Abstract
SAS-6 is required for centriole biogenesis in diverse eukaryotes. Here, we describe a novel family of SAS-6-like (SAS6L) proteins that share an N-terminal domain with SAS-6 but lack coiled-coil tails. SAS6L proteins are found in a subset of eukaryotes that contain SAS-6, including diverse protozoa and green algae. In the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, SAS-6 localizes to the centriole but SAS6L is found above the conoid, an enigmatic tubulin-containing structure found at the apex of a subset of alveolate organisms. Loss of SAS6L causes reduced fitness in Toxoplasma. The Trypanosoma brucei homolog of SAS6L localizes to the basal-plate region, the site in the axoneme where the central-pair microtubules are nucleated. When endogenous SAS6L is overexpressed in Toxoplasma tachyzoites or Trypanosoma trypomastigotes, it forms prominent filaments that extend through the cell cytoplasm, indicating that it retains a capacity to form higher-order structures despite lacking a coiled-coil domain. We conclude that although SAS6L proteins share a conserved domain with SAS-6, they are a functionally distinct family that predates the last common ancestor of eukaryotes. Moreover, the distinct localization of the SAS6L protein in Trypanosoma and Toxoplasma adds weight to the hypothesis that the conoid complex evolved from flagellar components.
INTRODUCTION
Centrioles and basal bodies are microtubule-based structures found in many eukaryotic lineages, including animals, lower plants, and diverse unicellular organisms (1–3). Basal bodies are distinguished from centrioles by association with a flagellar axoneme that is templated from an extension to the centriole known as a transition zone (1, 4). The widespread occurrence of centrioles and basal bodies shows that they have an ancient origin in eukaryotes (5–8), but lineages such as flowering plants and most fungi have lost the ability to build these structures. Centrioles and basal bodies typically contain nine triplet microtubules organized with radial symmetry, although they can rarely be built of nine doublet or singlet microtubules (e.g., those in Drosophila embryos and Caenorhabditis elegans testes, respectively) or have likely 6-fold symmetry (9, 10). In spite of their presence at spindle poles, centrioles are dispensable for bipolar spindle formation in several lineages (11–15). However, all species that build centrioles/basal bodies have flagella at some stage of their life cycle; this observation likely underlies the true evolutionary imperative of these structures (2, 3).
Many protozoan organisms, including apicomplexan and kinetoplastid parasites, use spatially separated and morphologically distinct microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) to organize individual microtubule populations (16). Kinetoplastid parasites of the genera Trypanosoma and Leishmania cause human infectious diseases, including African sleeping sickness, Chagas disease, and kala azar (17). The shape of these organisms is maintained by an array of ∼100 densely packed corset microtubules that underlie the plasma membrane (18). The single flagellum is nucleated by a membrane-docked basal body that is distant from the nucleus (18–22). Flagella are not disassembled during division, and in replicating cells, basal bodies do not contribute to the organization of the poles of the intranuclear spindle (23). Apicomplexan parasites also cause a variety of medically significant diseases, including malaria, toxoplasmosis, and cryptosporidiosis (17). Apicomplexans typically have a complex life cycle that involves both asexual and sexual replication, and they alter microtubule architecture between the sexual and asexual life cycle stages. Microgamete motility is required for fertilization of macrogametes and is powered by flagella that originate from apical basal bodies (24). Asexual stages lack flagella and use a characteristic actin-and-myosin-based gliding motility to invade host cells (25, 26). These asexual forms (e.g., merozoites, tachyzoites) have two microtubule populations; spindle microtubules coordinate chromosome segregation during mitosis, and subpellicular microtubules subtend the pellicle to impose an elongated cell shape and cell polarity (27–29). Each microtubule population is associated with a distinct MTOC; subpellicular microtubules radiate from the apical polar ring (APR), an MTOC unique to apicomplexan organisms (28, 30, 31), whereas spindle microtubules originate near a specialized region of the nuclear envelope termed the centrocone (32–35).
Toxoplasma gondii is a member of the Coccidia—a subclass of apicomplexan parasites that build two tubulin-based structures in addition to the spindle and subpellicular microtubules, i.e., the conoid and centrioles. The conoid is an apical organelle constructed of comma-shaped tubulin sheets that spiral to form a cone-shaped structure (36–38). Two preconoidal rings surmount the conoid, and when extended, the conoid and preconoidal ring complex reside above the APR (28, 39). The conoid and preconoidal rings can also retract through the APR to be surrounded by the subpellicular microtubules. The conoid is permanently retracted in intracellular parasites, but extracellular tachyzoites extend and retract this structure, a probing behavior that is believed to facilitate host cell invasion (36–38). Two short, closely apposed microtubules are located at the center of the conoid. In contrast to the apical conoid, Toxoplasma centrioles are found in the cytoplasm proximal to the nucleus and duplicated centrioles are found at the spindle poles in the region of the centrocone structures. Coccidian centrioles are composed of nine singlet microtubules and a central tubule and are organized in a parallel rather than an orthogonal configuration (27, 33, 40).
SAS-6 is required for centriole biogenesis in eukaryotes ranging from protozoa to vertebrates (41–44). Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutants deficient in SAS-6 (bld12) produce basal bodies with variable numbers of triplet blades (45). Studies of nematodes and Drosophila indicate that SAS-6 is needed to form the “cartwheel hub” in nascent centrioles (45–49). The structural properties of SAS-6 elegantly dovetail with its ability to template a centriole (50, 51). SAS-6 assembles into homodimers that contain a globular head domain at the N terminus and an extended coiled-coil rod. Remarkably, SAS-6 homodimers can self-assemble into a structure with a central hub and nine rods, akin to the cartwheel observed in structural studies of centrioles. In this paper, we describe for the first time the properties of a family of SAS-6-like proteins that are related to SAS-6 but structurally distinct. We investigate the function of SAS-6-like proteins in two distantly related protozoa and discuss their evolutionary relationship to conventional SAS-6.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Culture of parasites.
Toxoplasma lines, including the previously described RNG1-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) line (31, 52), were grown in confluent monolayers of human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells as previously described (53). Trypanosoma brucei procyclic forms were cultured at 28°C in SDM-79 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (54).
Generation of fusion protein lines.
To generate in-frame C-terminal chimeras with proteins of interest, regions of TGGT1_040920 (TgSAS-6), TGGT1_059860 (TgSAS6L), Tb927.10.7920 (TbSAS6L), and Tb11.02.5550 (TbWDR16) were amplified and cloned into LIC (52), pLew-MH-TAP-eYFP (55), and pEnT6P-Y (56) vectors by standard methods. TgSAS-6 and TgSAS6L constructs in the pYFP.LIC.DHFR vector were transfected into ku80-null Toxoplasma parasites as previously described, and stable lines were isolated by selection in 1 μM pyrimethamine and single cell cloned (52). The coding sequence of TgSAS6L was validated by amplification of cDNA encoding the complete open reading frame with primers described in Table 1. A pre-existing GRASP55-YFP construct (57) was modified to replace the GRASP55 coding sequence with SAS6L to drive the expression of TgSAS6L-YFP from the α1-tubulin promoter, and stable lines were isolated by selection for chloramphenicol resistance. Linearized plasmid DNA was used to transfect exponentially growing cultures of procyclic-form T. brucei by electroporation (three 100-μs pulses of 4.25 kV/cm). Transfected cells were selected by the addition of 1 μg/ml puromycin (pEnT6P-TbSAS6L1-Y) or 10 μg/ml blasticidin (pEnT6B-WDR16-mCherry). Inducible overexpression of TbSAS6L was achieved by cloning TbSAS6L into the pLew-MH-TAP-eYFP vector with primers described in Table 1. Transfectants were selected in 5 μg/ml phleomycin, and overexpression of TbSAS6L1-YFP was induced by the addition of 1 μg/ml doxycycline to the culture medium.
Table 1.
Primer | Sequence |
---|---|
TbSAS6L CDS pEnT6P 5′ | GTTGCGGCCGCAAAGAACCCCAACGCTTTTT |
TbSAS6L CDS pEnT6P 3′ | GTCTACTAGTTCGCGTTTTTCCAAGTGTG |
TbSAS6L UTR pEnT6P 5′ | GTTAAGCTTGAGTGCAAATTCTTCAGTGCG |
TbSAS6L UTR pEnT6P 3′ | GTTGCGGCCGCCGACATTAGCTCCGGTTTCT |
WDR16 CDS pEnT6P 5′ | CGTTCTAGAGCAGCGAAGGAGTACGAAA |
WDR16 CDS pEnT6P 3′ | TCGAGCACGGCCAGGTAGCTGAT |
WDR16 UTR pEnT6P 5′ | GCTCGAGCTTTCGCAAACCCATTCG |
WDR16 UTR pEnT6P 3′ | GTAGGATCCAACGGAAGGGTGGCAGTT |
5′ TbSAS6L HindIII pLew | ATCAAGCTTATGGATCGCATAGAAATATACTACCAG |
3′ TbSAS6L1 XhoI pLew | GATCTCGAGTCGCGTTTTTCCAAGTGTGACAGTAGC |
SAS6L LIC vector 5′ | TACTTCCAATCCAATTTAATGCACAGACGGAAATGCTCTCC |
SAS6L LIC vector 3′ | TCCTCCACTTCCAATTTTAGCGAGGAACCGAGTGGATGC |
SAS6L MBP plasmid 5′ | ATGGCGACAAACTTCGGCTTTGG |
SAS6L MBP plasmid 3′ | TATAAAGCTTTCAGAGGAACCGAGTGGATGCGCC |
ptub-SAS6L-YFP 5′ | CAAAGATCTATGGCGACAAACTTCGGCTTTGG |
ptub-SAS6L-YFP 3′ | TATACCTAGGGAGGAACCGAGTGGATGCGCC |
SAS6L KO 5′ flank 5′ | AAGGTACCCCCTCTCTTCACAGTCGAAGACC |
SAS6L KO 5′ flank 3′ | TTGGGCCCGTTATTCTGTTCGAACCCGGGG |
SAS6L KO 3′ flank 5′ | AAACTAGTCGGTGGGAGGTCTCAAGCG |
SAS6L KO 3′ flank 3′ | GCGCGGCCGCCACGTAATCACACAATCCGAGCGTATAG |
Toxoplasma SAS6L gene knockout.
We constructed a knockout vector with the pmini.GFP.HPT plasmid (58). A 4.9-kb region upstream of the TGGT1_059860 coding sequence and a 5-kb downstream region were amplified with primers listed in Table 1. These inserts were cloned upstream and downstream of the hypoxanthine xanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPT) gene. We electroporated ku80Δ hpt mutant RH tachyzoites with the construct and selected for transformants in 50 μg/ml mycophenolic acid and 50 μg/ml xanthine. Single-knockout clones were isolated from two independent transfections by single-cell cloning. We also isolated green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing transformants with a nonhomologous integration of the knockout vector. These were used in competition assays with the knockout line (see below).
Escherichia coli expression and purification of TgSAS6L.
The cDNA sequence of TgSAS6L was inserted into the c2x pMAL vector (NEB) in order to express a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-TgSAS6L fusion in E. coli. After induction for 2 h with 300 μM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), the protein was purified on an amylose column and cleaved away from MBP with Factor Xa. Dialyzed TgSAS6L was used as an immunogen to generate mouse polyclonal antiserum.
Toxoplasma conoid extrusion.
Conoid extrusion was induced in freshly lysed extracellular parasites by treatment with HEPES-buffered saline supplemented with 5 μM ionomycin (Sigma) and 5 mM CaCl2 (Sigma) (36–38), and samples were fixed as previously described (31).
Immunofluorescence staining and fluorescence microscopy.
YFP- or mCherry-tagged intracellular Toxoplasma parasites were fixed, permeabilized, and stained as previously described (27). Extracellular parasites were filtered through a 3-μm polycarbonate filter (GE Water & Process Technologies), centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and suspended in a small volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Detergent-extracted parasites were generated and stained as previously described (31). The antibodies used for immunofluorescence assays included a mouse polyclonal serum against TgSAS6L, a mouse monoclonal antibody against GFP (Roche), and a rabbit Toxoplasma-specific tubulin serum (27) detected with Alexa 594-, Alexa 488-, and Cascade blue-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). DNA was visualized by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Toxoplasma samples were imaged on a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope with the AxioVision system. Trypanosomes were settled onto glass slides and either fixed with 1% formaldehyde for whole-cell preparations or extracted with 1% Nonidet P-40 in PEME [100 mM 100 mM piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES, pH 6.9), 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA] for cytoskeleton preparations. Cells were labeled with BBA4 or YL1/2 antibodies, which were visualized with anti-mouse IgM–Cy5 and anti-rat IgG–tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Cells were mounted in 90% glycerol–50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8) supplemented with 1% 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane and 0.4 μg ml−1 DAPI.
Immunoblot assays.
Protein lysates containing ∼5 × 106 Toxoplasma tachyzoites per lane were resolved by 15% SDS-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. After blocking for 1 h in 5% milk in PBS-Tween, the blot was probed with primary antibodies (1:300 anti-TgSAS6L and 1:750 anti-ISP3 in 5% milk) for 1 h, washed in PBS-Tween, probed with a secondary antibody (1:2,000 horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody; Invitrogen) for 1 h, and washed in PBS-Tween prior to detection by chemiluminescence assay.
Electron microscopy (EM).
Freshly lysed Toxoplasma tachyzoites from stable TgSAS6L-YFP lines were isolated by filtration. Parasites were fixed and cryosectioned as previously described (31), with an anti-GFP antibody (Abcam). Trypanosomes were settled onto Formvar-coated nickel finder grids and extracted with 1% NP-40–PEME. For Ca2+ preparations, cells were additionally incubated with 65 mM Ca2+–PIPES, pH 6.9. Preparations were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde–PEME for 10 min and then neutralized with 1% glycine–PEME. Grids were mounted in H2O, and native fluorescence was analyzed with a Leica DM5500 microscope. Grids were negatively staining with 1% aurothioglucose (USP) and viewed on an FEI Tecnai-F12 electron microscope.
Toxoplasma competition assays.
T25 flasks with confluent HFF cells were inoculated with a 1:1 ratio of sas6l-null parasites and GFP-expressing clones from the same transfection that harbor a nonhomologous integration of the knockout vector (107 parasites of each line) as described in a previously established competition assay (59). The relative numbers of GFP-positive (control) and GFP-negative (sas6l-null) parasites were determined by flow cytometry (Apogee Flow Systems).
Alignments and phylogenetic analysis.
SAS6 and SAS-6-like proteins form a natural set on the basis of a BLASTp clustering approach (60). This clustering results from the presence of a conserved domain of ∼200 aa covered by a Pfam-B domain (Pfam_B_2528) of unknown function. To define the family of SAS6 and SAS-6-like proteins, the hidden Markov model defining Pfam_B_2528 was used to search the complete predicted proteomes of 44 diverse eukaryotes (HMMER3.0; hmmer.janelia.org). All 69 proteins containing the domain (e-value, <0.001) were extracted, trimmed to the conserved domain, and aligned by MAFFT v6.811b by adopting the E-INS-i strategy (61). Bayesian phylogenies were inferred from four runs of the metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo method implemented in the program MrBayes3.1.2 (62) (WAG substitution matrix; GTR+Γ+I with Γ distribution approximated to four discrete categories and shape parameters estimated from the data). Maximum-likelihood support for the inferred topology was generated from 100 bootstrap replicates of the data with PhyML3.0 (63) (LG matrix; GTR+Γ+I, as described above).
RESULTS
SAS-6 and SAS6L localize to distinct structures in Toxoplasma tachyzoites.
SAS-6 is an essential and universal component of centrioles that creates the “cartwheel hub” found at the proximal end of the centriole barrel (41, 42, 45). We came upon the hypothetical protein TGGT1_059860 during a genome database search (www.ToxoDB.org) for the Toxoplasma homolog of SAS-6. Since TGGT1_059860 has similarity to SAS-6, we named it SAS-6-like (SAS6L). When the Toxoplasma SAS-6 homolog (TGGT1_040920) was tagged by fusion of the C terminus to YFP, the label localized exclusively to the centriole, coincident with the centriolar marker centrin (Fig. 1A), as is expected from the localization of SAS-6 in other systems. In contrast, TgSAS6L localizes exclusively to a region at the apex of the parasites (Fig. 1B). Since TgSAS6L labeled a small spot in the apex of Toxoplasma tachyzoites, we induced conoid extrusion in extracellular parasites and used a marker for the APR (RNG1) (31) to localize TgSAS6L more accurately. TgSAS6L is found at the apical tip of extended conoids, above the RNG1 signal (Fig. 1C). In parasites with retracted conoids, labeling is coincident with the RNG1 marker (Fig. 1D). TgSAS6L remains associated with the cytoskeleton following treatment with deoxycholate (DOC), which extracts much of the inner membrane complex-associated cytoskeleton and frees the subpellicular microtubules. In DOC-extracted samples, TgSAS6L labeling is at the apical tip of the conoid (Fig. 1E). Immunogold labeling of TgSAS6L-YFP parasites with an anti-GFP antibody indicates that the protein is located at the apex of the conoid, in a region consistent with the preconoidal rings (Fig. 1F).
SAS6L-null Toxoplasma are less fit.
We deleted the SAS6L gene from Toxoplasma tachyzoites by targeted integration of the HPT gene (Fig. 2A) and confirmed the knockout by the absence of SAS6L protein (Fig. 2B and C). Since there are no specific markers for the conoid fibers, we induced conoid extrusion and stained with a tubulin antibody to ascertain that the conoid is still present in null parasites (not shown). TgICMAP1 is a microtubule-associated protein that specifically localizes to the two intraconoid microtubules that run down the center of the conoid (64). We used an established expression construct (pmin-eGFP-TgICMAP1 [64]) to verify that the eGFP-TgICMAP1 fusion protein correctly localizes to the region of the intraconoid microtubules in the absence of SAS6L (not shown).
During creation of the sas6lΔ mutant lines, we also cloned lines that had nonhomologous integration of the knockout vector for use as a matched control in growth competition assays. We coinfected host cells with an equivalent number of each clonal line and followed the relative rates of replication and growth over serial passage by flow cytometry (Fig. 2D). Two independent knockout lines were outcompeted by a matched control at a rate of 0.07 day−1, demonstrating a reduction in fitness. The reduced sas6lΔ mutant parasite growth observed may reflect a specific defect in a number of cellular processes required for invasion and intracellular growth (for example, motility, attachment, invasion, doubling time, replication fidelity, egress, and extracellular viability). In order to assess specific defects in these processes, we measured gliding motility, performed plaque formation assays (for invasion and extracellular survival), assessed Ca2+ ionophore-mediated egress, and quantified replication rates and the frequency of replication defects. Within the resolution of these assays, no significant differences between two independent sas6l-null lines and the matched control were detected (data not shown). However, the expected size of a specific defect in assays such as the plaque assay (∼10%, given the rate of outcompetition) was below the assay's resolving power because of the relative variation between biological replicates. Hence, it is likely that the direct fitness assay detected a defect that was below the sensitivity of the other assays in our experiments.
SAS6L is an ancient protein found in diverse simple eukaryotes.
Similarity searches suggested the presence of SAS6L homologs in diverse eukaryotes. All SAS6L proteins contain an ∼200-amino-acid (aa) conserved domain that is shared with SAS-6 homologs (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and includes the ∼50-aa PISA motif previously described in SAS-6 (42). This domain is described by the automatically generated Pfam-B domain, Pfam_B_2528. We used Pfam_B_2528 to identify proteins of the SAS-6/SAS6L family encoded by the genomes of 29 of 44 diverse eukaryotes (Fig. 3A). These proteins share an average of 24% identity (46% similarity) across the conserved domain. A similar set was defined by an alternative approach based on clustering by BLASTp score (data not shown).
Phylogenetic analysis based on the conserved domain robustly supported the existence of two subfamilies comprising SAS-6 and SAS6L (Fig. 3B). Genes encoding SAS-6 are found in the genomes of eukaryotes that are known to build a centriole or basal body and also in the microsporidian Encephalitozoon cuniculi and Ostreococcus tauri as previously described (42–45, 60). With the exception of Giardia lamblia, which lacks an identifiable SAS-6 ortholog (60), SAS6L is found only in lineages that also contain SAS-6 (Fig. 3A). In addition to Toxoplasma, SAS6L is found in multiple protistan lineages (including other apicomplexans, such as Plasmodium and Cryptosporidium species). However, SAS6L appears to be absent from metazoan and choanoflagellate genomes (Holozoa). The presence of SAS6L in a basal flagellate fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) indicates that the absence of SAS6L from animals is likely the result of a specific loss near the root of Holozoa.
Although only the conserved domain was used to define the phylogenetic families, the SAS-6 and SAS6L proteins have clearly distinct architectures (Fig. 3B). SAS-6 sequences are generally ∼600 aa in length and comprise the conserved domain near the N terminus, followed by ∼300 aa of sequence rich in predicted coiled coils. In contrast, SAS6L sequences contain little sequence outside the conserved domain and appear to lack the C-terminal tail entirely. The conserved domain essentially matches the globular head domain of SAS-6, the structure of which has been solved (50, 51). Homology modeling suggests that SAS6L proteins can adopt structures very similar to those seen in the head of SAS-6 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). The apicomplexan SAS-6 proteins are unusual in possessing long N-terminal extensions before the conserved domain (Fig. 3B).
TbSAS6L localizes to the axonemal basal plate in trypanosomes.
Antiserum against TgSAS6L labels a spot at the apex of the related parasite Neospora caninum (not shown). Unfortunately, our antiserum does not label SAS6L proteins in more distantly related organisms, such as Tetrahymena thermophila (data not shown). Since the majority of SAS6L-producing eukaryotes do not have a conoid, we tested the localization of a SAS6L ortholog in a distantly related organism. In Trypanosoma brucei trypomastigotes constitutively expressing TbSAS6L-YFP from the endogenous locus, TbSAS6L-YFP localizes near the base of the flagellum (Fig. 4A to C). Label appears as one or two prominent dots, depending on the cell cycle stage, and there is also weaker labeling in the proximal region of the axoneme, in the region of the flagellar pocket collar. TbSAS6L-YFP labeling is distal to markers of the proximal (BBA4), middle (tyrosinated α-tubulin, YL1/2), and distal (WDR16) parts of the basal body. Quantification of the location of TbSAS6L-YFP relative to these markers indicates that this protein is located in a fixed position within the axoneme (Fig. 4D), in a region consistent with the location of the basal plate (the area where the central-pair microtubules of a flagellar axoneme are nucleated). Ablation of TbSAS6L by RNA interference does not alter the overall morphology of the flagellum, as viewed by EM, suggesting that SAS6L has a nonessential role in flagellum formation (not shown). This is not entirely surprising, given the plasticity of flagellum formation, but it is also, of course, extremely difficult to detect subtle alterations in this complex structure.
Overexpression of SAS6L-YFP causes ectopic filament formation.
To investigate the in vivo properties of SAS6L, we expressed tagged SAS6L in both Toxoplasma and Trypanosoma over endogenous protein. In Toxoplasma, when TgSAS6L-YFP expression was driven from the α1-tubulin promoter, excess protein assembled into filaments in a subset of the sibling Toxoplasma parasites within a single parasitophorous vacuole (Fig. 5A). Filaments sometimes deformed the parasite's shape and may interfere with cell division, as in the parasites shown in Fig. 5B, where a large filament extends between daughters that have begun a new round of replication without completing scission. TgSAS6L-YFP filaments form when intracellular parasites are treated with oryzalin, which inhibits microtubule polymerization (not shown). Ectopic TgSAS6L-YFP filaments are retained after extraction with 1% Triton X-100 but are sensitive to 10 mg/ml DOC, which removed TgSAS6L-YFP filaments without disrupting the apical TgSAS6L signal (Fig. 5C). Immunogold staining of EM cryosections of whole cells showed that TgSAS6L-YFP was associated with continuous electron-dense structures in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5D).
Overexpression of TbSAS6L-YFP in trypanosomes also resulted in the accumulation of ectopic filaments (Fig. 5E). The formation of these structures has no effect on the morphology or duplication time of the cells (data not shown). The filaments are insensitive to extraction with nonionic detergent (Nonidet P-40) and are not labeled with anti-tubulin antibodies (not shown), indicating that they are independent of microtubules. TbSAS6L-YFP filaments are insensitive to treatment with Ca2+, which depolymerizes T. brucei subpellicular microtubules (Fig. 5G). Correlative microscopy of detergent-extracted trypomastigotes was used to unambiguously determine the ultrastructure of TbSAS6L-YFP filaments by first identifying filaments by fluorescence microscopy and subsequently imaging them by EM (Fig. 5F and G). TbSAS6L filaments are ∼20 nm wide but have a structure distinct from that of microtubules (Fig. 5G).
DISCUSSION
We describe a novel conserved protein that is related to the centriole protein SAS-6, which we have hence named the SAS-6-like (SAS6L) protein. The existence of SAS6L produced by diverse organisms suggests that this protein appeared early in eukaryote evolution and most likely before the last common ancestor of all extant eukaryotes (65). SAS6L is found in simple eukaryotes that contain SAS-6 and centrioles/basal bodies, but the protein has been lost from the holozoan lineage. SAS6L proteins consist of a conserved domain that also comprises the N-terminal head domain of SAS-6. Recent data have shown that SAS-6 forms homodimers through interactions between their coiled-coil tail domains and that these homodimers interact via other parts of the head domain to form higher-order structures (in particular, rings) (50, 51). Since SAS6L proteins lack a SAS-6 tail, they cannot dimerize by this means. However, the opposite face of the protein is available for interaction and is predicted to have a structure very similar to that of SAS-6. The observation that overexpression of SAS6L proteins induces SAS6L filament formation indicates that SAS6L proteins do, indeed, have the ability to form higher-order structures. However, the distinct localization of SAS-6 and SAS6L proteins in Toxoplasma and Trypanosoma suggests that these proteins do not form heterodimers in vivo. The decreased stability of the ectopic SAS6L filaments after DOC extraction suggests that additional interactions stabilize the native preconoidal ring structure and do not occur in the cytoplasmic filaments.
Consistent with its location in other diverse eukaryotes, SAS-6 localizes to the basal body in Trypanosoma and the centriole Toxoplasma tachyzoites. In contrast, SAS6L localizes to the region of the basal plate in Trypanosoma brucei—the electron-dense region at the distal end of the transition zone from which the central-pair microtubules are nucleated. Unlike T. brucei (where flagella are present in all life cycle forms), only the microgamete forms of Toxoplasma or other apicomplexan organisms build flagella (24, 32, 66–69). Comparative genomics indicate that the Toxoplasma and Plasmodium genomes lack a surprising number of conserved basal-body components (60), and while studies of Plasmodium microgamete development show de novo formation of basal bodies (66), it is unclear whether Toxoplasma microgamete basal bodies form de novo or if the atypical centriole found in the asexual tachyzoite stage serves as a template for basal-body formation. We anticipate that SAS6L will also localize to the basal plate region in Toxoplasma microgametes, but because of the difficulty in obtaining this stage from cat intestinal epithelium, we cannot verify this prediction. In agreement with this hypothesis, there is evidence of upregulation of the Plasmodium falciparum ortholog of SAS6L (PF3D7_1316400) in gametocyte development (70).
The Toxoplasma tachyzoite stage causes most of the pathology associated with parasite infection. Despite lacking flagella, tachyzoites are motile and employ an unusual substrate-dependent gliding motility that requires actin and myosin (71–73). The apical region of tachyzoites is vital to host cell invasion and contains specialized secretory organelles (micronemes and rhoptries) and a complex and unusual organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton (28, 39, 74, 75). The elongated cell shape of tachyzoites is maintained by a corset of 22 subpellicular microtubules that radiate out of the APR. An additional tubulin-based structure, the conoid, can be extended through the APR or retracted into it. In intracellular parasites, the conoid is retracted and immotile, while in extracellular parasites, the conoid can extend and retract as tachyzoites glide and invade host cells (36). Extension of the conoid is associated with the elongation and narrowing of the apical end of tachyzoites, and it is believed that the conoid has a mechanical role in parasite invasion of host cells.
Apicomplexans share ancestry with ciliates and dinoflagellates; collectively, these organisms are classified as alveolates (76, 77). It is likely that the last common ancestor of apicomplexans and dinoflagellates had an open-sided “incomplete” conoid that was modified into a closed conoid in apicomplexans and lost from dinoflagellates (77, 78). Within the Apicomplexa, the conoid was again lost from noncoccidian lineages. Although “true” conoid structures are found only in coccidian apicomplexans, alveolates such as Colpodella vorax and Rastrimonas subtilis (previously known as Cryptophagus subtilis) have “pseudoconoid” or “incomplete conoid” structures consisting of a set of 5 to 14 interlinked microtubules located at the cell apex but lack the adjacent APR structure observed in coccidians (78–81). Colpodella and Rastrimonas also contain apical secretory organelles reminiscent of apicomplexan micronemes and rhoptries that are used along with a pseudoconoid to partially or completely invade other unicellular protists. Colpodella attaches to and aspirates the cytoplasmic contents of unicellular flagellates (76, 78, 80, 81), while Rastrimonas is an intracellular parasite of unicellular algae (79, 80). The precise phylogenetic position of Colpodella and Rastrimonas is unclear, as these alveolates have been variously described as dinoflagellates, as early-branching apicomplexans, as Perkinsozoa, or within sister lineages of dinoflagellates or apicomplexans (76, 78, 80, 81). What is clear is that these organisms are poised between predator and parasite states and provide tantalizing clues to the evolution of the intracellular apicomplexan lifestyle. Both Colpodella and Rastrimonas simultaneously build a pseudoconoid structure and adjacent flagella (Fig. 6A and B). In contrast, the flagellar axoneme and “true” conoid are mutually exclusive structures in coccidian parasites; microgametes have apically located basal bodies that template flagellar axonemes, while asexual proliferative-stage coccidians have juxtanuclear centrioles and apical conoid structures (Fig. 6A and B). This study describes SAS6L, a novel conserved protein that is located in the region of the basal plate of the axoneme in T. brucei and above the conoid in Toxoplasma tachyzoites, a life cycle stage that lacks flagella (Fig. 6C). Rastrimonas absorbs its flagella during intracellular growth, and this feature may have become more pronounced during the evolution of apicomplexan parasites, ultimately leading to the loss of flagella in all stages other than microgametes. Our results emphasize this relationship between the conoid and flagellum, providing molecular evidence of a link between these organelles.
The observations presented here are reinforced by recent work on the basal-body-associated protein SFA (striated fiber assemblin) in Toxoplasma. SFA proteins were first described in green algae, where flagellar basal bodies are embedded in a “cage” of flagellar rootlet fibers. Rootlets consist of distinct populations of centrin-containing contractile fibers (82), sinister fibers (83), and SFA-containing noncontractile striated fibers (84, 85). Genes for SFA homologs are found in apicomplexan genomes (86, 87). Remarkably, two SFA proteins (TgSFA2 and TgSFA3) form a filament that links the upper edge of the conoid to the juxtanuclear centrioles during tachyzoite replication (88). The SFAs appear shortly after centriole duplication (87), colocalizing in a fiber-like structure that emerges from the centrioles and extends apically to tether the conoid and APR to the centrioles (88). Loss of either SFA protein inhibits parasite replication by blocking the formation of daughter APRs and the subsequent construction of daughter buds. Nuclear division is not inhibited, and multiple nuclei accumulate in these aberrant parasites. These results suggest that although the asexual stages of apicomplexans have dispensed with building flagella, they retain SFAs to ensure the reliable inheritance of apical organelles.
Given the observation that the SFAs and SAS6L are retained in aflagellate tachyzoites, an intriguing possibility is that SAS6L is one of the components that tether the SFA filament to the conoid. SAS6L cannot be the sole factor anchoring SFA to the apex, as our results indicate that SAS6L is not essential (although its loss is associated with a fitness defect) while loss of either SFA2 or SFA3 leads to a lethal arrest at the time of daughter cell budding. In light of our data on SAS6L and the observations on SFA2 and SFA3, we propose that the complete conoid evolved from an ancestral pseudoconoid in part by the incorporation of components from a vestigial apical flagellar apparatus. These components may have been from flagellum-associated structures, such as flagellar rootlets (as seen for the small portion of Trypanosoma SAS6L that is associated with the flagellar collar region), or could represent the direct subsumption of the flagellum into the conoid. The former premise suggests that flagellar components are retained because they are required for an essential cellular process, such as replication. In this context, SAS6L may have been retained along with the basal-body-associated SFA proteins in order to coordinate organelle inheritance in aflagellar tachyzoites (88). The latter hypothesis implies direct homology between the central-pair microtubules of the axoneme and the microtubule pair at the center of the conoid and suggests that other orthologs of basal-plate and central-apparatus components may play a role in invasion or replication by coccidia.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Catherine Li and Ni Yao for technical assistance, David Coder for guidance with flow cytometry, and David Krueger for advice on Illustrator. Ke Hu (Indiana University) kindly provided us with the pmin-eGFP-TgICMAP1 construct. David Ferguson (Oxford) was a critically important sounding board for ideas about the apicomplexan basal body, and Susan Dutcher (Washington University) critically commented on the manuscript.
N.S. was supported by a graduate studentship from the EPA Trust, and research was funded by NIH grant AI067981 to N.S.M., a Wellcome Trust grant to K.G., and BBSRC New Investigator grant BB/J01477X/1 to B.W.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 17 May 2013
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00096-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. Dutcher SK. 2004. Dissection of basal body and centriole function in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, p 71–92 In Nigg EA. (ed), Centrosomes in development and disease. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany: [Google Scholar]
- 2. Azimzadeh J, Marshall WF. 2010. Building the centriole. Curr. Biol. 20: R816– R825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Marshall WF. 2009. Centriole evolution. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21: 14– 19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kobayashi T, Dynlacht BD. 2011. Regulating the transition from centriole to basal body. J. Cell Biol. 193: 435– 444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Azimzadeh J, Bornens M. 2007. Structure and duplication of the centrosome. J. Cell Sci. 120: 2139– 2142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bornens M. 2008. Organelle positioning and cell polarity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9: 874– 886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Paoletti A, Bornens M. 1997. Organisation and functional regulation of the centrosome in animal cells. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 3: 285– 299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chapman MJ, Dolan MF, Margulis L. 2000. Centrioles and kinetosomes: form, function, and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 75: 409– 429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schrevel J, Besse C. 1975. A functional flagella with a 6 + 0 pattern. J. Cell Biol. 66: 492– 507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Preble AM, Giddings TM, Jr, Dutcher SK. 2000. Basal bodies and centrioles: their function and structure. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 49: 207– 233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Waters JC, Salmon E. 1997. Pathways of spindle assembly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9: 37– 43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Marshall WF, Vucica Y, Rosenbaum JL. 2001. Kinetics and regulation of de novo centriole assembly. Implications for the mechanism of centriole duplication. Curr. Biol. 11: 308– 317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Basto R, Lau J, Vinogradova T, Gardiol A, Woods CG, Khodjakov A, Raff JW. 2006. Flies without centrioles. Cell 125: 1375– 1386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hinchcliffe EH, Miller FJ, Cham M, Khodjakov A, Sluder G. 2001. Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase. Science 291: 1547– 1550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Piel M, Nordberg J, Euteneuer U, Bornens M. 2001. Centrosome-dependent exit of cytokinesis in animal cells. Science 291: 1550– 1553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mignot J-P. 1996. The centrosomal big bang: from a unique central organelle towards a constellation of MTOCs. Biol. Cell 86: 81– 91 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Despommier D, RG, Hotez P, Knirsch C. 2005. Parasitic diseases, fifth edition. Apple Trees Productions, LLC, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kohl L, Gull K. 1998. Molecular architecture of the trypanosome cytoskeleton. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 93: 1– 9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Briggs LJ, Davidge JA, Wickstead B, Ginger ML, Gull K. 2004. More than one way to build a flagellum: comparative genomics of parasitic protozoa. Curr. Biol. 14: R611– R612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gull K, Briggs L, Vaughan S. 2004. Basal bodies and microtubule organization in pathogenic protozoa, p 401–423 In Nigg EA. (ed), Centrosomes in development and disease. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gull K. 1999. The cytoskeleton of trypanosomatid parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53: 629– 655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Seeback T, Hemphill A, Lawson D. 1990. The cytoskeleton of trypanosomes. Parasitol. Today 6: 49– 52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Scott V, Sherwin T, Gull K. 1997. Gamma-tubulin in trypanosomes: molecular characterisation and localisation to multiple and diverse microtubule organising centres. J. Cell Sci. 110(Pt 2):157–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ferguson DJP, Hutchison WM, Dunachie JF, Siim JC. 1974. Ultrastructural study of early stages of asexual multiplication and microgametogony of Toxoplasma gondii in the small intestine of the cat. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B Microbiol. Immunol. 82B: 167– 181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Frixione E, Mondragon R, Meza I. 1996. Kinematic analysis of Toxoplasma gondii motility. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 34: 152– 163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Håkansson S, Morisaki H, Heuser J, Sibley LD. 1999. Time-lapse video microscopy of gliding motility in Toxoplasma gondii reveals a novel, biphasic mechanism of cell locomotion. Mol. Biol. Cell 10: 3539– 3547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. 2002. Disruption of microtubules uncouples budding and nuclear division in Toxoplasma gondii. J. Cell Sci. 115: 1017– 1025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nichols BA, Chiappino ML. 1987. Cytoskeleton of Toxoplasma gondii. J. Protozool. 34: 217– 226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Shaw MK, Compton HL, Roos DS, Tilney LG. 2000. Microtubules, but not actin filaments, drive daughter cell budding and cell division in Toxoplasma gondii. J. Cell Sci. 113: 1241– 1254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Russell DG, Burns RG. 1984. The polar ring of coccidian sporozoites: a unique microtubule-organizing centre. J. Cell Sci. 65: 193– 207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Tran JQ, de Leon JC, Li C, Huynh MH, Beatty W, Morrissette NS. 2010. RNG1 is a late marker of the apical polar ring in Toxoplasma gondii. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 67: 586– 598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sibert GJ, Speer CA. 1981. Fine structure of nuclear division and microgametogony of Eimeria nieschulzi Dieben, 1924. Z. Parasitenkd. 66: 179– 189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dubremetz JF, Elsner YY. 1979. Ultrastructural study of schizogony of Eimeria bovis in cell cultures. J. Protozool. 26: 367– 376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gubbels MJ, Vaishnava S, Boot N, Dubremetz JF, Striepen B. 2006. A MORN-repeat protein is a dynamic component of the Toxoplasma gondii cell division apparatus. J. Cell Sci. 119: 2236– 2245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Brooks CF, Francia ME, Gissot M, Croken MM, Kim K, Striepen B. 2011. Toxoplasma gondii sequesters centromeres to a specific nuclear region throughout the cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108: 3767– 3772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Del Carmen MG, Mondragon M, Gonzalez S, Mondragon R. 2009. Induction and regulation of conoid extrusion in Toxoplasma gondii. Cell. Microbiol. 11: 967– 982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mondragon R, Frixione E. 1996. Ca(2+)-dependence of conoid extrusion in Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43: 120– 127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Monteiro VG, de Melo EJ, Attias M, de Souza W. 2001. Morphological changes during conoid extrusion in Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites treated with calcium ionophore. J. Struct. Biol. 136: 181– 189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Morrissette NS, Murray JM, Roos DS. 1997. Subpellicular microtubules associate with an intramembranous particle lattice in the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. J. Cell Sci. 110(Pt 1):35–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sheffield HG. 1966. Electron microscope study of the proliferative form of Besnoitia jellisoni. J. Parasitol. 52: 583– 594 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Culver BP, Meehl JB, Giddings TH, Jr, Winey M. 2009. The two SAS-6 homologs in Tetrahymena thermophila have distinct functions in basal body assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 20: 1865– 1877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Leidel S, Delattre M, Cerutti L, Baumer K, Gonczy P. 2005. SAS-6 defines a protein family required for centrosome duplication in C. elegans and in human cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 7: 115– 125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Pelletier L, O'Toole E, Schwager A, Hyman AA, Muller-Reichert T. 2006. Centriole assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 444: 619– 623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Dammermann A, Muller-Reichert T, Pelletier L, Habermann B, Desai A, Oegema K. 2004. Centriole assembly requires both centriolar and pericentriolar material proteins. Dev. Cell 7: 815– 829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nakazawa Y, Hiraki M, Kamiya R, Hirono M. 2007. SAS-6 is a cartwheel protein that establishes the 9-fold symmetry of the centriole. Curr. Biol. 17: 2169– 2174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Stevens NR, Roque H, Raff JW. 2010. DSas-6 and Ana2 coassemble into tubules to promote centriole duplication and engagement. Dev. Cell 19: 913– 919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Blachon S, Cai X, Roberts KA, Yang K, Polyanovsky A, Church A, Avidor-Reiss T. 2009. A proximal centriole-like structure is present in Drosophila spermatids and can serve as a model to study centriole duplication. Genetics 182: 133– 144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rodrigues-Martins A, Riparbelli M, Callaini G, Glover DM, Bettencourt-Dias M. 2008. From centriole biogenesis to cellular function: centrioles are essential for cell division at critical developmental stages. Cell Cycle 7: 11– 16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rodrigues-Martins A, Bettencourt-Dias M, Riparbelli M, Ferreira C, Ferreira I, Callaini G, Glover DM. 2007. DSAS-6 organizes a tube-like centriole precursor, and its absence suggests modularity in centriole assembly. Curr. Biol. 17: 1465– 1472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kitagawa D, Vakonakis I, Olieric N, Hilbert M, Keller D, Olieric V, Bortfeld M, Erat MC, Fluckiger I, Gonczy P, Steinmetz MO. 2011. Structural basis of the 9-fold symmetry of centrioles. Cell 144: 364– 375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. van Breugel M, Hirono M, Andreeva A, Yanagisawa HA, Yamaguchi S, Nakazawa Y, Morgner N, Petrovich M, Ebong IO, Robinson CV, Johnson CM, Veprintsev D, Zuber B. 2011. Structures of SAS-6 suggest its organization in centrioles. Science 331: 1196– 1199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Huynh MH, Carruthers VB. 2009. Tagging of endogenous genes in a Toxoplasma gondii strain lacking Ku80. Eukaryot. Cell 8: 530– 539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Roos DS, Donald RG, Morrissette NS, Moulton AL. 1994. Molecular tools for genetic dissection of the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Methods Cell Biol. 45: 27– 63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Brun R, Schonenberger 1979. Cultivation and in vitro cloning or procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Short communication. Acta Trop. 36: 289– 292 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wirtz E, Leal S, Ochatt C, Cross GA. 1999. A tightly regulated inducible expression system for conditional gene knock-outs and dominant-negative genetics in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 99: 89– 101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kelly S, Reed J, Kramer S, Ellis L, Webb H, Sunter J, Salje J, Marinsek N, Gull K, Wickstead B, Carrington M. 2007. Functional genomics in Trypanosoma brucei: a collection of vectors for the expression of tagged proteins from endogenous and ectopic gene loci. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 154: 103– 109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hartmann J, Hu K, He CY, Pelletier L, Roos DS, Warren G. 2006. Golgi and centrosome cycles in Toxoplasma gondii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 145: 125– 127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gilbert LA, Ravindran S, Turetzky JM, Boothroyd JC, Bradley PJ. 2007. Toxoplasma gondii targets a protein phosphatase 2C to the nuclei of infected host cells. Eukaryot. Cell 6: 73– 83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ma C, Tran J, Li C, Ganesan L, Wood D, Morrissette N. 2008. Secondary mutations correct fitness defects in Toxoplasma gondii with dinitroaniline resistance mutations. Genetics 180: 845– 856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hodges ME, Scheumann N, Wickstead B, Langdale JA, Gull K. 2010. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the centriole from protein components. J. Cell Sci. 123: 1407– 1413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 511– 518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572– 1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696– 704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Heaslip AT, Ems-McClung SC, Hu K. 2009. TgICMAP1 is a novel microtubule binding protein in Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS One 4: e7406. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Stechmann A, Cavalier-Smith T. 2002. Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 297:89– 91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Sinden R, Talman A, Marques S, Wass M, Sternberg M. 2010. The flagellum in malarial parasites. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13: 491– 500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Mueller BE, Desser SS, Haberkorn A. 1981. Ultrastructure of developing gamonts of Eimeria contorta Haberkorn, 1971 (Protozoa, Sporozoa) with emphasis on the host-parasite interface. J. Parasitol. 67: 487– 495 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ferguson DJP, Birch-Andersen A, Hutchison WM, Siim JC. 1980. Ultrastructural observations on microgametogenesis and the structure of the microgamete of Isospora felis. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B Microbiol. 88B: 151– 159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Scholtyseck E, Mehlhorn H, Hammond DM. 1972. Electron microscope studies of microgametogenesis in coccidia and related groups. Z Parasitenkd. 38: 95– 131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Young JA, Fivelman QL, Blair PL, de la Vega P, Le Roch KG, Zhou Y, Carucci DJ, Baker DA, Winzeler EA. 2005. The Plasmodium falciparum sexual development transcriptome: a microarray analysis using ontology-based pattern identification. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 143: 67– 79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Keeley A, Soldati D. 2004. The glideosome: a molecular machine powering motility and host-cell invasion by Apicomplexa. Trends Cell Biol. 14: 528– 532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sibley LD. 2004. Intracellular parasite invasion strategies. Science 304: 248– 253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Baum J, Richard D, Healer J, Rug M, Krnajski Z, Gilberger TW, Green JL, Holder AA, Cowman AF. 2006. A conserved molecular motor drives cell invasion and gliding motility across malaria life cycle stages and other apicomplexan parasites. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 5197– 5208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. 2002. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66: 21– 38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Hu K, Roos DS, Murray JM. 2002. A novel polymer of tubulin forms the conoid of Toxoplasma gondii. J. Cell Biol. 156: 1039– 1050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. 2004. Protalveolate phylogeny and systematics and the origins of Sporozoa and dinoflagellates (phylum Myzozoa nom. nov.). Eur. J. Protistol. 40: 185– 212 [Google Scholar]
- 77. Leander BS, Keeling PJ. 2003. Morphostasis in alveolate evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 395– 402 [Google Scholar]
- 78. Leander BS, Kuvardina ON, Aleshin VV, Mylnikov AP, Keeling PJ. 2003. Molecular phylogeny and surface morphology of Colpodella edax (Alveolata): insights into the phagotrophic ancestry of apicomplexans. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 50: 334– 340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Brugerolle G. 2002. Cryptophagus subtilis: a new parasite of cryptophytes affiliated with the Perkinsozoa lineage. Eur. J. Protistol. 37: 379– 390 [Google Scholar]
- 80. Brugerolle G. 2002. Colpodella vorax: ultrastructure, predation, life-cycle, mitosis, and phylogenetic relationships. Eur. J. Protistol. 38: 113– 125 [Google Scholar]
- 81. Simpson A, Patterson D. 1996. Ultrastructure and identification of the predatory flagellate Colpodella pugnax Cienkowski (Apicomplexa) with a description of Colpodella turpis n. sp. and a review of the genus. Syst. Parasitol. 33: 187– 198 [Google Scholar]
- 82. Salisbury JL. 1995. Centrin, centrosomes, and mitotic spindle poles. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7: 39– 45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Geimer S, Clees J, Melkonian M, Lechtreck KF. 1998. A novel 95-kD protein is located in a linker between cytoplasmic microtubules and basal bodies in a green flagellate and forms striated filaments in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 140: 1149– 1158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Lechtreck KF, Frins S, Bilski J, Teltenkotter A, Weber K, Melkonian M. 1996. The cruciated microtubule-associated fibers of the green alga Dunaliella bioculata consist of a 31 kDa SF-assemblin. J. Cell Sci. 109(Pt 4):827–835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Lechtreck KF, Melkonian M. 1991. Striated microtubule-associated fibers: identification of assemblin, a novel 34-kD protein that forms paracrystals of 2-nm filaments in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 115: 705– 716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Harper JD, Thuet J, Lechtreck KF, Hardham AR. 2009. Proteins related to green algal striated fiber assemblin are present in stramenopiles and alveolates. Protoplasma 236: 97– 101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Lechtreck KF. 2003. Striated fiber assemblin in apicomplexan parasites. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 128: 95– 99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Francia ME, Jordan CN, Patel JD, Sheiner L, Demerly JL, Fellows JD, de Leon JC, Morrissette NS, Dubremetz JF, Striepen B. 2012. Cell division in apicomplexan parasites is organized by a homolog of the striated rootlet fiber of algal flagella. PLoS Biol. 10: e1001444. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A. 2010. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D211– D222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252: 1162– 1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.