Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2013 May 21;288(27):19625–19632. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.449249

Evidence for Late Resolution of the AUX Codon Box in Evolution*

Thomas E Jones ‡,§,¶,1, Lluís Ribas de Pouplana §,¶,2, Rebecca W Alexander ‡,3
PMCID: PMC3707663  PMID: 23696642

Background: Protein biosynthesis requires accurate tRNA aminoacylation.

Results: Bacterial methionyl-tRNA synthetases (MRSs) vary in their ability to reject near-cognate tRNAIle transcripts containing the methionine-specifying CAU anticodon.

Conclusion: Given the degree of near-cognate discrimination among bacterial MRSs, aspects of genetic code accuracy likely were fixed relatively late in evolution.

Significance: This varied discrimination may reflect differing cellular needs for translational accuracy versus plasticity.

Keywords: Aminoacyl tRNA Synthesis, Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase, Enzymes, Phylogenetics, Protein Synthesis, Transfer RNA (tRNA), Anticodon, Genetic Code Evolution, Translational Accuracy

Abstract

Recognition strategies for tRNA aminoacylation are ancient and highly conserved, having been selected very early in the evolution of the genetic code. In most cases, the trinucleotide anticodons of tRNA are important identity determinants for aminoacylation by cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. However, a degree of ambiguity exists in the recognition of certain tRNAIle isoacceptors that are initially transcribed with the methionine-specifying CAU anticodon. In most organisms, the C34 wobble position in these tRNAIle precursors is rapidly modified to lysidine to prevent recognition by methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MRS) and production of a chimeric Met-tRNAIle that would compromise translational fidelity. In certain bacteria, however, lysidine modification is not required for MRS rejection, indicating that this recognition strategy is not universally conserved and may be relatively recent. To explore the actual distribution of lysidine-dependent tRNAIle rejection by MRS, we have investigated the ability of bacterial MRSs from different clades to differentiate cognate tRNACAUMet from near-cognate tRNACAUIle. Discrimination abilities vary greatly and appear unrelated to phylogenetic or structural features of the enzymes or sequence determinants of the tRNA. Our data indicate that tRNAIle identity elements were established late and independently in different bacterial groups. We propose that the observed variation in MRS discrimination ability reflects differences in the evolution of genetic code machineries of emerging bacterial clades.

Introduction

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs for protein biosynthesis at the ribosome. Accurate recognition of cognate tRNA by each aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential as tRNAs charged with noncognate amino acids may be used by the ribosome to incorrectly decode codons, introducing mutations into proteins (1). In general, there are 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, one for each of the standard amino acids (2). (Individual aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are abbreviated using the standard one-letter amino acid abbreviation.) Methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MRS)4 attaches methionine to two distinct tRNA isoaccepting species: initiator tRNAfMet for decoding the initial AUG (start) codon and elongator tRNAMet for decoding internal AUG codons, respectively. All tRNAMet species contain a CAU anticodon. However, the single methionine codon is similar to one of the isoleucine codons (AUA). In fact, these two codons represent the only place in the genetic code where trinucleotides differing only in the type of purine in the wobble (3rd) position specify different amino acids. Solutions to this unique decoding problem vary widely across the tree of life. Higher eukaryotes use a tRNAUAUIle whose U34 is post-transcriptionally modified to pseudouridine, allowing accurate decoding of AUA codons (3). Mitochondria sidestep the recognition problem by using a modified genetic code that assigns both AUA and AUG codons to methionine (4). Bacteria use a tRNACAUIle whose position 34 cytidine in the anticodon is post-transcriptionally modified by lysidine-tRNA synthase (TilS) to lysidine (L); tRNALAUIle then specifically decodes the AUA codon (57). In archaea, agmatidine is introduced into this same position instead of lysidine (8, 9).

In Escherichia coli, lysidine modification switches the amino acid identity of tRNA from methionine to isoleucine and its decoding capacity from AUG methionine codons to AUA isoleucine codons (57). This mechanism is consistent with the prior determination that MRS from E. coli (EcMRS) belongs to an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase group that uses cognate anticodon nucleotides as dominant identity elements for aminoacylation (10). For such synthetases, the same anticodon residues are responsible both for aminoacylation identity and for decoding at the ribosome; in these enzymes, there is just a single code, the genetic code, which is functioning in translation.

The strength of this anticodon recognition element is illustrated by the determination that EcMRS can methionylate in vitro transcripts of the E. coli tRNAIle major isoacceptor in which its GAU anticodon is changed to the methionine CAU (11). However, Mycoplasma penetrans MRS (MpMRS) rejects in vitro transcripts of M. penetrans tRNACAUIle lacking the lysidine 34 (L34) modification, whereas EcMRS aminoacylates the M. penetrans tRNACAUIle transcripts just as efficiently as its cognate tRNAMet transcripts (12). Our results therefore point out a difference in tRNACAUIle discrimination between the E. coli and M. penetrans methionylation systems. MpMRS utilizes residues in the acceptor stem, in particular an A3-U70 base pair, to discriminate against tRNACAUIle even without its lysidine modification (12).

Loosely defined, recognition of non-anticodon tRNA residues constitutes an operational code that matches amino acid with tRNA and is distinct from the genetic code (13). As our previous study compared tRNACAUIle discrimination between just two bacterial MRS enzymes (12), we sought to determine whether strong tRNACAUIle discrimination and the use of this operational code by MpMRS are the exception or the rule for bacterial MRSs. This question is of particular interest because the operational code dictated by the acceptor stem and discriminator base of the tRNA is proposed to be the ancestral recognition mechanism for early tRNA precursors (1315).

As the isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase and MRS catalytic sites have evolved in conjunction with tRNACAU sequences (16), there appear to have been some sequence motifs preferred by each of the synthetases. Acceptor stem nucleotides are tied with tRNACAUIle and tRNACAUMet identity in bacteria; G3-C70 and A3-U70 base pairs are both commonly found in tRNACAUIle, whereas tRNACAUMet and tRNACAUfMet typically have C3-G70 base pairs (17). C4-G69 and C5-G68 also occur frequently in tRNACAUIle. Although these preferences are likely dictated by subtle constraints inherent in the active site of the two different enzymes, the degree of difference between tRNACAUIle and tRNACAUMet varies significantly among species. E. coli and other gammaproteobacteria encode a tRNACAUIle with a C3-G70 base pair common also to its tRNACAUMet and tRNACAUfMet species (17). Thus the key 3-70 base pair used by MpMRS to reject tRNACAUIle is not used by EcMRS to differentiate its cognate from near-cognate tRNACAU (12).

Variation in the zinc binding domain among MRS enzymes might account for tRNACAUIle discrimination differences as this domain is proposed to play a role in acceptor stem recognition (18, 19). The zinc binding domain forms part of the connective polypeptide linking the halves of the Rossmann fold; depending on the organism, one or two small “knuckle” structures are present (20, 21). Strikingly, MRSs of bacterial origin have only a single knuckle, whereas MRSs of the archaeal clade have two (19, 22). Each knuckle that binds zinc typically consists of four cysteine residues in two CXXC motifs (18), although in some enzymes, the knuckle structure is generated without cysteine residues or coordination of zinc. Thus bacterial MRSs can first be divided as bacterial or archaeal in origin, and then they can be further delineated into two additional classes depending on whether they are predicted to bind one or no zinc ions (in the bacterial clade) or one or two zinc ions (in the archaeal clade) (19, 22).

In this work, we investigate the distribution of tRNACAUIle discrimination in bacterial methionylation systems. We selected seven systems from different bacterial clades to explore a variety of phylogenetic and structural characteristics. We considered MRS enzymes of eubacterial origin as well as those thought to result from archaeal gene transfer (22). These species furthermore possess a diverse set of tRNACAU acceptor stems. The seven enzymes also represent each of the four structural classes of MRS with respect to zinc occupancy in the connective polypeptide domain (19). Finally, the species vary with regard to the type of TilS (tRNAIle lysidine synthetase) enzyme they encode: either the longer Type I TilS with an appended tRNA binding domain or the shorter Type II TilS (23, 24). We observe in this set of MRS enzymes a stark variation in levels of tRNACAUIle discrimination with little correlation to the structural and phylogenetic features described above. Our conclusions support the hypothesis that tRNACAU discrimination was established recently with respect to extant bacterial clades.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by IDT-DNA. l-[35S]Methionine and MonoQ and HisTrap nickel columns were from Amersham Biosciences. Restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs, and vector pCR2.1-TOPO was from Invitrogen. Expression vector pQE-70 was from Qiagen. PfuUltra DNA polymerase and XL-10 Gold were from Stratagene. M. penetrans genomic DNA was a gift from Dr. Y. Sasaki of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan. Genomic DNA from Helicobacter pylori strain 26695 (ATCC BAA-255), Streptococcus pneumoniae strain R6 (ATCC BAA-255), Bacteroides fragilis (ATCC 25285), Mycobacterium smegmatis (ATCC 23037), and Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 (ATCC-35210) were purchased from LGC Promochem.

Transfer RNA Substrate Preparation

Transfer RNACAUIle and tRNACAUMet sequences were obtained from the Lowe tRNA database (25). RNAs were generated by in vitro transcription of overlapping oligonucleotides (26) using T7 RNA polymerase, 5 mm NTP, 40 mm DTT, 250 mm HEPES·KOH (pH 7.5), 30 mm MgCl2, 2 mm spermidine, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin at 37 °C for 4 h. Transcripts were separated on denaturing PAGE, eluted from the gel using an Elutrap electroelution apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell), and refolded (80 °C followed by gradual reduction of temperature in the presence of 1 mm MgCl2). Aminoacylation plateaus were used to calculate the concentration of active molecules for each tRNA preparation using 10 μm of the corresponding native enzyme (for tRNAMet samples) or EcMRS (for tRNACAUIle samples). The fraction of aminoacylatable tRNA was consistent with E. coli tRNAMet transcripts we typically use based on A260 quantification of tRNA (30–65% active).

Enzyme Cloning

MRS sequences from S. pneumoniae (SpMRS1, GenBankTM NP_358290.1), H. pylori (HpMRS, GenBank NP_207215.1), B. fragilis (BfMRS, GenBank YP_213853.1), M. smegmatis (MsMRS, GenBank YP_889680.1), and B. burgdorferi (BbMRS, GenBank NP_212721.1) were amplified from genomic DNA and cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector. Each gene was subcloned into the SphI and BamHI sites of the pQE-70 vector (Qiagen) in-frame with a C-terminal His6 tag. The resulting plasmids pQE-70-SpMRS1, pQE-70-HpMRS, pQE-70-BfMRS, pQE-70-MsMRS, and pQE-70-BbMRS were verified by sequencing. Cloning of MpMRS and EcMRS was previously described (12, 27).

Enzyme Overexpression and Purification

XL-10 Gold cells (Stratagene) transformed with pQE-70-MpMRS, pQE-70-SpMRS1, pQE-70-HpMRS, pQE-70-BfMRS, pQE-70-MsMRS, and pQE-70-BbMRS were grown at 37 °C for 12 h. Protein expression and purification on nickel affinity columns were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. pQE-70-SpMRS, pQE-70-HpMRS, pQE-70-BfMRS, pQE-70-MsMRS, and pQE-70-BbMRS elutions yielded expected protein bands of 79, 76, 79, 59, and 87 kDa, respectively. pQE-70-MpMRS elution yielded two protein bands of 128 kDa (the full-length protein) and 63 kDa (corresponding to translation from an internal start site that represents the MRS portion of the polypeptide). The 63-kDa MpΔMRS was further purified by ion exchange chromatography as described previously (12). Monomeric E. coli MRS was expressed from a pET28a vector and purified by nickel affinity chromatography as reported (27).

Aminoacylation Assays

Aminoacylation of tRNA was performed at 25 °C in 30-μl reactions containing 20 mm HEPES·KOH (pH 7.6), 100 μm methionine, 10 mm MgCl2, 5 mm DTT, 4 mm ATP, 150 mm NH4Cl, 100 μm Na2EDTA, 0.5 μCi/ml l-[35S]methionine, 4 μm tRNA transcripts, and 50 nm enzyme as reported (28). SpMRS and BbMRS concentrations were later adjusted to 20 and 300 nm, respectively, to ensure linear rates for methionylation of tRNACAUMet and tRNACAUIle transcripts. BfMRS and MpMRS methionylation of tRNACAUIle could not be detected at enzyme concentrations low enough to observe linear rates for tRNACAUMet. Thus for these enzymes, methionylation of tRNACAUMet was compared with tRNACAUIle by using higher concentrations of both enzyme and tRNACAUIle as described previously (12).

Phylogenetic Analysis

MRS protein sequences were aligned with T-Coffee using standard parameters, and gaps and ambiguously aligned regions were removed (29). Distance trees were calculated with the package PHYLIP, using the programs PROTDIST and NEIGHBOR, and using 1000 bootstraps to estimate robustness of the nodes (30). The overall topology of the tree was confirmed using maximum parsimony using the program PROTPARS in the PHYLIP package and by maximum likelihood using PHYML (31, 32).

RESULTS

Selection of MRS Enzymes

Prior phylogenetic analysis has shown that bacterial MRSs belong to two distinct clades (17). Although many bacterial MRSs appear to be of direct bacterial origin, E. coli and some other species have MRS enzymes apparently resulting from a horizontal gene transfer from archaea. Interestingly, extant archaeal MRS enzymes discriminate against a different C34 modification (agmatidine) than bacterial MRSs (lysidine). On the other hand, eukaryotic cytoplasmic MRSs (arising from archaea) do not require tRNACAUIle discrimination as eukaryotes do not encode a tRNACAUIle (25).

We therefore wondered whether the robust ability of EcMRS to aminoacylate tRNACAUIle (12) might also be observed in other bacterial MRS enzymes of archaeal origin because archaea use a different AUA/AUG decoding strategy. Although previous phylogenetic analyses placed numerous mycoplasma MRSs in the bacterial clade, they did not analyze the position of MpMRS (22). We performed our own phylogenetic analysis of MRS sequences, including those of enzymes assayed in this work. The overall tree architecture was consistent with the previously published work (22). MpMRS was placed in the bacterial clade (Fig. 1), and all the other species tested in this work correctly clustered with species from different families within their same bacterial phylum.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Phylogenetic distance tree of MRS sequences. MRS of archaeal and bacterial origins are depicted in the upper and lower sections, respectively. Species tested in this work are in bold with their corresponding level of tRNACAUIle discrimination boxed beside them. Bootstrap numbers from 1000 bootstrap replicates are depicted to provide an estimate of the robustness of the nodes. The full sequence alignment is given in supplemental Fig. S1.

We thus selected three MRS examples from the bacterial clade and two from the archaeal clade to expand our initial observations on EcMRS (archaeal clade) and MpMRS (bacterial clade). The selected enzymes also represent the four different zinc binding domain classes (Fig. 2). From the bacterial clade, the examined species include MRS from the proteobacterium H. pylori (HpMRS), the GC-rich M. smegmatis (MsMRS), the firmicute S. pneumoniae (SpMRS1), and the opportunistic pathogen M. penetrans (MpMRS). From the archaeal clade, we selected MRS from E. coli (EcMRS), the spirochete B. burgdorferi (BbMRS), and the obligate anaerobe B. fragilis (BfMRS).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Alignment of bacterial MRS “zinc knuckle” regions. Sequences of MRS representatives used in this work were aligned by CLUSTALW (40); zinc binding motifs are highlighted in yellow, and knuckle pseudomotifs (no bound zinc) are highlighted in gray (19).

The genes for these enzymes were cloned, overexpressed in E. coli, and purified. The corresponding tRNACAUMet and tRNACAUIle (supplemental Fig. S2) were transcribed, and the transcript quality was confirmed by plateau aminoacylation assays with the MRS of each species for tRNAMet transcripts and with EcMRS for all tRNACAUIle transcripts.

Bacterial Clade MRSs Show Either Moderate or Strong tRNACAUIle Discrimination

Enzymes from bacterial clade species H. pylori, S. pneumoniae, M. smegmatis, and M. penetrans were assayed for their ability to aminoacylate their cognate tRNACAUMet and near-cognate tRNACAUIle transcripts. The ratio of tRNACAUMet to tRNACAUIle aminoacylation initial rate was calculated for each MRS as a measure of discrimination efficiency. Enzymes displaying greater than 1000-fold difference in discrimination (as previously seen for MpMRS) were termed strong discriminators, whereas enzymes showing greater than 10-fold but less than 1000-fold difference were termed moderate discriminators. HpMRS, MsMRS, and SpMRS showed moderate discrimination, charging tRNACAUMet more efficiently than tRNACAUIle by 20-, 40-, and 90-fold, respectively (Table 1). The aminoacylation profile of HpMRS provides an example of the moderately discriminating enzymes with methionylation of tRNACAUIle observed using nanomolar enzyme concentration. This aminoacylation, whereas modest, is clearly above background and reflects multiple turnover of enzyme (Fig. 3). These results are consistent with tRNACAUIle discrimination being widely distributed throughout the bacterial clade.

TABLE 1.

tRNACAUIle discrimination in relation to MRS, tRNA, and cellular properties

SpMRS was used at 20 nm to aminoacylate 2.37 μm tRNA; MsMRS, HpMRS, and EcMRS were each used at 50 nm to aminoacylate 4 μm tRNA; and BbMRS was used at 300 nm to aminoacylate 4 μm tRNA. For inefficiently aminoacylated tRNAIle substrates, elevated enzyme and tRNA were used to obtain discrimination values.

Enzyme Initial rate of tRNACAUMet Initial rate of tRNACAUIle Discrimination MRS clade Zinc knuckles Zinc ions tRNACAUIle 3-70a tRNACAUMet 3-70a % of GC genome TilS typeb
nm/sec nm/sec
BfMRS 2.3c 0.46c 2000× Archaeal 2 1 G-C C-G 43.1 I
MpMRS 1.5d 1.5d 1600× Bacterial 1 1 A-U C-G 25.7 II
SpMRS 6.0 0.069 90× Bacterial 1 0 A-U C-G 39.7 I
MsMRS 3.3 0.083 40× Bacterial 1 0 G-C C-G 67.4 II
EcMRS 18 0.29 60× Archaeal 2 1 C-G C-G 50.8 I
HpMRS 3.3 0.18 20× Bacterial 1 1 A-U C-G 38.9 II
BbMRS 3.7 1.9 Archaeal 2 2 G-C U-A 28.2 I

a Full tRNA sequences are given in supplemental Figure S2.

b Type I TilS enzymes possess two tRNA binding domains, whereas Type II TilSs possess one tRNA binding domain.

c BfMRS was used at 40 nm to aminoacylate 2 μm cognate tRNACAUMet and at 2 μm to aminoacylate 15.5 μm near-cognate tRNACAUIle.

d MpMRS was used at 12.5 nm to aminoacylate 2 μm cognate tRNACAUMet and at 1.55 μm to aminoacylate 20 μm near-cognate tRNACAUIle.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Discrimination by H. pylori MRS. Top, cloverleaf secondary structures of H. pylori tRNACAU transcripts. Bottom, discrimination against tRNACAUIle by H. pylori MRS. Methionylation by 50 nm HpMRS of 4 μm H. pylori tRNACAUMet transcript was 20-fold more efficient than that of 4 μm H. pylori tRNACAUIle transcript, as determined by comparing initial rates of aminoacylation.

Among the enzymes tested, all bacterial-type MRSs could be classified as discriminating. Representative MRSs from major taxons including firmicutes and proteobacteria were able to reject near-cognate tRNACAUIle. The extent of discrimination varies widely, however, as the strongly discriminating MpMRS also falls within the bacterial clade.

The zinc binding domain class does not correlate with the level of discrimination. MpMRS and HpMRS both have domains with one knuckle and one zinc ion (Fig. 2), but MpMRS is a strongly discriminating MRS with a 1600-fold difference in charging tRNACAUMet over tRNACAUIle, whereas HpMRS shows only a moderate 20-fold level of discrimination.

Similarly, although the A3-U70 base pair of M. penetrans tRNACAUIle is a key identity element for discrimination by MpMRS (12), it is not a predictor of strong discrimination by other enzymes. Like M. penetrans, H. pylori and S. pneumoniae encode tRNACAUIle with A3-U70 base pairs and tRNACAUMet with C3-G70 base pairs (supplemental Fig. S2), yet their corresponding enzymes exhibit only moderate levels of discrimination (20- and 90-fold, respectively). This result is consistent with the prior observation that EcMRS efficiently aminoacylates M. penetrans tRNACAUIle transcripts with the A3-U70 base pair (12); thus A3-U70 is not a universal tRNACAUIle identity element.

Archaeal Clade MRSs Display Great Diversity in Near-cognate Discrimination

The archaeal clade MRSs tested exhibit a striking diversity in their ability to discriminate tRNACAUIle. Initial assays with BfMRS showed no aminoacylation of tRNACAUIle at enzyme concentrations that catalyzed efficient aminoacylation of tRNACAUMet. As in previous work with MpMRS (12), we estimated the degree of discrimination using a higher concentration of enzyme and tRNACAUIle when compared with that used for the tRNACAUMet sample (Fig. 4). Aminoacylation of tRNACAUIle was observed under these conditions, although multiple turnover of the enzyme was not achieved, and we estimate from initial rates of aminoacylation that BfMRS shows a 2000-fold level of discrimination.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Discrimination by B. fragilis MRS. Top, cloverleaf secondary structures of B. fragilis tRNACAU transcripts. Bottom, strong discrimination against tRNACAUIle by B. fragilis MRS. A 2000-fold difference in catalytic efficiency was estimated by comparing initial rates for methionylation of 2 μm B. fragilis tRNACAUMet by 40, 20, or 10 nm BfMRS to methionylation of 15.5 μm B. fragilis tRNACAUIle by 2 μm BfMRS.

The strong discrimination observed for BfMRS is even higher than that seen for the bacterial clade MpMRS and clearly distinct from the moderate 60-fold discrimination seen for the archaeal clade EcMRS. This was an unexpected result as BfMRS has the same two knuckle, one zinc ion configuration as EcMRS. Examination of the zinc binding domains does not suggest significant differences in the motifs or flanking sequences (Fig. 2).

Strikingly, the archaeal-type BbMRS exhibited only a 2-fold difference in aminoacylation efficiency between its cognate and near-cognate transcripts (Fig. 5). BbMRS is the only example of a nondiscriminating MRS identified in this work. This observation raises the critical question: How does B. burgdorferi prevent misinsertion of methionine at isoleucine codons?

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Discrimination by B. burgdorferi MRS. Top, cloverleaf secondary structures of B. burgdorferi tRNACAU transcripts. Bottom, efficient methionylation of tRNACAUIle by B. burgdorferi MRS. Methionylation by 300 nm BbMRS of 4 μm B. burgdorferi tRNACAUIle transcript was only 2-fold less efficient than that of 4 μm B. burgdorferi tRNACAUMet transcript, as determined by comparing initial rates of aminoacylation.

Despite the use of the 3-70 base pair as a strong determinant for many MRSs, the tRNACAUIle and tRNACAUMet of B. burgdorferi contain different 3-70 base pairs. The B. burgdorferi tRNACAUIle has a G3-C70 base pair versus U3-A70 in tRNACAUMet. Thus BbMRS cannot rely on the 3-70 base pair as an identity element for methionylation.

The B. fragilis tRNACAUIle has an acceptor stem that is identical to the B. burgdorferi tRNACAUIle at 12 of 15 nucleotides, including the G3-C70 base pair. However, BfMRS rejects its near-cognate tRNA with 2000-fold discrimination, and BbMRS is nondiscriminating (2-fold aminoacylation difference) despite their common archaeal clade assignment. B. fragilis tRNACAUIle does have an unusual U6-U67 mismatch in its acceptor stem, but the significance of this pair is unclear. The evolutionary relationship of Bacteroides to other bacteria is somewhat ambiguous, and Bacteroides species comprise their own taxon. BfMRS clusters with the MRS of Cytophaga hutchinsonii and also some archaea such as P. abyssi but is phylogenetically distant from BbMRS and EcMRS and their associated clusters (22) (Fig. 1). It is unclear whether strong tRNACAUIle discrimination among the MRS of the archaeal clade is restricted to the Bacteroides taxon or whether it is more widely distributed. Clearly, bacterial or archaeal ancestry alone does not determine tRNACAUIle discrimination ability.

DISCUSSION

The results presented in this work indicate that the extent of tRNACAUIle discrimination by MRS varies widely in bacteria and is not defined by phylogenetic position or by the structural type of the zinc binding domain. Although we showed earlier that the 3-70 base pair is an important element for MpMRS tRNACAUIle rejection, its presence or absence is not an accurate predictor of discrimination across bacteria.

Each of the bacterial clade MRSs tested to date aminoacylates its cognate tRNACAUMet at least 20-fold better than its corresponding near-cognate tRNACAUIle. In contrast, an example of nondiscrimination exists in the archaeal-type BbMRS. BbMRS clusters phylogenetically with eukaryotic MRSs that also have two zinc ions and do not require the same type of near-cognate discrimination as eukaryotes lack tRNACAUIle. However, a single case of nondiscrimination is not sufficient to define a specific relationship between the zinc binding domain class and discrimination. Additional bacterial enzymes with two zinc ions should be assayed to see whether there is indeed a correlation. Furthermore, characterization of the full set of identity elements used by BbMRS is a priority as its cognate tRNAMet acceptor stem contains the unusual U3-A70 pair.

We have also examined the genetic background and biochemical environment of each species for putative selective pressures for robust tRNACAUIle discrimination. The need for acceptor stem-based discrimination in MpMRS could be tied to the high AT bias of the M. penetrans genome, one of the highest of any bacteria (33). The AUA isoleucine codon usage is only 0.4% for the E. coli genome but 2.1% for the M. penetrans genome (34). Increased usage of the AUA codon could potentially make M. penetrans more sensitive to occasional misreading of AUA codons by unmodified Met-tRNACAUIle, thus driving the need for a stronger MpMRS tRNACAUIle discrimination mechanism than required by E. coli. However, this hypothesis is not supported by the analysis of the five additional species tested here. The low GC content B. burgdorferi genome uses AUA codons at almost double the frequency of M. penetrans, but BbMRS does not discriminate (Table 1). Likewise, M. smegmatis is a high GC content bacteria with only one AUA codon per 1000, yet MsMRS does exhibit tRNACAUIle discrimination (34).

A selective pressure for tRNACAUIle discrimination may stem from the efficiency of the TilS enzyme in each species. MRS enzymes lacking acceptor stem-based discrimination rely on the L34 modification to avoid methionylating tRNACAUIle. Such enzymes would be expected to methionylate any unmodified tRNACAUIle present in the cytoplasm. A recent study using a temperature-sensitive Bacillus subtilis TilS did indeed show that loss of TilS activity was correlated with increased mistranslation of AUA codons with methionine, presumably through mismethionylation of unmodified tRNACAUIle (35). However, if TilS efficiently modifies tRNACAUIle to tRNALAUIle, such a scenario would not arise, and acceptor stem-based tRNACAUIle discrimination would not be needed to prevent mischarging by MRS. Thus the discrimination disparity observed here for different MRSs may reflect in part the efficiency of TilS in each organism.

Recent work has shown that E. coli TilS efficiently processes pre-tRNACAUIle into tRNALAUIle, blocking the opportunity for misacylation because pre-tRNACAUIle lacks a mature 3′ end (24). Although the authors found no detectable level of unmodified E. coli tRNACAUIle in vivo, it has been previously demonstrated that a single point mutation in E. coli TilS can raise the percentage of unmodified tRNACAUIle in the cell to 71% (5, 24).

A significant difference in TilS efficiency across species is plausible because there are two distinct types of TilS in bacteria. M. penetrans encodes a Type II TilS that lacks the additional tRNA binding domain found in Type I TilS (e.g. in E. coli TilS) (23, 24). Although the three species tested with the shortened Type II TilS (M. penetrans, M. smegmatis, and H. pylori) have MRS enzymes that discriminate tRNACAUIle, other results of this work do not show such a clean correlation (Table 1). Specifically, B. fragilis possesses a Type I TilS with the additional domain, but BfMRS strongly discriminates tRNACAUIle.

Although the CAU anticodon has long been considered the dominant identity element for aminoacylation by MRS, we show that the presence of this single methionine-specifying anticodon is not sufficient to confer aminoacylation in all bacterial enzymes. Of the enzymes tested, only the archaeal clade BbMRS could be classified as nondiscriminating, with only 2-fold discrimination against tRNACAUIle. Even the well studied EcMRS aminoacylates its cognate tRNA 60-fold more efficiently than its near-cognate tRNACAUIle.

Certainly, the in vitro conditions used here only begin to test the ability of organisms to prevent misacylation. In addition to bacterial modification of the wobble nucleotide to lysidine by TilS, other modifications not present in the transcripts used here, codon usage, and the relative concentrations of methionine versus isoleucine and tRNAMet versus tRNACAUIle are likely to influence translational accuracy at the level of tRNA aminoacylation. Adaptations to the decoding machinery may also enhance accuracy. For example, Mycoplasma mobile is one of several bacteria that lacks TilS; AUA codons are read by tRNAUAUIle, and wobble pairing to Met AUG codons is not observed (36). This suggests that M. mobile ribosomes have adapted to ensure accuracy through a mechanism independent of known anticodon base modifications.

However, despite the numerous means by which genetic fidelity is maintained, translational accuracy may be more plastic than previously thought. Misincorporation of amino acids into the proteome may provide a cellular advantage, particularly during conditions of oxidative or other growth stress (37). In particular, methionine is attached to noncognate tRNAs at about 1% the level of tRNAMet aminoacylation in human (HeLa) cells, and misacylation increases up to 10-fold upon viral infection or exposure to reactive oxygen species-inducing agents (38). The mediator of this misacylation in human cells is MRS, and a wide range of noncognate tRNAs is mischarged. Similarly, EcMRS exhibits in vitro mischarging of the near-cognate tRNACGUThr and tRNACCUArg in an anticodon-dependent fashion; substitutions either to the tRNACNU anticodons or to the EcMRS anticodon binding domain decrease misacylation (39).

The rules governing rejection of near-cognate tRNA are clearly not universal and may reflect a relatively late evolution of discrimination strategies. In this regard, several options appear possible. For example, the final assignment of AUG codons to methionine could be, in itself, a late decision in the development of the code. This seems unlikely given the almost universal utilization of AUG as an initiator codon translated by methionine. Alternatively, a shift in the distribution of isoleucine and methionine codons may have taken place later in evolution. In this case, the current situation in mitochondria could represent the ancestral state, which, due to a universal pressure, was independently resolved into the extant structure of the AUX codon box in different clades. This possibility would explain why the strategies to ensure proper tRNACAUIle discrimination vary so widely among extant species. Alternatively or additionally, the varying degree of cognate versus near-cognate discrimination displayed by bacterial MRSs may indicate species-specific requirements for plasticity of translational fidelity and relative adaptive ability that might be enabled by low level misacylation.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgment

We thank Tamara Hendrickson for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

*

This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB-0448243 (to R. W. A.) and Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology Grant BIO2009-09776 (to L. R. d. P.).

Inline graphic

This article contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2.

4
The abbreviations used are:
MRS
methionyl-tRNA synthetase
TilS
tRNAIle lysidine synthetase.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kowald A., Kirkwood T. B. (1993) Accuracy of tRNA charging and codon: anticodon recognition; relative importance for cellular stability. J. Theor. Biol. 160, 493–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Nagel G. M., Doolittle R. F. (1991) Evolution and relatedness in two aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8121–8125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hellmuth K., Grosjean H., Motorin Y., Deinert K., Hurt E., Simos G. (2000) Cloning and characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe tRNA:pseudouridine synthase Pus1p. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 4604–4610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tomita K., Ueda T., Ishiwa S., Crain P. F., McCloskey J. A., Watanabe K. (1999) Codon reading patterns in Drosophila melanogaster mitochondria based on their tRNA sequences: a unique wobble rule in animal mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4291–4297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ikeuchi Y., Soma A., Ote T., Kato J., Sekine Y., Suzuki T. (2005) molecular mechanism of lysidine synthesis that determines tRNA identity and codon recognition. Mol. Cell 19, 235–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Muramatsu T., Nishikawa K., Nemoto F., Kuchino Y., Nishimura S., Miyazawa T., Yokoyama S. (1988) Codon and amino-acid specificities of a transfer RNA are both converted by a single post-transcriptional modification. Nature 336, 179–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Soma A., Ikeuchi Y., Kanemasa S., Kobayashi K., Ogasawara N., Ote T., Kato J., Watanabe K., Sekine Y., Suzuki T. (2003) An RNA-modifying enzyme that governs both the codon and amino acid specificities of isoleucine tRNA. Mol. Cell 12, 689–698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ikeuchi Y., Kimura S., Numata T., Nakamura D., Yokogawa T., Ogata T., Wada T., Suzuki T. (2010) Agmatine-conjugated cytidine in a tRNA anticodon is essential for AUA decoding in archaea. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 277–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mandal D., Köhrer C., Su D., Russell S. P., Krivos K., Castleberry C. M., Blum P., Limbach P. A., Söll D., RajBhandary U. L. (2010) Agmatidine, a modified cytidine in the anticodon of archaeal tRNAIle, base pairs with adenosine but not with guanosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2872–2877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schulman L. H. (1991) Recognition of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 41, 23–87 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meinnel T., Mechulam Y., Lazennec C., Blanquet S., Fayat G. (1993) Critical role of the acceptor stem of tRNAsMet in their aminoacylation by Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 229, 26–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jones T. E., Brown C. L., Geslain R., Alexander R. W., Ribas de Pouplana L. (2008) An operational RNA code for faithful assignment of AUG triplets to methionine. Mol. Cell 29, 401–407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Schimmel P., Giegé R., Moras D., Yokoyama S. (1993) An operational RNA code for amino acids and possible relationship to genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 8763–8768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cusack S. (1997) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 881–889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ribas de Pouplana L., Schimmel P. (2001) Two classes of tRNA synthetases suggested by sterically compatible dockings on tRNA acceptor stem. Cell 104, 191–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ribas de Pouplana L., Schimmel P. (2000) A view into the origin of life: aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57, 865–870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Silva F. J., Belda E., Talens S. E. (2006) Differential annotation of tRNA genes with anticodon CAT in bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 6015–6022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fourmy D., Mechulam Y., Blanquet S. (1995) Crucial role of an idiosyncratic insertion in the Rossman fold of class 1 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: the case of methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochemistry 34, 15681–15688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mechulam Y., Schmitt E., Maveyraud L., Zelwer C., Nureki O., Yokoyama S., Konno M., Blanquet S. (1999) Crystal structure of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase highlights species-specific features. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 1287–1297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fourmy D., Dardel F., Blanquet S. (1993) Methionyl-tRNA synthetase zinc binding domain. Three-dimensional structure and homology with rubredoxin and gag retroviral proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 1078–1089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Fourmy D., Meinnel T., Mechulam Y., Blanquet S. (1993) Mapping of the zinc binding domain of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 1068–1077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Brown J. R., Gentry D., Becker J. A., Ingraham K., Holmes D. J., Stanhope M. J. (2003) Horizontal transfer of drug-resistant aminoacyl-transfer-RNA synthetases of anthrax and Gram-positive pathogens. EMBO Rep. 4, 692–698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kuratani M., Yoshikawa Y., Bessho Y., Higashijima K., Ishii T., Shibata R., Takahashi S., Yutani K., Yokoyama S. (2007) Structural basis of the initial binding of tRNAIle lysidine synthetase TilS with ATP and l-lysine. Structure 15, 1642–1653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nakanishi K., Bonnefond L., Kimura S., Suzuki T., Ishitani R., Nureki O. (2009) Structural basis for translational fidelity ensured by transfer RNA lysidine synthetase. Nature 461, 1144–1148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lowe T. M., Eddy S. R. (1997) tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sherlin L. D., Bullock T. L., Nissan T. A., Perona J. J., Lariviere F. J., Uhlenbeck O. C., Scaringe S. A. (2001) Chemical and enzymatic synthesis of tRNAs for high-throughput crystallization. RNA 7, 1671–1678 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Banerjee P., Warf M. B., Alexander R. (2009) Effect of a domain-spanning disulfide on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity. Biochemistry 48, 10113–10119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Schulman L. H., Pelka H. (1988) Anticodon switching changes the identity of methionine and valine transfer RNAs. Science 242, 765–768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Notredame C., Higgins D. G., Heringa J. (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 205–217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Felsenstein J. (1988) Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 521–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Guindon S., Gascuel O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Guindon S., Lethiec F., Duroux P., Gascuel O. (2005) PHYML Online—a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W557–W559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sasaki Y., Ishikawa J., Yamashita A., Oshima K., Kenri T., Furuya K., Yoshino C., Horino A., Shiba T., Sasaki T., Hattori M. (2002) The complete genomic sequence of Mycoplasma penetrans, an intracellular bacterial pathogen in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 5293–5300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Peterson J. D., Umayam L. A., Dickinson T., Hickey E. K., White O. (2001) The Comprehensive Microbial Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 123–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fabret C., Dervyn E., Dalmais B., Guillot A., Marck C., Grosjean H., Noirot P. (2011) Life without the essential bacterial tRNAIle2-lysidine synthetase TilS: a case of tRNA gene recruitment in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 1062–1074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Taniguchi T., Miyauchi K., Nakane D., Miyata M., Muto A., Nishimura S., Suzuki T. (2013) Decoding system for the AUA codon by tRNAIle with the UAU anticodon in Mycoplasma mobile. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 2621–2631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Gomes A. C., Miranda I., Silva R. M., Moura G. R., Thomas B., Akoulitchev A., Santos M. A. (2007) A genetic code alteration generates a proteome of high diversity in the human pathogen Candida albicans. Genome Biol. 8, R206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Netzer N., Goodenbour J. M., David A., Dittmar K. A., Jones R. B., Schneider J. R., Boone D., Eves E. M., Rosner M. R., Gibbs J. S., Embry A., Dolan B., Das S., Hickman H. D., Berglund P., Bennink J. R., Yewdell J. W., Pan T. (2009) Innate immune and chemically triggered oxidative stress modifies translational fidelity. Nature 462, 522–526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jones T. E., Alexander R. W., Pan T. (2011) Misacylation of specific nonmethionyl tRNAs by a bacterial methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6933–6938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Larkin M. A., Blackshields G., Brown N. P., Chenna R., McGettigan P. A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I. M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Higgins D. G. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES