Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2013 Jul;51(7):2245–2249. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00495-13

Fluoroquinolone and Macrolide Resistance-Associated Mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium

Kaitlin A Tagg a,b,, Neisha J Jeoffreys b, Deborah L Couldwell c,d, Jennifer A Donald a, Gwendolyn L Gilbert b,d
PMCID: PMC3697725  PMID: 23658265

Abstract

Mycoplasma genitalium is a significant sexually transmitted pathogen, causing up to 25% of cases of nongonococcal urethritis in men, and it is strongly associated with cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease in women. Currently, the usual first-line treatment is the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin, but an increasing incidence of treatment failure over the last 5 years suggests the emergence of antibiotic resistance. The mutations responsible for macrolide resistance have been found in the 23S rRNA gene in numerous M. genitalium populations. A second-line antibiotic, the fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin, was thought to be a reliable alternative when azithromycin began to fail, but recent studies have identified mutations that may confer fluoroquinolone resistance in the genes parC and gyrA. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in M. genitalium in Sydney, Australia, by detecting relevant mutations in the 23S rRNA gene, parC, and gyrA. M. genitalium-positive DNA extracts of specimens, collected from patients attending sexual health clinics in Sydney, were tested by PCR amplification and DNA sequence alignment. The 186 specimens tested included 143 initial patient specimens and 43 second, or subsequent, specimens from 24 patients. We identified known macrolide resistance-associated mutations in the 23S rRNA gene in 43% of the initial patient samples and mutations potentially associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in parC or gyrA sequences in 15% of the initial patient samples. These findings support anecdotal clinical reports of azithromycin and moxifloxacin treatment failures in Sydney. Our results indicate that further surveillance is needed, and testing and treatment protocols for M. genitalium infections may need to be reviewed.

INTRODUCTION

Mycoplasma genitalium, one of the smallest known self-replicating organisms (1), is an obligate parasite, preferring the human genital tract as its host environment (24). In men, M. genitalium is a significant cause of both acute and chronic nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) (57) and is estimated to account for 15% to 25% of cases of NGU in some populations (2). In women, M. genitalium has been significantly associated with both cervicitis (2, 810) and pelvic inflammatory disease (2, 1114), and it has been identified in up to 7.3% of women in high-risk populations (15). In Australia, M. genitalium has been reported to account for between 4.5% and 9% of cases of NGU (16, 17), while it was identified in 4% of women attending a Sydney sexual health clinic and was the second most common cause of cervicitis (9).

The usual treatment regime for clinically diagnosed NGU and cervicitis is a single dose of 1 g azithromycin (AZM) (18). An extended regime (1.5 g over 5 days) is often prescribed if single-dose AZM is unsuccessful, but there is contention regarding the effectiveness of this extended treatment (19, 20). Alarmingly, studies investigating the effectiveness of either 1 g or 1.5 g AZM treatment have reported microbiological treatment failure in 16% to 33% of patients (19, 2124). Point mutations at positions 2058 and 2059 (Escherichia coli numbering) in region V of the 23S rRNA gene (25, 26) are consistently identified in M. genitalium strains taken from patients in whom AZM treatment has failed; these strains exhibit high levels of AZM resistance in vitro (25, 2729).

Moxifloxacin (MXF) is used as a second-line treatment for M. genitalium-associated NGU and cervicitis (21, 30) and is consistently found to be among the most active drugs against M. genitalium in vitro (31, 32). Clinical resistance to MXF has not yet been formally reported in M. genitalium infections. However, a recent study has identified point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) (33) of the topoisomerase IV gene parC in 11% of M. genitalium clinical specimens, suggesting the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance (34). In addition, mutations in the QRDR of the DNA gyrase gene, gyrA, have been identified in fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, the closest relative to M. genitalium (35).

Little is known about the incidence of AZM and MXF resistance in M. genitalium in Sydney, Australia, despite the regular use of these antibiotics. The aim of this study was therefore to estimate the prevalence of resistance to these antibiotics in M. genitalium-positive specimens taken from patients attending sexual health clinics. PCR amplification and DNA sequencing were utilized to detect the presence of potential resistance-inducing mutations in the 23S rRNA gene, parC, and gyrA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, Western Sydney Local Health District (Westmead, Australia). All clinical specimens were collected from patients attending sexual health clinics in Sydney, Australia, between 2008 and 2011. All processing and testing of samples for the detection of M. genitalium were performed at the Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (CIDM) Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead Hospital (Westmead, Australia). Samples were analyzed without knowledge of the identity of the patients or the clinic from which the samples were collected.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing.

DNA was extracted from 186 clinical specimens (urine or urethral or cervical swabs) using the NucliSENS easyMag (bioMérieux, France), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Extracts were then tested for the presence of M. genitalium DNA using an in-house PCR assay targeting mgpB, and those that were positive were frozen at −20°C with an aliquot of the original specimen.

The primers used for the amplification of the 23S rRNA gene (25), parC, and gyrA (34) have been described previously. In addition, a second gyrA primer set that did not contain degenerate nucleotides, gyrktF (5′-GCTCGTGCTTTACCTGATGCTAGA-3′) and gyrktR (5′-AACGTTGTGCAGCAGGTCT-3′), was designed to increase the sensitivity of the gyrA assay. The PCR reagents, their concentrations, and the conditions for each assay are shown in Table 1. The specificities of each assay were evaluated using a panel of urogenital, commensal, and closely related organisms, namely, Candida albicans, Chlamydia trachomatis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, M. pneumoniae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Treponema pallidum, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 1.

Optimum PCR concentrations and conditions

Parameter Value
Master mix PCR reagent 23S rRNA parC gyrA gyrA2
    HotStarTaq master mix
    Forward primer (nM) 200 200 200 150
    Reverse primer (nM) 200 200 200 150
    MgCl2 (mM) 1 2 2 0
    DNA (10 μl) 1:10 1:100 1:10 1:10
Total vol (μl) 25 25 25 25
PCR step Temp (°C) Time No. of cycles
    Activation 95 10 min 1
    Denaturation 95 10 s 40
    Annealing a 30 s 40
    Extension 72 30 s 40
    Final 72 5 min 1
a

Annealing temperatures were 65°C for the 23S rRNA gene, 64°C for parC, 62°C for gyrA, and 61°C for gyrA2.

Amplified products were cleaned using illustra ExoStar 1-step PCR clean up solution (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) and were sequenced at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF), Westmead Millennium Institute (Westmead, Australia), on the Applied Biosystems 96-capillary 3730xl DNA analyzer (Life Technologies). FASTA sequences were aligned against the five M. genitalium complete genome sequences available in GenBank, i.e., for strains G37, M2288, M2321, M6282, and M6320 (GenBank accession no. NC_000908.2, CP003773.1, CP003770.1, CP003771.1, and CP003772.1, respectively; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and were analyzed using NCBI BLAST and UniPro UGENE 1.11 bioinformatics software (UniPro, Russia).

Patient information for clinical samples.

Samples were identified by unique patient-specific numbers, and the date and site of specimen collection were recorded for each. The laboratory database was searched to identify first and subsequent M. genitalium-positive specimens from individual patients. Only first-test-positive samples were used to estimate the prevalence of resistance, defined by the proportion of M. genitalium-infected patients who harbored resistant strains in their first samples.

Statistical tests were performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests to analyze the differences in the resistance-associated mutation rates between samples from different time periods (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

RESULTS

Alignment of the five M. genitalium complete genomes showed that, compared with G37, one strain (M6320) harbored an A2059G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene and is therefore likely to be resistant to azithromycin, and another strain (M6282) harbored both a silent mutation (C234T) and a missense mutation (C184T) in the QRDR of parC. The C234T mutation was also found commonly in our specimens (Table 2), but the significance of the C184T missense mutation is unknown. There were no other sequence differences between the five strains within the three amplified regions of interest, suggesting that the differences identified in our study specimens are significant.

Table 2.

Position and frequency of point mutations identified in each gene of interest

Gene Positiona Mutation Amino acid change No. of first samplesb (n = 143 for each gene) Frequency (%)b,c Reference no.d
23S rRNA
2071 (2058) A→C 1 0.7 25
A→G 21 14.7 25
A→T 2 1.4 30
2072 (2059) A→G 38 26.6 25
    Total 62/143 43.4
parC
234 C→T* No change 27* 18.9*
241 G→T Gly→Cys 81(78) 1 0.7 35
244 G→A Asp→Asn 82(79) 1 0.7 36
247 A→C Ser→Arg 83(80) 1 0.7 34
248 G→T Ser→Ile 83(80) 11 7.7 35
259 G→A Asp→Asn 87(84) 3 2.1 35
G→C Asp→His 87(84) 1 0.7 34
G→T Asp→Tyr 87(84) 2 1.4 34
260 A→G Asp→Gly 87(84) 1 0.7 35
307 G→Ae Val→Ile 103(100)e 1 0.7
351 T→C* No change 1* 0.7*
    Total 22/143 15.4
gyrA
237 G→T* No change 1* 0.7*
270 C→T* No change 1* 0.7*
285 G→A* No change 4* 2.8*
G→C Met→Ile 95(83) 1 0.7 35, 37
    Total 1/143 0.7
a

Position numbers are given according to the M. genitalium G37 genome (GenBank accession no. NC_000908.2). E. coli numbering is shown in parentheses.

b

Asterisks indicate mutations that were not included in the total due to lack of an amino acid change.

c

Frequencies are total number of mutations, irrespective of whether a mutation is associated with antibiotic resistance.

d

Reference for identification of the mutation associated with resistance at the same position in M. genitalium or a closely related organism.

e

Amino acid position not previously associated with antibiotic resistance.

Mutations identified in this study, and their resulting amino acid changes, are shown in Table 2. Four different mutations were identified in the 23S rRNA gene sequences at position 2058 or 2059 (E. coli numbering). Nine different missense mutations were identified in the QRDR of parC and one was identified in the QRDR of gyrA.

DNA extracts of C. albicans, C. trachomatis, G. vaginalis, M. hominis, M. pneumoniae, N. gonorrhoeae, T. vaginalis, T. pallidum, and U. urealyticum did not produce visible amplicons of any size in the 23S rRNA gene, parC, or gyrA assays.

Correlation of results and patient information.

The 186 positive samples tested in this study were from 149 patients, from whom only the initial samples were used to calculate mutation frequencies. Of these, 143 patients had results available for all three genes and were further analyzed. The gene mutation profiles of these 143 patients are shown in Table 3. Sixty-two patients (43.4%) harbored M. genitalium strains with 23S rRNA gene mutations, while 22 (15.4%) had parC (21 patients) or gyrA (one patient) mutations that resulted in amino acid changes at positions that have been previously associated with fluoroquinolone resistance (Table 2).

Table 3.

Mutation profiles identified in 143 first-test patient samples

Mutation profile Gene mutation
No. of patients
23S rRNA parC gyrA
Wild type 73
AZM mutation + 48
MXF mutation + 8
AZM+MXF mutation + + 13
AZM+MXF mutation + + 1

Between 2008 and 2010, M. genitalium PCR was performed only by physician request after multiple NGU treatment failures. From 2011, it was performed routinely on all specimens from patients with NGU. Therefore, we compared the mutation rates for the first specimens collected in these two periods separately, with the following results: for the 23S rRNA gene in 2008 to 2010, 35/68 (51.5%), compared to the rate in 2011, 27/75 (36.0%) (P = 0.06); for parC and gyrA (combined) in 2008 to 2010, 12/68 (17.6%), compared to the rate in 2011, 10/75 (13.3%) (P = 0.5).

Twenty-four patients had a second or subsequent PCR-positive sample available for testing, of whom 23 (95.8%) harbored a 23S rRNA gene mutant, including eight (34.8%) who had wild-type profiles in their first samples. One sample repeatedly showed an indeterminate A/G nucleotide at position 2058, potentially representing a mixed population of mutant and wild-type strains (30), but it was not analyzed further. A second PCR-positive sample was available for three (13.6%) of the 22 patients with potential fluoroquinolone resistance mutations, and all harbored the same mutation profile as the first.

DISCUSSION

Moxifloxacin resistance: parC and gyrA mutations.

For the first time in Sydney, Australia, the prevalence of M. genitalium strains that are potentially resistant to fluoroquinolones was estimated. By combining the number of mutations in parC and gyrA that have been previously linked to fluoroquinolone resistance, we estimated the prevalence of potentially resistant strains in Sydney sexual health clinics to be 15%. In 2011, when specimens were tested routinely, the rate was 13%; although lower, this result was not significantly different from that of the earlier period. This rate is similar to a recent estimate in Japan of 10% (n = 28) in clinical populations (34).

The parC missense mutations included in this estimate occurred at amino acid positions 78, 79, 80, and 84, which are all positions that are known to be associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in M. genitalium and other closely related organisms (3437). We did not perform susceptibility testing to confirm phenotypic resistance. However, based on previous studies, it is likely that these changes contribute to MXF resistance (34, 35). The amino acid changes Gly-78→Cys and Asp-79→Asn were demonstrated here for the first time in M. genitalium. They have been previously linked to fluoroquinolone resistance in M. pneumoniae and U. urealyticum, respectively (35, 36). To the best of our knowledge, the Val-100→Ile mutation identified in this study has not been linked to resistance in any closely related organisms. The only mutation identified in the QRDR of gyrA, Met-83→Ile, also has not been reported previously in M. genitalium. However, mutations at position 83, which is a “hot spot” for fluoroquinolone resistance (38), have been reported in MXF-resistant strains of M. pneumoniae, M. hominis, and Ureaplasma spp. (35, 37).

Without subtyping of these strains, it was not possible to determine whether the parC and gyrA mutants were the result of de novo mutation events that were then selected by the use of fluoroquinolones or were descendants of clonal mutant lineages. Nonetheless, the presence of these mutations in clinical strains of M. genitalium raises concerns about the potential for fluoroquinolone resistance to emerge in the community.

Azithromycin resistance: 23S rRNA gene mutations.

Identification of mutations in the 23S rRNA gene at nucleotides 2058 and 2059, positions known to be linked to high-level AZM resistance (25, 26), allowed for the first estimate of the prevalence of AZM resistance in M. genitalium in Sydney, Australia. The overall prevalence was 43%, with a lower prevalence in 2011 (36%) than in 2008 to 2010 (51%) (although the difference is not statistically different). Another recent estimate of M. genitalium resistance from Melbourne, Australia, was 19.5% (n = 82) (30), which is much lower than that found in this study, although both estimates demonstrate alarmingly high levels of M. genitalium AZM resistance in patients attending sexual health clinics.

High levels of resistance may be the result of frequent selection of resistant strains by a 1-g AZM dose (30), as several studies have shown that selection of resistant strains commonly occurs over the course of 1-g AZM treatment (25, 27, 29). Alarmingly, a very recent study reported that selection over the course of treatment accounted for 55% of AZM treatment failure cases (30). This is concerning, as mycoplasmas have a high mutation rate that is likely to rapidly generate mutants (3), thus allowing selection to occur at an accelerated rate (30). The continuing use of 1 g AZM to treat M. genitalium infections will increase the incidence of resistance (30), leaving us increasingly more reliant on MXF; this is a concerning fact, given that this study suggests the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Sydney.

As this is a retrospective study, there are both clinical and molecular limitations to consider. The estimated frequency of resistance was based on the assumption that patient first-test samples were collected before exposure to AZM or MXF; thus, the mutation rates are probably overestimated. We have attempted to reduce this overestimation by using only 2011 samples, since the 2011 testing protocol allowed sexual health clinics to test for M. genitalium upon first presentation of NGU or cervicitis, rather than after treatment failure. However, patients who were tested in 2011 may still have visited a general practitioner for treatment before presenting to a sexual health clinic for testing.

Molecular limitations are those that are commonly associated with retrospective studies, including DNA degradation in stored samples and the lack of original specimens for reextraction. DNA degradation could have been minimized by storing samples at −80°C (39). For future amplification of gyrA, we would recommend the more-sensitive gyrA2 assay, described for the first time in this study.

In future studies, cultures should be attempted with antibiotic susceptibility testing and subtyping of isolates to determine the resistance phenotypes of parC and gyrA mutants and whether they are de novo mutants or descendants of clonal mutant lineages. This would enable a better understanding of the most clinically relevant mutations. Furthermore, we did not test for other mechanisms of resistance, such as mobile genetic elements, but to the best of our knowledge, alternate resistance mechanisms have not been reported in M. genitalium (3).

In conclusion, this study provides the first estimate of potential MXF resistance in Sydney, Australia, to be 13% and identifies AZM resistance mutations in 36% of clinical samples of M. genitalium. How these mutant strains began to emerge in Sydney cannot be determined, although we can employ the knowledge gained from this study as the basis for review of NGU and cervicitis treatment protocols, to promote antibiotic stewardship, to monitor and limit the spread of resistance, and to reduce patient morbidity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by an NSW Health capacity building infrastructure grant to the CIDM-Public Health, Westmead, Australia, and Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.

We acknowledge Yasushi Shimada and Takashi Deguchi, who both kindly responded to queries regarding their published papers.

We certify that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 8 May 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fraser CM, Gocayne JD, White O, Adams MD, Clayton RA, Fleischmann RD, Bult CJ, Kerlavage AR, Sutton G, Kelley JM, Fritchman JL, Weidman JF, Small KV, Sandusky M, Fuhrmann J, Nguyen D, Utterback TR, Saudek DM, Phillips CA, Merrick JM, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Bott KF, Hu PC, Lucier TS, Peterson SN, Smith HO, Hutchison CA, III, Venter JC. 1995. The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270:397–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. 2011. Mycoplasma genitalium: from chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24:498–514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. 1998. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1094–1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tully JG, Taylor-Robinson D, Cole RM, Rose DL. 1981. A newly discovered Mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet i:1288–1291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Totten PA, Schwartz MA, Sjöström KE, Kenny GE, Handsfield HH, Weiss JB, Whittington WL. 2001. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with nongonococcal urethritis in heterosexual men. J. Infect. Dis. 183:269–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Horner PJ, Thomas BJ, Gilroy CB, Egger M, Taylor-Robinson D. 2001. Role of Mycoplasma genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum in acute and chronic nongonococcal urethritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:995–1003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Deguchi T, Maeda S. 2002. Mycoplasma genitalium: another important pathogen of nongonococcal urethritis. J. Urol. 167:1210–1217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gaydos C, Maldeis NE, Hardick A, Hardick J, Quinn TC. 2009. Mycoplasma genitalium as a contributor to the multiple etiologies of cervicitis in women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Sex. Transm. Dis. 36:598–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lusk MJ, Konecny P, Naing ZW, Garden FL, Cumming RG, Rawlinson WD. 2011. Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with cervicitis and HIV infection in an urban Australian STI clinic population. Sex. Transm. Infect. 87:107–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Uno M, Deguchi T, Komeda H, Hayasaki M, Iida M, Nagatani M, Kawada Y. 1997. Mycoplasma genitalium in the cervices of Japanese women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 24:284–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cohen CR, Manhart LE, Bukusi A, Astete SG, Brunham RC, Holmes KK, Sinei SK, Bwayo JJ, Totten PA. 2002. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium and acute endometritis. Lancet 359:765–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Simms I, Eastick K, Mallinson H, Thomas K, Gokhale R, Hay P, Herring A, Rogers PA. 2003. Associations between Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlamydia trachomatis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex. Transm. Infect. 79:154–156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. 2012. Mycoplasma genitalium in cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease among women at a gynecologic outpatient service. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206:476–478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. 2010. The association between Mycoplasma genitalium and pelvic inflammatory disease after termination of pregnancy. BJOG 117:361–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. McGowin CL, Anderson-Smits C. 2011. Mycoplasma genitalium: an emerging cause of sexually transmitted disease in women. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001324. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Couldwell DL, Gidding HF, Freedman EV, McKechnie ML, Biggs K, Sintchenko V, Gilbert GL. 2010. Ureaplasma urealyticum is significantly associated with non-gonococcal urethritis in heterosexual Sydney men. Int. J. STD AIDS 21:337–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Read TR, Garland SM, Hopkins CA, Moss LM, Fairley CK. 2006. Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J. Infect. Dis. 193:336–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Workowski KA, Berman S. 2010. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Recommend. Rep. 59(RR12):1–110 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jernberg E, Moghaddam A, Moi H. 2008. Azithromycin and moxifloxacin for microbiological cure of Mycoplasma genitalium infection: an open study. Int. J. STD AIDS 19:676–679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Björnelius E, Anagrius C, Bojs G, Carlberg H, Johannisson G, Johansson E, Moi H, Jensen JS, Lidbrink P. 2008. Antibiotic treatment of symptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infection in Scandinavia: a controlled clinical trial. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84:72–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fairley CK. 2008. Persistence of Mycoplasma genitalium following azithromycin treatment. PLoS One 3:e3618. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bradshaw CS, Jensen JS, Tabrizi SN, Read TRH, Garland SM, Hopkins CA, Moss LM, Fairley CK. 2006. Azithromycin failure in Mycoplasma genitalium urethritis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1149–1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bradshaw CS, Lim YM, Tabrizi SN, Twin J, Bush M, Garland SM, Fairley CK. 2010. The effectiveness of 1g of azithromycin for Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a five-year review. Paper no. 179. 2010 Australasian Sexual Health Conference, Sydney, Australia [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S, Seña AC, Martin DH, Lopez LM, Lensing S, Lee JY. 2011. Re-evaluating the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens–a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52:163–170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. 2008. Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:1546–1553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vester B, Douthwaite S. 2001. Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ito S, Shimada Y, Yamaguchi Y, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S, Nakano M, Ishiko H, Deguchi T. 2011. Selection of Mycoplasma genitalium strains harbouring macrolide resistance-associated 23S rRNA mutations by treatment with a single 1 g dose of azithromycin. Sex. Transm. Infect. 87:412–414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Shimada Y, Deguchi T, Nakane K, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito SI, Nakano M, Ito S, Ishiko H. 2011. Macrolide resistance-associated 23S rRNA mutation in Mycoplasma genitalium, Japan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:1148–1150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yew HS, Anderson T, Coughlan E, Werno A. 2011. Induced macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium isolates from patients with recurrent nongonococcal urethritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:1695–1696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Twin J, Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Garland SM, Fairley CK, Min LY, Tabrizi SN. 2012. Transmission and selection of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma genitalium infections detected by rapid high resolution melt analysis. PLoS One 7:e35593. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hamasuna R, Jensen JS, Osada Y. 2009. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Mycoplasma genitalium strains examined by broth dilution and quantitative PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4938–4939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bébéar CM, de Barbeyrac B, Pereyre S, Renaudin H, Clerc M, Bébéar C. 2008. Activity of moxifloxacin against the urogenital mycoplasmas Ureaplasma spp., Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:801–805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vila J, Ruiz J, Goñi P, De Anta MT. 1996. Detection of mutations in parC in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:491–493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Shimada Y, Deguchi T, Nakane K, Masue T, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S, Nakano M, Ishiko H. 2010. Emergence of clinical strains of Mycoplasma genitalium harbouring alterations in ParC associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 36:255–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gruson D, Pereyre S, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, Bébéar CM. 2005. In vitro development of resistance to six and four fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma hominis, respectively. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1190–1193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Beeton ML, Chalker VJ, Kotecha S, Spiller OB. 2009. Comparison of full gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE gene sequences between all Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum serovars to separate true fluoroquinolone antibiotic resistance mutations from non-resistance polymorphism. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64:529–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bébéar CM, Renaudin H, Charron A, Clerc M, Pereyre S, Bébéar C. 2003. DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV mutations in clinical isolates of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis resistant to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3323–3325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yoshida H, Bogaki M, Nakamura M, Nakamura S. 1990. Quinolone resistance-determining region in the DNA gyrase gyrA gene of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1271–1272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Carlsen KH, Jensen JS. 2010. Mycoplasma genitalium PCR: does freezing of specimens affect sensitivity? J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3624–3627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES