Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Jul 3;3:2128. doi: 10.1038/srep02128

Hollow Microporous Organic Capsules

Buyi Li 1,4, Xinjia Yang 1,4, Lingling Xia 1, Muhammad Irfan Majeed 1, Bien Tan 1,2,3,a
PMCID: PMC3699813  PMID: 23820511

Abstract

Fabrication of hollow microporous organic capsules (HMOCs) could be very useful because of their hollow and porous morphology, which combines the advantages of both microporous organic polymers and non-porous nanocapsules. They can be used as storage materials or reaction chambers while supplying the necessary path for the design of controlled uptake/release systems. Herein, the synthesis of HMOCs with high surface area through facile emulsion polymerization and hypercrosslinking reactions, is described. Due to their tailored porous structure, these capsules possessed high drug loading efficiency, zero-order drug release kinetics and are also demonstrated to be used as nanoscale reactors for the prepareation of nanoparticles (NPs) without any external stabilizer. Moreover, owing to their intrinsic biocompatibility and fluorescence, these capsules exhibit promising prospect for biomedical applications.

Porous materials have attracted considerable research interest for several years because of their widespread technological applications in gas storage1,2,3,4,5, separation6,7 and heterogeneous catalysis8,9,10. Recently microporous organic polymers (MOPs)11 have emerged as an important class of materials due to their high thermal and hydrothermal stabilities, which stem from the stronger covalent bonds, compared to extensively studied systems like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). In this regard, several kinds of MOPs, such as covalent organic frameworks (COFs)12,13, amorphous hyper-crosslinked polymers (HCPs)14,15,16,17, polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs)18 and conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs)19,20, have been investigated to control their pore size and the surface area. MOPs are usually formed by C-C coupling reactions, e.g., Sonogashira, Suzuki- or Yamamoto-coupling21, trimerization of ethynyl22 or nitrile groups23, by amide, imide or imine formation24,25,26, via ‘Click’ chemistry27,28 and oxidative polymerization29,30. Despite all these efforts, a little attention has been paid to control micro-morphology of MOPs and their subsequent applications. There are only a few reports of MOPs with nanoparticulate4,31 or a tubular morphology32. The HCPs nanoparticles accelerate the hydrogen adsorption rate and enhance the hydrogen storage capacity compared to their macro-analogues4. It is also possible to synthesize fluorescent CMP particles which may find their application in bio-imaging and sensing33. These findings demonstrate that the properties of MOPs are highly dependent on their morphology. Among diverse particle geometries, hollow capsules have recently received more attention. This interest is primarily fueled up due to their ability to confine the chemicals within their hollow cavities and their controlled release34,35, to serve as highly active nanoreactors36 and to keep metal nanoparticle catalysts isolated and avoid their ripening37 or poisoning38. In this regard, fabrication of hollow microporous organic capsules (HMOCs) could be very useful to broaden the scope of MOPs. Similarly nanocapsules of MOPs may also offer additional advantages due to their hollow and porous morphology. They may have their use as storage materials or reaction chambers while supplying the necessary path for the design of controlled uptake/release systems. Compared to other inorganic capsules, HMOCs have better tolerance to acid/alkali and are more compatible with the organic molecules39,40,41. Recently, Wu et al.42 have reported the preparation of the nanostructured porous network of MOPs. They used surface-initiated atom-transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) on the silica nanoparticles, followed by intra/inter-particle carbonyl crosslinking of polystyrene. However, their method is associated with some disadvantages especially being complicated, inter-particle cross-linking, and uncontrollable porous structure.

In this work, a facile traditional emulsion polymerization method was used to prepare SiO2@PS-DVB core-shell precursors, which were then hypercrosslinked followed by chemical etching of the sacrificial SiO2 cores to obtain HMOCs (Fig. 1). The hollow cavity and the shell thickness of these novel HMOCs can easily be controlled by varying the size of sacrificial SiO2 core and the dose of monomers used to form the polymer shell. The tunable microporous shell of HMOCs added an additional dimension to them and could be useful for various interesting applications.

Figure 1. Schematic synthetic route of hollow microporous organic capsules (HMOCs).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Results

SiO2@PS-DVB precursor nanoparticles

Silica nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) were synthesized through traditional Stöber method. The vinyl group of 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (MPS) grafted on the SiO2 NPs can react with monomers (styrene and DVB) to form macromolecular chains anchored on their surface, thus forming SiO2@PS-DVB core-shell structures43. Previously, we have demonstrated that the pore structure can be controlled from macro to microscale by changing the DVB contents44. Hence, to vary the porous structure of HMOCs, a series of precursor NPs (SiO2@PS-DVB) were prepared with different DVB contents (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10 and 15 wt.% of styrene). It was observed that co-monomer (DVB) has a significant effect on the core-shell morphology of SiO2@PS-DVB NPs (Fig. 2). The SiO2@PS-DVB NPs with 0.5, 1 and 2.5% DVB exhibited eccentric SiO2 cores, while the SiO2 cores in SiO2@PS-DVB NPs with 5, 10 and 15% DVB were centric. By increasing the DVB contents, the SiO2@PS-DVB tended to have concentric core –shell morphology. By decreasing the DVB contents were low, the PS chains were weakly crosslinked by DVB and the rigidity of the shell could not be balanced with the gravity of SiO2 core. Increasing the DVB content enhanced the rigidity of the shell, therefore the SiO2 spheres tended to be located in the center44.

Figure 2. TEM images of SiO2@PS core-shell precursors with different DVB contents.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) SiO2@PS-0.5% DVB, (b) SiO2@PS-1% DVB, (c) SiO2@PS-2.5% DVB, (d) SiO2@PS-5% DVB, (e) SiO2@PS-10% DVB, (f) SiO2@PS-15% DVB.Styrene is 10 ml. The SiO2 nanoparticles core is 130 nm. The mass of SiO2 nanoparticles is 1.2 g. The scale is 200 nm.

Hypercrosslinking reactions and hollow microporous organic capsules

After hypercrosslinking, sacrificial SiO2 cores were etched by hydrofluoric acid (HF). From TEM and SEM images of precursor (SiO2@PS-DVB) NPs (Fig. 2 and Fig. S1–S6) and hollow HMOCs (Fig. 3a to 3f and Fig. S7–S12) after hypercrosslinking and etching,it is obvious that HMOCs retained their original morphology after the removal of SiO2 cores. Low DVB contents (0.5 wt.%) led to the formation of HMOCs with rough surface. This might be due the low degree of crosslinking resulting in the twisting of some macromolecular chains leading to the rough surface. Shell's surface became smooth when the DVB content was up to 1 wt.% or higher. These observations are in consistence with the previous reports44. The HMOCs with varying size of hollow cavities and different shell thickness were obtained as expected. In order to obtain the HMOCs with different shell thickness, the dose of styrene was varied from 2.5 to 15 ml for the synthesis of SiO2@PS-DVB nanoparticles with ~130 nm SiO2 cores (S15–S18). The TEM images of HMOCs after hypercrosslinking and etching are shown in Fig. 3g to 3j. It was observed that the resulting particle size (including core and shell) and shell thickness (excluding core) increased with a decrease in initial emulsifier to monomer ratio which was consistent with the dominant micellar nucleation mechanism proposed by Harkins45. According to this mechanism, a decrease in the initial emulsifier to monomer ratio decreases the relative amount of micelles which in turn decreases the number of polymer particle nuclei formed early in the reaction per unit time resulting in formation of polymer particles with smaller in numbers but larger in size4. It was also possible to change the size of hollow cavities of HMOCs (Fig. 3k and 3l) by using SiO2 cores with different sizes (e.g. 200 nm, Fig. S19 and S20). The mass of SiO2 nanoparticles is 1.2 g.

Figure 3. TEM images of HMOCs obtained after hypercrosslinking of SiO2@PS core-shell precursors with different DVB content and etching SiO2 core.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) 0.5% - HMOCs, (b) 1% - HMOCs, (c) 2.5% - HMOCs, (d) 5% - HMOCs, (e) 10% - HMOCs, (f) 15% - HMOCs.Styrene is 10 ml with 130 nm hollow cavities. TEM images of HMOCs with different thickness of the shell by varying the dose of styrene in SiO2@PS core-shell precursors, (g) 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml, (h) 10% - HMOCs - 5 ml, (i) 10% - HMOCs -10 ml, (j) 10% - HMOCs - 15 ml with 130 nm hollow cavities. TEM image of HMOCs with 200 nm hollow cavities. (k) 10% - HMOCs - 5 ml–200 nm, (l) 10% - HMOCs - 10 ml–200 nm. The mass of SiO2 nanoparticles is 1.2 g. The scale is 200 nm.

Surface areas and porous structures

It is clearly evident from the TEM images that the size of hollow cavity of HMOCs and their shell thickness can easily be tuned. However, the microporous structure of their shell cannot be observed by these imaging techniques. Nitrogen gas adsorption and desorption experiment were, therefore, employed to confirm their microporous structure. The BET surface area, Langmuir surface area, and pore volume are summarized in Table 1 and Table S1. It is clearly evident that by increasing the DVB contents, the surface area of HMOCs decreases, which can be attributed to the decrease in the hypercrosslinking of styrene. The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were obtained at 77.3 K (Fig. 4a) and pore size distribution of HMOCs with various DVB contents was calculated using DFT methods (slit pore models, differential pore volume vs pore width, Fig. 4b). As shown in Fig. 4a, the nitrogen adsorption isotherms of all HMOCs exhibit a steep rise at low relative pressure (P/P0 < 0.001), reflecting the abundance of microporous structure, while a steep rise at high pressure (P/P0 = 1) may be due to the macropores formed as interstitial voids between the highly aggregated capsules and their hollow interior46. Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms of HMOCs with 0.5% to 5% DVB have clear hysteresis loop which indicates the mesoporous structure of capsules shell46. The pore size distribution (Fig. 4b) also shows the presence of micropores, mesopores and macropores in the materials simultaneously. With increasing the DVB contents to 10 and 15%, the hysteresis loop disappears and becomes flat in the intermediate section, which suggests that the mesoporous structure is diminished with an increase in DVB contents. Since, there are no peaks in the mesoporous region of pore size distribution curves, it indicates a sheer microporous structure of the capsule shell46. With an increase in DVB contents, in addition to the disappearance of mesoporous structure, smaller micropores are also formed as it is evident from obvious shift of the peaks to the lower value in pore size distribution curves in the region below 2 nm (Fig. 4b). As shown in Table 1, pore volume of HMOCs reduces gradually with an increase of DVB content, which also demonstrates the transformation of the mesopores to the micropores.

Table 1. Surface area and porosity of HMOCs.

Samples DVB % SBET[a] m2/g SL[b] m2/g M.A.[c] m2/g PV[d] cm3/g M.P.V.[e] cm3/g M.A.[f] %
0.5% - HMOCs 0.5 1129 1549 361 0.98 0.15 32.0
1% - HMOCs 1 815 1098 496 0.61 0.22 60.8
2.5% - HMOCs 2.5 697 932 431 0.59 0.20 61.8
5% - HMOCs 5 589 788 407 0.42 0.19 69.1
10% - HMOCs 10 516 691 351 0.35 0.16 68.0
15% - HMOCs 15 478 640 296 0.35 0.14 61.9
10% - Solid HCPs 10 616 829 - 0.83 - -
Open in a new tab

[a]Surface area calculated from nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77.3 K using BET equation.

[b]Surface area calculated from nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77.3 K using Langmuir equation.

[c]t-Plot micropore area.

[d]Pore volume calculated from nitrogen isotherm at P/P0 = 0.995, 77.3 K.

[e]t-Plot micropore volume.

[f]t-Plot micropore area./BET surface area*100%.

Figure 4. (a) Nitrogen sorption isotherms at 77.3 K and (b) pore distribution of pore size calculated using DFT methods (slit pore models, differential pore volumes) of HMOCs with 130 nm hollow cavity.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Discussion

HMOCs were also evaluated for their possible potential biomedical applications. Prior to that, the toxicity of HMOCs was investigated through an MTT assay, and cell viability of HepG2 cells was determined in the presence of HMOCs (Fig. S21). HMOCs showed almost no cytotoxicity over the range of concentrations studied (0, 15.6, 62.5, 125, 250 and 500 μg/mL). As HMOCs are around 250 nm in diameter, usually they will be sequestered by phagocytotic cells of the spleen and eliminated from the body eventually47. Interestingly, these HMOCs were also found to be fluorescent, which may be useful for their applications in bio-imaging and bio-labeling. The origin of fluorescence in these HMOCs is not clear yet but it may be due the stacking of benzene rings and nanoscale size effect. The optical images of HMOCs under UV light in simulated body fluid (PBS, pH = 7.4, buffer solution) are shown in Fig. S22. The emission spectra of HMOCs (Fig. S23–S28) indicate the emission peak at 590 nm when excited at 440 nm. In order to evaluate their application in a drug delivery system, in vitro drug loading and release experiments were performed with HMOCs having different pore structures using ibuprofen (IBU) as a model drug. Loading of the drug was achieved in IBU hexane solution, and the drug release rate was obtained by soaking the drug-loaded HMOCs in simulated body fluid (PBS, pH = 7.4, buffer solution). The drug loading efficiency of HMOCs was calculated from the data obtained with UV-vis spectrophotometric and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. In Fig. S29–S39, the weight loss at and above 450°C corresponds to the decomposition of HMOCs itself. But prior to that, the weight loss observed in the range of 180–230°C can be attributed due to the removal of IBU. As summarized in Table S2, HMOCs can uptake 1.68 to 2.04 g of ibuprofen/g, which is much higher than that (0.80 g of ibuprofen/g) achieved for solid HCP nanoparticles prepared in the absence of silica core via similar synthesis process. The 10% -solid HCPs possess higher surface area (616 m2/g) than that (516 m2/g) of 10% - HMOCs, but much lower drug uptake (0.84 g of ibuprofen/g) than that of 10% - HMOCs (1.85 g of ibuprofen/g), which indicates the entrapment of drug inside the hollow cavity of HMOCs. The surface area of 10% - HMOCs was found to be lower than that of 10% - solid HCPs, which may be due to an extra internal surface of 10% - HMOCs for being hollow. Moreover, the benzene rings present on the external and internal surfaces of precursor shell cannot been hypercrosslinked as effectively as those present inside the precursor shell4. The drug release profile (Fig. 5) indicates that the porous structure of shell also affects the drug release kinetics. The shell of 0.5% - HMOCs to 5% - HMOCs possess meso- and microporous structure and their drug release kinetics fit for the first order model. This model indicates that the release mechanism of ibuprofen is mainly controlled by the simple diffusion. HMOCs release the drug at a rate which is proportional to the amount of drug remaining in its interior48. However the shells of 10 and 15% - HMOCs are almost pure microporous and their drug release kinetics fit well for zero order model. As shown in Fig. S40, the molecular size of ibuprofen is up to 10.285 Å which is smaller than the pore size of 10 and 15% - HMOCs.

Figure 5. Drug release profile of (a) 0.5% - HMOCs, (b) 1% - HMOCs, (c) 2.5% - HMOCs, (d) 5% - HMOCs, (e) 10% - HMOCs, (f) 15% - HMOCs.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Red line is fitting line.

The micropores are more confined in comparison to mesopores and thus they restrict the free diffusion of drug molecules resulting in a constant drug release rate for 10% - HMOCs and 15% - HMOCs with sheer microporous structure. The constant release rate makes the drug amount in blood stable which is an ideal situation for clinical therapy. Compared to the MOFs such as MIL-5349 and MIL-10150, which have been studied as drug carriers, HMOCs exhibit a higher release rate. But the release behavior of HMOCs is close to that of another microporous organic polymer PAF-651 which is the first microporous organic material reported for drug delivery. Although the literature for microporous organic materials for drug delivery is very limited, drug release data of HMOCs still describes their promising prospect as an alternative choice for drug delivery due to their high drug loading efficiency and controlled drug release through adjustable micropore size.

The HMOCs have uniform hollow cores, which can be used as nanoscale reactors to change the composition within the hollow core. For example, herein we have demonstrated it through the synthesis of 5 nm Fe3O4 magnetic NPs via 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml as shown in Fig. 6a. Fe3O4 NPs were formed through co-precipitation of iron precursors (FeCl2 and FeCl3), absorbed within the restricted space of hollow cores, using ammonia as precipitator and without using any other external stabilizer. The superparamagnetic properties of 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml - Fe3O4 NPs, as shown in the Fig. 6b, also prove the existence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles inside the HMOCs52. After soaking in PBS for 2 days, the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles loaded HMOCs were maintained, which indicates the confinement of Fe3O4 nanoparticles within HMOCs cavities. It also implies that the HMOCs- Fe3O4 NPs can retain magnetic properties in body fluid. Interestingly, 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml -Fe3O4 NPs also showed high drug uptake (2.04 of ibuprofen/g) and zero order kinetic model for drug release (Fig. S41), similar to 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml (2.06 of ibuprofen/g, Fig. S42). The super-paramagnetic properties of 10% - HMOCs-2.5 ml-Fe3O4 NPs were also maintained after drug loading, promising their potential application in the development of magnetically controlled drug delivery systems.

Figure 6. (a) TEM image of 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml - Fe3O4 NPs;(b) 300 K magnetization isotherms of 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml - Fe3O4 NPs, (red line) 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml - Fe3O4 NPs after soaked in PBS for 48 h (blue line) and 10% - HMOCs - 2.5 ml - Fe3O4 NPs loaded with drug (green line).

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

In summary, we have demonstrated the synthesis of a family of hollow microporous organic capsules (HMOCs). Successful efforts were made to precisely control the size of hollow cavities, shell thickness as well as the porous shell structure of these HMOCs. The importance of microporous structure in a new dimension has been demonstrated. Moreover, the multifunctional HMOCs possessing zero order drug release kinetics, fluorescence and super-paramagnetic properties, indicate their attractive applications in medical field. The development of synthetic routes to nanostructured MOPs may receive more scientific attention due to their attractive applications in heterogeneous catalysis and separation technologies.

Methods

Preparation of hollow microporous hollow capsules (HMOCs)

The synthesis protocols for silica nanoparticles are based on the Stöber method. The detailed synthesis procedures for HMOCs are given in the Supplementary information.

Utilization of HMOCs as Confined Microreactors

The HMOCs were dispersed in 0.4 M FeCl3 and 0.2 M FeCl2 aqueous solution. These HMOCs were separated by centrifugation and redispersed in toluene and then mixed with ammonia water, to obtain nanoscale magnetic particles inside the hollow cavity.

Drug loading and release

A typical procedure for the loading of ibuprofen in HMOCs is as follows: 150 mg of HMOCs were suspended in 5 ml of 90 mg/ml ibuprofen solution in hexane under stirring for 96 h in a closed container to avoid the evaporation of hexane. The drug-loaded sample was then separated from the solution by vacuum filtration, washed with hexane, and dried at room temperature. The drug-loaded samples (200 mg) were then transferred to semipermeable bag, and the drug release rate was determined by soaking the drug-loaded samples in 100 ml of simulated body fluid (PBS, pH = 7.4, buffer solution, 37°C) at pre-determined time intervals, 3 ml samples were withdrawn periodically for analysis and the remaining suspension replenished with an equal volume i.e., 3 mL of PBS immediately. Samples were analyzed for ibuprofen content at 263 nm using UV-Vis spectrophometer.

Author Contributions

B.L. and X.Y. synthesized and characterized the HMOCs. X.L. performed the drug release experiments. B.T., B. L. and M. I. M. discussed the results and prepared the manuscript. B.T. conceived the project.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supporting information

srep02128-s1.pdf (7.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Analysis and Testing Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology for their assistance in characterization of materials. This work was financially supported by the program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0389), the Graduates' Innovation Fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HF-11-07-2013), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51173058/51273074).

References

  1. Furukawa H. & Yaghi O. M. Storage of Hydrogen, Methane, and Carbon Dioxide in Highly Porous Covalent Organic Frameworks for Clean Energy Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8875–8883 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McKeown N. B. et al. Towards Polymer-Based Hydrogen Storage Materials: Engineering Ultramicroporous Cavities within Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 118, 1836–1839 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wood C. D. et al. Microporous organic polymers for methane storage. Adv. Mater. 20, 1916–1921 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. Li B., Huang X., Liang L. & Tan B. Synthesis of uniform microporous polymer nanoparticles and their applications for hydrogen storage. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 7444–7450 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Holst J. R. & Cooper A. I. Ultrahigh Surface Area in Porous Solids. Adv. Mater. 22, 5212–5216 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKeown N. B. & Budd P. M. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): organic materials for membrane separations, heterogeneous catalysis and hydrogen storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 675–683 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li B., Su F., Luo H.-K., Liang L. & Tan B. Hypercrosslinked microporous polymer networks for effective removal of toxic metal ions from water. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 138, 207–214 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. Du X. et al. Troger's base-functionalised organic nanoporous polymer for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Commun. 46, 970–972 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dang D., Wu P., He C., Xie Z. & Duan C. Homochiral Metal−Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14321–14323 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li B. et al. Highly Dispersed Pd Catalyst Locked in Knitting Aryl Network Polymers for Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reactions of Aryl Chlorides in Aqueous Media. Adv. Mater. 24, 3390–3395 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiang J. X. & Cooper A. Microporous Organic Polymers: Design, Synthesis, and Function. Vol. 293, (Ed.: Schröder M.), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 1. (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Cote A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Kaderi H. M. et al. Designed Synthesis of 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks. Science 316, 268–272 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Germain J., Frechet J. M. J. & Svec F. Nanoporous, hypercrosslinked polypyrroles: effect of crosslinking moiety on pore size and selective gas adsorption. Chem. Commun. 1526–1528 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Germain J., Frechet J. M. J. & Svec F. Hypercrosslinked polyanilines with nanoporous structure and high surface area: potential adsorbents for hydrogen storage. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 4989–4997 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. Tsyurupa M. P. & Davankov V. A. Porous structure of hypercrosslinked polystyrene: State-of-the-art mini-review. React. Funct. Polym. 66, 768–779 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. Li B. et al. A New Strategy to Microporous Polymers: Knitting Rigid Aromatic Building Blocks by External Cross-Linker. Macromolecules 44, 2410–2414 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  18. Budd P. M. et al. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): robust, solution-processable, organic nanoporous materials. Chem. Commun. 230–231 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang J.-X. et al. Conjugated Microporous Poly(aryleneethynylene) Networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 1167 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang J. X. et al. Synthetic Control of the Pore Dimension and Surface Area in Conjugated Microporous Polymer and Copolymer Networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7710–7720 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dawson R., Cooper A. I. & Adams D. J. Nanoporous organic polymer networks. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37, 530–563 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Yuan S. W. et al. Microporous polyphenylenes with tunable pore size for hydrogen storage. Chem. Commun. 46, 4547–4549 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuhn P., Antonietti M. & Thomas A. Porous, Covalent Triazine-Based Frameworks Prepared by Ionothermal Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 3450–3453 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weber J., Antonietti M. & Thomas A. Microporous networks of high-performance polymers: Elastic deformations and gas sorption properties. Macromolecules 41, 2880–2885 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Pandey P. et al. Imine-Linked Microporous Polymer Organic Frameworks. Chem. Mater. 22, 4974–4979 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Uribe-Romo F. J. et al. A Crystalline Imine-Linked 3-D Porous Covalent Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4570–4571 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Holst J. R., Stöckel E., Adams D. J. & Cooper A. I. High Surface Area Networks from Tetrahedral Monomers: Metal-Catalyzed Coupling, Thermal Polymerization, and “Click” Chemistry. Macromolecules 43, 8531–8538 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. Pandey P. et al. A "click-based" porous organic polymer from tetrahedral building blocks. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 1700–1703 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmidt J., Weber J., Epping J. D., Antonietti M. & Thomas A. Microporous Conjugated Poly(thienylene arylene) Networks. Adv. Mater. 21, 702–705 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen Q. et al. Microporous Polycarbazole with High Specific Surface Area for Gas Storage and Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6084–6087 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang X. et al. Magnetic microporous polymer nanoparticles. Polym. Chem. 4, 1425–1429 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  32. Chun J. et al. Tubular-Shape Evolution of Microporous Organic Networks. Chem. Mater. 24, 3458–3463 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  33. Patra A., Koenen J.-M. & Scherf U. Fluorescent nanoparticles based on a microporous organic polymer network: fabrication and efficient energy transfer to surface-bound dyes. Chem. Commun. 47, 9612 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang X. & Brinker C. J. Aerosol-Assisted Self-Assembly of Single-Crystal Core/Nanoporous Shell Particles as Model Controlled Release Capsules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 4512–4513 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Quan B., Nam G.-E., Choi H. J. & Piao Y. Synthesis of Monodisperse Hollow Carbon Nanocapsules by Using Protective Silica Shells. Chem-Asian J. 8, 765–760 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanlés-Sobrido M., Pérez-Lorenzo M., Rodríguez-González B., Salgueiriño V. & Correa-Duarte M. A. Highly Active Nanoreactors: Nanomaterial Encapsulation Based on Confined Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 3877–3882 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Arnal P. M., Comotti M. & Schüth F. High-Temperature-Stable Catalysts by Hollow Sphere Encapsulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 8224–8227 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shi J., Li X., Wang Q., Zhang Y. & Tang Y. Platinum-encapsulated zeolitically microcapsular catalyst for one-pot dynamic kinetic resolution of phenylethylamine. J. Catal. 291, 87–94 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  39. Fontanals N. et al. Synthesis of Davankov-Type Hypercrosslinked Resins Using Different Isomer Compositions of Vinylbenzyl Chloride Monomer, and Application in the Solid-Phase Extraction of Polar Compounds. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 43, 1718–1728 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  40. Ahn J. H. et al. Rapid Generation and Control of Microporosity, Bimodal Pore Size Distribution, and Surface Area in Davankov-Type Hyper-Cross-Linked Resins. Macromolecules 39, 627–632 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  41. Caruso F. Modern Techniques for Nano- and Microreactors/-reactions. (Springer, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu D. et al. Nanoporous Polystyrene and Carbon Materials with Core–Shell Nanosphere-Interconnected Network Structure. Macromolecules 44, 5846–5849 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang K. et al. Monodisperse Silica-Polymer Core-Shell Microspheres via Surface Grafting and Emulsion Polymerization. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 288, 380–385 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  44. Li B., Gong R., Luo Y. & Tan B. Tailoring the pore size of hypercrosslinked polymers. Soft Matter 7, 10910–10916 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  45. Harkins W. D. A General Theory of the Mechanism of Emulsion Polymerization1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69, 1428–1444 (1947). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sing K. S. W. et al. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure & Appl. Chem. 57, 603–619 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen L.-T. & Weiss L. The Role of the Sinus Wall in the Passage of Erythrocytes Through the Spleen. Blood 41, 529–537 (1973). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Costa P. & Sousa Lobo J. M. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 13, 123–133 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Horcajada P. et al. Flexible Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks for a Controlled Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6774–6780 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Horcajada P. et al. Metal–Organic Frameworks as Efficient Materials for Drug Delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5974–5978 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhao H. et al. Targeted synthesis of a 2D ordered porous organic framework for drug release. Chem. Commun. 47, 6389–6391 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu X. & Asher S. A. Synthesis and Utilization of Monodisperse Hollow Polymeric Particles in Photonic Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7940–7945 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supporting information

srep02128-s1.pdf (7.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES