Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Mol Med. 2005 Mar;15(3):443–448.

Polymorphisms for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and genetic susceptibility to COPD

Jong Y Park 1, Lan Chen 1, Nina Wadhwa 1, Melvyn S Tockman 1,2
PMCID: PMC3705731  NIHMSID: NIHMS451668  PMID: 15702235

Abstract

Although smoking is the major causal factor in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), only 10–20% of chronic heavy cigarette smokers develop symptomatic COPD, which suggests the presence of genetic susceptibility. The human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EH) is a metabolizing enzyme which involves the process of numerous reactive epoxide intermediates and contains polymorphic alleles which are associated with altered EH activity and may be linked to increased risk for COPD. To determine whether the EH polymorphisms contributed to increased risk for COPD, prevalence of the EH codons 113 and 139 polymorphisms were compared between COPD patients and controls using a PCR-RFLP analysis using genomic DNA isolated from 131 COPD patients and 262 individually matched controls by age (± 5 years) among Caucasians with 1:2 ratio. Significantly increased risk for COPD was observed for subjects with the EH113His/His genotypes (OR =2.4, 95% CI=1.1–5.1). These results were consistent with the fact that a significant trend towards increased risk was observed with predicted less protective EH codon 113 genotypes (p = 0.03, trend test). A similar association was not observed for EH codon139 polymorphism. As expected, a significant correlation between smoking dose and severity of COPD was observed (p<0.001). These results suggest that EH codon 113 polymorphism may modify risk for COPD.

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epoxide hydrolase, genetic polymorphism, genetic susceptibility

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major health problem with increasing prevalence and mortality. While cigarette smoking is the main risk factor for the development of COPD, only 10–20% of chronic heavy cigarette smokers develop symptomatic COPD which indicates the presence of genetic predisposing factors in its pathogenesis (1). Despite the clinical importance of COPD and its predisposed condition of lung cancer (2), the genetic susceptibility of this lung disease has not been not fully investigated. The genes which have been implicated in the development of COPD are involved in protease imbalance, metabolism of tobacco toxic materials and the inflammatory process (3).

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EH) is one of enzymes involved that metabolize environmental reactive epoxide intermediates. This process is controversial because it produces not only the dihydrodiol derivatives which substrates for additional metabolism to highly reactive and carcinogenic compounds from tobacco toxic materials, such as benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), but also less toxic water-soluble transhydrodiol derivatives. Hence, although EH metabolizes tobacco carcinogens such as polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) into highly mutagenic diol epoxides (4, 5), EH is considered a protective enzyme involved in defense from oxidative damage against a number of environmental substances (68).

Among 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding region of the EH gene reported (9), functional analysis performed on two non-synonymous polymorphisms at codons 113 (Tyr>His) and 139 (His>Arg), and both have been associated with alterations in EH activity (10). The EH113His variant is associated with a 40% decrease in EH activity while the EH139Arg variant enhances enzyme activity by 25% via an increase in EH protein stability (10). These polymorphic alleles have previously been linked to risk changes for various smoking related cancers (11, 12), including lung cancer (9, 13, 14).

Results from previous epidemiological studies that investigated an association between EH polymorphisms and risk for COPD are inconsistent. Significant associations between low EH activity genotypes and COPD risk were reported in several studies,(6, 1518) but these findings were not observed in other studies (1922). Together with the finding that EH is expressed in lung tissues (23), these data suggest that EH polymorphisms may play important roles in risk for lung diseases.

In this present study, data are presented investigating the effects of EH genotypes on COPD risk examined both alone and in combination with two polymorphisms in EH gene.

Materials and methods

Study Populations and Sample Processing

One hundred thirty one COPD patients, and 262 individually matched with 1:2 ratio by age (± 5 years) among Caucasians were recruited from a cancer-screening clinic affiliated with the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (Tampa, FL). At this center, which screens approximately 23,000 subjects annually, routine screenings are performed for cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, colorectum, cervix and skin. The eligible subjects were healthy non-cancer subjects. Ineligible were those with a history of any cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer. All participants agreed to undergo spirometry, with measurement of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). The initial eligibility for COPD included a degree of pulmonary obstruction based upon ratio of FEV1/FVC. Study population was divided into two groups, one consisting of controls (≥70%) and the other of COPD patients (<70%).

Protocols involving the analysis of blood specimens were approved by the institutional review boards at the participating institutes, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Detailed questionnaire data have been collected from all subjects through one-on-one patient interviews. A questionnaire was administered to all subjects that contained questions on demographics, and life-long smoking habits. Tobacco use was categorized into pack-years (py) for smokers of cigarettes (1pack/day for 1year = 1py). Blood samples were collected from all subjects for genotyping assays. DNA was isolated from blood by incubation overnight with proteinase K (0.1 mg/ml) in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 50°C, extracted with phenol:chloroform, and ethanol precipitation as previously described (24).

Genotyping Assays

All subjects were screened for the presence of the EH codons at 113 and 139 polymorphisms by a modified PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis similar to that described previously using primers homologous to exon 3 of the EH gene to generate a 172bp fragment and AspI restriction enzyme treatment for codon 113 polymorphism and using primers homologous to exon 4 and intron 4 sequences in the EH gene utilized to generate a 286bp fragment and RsaI restriction enzyme for codon 139 polymorphism (12).

Statistical Analysis

The risks of COPD in relation to EH genotypes were estimated using the chi-square test and conditional logistic regression to calculate ORs and 95%CIs. Conditional logistic regression models were fit to examine the relationship between the log odds of COPD and each covariate in the whole population and also in different subgroups after with/without adjusting for the following factors: age, smoking, and sex. Subjects were categorized into three groups based on the predicted activity of their EH genotype as described previously:(10) the slow EH activity genotype (113His/His139His/His, and 113His/His139His/Arg), normal EH activity genotypes (113His/Tyr139His/His, 113Tyr/Tyr139His/His, and 113His/Tyr139His/Arg) and fast EH activity genotype (113Tyr/Tyr139His/Arg, 113Tyr/Tyr139Arg/Arg, and 113His/Tyr139Arg/Arg). The χ2 analysis was used to test for allelic prevalence, gender distribution and for a deviation of genotype distribution from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The χ2 test for trend was used to examine potential associations between predicted high-risk EH genotypes and COPD risk. The Student's t-test (2-tailed) was used for comparing the smoking (py), age, and FEV1/FVC ratio variables between COPD patients and controls. The Pearson’s test was used to examine correlation between smoking level and severity of COPD. The statistical computer software SAS (version 8e; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

A total of 393 Caucasians with/without COPD were entered into this study. The mean ages of control and COPD groups were 61 and 64, and approximately 25% of COPD and 35% of controls were females (Table 1). As expected, COPD groups had a significantly higher level of cigarette consumption than control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, level of smoking consumption significantly correlates with severity of COPD (p <0.001) (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of subjects according to demographic characteristics.

Control COPD P value
N 262 131
Mean age (yr) 61 64 0.001
<50yrs 14 (5)1 4 (3)
50–59 102 (39) 28 (21)
60–69 106 (40) 64 (49)
70yrs≤ 40 (16) 35 (27)
Gender (M/F) 169/93 98/33 0.04
Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio ± SD 0.77 ± 0.04 0.56 ± 0.11 <0.001
Mean smoking (py) ± SD 49.7 ± 28.2 64.1 ± 26.3 <0.001
1

Numbers in parenthesis denote percentages.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation between smoking level and severity of COPD

The genotyping was determined by the combined data obtained from individual PCR-RFLP analysis of the codons 113 and 139 polymorphisms. In controls, the allelic frequencies of both EH113His and EH139Arg variant were 0.24. These allelic frequencies are similar to those observed in previous studies of Caucasians (7, 13, 17, 18), but significantly different from the Asian population (15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 25).

A significant difference in EH113His allelic frequency was observed between control and COPD groups. A frequency of the EH113His allele was 0.32 in COPD group and 0.24 in controls (0.24) (p=0.02), while the EH139Arg allelic frequency was similar in both groups (COPD: 0.20 vs. controls: 0.24; p=0.2). The prevalence of these polymorphisms among controls followed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p=0.89 for EH codon 113 polymorphism, p=0.95 for EH codon 139 polymorphism).

To determine whether the EH polymorphisms contributed to increased risk for COPD, we examined the prevalence of EH polymorphic alleles in COPD patients versus control subjects. Significantly increased risk for COPD was observed for subjects with the EH113His/His genotype (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.2–5.2) (Table 2). This risk was not affected by adjusting for other potential confounding factors (age, sex, and smoking level) via regression analysis (ORadjusted =2.4, 95% CI=1.1–5.1). These results were consistent with the fact that a significant trend towards increased risk was observed with predicted less protective EH codon 113 genotypes (p = 0.03, trend test, Table 2). A similar association was not observed for EH codon 139 polymorphism. Using the presumed fast EH activity genotypes as the reference group, a near significant increased risk was observed with slow, presumed less protective, EH genotypes (OR= 2.2, 95%CI=0.9–5.2, p=0.07, Table 2).

Table 2.

EH polymorphic variants and COPD risk stratified by smoking level.

EH genotypes Control COPD OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI)1

113Tyr/Tyr 153 (58)2 67 (51) 1.0 (referent) 3 1.0 (referent)
Total 113Tyr/His 92 (35) 45 (34) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 1.2 (0.7–1.9)
113His/His 17 (7) 19 (15) 2.6 (1.2–5.2) 2.4 (1.1–5.1)
139His/His 153 (58) 82 (63) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Total 139Arg/His 93 (36) 44 (34) 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 1.3 (0.8–2.1)
139Arg/Arg 16 (6) 4 (3) 0.8 (0.2–2.5) 0.8 (0.2–2.8)

113Tyr/Tyr 85 (56) 20 (51) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Smoker <47py 113Tyr/His 60 (39) 11 (28) 0.8 (0.3–1.7) 0.8 (0.4–1.9)
113His/His 7 (5) 8 (21) 4.9 (1.6–15.0) 4.6 (1.3–15.5)
113Tyr/Tyr 68 (56) 47 (51) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Smoker 47py≤ 113Tyr/His 32 (39) 34 (28) 1.5 (0.8–2.8) 1.5 (0.8–2.9)
113His/His 10 (5) 11 (21) 1.6 (0.6–4.0) 1.2 (0.5–3.2)
139His/His 104 (58) 21 (63) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Smoker <47py 139Arg/His 41 (36) 15 (34) 1.8 (0.9–3.9) 1.9 (0.9–4.4)
139Arg/Arg 6 (6) 2 (3) 1.7 (0.3–8.7) 1.8 (0.3–10.3)
139His/His 73 (58) 61 (63) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Smoker 47py≤ 139Arg/His 31 (36) 29 (34) 1.1 (0.6–2.1) 1.1 (0.6–2.1)
139Arg/Arg 5 (6) 2 (3) 0.5 (0.1–2.6) 0.6 (0.1–3.5)

Predicted EH activity4 Control COPD OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI)

Fast 51 (20) 24 (18) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Total Normal 191 (74) 87 (67) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 1.0 (0.5–1.7)
Slow 17 (6) 19 (15) 2.4 (1.1–5.4) 2.2 (0.9–5.2)
1

ORs were calculated by adjusting for sex, age, and smoking (py).

2

Numbers in parenthesis denote percentages.

3

Significant increase in predicted high-risk genotypes as determined by χ2-trend test (p=0.03).

4

The slow EH activity genotype (113His/His139His/His, and 113His/His139His/Arg), normal EH activity genotypes (113His/Tyr139His/His, 113Tyr/Tyr139His/His, and 113His/Tyr139His/Arg) and fast EH activity genotype (113Tyr/Tyr139His/Arg, 113Tyr/Tyr139Arg/Arg, and 113His/Tyr139Arg/Arg).

To examine the association between EH genotypes and COPD risk by exposure to the environmental risk factor, smoking, we stratified study subjects by EH genotypes and different smoking levels. The differences in risk associated with the EH genotypes were modified by smoking history (Table 2). The association between EH genotypes and COPD was examined based upon smoking level. Smokers were stratified into two groups based upon lifetime smoking history divided at the median number of pack-years for subjects (47 py; Table 2). The EH113His/His genotype was associated with an increased risk for COPD in smokers with a history of <47 py (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.3 – 15.5; Table 2). A significant association was also observed in the low-dose group when stratifying tobacco use at the median number of pack-years for controls in our data set (47 py). No association between EH codon 113 genotypes and COPD risk was observed in subjects with a greater dose of lifetime smoking (i.e., ≥47 py, OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.5 – 3.2; Table 2). No association between EH 139 polymorphism genotypes and COPD risk was observed after stratifying by smoking.

DISCUSSION

Epoxide hydrolase is an enzyme that functions to catalyze the addition of water to an epoxide to form the vicinal dihydrodiol. EH is known to play a central role in the formation of precursors of even more deleterious products in the metabolisms for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon to diol bay region epoxides (8). However, enzymatic hydration often results in metabolites of lower reactivity or metabolites which can be conjugated and excreted. Therefore, in most cases, the action of EH is considered as detoxifying process.

Similar to that observed in previous reports of association between smoking and COPD risk (26, 27), we observed a significant correlation between smoking dose and severity of COPD. This correlation is dose-dependent, with significantly increased severity of COPD with smoking levels (Table 1).

Our data suggested an association between EH codon 113 polymorphism and risk for smoking related COPD. These results are biologically plausible and consistent with a critical role for EH in the metabolism of tobacco oxidative damage and in tobacco-related lung diseases. We observed a stronger association between EH113His/His genotype and COPD among light smokers (<47pys). This pattern is similar to that observed in previous studies examining polymorphic genotypes and lung cancer risk. The glutathione S transferase M1 (GSTM1) (0/0) (28, 29), the CYP1A1 exon 7 and Mspl polymorphisms (29, 30), and CYP2D6 polymorphisms (31) have all been shown to be associated with increased risk for lung cancer in light but not heavy smokers. Therefore, genetic variations in the ability to metabolize tobacco smoke toxins are most important in determining risk for lung disease at low levels of exposure, and may be less relevant at higher smoking doses where high levels of tobacco toxin exposure overwhelm polymorphism-induced differences in enzyme activity and/or expression.

Up to date, there are nine independent epidemiological studies investigated association between EH polymorphisms and COPD risk using Asians and Caucasians (Table 3). The results of studies are not consistent, and allele frequencies were significantly different among studies. These discrepancies may be differences of race, population selection, and grouping of genotypes. Among six Asian studies, one Chinese study (16) and one Taiwanese study (15) found that slow EH activity genotypes were a risk factor for COPD. However, two Japanese studies (19, 22), a Chinese study (32), and a Korean study (25) did not find a significant association between EH genotypes and COPD risk, whereas the EH polymorphism may be related with COPD severity (15, 17, 22). In two Caucasian studies, performed in the United Kingdom (6), and Spain (18), reported a significant higher risk among COPD patients with slow EH genotypes. Finally, Sanford et al. have reported the significant association of the homozygous EH113His–139His (very slow) EH genotype with rapid decline in lung function (17) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Epidemiological studies for the association between epoxide hydrolase polymorphism and COPD risk

First author, year Ethnicity Allelic frequencies Number of Level of
association
reference
113His 139Arg COPD Control
Cheng et al. 2004 Taiwanese 0.48 0.19 184 212 2.3 (1.1–4.3)1 (15)
Xiao et al. 2003 Chinese 0.55 0.09 100 100 3.0 (1.2–7.1)2
0.9 (0.4–2.0) 3
(16)
Budhi et al. 2003 Japanese 0.42 0.17 63 172 1.4 (0.7–2.7)4
0.7 (0.4–1.3)5
(19)
Rodriquez et al. 2003 Caucasian (Spain) 0.21 0.19 79 146 7.0 (1.4–34.6)6 (18)
Zhang et al. 2002 Chinese 0.58 0.19 55 52 1.3 (0.6–2.9)7
1.2 (0.3–4.7)8
(32)
Yim et al., 2000 Korean 0.53 0.14 83 76 0.7 (0.3–1.5)9 (25)
Sandford et al 2001 Caucasian (US) 0.28 0.21 283 308 2.4 (1.1–5.4)10 (17)
Yokikawa et al 2000 Japanese 0.44 0.14 40 140 0.9 (0.4–1.9)7
1.3 (0.5–3.0) 5
(22)
Smith et al., 1997 Caucasian (UK) 0.31 0.15 68 203 3.5 (1.5–8.0)11
2.0 (0.3–2.4) 8
(6)
1

Comparison between the slow/very slow vs normal/fast.

2

Comparison between the EH113Tyr/Tyr vs EH113Tyr/His

3

Comparison between the EH139His/Arg vs EH139His/His.

4

Comparison between the EH113Tyr/Tyr + EH113Tyr/His vs EH113His/His

5

Comparison between the EH139His/His vs EH139His/Arg + EH139Arg/Arg

6

Comparison between the very slow vs slow/normal/fast.

7

Comparison between the EH113Tyr/Tyr vs EH113Tyr/His + EH113His/His

8

Comparison between the EH139His/His + EH139His/Arg vs EH139Arg/Arg

9

Comparison between the slow vs others.

10

Individuals with homozygous EH113His-139His haplotype among fast decliners.

11

Comparison between the EH113Tyr/Tyr vs EH113His/His

The COPD is a lung disease that likely involves multiple genes in development and progression. We previously reported a gene:gene interaction between the polymorphisms in the GSTs and EH in smoking related-oral cancer (33). Polymorphisms of non-penetrance genes often contribute a low or moderate relative risk change. Therefore it will be necessary to study other genes involved in tobacco toxin metabolic pathways, such as GSTs, and P450CYPs. Strength of our study is the use of controls individually matched by age (±5 years) and race to remove potential confounding effects. A limitation of this study is the potential selection bias of gender because controls were not matched by sex. However, there was no significant difference of genotype distribution between genders, and EH gene is located on chromosome 1q42.1 not X or Y. Therefore, it is not likely affect the results of this study. In summary, codon 113 polymorphism in the EH gene appear to play a role in susceptibility to COPD.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Joseph Burton for his participation in the collection of clinical samples and questionnaire data, Dr. Jun Zhou for providing clinical samples and demographic information. These studies were supported by NIH Grants: CA91314 (JP), CA084973 supplement (JP), CA084973 (MT).

References

  • 1.Bascom R. Differential susceptibility to tobacco smoke: possible mechanisms. Pharmacogenetics. 1991;1(2):102–106. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199111000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tockman MS, Anthonisen NR, Wright EC, Donithan MG. Airways obstruction and the risk for lung cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(4):512–518. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun Z, Yang P. Role of imbalance between neutrophil elastase and alpha 1-antitrypsin in cancer development and progression. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5(3):182–190. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01414-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gelboin HV. Benzo[alpha]pyrene metabolism, activation and carcinogenesis: role and regulation of mixed-function oxidases and related enzymes. Physiol Rev. 1980;60(4):1107–1166. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.4.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pastorelli R, Guanci M, Cerri A, et al. Impact of inherited polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase M1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, cytochrome P450 enzymes on DNA, and blood protein adducts of benzo(a)pyrene-diolepoxide. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7(8):703–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith CA, Harrison DJ. Association between polymorphism in gene for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and susceptibility to emphysema. Lancet. 1997;350(9078):630–633. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harrison DJ, Hubbard AL, MacMillan J, Wyllie AH, Smith CA. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene polymorphism and susceptibility to colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(1):168–171. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oesch F. Mammalian epoxide hydrases: inducible enzymes catalysing the inactivation of carcinogenic and cytotoxic metabolites derived from aromatic and olefinic compounds. Xenobiotica. 1973;3(5):305–340. doi: 10.3109/00498257309151525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park J, Chen L, Elahi A, Lazarus P, Tockman M. Genetic analysis of microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene and its association with lung cancer risk. European Journal of Cancer and Prevention. 2004 doi: 10.1097/00008469-200506000-00005. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hassett C, Aicher L, Sidhu JS, Omiecinski CJ. Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase: genetic polymorphism and functional expression in vitro of amino acid variants. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3(3):421–428. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.3.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jourenkova-Mironova N, Mitrunen K, Bouchardy C, Dayer P, Benhamou S, Hirvonen A. High-activity microsomal epoxide hydrolase genotypes and the risk of oral, pharynx, and larynx cancers. Cancer Res. 2000;60(3):534–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park JY, Schantz SP, Lazarus P. Epoxide hydrolase genotype and orolaryngeal cancer risk: interaction with GSTM1 genotype. Oral Oncol. 2003;39(5):483–490. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(03)00008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benhamou S, Reinikainen M, Bouchardy C, Dayer P, Hirvonen A. Association between lung cancer and microsomal epoxide hydrolase genotypes. Cancer Res. 1998;58(23):5291–5293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gsur A, Zidek T, Schnattinger K, et al. Association of microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(4):702–706. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng SL, Yu CJ, Chen CJ, Yang PC. Genetic polymorphism of epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004;23(6):818–824. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00104904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiao D, Wang C, Du MJ, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) gene and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003;83(20):1782–1786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sandford AJ, Chagani T, Weir TD, Connett JE, Anthonisen NR, Pare PD. Susceptibility genes for rapid decline of lung function in the lung health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(2):469–473. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2006158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rodriguez F, Jardi R, Costa X, et al. Detection of polymorphisms at exons 3 (Tyr113-->His) and 4 (His139-->Arg) of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene using fluorescence PCR method combined with melting curves analysis. Anal Biochem. 2002;308(1):120–126. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Budhi A, Hiyama K, Isobe T, et al. Genetic susceptibility for emphysematous changes of the lung in Japanese. Int J Mol Med. 2003;11(3):321–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yin L, Pu Y, Liu TY, Tung YH, Chen KW, Lin P. Genetic polymorphisms of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase, CYP1A1 and microsomal epoxide hydrolase and lung cancer risk in Nanjing, China. Lung Cancer. 2001;33(2–):133–141. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(01)00182-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang R, Zhang A, He Q, Lu B. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene polymorphism and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Han nationality of North China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2002;41(1):11–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yoshikawa M, Hiyama K, Ishioka S, Maeda H, Maeda A, Yamakido M. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase genotypes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japanese. Int J Mol Med. 2000;5(1):49–53. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.5.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Omiecinski CJ, Aicher L, Holubkov R, Checkoway H. Human peripheral lymphocytes as indicators of microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity in liver and lung. Pharmacogenetics. 1993;3(3):150–158. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199306000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park JY, Muscat JE, Ren Q, et al. CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and oral cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(10):791–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yim JJ, Park GY, Lee CT, et al. Genetic susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Koreans: combined analysis of polymorphic genotypes for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1. Thorax. 2000;55(2):121–125. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.2.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molfino NA. Genetics of COPD. Chest. 2004;125(5):1929–1940. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.5.1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Collie CE. The health hazards of smoking. West Indian Med J. 2004;53(1):1–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.London SJ, Daly AK, Cooper J, Navidi WC, Carpenter CL, Idle JR. Polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase M1 and lung cancer risk among African-Americans and Caucasians in Los Angeles County, California. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(16):1246–1253. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.16.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nakachi K, Imai K, Hayashi S, Kawajiri K. Polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 and glutathione S-transferase genes associated with susceptibility to lung cancer in relation to cigarette dose in a Japanese population. Cancer Res. 1993;53(13):2994–2999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ishibe N, Wiencke JK, Zuo ZF, McMillan A, Spitz M, Kelsey KT. Susceptibility to lung cancer in light smokers associated with CYP1A1 polymorphisms in Mexican- and African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(12):1075–1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.London SJ, Daly AK, Leathart JB, Navidi WC, Carpenter CC, Idle JR. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6 and lung cancer risk in African-Americans and Caucasians in Los Angeles County. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(6):1203–1214. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.6.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang R, Zhang A, He Q, Lu B. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene polymorphism and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Han nationality of North China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2002;41(1):11–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park JY, Muscat JE, Kaur T, et al. Comparison of GSTM polymorphisms and risk for oral cancer between African-Americans and Caucasians. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10(2):123–131. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200003000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES