of oocyte nuclear extracts, in contrast to the 3'-terminal processing activity, which is present in both the particulate and soluble fractions. We propose that the differential processing of the 3'-terminal nucleotides of pre-U1 RNA after its return from the cytoplasm, but not before its exit from the nucleus, may be due to the association of TPI with the m7G cap on the newly synthesized pre-U1 RNA.

Full text

PDF
1553

Images in this article

1555Image
on p.1555
1556Image
on p.1556
1556Image
on p.1556
1557Image
on p.1557
1557Image
on p.1557
1558Image
on p.1558
1558Image
on p.1558

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bringmann P., Rinke J., Appel B., Reuter R., Lührmann R. Purification of snRNPs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 with 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine-specific antibody and definition of their constituent proteins reacting with anti-Sm and anti-(U1)RNP antisera. EMBO J. 1983;2(7):1129–1135. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01557.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eliceiri G. L. Short-lived, small RNAs in the cytoplasm of HeLa cells. Cell. 1974 Sep;3(1):11–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feldherr C. M., Richmond P. A. Manual enucleation of Xenopus oocytes. Methods Cell Biol. 1978;17:75–79. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer U., Lührmann R. An essential signaling role for the m3G cap in the transport of U1 snRNP to the nucleus. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):786–790. doi: 10.1126/science.2143847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forbes D. J., Kornberg T. B., Kirschner M. W. Small nuclear RNA transcription and ribonucleoprotein assembly in early Xenopus development. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):62–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford C. C., Gurdon J. B. A method for enucleating oocytes of Xenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977 Feb;37(1):203–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gurdon J. B., Wickens M. P. The use of Xenopus oocytes for the expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:370–386. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamm J., Darzynkiewicz E., Tahara S. M., Mattaj I. W. The trimethylguanosine cap structure of U1 snRNA is a component of a bipartite nuclear targeting signal. Cell. 1990 Aug 10;62(3):569–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamm J., Kazmaier M., Mattaj I. W. In vitro assembly of U1 snRNPs. EMBO J. 1987 Nov;6(11):3479–3485. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02672.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamm J., Mattaj I. W. Monomethylated cap structures facilitate RNA export from the nucleus. Cell. 1990 Oct 5;63(1):109–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90292-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kazmaier M., Tebb G., Mattaj I. W. Functional characterization of X. laevis U5 snRNA genes. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):3071–3078. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02614.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krol A., Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. The two embryonic U1 RNA genes of Xenopus laevis have both common and gene-specific transcription signals. EMBO J. 1985 Jun;4(6):1529–1535. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03813.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lerner E. A., Lerner M. R., Janeway C. A., Jr, Steitz J. A. Monoclonal antibodies to nucleic acid-containing cellular constituents: probes for molecular biology and autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2737–2741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lund E., Bostock C. J., Dahlberg J. E. The transcription of Xenopus laevis embryonic U1 snRNA genes changes when oocytes mature into eggs. Genes Dev. 1987 Mar;1(1):47–56. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. In vitro synthesis of vertebrate U1 snRNA. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):287–292. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03375.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lund E., Paine P. L. Nonaqueous isolation of transcriptionally active nuclei from Xenopus oocytes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;181:36–43. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)81110-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Madore S. J., Wieben E. D., Pederson T. Intracellular site of U1 small nuclear RNA processing and ribonucleoprotein assembly. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):188–192. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mattaj I. W. Cap trimethylation of U snRNA is cytoplasmic and dependent on U snRNP protein binding. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):905–911. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mattaj I. W., De Robertis E. M. Nuclear segregation of U2 snRNA requires binding of specific snRNP proteins. Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90314-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mattaj I. W., Zeller R. Xenopus laevis U2 snRNA genes: tandemly repeated transcription units sharing 5' and 3' flanking homology with other RNA polymerase II transcribed genes. EMBO J. 1983;2(11):1883–1891. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01675.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neuman de Vegvar H. E., Dahlberg J. E. Nucleocytoplasmic transport and processing of small nuclear RNA precursors. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;10(7):3365–3375. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.7.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Patton J. R., Patterson R. J., Pederson T. Reconstitution of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;7(11):4030–4037. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.11.4030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vankan P., McGuigan C., Mattaj I. W. Domains of U4 and U6 snRNAs required for snRNP assembly and splicing complementation in Xenopus oocytes. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3397–3404. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07541.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeller R., Nyffenegger T., De Robertis E. M. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of snRNPs and stockpiled snRNA-binding proteins during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1983 Feb;32(2):425–434. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zieve G. W., Sauterer R. A. Cell biology of the snRNP particles. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1990;25(1):1–46. doi: 10.3109/10409239009090604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES