Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1981 Jul;68(1):64–74. doi: 10.1172/JCI110255

Effect of acetylcholine on vascular capacity in the dog.

E W Supple, W J Powell Jr
PMCID: PMC370773  PMID: 7251867

Abstract

Acetylcholine produces venoconstriction of isolated vein strip preparations. However, the effect of acetylcholine on overall vascular capacity is not known. To investigate this effect and to elucidate the mechanisms involved, 38 anesthetized dogs were placed on total cardiopulmonary bypass, splenectomized, and given intraarterial infusions of acetylcholine. Almost all of the effect on vascular volume was found to be in the splanchnic circulation, because in four eviscerated animals there was no significant change in capacity. In the animals in which the mesenteric arteries were cannulated to provide constant inflow, and the hepatic vein was cannulated to measure splanchnic venus outflow, acetylcholine infusion for 5 and 21 min increased splanchnic vascular capacity in all animals by 107 +/- 28 (SEM)ml (p less than 0.01) and 291 +/- 132 ml (p less than 0.05), respectively. This increase in splanchnic vascular volume was associated with a rapid and sustained increase in transhepatic resistance to portal blood flow for the duration of the infusions (p less than 0.01). In the animals in which the portal vein was vented proximal to the liver, no significant volume change occurred in the splanchnic vasculature with acetylcholine infusion. Increasing hepatic venous pressure to elevate portal venous pressure to the same level as that achieved with acetylcholine resulted in a similar increase in splanchnic vascular volume. Atropine, but not adrenergic blockade, blocked the acetylcholine-induced volume retention, indicating that the effect of acetylcholine was direct. Substantial volume retention was also achieved by stimulation of the distal ends of the sectioned cervical vagi. Thus, acetylcholine administration directly increases transhepatic resistance and is associated with a pooling of volume in the splanchnic vasculature that would, in the intact animal, result in a decrease in venous return to the heart.

Full text

PDF
64

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caldini P., Permutt S., Waddell J. A., Riley R. L. Effect of epinephrine on pressure, flow, and volume relationships in the systemic circulation of dogs. Circ Res. 1974 May;34(5):606–623. doi: 10.1161/01.res.34.5.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ELIAS H., POPPER H. Venous distribution in livers; comparison in man and experimental animals and application to the morphogenesis of cirrhosis. AMA Arch Pathol. 1955 Mar;59(3):332–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FRIEDMAN E. W., WEINER R. S. Estimation of hepatic sinusoid pressure by means of venous catheters and estimation of portal pressure by hepatic vein catheterization. Am J Physiol. 1951 Jun;165(3):527–531. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.165.3.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GIBSON J. B. The hepatic veins in man and their sphincter mechanisms. J Anat. 1959 Jul;93:368–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Govaerts J. P., Kiekens R. Role of vagal innervation on pancreatic secretion. Surgery. 1968 Jun;63(6):942–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HORVATH S. M., KELLY T., FOLK G. E., Jr, HUTT B. K. Measurement of blood volumes in the splanchnic bed of the dog. Am J Physiol. 1957 Jun;189(3):573–575. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.189.3.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levy M. N., Ng M., Lipman R. I., Zieske H. Vagus nerves and baroreceptor control of ventricular performance. Circ Res. 1966 Jan;18(1):101–106. doi: 10.1161/01.res.18.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PRICE J. B., Jr, MCFATE P. A., SHAW R. F. DYNAMICS OF BLOOD FLOW THROUGH THE NORMAL CANINE LIVER. Surgery. 1964 Dec;56:1109–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rutlen D. L., Supple E. N., Powell W. J., Jr beta-Adrenergic regulation of total systemic intravascular volume in the dog. Circ Res. 1981 Jan;48(1):112–120. doi: 10.1161/01.res.48.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SARNOFF S. J., BROCKMAN S. K., GILMORE J. P., LINDEN R. J., MITCHELL J. H. Regulation of ventricular contraction. Influence of cardiac sympathetic and vagal nerve stimulation on atrial and ventricular dynamics. Circ Res. 1960 Sep;8:1108–1122. doi: 10.1161/01.res.8.5.1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SUTHERLAND S. D. AN EVALUATION OF CHOLINESTERASE TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY OF THE INTRINSIC INNERVATION OF THE LIVER. J Anat. 1964 Jul;98:321–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shepherd J. T., Vanhoutte P. M. Role of the venous system in circulatory control. Mayo Clin Proc. 1978 Apr;53(4):247–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tansy M. F., Mackowiak R. C., Friedman M. H. Influence of stimulation of the central end of the vagus nerve on gastric secretion. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Aug;127(2):259–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WALKER W. F., MACDONALD J. S., PICKARD C. Hepatic vein sphincter mechanism in the dog. Br J Surg. 1960 Sep;48:218–220. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004820828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES