Skip to main content
BMC Neuroscience logoLink to BMC Neuroscience
. 2013 Jul 8;14(Suppl 1):P60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P60

Beyond dynamical mean-field theory of neural networks

Massimiliano Muratori 1,, Bruno Cessac 1
PMCID: PMC3704715

We consider a set of N firing rate neurons with discrete time dynamics and a leak term γ. The nonlinearity of the sigmoid is controlled by a parameter g and each neuron has a firing threshold θ, Gaussian distributed (thresholds are uncorrelated). The network is fully connected with correlated Gaussian random synaptic weights, with mean zero and covariance matrix C/N. When synaptic weights are uncorrelated the dynamic mean field theory developed in [1-3] allows us to draw the bifurcation diagram of the model in the thermodynamic limit (N tending to infinity): in particular there is sharp transition from fixed point to chaos characterized by the maximum Lyapunov exponent, which is known analytically in the thermodynamic limit. The bifurcation diagram is drawn in Figure 1 A. However, mean-field theory is exact only in the thermodynamic limit and when synaptic weights are uncorrelated. What are the deviations from mean-field theory observed when one departs from these hypotheses? We have first studied the finite size dynamics. For finite N the maximal Lyapunov exponent has a plateau at 0 corresponding to a transition to chaos by quasi-periodicity where dynamics is at the edge of chaos (Figure 1 B). This plateau disappears in the thermodynamic limit. Thus, mean-field theory neglects an important finite-sized effect since neuronal dynamics at the edge of chaos has strong implications on learning performances of the network [4]. We also studied the effect of a weak correlation (of amplitude ε) on dynamics. Even, when ε is small one detects an important deviation on the maximal Lyapunov exponent (Figure 1 C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Bifurcation map. 1 : one stable fixed point; 2 two stable fixed points; 3 one fixed point and one strange attractor; 4 one strange attractor. (B) Finite N and Mean-Field Maximal Lyapunov exponent (θ = 0.1, γ = 0). (C) Finite N Maximal Lyapunov exponent with weak correlation (ε = 0.01 and Mean-Field Maximal Lyapunov Exponent without correlation (ε = 0).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by INRIA, ERC-NERVI number 227747, KEOPS ANR-CONICYT and European Union Project # FP7-269921 (BrainScales), Renvision grant agreement N 600847 and Mathemacs FP7-ICT_2011.9.7.

References

  1. Cessac B, Doyon B, Quoy M, Samuelides M. Mean-field equations, bifurcation map and route to chaos in discrete time neural networks. Physica D. 1994;74:24–44. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(94)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cessac B. Increase in Complexity in Random Neural Networks. J Phys I France. 1995;5:409–432. doi: 10.1051/jp1:1995135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moynot O, Samuelides M. Large deviations and mean-field theory for asymmetric random recurrent neural networks. Probability Theory and Related Fields. 2002;123:41–75. doi: 10.1007/s004400100182. Springer-Verlag. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Legenstein R, Maass W. Edge of Chaos and Prediction of Computational Performance for Neural Circuit Models. Neural Networks. 2007;20:323–334. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES