Abstract
Myxococcus xanthus is a member of the Myxococcales order within the deltaproteobacterial subdivision. Here, we report the whole-genome shotgun sequence of the type IV pilus (T4P) defective strain DZF1, which includes many genes found in strain DZ2 but absent from strain DK1622.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Myxococcus xanthus is a soil-dwelling deltaproteobacterium with a genome length of >9.2 Mb. The Myxococcales were described in the late 19th century for their capacity to produce macroscopic sporangioles or fruiting bodies (1). Organization into fruiting bodies requires extracellular signaling and coordination of two genetically distinct motility systems (2–29). Previously, the sequence of M. xanthus strain DK1622 was determined (NC_008095.1) (30). Recently, we sequenced strain DZ2 (31). These two laboratory strains are noted for behavioral differences (2, 32, 33), and DZ2 has a larger genome (31).
M. xanthus DZF1 is directly descended from the intermediate strain DK101, the progenitor for DK1622, and displays reduced capacity for type IV pilus (T4P)-mediated motility. An earlier study (34) mapped two point mutations in DK101 to pilQ, which encodes the T4P secretin (G741S/N762G), accounting for some phenotypic differences between DZ2 or DK1622 and those strains harboring the pilQ allele. Because the DZ2 genome contains additional genes relative to DK1622 and because differences in motility have been noted, we sequenced DZF1 to determine if the additional genes were more likely gained by DZ2 or lost from DK1622, relative to the progenitor.
M. xanthus DZF1 was sequenced at the University of Iowa DNA Core Facility using 454 GS-FLX titanium technology. Chromosomal DNA was prepared as described previously (31) and processed for sequencing following established protocols. The resulting sequence comprises 388,477 reads totaling 249 Mb, representing 27-fold coverage. The genome was assembled de novo into 75 contigs using Newbler software version 2.7. The resulting genome is approximately 9.28 Mb, similar to that for DZ2 (31), and is approximately 147 kb larger than the DK1622 genome. The RAST annotation server (35) predicts a total of 7,704 coding sequences (CDS) within the DZF1 genome.
The M. xanthus DZF1 sequence reveals a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the pilQ gene, producing a G741S substitution, but lacks the N762G substitution found in DK101 (34). The impact of these SNPs has not been systematically determined but affects the interpretation of several previous studies. Indeed, deletion of mazF (encoding RNA interferase as part of a toxin-antitoxin system) is synthetic with the pilQ allele in both DZF1 and DK101 to affect cell death (36, 37).
Current analysis is ongoing to determine the role of genes found in DZF1, but not in DK1622, encoding proteins predicted to function in transcription, translation, signal transduction, fatty acid modification, and protein transport. Homologs to these genes are found in DZ2 as well as other myxobacteria, including Myxococcus fulvus, Stigmatella aurantiaca, and Sorangium cellulosum. The presence of sequences unique to both DZF1 and DZ2, while absent from DK1622, has been verified by PCR. Thus, the differences between DK1622 and both DZ2 and DZF1 are attributable to a loss of DNA from the DK1622 genome, likely following UV mutagenesis of DK101, which led to excision of one large prophage (38, 39) and may have induced additional lesions. We are investigating several unique sequences found in DZF1 and DZ2 for their role in M. xanthus biology.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number AOBT00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Support for this work was provided by the University of Iowa and NSF MCB-1244021 to J.R.K. Additional support for J.W.W. was provided by NIH T32 GM077973.
We thank Tom Willett, Tom Bair, and Kevin Knudtson for helpful discussions and data analysis.
The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of NIH, NSF, or the University of Iowa.
Footnotes
Citation Müller S, Willett JW, Bahr SM, Scott JC, Wilson JM, Darnell CL, Vlamakis HC, Kirby JR. 2013. Draft genome of a type 4 pilus defective Myxococcus xanthus strain, DZF1. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00392-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00392-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. Thaxter R. 1892. On the Myxobacteriaceae, a new order of Schizomycetes Bot. Gaz. 17:389–406 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Berleman JE, Kirby JR. 2007. Multicellular development in Myxococcus xanthus is stimulated by predator-prey interactions. J. Bacteriol. 189:5675–5682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blackhart BD, Zusman DR. 1985. “Frizzy” genes of Myxococcus xanthus are involved in control of frequency of reversal of gliding motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:8767–8770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bulyha I, Schmidt C, Lenz P, Jakovljevic V, Höne A, Maier B, Hoppert M, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2009. Regulation of the type IV pili molecular machine by dynamic localization of two motor proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 74:691–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Caberoy NB, Welch RD, Jakobsen JS, Slater SC, Garza AG. 2003. Global mutational analysis of NtrC-like activators in Myxococcus xanthus: identifying activator mutants defective for motility and fruiting body development. J. Bacteriol. 185:6083–6094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Campos JM, Zusman DR. 1975. Regulation of development in Myxococcus xanthus: effect of 3′:5′-cyclic AMP, ADP, and nutrition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72:518–522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Giglio KM, Caberoy N, Suen G, Kaiser D, Garza AG. 2011. A cascade of coregulating enhancer binding proteins initiates and propagates a multicellular developmental program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:E431–E439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Huntley S, Hamann N, Wegener-Feldbrügge S, Treuner-Lange A, Kube M, Reinhardt R, Klages S, Müller R, Ronning CM, Nierman WC, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2011. Comparative genomic analysis of fruiting body formation in Myxococcales. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:1083–1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jelsbak L, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2002. Pattern formation by a cell surface-associated morphogen in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2032–2037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kirby JR, Zusman DR. 2003. Chemosensory regulation of developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2008–2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kroos L, Hartzell P, Stephens K, Kaiser D. 1988. A link between cell movement and gene expression argues that motility is required for cell-cell signaling during fruiting body development. Genes Dev. 2:1677–1685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kruse T, Lobedanz S, Berthelsen NM, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2001. C-signal: a cell surface-associated morphogen that induces and co-ordinates multicellular fruiting body morphogenesis and sporulation in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol. Microbiol. 40:156–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Luciano J, Agrebi R, Le Gall AV, Wartel M, Fiegna F, Ducret A, Brochier-Armanet C, Mignot T. 2011. Emergence and modular evolution of a novel motility machinery in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 7 e1002268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. MacNeil SD, Mouzeyan A, Hartzell PL. 1994. Genes required for both gliding motility and development in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol. Microbiol. 14:785–795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mauriello EM, Mignot T, Yang Z, Zusman DR. 2010. Gliding motility revisited: how do the myxobacteria move without flagella? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74:229–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mignot T. 2007. The elusive engine in Myxococcus xanthus gliding motility. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64:2733–2745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mignot T, Kirby JR. 2008. Genetic circuitry controlling motility behaviors of Myxococcus xanthus. BioEssays 30:733–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mignot T, Merlie JP, Jr, Zusman DR. 2005. Regulated pole-to-pole oscillations of a bacterial gliding motility protein. Science 310:855–857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mignot T, Shaevitz JW, Hartzell PL, Zusman DR. 2007. Evidence that focal adhesion complexes power bacterial gliding motility. Science 315:853–856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nudleman E, Wall D, Kaiser D. 2005. Cell-to-cell transfer of bacterial outer membrane lipoproteins. Science 309:125–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pathak DT, Wall D. 2012. Identification of the cglC, cglD, cglE, and cglF genes and their role in cell contact-dependent gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 194:1940–1949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shimkets LJ, Gill RE, Kaiser D. 1983. Developmental cell interactions in Myxococcus xanthus and the spoC locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80:1406–1410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Singer M, Kaiser D. 1995. Ectopic production of guanosine penta- and tetraphosphate can initiate early developmental gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. Genes Dev. 9:1633–1644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wei X, Pathak DT, Wall D. 2011. Heterologous protein transfer within structured myxobacteria biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 81:315–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Welch R, Kaiser D. 2001. Cell behavior in traveling wave patterns of myxobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:14907–14912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Youderian P, Burke N, White DJ, Hartzell PL. 2003. Identification of genes required for adventurous gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus with the transposable element mariner. Mol. Microbiol. 49:555–570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Youderian P, Hartzell PL. 2006. Transposon insertions of Magellan-4 that impair social gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus. Genetics 172:1397–1410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhang Y, Ducret A, Shaevitz J, Mignot T. 2012. From individual cell motility to collective behaviors: insights from a prokaryote, Myxococcus xanthus. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36:149–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zusman DR, Scott AE, Yang Z, Kirby JR. 2007. Chemosensory pathways, motility and development in Myxococcus xanthus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:862–872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Goldman BS, Nierman WC, Kaiser D, Slater SC, Durkin AS, Eisen JA, Ronning CM, Barbazuk WB, Blanchard M, Field C, Halling C, Hinkle G, Iartchuk O, Kim HS, Mackenzie C, Madupu R, Miller N, Shvartsbeyn A, Sullivan SA, Vaudin M, Wiegand R, Kaplan HB, Kaplan HB. 2006. Evolution of sensory complexity recorded in a myxobacterial genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:15200–15205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Müller S, Willett JW, Bahr SM, Darnell CL, Hummels KR, Dong CK, Vlamakis HC, Kirby JR. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Myxococcus xanthus wild-type strain DZ2, a model organism for predation and development. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00217-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00217-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Berleman JE, Chumley T, Cheung P, Kirby JR. 2006. Rippling is a predatory behavior in Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 188:5888–5895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. O’Connor KA, Zusman DR. 1988. Reexamination of the role of autolysis in the development of Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 170:4103–4112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wall D, Kolenbrander PE, Kaiser D. 1999. The Myxococcus xanthus pilQ (sglA) gene encodes a secretin homolog required for type IV pilus biogenesis, social motility, and development. J. Bacteriol. 181:24–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Boynton TO, McMurry JL, Shimkets LJ. 2013. Characterization of Myxococcus xanthus MazF and implications for a new point of regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 87:1267–1276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lee B, Holkenbrink C, Treuner-Lange A, Higgs PI. 2012. Myxococcus xanthus developmental cell fate production: heterogeneous accumulation of developmental regulatory proteins and reexamination of the role of MazF in developmental lysis. J. Bacteriol. 194:3058–3068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chen H, Keseler IM, Shimkets LJ. 1990. Genome size of Myxococcus xanthus determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 172:4206–4213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chen HW, Kuspa A, Keseler IM, Shimkets LJ. 1991. Physical map of the Myxococcus xanthus chromosome. J. Bacteriol. 173:2109–2115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]