Abstract
We present the 1,991,830-bp complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain La-14 (SD-5212). Comparative genomic analysis revealed 99.98% similarity overall to the L. acidophilus NCFM genome. Globally, 111 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (95 SNPs, 16 indels) were observed throughout the genome. Also, a 416-bp deletion in the LA14_1146 sugar ABC transporter was identified.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Several Lactobacillus acidophilus strains have been extensively characterized functionally to document their probiotic attributes (1–4). In vivo and in vitro studies of L. acidophilus strain La-14 have documented probiotic functionalities, including tolerance to gastrointestinal conditions, oxalate-degradation capability, bacteriocin production, and beneficial modulation of the immune response (5–7). The whole-genome sequence for La-14 was determined by FLX Titanium 454 sequencing (8). A total of 833,107 reads were assembled using the L. acidophilus NCFM genome as a template using NGen (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), and were subsequently inspected for quality using SeqMan Pro (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), resulting in an average coverage of 149×. The four gaps in the draft sequence were closed by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The La-14 and NCFM strains were determined to have a single coding sequence (CDS) for 23S rRNA at position 1.63 Mbp, though two had previously been annotated. Genomic annotations were assigned automatically by RAST (9), with some minor additions. The La-14 genome was subsequently aligned against previously sequenced complete genomes of L. acidophilus strains NCFM and 30SC (1, 10) and the L. acidophilus ATCC 4796 genome draft (69 contigs) using progressiveMauve (11).
Alignment of L. acidophilus genomes demonstrated that strains La-14 and NCFM are extremely similar and share high synteny with that of strain ATCC 4796, whereas notable differences were observed with strain 30SC. The overall G+C content of La-14 and NCFM are both 34.7%, which is close to that of ATCC 4796 (33.8%), whereas that of strain 30SC is 38.1%. A comparative analysis of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) array revealed that this typically hypervariable locus was identical in La-14 and NCFM, and similar sequences were observed in ATCC 4796 (though the draft contains a gap), whereas this locus is absent in 30SC (a type I restriction-modification system is encoded at the equivalent position).
A global pairwise comparison of the highly similar genomes of La-14 and NCFM revealed a single 416-bp deletion in LA14_1146, within an ABC transporter ATP binding protein, homologous to LBA1131 in NCFM. Additional analysis of the differences between NCFM and La-14 revealed 16 single-base-pair indels, of which 14 predictively cause frameshifts. Of the 95 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered, 47 of them are nonsynonymous, and 29 occur in intergenic regions. A total of 52 genes are possibly affected by these minor changes.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) stipulates that microbial strains used in food applications must not harbor acquired antimicrobial resistance genes to clinically relevant antimicrobials (12). L. acidophilus La-14 was phenotypically tested using the ISO 10932|IDF 223 method of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and the results were measured against the microbial breakpoints set by the EFSA (12, 13). This strain does not possess any measure of antibiotic resistance that exceeds the breakpoints, and therefore, does not constitute an antibiotic resistance transfer risk. The La-14 genome showcases the similarities between the commercial strains of L. acidophilus sequenced thus far, and it provides an interesting opportunity to investigate how small genomic changes may influence the probiotic functionalities within this species.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The complete genome sequence of L. acidophilus La-14 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. CP005926.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Wesley Morovic for technical assistance in closing the genome.
This work was funded by DuPont Nutrition and Health.
Footnotes
Citation Stahl B, Barrangou R. 2013. Complete genome sequence of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00376-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00376-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. Altermann E, Russell WM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barrangou R, Buck BL, McAuliffe O, Souther N, Dobson A, Duong T, Callanan M, Lick S, Hamrick A, Cano R, Klaenhammer TR. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:3906–3612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Björklund M, Ouwehand AC, Forssten SD, Nikkilä J, Tiihonen K, Rautonen N, Lahtinen SJ. 2012. Gut microbiota of healthy elderly NSAID users is selectively modified with the administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and lactitol. Age (Dordr). 34:987–999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. FAO. WHO 2002. Joint FAO/WHO working group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
- 4. Konstantinov SR, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Bruijns SC, Singh SK, Valence F, Molle D, Lortal S, Altermann E, Klaenhammer TR, van Kooyk Y. 2008. S layer protein A of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM regulates immature dendritic cell and T cell functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:19474–19479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Paineau D, Carcano D, Leyer G, Darquy S, Alyanakian MA, Simoneau G, Bergmann JF, Brassart D, Bornet F, Ouwehand AC. 2008. Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responses in healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 53:107–113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Todorov SD, Furtado DN, Saad SM, Gombossy de Melo Franco BD. 2011. Bacteriocin production and resistance to drugs are advantageous features for Lactobacillus acidophilus la-14, a potential probiotic strain. New Microbiol. 34:357–370 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Turroni S, Vitali B, Bendazzoli C, Candela M, Gotti R, Federici F, Pirovano F, Brigidi P. 2007. Oxalate consumption by lactobacilli: evaluation of oxalyl-CoA decarboxylase and formyl-CoA transferase activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:1600–1609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Oh S, Roh H, Ko HJ, Kim S, Kim KH, Lee SE, Chang IS, Kim S, Choi IG. 2011. Complete genome sequencing of Lactobacillus acidophilus 30SC, isolated from swine intestine. J. Bacteriol. 193:2882–2883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. European Food Safety Authority 2012. Scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2012 update). EFSA J. 10:3020 [Google Scholar]
- 13. European Food Safety Authority 2012. Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J. 10:2740 [Google Scholar]