Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Jul 8;3:2163. doi: 10.1038/srep02163

Biopolymer-Activated Graphitic Carbon Nitride towards a Sustainable Photocathode Material

Yuanjian Zhang 1,a, Zoë Schnepp 2,b, Junyu Cao 2, Shuxin Ouyang 2, Ying Li 1, Jinhua Ye 2, Songqin Liu 1
PMCID: PMC3703604  PMID: 23831846

Abstract

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) conversion of solar light into chemical fuels is one of the most promising solutions to the challenge of sustainable energy. Graphitic carbon (IV) nitride polymer (g-CN) is an interesting sustainable photocathode material due to low-cost, visible-light sensitivity, and chemical stability up to 500°C in air. However, grain boundary effects and limited active sites greatly hamper g-CN activity. Here, we demonstrate biopolymer-activation of g-CN through simultaneous soft-templating of a sponge-like structure and incorporation of active carbon-dopant sites. This facile approach results in an almost 300% increase in the cathodic PEC activity of g-CN under simulated solar-irradiation.

Sustainable energy is one of the biggest challenges facing our current society. One solution is to use photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells incorporating semiconductors to directly convert solar energy into chemical fuels1,2. As synthesized graphitic carbon (IV) nitride polymer (g-CN, Fig. 1) is an attractive metal-free semiconductor that can be used in photocatalytic water splitting and dye degradation and optoelectronic conversion under visible light without photo-corrosion, and also catalysis of various other important reactions3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. In general, g-CN is a low-cost material with a band gap of approximately 2.7 eV, depending on structural variations or the presence of adatoms12,13,14,15. More interestingly, due to the graphitic structure, g-CN has a remarkably high stability against oxidation in air up to 500°C4, which is superior to most other organic counterparts (~150°C)16.

Figure 1. Ideal molecular structures of graphitic carbon nitride (the defects are not shown for clarity), alginate, and gelatin.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

One challenge for g-CN is that the conversion efficiency of pristine g-CN solids in sunlight is low, due to limited visible light absorption, low surface area and grain boundary effects. For optimizing light absorption, there has been intensive investigation of various ionic, covalent and non-covalent chemical dopants12,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21. Reducing the grain size is in principle a general solution for improving electron transport due to high overall surface area, but is still difficult for g-CN. For instance, hard templating strategies using mesoporous silica, silica nanoparticles and anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membrane have been used to prepare nanostructured g-CN22,23,24,25,26,27. However, these require hazardous etchants such as HF as well as being time consuming, multi-step procedures.

Here, we demonstrate a sustainable one-pot route to sponge-like structures of g-CN with active carbon-doped sites. This method exploits the inherent self-organization of biopolymers such as alginate (seaweed polysaccharide) and gelatin (polypeptide) as an in situ template (see Fig. 1). Many biopolymers readily form extended hierarchical structures in water through e.g. coiled coils and double or triple helices. They also exhibit diverse chemical functionality (e.g. carboxylate, hydroxyl) and thus strongly bind to metal cations forming gels with high thermal stability. These factors have enabled them to act as an efficient template for nanostructures of diverse systems such as metal oxides and carbides28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. To date, however, there are few examples of using biopolymers as ‘soft' templates for ‘soft' (organic) nanomaterials. In this work, we use abundant biopolymers as a template to disperse and bind a common carbon nitride precursor. The resulting sponge-like g-CN nanostructure, the simultaneous carbon doping, and their effects on the activity as a photocathode material (a proof of concept application of semiconducting g-CN) is presented.

Results

Aqueous dicyandiamide (DCDA, the precursor for g-CN) was mixed with alginate or gelatin solution and then dried to give solids with 5 or 10% biopolymer by mass. These were heated to 550°C in air for 4 hours with a 4 hour ramp time and the as-prepared samples were named as Alg-x-CN or Gel-x-CN, x = 5 or 10. As a control, pristine g-CN was also prepared using only DCDA under the same conditions. The structure and texture of these carbon nitride polymers were first evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). It was found that all FT-IR spectra of Alg-x-CN and Gel-x-CN are very similar to g-CN, showing typical stretches of the C-N extended network ranging from 800 to 1800 cm−1 (Supplementary Fig. S1). Furthermore, the XRD patterns of the Alg-x-CN and Gel-x-CN maintain the same characteristic (002) interlayer-stacking peak as the control g-CN (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, the original graphitic C-N motif of Alg-x-CN and Gel-x-CN stayed mostly unchanged with respect to the pristine g-CN.

In contrast, the morphology and microstructure of the carbon nitride is dramatically changed upon interaction with the biopolymers during calcination. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) images in Fig. 2 and Fig. S3 show that the control g-CN solid was a monolith, while Alg-x-CN, and Gel-x-CN became sponge-like. Accordingly, the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms (Supplementary Fig. S4) show abrupt uptake at P/P0 > 0.9 due to the inter particle voids. Moreover, when the ratio of biopolymers to dicyandiamide further increased, some wrinkled graphene-liked sheets were also observed (e.g. Alg-10-CN, see Supplementary Fig. S3a inset). This resulted in a substantial increase in BET surface area for all of the biopolymer-activated samples (Supplementary Fig. S4 and Table S1). For example, the surface area of Alg-5-CN (42 m2/g) was 4 times that of control g-CN (10 m2/g), and that of Alg-10-CN (63 m2/g) was even higher (ca. 6 times).

Figure 2. Microstructure of carbon nitrides.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

SEM images of pristine g-CN (a) and Alg-5-CN (b), and TEM image of Alg-5-CN (c).

This result is particularly interesting since the preparation of “soft” nanomaterials by so-called ‘soft-templating' still presents a considerable challenge37. For example, it was reported that preparation of nanostructured g-CN using surfactants such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Triton X-100, P123, and F127 under the same condition was difficult, unless under a sophisticated calcination-program and/or with additional pretreatment for the precursors38,39. The practical problem was that condensation towards larger extended CN-structures takes place (~390°C) above the complete decomposition temperature of the soft-templates. In this regard, alginate and gelatin provide a unique alternative, since they combine self-assembly characteristics analogous to surfactants with relatively high thermal stability. This is supported by thermogravimetric (TG) curves which reveal that a significant amount of carbonized alginate (20wt%) and gelatin (48 wt%) existed up to 390°C, acting as porogens in the formation of the g-CN macrostructure (Supplementary Fig. S5).

It was noted that when the ratio of alginate or gelatin to DCDA increased, the C/N ratio of the as-prepared Alg-x-CN and Gel-x-CN increased slightly in comparison with g-CN (Supplementary Table S1). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to obtain further information about these carbon dopants (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. S6). As expected, one predominant C1s peak with a binding energy of 288.2 eV is observed for all carbon nitride samples, corresponding to the typical aromatic C–N–C coordination in a graphitic carbon nitride framework3. Importantly, a minor peak was also noted, which shifts upward from ca. 284 eV to 286 eV as the C/N ratio increases. This indicates the formation of some new carbon species, presumably from replacement of nitrogen in the conjugated framework of graphitic carbon nitride, since the polysaccharide and polypeptides would be fully decomposed from the calcination step and the unique high thermal stability of the g-CN was almost unchanged (Supplementary Fig. S7).

Figure 3. Dopants in carbon nitrides.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

C1s XPS (a) and ESR spectra (b) of g-CN, Alg-5-CN, and Alg-10-CN.

The incorporation of carbon-dopants into the carbon nitride polymer has a remarkable effect on the electronic properties. The electronic spin resonance (ESR) spectra at 4.2 K shows a major signal where g = 2.0034 (characteristic of paramagnetic aromatic carbon atoms) for all the samples, which increases in intensity with increasing carbon content (Fig. 3b). This clearly suggests the electronic integration of new carbon species with unpaired electrons in the lattice of the graphitic carbon nitride, which is significant for potential applications since certain amount of dopants favor efficient charge separation. Moreover, the corresponding optical absorption peaks from these carbon nitrides were shifted to lower energies with increasing carbon content (Supplementary Fig. S8a), indicating the extension of the π-conjugated structure from these carbon dopants. It was also noted that the intensity of the photoemission was strongly suppressed (Supplementary Fig. S8b), which is an essential indicator for effective separation and collection of excited electrons and holes.

Discussion

In order to investigate the potential of these materials as photocathode materials, the PEC measurements were performed using a three-electrode configuration (Fig. 4a) in an aqueous solution containing 0.1 M KCl. It was observed that the cathodic photoresponses of g-CN and Alg-5-CN gradually increased when the biased potential became more negative (Fig. 4b), and the photocurrents were prompt, steady, and reproducible during repeated on/off cycles (Fig. 4c). More interestingly, the substantial photocurrent of Alg-5-CN was much larger than that of g-CN under all biased potentials, strongly indicating the positive impact of the biopolymer-activation. For example, when the bias potential was ca. −0.2 V, the anodic photocurrent of Alg-5-CN was 2.6 times of that of g-CN in the simulated sunlight. Gel-5-CN showed a similarly enhanced photocurrent.

Figure 4. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) properties of carbon nitrides in 0.1 M KCl aqueous solution.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) The PEC cell configuration and possible charge transfer (the reference electrode was omitted for clarity). (b) Characteristic photocurrents at g-CN (black) and Alg-5-CN (red) photocathode under a chopped sunlight simulator at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. (c) Transient current response of g-CN (black) and Alg-5-CN (red) at −0.2 V vs Ag/AgCl (sat. KCl) under chopped monochromatic light at 440 nm. (d) Photo action spectra of g-CN (black), Alg-5-CN (red), and Gel-5-CN (blue) biased at −0.2 V vs Ag/AgCl (sat. KCl).

The sponge-like nanostructures of the activated carbon nitride should account in part for the improved photo-response. In general, compared with the monolith, the sponge-like nanostructure would shorten the diffusion path of free carriers, enhance mass transfer during the reaction, provide more active sites, and enhance the optical absorption of photoelectrodes as well via multiple internal reflections (see intrinsic band-absorption up to 500 nm, Fig. S8a). Interestingly, however, Alg-10-CN and Gel-10-CN, which had the highest surface area, showed a lower PEC activity (Supplementary Fig. S9). Thus, a low ratio of the biopolymers to DCDA (i.e. 5%) seemed favorable for creating sponge-like carbon nitride solids with higher PEC activity. As shown in Supplementary Table S1, indeed, when the ratio of the biopolymers to DCDA changed, not only the morphology (roughly indicated by the surface area) but also the concentration of dopants varied. Both porosity and dopants should be helpful for the enhanced photocurrents, but it is still difficult to quantify their contribution currently. For example, the BET surface area of Alg-5-CN (42 m2/g) is larger than that of Gel-5-CN (34 m2/g), however, they had a very similar photocurrent activity (see Fig. 4d), which was presumably due to the fact that the concentration of carbon dopants for Gel-5-CN (C/N 1.17) is higher than that of Alg-5-CN (C/N 1.08). Besides, it is recognized that an appropriate concentration of dopants in semiconductors can improve the mobility of the charge-carriers, but too high a concentration can increase unwanted charge recombination thus resulting in a reduced activity. Therefore, a more detailed screening of the optimum concentration of the biopolymers is required for further improvement of this system.

The incident photon-to-charge conversion efficiencies (IPCEs), biased at −0.2 V of g-CN, Alg-5-CN and Gel-5-CN as a function of wavelength, were also measured and are shown in Figure 4d. Interestingly, the IPCEs of Alg-5-CN and Gel-5-CN were much higher than that of g-CN under the monochromatic irradiation up to 500 nm (e.g. 3.1 times at 440 nm), while they were essentially the same from above 550 nm. This is consistent with the photoresponse data under solar simulation. Moreover, it suggests that the extended optical absorption of Alg/Gel-5-CN by carbon dopants (Fig. S8a) did not contribute to IPCEs, probably due to the weakened redox ability during the band-gap shrinkage21. Thus, the photo-responses here were derived from the intrinsic band excitation of carbon nitride in all cases. More notably, the highest IPCE measured (1.2% at λ = 420 nm) is comparable to those in existing reports of mesoporous polymeric carbon nitrides by hard-templating5,27 and even some p-type metal-containing counterparts (e.g. Cu-Ti-O)40. While this is still lower than those of state-of-the-art photocathodes (e.g. 40% for sophisticated Cu2O/ZnO:Al/TiO2/Pt)41, this promising preliminary result suggests that there is considerable scope for improvement in either photoelectrode layout41, co-catalyst5,27, or both. Furthermore, n-typed semiconductors such as TiO2, ZnO, Fe2O3 and WO3 have been intensively investigated as photoanodes for PEC water oxidation1,42,43,44,45,46,47. In contrast, the p-typed semiconductors, especially polymeric ones, which could be used as photocathodes for PEC water reduction are poorly represented48. In this regard, it is also interesting to consider g-CN as a photocathode material for solar fuels.

Nevertheless, the BET area values developed by soft-templating here were not as high as those by hard-templating27. However, it should be aware that the BET area is not the higher, the better for photo(electro)catalytic applications. For example, Wang et al prepared the mesoporous g-CN with BET area from 67 to 373 m2/g using silica as the hard template, but found that the sample with BET area of 67 m2/g had the highest activity27. This phenomenon was also observed in this study (Fig. 4b and Supplementary S9). It is generally because when the surface area increases, the defects where the excitions recombine also increase.

In summary, we have shown that alginate and gelatin are two promising activating agents for semiconducting graphitic carbon nitride solids. Synergistic interactions between the carbon nitride precursor and the self-organized biopolymer precursor create a sponge-like porosity with an enhanced active sites. Furthermore, by balancing the biopolymer content, a favorable concentration of active carbon dopant sites can be created in the graphitic carbon nitride network to enhance charge mobility. As a result, this proof-of-concept application shows the photocathodic performance of carbon nitrides after the activation in the best case could be greatly improved by a factor of nearly 300% under solar irradiation. Thanks to the flexible variability of molecular structures (e.g. hyaluronan, cellulose, etc.), physicochemical properties, and other functionalities (e.g. sulfonate-rich carrageenan which could be used for sulfur doping) of biopolymers, it is highly feasible to further increase the PEC activity by better balancing electronic structures (e.g. band-gap and redox ability), change-carrier mobility and surface area. Besides the facile synthesis, the abundance of both starting materials will no doubt also be beneficial to push the activated carbon nitrides as sustainable metal-free photocathode materials e.g. for PEC hydrogen evolution from water. Work focused on the more detailed activation mechanism (e.g. relationship between catalytic activity and amount of carbon dopants) and optimizing the photoelectrode layout and co-catalysts of carbon nitride solids for higher efficiency is ongoing.

Methods

Preparation of biopolymer-activated graphitic carbon nitride

Aqueous dicyandiamide (DCDA, 99%) was mixed with ammonium alginate (Protacid F20NM, FMC biopolymer, prepared by dispersing alginic acid in water and adjusting the pH to 7 with NH4OH) or gelatin (Type A, from porcine skin, Sigma-Aldrich, G2500, prepared by dissolving in hot water) solution and then dried to give solids with 5 or 10% biopolymer by mass. The samples were heated to 550°C in air for 4 hours with a 4 hour ramp time and the as-prepared samples were named as Alg-x-CN or Gel-x-CN, x = 5 or 10. As the control, pristine graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) was also prepared using only DCDA under the same condition.

Photoelectrochemical experiments

were performed in a conventional three-electrode cell with a platinum wire as the auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) as the reference electrode on a CHI 650A workstation (USA). A solar simulator (AM 1.5G, Peccell, Japan) was used as the light source. The light energy density in the vicinity of the photoelectrodes was measured by a USHIO energy meter (USR-40D-B, Japan) to be ca. 84 mW/cm2 (200–800 nm). The photoelectrode (working electrode, 0.49 cm2) was inserted in a 0.1 M KCl aqueous solution with the glass side facing the incident light (to eliminate the influence from the slight variation of film-thickness). The photoelectrode was prepared by spreading aqueous slurries of various carbon nitride solids on ITO glass (10 ohm/cm2) with a glass rod, using adhesive tapes as spaces. It was dried in air and then annealed at 150°C for 10 min. The suspension was prepared by grinding 5 mg of carbon nitride solids, 10 μL of PEDOT-PSS (Sigma-Aldrich, 1.3–1.7%) aqueous solution and 50 μL of water. For incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) measurement, the monochromatic light was generated by a 500 W Xe lamp (USHIO Optical Modulex X500, Japan) with a monochromator (M10, JASCO, Japan), and the energy of the monochromatic light was measured by USHIO energy meter. The IPCE was calculated by normalizing the photocurrent values for incident light energy and intensity by use of the equation, i.e., IPCE(%) = 100*1240*Ipc/(Iinc*λ) where Ipc is photocurrent (A/cm2), Iinc is the incident light intensity (W/cm2) and λ is the wavelength (nm).

Characterization

Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) spectra were collected with a Nicolet 4700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo, USA), equipped with an attenuated total reflection (ATR) setup. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a RINT-ultra3 diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, Rigaku, Japan). The SEM images were measured on a Hatachi SU-8000 (2 kV, Japan). TEM images were obtained on a JEM2100F (200 kV, Japan). UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2500PC UV-vis spectrometer with a diffuse reflectance accessory, and BaSO4 was used as the reference sample (100% reflectance). X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were performed in a Theta probe (Thermo Fisher) using monochromated Al Kα X-rays at hυ = 1486.6 eV. TGA measurements were performed on SII Exstar 6000 (TG-DTA 6200) in air (50 mL/min, 10°C/min). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area was obtained by nitrogen sorption experiments using a Quantachrome Autosorb Automated Gas Sorption System at 77 K. Elemental analysis was undertaken by Carbon/Sulfur Determinator (LECO Co., CS-444LS) that equips with induction furnace, infrared absorption detector, and uses CaCO3 as the standard sample, and Oxygen/Nitrogen Determinator (LECO Co., TC-436AR) that equips with impulse furnace and thermal conductivity detector, and Si3N4 as the standard sample. Electronic spin resonance (ESR) spectra were obtained on JEOL JES-FA200 Electron Spin Resonance Spectrometer at 4.2 K.

Author Contributions

Y.Z. designed the experiment and carried out synthesis of materials and performed SEM/XPS/ESR/BET/FT-IR/XRD/UV-vis/TGA/elemental analysis. Z.S. performed and interpreted TEM experiments. Y.Z. carried out photoelectrochemical experiments with guidance from J.C., S.O. and Y.L. J.Y. and S.L. provided guidance and discussion. Y.Z. and Z.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFO

srep02163-s1.pdf (606.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, NSF of Jiangsu province (BK2012317, BK2011591), China, National Natural Science Foundation of China (21203023, 21005016), Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up (No. KA004) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the International Center for Young Scientists, National Institute for Materials Science, Japan. The authors thank FMC Biopolymer for samples of alginate.

References

  1. Fujishima A. & Honda K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grätzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414, 338–344 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Thomas A. et al. Graphitic carbon nitride materials: variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 4893–4908 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang Y., Mori T. & Ye J. Polymeric Carbon Nitrides: Semiconducting Properties and Emerging Applications in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrochemical Energy Conversion. Sci. Adv. Mater. 4, 282–291 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang X. C. et al. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nature Mater. 8, 76–80 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yan S. C., Li Z. S. & Zou Z. G. Photodegradation Performance of g-C3N4 Fabricated by Directly Heating Melamine. Langmuir 25, 10397–10401 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang Y. J. & Antonietti M. Photocurrent Generation by Polymeric Carbon Nitride Solids: An Initial Step towards a Novel Photovoltaic System. Chem.-Asian J. 5, 1307–1311 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Datta K. K. R., Reddy B. V. S., Ariga K. & Vinu A. Gold Nanoparticles Embedded in Mesoporous Carbon Nitride Stabilizer for Highly Efficient Three-Component Coupling Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5961–5965 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zheng Y. et al. Nanoporous Graphitic-C3N4@Carbon Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20116–20119 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Xiang Q., Yu J. & Jaroniec M. Preparation and Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic H2-Production Activity of Graphene/C3N4 Composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 7355–7363 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wirnhier E. et al. Poly(triazine imide) with Intercalation of Lithium and Chloride Ions [(C3N3)2 (NHxLi1−x)3·LiCl]: A Crystalline 2D Carbon Nitride Network. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 3213–3221 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang Y. J., Thomas A., Antonietti M. & Wang X. C. Activation of carbon nitride solids by protonation: Morphology changes, enhanced ionic conductivity, and photoconduction experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 50–51 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu G. et al. Unique Electronic Structure Induced High Photoreactivity of Sulfur-Doped Graphitic C3N4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11642–11648 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang Y. J., Mori T., Ye J. H. & Antonietti M. Phosphorus-Doped Carbon Nitride Solid: Enhanced Electrical Conductivity and Photocurrent Generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6294–6295 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang Y., Li H., Yao J., Wang X. & Antonietti M. Synthesis of boron doped polymeric carbon nitride solids and their use as metal-free catalysts for aliphatic C–H bond oxidation. Chem. Sci. 2, 446 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho S. et al. A Thermally Stable Semiconducting Polymer. Adv. Mater. 22, 1253–1257 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo Y., Chu S., Yan S., Wang Y. & Zou Z. Developing a polymeric semiconductor photocatalyst with visible light response. Chem. Commun. 46, 7325 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yan S. C., Li Z. S. & Zou Z. G. Photodegradation of Rhodamine B and Methyl Orange over Boron-Doped g-C3N4 under Visible Light Irradiation. Langmuir 26, 3894–3901 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Y. et al. Excellent Visible-Light Photocatalysis of Fluorinated Polymeric Carbon Nitride Solids. Chem. Mater. 22, 5119–5121 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang Y., Mori T., Niu L. & Ye J. Non-covalent doping of graphitic carbon nitride polymer with graphene: controlled electronic structure and enhanced optoelectronic conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4517 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang J. et al. Co-Monomer Control of Carbon Nitride Semiconductors to Optimize Hydrogen Evolution with Visible Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 3183–3187 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vinu A. Two-Dimensional Hexagonally-Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Nitrides with Tunable Pore Diameter, Surface Area and Nitrogen Content. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 816–827 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee E. Z., Jun Y.-S., Hong W. H., Thomas A. & Jin M. M. Cubic Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon(IV) Nitride: An All-in-One Chemosensor for Selective Optical Sensing of Metal Ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9706–9710 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goettmann F., Fischer A., Antonietti M. & Thomas A. Chemical synthesis of mesoporous carbon nitrides using hard templates and their use as a metal-free catalyst for friedel-crafts reaction of benzene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 4467–4471 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li X.-H. et al. Condensed Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanorods by Nanoconfinement: Promotion of Crystallinity on Photocatalytic Conversion. Chem. Mater. 23, 4344–4348 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kailasam K., Epping J. D., Thomas A., Losse S. & Junge H. Mesoporous carbon nitride–silica composites by a combined sol–gel/thermal condensation approach and their application as photocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4668 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang X. C. et al. Polymer Semiconductors for Artificial Photosynthesis: Hydrogen Evolution by Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1680–1681 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schnepp Z. Biopolymers as a Flexible Resource for Nanochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 1096 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tingaut P., Zimmermann T. & Sèbe G. Cellulose nanocrystals and microfibrillated cellulose as building blocks for the design of hierarchical functional materials. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 20105 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  30. Walsh D., Arcelli L., Ikoma T., Tanaka J. & Mann S. Dextran templating for the synthesis of metallic and metal oxide sponges. Nature Mater. 2, 386–390 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Laurent S. et al. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 108, 2064–2110 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Raveendran P., Fu J. & Wallen S. L. Completely “Green” Synthesis and Stabilization of Metal Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13940–13941 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarma T. K. & Chattopadhyay A. Starch-Mediated Shape-Selective Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles with Tunable Longitudinal Plasmon Resonance. Langmuir 20, 3520–3524 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Walsh D., Wimbush S. C. & Hall S. R. Use of the Polysaccharide Dextran as a Morphological Directing Agent in the Synthesis of High-TcSuperconducting YBa2Cu3O7-δ Sponges with Improved Critical Current Densities. Chem. Mater. 19, 647–649 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  35. Ganesan R. & Gedanken A. Synthesis of WO3 nanoparticles using a biopolymer as a template for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nanotechnology 19, 025702 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xia Y. et al. Biotemplated fabrication of hierarchically porous NiO/C composite from lotus pollen grains for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 9209 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas A., Goettmann F. & Antonietti M. Hard Templates for Soft Materials: Creating Nanostructured Organic Materials. Chem. Mater. 20, 738–755 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang Y., Wang X. C., Antonietti M. & Zhang Y. J. Facile One-Pot Synthesis of Nanoporous Carbon Nitride Solids by Using Soft Templates. ChemSusChem 3, 435–439 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yan H. Soft-templating synthesis of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light. Chem. Commun. 48, 3430 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mor G. K. et al. p-Type Cu−Ti−O Nanotube Arrays and Their Use in Self-Biased Heterojunction Photoelectrochemical Diodes for Hydrogen Generation. Nano Lett. 8, 1906–1911 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Paracchino A., Laporte V., Sivula K., Grätzel M. & Thimsen E. Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nature Mater. 10, 456–461 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wolcott A., Smith W. A., Kuykendall T. R., Zhao Y. & Zhang J. Z. Photoelectrochemical Study of Nanostructured ZnO Thin Films for Hydrogen Generation from Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1849–1856 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu M., Da P., Wu H., Zhao D. & Zheng G. Controlled Sn-Doping in TiO2 Nanowire Photoanodes with Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Conversion. Nano Lett. 12, 1503–1508 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhong D. K., Sun J., Inumaru H. & Gamelin D. R. Solar Water Oxidation by Composite Catalyst/α-Fe2O3 Photoanodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6086–6087 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin Y., Zhou S., Sheehan S. W. & Wang D. Nanonet-Based Hematite Heteronanostructures for Efficient Solar Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 2398–2401 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thimsen E., Le Formal F., Grätzel M. & Warren S. C. Influence of Plasmonic Au Nanoparticles on the Photoactivity of Fe2O3 Electrodes for Water Splitting. Nano Lett. 11, 35–43 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Su J., Guo L., Bao N. & Grimes C. A. Nanostructured WO3/BiVO4 Heterojunction Films for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Nano Lett. 11, 1928–1933 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Odobel F., Le Pleux L. C., Pellegrin Y. & Blart E. New Photovoltaic Devices Based on the Sensitization of p-type Semiconductors: Challenges and Opportunities. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 1063–1071 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFO

srep02163-s1.pdf (606.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES