Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2013 Jul;79(14):4517. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00606-13

Reply to “Syntrophic Propionate Oxidation via Butyrate: a Novel Window of Opportunity under Methanogenic Conditions”

Yahai Lu 1,
PMCID: PMC3697516  PMID: 23787900

REPLY

In a study that evaluated the oxidation of propionate in anoxic microcosms of rice paddy soil, we proposed that both the methylmalonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) pathway and the six-carbon-intermediate (6-C) pathway (see reference 1 for historical work on the 6-C pathway) were involved in the metabolism of propionate (2). Dolfing (3) calculated the Gibbs free energy for these two pathways and concluded that the 6-C pathway (referred to as the Smithella pathway by Dolfing) is thermodynamically more advantageous than the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway (referred to as the classical propionate degradation pathway by Dolfing). He proposed that the 6-C pathway opens a novel window of opportunity for the oxidation of propionate under methanogenic conditions. Smithella species are known to utilize the 6-C pathway and have been detected in various anoxic environments (4, 5), suggesting that this pathway may be widespread.

Dolfing (3) indicated that the utilization of the 6-C pathway could explain why the oxidation of propionate occurred under conditions that were thermodynamically unfavorable for the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway in anoxic incubations of rice paddy soil (6). This is certainly an excellent explanation for the observations reported. However, the experiments with chemostat cocultures of Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Methanospirillum hungatei indicate that propionate oxidation via the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway can occur when the Gibbs free energy is greater than −10 kJ per mol propionate (7), a value much lower than the theoretical minimum energy quantum (−20 kJ per mol) needed for the conservation of energy as determined by the synthesis of ATP (8). Thus, even the syntrophs utilizing the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway have probably evolved unusual mechanisms to surpass the unfavorable thermodynamic conditions. In this regard, both Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum, the classical syntrophs employing the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway, harbor a rich machinery to use formate instead of H2 as the electron shuttle for the syntrophic interaction (9, 10). It was known that interspecies formate transfer might sustain a 100-fold-higher conversion of substrate than can interspecies H2 transfer based on Fick's diffusion law (11). Furthermore, it has been shown that P. thermopropionicum synthesizes flagellum-like filaments and extracellular polymers that might stimulate microbial aggregation and enhance interspecies electron transfer with a methanogenic partner (12, 13). These collective observations and the thermodynamic considerations delineated by Dolfing (3) reinforce the likelihood that propionate-utilizing syntrophs have diverse mechanisms to overcome energetic barriers.

Footnotes

This is a response to a letter by Dolfing (doi:10.1128/AEM.00111-13).

REFERENCES

  • 1. de Bok FAM, Stams AJM, Dijkema C, Boone DR. 2001. Pathway of propionate oxidation by a syntrophic culture of Smithella propionica and Methanospirillum hungatei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1800–1804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gan Y, Qiu Q, Liu P, Rui J, Lu Y. 2012. Syntrophic oxidation of propionate in rice field soil at 15 and 30°C under methanogenic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 4923–4932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dolfing J. 2013. Syntrophic propionate oxidation via butyrate: a novel window of opportunity under methanogenic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 4515–4516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ito T, Yoshiguchi K, Ariesyady HD, Okabe S. 2012. Identification and quantification of key microbial trophic groups of methanogenic glucose degradation in an anaerobic digester sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 123: 599–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Siddique T, Penner T, Klassen J, Nesbo C, Foght JM. 2012. Microbial communities involved in methane production from hydrocarbons in oil sands tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46: 9802–9810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Krylova NI, Conrad R. 1998. Thermodynamics of propionate degradation in methanogenic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26: 281–288 [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Scholten JCM, Conrad R. 2000. Energetics of syntrophic propionate oxidation in defined batch and chemostat cocultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2934–2942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schink B. 1997. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61: 262–280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stams AJM, Plugge CM. 2009. Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 568–577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Worm P, Stams AJM, Cheng X, Plugge CM. 2011. Growth- and substrate-dependent transcription of formate dehydrogenase and hydrogenase coding genes in Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Methanospirillum hungatei. Microbiology 157: 280–289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dong X, Stams AJM. 1995. Evidence for H2 and formate formation during syntrophic butyrate and propionate degradation. Anaerobe 1: 35–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ishii S, Kosaka T, Hori K, Hotta Y, Watanabe K. 2005. Coaggregation facilitates interspecies hydrogen transfer between Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 7838–7845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shimoyama T, Kato S, Ishii S, Watanabe K. 2009. Flagellum mediates symbiosis. Science 323: 1574. 10.1126/science.1170086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES