Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1981 Feb;67(2):486–492. doi: 10.1172/JCI110057

The chronically instrumental ewe: a model for studying vascular reactivity to angiotensin II in pregnancy.

C R Rosenfeld, N F Gant Jr
PMCID: PMC370590  PMID: 7462427

Abstract

Vascular refractoriness to the systemic pressor effects of angiotension II (AII) develops normally during human pregnancy. To ascertain if the ewe might provide a suitable animal model to study the mechanisms responsible for this response (unique to pregnancy) we studied this phenomenon in unanesthetized, chronically instrumented nonpregnant and pregnant sheep, 68-143 d gestation. In these studies dose-response curves were established for changes in both mean arterial pressure and uterine blood flow. The pressor response to continuous infusions of AII increases as a function of the dose of AII in both nonpregnant and pregnant animals (P less than 0.001), R = 0.943 and 0.879, respectively. However, the pregnant animals were refractory to the pressor effects of AII, requiring 0.016 microgram of AII/min per kg to elicit a 20 mm HG rise in mean arterial pressure, in contrast to 0.009 for nonpregnant animals. The slope and intercept for the regression lines are different at P less than 0.001. In pregnant animals the dose-response curve for uterine blood flow was also determined. Increases in uterine blood flow were observed at doses of AII less than 0.016 microgram/min per kg, while larger doses resulted in a progressively greater reduction in blood flow. It appears likely that the ewe may serve as an animal model suitable for the further study of the unique pregnancy-modified systemic and uteroplacental vascular responses elicited by AII.

Full text

PDF
486

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABDUL-KARIM R., ASSALIN S. Pressor response to angiotonin in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Aug;82:246–251. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(61)90053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ASSALI N. S., WESTERSTEN A. Regional flow-pressure relationship in response to angiotensin in the intact dog and sheep. Circ Res. 1961 Jan;9:189–193. doi: 10.1161/01.res.9.1.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berssenbrugge A. D., Goodfriend T. L., Ball D. L., Rankin J. H. The effect of pregnancy on the angiotensin II pressor response in the rabbit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Mar 15;136(6):762–767. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90453-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHESLEY L. C., TALLEDO E., BOHLER C. S., ZUSPAN F. P. VASCULAR REACTIVITY TO ANGIOTENSIN II AND NOREPINEPHRINE IN PREGNANT WOMEN. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965 Mar 15;91:837–842. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(65)90462-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen D. M., Steinberger S. J., Swan J. F., Disalvo J. Angiotensin II increases uterine vascular resistance in pregnant and nonpregnant rabbits. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1977 Apr;154(4):597–601. doi: 10.3181/00379727-154-39726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Everett R. B., Worley R. J., MacDonald P. C., Gant N. F. Effect of prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors on pressor response to angiotensin II in human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978 Jun;46(6):1007–1010. doi: 10.1210/jcem-46-6-1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Everett R. B., Worley R. J., MacDonald P. C., Gant N. F. Modification of vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II in pregnant women by intravenously infused 5alpha-dihydroprogesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jun 15;131(4):352–357. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90407-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferris T. F., Stein J. H., Kauffman J. Uterine blood flow and uterine renin secretion. J Clin Invest. 1972 Nov;51(11):2827–2833. doi: 10.1172/JCI107105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GREISS F. C., Jr, VAN WILKES EFFECTS OF SYMPATHOMIMETIC DRUGS AND ANGIOTENSIN ON THE UTERINE VASCULAR BED. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Jun;23:925–930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gant N. F., Chand S., Whalley P. J., MacDonald P. C. The nature of pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in human pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Jun;43(6):854–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gant N. F., Daley G. L., Chand S., Whalley P. J., MacDonald P. C. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 1973 Nov;52(11):2682–2689. doi: 10.1172/JCI107462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Killam A. P., Rosenfeld C. R., Battaglia F. C., Makowski E. L., Meschia G. Effect of estrogens on the uterine blood flow of oophorectomized ewes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Apr 15;115(8):1045–1052. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90552-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenfeld C. R., Barton M. D., Meschia G. Effects of epinephrine on distribution of blood flow in the pregnant ewe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jan 15;124(2):156–163. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenfeld C. R. Distribution of cardiac output in ovine pregnancy. Am J Physiol. 1977 Mar;232(3):H231–H235. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1977.232.3.H231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenfeld C. R., Killam A. P., Battaglia F. C., Makowski E. L., Meschia G. Effect of estradiol-17, on the magnitude and distribution of uterine blood flow in nonpregnant, oophorectomized ewes. Pediatr Res. 1973 Mar;7(3):139–148. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenfeld C. R., Morriss F. H., Jr, Battaglia F. C., Makowski E. L., Meschia G. Effect of estradiol-17beta on blood flow to reproductive and nonreproductive tissues in pregnant ewes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Mar 15;124(6):618–629. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosenfeld C. R., Morriss F. H., Jr, Makowski E. L., Meschia G., Battaglia F. C. Circulatory changes in the reproductive tissues of ewes during pregnancy. Gynecol Invest. 1974;5(5-6):252–268. doi: 10.1159/000301658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenfeld C. R., West J. Circulatory response to systemic infusion of norepinephrine in the pregnant ewe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Feb 15;127(4):376–383. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90493-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwarz R., Retzke U. Cardiovascular response to infusions of angiotensin II in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Nov;38(5):714–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Speroff L., Haning R. V., Jr, Levin R. M. The effect of angiotensin II and indomethacin on uterine artery blood flow in pregnant monkeys. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Nov;50(5):611–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Talledo O. E. Renin-angiotensin system in normal and toxemic pregnancies. I. Angiotensin infusion test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966 Sep 1;96(1):141–143. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34655-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Terragno N. A., Terragno A., McGiff J. C. Prostaglandin E - angiotensin II interactions in the gravid uterus. Acta Physiol Lat Am. 1974;24(5):550–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES