Abstract
The outer membrane protein (OMP) TolC is the cell surface component of several drug efflux pumps that are responsible for bacterial resistance against a variety of antibiotics. In this research, we investigated the effects of OMP TolC on E. coli transport within saturated sands through column experiments using a wide type E. coli K12 strain (with OMP TolC), as well as the corresponding transposon mutant (tolC∷kan) and the markerless deletion mutant (ΔtolC). Our results showed OMP TolC could significantly enhance the transport of E. coli when the ionic strength was 20 mM NaCl or higher. The deposition rate coefficients for the wild type E. coli strain (with OMP TolC) was usually >50% lower than those of the tolC-negative mutants. The measurements of contact angles using three probe liquids suggested that TolC altered the surface tension components of E. coli cells and lead to lower Hamaker constants for the cell-water-sand system. The interaction energy calculations using the extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (XDLVO) theory suggested that the deposition of the E. coli cell primarily occurred at the secondary energy minimum. The depth of the secondary energy minimum increased with ionic strength, and was greater for the TolC-deletion strains under high ionic strength conditions. Overall, the transport behavior of three E. coli strain within saturated sands could be explained by the XDLVO calculations. Results from this research suggested that antibiotic resistant bacteria expressing OMP TolC could spread more widely within sandy aquifers.
1. Introduction
Groundwater accounts for ∼48% of global drinking water supply 1. Groundwater, however, is susceptible to microbial contamination 2-4. It was reported that since 1920, about 50% of the waterborne disease outbreaks in the US were caused by contaminated, untreated or inadequately treated groundwater 4. Each year, groundwater contamination is responsible for an estimated 750,000 to 5.9 million illnesses and 1400-9400 deaths in the US 2. A thorough understanding of the transport of microbial cells within groundwater systems is essential to the assessment of the public health risks associated with groundwater microbial contamination as well as the design, evaluation and implementation of appropriate mitigation measures.
The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella is comprised of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), proteins and filamentous structures such as fimbriae/pili and flagella 5. Several recent studies suggested that various bacterial surface structures could significantly influence the transport behavior of bacterial cells by affecting the attachment of the cells to aquifer solid matrix 6-11. Haznedaroglu et al. 11 reported that flagella could enhance the deposition of Salmonella enterica and thus lower its mobility within quartz sands. For E. coli O157:H7, Kim et al. 9, 10 observed that the surface macromolecules such as LPS could alter cell surface properties, cell-solid energy interactions and subsequently cell transport behavior in saturated porous media. Lutterodt et al. 8 suggested that the positive charges originating from OMP Ag43 could promote the attachment of E. coli cells to the negatively-charged quartz surfaces and lower their mobility within quartz sands. Walczak et al. 6, 7 showed that tetracycline-resistant and tetracycline-susceptible E. coli strains that were isolated from various environmental sources displayed distinct OMP profiles and the tetracycline-resistant E. coli strains consistently showed higher mobility within saturated quartz sands. The OMP TolC, which has a molecular mass of ∼52 kDa, was identified as a potential factor in reducing the deposition of E. coli to the surface of quartz sands. The recent studies on the relationship between cell outer membrane protein and transport within saturated porous media, however, were usually quantitative and speculative 6-8.
TolC is the membrane component of several types of multidrug efflux pumps (e.g., the AcrAB-TolC pump), which are responsible for bacterial resistance to a variety of antibiotics such as tetracycline, erythromycin and ampicillin 12-15. The possibility that TolC could enhance the mobility of bacterial cells within the saturated porous media has broad environmental implications with regard to the spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria within groundwater aquifers and warrants further investigation. The primary goal of this research is to quantify the effects of OMP TolC on the transport of E. coli within saturated sands in an unambiguous manner using TolC-deletion mutants. The XDLVO theory was then applied to examine how OMP TolC influenced E. coli mobility through altering the energy interactions between the E. coli cells and the surface of sands.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 The E. coli strains
In this research, the wild type strain was E. coli K12 (strain W25113), which was used to make the Keio Collection of single-gene knockouts 16. The strain JW5503 (tolC∷kan) was obtained from the Keio collection: in this strain the tolC open reading frame was replaced with a kanamycin cassette (amplified from plasmid pKD13) flanked by FLP recombination sites 16. To construct the markerless deletion of tolC (i.e., to excise kanamycin resistance), E. coli JW5503 was transformed with plasmid pCP20 and the kanamycin resistant colonies were selected at 30°C. pCP20 has temperature sensitive replication and thermal induction of FLP recombinase expression 17, 18. The transformants were cultured at 43°C, after which the loss of both pCP20 and the kanamycin resistance cassette were confirmed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ampicillin/kanamycin sensitivity testing. The markerless strain lacking TolC was referred to as ΔtolC.
The E. coli cells preserved in 20% glycerol under −80°C was streaked onto Luria-Bertani (LB) (Fisher Scientific) agar plates. After overnight incubation at 37°C, cells from a freshly formed colony were transferred to culture tubes containing 15 ml LB broth. The culture tubes were shaken at 90 rpm and incubated at 37°C for 6 hours. The starter culture was used to inoculate LB broth (1:500 dilution ratio). Following the incubation at 37°C for 18 hours on an orbital shaker (90 rpm), the E. coli cells were harvested by centrifugation (4000 × g, 10 minutes, 4°C). To remove the growth medium, the bacterial pellet was rinsed 4 times with the appropriate electrolyte solution. The concentration of cells was then adjusted to ∼ 4 × 107 cell/ml for the column transport experiments. The pH of the cell suspensions was ∼5.7.
2.2 Column transport experiments
The silica sands used for the column experiments were purchased from US Silica and had a size range of 0.210-0.297 mm. The sands received from the manufacturer were alternately cleaned using concentrated nitric acid to remove metal hydroxides and diluted NaOH solution to remove natural clay particles 19, rinsed with deionized water and dried at 80 °C. The porosity of the sand was 0.37 as determined using the bulk density method 20.
A pair of glass chromatography columns (Kontes, Vineland, NJ) measuring 15 cm in length and 2.5 cm in diameter were vertically oriented and then wet-packed with the clean silica sands. Care was taken to eliminate the possibility of trapped air bubbles. Once packed, >30 pore volumes (PV) of appropriate background electrolyte (i.e., 1, 5, 20, 50 or 100 mM NaCl) was injected into the columns to equilibrate them. The downward flow was driven by gravity and the Darcy velocity was maintained at 0.31 cm/min using peristaltic pumps (MasterFlex, Vernon Hills, IL). The flow velocity that was employed in the column experiments is on the high end of natural groundwater flow, and is on the same order of magnitude as that encountered in riverbank filtration 21.
Upon the completion of the equilibration step, the transport experiments were initiated by injecting the E. coli cell suspensions to the top of the columns and concentrations of the bacterial cells in the effluent were determined through measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 220 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1700 spectrophotometer. The injection of E. coli cell suspension (∼3.5 PV) lasted for 60 min, after which the columns were flushed with bacteria-free background electrolyte solution until the absorbance of effluent returned to the background values.
The clean-bed deposition rate coefficients (kd) of the E. coli cells within the saturated sand packs were estimated from the steady-state breakthrough concentrations in the effluent 22-24:
(1) |
where ε is porosity, υ is the specific discharge, L is the column length and C/C0 is the normalized breakthrough concentration relevant to clean-bed conditions, which was obtained from the average bacterial breakthrough concentrations between 1.8-2.0 PV 22,24.
The retained E. coli cells can be remobilized when the ionic strength of the solution is lowered 25. For each E. coli strain, upon the completion of the column experiments using 100 mM NaCl, the 1 mM NaCl solution was injected to the columns and the concentrations of the released E. coli cells were monitored similarly using the spectrophotometer. The results obtained were used to evaluate the reversibility of E. coli retention within the sand packs.
2.3 XDLVO calculations
The mobility of E. coli cells within the saturated sands is determined by the energy interactions between the cells and the surface of the sands. According to the XDLVO theory, the energy interactions between the E. coli cells and the surface of quartz sands are the summation of the Lifshitz–van der Waals (LW) interaction, the electrostatic double layer (EDL) interaction and the Lewis acid-base (AB) interaction:
(2) |
The LW, EDL and AB interaction energies (ΦLW,ΦEDL and ΦAB) for the cell-sand (sphere-plate geometry) system can be calculated using the following equations 25-32:
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
where A is the Hamaker constant; ab is the radius of the bacterial cells; λ is the characteristic wavelength and was set as 42.5 nm; h is the separation distance between the cell and sand surface; ε0 is the dielectric permittivity of vacuum, εw is the dielectric constant of water; κ−1 is the Debye length( nm at 22°C, I=ionic strength); Ψb and Ψs are the surface potentials of the bacterial cells and sand, respectively; λw (= 0.6 nm) is the characteristic decay length of AB interactions in water; h0 represents the minimum equilibrium distance between the cell and sand surface due to Born repulsion and equals to 0.157 nm; and represents the hydrophobicity interaction free energies per unit area corresponding to h0.
The values of ab, Ψb, Ψs, A and were required for the interaction energy calculations. To determine cell sizes (ab), images of the E. coli cells suspended in 1 and 100 mM NaCl were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope that was equipped with a Photometric CoolSnap ES digital camera and MetaMorph software. The length and width of ∼ 30 cells were determined using the ImageJ software and the equivalent radii of the cells were calculated as where Lc and Wc represent the length and width of the cell, respectively 33, 34. In this research, zeta potential values were used in place of surface potentials for the XDLVO calculations 35. E. coli cell suspensions were prepared in a similar fashion as the column transport experiments and the quartz sands were pulverized and the colloid-sized quartz particles were suspended in the NaCl solutions 36. The zeta potential values of the bacterial cells and quartz particles were then measured using a ZetaPALS analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation).
The Hamaker constants were calculated from the LW surface tension parameters of bacteria Water and sand 37:
(6) |
The values of can be obtained from the electron-accepting (γ+) and electron-donating (γ−) surface tension parameters37:
(7) |
where the subscripts of b, w and s represent bacteria, water and sand, respectively. For water, the values of , and are 21.8, 25.5 and 25.5 mJ m−2, respectively 38. For quartz sands, the previously reported values of (39.2 mJ m−2), (1.4 mJ m−2) and (47.8 mJ m−2) were used in this research 32. To determine the values of and for each E. coli strain, bacterial lawns were produced by filtering cells onto porous membrane, which was subsequently dried at room temperature for ∼15 minutes. The contact angles (θ) of two polar and one non-polar probe liquids with known surface tension parameters on the bacterial lawns were measured using a Rame-Hart goniometer 26, 32, 37:
(8) |
where the subscript i represents water (γL=72.8, γLW=21.8 and γ+=γ− = 25.5 mJ m−2), glycerol (γL=64.0, γLW=34.0, γ+= 3.92 and γ−=57.4 mJ m−2) or diiodomethane (γL=50.8, γLW=50.8 and γ+=γ− = 0 mJ m−2) 37, respectively.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Column transport experiments
The normalized effluent E. coli concentrations under various ionic strength conditions are shown in Figure 1 (left panels). For all the E. coli strains, the increase in ionic strength led to lower breakthrough concentrations and lower recovery of bacterial cells in the effluent. For instance, the breakthrough concentrations (between 1.8-2.0 PV) of the wild type strain decreased from 87.0(±1.7)% to 11.2(±0.6)% when ionic strength increased from 1 mM to 100 mM. Accordingly, integration of the breakthrough curves showed that 86.3(±2.9)% and 12.8(±0.6)% of the wild type E. coli cells traveled through the sand columns under 1 and 100 mM NaCl conditions, respectively.
Figure 1.
Breakthrough curves of (A) wild type, (B) tolC∷kan and (C) ΔTolC E. coli cells suspended in 1, 5, 20, 50 and 100 mM NaCl, respectively (left panels). C represents E. coli concentrations in the effluent and C0 represents influent E. coli concentrations. Upon the completion of the 100 mM NaCl experiments, the 1 mM NaCl solution was injected to the columns and the release kinetics of the previously retained bacterial cells are shown in the right panels.
Upon the completion of the column experiments using 100 mM NaCl, the 1 mM NaCl solution was injected into the columns and the concentrations of the released E. coli cells were monitored (Figure 1, right panels). The pulse-type release of the previously retained E. coli cells led to extremely high cell concentrations in the effluent. Integration of the release curves showed that, at the end of the release experiments, 28.0(±2.6)%, 50.9(±7.8)% and 60.4(±0.5)% of the cells remained immobilized for the for the wild type, tolC∷kan and ΔtolC E. coli strains, respectively. In comparison, the column experiments performed using 1 mM NaCl showed that ∼13.7(±2.9)%, 9.4(±0.9)% and 11.7(±1.7)% of the wild type, tolC∷kan and ΔtolC cells were retained, respectively. The fact that higher fractions of the cells remained retained following the release experiments suggested that cell immobilization was only partially reversible.
The clean-bed deposition rate coefficients (kd) were calculated from the early breakthrough concentrations using equation (1) (Figure 2). Student's t-test performed using Microsoft Excel showed that the deposition rate coefficients were similar (p>0.05) for the tolC∷kan and ΔtolC strains under all ionic strength conditions (1-100 mM NaCl). This indicated that the insertion of the kanamycin resistance cassette into E. coli chromosome and the gain of kanamycin resistance had little effects on the mobility of E. coli within saturated quartz sands. When the ionic strength was between 1-5 mM, the wild type E. coli strain also had similar kd values as the TolC-deletion E. coli strains (Student's t-test, p > 0.05). The removal of OMP TolC, however, led to significant increase in values of kd (i.e., decrease in E. coli mobility) when the ionic strength was between 20 and 100 mM (Student's t-test, p < 0.05). This finding was consistent to previously published results that suggested that OMP TolC could enhance the transport of E. coli isolated from various natural sources such as dairy manure 6, 7. To elucidate the mechanisms behind the effects of OMP TolC on the mobility of E. coli, we characterized the E. coli cells and examined the energy interactions between the E. coli cells and quartz sands using the XDLVO theory.
Figure 2.
Average deposition rate coefficients (kd) for the three E. coli strains under ionic strength conditions of 1, 5, 20, 50 and 100 mM. The error bars, which represent the standard deviations, are usually smaller than the symbols.
3.2 Cell characterization
Results from the cell size measurements under 1 and 100 mM NaCl conditions suggested that ionic strength had minimal effects (Student's t-test, p > 0.05) on the size of the E. coli cells. For instance, the equivalent diameter of the wild type E. coli cells was 2.04(±0.19) μm in 1 mM NaCl and 2.01(±0.17) μm in 100 mM NaCl, respectively. For each E. coli strain, all the size measurements were thus pooled together and a single diameter value was calculated. The average sizes of the wild type, tolC∷kan and ΔtolC strains were 2.04(±0.19) μm, 1.98(±0.22) μm and 2.02(±0.17) μm, respectively. The results from Student's t-test indicated that the removal of OMP TolC and/or the presence of kanamycin resistance did not significantly alter cell size.
When suspended in 1, 5, 20, 50 and 100 mM NaCl (non-buffered, pH ∼5.7), the zeta potential values of the E. coli cells were negative, suggesting that their surfaces were negatively charged (Figure 3). Given the slightly acidic pH of the cell suspensions, these negative charges should originate from the deprotonation of acid-base functional groups such as carboxylic and phosphoric groups 39. With the increase in ionic strength, the zeta potential values of the E. coli cells generally became less negative due to the compression of the electric double layer 34. Additionally, all three E. coli strains displayed comparable zeta potential values under the same ionic strength conditions (Student's t-test, p > 0.05). The OMP TolC is a 471-residue trimer that contains an α-helical domain, a mixed α/β domain and a β domain 40. The α-helical domain, which forms a tunnel through the periplasm, is anchored to bacterial wall. The β-barrel, which extends to the outside of the outer membrane, has a length of ∼4 nm 40. Because the exterior of the β domain is largely non-polar 40, it is expected that the deletion of TolC from the outer membrane would not significantly alter cell surface charge and zeta potential. Similarly, because the kanamycin resistance in the tolC∷kan strain is conferred by the Tn5 neomycin phosphotransferase, an aminoglycoside modifying enzyme that exists and functions inside the E. coli cell 18,41, the kanamycin resistance had little effect on cell zeta potential.
Figure 3.
Zeta potential values of the E. coli cells and the quartz sands in 1, 5, 20, 50 and 100 mM NaCl. Error bars represent the standard deviation of a minimum of 5 measurements.
The results of the contact angle measurements are shown in Table 1. Student's t-test indicated that there was significant difference (p < 0.05) in the diiodomethane contact angle between the wild type and TolC-deletion E. coli strains. It was interesting to note that the wild type, which was able to produce the non-polar OMP TolC, had a higher contact angle of the non-polar diiodomethane than the two TolC-deletion mutants. Similar trend was observed in Ong et al. 26 and Johanson et al 42. Ong et al. observed E. coli D21f1, which lacks the charge-containing LPS, had a higher contact angle of diiodomethane than the LPS-producing E. coli D21 26. Johanson et al. reported that Enterococcus faecium that produced the hydrophobic enterococcal surface protein (esp) had a higher contact angle of diiodomethane than the corresponding esp-deletion mutant 42. The values of , and for each E. coli strain were then calculated from the contact angle measurements using equation (8) (Table 1). These values, together with the zeta potential values and cell size measurements were then used to quantify the energy interactions between the E. coli cells and the quartz sands.
Table 1.
Contact angle measurements, surface tension components, Hamaker constant (A) and for the three E. coli strains. Numbers in parenthesib<s are the standard deviations of the contact angle measurements.
Properties | Wild type | tolC∷kan | ΔtolC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contact angle (°) (n≥4) | Water | 18.7(±1.4) | 19.0(±3.0) | 19.6(±1.5) | |
Glycerol | 21.4(±8.4) | 25.9(±2.0) | 20.6(±2.8) | ||
Diiodomethane | 67.4(±3.9) | 55.4(±8.7) | 54.1 (±2.8) | ||
Surface tension components (mJ m−2) |
|
24.33 | 31.2 | 32.0 | |
|
6.51 | 3.63 | 4.3 | ||
|
47.93 | 48.3 | 44.8 | ||
Hamaker constant, A (10−21 J) | 0.78 | 2.72 | 2.92 | ||
(mJ m−2) | 23.8 | 26.4 | 23.8 |
3.3 XDLVO energy interactions between E. coli cells and quartz sands
The values of were 23.8 mJ m−2, 26.4 mJ m−2 and 23.8 mJ m−2 and the Hamaker constants were 0.78 × 10−21 J, 2.72 × 10−21 J and 2.92 × 10−21 J for the wild type, tolC∷kan and ΔtolC E. coli strains, respectively (Table 1). The values showed that the AB force between the E. coli cells and the surface of quartz sands was repulsive. Equation (6) suggests that the Hamaker constant is a function of the LW surface tension components of the bacterial cell, water and quartz sands. Because the electron-accepting (γ+) and electron-donating (γ−) surface tension components for diiodomethane are both zero, the LW surface tension parameter for each E. coli strain was calculated from equation (8) that corresponded to diiodomethane. The difference in the Hamaker constants thus was the result of the difference in the diiodomethane contact angles measured on the bacterial lawns of the three E. coli strains. The results obtained in this research indicated that variations in cell surface structures such as OMPs could alter cell surface tension components and subsequently the energy interactions between the cells and the surface of quartz sands. Similar relationship was reported in several previous publications 26, 42. Ong et al. 26, for instance, observed that the wild type E. coli D21 and its LPS-deletion mutant (strain D21f2) had different surface tension values. As a result, for four different types of surfaces (i.e., mica, glass, polystyrene and Teflon), the Hamaker constants for strain D21 were approximately two times the magnitude of the Hamker constants for strain D21f2. Johanson et al. 42 reported that for Enterococcus faecium, the removal of the surface protein esp increased the Hamaker constant for the cell-water-quartz system from 4.2 × 10−21 J to 4.8 × 10−21 J and the value of from 24.1 to 31.4 mJ m−2.
The XDLVO energy interactions between the E. coli cells and the surface of quartz sands were calculated and shown in Figure 4. For all the ionic strength conditions, there existed sizeable energy barriers for the attachment of E. coli cells to quartz sands. The magnitude of the energy barrier was comparable for all three E. coli strains under the same ionic strength condition, but decreased from ∼6.4 × 104 kT to ∼5.4 × 104 kT when the ionic strength increased from 1 mM to 100 mM. The presence of the substantial energy barriers made it difficult for the E. coli cells to be deposited into the primary energy minimum and the immobilization of the E. coli cells should thus occur primarily through their entrapment within the secondary energy minimum 25, 34, 38, 43.
Figure 4.
The calculated XDLVO interaction energy profiles as a function of separation distance for (A) 1 mM, (B) 5 mM, (C) 20 mM, (D) 50 mM and (E) 100 mM ionic strength conditions. The interaction energy was expressed in kT, where k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is absolute temperature in Kelvin. Figure insets show the secondary energy minimum.
When the ionic strength was within 1-5 mM, the three E. coli strains shared similar XDLVO energy interaction profiles (Figures 4A and 4B). For the higher ionic strength range (20-100 mM), the XDLVO calculations showed that the two TolC-deletion strains had similar interaction energy profiles; and their secondary energy minimum was always deeper than the wild type strain. For each E. coli strain, the depth of the secondary energy minimum also increased with ionic strength. The XDLVO calculations were thus consistent to the experimental observations that i) the three E. coli strains had similar mobility under the low ionic strength conditions; ii) the TolC-deletion strains had higher deposition rates than the wild type strain under high ionic strength conditions; and iii) the deposition of the E.coli cells increased with ionic strength (Figure 2). Overall, our data suggested that the deposition rate coefficients (kd) were negatively related to the depth of the secondary energy minimum.
The XDLVO calculations predicted the absence of the secondary minimum for the ionic strength of 1 mM NaCl (Figure 4A). Inspection of the XDLVO interaction energy profiles revealed that the lowest point was ∼0.5 kT. In theory, this indicated that there should be no cell immobilization at the secondary energy minimum. The experimental results showed that the transport of the E. coli cells was not conservative and ∼12% of the E. coli cells were immobilized. Similar discrepancies between the interaction energy calculations and particle transport results were previously reported 29, 44. For instance, Farahat et al. observed that E. coli cells could attach to quartz under pH > 4.5 when the XDLVO energy calculations showed the absence of secondary energy minimum 29. A wide range of factors such as heterogeneity in cell properties (e.g., the zeta potential of some cell might be less negative than the average values), charge heterogeneity and roughness on the surface of quartz sands, XDLVO forces as well as flow hydrodynamics could have contributed to the deposition of a fraction of E. coli cells when the average XDLVO profile predicted the absence of secondary energy minimum 45-48.
The XDLVO calculations were also consistent to the results obtained from the release experiments. When the ionic strength was lowered from 100 mM NaCl to 1 mM, the depth of the secondary energy minimum decreased and a fraction of the E. coli cells that were previously retained was remobilized 25.
Compared to the DLVO theory, the extra force that is considered by the XDLVO theory is the AB force (equation 5). In this research, the AB force was repulsive and the inclusion of this force significantly increased the magnitude of the energy barrier. However, because the AB force decreased more rapidly with the separation distance than the LW and EDL forces, and because the secondary energy minimum was generally located 7 nm or further away from the sand surface, the AB force has very small effects on the depth of the secondary energy minimum. For tolC∷kan, the depth of the secondary energy minimum was −7.34 kT and −7.57 kT for the XDLVO theory and DLVO theory, respectively.
For Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, outer membrane structures such as LPS and proteins can exert steric interactions for the cell-surface system 34, 49. Such steric interactions are not considered by the XDLVO calculations and can significantly influence the transport behavior of bacterial cells within porous media 34. The E. coli K12 strain that was used in this study did not express the O-antigen of the LPS and the length of the LPS was estimated as 3±2 nm 49. The length of OMP TolC that is extended to the outside of the membrane is ∼4 nm 40. The XDLVO calculations showed that the secondary energy minimum was usually located >7 nm from the surface of the sands (Figure 4). Therefore, the steric forces could increase the magnitude of the energy barrier, but should have negligible impact on the location and depth of the secondary minimum. This is confirmed by the calculation of the steric forces using the formula that was derived by Wang et al. 34 (Figure S1).
3.4 Environmental implications
The extensive use of antibiotics in both food animal production and human medicine has led to the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in manure and wastewater 50-53. Many previous studies showed that the improper storage, management and use of wastewater and manure could lead to the contamination of groundwater by a variety of bacteria that were resistant to the major lines of antibiotics that are currently being used to treat human diseases 54, 55. The spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria in the environment is raising serious public health concerns across the world 56, 57.
Drug efflux pumps represent one of the most effective and widespread mechanisms for antibiotic resistance in bacterial cells 58. Particularly, efflux pumps that span the cytoplasm, periplasm and outer membrane could transport antibiotics to the outside environment and therefore lead to bacterial resistance against high levels of antibiotics. The OMP TolC was reported to be the outer membrane component of several common efflux pumps (e.g., the AcrAB-TolC pump) that are responsible for bacterial resistance to various antibiotics such as tetracycline, macrolide and ampicillin 12-15. It was observed that the total dissolved solid (TDS) of groundwater that was influenced by manure storage and application was often 1000 mg/L or higher (20 mM NaCl is equivalent to a TDS of 1170 mg/L) 59. Findings from this research suggested that antibiotic resistant bacteria with the OMP TolC could have higher mobility and display wider spread within sandy aquifers influenced by manure.
Several recent publications highlighted the diversity in the transport behavior of bacterial isolates obtained from various environmental sources within saturated porous media 7, 60-62. Such variations pose challenges to the modeling and prediction of the spread of bacteria within the groundwater system. There is a growing body of evidence, including the findings from this research, which suggests that cell surface structures such as LPS and OMP can have significant impact on the mobility of bacterial cells within aquifer materials 6-8, 35, 42, 63. It is likely that the mechanisms underlying the variations in the transport of environmental bacterial isolates are related to the variations in the cell surface structures 8. The improved understanding of the relationship between the surface structure of bacterial cells and their attachment to natural mineral surfaces could enable us to better assess the public health risks associated with groundwater microbial contamination.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support of this research was provided by University of Wisconsin Groundwater Research Program (WR10R007), NIH (5R00GM083147-04), NSF (CBET-0933230) and UWMRF Research Fellowship. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions led to the improvement of our manuscript.
References
- 1.United Nations. Water in a changing world: the United Nations world water development report. 2009;3:318. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Macler BA, Merkle JC. Current knowledge on groundwater microbial pathogens and their control. Hydrogeology Journal. 2000;8(1):29–40. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Macler BA, Pontius FW. Update on the ground water disinfection rule. Journal American Water Works Association. 1997;89(1):16. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Craun GF, Brunkard JM, Yoder JS, Roberts VA, Carpenter J, Wade T, Calderon RL, Roberts JM, Beach MJ, Roy SL. Causes of Outbreaks Associated with Drinking Water in the United States from 1971 to 2006. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2010;23(3):507–528. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00077-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Madigan MT, Brock TD. Brock biology of microorganisms. 12th. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings; San Francisco, CA: 2009. pp. xxviii–1061. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Walczak JJ, Bardy SL, Feriancikova L, Xu S. Comparison of the Transport of Tetracycline-Resistant and Tetracycline-Susceptible Escherichia coli Isolated from Lake Michigan. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 2011;222(1-4):305–314. doi: 10.1007/s11270-011-0825-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walczak JJ, Bardy SL, Feriancikova L, Xu SP. Influence of tetracycline resistance on the transport of manure-derived Escherichia coil in saturated porous media. Water Research. 2011;45(4):1681–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lutterodt G, Basnet M, Foppen JWA, Uhlenbrook S. The effect of surface characteristics on the transport of multiple Escherichia coli isolates in large scale columns of quartz sand. Water Research. 2009;43(3):595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim HN, Bradford SA, Walker SL. Escherichia coli O157:H7 Transport in Saturated Porous Media: Role of Solution Chemistry and Surface Macromolecules. Environmental Science & Technology. 2009;43(12):4340–4347. doi: 10.1021/es8026055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim HN, Hong Y, Lee I, Bradford SA, Walker SL. Surface Characteristics and Adhesion Behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7: Role of Extracellular Macromolecules. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(9):2556–2564. doi: 10.1021/bm900516y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haznedaroglu BZ, Zorlu O, Hill JE, Walker SL. Identifying the Role of Flagella in the Transport of Motile and Nonmotile Salmonella enterica Serovars. Environmental Science & Technology. 2010;44(11):4184–4190. doi: 10.1021/es100136m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chollet R, Chevalier J, Bryskier A, Pages JM. The AcrAB-TolC pump is involved in macrolide resistance but not in telithromycin efflux in Enterobacter aerogenes and Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(9):3621–3624. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3621-3624.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Cristobal RE, Vincent PA, Salomon RA. Multidrug resistance pump AcrAB-TolC is required for high-level, Tet(A)-mediated tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006;58(1):31–36. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fralick JA. Evidence that TolC is required for functioning of the Mar/AcrAB efflux pump of Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 1996;178(19):5803–5805. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.19.5803-5805.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nishino K, Yamada J, Hirakawa H, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. Roles of TolC-dependent multidrug transporters of Escherichia coli in resistance to beta-lactams. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003;47(9):3030–3033. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.3030-3033.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006 doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W. Gene Disruption in Escherichia-Coli - Tcr and Km(R) Cassettes with the Option of Flp-Catalyzed Excision of the Antibiotic-Resistance Determinant. Gene. 1995;158(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00193-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 2000; pp. 6640–6645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu SP, Liao Q, Saiers JE. Straining of nonspherical colloids in saturated porous media. Environmental Science & Technology. 2008;42(3):771–778. doi: 10.1021/es071328w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Weight WD. Hydrogeology field manual. 2nd. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Havelaar AH, Vanolphen M, Schijven JF. Removal and inactivation of viruses by drinking-water treatment processes under full-scale conditions. Water Science and Technology. 1995;31(5-6):55–62. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walker SL, Redman JA, Elimelech M. Influence of growth phase on bacterial deposition: Interaction mechanisms in packed-bed column and radial stagnation point flow systems. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39(17):6405–6411. doi: 10.1021/es050077t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kretzschmar R, Barmettler K, Grolimund D, Yan YD, Borkovec M, Sticher H. Experimental determination of colloid deposition rates and collision efficiencies in natural porous media. Water Resources Research. 1997;33(5):1129–1137. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Castro FD, Tufenkji N. Relevance of nontoxigenic strains as surrogates for Escherichia coli O157: H7 in groundwater contamination potential: Role of temperature and cell acclimation time. Environmental Science & Technology. 2007;41(12):4332–4338. doi: 10.1021/es0701558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Redman JA, Walker SL, Elimelech M. Bacterial adhesion and transport in porous media: Role of the secondary energy minimum. Environmental Science & Technology. 2004;38(6):1777–1785. doi: 10.1021/es034887l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ong YL, Razatos A, Georgiou G, Sharma MM. Adhesion forces between E-coli bacteria and biomaterial surfaces. Langmuir. 1999;15(8):2719–2725. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bayoudh S, Othmane A, Bettaieb F, Bakhrouf A, Ben Ouada H, Ponsonnet L. Quantification of the adhesion free energy between bacteria and hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrata. Materials Science & Engineering C-Biomimetic and Supramolecular Systems. 2006;26(2-3):300–305. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bayoudh S, Othmane A, Mora L, Ben Ouada H. Assessing bacterial adhesion using DLVO and XDLVO theories and the jet impingement technique. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces. 2009;73(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farahat M, Hirajima T, Sasaki K, Doi K. Adhesion of Escherichia coli onto quartz, hematite and corundum: Extended DLVO theory and flotation behavior. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces. 2009;74(1):140–149. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Elimelech M. Particle Deposition on Ideal Collectors from Dilute Flowing Suspensions - Mathematical Formulation, Numerical-Solution, and Simulations. Separations Technology. 1994;4(4):186–212. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang XF, Bhattacharjee S, Hoek EMV. Is Surface Roughness a “Scapegoat” or a Primary Factor When Defining Particle-Substrate Interactions? Langmuir. 2010;26(4):2528–2537. doi: 10.1021/la9028113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morrow JB, Stratton R, Yang HH, Smets BF, Grasso D. Macro- and nanoscale observations of adhesive behavior for several E-coli strains (O157: H7 and environmental isolates) on mineral surfaces. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39(17):6395–6404. doi: 10.1021/es0500815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haznedaroglu BZ, Bolster CH, Walker SL. The role of starvation on Escherichia coli adhesion and transport in saturated porous media. Water Research. 2008;42(6-7):1547–1554. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang L, Xu S, Li J. Effects of Phosphate on the Transport of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Saturated Quartz Sand. Environmental Science & Technology. 2011;45(22):9566–9573. doi: 10.1021/es201132s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Walker SL, Redman JA, Elimelech M. Role of cell surface lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion and transport. Langmuir. 2004;20(18):7736–7746. doi: 10.1021/la049511f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Porubcan AA, Xu SP. Colloid straining within saturated heterogeneous porous media. Water Research. 2011;45(4):1796–1806. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Oss CJ. Acid-Base Interfacial Interactions in Aqueous-Media. Colloids and Surfaces a-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1993;78:1–49. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Morrow JB, Stratton R, Yang HH, Smets BF, Grasso D. Macro- and nanoscale observations of adhesive behavior for several E-coli strains (O157:H7 and environmental isolates) on mineral surfaces. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39(17):6395–6404. doi: 10.1021/es0500815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hong Y, Brown DG. Cell surface acid-base properties of Escherichia coli and Bacillus brevis and variation as a function of growth phase, nitrogen source and C: N ratio. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces. 2006;50(2):112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koronakis V, Sharff A, Koronakis E, Luisi B, Hughes C. Crystal structure of the bacterial membrane protein TolC central to multidrug efflux and protein export. Nature. 2000;405(6789):914–919. doi: 10.1038/35016007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wright GD. Mechanisms of Aminoglycoside Antibiotic Resistance. In: Wax RG, Lewis K, Salyers AA, Taber H, editors. Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobials. 2nd. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 2008. pp. 71–101. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johanson JJ, Feriancikova L, Xu SP. Influence of Enterococcal Surface Protein (esp) on the Transport of Enterococcus faecium within Saturated Quartz Sands. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012;46(3):1511–1518. doi: 10.1021/es203265m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Azeredo J, Visser J, Oliveira R. Exopolymers in bacterial adhesion: interpretation in terms of DLVO and XDLVO theories. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces. 1999;14(1-4):141–148. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharma PK, Rao KH. Adhesion of Paenibacillus polymyxa on chalcopyrite and pyrite: surface thermodynamics and extended DLVO theory. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces. 2003;29(1):21–38. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Torkzaban S, Tazehkand SS, Walker SL, Bradford SA. Transport and fate of bacteria in porous media: Coupled effects of chemical conditions and pore space geometry. Water Resources Research. 2008;44(4):W04403. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dong HL. Significance of electrophoretic mobility distribution to bacterial transport in granular porous media. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2002;51(1):83–93. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhattacharjee S, Ko CH, Elimelech M. DLVO interaction between rough surfaces. Langmuir. 1998;14(12):3365–3375. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang P, Keller AA. Natural and Engineered Nano and Colloidal Transport: Role of Zeta Potential in Prediction of Particle Deposition. Langmuir. 2009;25(12):6856–6862. doi: 10.1021/la900134f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Strauss J, Burnham NA, Camesano TA. Atomic force microscopy study of the role of LPS O-antigen on adhesion of E. coli. Journal of Molecular Recognition. 2009;22(5):347–355. doi: 10.1002/jmr.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mellon M, Benbrook C, Benbrook KL. Hogging It!: Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock. 2001 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boczek LA, Rice EW, Johnston B, Johnson JR. Occurrence of antibiotic-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli clonal group A in wastewater effluents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(13):4180–4184. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02225-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Walczak JJ, Xu SP. Manure as a Source of Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococci: a Case Study of a Wisconsin, USA Family Dairy Farm. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 2011;219(1-4):579–589. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Salmore AK, Hollis EJ, McLellan SL. Delineation of a chemical and biological signature for storm water pollution in an urban river. J Wat Health. 2006;4(2):247–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sapkota AR, Curriero FC, Gibson KE, Schwab KJ. Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115(7):1040–1045. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Anderson ME, Sobsey MD. Detection and occurrence of antimicrobially resistant E-coli in groundwater on or near swine farms in eastern North Carolina. Water Science and Technology. 2006;54(3):211–218. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Institute of Medicine. The Resistance phenomenon in microbes and infectious disease vectors: implications for human health and strategies for containment. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/yale/Doc?id=10032357 Online book. [PubMed]
- 57.World Health Organization. 1st Joint FAO/OIE/WHO Expert Workshop on Non-human Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance: Scientific assessment. Geneva: Dec 1-3, 2003. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/en/amr.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Walsh C. Antibiotics: actions, origins, resistance. ASM Press; Washington, D.C.: 2003. p. 335. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Harter T, Davis H, Mathews MC, Meyer RD. Shallow groundwater quality on dairy farms with irrigated forage crops. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2002;55(3-4):287–315. doi: 10.1016/s0169-7722(01)00189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bolster CH, Cook KL, Marcus IM, Haznedaroglu BZ, Walker SL. Correlating Transport Behavior with Cell Properties for Eight Porcine Escherichia coli Isolates. Environmental Science & Technology. 2010;44(13):5008–5014. doi: 10.1021/es1010253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bolster CH, Haznedaroglu BZ, Walker SL. Diversity in Cell Properties and Transport Behavior among 12 Different Environmental Escherichia coli Isolates. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2009;38(2):465–472. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Foppen JW, Lutterodt G, Roling WFM, Uhlenbrook S. Towards understanding inter-strain attachment variations of Escherichia coli during transport in saturated quartz sand. Water Research. 2010;44(4):1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Abu-Lail NI, Camesano TA. Role of lipopolysaccharides in the adhesion, retention, and transport of Escherichia coli JM109. Environmental Science & Technology. 2003;37(10):2173–2183. doi: 10.1021/es026159o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.