Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2013 May 5;23(3):169–177. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120116

Prevalence of Physical Activity Among Adults in a Metropolitan Nigerian City: A Cross-Sectional Study

Adewale L Oyeyemi 1, Adetoyeje Y Oyeyemi 1, Zainab A Jidda 1, Fatima Babagana 1
PMCID: PMC3700262  PMID: 23604060

Abstract

Background

Baseline information on physical activity is relevant to controlling the epidemic of chronic noncommunicable diseases occurring in many African countries. However, standardized data on physical activity are lacking in Nigeria. We assessed the prevalence of physical activity and its relationships with sociodemographic characteristics in a subnational sample of Nigerian adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a representative sample of 934 adults (age, 20–82 years) living in metropolitan Maiduguri, Nigeria. Physical activity was measured using the validated Nigerian version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Hausa IPAQ-SF). Using the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline, participants were classified as sufficiently active or insufficiently active. Sociodemographic correlates of sufficient physical activity were identified using multinomial logistic regression.

Results

Overall, 68.6% of Nigerian adults were sufficiently active. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in prevalence of physical activity between men (68.0%) and women (69.3%), but physical activity tended to decrease with increasing age category, especially among men. Physical activity prevalence was positively associated with being married (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.04–4.37) and blue collar work (OR = 2.19, CI = 1.16–4.12) and negatively associated with car ownership (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.17–0.86) and higher income (OR = 0.54, CI = 0.10–0.95).

Conclusions

The prevalence of physical activity varied between sociodemographic subgroups of Nigerian adults; thus, public health policies and interventions based on ecologic models of health behaviors may be warranted in promoting physical activity in Nigeria.

Key words: physical activity, sociodemographic characteristics, IPAQ, Nigerian adults

INTRODUCTION

Physical activity is an important determinant of health and is associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, obesity, and certain form of cancers.1 About 2 million deaths per year are attributable to physical inactivity worldwide, and more than 80% of deaths from chronic diseases occur in developing countries.1,2 The nutritional, lifestyle, and socioeconomic transitions occurring in many developing countries have significantly increased the burden of chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in the region (including in Nigeria and other African countries).1,3 In addition, rapid urbanization and its attendant unhealthy dietary habits and reduced physical activity have been linked to the epidemiologic transition from infectious communicable diseases to chronic NCDs in the African continent.4

Data on physical activity in developing African countries are needed in order to effectively formulate policies and programs that prevent chronic conditions and NCDs.5 Recently, comparable data on physical activity prevalence in many African countries, excluding Nigeria, were published.5,6 The prevalence rates of physical activity in the studied African countries varied widely, although the reasons for these variations were not obvious. For example, the prevalence of physical inactivity was reported to be 52.6%, 49.1%, and 44.7% in Mauritania, Swaziland, and South Africa, respectively, but was as low as 7.8%, 8.4%, and 8.8% in Burkina Faso, Malawi, and Ghana, respectively.6 Similarly, Mozambique and Malawi, in southeastern Africa, had the highest reported prevalence of physical activity (around 95%), whereas Mali and Mauritania, 2 sub-Saharan West African countries, were reported to have a prevalence of about 50%.5 Examining country-specific population-based data on physical activity prevalence may be necessary to identify promising interventions that are appropriate to the local environment, especially in Nigeria, where such data are scarce.

With a population of more than 140 million,7 Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, and physical inactivity-related NCDs are reported to be increasing.4,8 Thus, the need for baseline national or subnational data on physical activity for surveillance is urgent. Such information could help to identify populations and subgroups at risk of physical inactivity-related morbidity and mortality in Nigeria. Empirical data on physical activity prevalence could be used by governments to formulate policies and programs aimed at controlling the increase in NCDs.9,10 In this study, we assessed the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of physical activity in a subnational sample of adults in Maiduguri, Nigeria.

METHODS

Setting

Maiduguri is the largest city and capital of Borno State, in northeastern Nigeria. It has an estimated population of 749 123, and consists of Kanuri, Shuwa Arabs, Hausa, Fulani, and other ethnic groups.7,11 Borno State covers an area of 72 609 square kilometers (population density, 57 people/square kilometer) and attracts immigrants from the Republic of Cameroon, Republic of Niger, and Republic of Chad.7,12 The diverse inhabitants of Maiduguri predominantly use the Hausa language as a common means of communication and commercial activities.11 The Figure shows a map indicating the location of Maiduguri.

Figure. Map of Nigeria showing city of Maiduguri. ● Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Figure.

Participants and design

Multistage probability cluster sampling was used to recruit 934 adults from different households in Maiduguri Metropolitan Council. Using the international guidelines for conducting community surveys,13 7 of the 15 political wards into which Maiduguri Metropolitan Council is divided were randomly selected by lottery (stage 1). In each of the 7 selected wards, 2 enumeration areas per ward were randomly selected, for a total of 14 enumeration areas (stage 2). For each of the selected enumeration areas, houses were numbered on-site, and every odd-numbered house was approached, to determine study interest and eligibility (stage 3). Participants were invited to participate in the study if they met the following eligibility criteria: (1) residence in the identified household, (2) age older than 19 years, (3) absence of any disability that prevented walking, and (4) ability to complete or understand a survey in the English or Hausa language.

Sample size was calculated using Daniel’s formula for prevalence studies.14 Using an effect size [d] of 0.05 and a design effect of 3 (based on sampling),15 we determined that 1152 participants were needed to estimate the population prevalence of physical activity with good precision.14 A total of 1400 adults (100 per enumeration area) were contacted for the study in a door-to-door house survey, but only 934 (age range, 20–84 years) consented and provided a complete and usable survey, yielding a response rate of 66.7% (934/1400). A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data between March and May 2011. The study questionnaire was administered by interview, and the English language was used for participants who did not understand Hausa. All participants provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria (ADM/TH/EC/75; 21/01/2011).

Physical activity measure

Information on physical activity behaviors was collected with the Nigerian version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (Hausa IPAQ-SF). A detailed description of the development of the Nigerian version of the IPAQ-SF is available elsewhere.16 Briefly, the original English IPAQ-SF was culturally adapted by a panel of experts, translated into Hausa by 2 independent translators, synthesized by a panel of 6 experts (including the translators), back-translated by another 2 translators, and subsequently subjected to expert committee review and pretesting. The final product, the Hausa IPAQ-SF, is available in both Hausa and English (eQuestionnaire). The English edition of the Hausa IPAQ-SF was used for participants (n = 63) in the present study who did not understand Hausa. The Hausa IPAQ-SF included 7 items, estimated the time spent being physically active in the last 7 days, and measured vigorous-intensity activities, moderate-intensity activities (not including walking), walking, and sitting time. These activity categories can be treated separately to obtain the activity pattern or may be multiplied by their estimated intensity in METs and summed to gain an overall estimate of PA in a week (www.ipaq.ki.se). One MET represents the energy expended while sitting quietly at rest and is equivalent to 3.5 ml/kg/min of VO2.17 The MET intensities used to score IPAQ in this study were vigorous (8 METs), moderate (4 METs), and walking (3.3 METs) (www.ipaq.ki.se).

Physical activity levels were initially classified as low, moderate, or high intensity, defined by the IPAQ core group (http://www.ipaq.ki.se) as follows: Low—no activity or some activity reported, but not enough to satisfy the requirements of the other activity categories; Moderate—any of the following 3 criteria: (a) 3 or more days of vigorous-intensity activity for at least 20 minutes per day, (b) 5 or more days of moderate-intensity activity or waking for at least 30 minutes per day, or (c) 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity, or vigorous-intensity activities achieving a minimum of 600 MET-minutes per week; High—either of the following 2 criteria: (a) 3 or more days of vigorous-intensity activity accumulating at least 1500 MET-minutes per week or (b) 7 days of any combination of walking or moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities achieving a minimum of 3000 MET-minutes per week.

These 3 groups were then categorized as sufficiently physically active or physically inactive. The sufficiently physically active group included participants in the moderate- or high-intensity categories who met the WHO physical activity recommendation. According to the new WHO global standard, satisfying the recommendations for healthy physical activity was defined as engaging in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week, 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week, or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity.18 The test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.33–0.73) and concurrent validity (ρ = 0.78–0.92) of the Hausa version of the IPAQ-SF in Nigeria were found to be good.16 Acceptable test–retest reliability (r = 0.70–0.97) and criterion validity (r = 0.23), as compared with accelerometer monitoring, has been reported for the IPAQ in both developed and developing countries.19

Sociodemographic characteristics

Sociodemographic information on age, sex, ethnic group, marital status, household motor vehicle ownership, income, education level, and occupation was elicited from participants. Participant age was grouped into 5 categories: 20 to 34 years, 35 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years, and 55 years or older. Marital status was classified as single/never married, married, and divorced/separated. Education level was classified as more than secondary school education, secondary school education, and less than secondary school education. Occupation was categorized into 3 groups: white collar (office worker), blue collar (artisan, trader, farmer, etc.), and not employed (homemaker, student, retired, or unable to work). Participant income was classified into 4 groups: less than 15 000, 16 000 to 45 000, 46 000 to 90 000 and greater than 90 000 naira/month (15 000 naira is approximately 100 US dollars). Tribe was classified as Hausa/Fulani, Kanuri/Shuwa, Yoruba, Ibo, or other, and household motor vehicle ownership was classified as yes or no.

Statistical analyses

The cluster sampling design was taken into account during analyses by using information on primary sampling units (PSUs), sampling weights for participants, and finite population correction. The complex sample survey capabilities of SPSS were used to analyze the data, after specifying that there were 7 strata and that the PSUs in these strata were households.20,21 The sampling weights used to adjust for probability of selection during sampling were computed using the process described by Lameshow and colleagues.21 All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Estimates of the prevalence of physical activity and other categorical variables were reported as proportions with 95% CIs. Continuous variables such as age were reported as mean (SEM). The χ2 test was used to compare physically active and inactive participants relative to sociodemographic characteristics, and the significance level was defined as a P value less than 0.05. Multinomial logistic regression analysis with adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs was used to assess associations of physical activity with sociodemographic variables. ORs with 95% CIs were calculated against the reference category of participants aged 20 to 34 years, those who were single/never married, those with more than a secondary school education (higher education), those in a white collar occupation, those without a car in their household, and those earning less than 15 000 naira/month. Adjustment was made for all studied variables. We did not analyze multinomial logistic models separately for each sex, due to the relatively small sample size and to avoid a suppression effect.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of physical activity and inactivity among participants. The sample comprised 395 (42.3%) women and 539 (57.7%) men with a mean (SEM) age of 38.1 (1.7) years. Prevalence of physical activity was 68.6%, and about one-third of participants (31.4%) were physically inactive. Participants with less than a secondary school education were significantly more physically active (76.7%) than those with a secondary school education (66.5%) and those with more than a secondary school education (60.9%). Physical activity was significantly greater among those who had blue collar jobs (artisan, trader) than among those with white collar jobs and those who were not employed (homemaker, student, retired, or unable to work). Participants who did not own a car (77.9%) were significantly more physically active than those who did (57.6%). The highest prevalence rates of physical activity were among participants who were divorced/separated (80.4%), those without a car (77.4%), those with a blue collar job (76.6%), those with less than a secondary education (76.6%), and those with the lowest income (72.6%).

Table 1. Prevalence of physical activity overall, by participant sociodemographic characteristics (n = 934).

  na (%) na = 640 na = 294 P valueb

% physical activity (95% CI) % physical inactivity (95% CI)
All 934 (100.0) 68.6 (46.6–84.5) 31.4 (15.5–53.4)  
Sex       0.753
 Women 394 (42.1) 69.3 (48.9–84.1) 30.7 (15.9–51.1)  
 Men 540 (57.9) 68.0 (44.1–85.2) 32.0 (14.8–55.9)  
Age group       0.735
 20–34 years 441 (47.2) 72.4 (33.6–94.9) 27.6 (5.1–66.4)  
 35–44 years 240 (25.7) 72.6 (40.7–92.1) 27.4 (7.9–59.3)  
 45–54 years 140 (15.0) 69.8 (13.4–97.2) 30.2 (2.8–86.6)  
 ≥55 years 113 (12.1) 60.9 (34.2–82.3) 39.1 (17.7–65.8)  
Marital status       0.078
 Single 189 (20.3) 59.6 (29.8–83.6) 40.4 (16.4–70.2)  
 Married 666 (71.3) 69.7 (46.5–85.9) 30.3 (14.1–53.5)  
 Divorced 79 (8.4) 80.4 (48.2–94.7) 19.6 (5.3–51.8)  
Ethnic group       0.352
 Hausa/Fulani 348 (37.2) 70.4 (47.8–86.3) 29.6 (13.7–52.6)  
 Kanui/Shuwa 254 (27.2) 72.0 (53.9–85.0) 28.0 (15.0–46.1)  
 Igbo 64 (6.9) 67.0 (40.9–85.7) 33.0 (14.3–59.1)  
 Yoruba 114 (12.2) 57.1 (37.9–74.4) 42.9 (25.6–62.1)  
 Others 155 (16.6) 67.7 (39.9–87.3) 32.3 (12.7–61.0)  
Education level       0.046*
 >Secondary 267 (28.7) 60.9 (32.8–79.7) 39.1 (20.3–61.8)  
 Secondary 333 (35.8) 66.5 (44.9–82.9) 33.5 (17.1–55.1)  
 <Secondary 330 (35.5) 76.6 (50.1–91.4) 23.4 (8.6–49.9)  
Occupation       0.038*
 White collar 151 (16.2) 60.0 (41.7–75.8) 40.0 (24.2–58.3)  
 Blue collar 451 (48.4) 76.6 (52.2–90.8) 23.4 (9.2–47.8)  
 Unemployed 329 (35.4) 61.5 (32.7–84.0) 38.5 (16.0–67.3)  
Car ownership       0.025*
 No 508 (54.5) 77.9 (51.7–92.1) 22.1 (7.9–48.3)  
 Yes 425 (45.5) 57.6 (36.5–76.1) 42.4 (23.9–63.5)  
Income (naira)c       0.120
 <15 000 363 (40.9) 73.6 (50.2–88.5) 26.4 (11.5–49.8)  
 16 000–45 000 360 (40.6) 72.2 (50.6–86.8) 27.8 (13.2–49.2)  
 46 000–90 000 86 (9.7) 58.2 (36.7–77.0) 41.8 (23.0–63.3)  
 >90 000 78 (8.8) 60.0 (21.8–89.0) 40.0 (11.0–78.2)  

aValues based on estimated population size (values may not sum to 100.0, due to rounding).

bP value based on χ2 test; *P < 0.05 considered significant.

cClassification based on Nigerian salary scale.

Table 2 shows sex differences in physical activity prevalence among physically active participants across different age groups, occupations, income groups, educational levels, and car ownership status. More men than women were physically active, and the proportion of physically active individuals tended to decrease with increasing age among men and increase with increasing age among women. While the proportion of physically active men decreased from 75.6% in the youngest group to 53.6% in the oldest group, the proportion of physically active women increased from 68.1% in the youngest group to 69.5% in the oldest group. There were no clear sex differences in the patterns of physical activity prevalence among physically active adults in relation to income group, education level, or car ownership. While the prevalence of physical activity tended to increase with higher education among both women (from 58.8% to 76.0%) and men (62.0% to 77.1%), prevalence tended to decrease with higher income (from 75.0% to 54.1% among women and from 71.7% to 62.4% among men) and with car ownership (from 79.8% to 51.9% among women and from 76.1% to 60.6% among men) in both sexes.

Table 2. Patterns of physical activity prevalence by sociodemographic characteristics among physically active men and women (n = 640).

  na Womenb (n = 272) Menb (n = 368)


% physical activity
(95% CI)
% physical activity
(95% CI)
Age group      
 20–34 years 231 68.1 (25.9–90.8) 75.6 (39.8–94.2)
 35–44 years 206 75.8 (43.8–93.5) 68.9 (34.8–91.8)
 45–54 years 124 76.4 (15.6–98.1) 65.1 (12.2–97.0)
 ≥55 years 79 69.5 (36.4–88.1) 53.6 (31.9–82.8)
All age groups 640 69.3 (48.9–84.1) 68.0 (44.1–85.2)
Education level      
 >Secondary 163 58.8 (39.0–76.2) 62.0 (37.3–81.8)
 Secondary 223 67.7 (47.5–82.9) 65.8 (40.9–84.2)
 <Secondary 253 76.0 (53.7–89.6) 77.1 (43.8–93.6)
Occupation      
 White collar 92 64.6 (51.8–75.6) 58.0 (37.0–76.5)
 Blue collar 346 75.2 (43.6–92.2) 77.3 (55.4–90.3)
 Unemployed 202 66.5 (47.9–81.1) 52.7 (10.2–91.6)
Car ownership      
 No 396 79.8 (51.7–89.4) 76.1 (50.2–91.0)
 Yes 244 51.9 (34.8–68.5) 60.6 (36.2–80.6)
Income (naira)c      
 <15 000 267 75.0 (51.7–89.4) 71.7 (45.3–88.6)
 16 000–45 000 260 72.2 (51.7–86.3) 72.2 (49.5–87.3)
 46 000–90 000 50 65.9 (43.4–83.0) 55.9 (30.4–78.6)
 >90 000 47 54.1 (22.1–89.0) 62.4 (21.7–90.9)

aValues based on estimated population size (values may not sum to 640 due to missing data).

bData are from physically active participants only (n = 640), not the overall study sample.

cClassification based on Nigerian salary scale.

Table 3 shows the ORs, SEMs, and CIs for the association between prevalence of physical activity and sociodemographic variables. Married participants were about 52% more likely to be physically active (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.02–4.73) than those who were single or never married. Participants with blue collar jobs were more than twice as likely to be physically active (OR = 2.19, CI = 1.16–4.12) as those who had white collar occupations or were unemployed. On the other hand, participants were less likely to be physically active if they owned a car (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.17–0.86) or had a monthly income greater than 90 000 naira (OR = 0.54, CI = 0.10–0.95).

Table 3. Associations between sociodemographic variables and sufficient physical activity (n = 934).

Variables Physical activity

ORa SE (OR) 95% CI
Sex      
 Male 1.00    
 Female 1.06 0.171 0.69–1.61
Age group (years)      
 20–34 1.00    
 35–44 1.97 1.258 0.31–12.57
 45–54 1.83 1.328 0.25–13.48
 ≥55 1.49 0.799 0.10–32.26
Marital status      
 Single/never married 1.00    
 Married 1.52 0.379 1.04–4.37*
 Divorced/separated 2.56 0.427 0.39–18.64
Education level      
 >Secondary education 1.00    
 Secondary education 1.28 0.416 0.75–2.19
 <Secondary education 2.10 0.231 0.76–5.79
Occupation      
 White collar 1.00    
 Blue collar 2.19 0.393 1.16–4.12*
 Unemployed 1.06 0.484 0.41–2.78
Car ownership      
 No 1.00    
 Yes 0.38 0.328 0.17–0.86*
Income (naira)      
 <15 000 1.00    
 16 000–45 000 0.93 0.696 0.55–1.59
 46 000–90 000 0.50 0.625 0.19–1.06
 >90 000 0.54 0.391 0.10–0.95*

OR: odds ratios, SE: standard error.

aOdds ratios adjusted for all variables in table; *significant odds ratio.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, no published study has assessed the prevalence of physical activity and the way in which sociodemographic factors relate to physical activity levels in a subnational sample of Nigerian adults. This study revealed that about 68% of participants met WHO recommendations for sufficient physical activity. This prevalence is lower than those reported in 18 of the 22 African countries that participated in the recent WHO Stepwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance.5 Only in Ivory Coast (66.7%), Algeria (66.5%), Mauritania (53.1%), and Mali (46.8%) was the prevalence of physical activity lower than in the present study. However, our finding appears to reflect regional patterns of physical activity in Africa as observed in the WHO African study. In that study,5 most countries located in the same sub-region of West Africa as Nigeria had physical activity prevalence similar to that in the present study.

The prevalence rate of physical activity in Nigeria, as in other West African countries, appears to be lower than that of countries in other regions of Africa. However, we advise caution in directly comparing our results with those from the study of 22 African countries, because although the same cut-off was used to determine prevalence of physical activity, different measures were used in the studies. The IPAQ used in the present study was designed for population surveillance of physical activity19 but has been reported to overestimate physical activity prevalence as compared with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) used in the study of 22 African countries5 and other measures of physical activity.2224 However, the GPAQ was not used in the present study because, unlike the IPAQ,16 it has not been validated and tested in Nigeria. Nevertheless, our findings provide preliminary insight into physical activity prevalence among Nigerian adults.

Although, no significant difference was found in the prevalence of physical activity between men and women, physical activity tended to decrease with increasing age among active men but tended to increase with increasing age among active women. This finding is contrary to those from some other countries, where physical activity level was reported to be higher among men than among women and prevalence rates tended to decrease with increasing age in both sexes.6,2532 While it is difficult to explain these discrepant findings, our results may reflect the very high level of physical activity among divorced/separated (80.4%) adults, which mostly comprised older women. Perhaps Nigerian women who were divorced/separated and thus older had more work responsibilities, in addition to their traditional domestic duties (house/yard chores). If so, they would have had more job-related physical activity as compared with married or single women, who were younger. Also, older women in this study had lower incomes and education level and were less likely to own a car. The routine of walking daily to the market or doing shopping among these older women might explain why physical activity increased with increasing age among physically active Nigerian women in this study.

Being married was positively associated with sufficient physical activity. This is contrary to findings from previous international studies, which found positive associations between physical activity and being single.25,26 Because guidelines for defining sufficient physical activity in the international literature are mostly based on leisure time activity,17,18 it is possible that married participants in the present study were more physically active in other domains of physical activity, such as work- and transport-related physical activity, than in recreational physical activity. Married African adults, especially men, may engage in more job- and transport-related physical activities because of societal expectations that they be breadwinners of the family. However, information on parity was not included in our study, and thus it is unclear whether being married per se or having children was responsible for the present discrepant result. Future research should fully explore the effect of marital status on physical activity behaviors of African adults.

We found that participants with high incomes (the high socioeconomic group) were less likely to be active than those with lower incomes. Individuals with high socioeconomic status may have jobs that are less physically demanding; thus, their overall physical activity would be lower than those with lower incomes, whose jobs might be more physically demanding. Our finding that participants with blue collar jobs (traders, artisans, farmers, etc.) were twice as likely to be physically active than those with white collar jobs (office workers) confirms this hypothesis. High socioeconomic groups in Nigeria tend to be senior civil servants, bureaucrats, technocrats, professionals and business executives. In developed countries, the leisure and vacation activities of individuals of high socioeconomic status tend to include sports and games; however, for Nigerians of high socioeconomic status, leisure and vacation tend to be passive, with little physical activity. Furthermore, appreciation of wellness and health promotion activities is yet to permeate society in this part of the world.

Despite the importance of active commuting (cycling and walking) as key means of energy expenditure and its resulting contribution to health,3336 automobiles are gradually becoming the dominant form of transportation in most countries, severely reducing active modes of transportation.37 The likelihood of walking or cycling is believed to be inversely related to the number of automobiles per household, regardless of income level.33 Similarly, about 61% of adults who own a car (motorized transportation/passive commuting) in the present study were not sufficiently physically active to meet WHO recommendations and were less likely to be active as compared with their counterparts who did not own a car. These findings have implications for physical activity intervention in Nigeria, because household ownership of a car can easily be misconstrued as economic progress and an improved standard of living in African society. Because of the rapid urbanization and Westernization taking place in many African countries, it may be appropriate to advocate for integrated preventive strategies that focus on positive behavioral change. Such strategies could be based on ecologic models of behavior, which acknowledge that health behaviors are influenced by multiple levels, including individual, social/cultural, built environmental, and policy dimensions.38 Interventions based on ecologic models can affect entire populations on a relatively permanent basis39 and are the dominant approach for physical activity promotion worldwide.9,40

This study has some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Although the sample was selected to be representative, the response rate was comparatively low, which could compromise the external validity and generalizability of the findings. The use of a self-report measure of physical activity, with the potential for information bias, is another limitation of this study. Overreporting due to social desirability leading to overestimation of the prevalence of physical activity has been reported for the IPAQ.22 Moreover, some of the participants in the present study were older than 69 years, the upper age limit for which the IPAQ was designed. It is not clear if the IPAQ can adequately capture physical activity level for older age groups; however, previous studies have used the IPAQ to assess physical activity among adults older than 69 years,22,26,41 and problems associated with the IPAQ were found not to be age-related.42 Also, the validity of the short version of the IPAQ in adequately capturing patterns of physical activity has been challenged.43 The short IPAQ does not differentiate between activity contexts. For example, individuals may engage in walking activity solely for leisure or transportation or engage in physical activity as part of house chores, sports, or for job commuting or transportation purposes. A means to address this shortcoming is the use of domain-specific measure such as the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), which was developed using a process similar to that for the IPAQ.44 However, there are similar concerns with respect to GPAQ use, namely, its potential for measurement error and its comparability among countries.45 However, a culturally adapted version of the IPAQ long-form may be a much better alternative for future studies in the African continent, because the leisure and transport components of the IPAQ long-form seem to be the most relevant for population surveillance and public health intervention.46

Despite the above limitations, in view of its standardized survey methodology and measures and appropriate statistical methods, this study provides a valuable snapshot of physical activity prevalence and its patterns among Nigerian adults with different sociodemographic characteristics. The findings have implications for identifying the sociodemographic groups in Nigerian society that need to be targeted for effective interventions promoting physical activity.

Conclusion

The present study is one of the first to use WHO recommendations and guidelines to estimate the prevalence of physical activity among Nigerian adults. About 68% of Nigerian adults living in Maiduguri city met the WHO recommendation. However, the proportion of adults that met these recommendations for physical activity varied significantly by sociodemographic characteristics: those who were divorced/separated, did not own a car, and had a lower socioeconomic status—as indicated by low income, low education level, and blue collar occupation—were more likely to be physically active. Given that the prevalence of physical activity varied between sociodemographic subgroups, interventions based on ecologic models of health behaviors may be necessary in promoting physical activity among Nigerian adults.

ONLINE ONLY MATERIALS

eQuestionnaire.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Short Last 7 Day Version.

je-23-169-s001.pdf (45.1KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank Sanda M. Kolo, a student in the Department of Physiotherapy, University of Maiduguri for his assistance with data preparation. We also thank Muhammad Ismail, a physiotherapist intern at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital for his technical assistance with the preparation of the map of the city of Maiduguri. Finally, we express our gratitude to all participants in this study for their cooperation.

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization. Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Report 2002. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370:1929–38 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61696-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in developing countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11Suppl 1):S9–30 10.1210/jc.2008-1595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Regional Committee for Africa. Diseases in the African region: current situation and perspective. Maputo: World Health Organization; 2005.
  • 5.Guthold R, Louazani SA, Riley LM, Cowan MJ, Bovet P, Damasceno A, et al. Physical activity in 22 African countries: Results from WHO STEPwise Approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(1):52–60 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, Chatterji S, Morabia A. Worldwide variability in Physical inactivity, a 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:486–94 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical fact sheet and population census. Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2008 [cited 2011 January 25]. Available from: http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
  • 8.Olayinka K, Soyibo A, Atinmo T. Impact of globalization on food consumption, health and nutrition in Nigeria. In: Globalization of food systems in developing countries: impact on food security and nutrition. Food and Nutrition Paper 83. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2004 [cited 2009 December19]. Available from: http://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5736e/y5736e00.pdf
  • 9.World Health Assembly 57.17. Global strategy on diet and physical activity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Armstrong T, Bonita R. Capacity building for an integrated noncommunicable disease risk factor surveillance system in developing countries. Ethn Dis. 2003;13(2Suppl 2):S13–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ORC Macro. Nigeria Demographics and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland: National Population Commission and ORC Macro; 2004.
  • 12.Kagu MB, Ahmed SG, Mohammed AS, Moshood WK, Malah MB, Kehinde JM. Anti-A and Anti-B Heamolysins among group “O” voluntary blood donors in Northeastern Nigeria. Journal of Transfusion. 2011; ID 302406 [cited 2010 November 27]. Available from: http://www.sagehindawi.com/journals/jtf/2011/302406.html
  • 13.McGee K, Sethi D, Peden M, Habibula S. Guidelines for conducting community surveys on injuries and violence. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004;11(4):303–6 10.1080/156609704/233/327505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2006;1:9–14 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macfarlane SB Conducting a descriptive survey: 2. choosing a sampling strategy. Trop Doct. 1997;27(1):14–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oyeyemi AL, Oyeyemi AY, Adegoke BO, Oyetoke FO, Aliyu HN, Aliyu SU, et al. Cross cultural adaptation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Hausa version in Nigeria. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:156 10.1186/1471-2288-11-156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. ; American College of Sports Medicine . American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quality and quantity of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12 country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–95 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oyeyemi GM, Adewara AA, Adeyemi RA. Complex survey data analysis: a comparison of SAS, SPSS and STATA. Asian J Math Stat. 2010;3:33–9 10.3923/ajms.2010.33.39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lemeshow S, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, Lafont S, Orgogozo JM, Commenges D. Illustration of analysis taking into account complex survey considerations: the association between wine consumption and dementia in the PAQUID study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:298–306 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Addressing over-reporting on the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:299–305 10.1079/PHN2002427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Jones DA, Reis JP, Addy CL, Bowles HR, et al. Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1584–92 10.1249/01.mss.0000229457.73333.9a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Johnson-Kozlow M, Sallis JF, Gilpin EA, Rock CL, Pierce JP. Comparative validation of the IPAQ and the 7-day PAR among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:7 10.1186/1479-5868-3-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Al-Tannir M, Kobrosly S, Itani T, El-Rajab M, Tannir S. Prevalence of physical activity among Lebanese Adults: A cross-sectional study. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:315–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagströmer M, Bauman A, Sjöström M. Adherence to physical activity recommendations and the influence of socio-demographic correlates—a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:367 10.1186/1471-2458-8-367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gal DL, Santos AC, Barros H. Leisure-time versus full-day energy expenditure: a cross-sectional study of sedentarism in a Portuguese urban population. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:16 10.1186/1471-2458-5-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Trinh OT, Nguyen ND, Dibley MJ, Phongsavan P, Bauman AE. The prevalence of physical inactivity among adults in Ho Chi Minth city. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:204 10.1186/1471-2458-8-204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevalence of physical activity including lifestyle activities among adults—United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:764–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Lentzas Y, Stefanadis C. Epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity in sociodemographic, lifestyle and psychological characteristics of men and women in Greece: The ATTICA Study. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:37 10.1186/1471-2458-5-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Teh KC, Ong VT. Physical activity patterns of Singaporeans in 2001. Singapore Med J. 2004;45:517–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bauman A, Bull F, Chey T, Craig CL, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, et al. ; IPS Group . The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: Results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:21 10.1186/1479-5868-6-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Evenson KR, Rosamond WD, Cai J, Pereira MA, Ainsworth BE. Occupational physical activity in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(5):351–7 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00438-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Merom D, Miller Y, Lymer S, Bauman A. Effect of Australia’s walk to Work Day Campaign on adults’ active commuting and physical activity behaviour. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19(3):159–62 10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Phongsavan P, Merom D, Marshall A, Bauman A. Estimating physical activity level: the role of domestic activities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:466–7 10.1136/jech.2003.012096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Salmon J, Owen N, Bauman A, Schmitz MK, Booth M. Leisure time, occupational, and household physical activity among professional, skilled, and less-skilled workers and homemakers. Prev Med. 2000;30:191–9 10.1006/pmed.1999.0619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sallis JF Environmental and policy research on physical activity is going global. Res Exerc Epidemiol. 2011;13(2):111–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2008; p. 465–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Global Advocacy for Physical Activity (GAPA) the Advocacy Council of the International Society for Physical Activity and Health (ISPAH). NCD Prevention: Investments that Work for Physical Activity, 2011 [cited 2011 March 17]. Available from: www.globalpa.org.uk/investmentsthatwork [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 41.Kolbe-Alexander TL, Lambert EV, Harkins JB, Ekelund U. Comparison of two methods of measuring physical activity in South African older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2006;14:98–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Heesch KC, van Uffelen JG, Hill RL, Brown WJ. What do IPAQ questions mean to older adults? Lessons from cognitive interviews. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:35 10.1186/1479-5868-7-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Armstrong TA, Bull FC. Development of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. 2006;14:66–70 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Bull F, Craig CL, Hagströmer M, Sallis JF, et al. Progress and pitfalls in the use of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) for adult physical activity surveillance. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6Suppl 1:S5–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hallal PC, Gomez LF, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Mosquera J, Florindo AA, et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7Suppl 2:S259–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

eQuestionnaire.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Short Last 7 Day Version.

je-23-169-s001.pdf (45.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES