Skip to main content
International Journal of General Medicine logoLink to International Journal of General Medicine
. 2013 Jun 28;6:515–518. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S46932

Effects of proton pump inhibitors and electrolyte disturbances on arrhythmias

Elie El-Charabaty 1, Chadi Saifan 1,, Mokhtar Abdallah 1, Ali Naboush 1, Daniel Glass 1, Georges Azzi 1, Yorg Azzi 1, Ahsan Khan 1, Hassan Baydoun 1, Chetana Rondla 1, Ninad Parekh 1, Suzanne El-Sayegh 1
PMCID: PMC3700779  PMID: 23847429

Abstract

Several case reports have been written regarding the relationship between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and hypomagnesemia. Some of these reported cases have electrocardiogram abnormalities where electrolytes deficiencies were the contributing factor for these events. This study investigates the correlation between different arrhythmias and the use of PPI and hypomagnesaemia incidence. Four-hundred and twenty-one patients admitted to the critical care unit with unstable angina, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included in this study. One-hundred and eighty-four patients (43.8%) received PPI and 237 patients (51.16%) did not, magnesium levels were low (<1.8 mg/dL) in 95 patients (22.5%), and 167 patients (39.6%) developed arrhythmias. The P-values for the regression coefficient association for the use of PPI and the level of magnesium were P = 1.31e−29 and P = 8e−102, respectively. The P-values indicate that there is a statistically significant association between the PPI use, magnesium levels, and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, with a strong correlation factor of 0.817. Patients receiving PPIs should be followed closely for magnesium deficiency, especially if they experience acute cardiovascular events, because this may contribute to worsening arrhythmias and further complications.

Keywords: electrolyte disturbances, medications side effects, cardiac arrhythmias

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used therapeutic agents with more than 119 million filled prescriptions in the USA in 2009.1 They have been associated with a wide variety of side effects including renal failure,2,3 respiratory infections,4 Clostridium difficile colitis,5 and hip fractures.6 There have been several case reports and case series’ of proton pump related hypomagnesemia with a wide array of symptoms, including cardiac arrhythmias and seizures.718

Magnesium is the second most common intracellular cation and is involved in a wide range of cellular functions, including protein synthesis, enzymatic reactions, and the regulation of ion channels. Significantly low serum magnesium levels have been associated with bradycardia, hypotension, seizures, tetany, and death.19,21 Even mild hypomagnesemia has been correlated with cardiovascular and total mortality.22 Despite a recent retrospective study demonstrating an association between hypomagnesaemia and PPI use in patients on diuretics, there is no large scale study on PPI use and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. To address this question, we examined the association between the use of PPI, serum magnesium levels, and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia in a large group of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an acute coronary syndrome and subsequently started on a PPI.

Methods

This study included patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital to the ICU or critical care unit (CCU) with a diagnosis of unstable angina, ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), between 2007 and 2012 started on PPI during their hospital stay. This was a retrospective chart review study. Analysis involved checking occurrence of arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and atrial tachycardia. Potassium and magnesium blood levels were checked. Electrocardiograms with associated arrhythmias were reviewed. Any ICU or CCU patients older than 18 years of age diagnosed on admission with unstable angina, NSTEMI, or STEMI, were included in this study. Pregnant women, cognitively impaired patients, patients less than 18 years of age, and patients diagnosed with chronic atrial fibrillation on admission were excluded.

Results

Four-hundred and twenty-one patients admitted to the CCU with unstable angina, NSTEMI, or STEMI were included in this study. One-hundred and eighty-four patients (43.8%) received PPI and 237 patients (51.16%) did not. The normal level of magnesium is 1.8–2.4 mg/dL and a normal potassium level is 3.5–5 mmol/L. Of our sample, 81.7% of patients were older than 55, 95.2% had hypertension, 37.5% had diabetes mellitus type II, 47% had chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate < 60), 71.2% had NSTEMI, and 25% had STEMI. PPI were prescribed during the hospital admission as either part of the gastrointestinal prophylaxis protocol for patients admitted to CCU (171 patients) or because they had peptic ulcer disease (13 patients).

Low magnesium levels (<1.8 mg/dL) were present in 95 patients (22.5%) and 167 patients (39.6%) developed arrhythmias. The P-values for the tests of significance determined using regression coefficient association for the use of PPI and the level of magnesium were P = 1.31e−29 and P = 8e−102, respectively, indicating that there is a statistically significant association between PPI use, the level of magnesium, and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, with a strong correlation factor of 0.817.

Discussion

In this large, hospital-based cross-sectional study, PPI exposure during hospitalization was correlated with lower serum magnesium concentrations and cardiac arrhythmias.

Although the risk of hypomagnesemia and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias has been suggested by smaller observational studies and case reports, this study is the first to our knowledge to provide an analysis between PPI use and magnesium concentrations and correlation with cardiac arrhythmias in a large sample, and supports the notion that PPI use may lead to hypomagnesemia and arrhythmias in susceptible individuals.

The pathophysiology of PPI-induced hypomagnesemia is still not certain. Magnesium homeostasis depends on the balance between renal excretion and intestinal absorption. Intestinal absorption occurs through two major pathways: active and passive. Active transcellular transport across the apical lumen occurs via the channel transient receptor potential melastatin 6.24 Tight junction proteins claudin-16 and claudin-19 modulate passive movement down a concentration gradient which occurs paracellularly and is thought to be the major route of magnesium absorption.25 Tubular reclamation in the proximal tubule and thick ascending limb via paracellular absorption accounts for most renal excretion,26 with some active absorption in the distal convoluted tubule.27

New scientific data suggest that PPIs can cause hypomagnesaemia by inhibiting intestinal absorption and not by increasing renal wasting.23 In a case series of hypomagnesemic patients on PPI therapy,10 urine magnesium levels were appropriately low. Intravenous magnesium rapidly corrected serum concentrations, but oral magnesium did not,7,9 except in one case.11 Cell culture data suggests that PPIs disrupt passive magnesium absorption across intestinal epithelial cells.28

By irreversibly blocking the hydrogen/potassium adenosine triphosphatase enzyme, PPIs inhibit the secretion of the acidic hydrogen+ ions into the gastric lumen. Studies on both animals and human showed expression of the hydrogen+/potassium+ ATPase enzyme in their myocardium, and ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated from heart muscle strips of patients with end stage heart disease undergoing heart transplantation.29,30 Subsequent studies on the electrophysiological effects of PPI on the myocardial cells were conducted, and showed a dose dependent reduction in isometric and isotonic shortening of myocytes cells as a consequence of the impairment of calcium uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, leading to intracellular increased calcium concentration.30 Since calcium concentration is an important factor in myocytes automaticity31 and since focal arrhythmias are usually secondary to increased automaticity, a case control study was conducted on 80 patients undergoing an electrophysiological study and found that there was a 4-fold increase in focal arrhythmias in the group of the 40 patients on PPI when compared to the control group not on PPI.32

There are several important limitations of our analysis. Given the observational nature of the study, causality cannot be established between PPI exposure and serum magnesium concentration and cardiac arrhythmias. In addition, as our sample is comprised of critically ill patients, generalization to the outpatient population is uncertain. Diuretic use has been proven to be associated with PPI-induced hypomagnesemia. Our research did not collect data on diuretic use and stratification by diuretic use may have demonstrated a greater effect. Therefore, well-controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify all the clinical issues related to the use of this widely prescribed class of medication.

Table 1.

The total number of patients (421) separated by those who received PPIs (184) and those who did not (237)

PPI (184)
No PPI (237)
Low magnesium (47) No low magnesium (137) Low magnesium (48) No low magnesium (189)
CV (+15) (−32) (+32) (−105) (+25) (−23) (+59) (−130)

Notes: The second row shows the number of patients who developed low magnesium levels for both groups. The third row shows the number of patients who developed (or not) cardiac arrhythmias. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of patients in that category.

Abbreviations: CV, cardiac arrhythmias; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.IMS Health INSP, Top Therapy Classes by United States Dispensed Presciptions, Data from 2007 Available at: http://www.imshealth.com/cds/ims/Global/Content/Corporate/Press%20Room/Top-line%20Market%20Data/2009%20Top-line%20Market%20Data/Top%20Therapy%20Classes%20by%20U.S.Sales.pdfAccessed March 3, 2011
  • 2.Ray S, Delaney M, Muller AF. Proton pump inhibitors and acute interstitial nephritis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sierra F, Suarez M, Rey M, Vela MF. Systematic review: Proton pump inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(4):545–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herzig SJ, Howell MD, Ngo LH, Marcantonio ER. Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 2009;301(20):2120–2128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Howell MD, Novack V, Grgurich P, et al. Iatrogenic gastric acid suppression and the risk of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):784–790. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Faulhaber GA, Furlanetto TW. Could magnesium depletion play a role on fracture risk in PPI users? Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(19):1776. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Epstein M, McGrath S, Law F. Proton-pump inhibitors and hypomagnesemic hypoparathyroidism. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1834–1836. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc066308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Metz DC, Sostek MB, Ruszniewski P, Forsmark CE, Monyak J, Pisegna JR. Effects of esomeprazole on acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(12):2648–2654. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01509.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shabajee N, Lamb EJ, Sturgess I, Sumathipala RW. Omeprazole and refractory hypomagnesaemia. BMJ. 2008;337:a425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39505.738981.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cundy T, Dissanayake A. Severe hypomagnesaemia in long-term users of proton-pump inhibitors. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69(2):338–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Broeren MA, Geerdink EA, Vader HL, van den Wall Bake AW. Hypomagnesemia induced by several proton-pump inhibitors. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):755–756. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuipers MT, Thang HD, Arntzenius AB. Hypomagnesaemia due to use of proton pump inhibitors – a review. Neth J Med. 2009;67(5):169–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hoorn EJ, van der Hoek J, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ, Bolwerk C, Zietse R. A case series of proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(1):112–116. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Regolisti G, Cabassi A, Parenti E, Maggiore U, Fiaccadori E. Severe hypomagnesemia during long-term treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(1):168–174. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mackay JD, Bladon PT. Hypomagnesaemia due to proton-pump inhibitor therapy: a clinical case series. QJM. 2010;103(6):387–395. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cundy T, Mackay J. Proton pump inhibitors and severe hypomagnesaemia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27(2):180–185. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833ff5d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Quasdorff M, Mertens J, Dinter J, Steffen HM. Recurrent hypomagnesemia with proton-pump inhibitor rechallenge. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(6):405–407. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-6-201109200-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Furlanetto TW, Faulhaber GA. Hypomagnesemia and proton pump inhibitors: below the tip of the iceberg. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1391–1392. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Flink EB. Magnesium deficiency. Etiology and clinical spectrum. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1981;647:125–137. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1981.tb02648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vallee BL, Wacker WE, Ulmer DD. The magnesium-deficiency tetany syndrome in man. N Engl J Med. 1960;262:155–161. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196001282620401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moore MJ, Flink EB. Magnesium deficiency as a cause of serious arrhythmias. Arch Intern Med. 1978;138(5):825–826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reffelmann T, Ittermann T, Dörr M, et al. Low serum magnesium concentrations predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219(1):280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Danziger J, William JH, Scott DJ, et al. Proton-pump inhibitor use is associated with low serum magnesium concentrations. Kidney Int. 2013;83(4):692–699. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schlingmann KP, Weber S, Peters M, et al. Hypomagnesemia with secondary hypocalcemia is caused by mutations in TRPM6, a new member of the TRPM gene family. Nat Genet. 2002;31(2):166–170. doi: 10.1038/ng889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hou J, Renigunta A, Konrad M, et al. Claudin-16 and claudin-19 interact and form a cation-selective tight junction complex. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):619–628. doi: 10.1172/JCI33970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quamme GA. Control of magnesium transport in the thick ascending limb. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(2 Pt 2):F197–F210. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1989.256.2.F197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dai LJ, Ritchie G, Kerstan D, Kang HS, Cole DE, Quamme GA. Magnesium transport in the renal distal convoluted tubule. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(1):51–84. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thongon N, Krishnamra N. Omeprazole decreases magnesium transport across Caco-2 monolayers. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(12):1574–1583. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nagashima R, Tsuda Y, Maruyama T, Kanaya S, Fujino T, Niho Y. Possible evidence for transmembrane K(+)-H+ exchange system in guinea pig myocardium. Jpn Heart J. 1999;40(3):351–364. doi: 10.1536/jhj.40.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schillinger W, Teucher N, Sossalla S, et al. Negative inotropy of the gastric proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole in myocardium from humans and rabbits: evaluation of mechanisms. Circulation. 2007;116(1):57–66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mangoni ME, Nargeot J. Genesis and regulation of the heart automaticity. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(3):919–982. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marcus GM. Proton Pump Inhibitors Associated With Focal Arrhythmias. Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section, University of California; San Francisco, CA, USA: 2010. Available at http://www.innovationsincrm.com/cardiac-rhythm-management/2010/december/29-proton-pump-inhibitors-focal-arrhythmias. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of General Medicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES