Skip to main content
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal logoLink to Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
. 2013 May 9;13(2):E346–E349. doi: 10.12816/0003251

Maxillary First Molar with Two Root Canals

Saeed Rahimi 1, Negin Ghasemi 1,*
PMCID: PMC3706135  PMID: 23862051

Abstract

Knowledge regarding the anatomic morphology of maxillary molars is absolutely essential for the success of endodontic treatment. The morphology of the permanent maxillary first molar has been reviewed extensively; however, the presence of two canals in a two-rooted maxillary first molar has rarely been reported in studies describing tooth and root canal anatomies. This case report presents a patient with a maxillary first molar with two roots and two root canals, who was referred to the Department of Endodontics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Keywords: Dental Pulp Cavity, abnormalities; Maxillary Bone; Root Canal Therapy; Case report; Iran


Thorough cleaning, shaping and the obturation of the entire root canal system are essential steps for successful endodontic treatment. Consequently, a thorough knowledge of root canal morphology and a good anticipation of their possible morphologic variation will help to reduce endodontic failure. Unusual root and root canal morphologies associated with molars have been recorded in several studies in the literature.1,2 Maxillary first molars have the most complex root and canal morphology in the maxillary dentition; therefore, their anatomy has been studied extensively and there is a wide range of variation in the literature with respect to the number of roots and the number of canals in each root.213 It is now generally accepted that the most common form of maxillary first molar has three roots and four canals.4 The wide buccolingual dimension of the mesiobuccal root, and the associated concavities on its mesial and distal surfaces, are consistent with the majority of mesiobuccal roots having two canals, whereas there is usually a single canal in each of the distobuccal and palatal roots.5,6 The incidence of two mesiobuccal canals has been reported to range from 18–96.1%.3,4 Other variations include one, four, and five canals, and an unusual morphology of root canal systems within the individual roots.4,6,11 Cases with five and six root canals, or with a C-shaped canal configuration,78 have also been reported. Martínez-Berna and Ruiz-Badanelli reported 3 cases in which the maxillary first molars had six root canals (three in the mesiobuccal, two in the distobuccal, and one in the palatine roots).9 Palatal root canal variations were well-established by some case reports.5,10 However, the presence of two canals in a two-rooted maxillary first molar has rarely been reported in studies describing tooth and root canal anatomy.10 Such an anatomic variation has been reported in a limited number of previous studies in relation to the second maxillary molar; however, the present report documents the case in relation to the first maxillary molar, which is much less common.10,11

Case report

A 35-year-old female patient with no history of systemic disease was referred to the Department of Endodontics of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Iran. The patient’s chief complaint was of severe spontaneous pain in the right maxillary first molar. After obtaining informed consent from the patient, pulpal and periapical tests were done. The vitality tests performed showed a severe response to cold and heat, and the electrical pulpal test similarly showed a severe response. The response of the tooth to percussion and pulpation was within normal limits. The initial radiographic evaluation showed the presence of occlusal amalgam fillings and recurrent caries on the mesial surface, as well as a two-rooted maxillary first molar [Figure 1]. It should be noted that the left maxillary first molar had the same root canal anatomy [Figure 2]. The pre-treatment diagnosis for the pulpal condition was of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, and for a periapaical condition within normal limits. Local anaesthesia was administered with 2% lidocaine and 1:80000 adrenaline, and a rubber dam was placed. After the removal of the caries, the roof of the pulp chamber was removed completely and rinsed with a normal saline solution. One orifice was found in the buccal aspect; it had a large diameter compared to the typical buccal orifices in maxillary first molars. Subsequently, the other orifice was found in the palatal aspect [Figure 3]. No other orifice was found, even by exploration at x 4.5 magnification using a prismatic loupe (Zeiss Eyemag Pro S®. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Arese, Italy) and under the dental operating microscope (Seiler Revelation®, Seiler Instruments, St Louis, Missouri, USA). This morphology was confirmed by radiographic examination of the molar with K-Files #30 (DENTSPLY Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in both canals [Figure 4]. The root canals were explored with a K-Flexofile ISO 20 (DENTSPLY Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The lengths of the canals were determined by a Root-ZX II apex locator (Morita, Tokyo, Japan) and were confirmed with a periapical radiograph. The canals were then further prepared with Race rotary files (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) with 0.04 and 0.06 tapers up to 1 mm short of the radiographic apex to #35 with a 0.06 taper using the crown-down technique. During root canal preparation, irrigation was performed using a normal saline solution, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The canals were dried with absorbent paper points (DENTSPLY Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and obturated using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha points (DENTSPLY Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and AH26® resin sealer (DENTSPLY Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Postoperative radiography was used to evaluate the obturation quality [Figure 5]. The access cavity was then sealed with a temporary restorative material. The patient was referred to the Department of Operative Dentistry for restorative treatment.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

The initial radiograph showing the two-rooted maxillary first molar.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

The left maxillary first molar with the same root canal anatomy.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Two orifices in the floor of the pulp chamber, in the palatal aspect.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Radiographic examination with files revealed two root canals.

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Obturated root canals.

Discussion

The root and root canal morphology of teeth varies greatly in the reported literature. Prior knowledge of root and canal anatomy facilitates the precise detection of all root canals in a tooth during endodontic treatment. It has been shown that the total number of canals found and endodontically treated does not correspond to the number of canals actually existing in a tooth. The detection of root canals becomes difficult as a result of various factors.4,7,10 It is therefore important that we understand the variables that have a direct influence on the detection and treatment of root canals. Many studies have evaluated the root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar, because this tooth presents a complex morphology that often renders treatment difficult.3,4,6 The presence of additional root canals has been reported and discussed by several authors using a variety of study methods, including radiography, magnification, clinical evaluation, dye injection, tooth sectioning, and scanning electron microscopy. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans have attracted a lot of notice in the field of dentistry as a diagnostic and treatment-planning tool. Thus far, the chief use of CBCT has been in planning the placement of dental implants,13 but many other possibilities exist and are being explored. The different applications of CBCT in endodontics include the assessment of non-endodontic or endodontic pathosis, internal and external resorption analysis, pre-surgical planning and canal morphology.14,15

The fusion of two buccal roots is one of the most common aberrations of maxillary molars. A total of 0.4% of first maxillary molars and 2.2% of second maxillary molars have been reported to have this anomaly.4

Root canal morphology should be examined further during treatment through the evaluation of radiographs taken from different horizontal angles. The use of a preoperative radiograph and additional radiographic views from a 20º mesial or distal aspect are good techniques to detect root canal morphology and anatomy.3,4

Conclusion

Adequate knowledge of the morphology of the root canal system and its variations is essential for optimal endodontic treatment. The use of high-quality radiographs, with careful examination under magnification, is helpful so as to perform successful root canal therapy.

References

  • 1.Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34:1291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pasternak B, Júnior, Teixeira CS, Silva RG, Vansan LP, Sousa Neto MD. Treatment of a second maxillary molar with six canals. Aust Endod J. 2007;33:42–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malagnino V, Gallottini L, Passariello P. Some unusual clinical cases on root anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod. 1997;23:127–8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80260-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with a single root and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: a case report. J Endod. 2006;32:687–91. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM. Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod. 1991;17:80–4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81613-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod. 2004;30:668–71. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000121618.45515.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Almeida-Gomes F, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Carvalho de Sousa B, Alves dos Santos R. Six root canals in maxillary first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:157–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dankner E, Friedman S, Stabholz A. Bilateral C shape configuration in maxillary first molars. J Endod. 1990;16:601–3. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martínez-Berna A, Ruiz-Badanelli P. Maxillary first molars with six canals. J Endod. 1983;9:375–81. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holderrieth S, Gernhardt CR. Maxillary molars with morphologic variations of the palatal root canals: a report of four cases. J Endod. 2009;35:1060–5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Torre F, Cisneros-Cabello R, Aranguren E, Estévez R, Velasco-Ortega E. Single-rooted maxillary first molar with a single canal: endodontic retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:66–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cobankara FK, Terlemez A, Orucoglu H. Maxillary first molar with an unusual morphology: report of a rare case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:62–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: A pilot study. J Endod. 2010;36:867–70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loannidis K, Lambrianidis T, Beltes P, Besi E, Malliari M. Endodontic management and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of seven maxillary and mandibular molars with single roots and single canals in a patient. J Endod. 2011;37:103–9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim Y, Lee S, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molar analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012;38:1063–8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Sultan Qaboos University

RESOURCES