Abstract
Background:
Long-term survival after lung transplant is limited by the development of chronic and progressive airflow obstruction, a condition known as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). While prior studies strongly implicate cellular rejection as a strong risk factor for BOS, less is known about the clinical significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and donor HLA-specific antibodies in long-term outcomes.
Methods:
A single-center cohort of 441 lung transplant recipients, spanning a 10-year period, was prospectively screened for HLA antibodies after transplant using flow cytometry-based methods. The prevalence of and predictors for HLA antibodies were determined. The impact of HLA antibodies on survival after transplant and the development of BOS were determined using Cox models.
Results:
Of the 441 recipients, 139 (32%) had detectable antibodies to HLA. Of these 139, 54 (39%) developed antibodies specific to donor HLA. The detection of posttransplant HLA antibodies was associated with BOS (HR, 1.54; P = .04) and death (HR, 1.53; P = .02) in multivariable models. The detection of donor-specific HLA antibodies was associated with death (HR, 2.42; P < .0001). The detection of posttransplant HLA antibodies was associated with pretransplant HLA-antibody detection, platelet transfusions, and the development of BOS and cytomegalovirus pneumonitis.
Conclusions:
Approximately one-third of lung transplant recipients have detectable HLA antibodies, which are associated with a worse prognosis regarding graft function and patient survival.
Long-term outcomes after lung transplant are limited by the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a condition of progressive airflow decline. One of the strongest risk factors for BOS is the number and severity of acute cellular rejection episodes marked by T-cell infiltrates around blood vessels and bronchioles in the allograft.1 More recently, antibody-mediated, humoral or B-cell, rejection is being recognized as a possible risk factor for poor long-term outcomes in solid-organ transplantation. Initial reports from renal transplant recipients described endothelial injury that was distinctly different from cellular rejection and that corresponded to clinical decline.2,3 In addition, complement split products in tissue samples and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies detected in serum corresponded to allograft dysfunction.4‐6 In lung transplant, centers have reported widely varying rates of antibody-mediated rejection based on a tissue diagnosis.7‐9 The difficulties of a tissue diagnosis in lung transplant antibody rejection are evidenced by the inability of two national conferences on allograft rejection to create a consensus definition.10,11
Rather than focus on tissue, many centers are using serum HLA antibodies to identify possible antibody-mediated rejection. Recent advances in the determination of HLA antibodies by solid-phase technologies have increased the sensitivity and specificity of HLA-antibody detection. While likely not the only antibodies produced in this type of rejection, HLA antibodies provide a marker for B-cell activation. To our knowledge, our group was one of the first to report that lung transplant recipients who develop donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a higher risk of developing BOS and of worse posttransplant survival compared with individuals who did not develop DSA.12 Subsequent studies have confirmed that pretransplant presence of HLA antibodies is associated with worse survival, and in small series, HLA antibodies detected posttransplant are associated with rejection and allograft dysfunction.12‐15 More recently, a prospective study at a single center noted that recipients with DSA who received treatment did not have an increased risk for acute cellular rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, BOS, or worse survival.16
Given the diverse reports on the incidence of HLA antibodies and association with allograft dysfunction, we sought to review our large recipient cohort with extended longitudinal follow-up for HLA antibodies and to outline the risk factors for and incidence and implications of detection of HLA antibodies after lung transplant. Since 2000, we have used a prospective screening protocol for HLA antibodies. We specifically focused on HLA antibodies, given the lack of consensus regarding a histologic definition of antibody rejection.
Materials and Methods
Study Cohort
Adults (≥18 years old) receiving a first, cadaveric lung transplant at Duke University Medical Center between January 1, 2000, and October 1, 2008, with at least 30-day survival were eligible for this study. Multiorgan, living lobar, and retransplant recipients were excluded. All recipients received standardized immunosuppression, pulmonary function tests, and transbronchial biopsies as described in the supplemental material (e-Appendix 1 (336.8KB, pdf) ).17 The study was approved through the Duke University institutional review board (IRB#00007005).
HLA Antibody Determination and Screening Protocol
Prior to transplant and serially after transplant, all recipients are screened for the presence and specificity of HLA antibodies. Routine screening is done to coincide with surveillance bronchoscopies at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Additional HLA antibody screens are performed in the setting of clinical decline. Data collection for this analysis ended April 1, 2011.
Allograft Assessments
Acute rejection was defined as perivascular infiltrates detected on transbronchial biopsies as described by International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) guidelines.11 We used a time-dependent acute rejection ratio (ARR), where the sum of the ISHLT grade A scores was divided by the total number of transbronchial biopsies and considered as a time-dependent predictor. BOS was defined as progressive airflow obstruction according to the ISHLT guidelines.18 In addition, to be eligible for our BOS analysis, recipients had posttransplant survival of ≥ 90 days and had undergone at least five pulmonary function tests. Primary allograft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 was defined by a Pao2/Fio2 ratio < 200 at 72 h posttransplant and the presence of radiographic infiltrates.19 Recipients who were on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 h posttransplant were considered to have PGD grade 3.
Statistical Analysis
Demographic variables were compared between individuals with and without HLA antibodies using χ2, Fisher, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of both time-dependent and time-independent covariates on allograft survival, BOS, and detection of posttransplant HLA antibodies and DSA. The first episodes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis, ARR, detection of HLA antibodies, and DSA were all limited to occurrence prior to BOS onset and were considered time-dependent covariates. The selection of predictor variables was based upon statistical differences between patients with and without HLA antibodies and prior published risk factors. In addition, the development of BOS and detection of HLA antibodies and DSA were also considered time-dependent covariates in the survival model; HLA antibodies and DSA also were considered time-dependent covariates in the BOS model. Each predictor variable was first entered into a univariate model; those meeting a significance level ≤ .05 were included in the multivariable regression model. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc).
Results
Study Cohort Demographics and HLA Evaluation
There were 460 lung transplant recipients who met initial inclusion criteria and were eligible for analysis. A total of 5,813 individual serum samples were evaluated for HLA antibodies, including 2,119 pretransplant samples and 3,694 posttransplant samples. Of these 460 recipients, 19 were subsequently excluded from the analysis because they had no posttransplant HLA-antibody tests. Of the remaining 441 subjects, 139 (32%) had detectable HLA antibodies; these composed the positive HLA-antibody cohort. The remaining 302 (71%) subjects composed the negative HLA-antibody cohort. HLA antibody-positive recipients were more likely to be female; non-white; have detectable, pretransplant HLA antibodies; have received platelets or cryoprecipitate during the first 30 days after transplant; be discharged on mycophenolate mofetil; and to have had a retrospective positive crossmatch at the time of transplant (Table 1). Of the 139 recipients with positive HLA antibodies posttransplant, 108 (78%) had their first detectable HLA antibody within the first year after transplant, and 54 (39%) developed DSA. The median time to DSA development was 52 days posttransplant (interquartile range [IQR], 19-769).
Table 1.
Characteristics | Not HLA Positive Posttransplant (n = 302) | HLA Positive Posttransplant (n = 139) | P Value |
Male sex | 183 (61) | 67 (48) | .01 |
Race | .01 | ||
White | 278 (92) | 114 (82) | |
Black | 24 (7) | 22 (16) | |
Other | 2 (1) | 3 (2) | |
HLA-positive antibody pretransplant | 22 (7) | 63 (45) | <.0001 |
Bilateral transplant | 291 (96) | 138 (99) | .11 |
Native disease | .08 | ||
Cystic | 60 (20) | 14 (10) | |
Obstructive | 120 (40) | 65 (47) | |
Restrictive | 114 (38) | 56 (40) | |
Vascular | 8 (3) | 4 (3) | |
Age at transplant, median (IQR), y | 57 (44-63) | 53 (47-61) | .76 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 h after transplant | 34 (11) | 19 (14) | .48 |
Positive crossmatch | 0 (0) | 3 (2) | .01 |
Recipients receiving blood products in first 30 d after transplant | |||
RBCs | 282 (93) | 134 (96) | .20 |
Platelets | 104 (34) | 71 (51) | .0009 |
Plasma | 196 (65) | 94 (68) | .58 |
Cryoprecipitate | 32 (11) | 32 (23) | .0006 |
Study days, median (IQR) | 1,752 (1,140-2,558) | 1,447 (861-19,52) | .003 |
Died during study period | 114 (38) | 73 (53) | .004 |
Reached BOS status during study perioda | 117 (41) | 64 (50) | .06 |
Posttransplant HLA tests per patient, median (IQR), No. | 6 (4-9) | 11 (8-16) | <.0001 |
Data given as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. BOS = bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; IQR = interquartile range; PGD = primary graft dysfunction.
Based on 415 eligible recipients.
Posttransplant HLA Antibodies Are Associated With BOS
Of the 441 subjects in the cohort, 415 were eligible for BOS assessment. Of these, 181 (44%) developed BOS during the analysis study period (median follow-up time, 4.68 years). The detection of HLA antibodies was a risk factor for BOS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.13-2.18). The detection of DSA was not a significant predictor for BOS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.84-2.55; P = .19). In the univariate analysis, pretransplant antibodies, type of transplant, PGD grade 3, and ARR were significantly associated with the development of BOS (Table 2). In our cohort, community-acquired viral infections, pathogenic Aspergillus pulmonary infections, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection or colonization prior to the development of BOS were not different between those with and without BOS, and these infections were not associated with BOS in our cohort. In a multivariable regression model, the detection of HLA antibodies remained a significant predictor for BOS when controlling for pretransplant antibodies, type of transplant, PGD grade 3, and ARR (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.29; P = .04) (Table 3).
Table 2.
Risk Factors | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Age > 56 y | 1.06 (0.79-1.42) | .72 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 1.59 (1.11-2.26) | .01 |
Bilateral transplant | 0.40 (0.21-0.76) | .005 |
Positive crossmatch | 3.59 (0.50-26.1) | .21 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 ha | 1.54 (1.02-2.34) | .04 |
CMV pneumonitisb | 1.21 (0.85-1.72) | .30 |
ARRb | 1.80 (1.13-2.87) | .014 |
Detection of HLA antibodiesb | 1.57 (1.13-2.18) | .007 |
Detection of DSAb | 1.45 (0.84-2.552) | .19 |
ARR = acute rejection ratio; CMV = cytomegalovirus; DSA = donor human leukocyte antigen-specific antibodies; HR = hazard ratio. See Table 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviations.
Limited to 356 recipients with repeat arterial blood gas values in first 72 h.
Events considered before the development of BOS and in a time-dependent manner.
Table 3.
Posttransplant HLA Antibodies Are Associated With Worse Survival
During the study period, 187 of the 441 subjects (42%) died (median survival, 4.36 years; IQR, 2.97-6.69). Detection of HLA antibodies posttransplant was associated with worse survival in univariate analysis (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.81-3.27; P < .0001). Several variables were considered in separate univariate survival analyses (Table 4). Older age, native lung disease (cystic or restrictive), positive crossmatch, pretransplant HLA-antibody status, PGD grade 3, CMV pneumonitis, and BOS were significantly associated with worse survival in the univariate analysis and therefore were included in the multivariable analysis (Table 5). The detection of HLA antibodies posttransplant remained a significant predictor of worse survival in the multivariate survival model (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.21; P = .02).
Table 4.
Risk Factors | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Age > 56 y at transplant | 1.37 (1.03-1.83) | .03 |
Sex | 0.99 (0.74-1.33) | .96 |
White race | 0.79 (0.51-1.23) | .30 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 1.92 (1.38-2.66) | <.0001 |
Positive crossmatch | 4.71 (1.15-19.3) | .03 |
Native lung disease (reference group: all others) | ||
Cystic | 0.53 (0.34-0.82) | .005 |
Obstructive | 1.03 (0.77-1.38) | .84 |
Vascular | 0.96 (0.36-2.59) | .96 |
Restrictive | 1.39 (1.04-1.86) | .03 |
Bilateral transplant | 0.72 (0.37-1.41) | .34 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 h | 1.56 (1.00-2.42) | .05 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 1.65 (1.19-2.28) | .003 |
Detection of HLA antibodiesa | 2.43 (1.81-3.27) | <.0001 |
Development of BOSa | 12.9 (9.08-18.4) | <.0001 |
Development of DSAa | 3.43 (2.37-4.98) | <.0001 |
Development of DSA class Ia | 3.49 (2.17-5.62) | <.0001 |
Development of DSA class IIa | 4.23 (2.80-6.37) | <.0001 |
Table 5.
Risk Factors | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Age > 56 y at transplant | 1.24 (0.89-1.76) | .21 |
Cystic | 1.01 (0.59-1.73) | .97 |
Restrictive | 1.21 (0.86-1.70) | .27 |
Positive crossmatch | 1.98 (0.44-8.94) | .37 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 1.26 (0.84-1.89) | .28 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 h | 1.25 (0.73-2.14) | .41 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 1.38 (0.97-1.97) | .07 |
Development of BOSa | 12.08 (8.46-17.2) | <.0001 |
Detection of HLA antibodiesa | 1.53 (1.07-2.21) | .02 |
Posttransplant DSA Is Associated With Worse Survival
In the univariate analysis, the first detection of DSA as a time-dependent predictor was associated with worse survival (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.37-4.98; P ≤ .0001). DSA class I or DSA class II modeled as time-dependent predictors in separate univariate analyses were also associated with worse survival (class I HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.17-5.62; P ≤ .0001; class II HR, 4.23; 95% CI, 2.80-6.37; P ≤ .0001). The development of any DSA, DSA class I, and DSA class II were considered in separate multivariable models that included age, pretransplant HLA-antibody status, native lung disease, PGD grade 3, CMV pneumonitis, and BOS. Controlling for these other variables, the detection of any DSA was a significant predictor for worse survival (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.51-3.78; P = .0002) (Table 6). In a separate multivariable survival analysis, both the detection of DSA class I (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.34-4.41; P = .003) and the detection of DSA class II (HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.96-4.97; P ≤ .0001) also predicted worse survival after lung transplant (Table 7).
Table 6.
Risk Factors | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Age > 56 y at transplant | 1.28 (0.91-1.80) | .16 |
Cystic | 1.10 (0.64-1.88) | .74 |
Restrictive | 1.13 (0.80-1.60) | .48 |
Positive crossmatch | 1.24 (0.27-5.69) | .79 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 1.31 (0.90-1.92) | .16 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 h | 1.30 (0.76-2.22) | .34 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 1.45 (1.02-2.06) | .04 |
Development of BOSa | 12.57 (8.80-17.98) | <.0001 |
Development of DSAa | 2.39 (1.51-3.78) | .0002 |
Table 7.
Risk Factors | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Age > 56 y at transplant | 1.24 (0.88-1.74) | .22 |
Cystic | 1.06 (0.62-1.80) | .85 |
Restrictive | 1.16 (0.82-1.64) | .40 |
PGD grade 3 at 72 h | 1.21 (0.71-2.07) | .48 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 1.54 (1.09-2.17) | .02 |
Development of BOSa | 12.96 (9.07-18.52) | <.0001 |
Development of DSA class Ia | 2.43 (1.34-4.41) | .003 |
Development of DSA class IIa | 3.12 (1.96-4.97) | <.0001 |
Predictors for HLA Detection After Transplant
In univariate Cox regression analyses, sex, race, positive crossmatch, platelet transfusion, cryoprecipitate transfusion, pretransplant HLA antibodies, CMV pneumonitis (prior to HLA antibody detection), and the development of BOS (prior to HLA antibody detection) were associated with posttransplant HLA antibodies (Table 8) and, therefore, included in the multivariable model. Of note, all of the recipients had at least one posttransplant HLA-antibody test prior to the development of CMV or BOS. In the multivariable model, platelet transfusion (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05-2.33; P = .03), pretransplant HLA antibodies (HR, 6.19; 95% CI, 4.35-8.81; P ≤ .0001), CMV pneumonitis (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.08-3.79; P = .03), and the development of BOS (HR, 9.53; 95% CI, 5.40-16.8; P ≤ .0001) remained significant predictors for HLA antibodies after transplant (Table 9).
Table 8.
Predictor | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Female sex | 1.59 (1.14-2.22) | .006 |
White race | 0.48 (0.31-0.75) | .001 |
Positive crossmatch | 5.34 (1.68-16.9) | .004 |
Platelet transfusion within 30 d of transplant | 1.79 (1.29-2.50) | .0006 |
Cryoprecipitate transfusion within 30 d of transplant | 1.89 (1.72-2.80) | .0016 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 6.86 (4.88-9.63) | <.0001 |
Development of BOSa | 3.77 (1.85-7.66) | .0003 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 2.04 (1.10-3.81) | .02 |
Table 9.
Predictor | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Female sex | 1.30 (0.92-184 | .14 |
White race | 0.69 (0.44-1.09) | .69 |
Positive crossmatch | 1.13 (0.35-3.71) | .84 |
Platelet transfusion within 30 d of transplant | 1.56 (1.05-2.33) | .03 |
Cryoprecipitate transfusion within 30 d of transplant | 1.17 (0.73-1.89) | .51 |
Pretransplant HLA-antibody positive | 6.19 (4.35-8.81) | <.0001 |
Development of BOSa | 9.53 (5.40-16.8) | <.0001 |
Development of CMV pneumonitisa | 2.03 (1.08-3.79) | .03 |
Predictors for DSA Detection After Transplant
Given the relatively few DSA events in our study cohort, we limited our analysis to three predictors that were the strongest predictors for HLA antibodies after lung transplant: pretransplant HLA antibodies, CMV pneumonitis (prior to DSA detection), and the development of BOS (prior to DSA detection). In separate univariate analyses, pretransplant HLA antibodies and the development of BOS were significant and included in the multivariable model (Table 10). Both pretransplant HLA antibodies (HR, 3.68; 95% CI, 2.07-6.54; P ≤ .0001) and the development of BOS (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.16-14.8; P = .0004) remained significant predictors for the development of DSA after lung transplant (Table 11).
Table 10.
Table 11.
Predictor | HR (95% CI) | P Value |
Pretransplant detectable HLA antibody | 3.68 (2.07-6.54) | <.0001 |
Development of BOSa | 5.65 (2.16-14.8) | .0004 |
Discussion
In this large cohort of 441 lung transplant recipients, we have found a strong association between posttransplant HLA antibodies and the subsequent development of BOS and worse survival. Furthermore, the detection of DSA, particularly DSA class II, was associated with significantly worse survival than simply the presence of HLA antibodies. Although somewhat surprising, DSA was not associated with BOS. Our results add to the growing interest in the clinical significance of HLA antibodies by providing analysis of a large cohort, managed by protocol screening and with extended follow-up, which allowed for assessment of allograft function and survival.
There are several possible mechanisms by which antibodies may contribute to allograft dysfunction. Antibodies may promote complement deposition, directly damage the epithelium, or stimulate growth factors. Several reports have noted complement deposition in the allograft of recipients with circulating HLA antibodies.7,20 Another potential mechanism, supported by in vitro work, suggests human epithelial airway cells exposed to anti-HLA antibodies lead to increased levels of defensins, which, in turn, induce growth factor production and epithelial proliferation in a manner similar to obliterative bronchiolitis.21 Similarly, in vitro and animal fibrosis models indicate that HLA antibodies can promote profibrotic growth factors.22,23
Our findings that HLA-antibody detection is associated with the development of BOS is consistent with other, smaller studies.12,15 Surprisingly, our analysis did not find that DSA was a predictor for BOS, although it was associated with worse survival. This may reflect the competing risk for death and BOS in this group. We did consider the possibility that the increased risk of mortality was related to DSA treatment. However, only two of the 33 deaths were both within 1 year after increased immunosuppression and related to infection. Alternatively, this may indicate that our study is underpowered for BOS in the DSA cohort, given the relatively low incidence of DSA. Importantly, our incidence of DSA is similar to that of abdominal solid-organ transplant reports but notably lower than another study of 122 lung transplant recipients in which over one-half the cohort had DSA.16,24,25 In addition, that particular study did not find an increase in BOS or worse survival with DSA; however, the follow-up period was considerably shorter than our analysis.
Leveraging a large number of samples, lung transplant recipients, and outcome events, we were able to identify specific risk factors for posttransplant HLA antibodies. Our finding of sex and pretransplant presence of HLA antibodies as risk factors for posttransplant HLA antibodies is not surprising. Prior reports noted more complications and worse survival in lung transplant recipients with pretransplant HLA antibodies.13,26,27 In retrospect, this may have reflected posttransplant HLA-antibody presence, as our analysis found a strong relationship between pretransplant and posttransplant HLA antibodies. In considering HLA exposure, we assessed blood product transfusions within 30 days of transplant as risk factors for HLA-antibody development. We noted that platelets and cryoprecipitate transfusions were strong risk factors for the detection of HLA antibodies after transplant, likely reflecting the potential for HLA exposure of pooled donor blood products. Surprisingly, PGD grade 3 was not associated with pretransplant or posttransplant HLA-antibody detection. As PGD is associated with BOS and worse survival, we initially thought there may be a link to HLA antibodies. Our analysis did not confirm that, though we are limited by the relatively low incidence of PGD grade 3 in our cohort. However, our finding that the development of BOS and viral pneumonitis prior to HLA-antibody detection are risk factors for antibody detection is novel and highlights our limited understanding of the triggers for antibody production. This finding opens new avenues for understanding the mechanism of antibody-mediated rejection. However, the majority of the recipients had detectable HLA antibodies before they developed BOS or CMV pneumonitis. This calls for further exploration in other cohorts to validate the relationship.
One limitation of our study is the exclusive focus on HLA antibodies to define possible humoral rejection. This is a widely accepted and reproducible measure of humoral immunity, and, therefore, our study is applicable to the majority of lung transplant recipients. However, antibodies to other allograft antigens, including endothelial antigens, collagen type V, and K-α tubulin, have been implicated in humoral rejection.28‐30 Recent reports in renal and heart transplant noted that complement-fixing HLA antibodies may offer more specificity in risk of graft dysfunction than just HLA-antibody measurements or mean fluorescence intensity.31,32 Although controversial, pathology may also offer an alternative approach to define humoral rejection. The optimal antibody and assay for humoral rejection may still be evolving.
It is important to note that the technology of antibody detection changed and improved over the course of this study, most notably in 2005 with the addition of single-antigen bead assays, as described in e-Appendix 1 (336.8KB, pdf) . Potentially, there were earlier-era samples with HLA antibodies and/or DSA present but not detected in the older technology. This could have biased our analysis against finding a difference, and thus strengthens our finding of an association with any detectable HLA antibodies and worse outcomes. Another limitation is the focus on the first HLA-antibody detection after transplant regardless of clinical status. Although we followed a specific protocol for HLA-antibody testing, we did not prospectively record the clinical events that may have prompted additional testing.
Despite these limitations, this analysis represents the most comprehensive, systematic analysis of HLA antibodies after lung transplant to date. We confirmed that HLA antibodies after lung transplant are associated with an increased risk for BOS and worse survival, and that DSA development is associated with worse survival. HLA antibodies appear to be an integral part of the immune response to the allograft both preceding graft dysfunction and after allograft dysfunction. A key question to address in further analysis is if the decrease or elimination of these antibodies correlates with improved outcomes.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Author contributions: Dr Snyder had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Dr Snyder: contributed to study design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and served as principal author.
Ms Wang: contributed to data collection and analysis and review of the manuscript.
Dr Chen: contributed to manuscript preparation and review.
Dr Reinsmoen: contributed to manuscript preparation and review.
Ms Finlen-Copeland: contributed to manuscript preparation and review.
Mr Davis: contributed to study design, data collection and analysis, and review of the manuscript.
Dr Zaas: contributed to study design and manuscript review.
Dr Palmer: contributed to study design, data analysis, and manuscript review.
Financial/nonfinancial disclosures: The authors have reported to CHEST that no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Role of sponsors: The sponsors had no role in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, or in the preparation of the manuscript.
Other contributions: The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Mary Lee Campbell, MT; Anthony Castleberry, MD; Matthew G. Hartwig, MD; Scott Shofer, MD, PhD; Jamie Todd, MD; and Wayne Tsuang, MD, to this study.
Additional information: The e-Appendix can be found in the “Supplemental Materials” area of the online article.
Abbreviations
- ARR
acute rejection ratio
- BOS
bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome
- CMV
cytomegalovirus
- DSA
donor human leukocyte antigen-specific antibodies
- HLA
human leukocyte antigen
- HR
hazard ratio
- IQR
interquartile range
- ISHLT
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant
- PGD
primary allograft dysfunction
Footnotes
Funding/Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [grant KL2RR024127] and the American Society of Transplantation Clinical Faculty Development Award (Dr Snyder), and by the NIH/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute SCCOR [grants 1P50-HL084917-01 and K24-091140-01] (Dr Palmer).
Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.
References
- 1.Estenne M, Hertz MI. Bronchiolitis obliterans after human lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(4):440-444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Halloran PF, Schlaut J, Solez K, Srinivasa NS. The significance of the anti-class I response. II. Clinical and pathologic features of renal transplants with anti-class I-like antibody. Transplantation. 1992;53(3):550-555 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Halloran PF, Wadgymar A, Ritchie S, Falk J, Solez K, Srinivasa NS. The significance of the anti-class I antibody response. I. Clinical and pathologic features of anti-class I-mediated rejection. Transplantation. 1990;49(1):85-91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crespo M, Pascual M, Tolkoff-Rubin N, et al. Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: I. Incidence, serology and clinical characteristics. Transplantation. 2001;71(5):652-658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Gouveia RH, Vitorino E, Ramos S, et al. C4d-the witness of humoral rejection. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(3):866-867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Collins AB, Schneeberger EE, Pascual MA, et al. Complement activation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(10):2208-2214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ionescu DN, Girnita AL, Zeevi A, et al. C4d deposition in lung allografts is associated with circulating anti-HLA alloantibody. Transpl Immunol. 2005;15(1):63-68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Magro CM, Deng A, Pope-Harman A, et al. Humorally mediated posttransplantation septal capillary injury syndrome as a common form of pulmonary allograft rejection: a hypothesis. Transplantation. 2002;74(9):1273-1280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Westall GP, Snell GI, McLean C, Kotsimbos T, Williams T, Magro C. C3d and C4d deposition early after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27(7):722-728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takemoto SK, Zeevi A, Feng S, et al. National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(7):1033-1041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stewart S, Fishbein MC, Snell GI, et al. Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(12):1229-1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Palmer SM, Davis RD, Hadjiliadis D, et al. Development of an antibody specific to major histocompatibility antigens detectable by flow cytometry after lung transplant is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Transplantation. 2002;74(6):799-804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hadjiliadis D, Chaparro C, Reinsmoen NL, et al. Pre-transplant panel reactive antibody in lung transplant recipients is associated with significantly worse post-transplant survival in a multicenter study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(7)(Suppl):S249-S254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Girnita AL, McCurry KR, Iacono AT, et al. HLA-specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(10):1135-1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Girnita AL, Duquesnoy R, Yousem SA, et al. HLA-specific antibodies are risk factors for lymphocytic bronchiolitis and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(1):131-138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hachem RR, Yusen RD, Meyers BF, et al. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and preemptive antibody-directed therapy after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(9):973-980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hartwig MG, Snyder LD, Finlen-Copeland A, et al. Lung transplantation at Duke University. Clin Transpl. 2009;197-210 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Estenne M, Maurer JR, Boehler A, et al. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome 2001: an update of the diagnostic criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21(3):297-310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Christie JD, Carby M, Bag R, Corris P, Hertz M, Weill D; ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction part II: definition. A consensus statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(10):1454-1459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Astor TL, Galantowicz M, Phillips A, Palafox J, Baker P. Pulmonary capillaritis as a manifestation of acute humoral allograft rejection following infant lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(2):409-412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Saini D, Angaswamy N, Tiriveedhi V, et al. Synergistic effect of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens and defensins in pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after human lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(12):1330-1336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jaramillo A, Smith CR, Maruyama T, Zhang L, Patterson GA, Mohanakumar T. Anti-HLA class I antibody binding to airway epithelial cells induces production of fibrogenic growth factors and apoptotic cell death: a possible mechanism for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Hum Immunol. 2003;64(5):521-529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fukami N, Ramachandran S, Saini D, et al. Antibodies to MHC class I induce autoimmunity: role in the pathogenesis of chronic rejection. J Immunol. 2009;182(1):309-318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cantarovich D, De Amicis S, Akl A, et al. Posttransplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies negatively impact pancreas transplantation outcome. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(12):2737-2746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ntokou IS, Iniotaki AG, Kontou EN, et al. Long-term follow up for anti-HLA donor specific antibodies postrenal transplantation: high immunogenicity of HLA class II graft molecules. Transpl Int. 2011;24(11):1084-1093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lau CL, Palmer SM, Posther KE, et al. Influence of panel-reactive antibodies on posttransplant outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(5):1520-1524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shah AS, Nwakanma L, Simpkins C, Williams J, Chang DC, Conte JV. Pretransplant panel reactive antibodies in human lung transplantation: an analysis of over 10,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(6):1919-1924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Magro CM, Klinger DM, Adams PW, et al. Evidence that humoral allograft rejection in lung transplant patients is not histocompatibility antigen-related. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(10):1264-1272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burlingham WJ, Love RB, Jankowska-Gan E, et al. IL-17-dependent cellular immunity to collagen type V predisposes to obliterative bronchiolitis in human lung transplants. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(11):3498-3506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goers TA, Ramachandran S, Aloush A, Trulock E, Patterson GA, Mohanakumar T. De novo production of K-alpha1 tubulin-specific antibodies: role in chronic lung allograft rejection. J Immunol. 2008;180(7):4487-4494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yabu JM, Higgins JP, Chen G, Sequeira F, Busque S, Tyan DB. C1q-fixing human leukocyte antigen antibodies are specific for predicting transplant glomerulopathy and late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2011;91(3):342-347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chin C, Chen G, Sequeria F, et al. Clinical usefulness of a novel C1q assay to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies capable of fixing complement in sensitized pediatric heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(2):158-163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.