Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Jun 20;1(3):e00353-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00353-13

Complete Genome Sequence of an Oral Commensal, Streptococcus oligofermentans Strain AS 1.3089

Huichun Tong a, Nan Shang b, Li Liu c, Xinhui Wang a,d, Jun Cai a,d, Xiuzhu Dong a,
PMCID: PMC3707592  PMID: 23788543

Abstract

Streptococcus oligofermentans, an oral commensal, inhibits the growth of the dental caries pathogen Streptococcus mutans by producing large amounts of hydrogen peroxide. Therefore, it can be a potential probiotic for oral health. Here we report the complete genome sequence of S. oligofermentans strain AS 1.3089.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Streptococcus oligofermentans was first described in 2003 (1). It is frequently isolated from healthy tooth surfaces of the human oral cavity (2). S. oligofermentans not only produces large amounts of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), it also tolerates high concentrations of H2O2; these characteristics enable it to outcompete the dental caries pathogen Streptococcus mutans in a two-species biofilm model (3). It has been demonstrated that S. oligofermentans possesses multiple H2O2-generating enzymes, including lactate oxidase (Lox) (3), pyruvate oxidase (4), and l-amino acid oxidase (l-AAO) (5, 6). In particular, S. oligofermentans utilizes Lox to convert the abundant lactate produced by S. mutans into H2O2, which conversely inhibits the growth of S. mutans (3). Therefore, it has great potential to be developed into a probiotic for prevention of dental caries. The l-AAO-encoding gene of S. oligofermentans is acquired through horizontal gene transfer from other Streptococcus species (7). To better understand the interspecies interaction between S. oligofermentans and other oral streptococcus species in dental plaque and also their antioxidant defense mechanisms, we sequenced the complete genome of S. oligofermentans strain AS 1.3089.

The genome was sequenced at the University of Oklahoma Genome Sequencing Center, using a Roche 454 GS FLX sequencer. A total of 254,858 reads, comprising 62,111,758 bases (approximate 29-fold coverage of the genome), were obtained. All reads were assembled using GS de novo Assembler software, which generated 431 contigs ranging from 76 to 121,160 bp. Relationships of the contigs were determined by multiplex PCR (8). Gaps were filled by sequencing the PCR products using ABI 3730xl capillary sequencers, and low-quality regions of the genome were resequenced. The genome was annotated by the prokaryotic genome automatic annotation pipeline (PGAAP) provided by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Gene predictions were done using a combination of GeneMark and Glimmer (9, 10). Ribosomal RNAs were predicted by Rfam models (11). Transfer RNAs were predicted by tRNAscan-SE (12). Annotation was executed by searching against all proteins from complete microbial genomes using BLAST.

The length of the genome is 2,142,100 bp, with G+C content of 42%. The average length of coding sequence is 884 bp. The genome encodes 2,094 predicted proteins and 50 tRNAs and has 4 copies of 5S-16S-23S rRNA genes. We compared this genome with the genome sequences of an oral commensal, Streptococcus sanguinis strain SK36, and the dental caries pathogen S. mutans strain UA159 and found that 654 protein genes are shared by all three of the species and 741 genes are shared by the oral commensals only, whereas only 29 genes are shared with S. mutans, which is much less than the 193 genes shared between S. sanguinis SK36 and S. mutans UA159 (13). There are 670 genes unique to S. oligofermentans. Detailed comparative analysis with the genomes of oral commensals and dental pathogens might deepen our understanding of the occurrence and development of dental caries.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The complete genome sequence of Streptococcus oligofermentans AS 1.3089 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP004409.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by the China NSFC, grant number 30870042.

Footnotes

Citation Tong H, Shang N, Liu L, Wang X, Cai J, Dong X. 2013. Complete genome sequence of an oral commensal, Streptococcus oligofermentans strain AS 1.3089. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00353-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00353-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tong H, Gao X, Dong X. 2003. Streptococcus oligofermentans sp. nov., a novel oral isolate from caries-free humans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:1101–1104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhang J, Tong HC, Dong XZ, Yue L, Gao XJ. 2010. A preliminary study of biological characteristics of Streptococcus oligofermentans in oral microecology. Caries Res. 44:345–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tong H, Chen W, Merritt J, Qi F, Shi W, Dong X. 2007. Streptococcus oligofermentans inhibits Streptococcus mutans through conversion of lactic acid into inhibitory H2O2: a possible counteroffensive strategy for interspecies competition. Mol. Microbiol. 63:872–880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Liu L, Tong H, Dong X. 2012. Function of the pyruvate oxidase-lactate oxidase cascade in interspecies competition between Streptococcus oligofermentans and Streptococcus mutans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:2120–2127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tong H, Chen W, Shi W, Qi F, Dong X. 2008. SO-LAAO, a novel l-amino acid oxidase that enables Streptococcus oligofermentans to outcompete Streptococcus mutans by generating H2O2 from peptone. J. Bacteriol. 190:4716–4721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhou P, Liu L, Tong H, Dong X. 2012. Role of operon aaoso-mutT in antioxidant defense in Streptococcus oligofermentans. PLoS One 7:e38133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Boggs JM, South AH, Hughes AL. 2012. Phylogenetic analysis supports horizontal gene transfer of l-amino acid oxidase gene in Streptococcus oligofermentans. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12:1005–1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tettelin H, Radune D, Kasif S, Khouri H, Salzberg SL. 1999. Optimized multiplex PCR: efficiently closing a whole-genome shotgun sequencing project. Genomics 62:500–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1107–1115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4636–4641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR. 2003. Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:439–441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Xu P, Alves JM, Kitten T, Brown A, Chen Z, Ozaki LS, Manque P, Ge X, Serrano MG, Puiu D, Hendricks S, Wang Y, Chaplin MD, Akan D, Paik S, Peterson DL, Macrina FL, Buck GA. 2007. Genome of the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus sanguinis. J. Bacteriol. 189:3166–3175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES