Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2013 Jun 21;110(27):10882–10883. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309965110

Excessive activation of tissue plasminogen activator makes a mouse nervous

Dan Goldowitz 1,1
PMCID: PMC3704036  PMID: 23792578

In an experimental tour de force, using a series of cell and molecular biological approaches, Li et al. (1) identify the mis-expression of the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) protein as the causal basis for the cerebellar phenotype of the nervous (allele symbol, nr) mutant mouse. The original full report of the nervous mutant showed a dramatic loss of Purkinje cells in the lateral cerebellum and a significant, but attenuated, loss in the midline cerebellum (2). The loss of Purkinje cells was precipitous from postnatal day 23–50 and the Purkinje cells that survived remained into adulthood (3).

Early work from the laboratory of Nick Seeds identified early postnatal expression of tPA in granule cells and a role for tPA in cerebellar development that focused on granule cell migration using the tPA KO mouse (4). The ontogeny of later expression of tPA in cerebellar Purkinje cells was unexplored, and any possible connection with the nr mouse was not made, although the induction of tPA was seen in Purkinje cells after motor learning (5). The mutant gene had been mapped to mouse chromosome 8 (6), but no genomic data had pinpointed the affected gene. The story largely stopped there until the Sidman laboratory reentered the exploration of the nervous mutant and found that a gene product, tPA, whose gene was located in this region, was expressed at 10-fold higher amounts in the mutant cerebellum (7). The current Li et al. paper provides significant information that points more definitively at tPA as the causal molecule for the nervous phenotype.

Pathways from tPA Overexpression to Purkinje Cell Death

From one perspective, cell biologists and biochemists will find in this article three diverse pathways linked together by tPA, all involved in the development and survival of Purkinje cells. The work of Li et al. and previous efforts from this group provide convincing evidence that the nervous allele acts as a gain-of-function mutation of the Plat (plasminogen activator, tissue) gene. However, lacking the genomic data to validate this point, the authors apply an impressive, multipronged approach to reach this conclusion. They use single cell transcript profiling, quantitative ultrastructural analysis of synapses and mitochondria, cerebellar organotypic slice and dissociated Purkinje cell cultures, double mutant nr:tPA-null mice, injection of tPA into WT neonatal cerebellar cortex, and lentiviral

The current Li et al. paper provides significant information that points more definitively at tPA as the causal molecule for the nervous phenotype.

vector-based shRNA knockdown toward the analysis of enzymatic dynamics, dendritic tree quantification, parallel fiber synaptic contacts with Purkinje cells, and mitochondrial anatomy and function to demonstrate that three molecular pathways downstream of tPA/plasmin-based proteolysis affect postnatal Purkinje cell development and survival. Likely the most incapacitating is the decreased membrane potential and enlargement of mitochondria and loss of integrity of the plasma membrane. Both of these events are linked to the production of excess kringle 5, a product of plasminogen proteolysis, that binds to voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) and diminishes VDAC1 function and/or localization. A second pathway that is impacted by the nervous mutation is tPA inhibition of dendritic growth through the activation of protein kinase Cγ and microtubule-associated protein 2 phosphorylation. A final pathway that results in a deficit of parallel fiber–Purkinje cell synapses specifically involves a blockade of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and signaling through its tyrosine kinase receptor B.

What emerges are unappreciated views that the nervous mutant now reveals, such as a dissociation between dendritogenesis and synaptogenesis as seen by finding that BDNF can correct the deficits in synaptogenesis but not in dendritogenesis and the primal role of VDAC1’s interaction with kringle 5, a proteolytic peptide of plasminogen, in the nr phenotype of Purkinje cell death.

Neurological Mutant Mice and the Genetics of Nervous System Development and Function

From a second perspective, this work on the nervous mutant mouse serves as a reminder of how the availability of spontaneous and induced mutations in the mouse helped catapult this species into its preeminent role as a preclinical model. The nervous mutant mouse arose in a colony of mice at the Jackson Laboratories and was reported in one of the early compendiums of mutations in the mouse (8). As with many mutations found at the Jackson Laboratories, nervous fostered a cottage industry in its use that involved multiple avenues of research that included neuron–glia interactions (9) and the stabilization of synaptic contacts (10). These mutant mouse strains were the byproducts of a fruitful collaboration between the Jackson Laboratories and Richard Sidman’s research group at Boston Children’s Hospital. This highly productive relationship between the Jackson Laboratories and Richard Sidman is epitomized in their classic Catalog of the Neurological Mutants of the Mouse (11). From this catalog came some of the classic mutations that were to lay the groundwork for mammalian neurogenetics and provide the genetic keys for some of the molecular events in neurodevelopment such as migration and synaptogenesis.

Only a few of the mice noted in the catalog have evaded genetic discovery, and they likely speak to the complexities of the genome. A recent example of the finding of the Danforth’s short-tail mutation (Sd), which had evaded discovery of the mutant gene for many years, illustrates where the nervous mutation may lie. Three reports converged on the identification of a retrotransposon insertion over 12 kb upstream to the start site of the Ptf1a gene as the causal basis of the Sd mutation (12). The insertional mutation caused ectopic expression of the Ptf1a gene, which gave rise to the phenotype of the mutant. The question posed by Hamilton may be apropos to the nervous mutant. “The discovery of the Sd mutation after so many decades might also prompt us to ask how often regulatory mutations might account for the remaining classical alleles that have been refractory to intragenic-centered analysis and exome sequencing.” The current data on the nervous mutant are consistent with an upstream, homozygous perturbation of the Plat gene that would lead to the unbridled expression of tPA. Many questions exist that can only be answered with the finding of the genetic lesion responsible for nervous.

In the meantime, however, this report by Li et al. (1) shines light on an old mutation that could yield new truths about nervous system development and function. For example, there is an interesting convergence between the studies from the Seeds’ laboratory that have shown a role for tPA and learning and memory and a study from the Thompson laboratory that has demonstrated a pivotal role of the cerebellum in eyeblink conditioning (13). Might the nervous mutant provide an experimental model to provide a systems approach to the role of Purkinje cells in a learned response? Another interesting point of convergence is a second identified substrate of tPA activity: hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) (14). The receptor for this substrate is Met (previously known as the c-met proto-oncogene), which has been shown to be important for cerebellar development (15) and a gene that has been associated with autism (16). Might the nervous mutant provide a further link between cerebellar pathogenesis and the etiology of autism spectrum disorder (17)?

Footnotes

The author declares no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page E2410 of issue 26 in volume 110.

References

  • 1.Li J, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator regulates Purkinje neuron development and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(26):E2410–E2419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305010110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sidman R, Green M. In: Les Mutants Pathologiques Chez L'animal. Sabourdy M, editor. Paris: CNRS; 1970. pp. 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Landis SC. Histochemical demonstration of mitochondrial dehydrogenases in developing normal and nervous mutant mouse Purkinje cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1975;23(2):136–143. doi: 10.1177/23.2.1117128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seeds NW, Basham ME, Haffke SP. Neuronal migration is retarded in mice lacking the tissue plasminogen activator gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(24):14118–14123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.14118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seeds NW, Williams BL, Bickford PC. Tissue plasminogen activator induction in Purkinje neurons after cerebellar motor learning. Science. 1995;270(5244):1992–1994. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Jager PL, Harvey D, Polydorides AD, Zuo J, Heintz N. A high-resolution genetic map of the nervous locus on mouse chromosome 8. Genomics. 1998;48(3):346–353. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.5193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li J, et al. Purkinje neuron degeneration in nervous (nr) mutant mice is mediated by a metabolic pathway involving excess tissue plasminogen activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(20):7847–7852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602440103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Green M. New mutant-nervous (nr) Mouse News Lett. 1967;37:33. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fisher M. Neuronal influence on glial enzyme expression: Evidence from mutant mouse cerebella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81(14):4414–4418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sotelo C, Triller A. Fate of presynaptic afferents to Purkinje cells in the adult nervous mutant mouse: A model to study presynaptic stabilization. Brain Res. 1979;175(1):11–36. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90511-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sidman R, Green M, Appel S. Catalog of the Neurological Mutants of the Mouse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press; 1965. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamilton BA. Retrotransposon activates ectopic Ptf1 expression: A short tail. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20(4):177–181. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mars WM, Zarnegar R, Michalopoulos GK. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor by the plasminogen activators uPA and tPA. Am J Pathol. 1993;143(3):949–958. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ieraci A, Forni PE, Ponzetto C. Viable hypomorphic signaling mutant of the Met receptor reveals a role for hepatocyte growth factor in postnatal cerebellar development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(23):15200–15205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222362099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campbell DB, et al. A genetic variant that disrupts MET transcription is associated with autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(45):16834–16839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605296103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fatemi SH, et al. Consensus paper: Pathological role of the cerebellum in autism. Cerebellum. 2012;11(3):777–807. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0355-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES