Abstract
Background
To compare efficacy of simvastatin with GnRHa (Decapeptyl 3.75 mg) on endometriosis-related pains following surgery for endometriosis.
Material/Methods
Sixty women with pelvic endometriosis, after laparoscopic diagnosis and conservative laparoscopic surgery, were treated with either simvastatin (n=30) for 16 weeks or Decapeptyl (n=30) every 4 weeks for 4 doses.
Results
Using VAS, the score of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain 6 months after laparoscopic surgery declined significantly in both groups (p=0.001), but the difference between results of the 2 groups was not significant (p>0.05).
Conclusions
Both treatment modalities showed comparable effectiveness in the treatment of pains related to endometriosis.
Keywords: statin, GnRHa, endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia
Background
The presence of endometrial glandular and stromal cells outside the uterine cavity is called endometriosis. Endometriosis is one of the most common benign diseases affecting quality of life and fertility of women. Endometriosis is diagnosed by visual inspection of the pelvis during laparoscopy and positive histology confirms the diagnosis, but negative histology does not exclude it [1]. Multiple factors are responsible for endometriosis. The most important one is regurgitation of menstrual blood, but cytokines play a critical role in facilitation of the implantation of ectopic endometrial tissues [2]. Numerous data indicate that eutopic endometrial glandular and stromal cells may be functioning differently in women with endometriosis compared to normal endometrium in disease-free women [3]. Expression of Importin13, a possible marker for endometrial stem cells, compared to secretory endometrium, might support the hypothesis that this disease originates from stem cells [4]. The most prominent symptoms of endometriosis are dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility. All endometriosis lesion types are associated with pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea. Current treatment of endometriosis is mainly based on surgery and ovarian suppressive agents. Some medical treatments have been suggested for endometriosis, including oral contraceptive pills, medroxy progesterone acetate, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) [1]. In some studies statins were effective in prevention of endometriotic cells proliferation in vitro.
Statins are potent inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis to reduce serum cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidemia. Statins act by inhibiting 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl Glutaryl Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase to block the conversion of HMG-CoA to L-mevalonate, a rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. Statins were effective in inhibiting the mechanisms of cell proliferation and angiogenesis in experimental models for the development of endometriosis-like tissue [5–7]. In 1 study using a nude mouse model, simvastatin induced a dose-dependent decrease of the number and size of endometrial implants in mice. At the highest dose of simvastatin, the number of endometrial implants decreased by 87% and the volume by 98% [8]. In another study on endometriotic cyst walls and endometrial biopsy in vitro, atorvastatin treatment had no effect on 17βE2 levels in endometriotic stromal cell culture supernatant, and concluded that atorvastatin can be used as a treatment for endometriosis in humans [9].
Different studies have suggested that the role of statins in inhibition of aromatase activity may represent a new therapeutic option for endometriosis. After approval by ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) and after counseling with patients with pelvic endometriosis, we compared the clinical symptoms of patients after prescription of GnRHa with simvastatin.
Material and Methods
This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of simvastatin with that of GnRHa treatment, after surgery for endometriosis, on pain due to endometriosis. In our gynecology ward, all the patients with the laparoscopic diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis were included in the study. All of the subjects underwent conservative laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, using the triple puncture technique. In laparoscopy, the surgeons tried to excise or ablate all the endometriotic implants and performed adhesiolysis. The night before laparoscopy, a data collection form was completed by a physician. The cause of laparoscopy and the severity of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain were estimated by use of the Visual Analogue Scale test (VAS test), with a score of 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain ever experienced. After the operation, the severity of endometriosis was entered into the data collection form as revised according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification for endometriosis [1,10]. The staging was done intraoperatively by the 2 surgeons who were involved in the operations. Following ethics committee approval and obtaining informed consent in cases of simvastatin prescription, we prescribed simvastatin (film-coated tablet simvaHEXAL, 20 mg daily for 4 months) or GnRHa (Decapeptyl 3.75 mg IM each 28 day period for 4 doses) at the time of discharge. The patients were randomly assigned to either the simvastatin or Decapeptyl group (assigned to each group alternately in order of admission). Although the patient selection was random, in patients who wanted to become pregnant immediately, we had the obligation to prescribe simvastatin rather than GnRHa. None of the patients had a history of previous surgery or GnRHa treatment. We followed the patients for continuation of drugs and adverse effects of simvastatin. Each group had 30 patients and we tried to match the two groups for age, the severity of endometriosis and severity of endometriotic pain. Six months after operation, we reassessed the patients’ symptoms by VAS.
We analyzed the data by SPSS 13, using the KS test (one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) for normality of data distribution, Levene’s test for equality of variances, and independent samples t-test for equality of means for comparing quantitative normal data between the 2 groups, paired sample t-tests for comparing quantitative normal data between before and after treatment in each group and Pearson chi-square test for matching and comparing categorical variables between the 2 groups. According to the KS test, we compared the non-normal quantitative data by Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test between the 2 groups and Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparing before and after treatment data in each group.
Results
In these 60 patients, 40 had endometrioma of ovary; the size of endometrioma was most often 3–10 centimeters (n=37). In this study, marital status of the 2 patient groups – the simvastatin group (S) and the GnRHa group (G) – was matched (P=0.793), but the difference for presence of endometrioma between the two groups was significant (P=0.045), (Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparison of marital status in two patient groups.
| Drug | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin | GNRH | ||||
| Marital status | Single | Count | 12 | 13 | 25 |
| Percent | 40.0% | 43.3% | 41.7% | ||
| Married | Count | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| Percent | 60.0% | 56.7% | 58.3% | ||
| Endometrioma | No or <3cm | Count | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| Percent | 40.0% | 16.7% | 28.3% | ||
| ≥3 cm | Count | 18 | 25 | 43 | |
| Percent | 60.0% | 83.3% | 71.7% | ||
| Total | Count | 30 | 30 | 60 | |
| Percent | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
The major reasons for laparoscopy in the simvastatin group were infertility (40.0%) and ovarian cyst (33.3%) and ovarian cyst (40.0%) and dysmenorrhea (30.0%) in the GNRHa group (Table 2).
Table 2.
Frequency of different reasons for laparoscopy in two groups.
| Different reasons | Drug | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin | GNRH | |||
| Infertility | Count | 12 | 4 | 16 |
| Percent | 40.0% | 13.3% | 26.7% | |
| Dysmenorrhea | Count | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Percent | 10.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% | |
| Dyspareunia | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Percent | 3.3% | .0% | 1.7% | |
| Pelvic pain | Count | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Percent | 10.0% | 13.3% | 11.7% | |
| Ovarian cyst | Count | 10 | 12 | 22 |
| Percent | 33.3% | 40.0% | 36.7% | |
| Infertility&ovarian cyst | Count | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Percent | .0% | 3.3% | 1.7% | |
| Infertility&ovarian cyst& dysmenorrhea | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Percent | 3.3% | .0% | 1.7% | |
| Total | Count | 30 | 30 | 60 |
| Percent | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Severity of endometriosis in the 2 patient groups was not significantly different (P=0.253) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Severity of endometriosis in two patient groups.
| Severity of endometriosis | Drug | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin | GNRH | |||
| Minimal+mild | Count | 13 | 9 | 22 |
| Percent | 43.3% | 30.0% | 36.7% | |
| Moderate | Count | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| Percent | 33.3% | 26.7% | 30.0% | |
| Severe | Count | 7 | 13 | 20 |
| Percent | 23.3% | 43.3% | 33.3% | |
| Total | Count | 30 | 30 | 60 |
| Percent | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
The severity of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain before and after treatment were not significantly different between the 2 groups (Table 4). However, after treatment, the severity of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain in the 2 groups was significantly reduced and the difference between before and after treatment in 3 parameters in each group was significant (Table 5). None of the patients showed adverse effects of simvastatin and all continued medical treatment for 4 months. Three of the patients in the simvastatin group became pregnant 4 months after surgery. All of them had mild endometriosis.
Table 4.
comparison of age and severity of dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain in two patient groups.
| Drug | N | Mean | Std. deviation | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Simvastatin | 30 | 28.83 | 5.814 | 0.614 |
| GNRH | 30 | 29.77 | 5.643 | ||
| Dyspareunia before | Simvastatin | 18 | 3.39 | 3.146 | 0.858 |
| GNRH | 17 | 3.59 | 3.318 | ||
| Dysmenorrhea before | Simvastatin | 30 | 6.00 | 2.613 | 0.185 |
| GNRH | 30 | 6.63 | 3.211 | ||
| Pelvic pain before | Simvastatin | 30 | 4.33 | 3.294 | 0.358 |
| GNRH | 30 | 5.07 | 3.107 | ||
| Dyspareunia after | Simvastatin | 18 | 1.06 | 1.349 | 0.386 |
| GNRH | 17 | 1.59 | 1.661 | ||
| Dysmenorrhea after | Simvastatin | 30 | 3.40 | 2.799 | 0.845 |
| GNRH | 30 | 3.17 | 2.052 | ||
| Pelvic pain after | Simvastatin | 30 | 1.97 | 2.042 | 0.083 |
| GNRH | 30 | 2.83 | 2.001 | ||
| Dysmenorrhea(difference between before and after treatment) | Simvastatin | 30 | 2.60 | 2.486 | 0.152 |
| GNRH | 30 | 3.47 | 2.129 | ||
| Pelvic pain (difference between before and after treatment) | Simvastatin | 30 | 2.37 | 2.773 | 0.882 |
| GNRH | 30 | 2.23 | 1.654 | ||
| Dyspareunia (difference between before and after treatment) | Simvastatin | 18 | 2.33 | 2.275 | 0.807 |
| GNRH | 17 | 2.00 | 1.936 |
Table 5.
Comparison of parameters before and after treatment in each group.
| Mean | N | Std. deviation | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin | Dyspareunia before | 3.39 | 18 | 3.146 | <0.001 |
| Dyspareunia after | 1.06 | 18 | 1.349 | ||
| Dysmenorrhea before | 6.00 | 30 | 2.613 | <0.001 | |
| Dysmenorrhea after | 3.40 | 30 | 2.799 | ||
| Pelvic pain before | 4.33 | 30 | 3.294 | <0.001 | |
| Pelvic pain after | 1.97 | 30 | 2.042 | ||
| GNRH | Dyspareunia before | 3.59 | 17 | 3.318 | 0.001 |
| Dyspareunia after | 1.59 | 17 | 1.661 | ||
| Dysmenorrhea before | 6.63 | 30 | 3.211 | <0.001 | |
| Dysmenorrhea after | 3.17 | 30 | 2.052 | ||
| Pelvic pain before | 5.07 | 30 | 3.107 | <0.001 | |
| Pelvic pain after | 2.83 | 30 | 2.001 |
Discussion
The major finding of this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of simvastatin versus Decapeptyl in the treatment of endometriotic pains was that after ablative surgery, prescription of simvastatin or Decapeptyl resulted in no significant difference in outcome.
Endometriosis is a common, often painful, condition, frequently associated with infertility. Endometriosis is found in 33% of infertile women [1]. Laparoscopy is recognized as the first option for diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis, but the rate of pain recurrence after conservative surgery is high. GnRH agonists have long been used successfully in the treatment of endometriosis [1,11–15], but because of their adverse effects (loss of bone minerals and vasomotor symptoms), physicians need better choices.
Statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), have been shown to decrease proliferation of several mesenchymal tissues. Actions of statins may be related to decrease in availability of cholesterol, as well as intermediate metabolites of mevalonate pathway downstream of HMGCR. Statin affects the growth of endometriotic tissues by inhibiting angiogenesis [8,16]. This could be important in non-hormonal and non-surgical treatment of endometriosis. The effectiveness of simvastatin in inhibition of endometriotic tissue has been confirmed in vitro. Proliferation of endometrial stromal cells has been inhibited with simvastatin in endometrial tissue obtained from 4 women with endometriosis. Therefore, it is suggested that simvastatin could potentially be a therapeutic agent for treatment of endometriosis [7]. The in vitro studies demonstrated that simvastatin induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of human endometrial stromal cell proliferation, evidenced by reduced DNA synthesis and a decrease in number of viable cells [7]. It has also shown that simvastatin inhibits the proliferation of stromal cells derived from human endometriotic implants in ovaries [5].
Simvastatin reduced both the number and volume of endometriotic lesions in nude mice in a dose-dependent manner. About 85% of the mice in the control group developed lesions, whereas 58% of the mice receiving low-dose simvastatin and only 17% of those given high-dose simvastatin had lesions. These findings suggested that the use of statins for treatment of endometriosis can be effective [8,17].
In our study, after conservative surgical treatment, the result of prescription of simvastatin (20 mg daily for 4 months) was similar to Decapeptyl (3.75 mg IM for 4 doses) in control of endometriotic pain.
Limitations of study
Our study has some limitations. The sample size was small and the study must be repeated with larger sample sizes and with other doses of simvastatin. In addition, none of the patients accepted second-look laparoscopy to evaluate size and number of endometriotic lesions after medical treatment. Finally, our study lacked a third group without medical treatment after conservative surgical treatment.
The important aspect of this study is that it is the first to evaluate use of simvastatin to relieve endometriotic pains.
Further investigations without the limitations of the present study should provide more precise assessment of the effects of simvastatin on endometriotic lesions.
Conclusions
GnRHa is one of the most accepted medical treatments of endometriosis, but the role of statins in endometriosis had been assessed only in vitro or in animal models. Our study assessed the effect of simvastatin on symptoms of endometriosis and found that it is comparable with Decapeptyl.
Footnotes
Source of support: Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasool Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (T.U.M.S), Tehran, Iran
References
- 1.D’Hooghe TM. Endometriosis. In: Berek JS, editor. Berek & Novak’s gynecology. 15th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wlilkins; 2012. pp. 505–57. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barcz E, Kamiński P, Marianowski L. Role of cytokines in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med Sci Monit. 2000;6(5):1042–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu H, Lang J. Is abnormal eutopic endometrium the cause of endometriosis? The role of eutopic endometrium in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(4):RA92–99. doi: 10.12659/MSM.881707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zeng B, Hu J, Yuan R, et al. Increased expression of importin13 in endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(6):CR361–67. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nasu K, Yuge A, Tsuno A, Narahara H. Simvastatin inhibits the proliferation and the contractility of human endometriotic stromal cells: a promising agent for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(6):2097–99. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Esfandiari N, Khazaei M, Ai J, et al. Effect of a statin on an in vitro model of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):257–62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Piotrowski PC, Kwintkiewicz J, Rzepczynska IJ, et al. Statins inhibit growth of human endometrial stromal cells independently of cholesterol availability. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(1):107–11. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bruner-Tran KL, Osteen KG, Duleba AJ. Simvastatin protects against the development of endometriosis in a nude mouse model. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(7):2489–94. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sharma I, Dhawan V, Mahajan N, et al. In vitro effects of atorvastatin on lipopolysaccharide-induced gene expression in endometriotic stromal cells. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1639–46. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bayoglu Tekin Y, Dilbaz B, Altinbas SK, Dilbaz S. Postoperative medical treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to severe endometriosis: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):492–96. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schroder AK, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Medical management of endometriosis: a systematic review. IDrugs. 2004;7(5):451–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prentice A, Deary AJ, Goldbeck-Wood S, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000346. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999; (2): CD000346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anaf V, Vanden Bossche MV, Simon P, et al. Persisting active and proliferative intrinsic ureteral endometriosis under GNRH agonists therapy: a case with immunohistological study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;97(2):250–54. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00531-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schindler AE, Foertig P, Kienle E, Regidor PA. Early treatment of endometriosis with GnRH-agonists: impact on time to recurrence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;93(2):123–5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim NY, Ryoo U, Lee DY, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of short-term low-dose estrogen-only add-back therapy during post-operative GnRH agonist treatment for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(1):85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moon SH, Lee SE, Kim HG, et al. Effects of simvastatin on the proliferation and apoptosis of human endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(2):160–68. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang HQ, Li YL, Zou J. Effect of recombinant human endostatin on endometriosis in mice. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007;120(14):1241–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]