Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Jun 20;1(3):e00208-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00208-13

Draft Genome Sequence of the Pediocin-Encoding Biopreservative and Biocontrol Strain Pediococcus acidilactici D3

Joseph M Sturino a,b,, Mahitha Rajendran b, Eric Altermann c,d
PMCID: PMC3707583  PMID: 23788534

Abstract

We describe a draft genome sequence for Pediococcus acidilactici strain D3, a component of multistrain commercial cultures with biopreservative and biocontrol properties in food-based applications. Strain D3 encodes at least one antimicrobial peptide, pediocin AMPd3. The AMPd3-encoding operon exhibits high sequence similarity to the archetype pediocin, PA-1, encoded by P. acidilactici PAC 1.0.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Approximately 1.3 billion tons of edible food is either lost or wasted annually, which represents nearly one-third of the global food mass that is produced for human consumption each year (1, 2). As the world population is expected to grow by more than 2.3 billion people between 2009 and 2050, the reduction of food loss and waste is a critical benchmark to improve food security and environmental sustainability across the globe (3). Innovative technologies, including biopreservative and biocontrol cultures, are being developed to address these grand challenges.

Biopreservative and biocontrol cultures are living microorganisms that, when applied in adequate amounts, extend the storage life and safety, respectively, of beverages, foods, or feeds without changing their organoleptic properties (4, 5). Pediococcus acidilactici D3 is a component of lactic acid bacterium (LAB)-based biocontrol cultures that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for use in meat products (6). The antimicrobial functionality of these cultures (7, 8, 9) is likely due, in part, to the production of bacteriocins and low-molecular-weight metabolites, including lactic acid (10, 11); however, strain-specific molecular and generic evidences to confirm these suppositions are lacking. As a result, a draft sequence of the D3 genome was generated and examined for genes that might explain its antimicrobial qualities.

To this end, a paired-end library of D3 genomic DNA was prepared and sequenced using the Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by the Texas AgriLife Genomics and Bioinformatics Center (College Station, TX). The size of the library inserts ranged from 197 to 557 nucleotides (mean, 305 nucleotides). Based on the size of the P. acidilactici DSMZ 20284T reference genome (1.93 Mb), a sequencing coverage of approximately 2,289-fold was inferred. The reads were assembled de novo with SPAdes version 2.2.1 (12). In total, 512 contigs with lengths of >1,000 bp were obtained.

Based upon alignments with the P. acidilactici neotype strain, DSMZ 20284T, a D3 pseudochromosome was generated using the FGD and ACT software packages (13, 14). The size (1,962,090 Mb) and G+C content (42.09%) of the D3 draft genome were comparable to those of other previously sequenced pediococci, including P. acidilactici MA18/5M (1.99 Mb and 42% G+C) (15) (GenBank accession no. AGKB00000000.1), P. acidilactici DSMZ 20284T (1.93 Mb and 42% G+C) (accession no. NZ_AEEG00000000.1), P. acidilactici 7_4 (2.01 Mb and 42% G+C) (accession no. NZ_ACXB00000000.1), and Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 25745 (1.83 Mb and 37.4% G+C) (accession no. CP000422).

Global Annotation of Mulitplexed On-site bLasted DNA-sequences (GAMOLA) version 2 was used to predict protein-coding domain sequences and to annotate the draft genome (16). Based on these analyses, 1,976 protein-coding genes were predicted. Unlike strains DSMZ 20284T, 7_4, and MA18/5M, D3 carries four genes (pedABCD) tentatively related to the immunity to and expression of an antimicrobial peptide (pediocin), designated AMPd3. The AMPd3-deduced protein sequence is identical to that of an archetype pediocin, PA-1, encoded by P. acidilactici PAC 1.0 (17).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The Whole-Genome Shotgun project was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AQGT00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, accession no. AQGT01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Guardian Food Technologies (Overland Park, KS) provided P. acidilactici D3 and funded this sequencing project. The sponsor had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, the production of the submitted manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

We thank Scott Schwartz, Richard Metz, and Charlie Johnson from the Texas AgriLife Genomics and Bioinformatics Center (College Station, TX) for additional technical support.

Footnotes

Citation Sturino JM, Rajendran M, Altermann E. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the pediocin-encoding biopreservative and biocontrol strain Pediococcus acidilactici D3. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00208-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00208-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. FAO 2011. Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S. 2010. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365:3065–3081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. FAO 2009. Global agriculture towards 2050. How to feed the world 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goodridge LD, Bisha B. 2011. Phage-based biocontrol strategies to reduce foodborne pathogens in foods. Bacteriophage 1:130–137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stiles ME. 1996. Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70:331–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. USDA Food Safety and Service Inspection 2012. Safe and suitable ingredients used in the production of meat, poultry, and egg products. Directive 7120.1, Revision 12 USDA, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ndahetuye JB, Koo OK, O’Bryan CA, Ricke SC, Crandall PG. 2012. Role of lactic acid bacteria as a biosanitizer to prevent attachment of Listeria monocytogenes F6900 on deli slicer contact surfaces. J. Food Prot. 75:1429–1436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gragg SE, Brooks JC, Brashears MM. 2010. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh spinach using Bovamine meat cultures as a post-harvest intervention and its impact on sensory properties. Food Prot. Trends 30:72–77 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dow A, Alvarado C, Brashears M. 2011. Reduction of inoculated Salmonella cocktail in ground turkey and turkey breasts using Lactobacillus-based intervention. Poult. Sci. 90:876–879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kostrzynska M, Bachand A. 2006. Use of microbial antagonism to reduce pathogen levels on produce and meat products: a review. Can. J. Microbiol. 52:1017–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mills S, Stanton C, Hill C, Ross RP. 2011. New developments and applications of bacteriocins and peptides in foods. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2:299–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19:455–477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Altermann E. 2012. Tracing lifestyle adaptation in prokaryotic genomes. Front. Microbiol. 3:48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J. 2005. ACT: the Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics 21:3422–3423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Barreau G, Tompkins TA, de Carvalho VG. 2012. Draft genome sequence of probiotic strain Pediococcus acidilactici MA18/5M. J. Bacteriol. 194:901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Altermann E, Klaenhammer TR. 2003. GAMOLA: a new local solution for sequence annotation and analyzing draft and finished prokaryotic genomes. Omics 7:161–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Marugg JD, Gonzalez CF, Kunka BS, Ledeboer AM, Pucci MJ, Toonen MY, Walker SA, Zoetmulder LC, Vandenbergh PA. 1992. Cloning, expression, and nucleotide sequence of genes involved in production of pediocin PA-1, and bacteriocin from Pediococcus acidilactici PAC 1.0. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2360–2367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES